We have launched our new enhanced Editor. There is an overview and tutorial Here.

New Chrome Soft and Chrome Soft X

1356714
14

Comments

  • Napoleon253Napoleon253  75WRX Points: 0Members Posts: 75
    Joined:  edited Jan 12, 2018 #62
    I have played the red and white truvis chrome soft exclusively for the last year. Love the ball! I wonder why other manufacturers don’t use the soccer ball style pattern. Callaway can’t have a patent on it can they??



    The distance for me is just as good if not better than the Prov and putting with them has been a game changer.



    That being said the price point on these balls is an absolute racket!



    I played the Kirkland ball and it performed very well. If not for the lack of inventory I would still be playing them. Costco easily demonstrated that you can make a premium tour quality ball for $15 a dozen...



    How much more does it really cost to make a pinnacle as compared to a ProV1?? I am no expert, but I am guessing they are pretty darn close.



    Someone explain please... make me justify spending so much. If I have the knowledge maybe I won’t cringe every time I have to purchase them.
    Posted:
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • 6thFairway6thFairway  1851WRX Points: 149Members Posts: 1,851
    Joined:  #63
    It's probably awesome, because I've got 5 dozen of the old Chrome Soft to use before I can order this one. image/smile.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':)' />
    Posted:
  • HISPLHISPL  3068WRX Points: 51Members Posts: 3,068
    Joined:  #64


    I have played the red and white truvis chrome soft exclusively for the last year. Love the ball! I wonder why other manufacturers don’t use the soccer ball style pattern. Callaway can’t have a patent on it can they??



    The distance for me is just as good if not better than the Prov and putting with them has been a game changer.



    That being said the price point on these balls is an absolute racket!



    I played the Kirkland ball and it performed very well. If not for the lack of inventory I would still be playing them. Costco easily demonstrated that you can make a premium tour quality ball for $15 a dozen...



    How much more does it really cost to make a pinnacle as compared to a ProV1?? I am no expert, but I am guessing they are pretty darn close.



    Someone explain please... make me justify spending so much. If I have the knowledge maybe I won’t cringe every time I have to purchase them.




    The pricing on balls is not a “racket” how much R&D do you think Costco spent on their balls?



    R&D, marketing, distribution, customer service etc etc adds up and has to be factored into the price.



    Costco simply used what was on offer as an off the shelf design where the costs for R&D were amortised already.



    Factor in little or zero marketing cost, and greatly reduced distribution and customer service costs too.



    I haven’t played either model of the Kirkland balls, they seem to get good reviews and are likely to be a solid performer assuming these reviews are accurate.



    But if you want the absolute best for ball performance then you have to pay for the R&D to go with it.



    Having played the 2018 Chrome Soft ball I can see why Callaway spent the money to design it.



    In my opinion it is the best ball I have ever used.
    Posted:
  • Napoleon253Napoleon253  75WRX Points: 0Members Posts: 75
    Joined:  #65
    HISPL wrote:



    I have played the red and white truvis chrome soft exclusively for the last year. Love the ball! I wonder why other manufacturers don’t use the soccer ball style pattern. Callaway can’t have a patent on it can they??



    The distance for me is just as good if not better than the Prov and putting with them has been a game changer.



    That being said the price point on these balls is an absolute racket!



    I played the Kirkland ball and it performed very well. If not for the lack of inventory I would still be playing them. Costco easily demonstrated that you can make a premium tour quality ball for $15 a dozen...



    How much more does it really cost to make a pinnacle as compared to a ProV1?? I am no expert, but I am guessing they are pretty darn close.



    Someone explain please... make me justify spending so much. If I have the knowledge maybe I won’t cringe every time I have to purchase them.




    The pricing on balls is not a “racket” how much R&D do you think Costco spent on their balls?



    R&D, marketing, distribution, customer service etc etc adds up and has to be factored into the price.



    Costco simply used what was on offer as an off the shelf design where the costs for R&D were amortised already.



