Bending irons upright vs tending to draw/hook the ball

KMeloneyKMeloney Members Posts: 4,755 ✭✭
Despite me always seeming to be "standard" in my iron lies when hitting off a lie board, my range/course divots usually reveal a toe-deep start to them (the toe-end of the sole of the club is entering the turf first, then the divot widens from there), suggesting that maybe my irons should be bent upright some.



However, my natural shot is a draw, and the miss is more often a hook.



Knowing that my miss is a hook, and knowing that bending clubs upright can make them tend to go left, should I abandon the idea of having my lies bent upright? Or, do the benefits of having the club enter the turf uniformly outweigh the downside of anymore left bias in my swing?

Comments

  • SocratesSocrates How can it be so *&#% hard to make a shoulder turn? WinnipegClubWRX Posts: 9,236 ClubWRX
    The whole idea is to have the ball go where you want it to go. The ball doesn't care about the divot pattern.
    Ping G400 9º TFC 419 Stiff at 45"
    Cobra F8 5-6 Fwy at 18.5° Stiff
    Ping i20 3 Hyb 707H Stiff
    X2 Hot 4_-PW Recoil 660 F3 +1/2"
    Ping Forged 52°, ES 56º and ES 60º
    Ping Sigma2 Valor at 34.5"
    MCC Align Midsize
    Moving to the bench:
    Jazz Bear Cat 3 wd Aerotech Stiff
    Vokey SM2 52º cc
    Scotty X7M Dual 38"
  • ignitewvuignitewvu Members Posts: 2,054 ✭✭
    Missing right can also be a sign of a inward club path....



    IDK, I know my Irons are bent 1 Flat & in my case it did turn a Hard drawl on perfectly struck balls to a slight drawl or neutral flight. But for me bending flat was the right thing to do cause I have shorter arms & my toe was always way up at impact.
    M5 9 Fujikura Atmos Black Tour Spec 6 Stiff
    M3 15 3 Wood Mitsubishi Tensei AV 75 Stiff
    M1 19 Hybrid Fujikura Atmos Blue 80HB Stiff
    M1 4i @ 39" KBS Tour 105
    Bridgestone J15DPF 5-PW DG Pro S300
    Callaway Mack Daddy Forged 52, 56 & 60 DGS200
    Odyessey Exo 7 34"
    Bridgestone Tour B XS
  • CwebbCwebb Members Posts: 5,877 ✭✭
    Having the sole enter the turf "uniformly" is overrated. On the other hand, just about any spec change that allows us to be more consistently accurate, is very valuable
  • JagpilotohioJagpilotohio 45+ inch drivers are evil. Columbus, OHMembers Posts: 7,224 ✭✭
    I’m generally all for someone having “correct” lie angles, but if your usual shot is a draw and your miss is a hook, I’d just leave them alone.



    The biggest issue with me is always with the short irons and particularly the wedges. If I take a sand wedge off the rack with a stock 64* lie it always goes left. Every single shot. That lie induced pull is a killer for me. I have to have mine a little bit flat.



    If you already fight going left, leave them alone.



    9.5* Cobra LTD, Old school Grafalloy Blue, 43.5"
    14* Cally 815 alpha fuji 665 X 42"
    16* Cally 815 alpha fuji 665 X, 41.5" (set to 17*)
    19* Titleist 816 H2 fuji 8.8X TS 40.0"
    4-7 2016 Hogan PTx, KBS Tour V, 120X.  
    Ping i210 8 & 9 Proto 125 F5 hardstepped 1x.
    Ping glide 2 46-12, 50-12, 54-14 (at 55) stealth, Vokey SM6 60M (61). Wedges Recoil Proto 125 F5
    33.5" Ghost spider slant neck.
    Srixon Z-star XV
    Jones Trouper Bag
  • KMeloneyKMeloney Members Posts: 4,755 ✭✭
    Socrates wrote:


    The whole idea is to have the ball go where you want it to go. The ball doesn't care about the divot pattern.




