What is with the Hating on the USGA?

1356716

Comments

  • caniac6caniac6 Members Posts: 2,706 ✭✭



    I think it’s their general smugness and sense of self importance that bother me the most. The way they act like they’re the only ones who care about the integrity of the game.



    It’s unfortunate that you have to watch one of the great events in golf waiting for the bureaucrats to insert themselves into the drama.




    Agreed. They also bungled a penalty at the US Women's Open that year with waiting too long to assess a penalty and notifying players out of sequence. It's basically laughable that the PGA Tour is better at applying the USGA's rules than the USGA.
    I believe the PGA rules officials are all professional, and many of the USGA rules officials are volunteers.
  • ray9898ray9898 Members Posts: 768 ✭✭
    Why all the hate? It is cool to 'outrage' these days. People get up every day looking for something to jump on and go viral.
  • lawsonmanlawsonman Members Posts: 5,245 ✭✭
    I've listened to Mike Davis on numerous occasions explain the USGA's actions AND inactions. A lot of words come out but I'm never really sure what he said. No one can screw up a course or a ruling like the USGA.
    Welcome to where dumb opinions are better than no opinion. :)

    Ping G400 9°
    Ping Anser 17,20,23, hybrid
    Ping G25 6-UW
    Ping Glide 54,58ES
    Ping Ketsch Vault 2.0
    Ping DLX Bag

    Snell MTB Black
  • KevinxKevinx Members Posts: 115 ✭✭
    It's cause Mike Davis is an idiot. No special exempt for Retif Goosen but gives one to Erie Els and Furyik. The setup at Shinnecock will be so hard and take the players 6 hours to play will be boring and unwatchable. Us open is the worst major.
  • KevinxKevinx Members Posts: 115 ✭✭
    Hank went off for the USGA not having any water/refreshments on the front 9 of the Women's Open at Shoal's Creek.



    The biggest thing was not offering military discount tickets for other then the practice rounds and not having a military appreciation tent at either US Open, men's or women's.


    Liberals hate the military. USGA and where they are having the open are 100% liberal.
  • KevinxKevinx Members Posts: 115 ✭✭
    US Opens should be played on public courses only. Not on private courses can afford to fix the course themselves but look for the USGA to do it for them.
  • bladehunterbladehunter Today was a good day.... Members Posts: 25,850 ✭✭
    15th Club wrote:


    MtlJeff wrote:

    EKELLY wrote:


    Is it because the Tour players have become a bunch of little ****? The US Open is supposed to be tough. Yes, Chambers was a bad call, and Erin was a joke, but everyone played the same course. I grew up playing Shinnecock Hills. They could protect par if they wanted to. We'll see how it plays out!.....




    I find the complaining about courses to be a tad repetitive and annoying too. Players tend to nitpick a couple of things and then post them on twitter or whatever. A couple of years ago there was the video of the player showing a ball rolling for 10 yards past the hole on the practice green, or the guy dribbling a golf ball on the grass to show how hard it was.....but once the tournament started you didn't see stuff like that



    I actually think the USGA has done a good job setting up courses and thinking progressively , Davis has pioneered adding drive-able par 4's most years etc....



    But they are just such idiots in other ways it's hard to like them. I mean when they were like "We've listened to Dustin Johnson, we've listened to his playing partner, we've listened to the rules official on the course, everyone says he did nothing wrong.....that being said, we're giving him a penalty 'cause you know, we can do that sh*t if we want"....I mean they deserve to be ridiculed




    Anyone please correct me if my memory is faulty. I remember a rules official approaching DJ a few holes after the incident, telling him "hey, we're looking at it, but we don't know what we are going to do about it yet", and essentially telling the leader in the final round of a freaking US Open that he can't know where he stands, MID-ROUND, until they make a decision. "You might be ahead by one or two, but we don't know yet. Good luck on the next few holes, bro."



    That was the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen, ruling wise.




    Yeah, your memory is faulty. And so since what you have recounted, fake quotes and all, didn’t happen in that way, all the rest isn’t worth talking about.




    Pretty much exactly how it happened.



    Walk-ing official was called over. Dj told him what he saw happen. Playing partner Westwood was asked. He backed up dj. Walking official said replace it and play on. No penalty.