    Factor in little or zero marketing cost, and greatly reduced distribution and customer service costs too.



    I haven’t played either model of the Kirkland balls, they seem to get good reviews and are likely to be a solid performer assuming these reviews are accurate.



    But if you want the absolute best for ball performance then you have to pay for the R&D to go with it.



    Having played the 2018 Chrome Soft ball I can see why Callaway spent the money to design it.



    In my opinion it is the best ball I have ever used.
    I understand your point. Maybe I need to stop pulling balls over fences and into lakes/back yards. I guess if I could play a ball longer than 18 holes without loosing it I wouldn’t feel so bad about paying $4 a ball. I am also not the type to hunt aimlessly for a ball in the ruff and I have never once tried to retrieve a ball further in the water than my 5 iron can reach... Lazy??? Probably...I try and justify it with me trying not to slow down the group behind me... even if no one is behind me... Ha! Lol...
    Posted:
  • Gary GutfulGary Gutful  1250WRX Points: 160Members Posts: 1,250
    Joined:  #66
    HISPL wrote:

    Golf4lifer wrote:

    groach wrote:


    I'm confused why people are so upset over $5? Don't get me wrong, I'm not judging your income, budget, etc. Hear me out.



    A new dozen PV1/PV1x costs $47.99 @ Dicks right now online. If the CS/CSX go from $39.99 to $44.99, they are still cheaper. Not as cheap, but still cheaper. Not to mention if this new ball costs more to make in terms of this new material, better believe that price is getting passed to consumers.



    My point is this - if you like a ball, and it truly performs for you, isn't paying another .42c per ball worth it? From a budget standpoint, that's one less coffee per month, or skipping one drive-thru meal. Your other option is to buy the 2017 versions at the discounted price. There will still be tons of them available for a while.




    For me, I liked the CSX and the TP5 equally and the only reason I picked the CSX was the cost. If it goes to 44.99, I would probably still play it, but I would be tempted to play the TP5 or ProV1X because the cost is now comparable. At $39.99 the CSX was a value, at least to me.



    Now, if the new ball is better than the old one, which to me would be hard to imagine then I might just play the new one.




    Performance of the 2018 Chrome Soft/Chrome Soft X, will be something to differentiate between the ProV1/X, TP5/X etc etc



    I really believe the tech that is in this ball makes it perform better than anything else I have tried on the market.


    In what way?
    Posted:
  • campioncampion 3-jack-king  652WRX Points: 35Members Posts: 652
    Joined:  #67
    HISPL wrote:

    Golf4lifer wrote:

    groach wrote:


    I'm confused why people are so upset over $5? Don't get me wrong, I'm not judging your income, budget, etc. Hear me out.



    A new dozen PV1/PV1x costs $47.99 @ Dicks right now online. If the CS/CSX go from $39.99 to $44.99, they are still cheaper. Not as cheap, but still cheaper. Not to mention if this new ball costs more to make in terms of this new material, better believe that price is getting passed to consumers.



    My point is this - if you like a ball, and it truly performs for you, isn't paying another .42c per ball worth it? From a budget standpoint, that's one less coffee per month, or skipping one drive-thru meal. Your other option is to buy the 2017 versions at the discounted price. There will still be tons of them available for a while.




    For me, I liked the CSX and the TP5 equally and the only reason I picked the CSX was the cost. If it goes to 44.99, I would probably still play it, but I would be tempted to play the TP5 or ProV1X because the cost is now comparable. At $39.99 the CSX was a value, at least to me.



    Now, if the new ball is better than the old one, which to me would be hard to imagine then I might just play the new one.




    Performance of the 2018 Chrome Soft/Chrome Soft X, will be something to differentiate between the ProV1/X, TP5/X etc etc



    I really believe the tech that is in this ball makes it perform better than anything else I have tried on the market.




