TM Twist Face Rumor

2456710

Comments

  • DTown3011DTown3011 #DTown3011 ClubWRX Posts: 3,556 ClubWRX
    I have no horse in this race. Frankly, I don’t care either way. That said, I do not believe that variants in things like face bulge and roll (TwistFace) or CG location need to be delineated or broken out on the conforming list. As long as the model had “TwistFace” stamped out on the toe like the regular models, TaylorMade could theoretically have a model without it and not require a Spears USGA submission. I’m not saying they DO (I find this hard to believe) I’ll I’m saying is they COULD. Face bulge and roll wouldn’t constitute a different model in my opinion. Just like various Tour models with different internal CG locations need not be submitted separately.



    Again, not sure how this would benefit TaylorMade in any way by doing this, but do not thing we should or can use the USGA list as the determining factor.
    Rogue 10.5* MRC Tensei CK Pro Blue 60S
    Rogue SZ 15* MRC Tensei CK Pro Blue 70S
    Rogue 3h 19* KBS Hybrid Prototype 85S
    Apex '14 #4-PW KBS Tour 120 Matte Black
    MD4 Raw 50-S/56-X/60-S KBS 610 120
    Odyssey MXM-V #7 "Tank" @ 38"
    Callaway '18 Chrome Soft X Truvis
  • puresurfrpuresurfr Members Posts: 1,884 ✭✭
    I wonder if there are certain degrees of twist face .....Just as loft and lies can vary even though they are stamped a certain way. Perhaps the spec is 4 degrees of twist but pros will opt for the faces with the least amount of twist, say 1.2*
  • JunglelandJungleland Members Posts: 425 ✭✭
    QuigleyDU wrote:


    it is interesting that since the beginning of the year. the two biggest ( ok, two biggest i know of) club reviewers and product testers for golf on youtube have gone totally different directions. Rick seems to be trying to be more thorough and technical in his approach and delivery, and Mark seems to be trying to be more and more a comedian.




    Agreed, Crossfield has become a cartoon character
  • Danm2501Danm2501 Members Posts: 258 ✭✭
    edited Feb 12, 2018 #35
    Great reply Kevin. Stay classy. Asking questions to twitter rather than those in the know is just fueling the rumor. I’ll squash it now. Having built drivers all week on the tour truck at Pebble, I can tell you every M3/M4 driver on that truck has twistface. Every single one.


    thefreddyv



    https://twitter.com/...052934526152705



    Well that puts that rumour to rest.
    Taylormade M1 HZRDUS Red 62 TI
    Callaway XR 4 Wood
    Callaway X-Hot 22* Hybrid
    Nike Covert 2.0 Irons (4-SW)
    Vokey SM5 Wedge 50*
    Callaway Mack Daddy III 58*
    Scotty Cameron Futura X5

    Callaway Chrome Soft Golf Ball
  • AzSuperHack76AzSuperHack76 ClubWRX Posts: 1,436 ClubWRX
    His feed on the tweet he posted went pretty sideways for him, I got a good laugh out of it.
  • driveandputtmachinedriveandputtmachine 4 wedges or 2 iron? That is the question! Members Posts: 1,154 ✭✭
    Hot Rod 71 wrote:


    TaylorMade tour players rarely use the same drivers sold at retail. This is nothing new.



    A quick check of the conforming list will reveal the truth.



    Edit: I checked the USGA Conforming List and all of the M3/4 drivers listed have Twist Face. (pp. 1127-1128). The list is dated effective February 12, 2018. In generations past it was common to see several versions of a TM driver (V2, V3, V4, etc.). These were normally the tour heads.



    https://www.usga.org...gClubList_M.pdf




    I agree on almost everything. So Crossfield is stating that TM has clubs that have all the same markings, "SOLE: TaylorMade (w/ T logo), GEOCOUSTIC, M4, HAMMERHEAD CROWN: (T logo alignment mark), M4 HOSEL: (twelve lines), (orientation indicators) HEEL: (loft) FACE:TWIST FACE" However have a differently constructed crown and face(Based on the radius and the way the face works, the crown would have to be slightly different to accommodate a differently a face) that does not have a separate entry on the conforming list?