    With all due respect, I know that the ball doesn't care. I care, though, because as long as I'm led to believe that I can improve ball contact by having the iron enter the turf uniformly, then I have to wonder if I should address my lie-angles. (If lie angles aren't important, then why are they ever considered?)



    If the answer is that an upright lie will always make the ball go more left, then it sounds like a bad idea. But, if the answer is that by getting the lie correct I could dramatically improve contact such that it might actually correct (or at least override) some of my current left tendencies, then I should probably look into it further.
  • KMeloneyKMeloney Members Posts: 4,755 ✭✭
    Cwebb wrote:


    Having the sole enter the turf "uniformly" is overrated. On the other hand, just about any spec change that allows us to be more consistently accurate, is very valuable




    Thank you. Maybe it's not so much the turf entry (I know that it's a symptom of a possible problem, really) as much as an issue of where a toe-deep swing puts the sweet spot behind the ball, or that I could be unknowingly fighting the face wanting to twist open.



    ...Or that I shouldn't be much concerned with it.
  • JagpilotohioJagpilotohio 45+ inch drivers are evil. Columbus, OHMembers Posts: 7,224 ✭✭
    If you take two swings that are EXACTLY the same in every way, and one is taken with a lie angle that is too upright, it will ALWAYS launch more left than the flatter club.



    Opposite holds true as well. If you make two IDENTICAL swings and one club is too flat for you, it will always launch more to the right than the more upright club.
    9.5* Cobra LTD, Old school Grafalloy Blue, 43.5"
    14* Cally 815 alpha fuji 665 X 42"
    16* Cally 815 alpha fuji 665 X, 41.5" (set to 17*)
    19* Titleist 816 H2 fuji 8.8X TS 40.0"
    4-7 2016 Hogan PTx, KBS Tour V, 120X.  
    Ping i210 8 & 9 Proto 125 F5 hardstepped 1x.
    Ping glide 2 46-12, 50-12, 54-14 (at 55) stealth, Vokey SM6 60M (61). Wedges Recoil Proto 125 F5
    33.5" Ghost spider slant neck.
    Srixon Z-star XV
    Jones Trouper Bag
  • CwebbCwebb Members Posts: 5,877 ✭✭
    Also, a non-uniform divot does not necessarily mean that the sole was not "uniform" during contact.



    A toe heavy divot can simply indicate a "high rate of closure" through and past impact. A fast closing club face will almost always toe dig the divot,....in part because the toe is arriving in the ground before the heel
  • JagpilotohioJagpilotohio 45+ inch drivers are evil. Columbus, OHMembers Posts: 7,224 ✭✭
    If it makes a difference to you, my divots all look like my toe is digging just a hair more than the heel and I know my lies are dead on. I Check and adjust them every year.
    9.5* Cobra LTD, Old school Grafalloy Blue, 43.5"
    14* Cally 815 alpha fuji 665 X 42"
    16* Cally 815 alpha fuji 665 X, 41.5" (set to 17*)
    19* Titleist 816 H2 fuji 8.8X TS 40.0"
    4-7 2016 Hogan PTx, KBS Tour V, 120X.  
    Ping i210 8 & 9 Proto 125 F5 hardstepped 1x.
    Ping glide 2 46-12, 50-12, 54-14 (at 55) stealth, Vokey SM6 60M (61). Wedges Recoil Proto 125 F5
    33.5" Ghost spider slant neck.
    Srixon Z-star XV
    Jones Trouper Bag
  • KMeloneyKMeloney Members Posts: 4,755 ✭✭
    Cwebb wrote:


    Also, a non-uniform divot does not necessarily mean that the sole was not "uniform" during contact.



    A toe heavy divot can simply indicate a "high rate of closure" through and past impact. A fast closing club face will almost always toe dig the divot,....in part because the toe is arriving in the ground before the heel




    Great info.
  • KMeloneyKMeloney Members Posts: 4,755 ✭✭


    If it makes a difference to you, my divots all look like my toe is digging just a hair more than the heel and I know my lies are dead on. I Check and adjust them every year.