    Are the ball speed claims real? Listened to a pod cast from Callaway today with Hudson swaford. He was very excited about the ball, said it’s the first ball rock Ishii designed.
    Posted:
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • Dunny51Dunny51 Pittsburgh, Pa 239WRX Points: 50Members Posts: 239
    Joined:  #68
    I played the regular truvis most of last season and liked it especially around the greens. At the end of the year I played TP5, I’ll give the 2018 a try at the same price as TP5. I used to play Pro V1 but wasn’t impressed w the durability
    Posted:
  • sirparalotsirparalot  742WRX Points: 98Members Posts: 742
    Joined:  #69
    I really enjoyed the original CS. I switched out to the Q-Star Tour (after giving the Duo Urethane a run as well) this year as I was not a fan of the new CS version. Hoping the 2018 ball feels and plays like the original for me. I'll be at the PGA Show in a couple of weeks and hoping they will be available to hit outdoors at demo day at Orange County National. Not thrilled about the over $40 price as that was a big differentiator in the retail market. Lets be honest 99% of golfers don't gain from most of the ball technology advancements year over year. It comes down to price or name and Titleist still dominates on its name so price becomes the key factor for almost everyone else. That being said if it works better for me and there is a noticeable advantage over my current ball then I will play it and I guess Callaway has enough confidence in this ball and feels that others like me will do the same.
    Posted:
  • just plain billjust plain bill  1488WRX Points: 2Unregistered Posts: 1,488
    Joined:  #70
    I just gotta have yellow. Bought 11 dozen. Great ball, but if pinn soft came in yellow I'd be using it, I think. I think. I AM seeing some interesting shots from 50yds in, lol...
    Posted:
  • getair23getair23  2148WRX Points: 332Members Posts: 2,148
    Joined:  #71
    If they can keep the feel of the soft from last year and Rock can add a little magic adding/reducing spin where needed they will definitely have something special.
    Posted:
    Titleist TS3 9.5  HZRDUS Smoke Green 6.5TX 
    Titleist TS2 15 Aldila Rogue 70x 
    Srixon Z 745 (4-9) Z 945 (pw) KBS tour-x
    Fourteen RM 21 50* KBS Tour FLT 130-x
    Bettinardi "The Hive" Black 54* and 60* KBS Tour FLT 130-x
    Edel 64* Modus 125x
    Titleist Studio Design 2
    Pro V1
  • bigeasybigeasy Bigeasy  1182WRX Points: 126Members Posts: 1,182
    Joined:  edited Jan 13, 2018 #72
    campion wrote:

    HISPL wrote:

    Golf4lifer wrote:

    groach wrote:


    I'm confused why people are so upset over $5? Don't get me wrong, I'm not judging your income, budget, etc. Hear me out.



    A new dozen PV1/PV1x costs $47.99 @ Dicks right now online. If the CS/CSX go from $39.99 to $44.99, they are still cheaper. Not as cheap, but still cheaper. Not to mention if this new ball costs more to make in terms of this new material, better believe that price is getting passed to consumers.



    My point is this - if you like a ball, and it truly performs for you, isn't paying another .42c per ball worth it? From a budget standpoint, that's one less coffee per month, or skipping one drive-thru meal. Your other option is to buy the 2017 versions at the discounted price. There will still be tons of them available for a while.




    For me, I liked the CSX and the TP5 equally and the only reason I picked the CSX was the cost. If it goes to 44.99, I would probably still play it, but I would be tempted to play the TP5 or ProV1X because the cost is now comparable. At $39.99 the CSX was a value, at least to me.



    Now, if the new ball is better than the old one, which to me would be hard to imagine then I might just play the new one.




    Performance of the 2018 Chrome Soft/Chrome Soft X, will be something to differentiate between the ProV1/X, TP5/X etc etc



    I really believe the tech that is in this ball makes it perform better than anything else I have tried on the market.