    Around 10 11 12 ( forget which hole) he’s notified they are looking at it on tape and he maybe penalized. During the back 9 of the us open he’s told he “ maybe penalized “.



    Plenty of players would have folded or at least given up some strokes at that point. I don’t think you mention it to a player unless there is a decision. They tell hi he will need to review it himself after the round. Indicating that they intend for him to call the penalty on himself. Which is a huge red flag in my book. He already gave his account of what he saw. Official who was watching agreed as did his playing partner. No need to look at it afterwards. Easily as huge of a fubar as 04 greens fiasco. Which they blamed on the Shinnecock super.
    TM Tour M6 11.2 * KK Tini XTS 70X
    TM Tour 17 M1 14.5* Graphite Design ADDI 8x
    TM Tour M5 19.8 * Aldila Synergy Blue 70TX  
    Titleist Tour Proto MB 3-pw Modus 130X
    Ping Glide Forged   54 60 S400
    Cameron GSS 009 1.5 tungsten sole weights, sound slot
  • TheInfidelTheInfidel Gotta let the Big Dog eat.... Members Posts: 1,432 ✭✭
    InTheHole wrote:


    I've been listening to PGA Tour Radio more lately- seems to be some serious hatred for the USGA, especially from Hank Haney on his show. Not sure I understand it completely- what did I miss?




    What did you miss? Two words: Chambers Bay.



    Mike Davis wears a rainbow wig and giant shoes in his office he's such a clown and Diana Murphy spent her entire tenure in post drunk as a racoon in a barrel of cider. Google it for the full car crash event.




    Ping G400 9* Project X Hzrdus Black 6.5 (+16g head weight)
    Tour Edge Exotics CB3 Tour 18*, True Temper Bi Matrix RXi X 
    Adams Idea A7 22* UST V2 Hybrid X +0.5'
    Mizuno JPX 900 Forged, Project X LZ 6.5 +0.5' 4-PW
    Mizuno S18 50* Project X LZ 6.0 +0.5'
    Nike Engage Raw 54* S400 +0.5'
    Nike Engage Raw 58* S400 +0.5'
    Odyssey Dual Force 990 

  • golfgirlrobingolfgirlrobin Members Posts: 2,307 ✭✭
    Kevinx wrote:


    It's cause Mike Davis is an idiot. No special exempt for Retif Goosen but gives one to Erie Els and Furyik. The setup at Shinnecock will be so hard and take the players 6 hours to play will be boring and unwatchable. Us open is the worst major.




    They already gave RG a special exemption in 2016. You can argue that they should have saved it for this year, but it’s tough to argue that he should get two.
    Driver: Ping G400 Max 10.5*
    Fairway: Epic Flash 14* & 20*
    Hybrid: Ping G410 22*
    Irons: TaylorMade M CGB 6-SW
    Wedges: Callaway 2019 PM Grind 59* and 64*
    Putter: Ping Cadence TR Ketsch
    Ball:  Titleist Pro V1
  • MtlJeffMtlJeff MontrealMembers Posts: 28,368 ✭✭

    Kevinx wrote:


    It's cause Mike Davis is an idiot. No special exempt for Retif Goosen but gives one to Erie Els and Furyik. The setup at Shinnecock will be so hard and take the players 6 hours to play will be boring and unwatchable. Us open is the worst major.




    They already gave RG a special exemption in 2016. You can argue that they should have saved it for this year, but it’s tough to argue that he should get two.




    I think they told Goosen they have considered his opinion and will let him know once the tournament has started if he gets one or not....like around the 14th hole on Saturday.



    Ping G400 Max 9 w/Matrix Black Tie 80
    Callaway Epic Subzero 14* w/Matrix Black Tie 80
    Callaway Apex Hybrid 20 w/Diamana D+ 95
    Callaway 2016 Apex Pro 4-PW w/S300
    Callaway MD Forged 52,56 w/S300
    Callaway MD 2.0 60 PM grind w/s300
    SGC Northwood Center Shaft 400g
  • North ButteNorth Butte Members Posts: 9,908 ✭✭
    This thread is a bit like asking the caddies at Bushwood what’s with the hating on Judge Smails.
    “1lb beefstak, with
    1pt bitter beer
    every 6 hours.
    1 ten-mile walk every morning.
    1 bed at 11 sharp every night.
    And don't stuff your head with things you don't understand.” 
  • QManyQMany #TheWRX ClubWRX Posts: 9,053 ClubWRX
    They love to interject themselves into the storyline, when it should be about the players and the course.