    I am not sure what the golf police would do to TM if that were the case and they were found out, but the PR backlash alone would be a huge reason not to do this. Let alone any sanctions levied against TM, and the players and how harsh they could be for using a club that is technically not conforming.
    Driver - Ping 400 MAX on Tour 65 
    Fairway - Cobra F8+ on UST Axivcore Black
    Others - Srixon 785 5 Wood on UST Axivcore Black or TM UDI 2 iron on Nippon 130 or Ping G400 17* 
    Irons - (4-A) Taylormade 790's on KBS Tour
    Wedges - Cleveland Rotex 3.0 55*, Rotex 4.0 60* on KBS tour
    Putter - Mannkrafted MA/66 or Taylormade Spider
    Ball - TM TP5x or Srixon Z Star XV
  • Z1ggy16Z1ggy16 Members Posts: 7,174 ✭✭
    MC trying to stir the pot. Youtube turning into a cesspool of drama and BS, and a lot less about giving golfers the info they need on equipment.
    WITB
    DRIVER MIA
    LTD Kai'li 70X
    818H2 Tour Blue 85X
    P790 4i Modus 120X
    P770 5-PW KBS Tour FLT
    Glide Stealth 2.0 50/10SS AMT Wedge
    Glide Stealth 2.0 54/12SS AMT Wedge
    Glide Stealth 2.0 58/12SS Modus 125 Wedge (Hi Toe 58 KBS Wedge in test)
    TP Black Copper Juno w/ PX 7.0 Wedge
    TP5X
    Sun Mountain 4.5 Bag

  • Your-away!Your-away! Members Posts: 922

    Hot Rod 71 wrote:


    TaylorMade tour players rarely use the same drivers sold at retail. This is nothing new.



    A quick check of the conforming list will reveal the truth.



    Edit: I checked the USGA Conforming List and all of the M3/4 drivers listed have Twist Face. (pp. 1127-1128). The list is dated effective February 12, 2018. In generations past it was common to see several versions of a TM driver (V2, V3, V4, etc.). These were normally the tour heads.



    https://www.usga.org...gClubList_M.pdf




    I agree on almost everything. So Crossfield is stating that TM has clubs that have all the same markings, "SOLE: TaylorMade (w/ T logo), GEOCOUSTIC, M4, HAMMERHEAD CROWN: (T logo alignment mark), M4 HOSEL: (twelve lines), (orientation indicators) HEEL: (loft) FACE:TWIST FACE" However have a differently constructed crown and face(Based on the radius and the way the face works, the crown would have to be slightly different to accommodate a differently a face) that does not have a separate entry on the conforming list?



    I am not sure what the golf police would do to TM if that were the case and they were found out, but the PR backlash alone would be a huge reason not to do this. Let alone any sanctions levied against TM, and the players and how harsh they could be for using a club that is technically not conforming.




    Crossfield didnt STATE anything, he tweeted about a "rumour", end of.



    Not like Taylormade haven't done similar stuff in the past is it, just look at all the different versions of the same irons.
    DRIVER:Taylormade M2 (2016) 9.5* - Diamana 60S
    3 WOOD:Taylormade M2 Tour (2017) 17* HL - Diamana 70 S
    HYBRID:Adams Proto DHY 21* - Steelfiber i95 s
    IRONS 4-PW:Taylormade P770 -KBS Tour S 2.0* flat
    GAP WEDGE:Taylormade R Series Satin 51*(52) - KBS Tour S - 2.5* flat
    WEDGES:Titleist SM6 RAW - 56/60 - S300 - 2.5* Flat
    PUTTER:TaylormadeSpider Tour Red - 34"
    BALL:[font=comic sans ms, cursive]Whichever gets bought for me, or found.[/font]
  • DFS PFDDFS PFD Members Posts: 841 ✭✭
    I see a lawsuit in Crossfield's future if this behavior continues.
    TC Rogue SZ 8.8* Pro Orange 70TX/ ACCRA TZ5 75 M5
    M2 Tour 15* Kuro Kage DC 70TX
    790 UDI Tensei Pro White 100TX
    4-PW Apex Pro 19 DG X7's
    50* MG Raw Tour issue S400
    55* MG Raw Tour issue S400
    60* Hi-Toe Tour Issue S400
    J-DAY Spider
  • the bishopthe bishop Members Posts: 3,199 ✭✭
    Not a follower of Crossfield or Shiels but of course aware of their work from being on here. That is pretty irresponsible thing to post and adding the "NOT A STATEMENT" at the end doesn't make it ok. The repercussions of something like that if it were true could be pretty wide ranging and once something like that gets out there on social media it can be pretty tough for a company to get control of the narrative back. Bit of a d*** move.
    Dynacraft Avatar Evolution 10.5* - Proforce V2 HL - S
    TM M1 Tour Issue 14* - Maltby ProSeries Fwy - S
    W/S FG Tour F5 20*/23* - Fubuki  z80 Hybrid - S
    W/S FG62 5-P - DGS300
    W/S PMP Raw 52/56/60 - KBS  Hi-Rev 2.0
    Scotty Newport Mil-Spec Pro Platinum
  • wfrogge1wfrogge1 Members Posts: 1,192 ✭✭
    He clearly says this is a rumor.
  • gioguy21gioguy21 NJMembers Posts: 7,147 ✭✭
    wfrogge1 wrote:


    He clearly says this is a rumor.
    "...but i said all due respect"...

    2017 Tour Issue M1 460 / 9.2* / Rogue 130 Silver 70TX tipped 1"
    Epic Flash SZ / 3+ / DF 70TX tipped 1.50"
    Epic Flash / 5 / BF 90TX Tipped 1.75"
    785 / 3-PW / PX 7.0
    RTX4 / 52, 59 / DG S400
    SC Kombi-s / 35.5"

  • stevemacstevemac Members Posts: 537 ✭✭
    DTown3011 wrote:


    I have no horse in this race. Frankly, I don't care either way. That said, I do not believe that variants in things like face bulge and roll (TwistFace) or CG location need to be delineated or broken out on the conforming list. As long as the model had "TwistFace" stamped out on the toe like the regular models, TaylorMade could theoretically have a model without it and not require a Spears USGA submission. I'm not saying they DO (I find this hard to believe) I'll I'm saying is they COULD. Face bulge and roll wouldn't constitute a different model in my opinion. Just like various Tour models with different internal CG locations need not be submitted separately.



    Again, not sure how this would benefit TaylorMade in any way by doing this, but do not thing we should or can use the USGA list as the determining factor.






    This is absolutely true. Years ago I had a friend who had access to most all tour product from reps, caddies, etc. Ping and Titleist were always the most difficult to get with Cameron the most. It was very interesting that the Vokeys coming out, stamped spin mill, were not milled. We also know that many players have played different manufacturers irons with their sponsored manufacturer stamped on. I don't think that bulge and roll would constitute having to have a different model for the USGA list but there may be something that they do have to comply with as far as limits.
  • wfrogge1wfrogge1 Members Posts: 1,192 ✭✭
    edited Feb 12, 2018 #45
    gioguy21 wrote:

    wfrogge1 wrote:


    He clearly says this is a rumor.
    "...but i said all due respect"...




    He says its a rumor and asks for more information. Given TM's hidden from the public "Tour only model "B" " drivers of the past I can understand why some would feel there are tour only clubs that are different. There is zero harm in relaying the rumor then asking for more information. Why are folks so scared to question authority?
  • gioguy21gioguy21 NJMembers Posts: 7,147 ✭✭
    wfrogge1 wrote:

    gioguy21 wrote:

    wfrogge1 wrote:


    He clearly says this is a rumor.
    "...but i said all due respect"...




    He says its a rumor and asks for more information. Given TM's hidden from the public "Tour only model "B" " drivers of the past I can understand why some would feel there are tour only clubs that are different. There is zero harm in stating the rumor then asking for more information. Why are folks so scared to question authority?


    who's afraid?



    TM has in the past also come out with 3 or 4 iterations of the R1 driver -- all of which on the conforming list. are you saying that 'sometimes they do, sometimes they don't' with regard to getting things certified conforming or not?



    with regard to MC, you have to take into account his audience, and the previous experiences he has had with Taylormade (not even that long ago) - to see that just maaaaybe it's a poke and not just an 'inquiring mind'....