    Are the ball speed claims real? Listened to a pod cast from Callaway today with Hudson swaford. He was very excited about the ball, said it's the first ball rock Ishii designed.
    Does that mean ball should cost more because Rock Ishi designed it? If i remember correctly, I dont think Nike had a lot of ball customers.Their best player is now playing a Bridgestone, and their second best player said he was going to stockup and he is playing a Taylormade now. I am worried about Callaway golf..
    Posted:
    Taylormade M3 440 Mitsubishi Tensei Blue
    Cobra Flyz+ 14.5 degree, Aldila Tour Blue 75 stiff
    Taylormade M1 19* hybrid
    PingI25 ZZ65 4-pw
    Titleist SM6F Grind 50*, SM7 M Grind 55* SM6 59* S Grind S-300
    Ping Redwood Piper SS 3.O
    Titleist Prov1
    USGA Handicap 6.2
    GolfPride MCC Plus 4 and Tour Velvet Plus 4


    USA! Love it or leave it!
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • getair23getair23  2148WRX Points: 332Members Posts: 2,148
    Joined:  #73
    I wouldn’t be to worried about Callaway. Rock did some pretty awesome stuff at Nike. I’m sure they aren’t interested in losing the #2 spot in ball sales.
    Posted:
    Titleist TS3 9.5  HZRDUS Smoke Green 6.5TX 
    Titleist TS2 15 Aldila Rogue 70x 
    Srixon Z 745 (4-9) Z 945 (pw) KBS tour-x
    Fourteen RM 21 50* KBS Tour FLT 130-x
    Bettinardi "The Hive" Black 54* and 60* KBS Tour FLT 130-x
    Edel 64* Modus 125x
    Titleist Studio Design 2
    Pro V1
  • GC70GC70 What's Next? State of Hockey 7662WRX Points: 252ClubWRX Posts: 7,662
    Joined:  #74
    I can't wait to give these a test run!
    Posted:
    Atmos Blue 6S
     Atmos Red 7S
    Atmos Blue 8S
    Apex CF19 4-AW C-Taper Lite
    SM7's RAW 50F - 54S - 58M - 62M
    Nike 006 Paul Casey Proto (Oven)
    Nike 006 Rory Proto (Oven)
    Scotty T22 Newport
    Pro V1x /

    WITB Link
  • JunglelandJungleland  466WRX Points: 57Members Posts: 466
    Joined:  #75
    Received my test sleeve yesterday, putting them into play later this morning.
    Posted:
  • travtrav  296WRX Points: 79Members Posts: 296
    Joined:  #76
    FWIW the 2017 Chromesoft and X's are on sale for 30 bucks at my local golfshop, probably can get them at yours too.
    Posted:
  • nova6868nova6868  4827WRX Points: 227Members Posts: 4,827
    Joined:  #77
    J13 wrote:


    Heard players are picking up another 2-3mph in ball speed with the ball alone which is pretty crazy if true. Price wise we shall see if it's a good move. If they are really 2-3mph faster then other balls then people will pay $45 for them.




    Ehhh... not bloody likely. The USGA does have limits on balls, and they do testing. I can't imagine they would approve a ball that gave you +3mph compared to everything else.



    Callaway always has lots of hype surrounding their balls. Sometimes it works out, and sometimes it doesn't (i.e. Speed Regime balls which were also $45 and collected dust on the shelves). But the one thing that did seem to work for them was moving the price down to $39 for their premium ball.
    Posted:
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • wldchld22wldchld22  3369WRX Points: 187Members Posts: 3,369
    Joined:  #78
    I might be on falling on the hype train; but if the distance gains are as real as I'm hearing then this is well worth the price. If not then I'm back to hunting last years chrome soft and Bridgestones at discount prices.
    Posted:
  • GDTBATHGDTBATH  157WRX Points: 103Members Posts: 157
    Joined:  #79
    How long do balls last if stored indoors as opposed to say, car trunk or garage?