    They seem to make decisions and then search for "evidence" to help support their position (grooves, anchoring, etc.). If you listened to Live at the US Open last night, it is obvious Mike Davis has a hard-on for the ball and greens books. Without anything to support the decision, I expect them to rule imprudently on those two issues soon.
    Currently in #TheWRX...

    Taylormade M3 460 (9.5°) Tensei CK Pro White 70TX
    Callaway GBB Epic SZ (15°) Tensei CK Pro Blue 80TX
    Callaway XR Pro (20°) Diamana White 90X
    Callaway Apex Pro (4i-PW) DG X100 TI
    Ping Glide 2.0 (50° & 54°) DG S400 TI
    Artisan MT Grind (58°) DG S400
    Odyssey O Works R-Line
    Taylormade TP5X


    QMany's Swing/Sticks / Instagram
  • bladehunterbladehunter Today was a good day.... Members Posts: 25,850 ✭✭
    MtlJeff wrote:


    Kevinx wrote:


    It's cause Mike Davis is an idiot. No special exempt for Retif Goosen but gives one to Erie Els and Furyik. The setup at Shinnecock will be so hard and take the players 6 hours to play will be boring and unwatchable. Us open is the worst major.




    They already gave RG a special exemption in 2016. You can argue that they should have saved it for this year, but it's tough to argue that he should get two.




    I think they told Goosen they have considered his opinion and will let him know once the tournament has started if he gets one or not....like around the 14th hole on Saturday.






    image/swoon.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':swoon:' /> LOL ....
    TM Tour M6 11.2 * KK Tini XTS 70X
    TM Tour 17 M1 14.5* Graphite Design ADDI 8x
    TM Tour M5 19.8 * Aldila Synergy Blue 70TX  
    Titleist Tour Proto MB 3-pw Modus 130X
    Ping Glide Forged   54 60 S400
    Cameron GSS 009 1.5 tungsten sole weights, sound slot
  • North ButteNorth Butte Members Posts: 9,908 ✭✭
    edited Jun 12, 2018 #75
    QMany wrote:


    They love to interject themselves into the storyline, when it should be about the players and the course.



    They seem to make decisions and then search for "evidence" to help support their position (grooves, anchoring, etc.). If you listened to Live at the US Open last night, it is obvious Mike Davis has a hard-on for the ball and greens books. Without anything to support the decision, I expect them to rule imprudently on those two issues soon.




    Exactly. Rangefinders were outlawed for decades because some stuffed shirt at R&A didn't want to look out his office and see people using them on the Old Course. All these so-called economic and "growth of the game" arguments are post hoc rationalization for 100% purely emotional desires on the part of a few people we've granted unearned authority over how the game is played.



    They are going to "do something about the ball" real soon now. I predict that when they do, it will be the beginning of the end of USGA's relevance as anything beyond an organization that sponsors some tournaments. They will have finally squandered their last vestige of relevance to the mainstream of the game if they roll the ball performance back by something like 20%, whether for everyone or try to do it just as "elite competitive events".
    “1lb beefstak, with
    1pt bitter beer
    every 6 hours.
    1 ten-mile walk every morning.
    1 bed at 11 sharp every night.
    And don't stuff your head with things you don't understand.” 
  • lawsonmanlawsonman Members Posts: 5,245 ✭✭
    Excellent post!
    Welcome to where dumb opinions are better than no opinion. :)

    Ping G400 9°
    Ping Anser 17,20,23, hybrid
    Ping G25 6-UW
    Ping Glide 54,58ES
    Ping Ketsch Vault 2.0
    Ping DLX Bag

    Snell MTB Black
  • jdljdl Masshole MassMembers Posts: 1,690 ✭✭

    Barfolomew wrote:


    The boys are pissed they cant wear shorts....