    2017 Tour Issue M1 460 / 9.2* / Rogue 130 Silver 70TX tipped 1"
    Epic Flash SZ / 3+ / DF 70TX tipped 1.50"
    Epic Flash / 5 / BF 90TX Tipped 1.75"
    785 / 3-PW / PX 7.0
    RTX4 / 52, 59 / DG S400
    SC Kombi-s / 35.5"

  • jll62jll62 ClubWRX Posts: 1,996 ClubWRX
    stevemac wrote:

    DTown3011 wrote:


    I have no horse in this race. Frankly, I don't care either way. That said, I do not believe that variants in things like face bulge and roll (TwistFace) or CG location need to be delineated or broken out on the conforming list. As long as the model had "TwistFace" stamped out on the toe like the regular models, TaylorMade could theoretically have a model without it and not require a Spears USGA submission. I'm not saying they DO (I find this hard to believe) I'll I'm saying is they COULD. Face bulge and roll wouldn't constitute a different model in my opinion. Just like various Tour models with different internal CG locations need not be submitted separately.



    Again, not sure how this would benefit TaylorMade in any way by doing this, but do not thing we should or can use the USGA list as the determining factor.






    This is absolutely true. Years ago I had a friend who had access to most all tour product from reps, caddies, etc. Ping and Titleist were always the most difficult to get with Cameron the most. It was very interesting that the Vokeys coming out, stamped spin mill, were not milled. We also know that many players have played different manufacturers irons with their sponsored manufacturer stamped on. I don't think that bulge and roll would constitute having to have a different model for the USGA list but there may be something that they do have to comply with as far as limits.




    This is an apples to oranges comparison because there is no list for wedge iron conformity. Only driver heads have a list, which is why the markings are important for drivers because that's the only way to differentiate an entry on the list. Wedges and irons simply need to conform to the rules for equipment that are spelled out in the rules of golf. Driver heads need to be tested and you may only play a driver head that's on the conforming list if this specific condition of competition is in effect for your event.



    I personally believe that a model without Twist Face would need to be tested separately because the change in face construction (and corresponding sole/crown construction) could absolutely impact the head's performance during the CT test. There's no doubt in my mind that a separate model would need to be on the list.
    TaylorMade M5 9.0, Tensei Pro White 60 S, 44.75"
    TaylorMade M5 Rocket 3, Tensei Pro White 70 S, 42.5"
    TaylorMade P-790 UDI 2, Aerotech SteelFiber i95 S
    TaylorMade P-770 3-4, DG X100 (SSx1)
    TaylorMade P-750 5-PW, DG X100 (SSx1)
    TaylorMade Milled Grind 52 Raw, DG S400
    TaylorMade Hi-Toe 60 (58), DG S400
    TaylorMade DJ Itsy Bitsy Proto, 34"
    TaylorMade TP5x #12

    jll62's WITB
  • RichieHuntRichieHunt Members Posts: 3,616 ✭✭
    Hot Rod 71 wrote:


    TaylorMade tour players rarely use the same drivers sold at retail. This is nothing new.




    That's not really an accurate description. They will likely use a hand picked model that has the exact loft and face angle models with an aftermarket shaft, but they are almost always using the same design.



    In essence, I would highly doubt that the players are not using the Twist Face designed M3 and M4's. TM is going to have some problems getting some players to switch to the M3/M4 because they get a little more spin due to the change in the CoG from the M1/M2 models. But most of them will get contract incentives to play the M3/M4 and you would be surprised at how even the highest paid Tour players cannot refuse those contract incentives to play a club that may be worse for them.













    RH
  • cvhookem63cvhookem63 Fujikura Ventus Experience ETXClubWRX Posts: 4,679 ClubWRX
    Danm2501 wrote:

    Great reply Kevin. Stay classy. Asking questions to twitter rather than those in the know is just fueling the rumor. I’ll squash it now. Having built drivers all week on the tour truck at Pebble, I can tell you every M3/M4 driver on that truck has twistface. Every single one.


    thefreddyv



    https://twitter.com/...052934526152705



    Well that puts that rumour to rest.