    I have done comparison testing on ProV1’s, Chrome Soft and Snell MTB. My numbers are consistently better with the Chrome Soft and Snell. Not by a ton, mind you, but just enough to fit my game best. I grabbed three dozen Chrome Soft last summer with some shop credit and just ordered 5 dozen Snell at $23.99 since they’re releasing new models this year.



    I’m assuming they’ll keep a year or two with no performance loss as long as I’m storing them indoors?
    Posted:

    "Play hard. Play Smart. Play Together." - DES

  • HISPLHISPL  3068WRX Points: 51Members Posts: 3,068
    Joined:  #80

    HISPL wrote:

    Golf4lifer wrote:

    groach wrote:


    I'm confused why people are so upset over $5? Don't get me wrong, I'm not judging your income, budget, etc. Hear me out.



    A new dozen PV1/PV1x costs $47.99 @ Dicks right now online. If the CS/CSX go from $39.99 to $44.99, they are still cheaper. Not as cheap, but still cheaper. Not to mention if this new ball costs more to make in terms of this new material, better believe that price is getting passed to consumers.



    My point is this - if you like a ball, and it truly performs for you, isn't paying another .42c per ball worth it? From a budget standpoint, that's one less coffee per month, or skipping one drive-thru meal. Your other option is to buy the 2017 versions at the discounted price. There will still be tons of them available for a while.




    For me, I liked the CSX and the TP5 equally and the only reason I picked the CSX was the cost. If it goes to 44.99, I would probably still play it, but I would be tempted to play the TP5 or ProV1X because the cost is now comparable. At $39.99 the CSX was a value, at least to me.



    Now, if the new ball is better than the old one, which to me would be hard to imagine then I might just play the new one.




    Performance of the 2018 Chrome Soft/Chrome Soft X, will be something to differentiate between the ProV1/X, TP5/X etc etc



    I really believe the tech that is in this ball makes it perform better than anything else I have tried on the market.


    In what way?




    The best spin separation I have ever played in a ball, amazing feel and the seat of the pants feeling is that they are longer too.
    Posted:
  • HISPLHISPL  3068WRX Points: 51Members Posts: 3,068
    Joined:  #81
    campion wrote:

    HISPL wrote:

    Golf4lifer wrote:

    groach wrote:


    I'm confused why people are so upset over $5? Don't get me wrong, I'm not judging your income, budget, etc. Hear me out.



    A new dozen PV1/PV1x costs $47.99 @ Dicks right now online. If the CS/CSX go from $39.99 to $44.99, they are still cheaper. Not as cheap, but still cheaper. Not to mention if this new ball costs more to make in terms of this new material, better believe that price is getting passed to consumers.



    My point is this - if you like a ball, and it truly performs for you, isn't paying another .42c per ball worth it? From a budget standpoint, that's one less coffee per month, or skipping one drive-thru meal. Your other option is to buy the 2017 versions at the discounted price. There will still be tons of them available for a while.




    For me, I liked the CSX and the TP5 equally and the only reason I picked the CSX was the cost. If it goes to 44.99, I would probably still play it, but I would be tempted to play the TP5 or ProV1X because the cost is now comparable. At $39.99 the CSX was a value, at least to me.



    Now, if the new ball is better than the old one, which to me would be hard to imagine then I might just play the new one.




    Performance of the 2018 Chrome Soft/Chrome Soft X, will be something to differentiate between the ProV1/X, TP5/X etc etc



    I really believe the tech that is in this ball makes it perform better than anything else I have tried on the market.




    Are the ball speed claims real? Listened to a pod cast from Callaway today with Hudson swaford. He was very excited about the ball, said it’s the first ball rock Ishii designed.




    I don’t have measurements, but it is the longest premium ball I have ever played.
    Posted:
  • HISPLHISPL  3068WRX Points: 51Members Posts: 3,068
    Joined:  #82
    getair23 wrote:


    I wouldn’t be to worried about Callaway. Rock did some pretty awesome stuff at Nike. I’m sure they aren’t interested in losing the #2 spot in ball sales.