    It's 65 degrees. Thy are wearing long sleeves today. Wtf ?




    Phil is a trendsetter!
  • 3whacker3whacker Members Posts: 411 ✭✭
    my problem with the USGA and he Open is that it doesn't identify the BEST golfers consistently..we usually get the obscure winner who we never hear from again, but for that one week in June, they find a way to pull out a win..Do I want to see the names always win it....of course not..but then I dont want to see 80 % of the field eliminated before the first ball is hit
  • davep043davep043 Members Posts: 3,089 ✭✭
    edited Jun 12, 2018 #79
    3whacker wrote:


    my problem with the USGA and he Open is that it doesn't identify the BEST golfers consistently..we usually get the obscure winner who we never hear from again, but for that one week in June, they find a way to pull out a win..Do I want to see the names always win it....of course not..but then I dont want to see 80 % of the field eliminated before the first ball is hit


    Wait a minute. On one hand, you say we get a number of winners who were nobody before, and who fade back to obscurity later. I agree with that. Then you suggest that only 20% of the field has a chance. Aren't those nobodies part of the big 80% that gets eliminated?
  • QManyQMany #TheWRX ClubWRX Posts: 9,053 ClubWRX
    3whacker wrote:


    my problem with the USGA and he Open is that it doesn't identify the BEST golfers consistently..we usually get the obscure winner who we never hear from again, but for that one week in June, they find a way to pull out a win..Do I want to see the names always win it....of course not..but then I dont want to see 80 % of the field eliminated before the first ball is hit




    Michael Campbell is the only one that comes to mind.



    Graeme McDowell is a Ryder Cup stalwart and had 5 Top-20s in the 7 majors before his US Open win.

    Webb Simpson was 13th in OWGR and had 2 PGA Tour wins in the 10 months before his US Open win.
    Currently in #TheWRX...

    Taylormade M3 460 (9.5°) Tensei CK Pro White 70TX
    Callaway GBB Epic SZ (15°) Tensei CK Pro Blue 80TX
    Callaway XR Pro (20°) Diamana White 90X
    Callaway Apex Pro (4i-PW) DG X100 TI
    Ping Glide 2.0 (50° & 54°) DG S400 TI
    Artisan MT Grind (58°) DG S400
    Odyssey O Works R-Line
    Taylormade TP5X


    QMany's Swing/Sticks / Instagram
  • 15th Club15th Club Members Posts: 1,673 ✭✭
    edited Jun 12, 2018 #81
    3whacker wrote:


    my problem with the USGA and he Open is that it doesn't identify the BEST golfers consistently..we usually get the obscure winner who we never hear from again, but for that one week in June, they find a way to pull out a win..Do I want to see the names always win it....of course not..but then I dont want to see 80 % of the field eliminated before the first ball is hit



    [background=transparent]We sometimes, rarely, get an obscure winner. Not because those winners played poorly and got lucky; but rather because the US Open gives them a chance to play in the first place.[/background]



    [background=transparent]Jack Fleck got into the US Open as a qualifier. And then he went on to play against Ben Hogan head-up and won.[/background]



    [background=transparent]Michael Campbell; already mentioned.[/background]



    [background=transparent]Some might have thought Andy North was obscure. Until he won another US Open, which is one more than Dustin Johnson (so far) Brooks Koepka (so far) or Jordan Speith (so far). Ditto, Lee Janzen. And Julius Boros.[/background]



    [background=transparent]If your measurement for an "obscure" winner of the US Open is someone whose only major victory is a single US Open, that list includes people who were mostly multiple winners on Tour, were competitive in other majors, and who really weren't all that obscure; Tom Kite; Corey Pavin; Jerry Pate; Lou Graham; Ken Venturi, etc,[/background]



    [background=transparent]Your "obscure" list is confined to about two or three names in the last 60 years. You need to go back more than 60 years, to find winners like Jack Fleck, Dick Mayer and Ed Furgol.[/background]



    [background=transparent]So you say that you have a problem with the USGA. But the facts don't support "your problem."[/background]



    [background=transparent]You know why you don't see "obscure" players winning the Masters? Because "obscure" players never get invited, or rarely. And yet, would you have had "a problem" with an obscure Danny Willett winning a US Open? An obscure Larry Mize winning a US Open?[/background]