    GrczQ9S.png
    WITB Link
    TaylorMade M3 440 9* Fujikura Speeder 857 TR-X
    NIKE Vapor Fly 14* Fujikura Rombax P95X
    NIKE Vapor Fly Pro 3-4 Fujikura Pro 95 Tour Spec X
    TaylorMade P770 5-9 X100
    NIKE OVEN Engage 46* X100 | Engage 50*SS / 55*SS / 60*DS S400
    SCOTTY CAMERON Select Squareback
  • Yanki01Yanki01 TEXASMembers Posts: 5,985 ✭✭
    dude wants **** to confirm or stir the pot more? sheesh
    915D2 Rogue Silver 60S
    915F Rogue Black 80S
    915H Rogue Black 85S
    712u 4i Recoil F4 110
    714 AP2 5-PW Nippon Modus3 Tour 105x
    SM6 51.08F | 56.08M | 60.10S
    Scotty Cameron Mil-Spec 33/350G
    WITB || Scotty Cameron Mil-Spec
  • gioguy21gioguy21 NJMembers Posts: 7,147 ✭✭
    Yanki01 wrote:


    dude wants **** to confirm or stir the pot more? sheesh
    yea, why wouldn't he just confirm with TM? seems like ill-will was intended. like i said, "...but i said with all due respect" #myopinion #justasking #seriouslyjustasking #titleist

    2017 Tour Issue M1 460 / 9.2* / Rogue 130 Silver 70TX tipped 1"
    Epic Flash SZ / 3+ / DF 70TX tipped 1.50"
    Epic Flash / 5 / BF 90TX Tipped 1.75"
    785 / 3-PW / PX 7.0
    RTX4 / 52, 59 / DG S400
    SC Kombi-s / 35.5"

  • bcflyguy1bcflyguy1 Enjoying my coffee... Members Posts: 3,012 ✭✭
    cvhookem63 wrote:




    GrczQ9S.png




    What it looks like when you get owned on Twitter and it's too late to walk it back but you try anyway.
    Never forget that the luxury of being
    wrong is not enough to make you right.
    WITB Link
  • jll62jll62 ClubWRX Posts: 1,996 ClubWRX
    edited Feb 12, 2018 #53
    gioguy21 wrote:

    Yanki01 wrote:


    dude wants **** to confirm or stir the pot more? sheesh
    yea, why wouldn't he just confirm with TM? seems like ill-will was intended. like i said, "...but i said with all due respect" #myopinion #justasking #seriouslyjustasking #titleist




    He knows **** has just as big of a bias against TaylorMade as he does. No doubt in my mind the original tweet was intended to cause issues. Crossfield is a joke at this point. He should join the staff of ****. Perfect bedfellows.
    TaylorMade M5 9.0, Tensei Pro White 60 S, 44.75"
    TaylorMade M5 Rocket 3, Tensei Pro White 70 S, 42.5"
    TaylorMade P-790 UDI 2, Aerotech SteelFiber i95 S
    TaylorMade P-770 3-4, DG X100 (SSx1)
    TaylorMade P-750 5-PW, DG X100 (SSx1)
    TaylorMade Milled Grind 52 Raw, DG S400
    TaylorMade Hi-Toe 60 (58), DG S400
    TaylorMade DJ Itsy Bitsy Proto, 34"
    TaylorMade TP5x #12

    jll62's WITB
  • RichieHuntRichieHunt Members Posts: 3,616 ✭✭
    I don’t know what Crossfield really expects. If you sign with Titleist other OEM’s are going to be skeptical of your reviews that are very subjective to begin with. Even though Crossfield has been positive about TM reviews in the past, what would make people think that he would provide a negative review of Titleist now that he is getting paid by them.



    I would be willing to take Mark’s reviews with an open mind and see if he could prove that despite his affiliation with Titleist that he would give open and honest reviews. But Mark not being able to see that people like myself are in the minority is really out of touch with reality. And this passive aggressive accusations on Twitter are not doing him any favors.











    RH
  • Kid Bro SweetsKid Bro Sweets Members Posts: 206 ✭✭
    edited Feb 12, 2018 #55
    gioguy21 wrote:


    timeline (yes, leaving out some other 'fluff' - but sticking to the important notes):



    - signs with titleist

    - doesn't get testing equipment from TM

    - posts an attempt at humor youtube video about how he didn't get what he wanted

    - posts a 'rumor' of TM clubs on twitter



    hmm...since he's assuming it's true, can we assume that crossfield could be arrogant enough, or paid to badmouth TM since signing with Titleist?