    Callaway is more interested in becoming #1, I think this ball is good enough to do it!
    Posted:
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • HISPLHISPL  3068WRX Points: 51Members Posts: 3,068
    Joined:  #83
    bigeasy wrote:

    campion wrote:

    HISPL wrote:

    Golf4lifer wrote:

    groach wrote:


    I'm confused why people are so upset over $5? Don't get me wrong, I'm not judging your income, budget, etc. Hear me out.



    A new dozen PV1/PV1x costs $47.99 @ Dicks right now online. If the CS/CSX go from $39.99 to $44.99, they are still cheaper. Not as cheap, but still cheaper. Not to mention if this new ball costs more to make in terms of this new material, better believe that price is getting passed to consumers.



    My point is this - if you like a ball, and it truly performs for you, isn't paying another .42c per ball worth it? From a budget standpoint, that's one less coffee per month, or skipping one drive-thru meal. Your other option is to buy the 2017 versions at the discounted price. There will still be tons of them available for a while.




    For me, I liked the CSX and the TP5 equally and the only reason I picked the CSX was the cost. If it goes to 44.99, I would probably still play it, but I would be tempted to play the TP5 or ProV1X because the cost is now comparable. At $39.99 the CSX was a value, at least to me.



    Now, if the new ball is better than the old one, which to me would be hard to imagine then I might just play the new one.




    Performance of the 2018 Chrome Soft/Chrome Soft X, will be something to differentiate between the ProV1/X, TP5/X etc etc



    I really believe the tech that is in this ball makes it perform better than anything else I have tried on the market.




    Are the ball speed claims real? Listened to a pod cast from Callaway today with Hudson swaford. He was very excited about the ball, said it's the first ball rock Ishii designed.
    Does that mean ball should cost more because Rock Ishi designed it? If i remember correctly, I dont think Nike had a lot of ball customers.Their best player is now playing a Bridgestone, and their second best player said he was going to stockup and he is playing a Taylormade now. I am worried about Callaway golf..




    Mr Ishi is very good at what he does, the ball uses some unique materials and construction methods to offer the performance that it does.



    If you don’t want to pay an extra 40c per ball because that is too costly for you then don’t play it... but if you want the performance that it offers, you will pay the money.
    Posted:
  • Lancj1Lancj1  925WRX Points: 91Members Posts: 925
    Joined:  edited Jan 14, 2018 #84


    I have played the red and white truvis chrome soft exclusively for the last year. Love the ball! I wonder why other manufacturers don't use the soccer ball style pattern. Callaway can't have a patent on it can they??




    Non golf related but may be of interest....a guy called Eigil Nielson invented the pattern back in the forties - on a football (soccer...) ball



    His company Select still makes balls and is very successful



    The first ball that became known was the Adidas Telstar in the 1970 World cup



    So, adidas have the history with the pattern though I imagine patents long gone



    The pattern was introduced in football as the leather panels of that shape effected trajectory etc....so all ball technology.



    Forgive my slight stray off topic
    Posted:
  • tbombtbomb Wheel, Snipe, Party - Gongshow Hockey  2376WRX Points: 114Members Posts: 2,376
    Joined:  #85
    Graphene. That's why the ball is so much better. Someone else already said, a sheet of the stuff would cover a football field and weigh as much as a dime.



    They have mixed this super strong material into the cover of the ball, and made it urethane. Why is that so great? Because the cover of the ball is the thinnest possible. Why does that matter? Because the thinner cover creates that 2-3 MPH of ball speed everyone is talking about.



    the new 18 ball will be long and soft and worth every penny.