    [background=transparent]I don't know about you, but I WANT our national championship conducted by the USGA to be open, with qualifiers. And when you do that, once in a great while a qualifier will win.[/background]
  • Ashley SchaefferAshley Schaeffer Members Posts: 2,010 ✭✭
    15th, do you agree with the way the USGA handled the DJ situation in 2016?
    8.5* TS3 - Evenflow White T-1100
    15* M2 2017
    18* M2 2017
    4-PW Mizuno JPX850F
    SM7 50*, 54*, 60*
    SC Newport Two
  • ex0dusex0dus Members Posts: 500 ✭✭
    The groove rule was a joke. Chambers Bay, likewise. The anchoring ban, another joke. Anchoring was fine until someone won a major, then all of a sudden the USGA decided to ban anchoring because they didn't like the way it looked. And of course the rule was a mess which why there is still controversy about anchoring. The DJ ruling....ugh.



    During the Open Championship you hardly ever hear anyone mention the R&A. During the US Open the USGA it is exactly the opposit.
    Cobra King Ltd Pro
    Nike SQ2 13*
    Mizuno MP630 clk hybrid 20*
    Bstone J40 DPC 4 iron
    Cleveland 588 mb 5-pw
    Ping Gorge wedges 56*, 52*
    Cally Mack Daddy PM grind 60*
    Machine adjuster putter
    Bridgestone 330 ball
  • DFS PFDDFS PFD Members Posts: 871 ✭✭
    Honest ignorance here, with an honest question, what organization was behind the Lexi Thompson ruling? That was the most atrocious decision I've heard about in professional golf, and painful to watch.
    TC Rogue SZ 8.8* Pro Orange 70TX/ ACCRA TZ5 75 M5
    M2 Tour 15* Kuro Kage DC 70TX
    790 UDI Tensei Pro White 100TX
    4-PW Apex Pro 19 DG X7's
    50* MG Raw Tour issue S400
    55* MG Raw Tour issue S400
    60* Hi-Toe Tour Issue S400
    J-DAY Spider
  • davep043davep043 Members Posts: 3,089 ✭✭
    For those who "hate" the USGA, can you suggest an alternative?



    You hate the rules, too complicated. Have you read the new rules? They're MUCH easier to read, but I do wonder if they're enough to address all of the potential situations. But if not the USGA, who should write the rules of the game?



    As for pro's who can't get the rules right, most of the mistakes are on the simplest things. Where can I drop when taking relief from a water hazard? Do I really have to put the ball back exactly where I lifted it? It seems that many pros have never learned the rules that most of us know by heart, they're too lazy to actually read them.



    You hate the Handicap System, it either encourages sandbagging by allowing self-posting, or it doesn't allow you to post your solo rounds. It seems like they've split things down the middle, so there are complaints from both sides. But really, how would YOU run it, and who should have control if not the USGA?



    We have a thread here covering 68 pages or more, asking if distance has ruined the PGA tour, but you find it ludicrous that the USGA is researching the effects of distance on golf. Have you gone to the USGA website, read some of the data collected so far? Should the USGA simply ignore a topic that's important enough to merit 68 pages of discussion here?



    There's no question that the USGA has mis-handled some rule situations in their tournaments, and has made what turn out to be poor choices in courses and/or set-ups. Yet some posters here want to see MORE public courses used, courses like Chambers Bay and Erin Hills. Maybe we should just eliminate the US Open, along with the entire USGA. But what do you want to put in place to perform the jobs that really do need to be done?
  • BlackDiamondPar5BlackDiamondPar5 Members Posts: 5,208 ✭✭
    edited Jun 12, 2018 #86
    Hating the USGA because they don't represent the best interests of the vast majority of golfers...Us! Their predominant focus is based on the PGA Tour, and elitists of golf. Furthermore they lied when they say there was overwhelming support for a global handicap system... There most certainly was not!
  • 15th Club15th Club Members Posts: 1,673 ✭✭
    edited Jun 12, 2018 #87
    DFS PFD wrote:


    Honest ignorance here, with an honest question, what organization was behind the Lexi Thompson ruling? That was the most atrocious decision I've heard about in professional golf, and painful to watch.