    i can't wait for his next Titleist review. Does he do a witb anymore or i assume it's all Titleist clubs if he's under contract?
    [font=verdana, geneva, lucida,]Ping G400 Max Kuro Kage DC[/font]
    Taylormade 2016 M2 3HL Fuji Pro 73
    [font=verdana, geneva, lucida,]Cobra 5-6 F8 HZRDUS Red 75[/font]
    Oven Nike Vapor Fly Pro 4 Modus3 105
    [font=verdana, geneva, lucida,]Ping I200 5-W Modus3 105[/font]
    [font=verdana, geneva, lucida,]Nike Engage Wedges Modus 125[/font]
    [font=verdana, geneva, lucida,]Nike Origin B2-01 [/font]
  • bcflyguy1bcflyguy1 Enjoying my coffee... Members Posts: 3,012 ✭✭

    gioguy21 wrote:


    timeline (yes, leaving out some other 'fluff' - but sticking to the important notes):



    - signs with titleist

    - doesn't get testing equipment from TM

    - posts an attempt at humor youtube video about how he didn't get what he wanted

    - posts a 'rumor' of TM clubs on twitter



    hmm...since he's assuming it's true, can we assume that crossfield could be arrogant enough, or paid to badmouth TM since signing with Titleist?




    i can't wait for his next Titleist review. Does he do a witb anymore or i assume it's all Titleist clubs if he's under contract?




    He still has his favorite Ping 23* hybrid in the bag.
    Never forget that the luxury of being
    wrong is not enough to make you right.
    WITB Link
  • Z1ggy16Z1ggy16 Members Posts: 7,174 ✭✭
    He should release where the "rumbles" were heard from.



    This is why I'm sticking to golf vlog stuff from now on from like Golfaholics, Cartbarnguys, Formula1 golf, etc. These giant pissing matches with Parfield, Shiels, etc is sophomoric and a waste of time.
    WITB
    DRIVER MIA
    LTD Kai'li 70X
    818H2 Tour Blue 85X
    P790 4i Modus 120X
    P770 5-PW KBS Tour FLT
    Glide Stealth 2.0 50/10SS AMT Wedge
    Glide Stealth 2.0 54/12SS AMT Wedge
    Glide Stealth 2.0 58/12SS Modus 125 Wedge (Hi Toe 58 KBS Wedge in test)
    TP Black Copper Juno w/ PX 7.0 Wedge
    TP5X
    Sun Mountain 4.5 Bag

  • knock it closeknock it close Members Posts: 7,945 ✭✭
    edited Feb 12, 2018 #58
    What an obnoxious little dweeb.





    Also he keeps saying "bruh" on twitter like he's a cali teen from 2011.
    M2, maybe
    915 FD
    913 HD
    712u 3
    714 AP2 4-p
    SM5 53, 59
    Circa62
  • clichecliche Members Posts: 758 ✭✭
    MC got a little to much "power". he thinks that his opinion on golf is the only correct one, and everyone who doesn't go with it clearly didn't get it. y couple of weeks ago he was raving against HSBC bank because of some bank stuff. really stop it MC. i really like your reviews and vlogs, but you start behaving like a spoiled kid.



    and even if the pros dont play the twistface... who cares. you are still not going to be as good as a pro, even when you've got their gear or swingspeed
  • lspky_muskielspky_muskie Members Posts: 895 ✭✭
    I'm sure TM has a way to measure the twist on each face. I'm also sure TM has a different amount of twist on the faces due to manufacturing tolerances.



    I would not be surprised if we found out you could walk into the van and pick out how much twist you wanted while still playing a conforming driver.
  • osubuckeyes691osubuckeyes691 Members Posts: 903 ✭✭
    Why is everyone hating so hard on **** recently? All because of the Evnroll claims from last week? Or is there more that I did not see.
    Taylormade M3 8.5* - Tensei Pro Orange 70TX / Cobra F9 9* Avalance - Fujikura Ventus 7x
    Taylormade 2016 M2 Deep Face 14* - Tensei Blue 90TX
    Hybrid / Driving Iron - TBD
    Srixon 745 4-PW - KBS C Taper 130x softstepped 1x
    Vokey 50* F Grind - KBS C Taper 130
    Vokey Wedgeworks 54V grind - KBS C Taper 130
    Vokey Wedgeworks 60K, low bounce - KBS C Taper 130
    Evnroll ER1.2 Armlock w/ Stability Shaft
Sign In or Register to comment.