    IMO Callaway should have dropped the Chrome soft name with this ball because it's so much better it can't even be compared to the 17 ball. Rock is brilliant and Callaway does not want to be #2 in anything...
    Posted:
  • getair23getair23  2148WRX Points: 332Members Posts: 2,148
    Joined:  #86
    Sounds awesome. Graphene for the win!
    Posted:
    Titleist TS3 9.5  HZRDUS Smoke Green 6.5TX 
    Titleist TS2 15 Aldila Rogue 70x 
    Srixon Z 745 (4-9) Z 945 (pw) KBS tour-x
    Fourteen RM 21 50* KBS Tour FLT 130-x
    Bettinardi "The Hive" Black 54* and 60* KBS Tour FLT 130-x
    Edel 64* Modus 125x
    Titleist Studio Design 2
    Pro V1
  • HISPLHISPL  3068WRX Points: 51Members Posts: 3,068
    Joined:  #87
    tbomb wrote:


    Graphene. That's why the ball is so much better. Someone else already said, a sheet of the stuff would cover a football field and weigh as much as a dime.



    They have mixed this super strong material into the cover of the ball, and made it urethane. Why is that so great? Because the cover of the ball is the thinnest possible. Why does that matter? Because the thinner cover creates that 2-3 MPH of ball speed everyone is talking about.



    the new 18 ball will be long and soft and worth every penny.



    IMO Callaway should have dropped the Chrome soft name with this ball because it's so much better it can't even be compared to the 17 ball. Rock is brilliant and Callaway does not want to be #2 in anything...




    This is pretty much it, I was under the impression that the graphene was in the core not the cover but otherwise I agree with everything else.
    Posted:
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • Napoleon253Napoleon253  75WRX Points: 0Members Posts: 75
    Joined:  #88
    Lancj1 wrote:



    I have played the red and white truvis chrome soft exclusively for the last year. Love the ball! I wonder why other manufacturers don't use the soccer ball style pattern. Callaway can't have a patent on it can they??




    Non golf related but may be of interest....a guy called Eigil Nielson invented the pattern back in the forties - on a football (soccer...) ball



    His company Select still makes balls and is very successful



    The first ball that became known was the Adidas Telstar in the 1970 World cup



    So, adidas have the history with the pattern though I imagine patents long gone



    The pattern was introduced in football as the leather panels of that shape effected trajectory etc....so all ball technology.



    Forgive my slight stray off topic
    very cool!
    Posted:
  • crazygolfnutcrazygolfnut CrazyGolfNut Omaha, Nebraska 1225WRX Points: 165Members Posts: 1,225
    Joined:  #89
    I like the Chrome Soft but will think twice if the price is too high. If I have to pay a ProV price, I might as well get a ProV.
    Posted:
    Driver: _________ Ping G400 Max
    Woods: ________ Ping G410 3 & 5 
    Hybrids: _______ Ping  G410 4 & 5
    Irons: __________ Titleist 718 AP1 6-W
    Wedges: _______ Titleist Vokey SM6 52.08F & 56.08M
    Putter: _________ Rife Mid Mallet 400
    Ball: ____________ Snell MTB-X Yellow or Srixon Q-Star Tour Yellow
    Bag: ____________ Datrek Lite Rider
    GPS: ____________ Bushnell NEO Ghost
    Rangefinder: __ Precision Pro NX7 Pro
    GHIN: __________ HCP floats between 10 and 12

    “Never bet against an old man with old clubs that have new grips”
  • lspky_muskielspky_muskie  927WRX Points: 73Members Posts: 927
    Joined:  #90
    We all spend thousands of dollars per year in golf and complain about something that is going to cost maybe $2.00 per round.
    Posted:
14

Leave a Comment

Rich Text Editor. To edit a paragraph's style, hit tab to get to the paragraph menu. From there you will be able to pick one style. Nothing defaults to paragraph. An inline formatting menu will show up when you select text. Hit tab to get into that menu. Some elements, such as rich link embeds, images, loading indicators, and error messages may get inserted into the editor. You may navigate to these using the arrow keys inside of the editor and delete them with the delete or backspace key.