    Honest, clear answer: it was the USGA.



    And the USGA supplied a completely public accounting of the ruling, and the reaction, HERE. I commend it to you, straight up.



    I thought it was the correct ruling. I have absolutely no problem, with any golf ruling as long as it is the right ruling. I don't care if it was caught by a tv assistant director, or a commentator, or a former USGA executive having a cocktail at home in Florida on his big-screen.



    And by the way; what other sports league or front office is as transparent as the USGA?



    Edit.; yes, the event was the ANA Inspiration, an LPGA-sanctioned event. That's probably a better answer, if you are asking who imposed the ruling. The Rules of Golf were obviously "behind the ruling." Too much USGA-defense on my mind this week, a/k/a "USGA Hateweek."
  • Ashley SchaefferAshley Schaeffer Members Posts: 2,010 ✭✭
    DFS PFD wrote:


    Honest ignorance here, with an honest question, what organization was behind the Lexi Thompson ruling? That was the most atrocious decision I've heard about in professional golf, and painful to watch.




    ANA is put on by the LPGA Tour according to Wikipedia.
    8.5* TS3 - Evenflow White T-1100
    15* M2 2017
    18* M2 2017
    4-PW Mizuno JPX850F
    SM7 50*, 54*, 60*
    SC Newport Two
  • 15th Club15th Club Members Posts: 1,673 ✭✭
    ex0dus wrote:


    The groove rule was a joke. Chambers Bay, likewise. The anchoring ban, another joke. Anchoring was fine until someone won a major, then all of a sudden the USGA decided to ban anchoring because they didn't like the way it looked. And of course the rule was a mess which why there is still controversy about anchoring. The DJ ruling....ugh.



    During the Open Championship you hardly ever hear anyone mention the R&A. During the US Open the USGA it is exactly the opposit.




    I have made it a personal policy to challenge anyone, anytime they say something like, "the groove rule was a joke." My usual habit and custom is to first ask, "Why do you think it was a joke?"
  • canonlbp430canonlbp430 Members Posts: 249 ✭✭
    caniac6 wrote:




    I think it’s their general smugness and sense of self importance that bother me the most. The way they act like they’re the only ones who care about the integrity of the game.



    It’s unfortunate that you have to watch one of the great events in golf waiting for the bureaucrats to insert themselves into the drama.




    Agreed. They also bungled a penalty at the US Women's Open that year with waiting too long to assess a penalty and notifying players out of sequence. It's basically laughable that the PGA Tour is better at applying the USGA's rules than the USGA.
    I believe the PGA rules officials are all professional, and many of the USGA rules officials are volunteers.




    I'm not 100% sure on the makeup of officials but I do know a lot of them are from the state sections and travel to USGA events to be officials. Some are also people who aren't necessarily in the state golf associations but are rules officials that work multiple USGA events per year. There may be the a few randoms that don't fit in either of these boxes.
  • davep043davep043 Members Posts: 3,089 ✭✭
    15th Club wrote:

    DFS PFD wrote:


    Honest ignorance here, with an honest question, what organization was behind the Lexi Thompson ruling? That was the most atrocious decision I've heard about in professional golf, and painful to watch.




    Honest, clear answer: it was the USGA.



    And the USGA supplied a completely public accounting of the ruling, and the reaction, HERE. I commend it to you, straight up.



    I thought it was the correct ruling. I have absolutely no problem, with any golf ruling as long as it is the right ruling. I don't care if it was caught by a tv assistant director, or a commentator, or a former USGA executive having a cocktail at home in Florida on his big-screen.







    ANA is put on by the LPGA Tour according to Wikipedia.


    I believe it was the LPGA who assessed the penalties, and quite correctly. Lexi definitely did not replace the ball in its original position. And as regards the revised rule saying a players "reasonable judgement" will be accepted, I believe she did NOT use reasonable judgement. When you lift the ball an inch high, and move it sideways by almost an inch, that's not a reasonable effort to replace it in its original location. It could have been an effort to avoid an imperfection in the green, we'll never know for sure.
Sign In or Register to comment.