    Yes sir, that makes a difference to me. I certainly don't want to have my irons bent if they shouldn't be -- just looking to learn something here.
  • ValtielValtiel Konica-Minolta Bizhub Members Posts: 1,908 ✭✭
    Cwebb wrote:


    Also, a non-uniform divot does not necessarily mean that the sole was not "uniform" during contact.



    A toe heavy divot can simply indicate a "high rate of closure" through and past impact. A fast closing club face will almost always toe dig the divot,....in part because the toe is arriving in the ground before the heel




    That would explain a draw bias/hook miss as well so it seems like a good thing to address.
    Taylormade M1 430 8.5* Tensei Pro Orange V2 70TX || Titleist 915D3 8.5* Diamana Kai'li 80x
    Callaway XHot 3Deep Pro 14.5* Fujikura Motore VC 8.3 Tour Spec X || Nike SQ2 13* Diamana Blueboard 83x
    Nike Tour Issue SQ2 17* Diamana Blueboard 103x || SQ2 15* Diamana Blueboard 93x
    PING Anser 20* Aldila Rogue Black 110MSI 105h Tour-X || Taylormade V-Steel 21* Project X Rifle Satin 6.5
    Mizuno MP-H4 3i 21* Project X PXi 7.0
    Mizuno MP-H4 4i 24* Project X PXi 7.0
    Mizuno MP-59 4i-PW 24*- 48* Brunswick Precision Rifle FCM 7.0
    Vokey Mild Raw 8620 54* Brunswick Precision Rifle FCM 7.0
    Vokey  SM6 58* Oil Can Low Bounce K-Grind Brunswick Precision FCM 7.3 SSx1
    Vokey Special 62* Black Oxide V-Grind Brunswick Precision FCM 7.3 SSx2
    Scotty Cameron Santa Fe Bullseye shaft

    WITB Thread
  • Awainer1Awainer1 Members Posts: 888 ✭✭
    Bending upright won’t necessarily cause ur draw to be exaggerated. I play my irons 2 upright and if they are any flatter than that I tend to lower my hands and try to flip the club through instead of just taking my normal in to out swing.
  • SocratesSocrates How can it be so *&#% hard to make a shoulder turn? WinnipegClubWRX Posts: 9,236 ClubWRX
    KMeloney wrote:

    Socrates wrote:


    The whole idea is to have the ball go where you want it to go. The ball doesn't care about the divot pattern.




    With all due respect, I know that the ball doesn't care. I care, though, because as long as I'm led to believe that I can improve ball contact by having the iron enter the turf uniformly, then I have to wonder if I should address my lie-angles. (If lie angles aren't important, then why are they ever considered?)



    If the answer is that an upright lie will always make the ball go more left, then it sounds like a bad idea. But, if the answer is that by getting the lie correct I could dramatically improve contact such that it might actually correct (or at least override) some of my current left tendencies, then I should probably look into it further.


    Sounds like you are trying to convince yourself to fix something that ain’t broke. Lie angles are important, but the important part is the relationship of the club head at impact and not after. And the divot happens after impact.
    Ping G400 9º TFC 419 Stiff at 45"
    Cobra F8 5-6 Fwy at 18.5° Stiff
    Ping i20 3 Hyb 707H Stiff
    X2 Hot 4_-PW Recoil 660 F3 +1/2"
    Ping Forged 52°, ES 56º and ES 60º
    Ping Sigma2 Valor at 34.5"
    MCC Align Midsize
    Moving to the bench:
    Jazz Bear Cat 3 wd Aerotech Stiff
    Vokey SM2 52º cc
    Scotty X7M Dual 38"
  • FireballerFireballer Members Posts: 387 ✭✭
    edited Jun 13, 2018 #16
    Are you delivering the club with high hands? That will certainly make the head toe down at impact.
  • JagpilotohioJagpilotohio 45+ inch drivers are evil. Columbus, OHMembers Posts: 7,224 ✭✭
    Socrates wrote:

    KMeloney wrote:

    Socrates wrote:


    The whole idea is to have the ball go where you want it to go. The ball doesn't care about the divot pattern.




    With all due respect, I know that the ball doesn't care. I care, though, because as long as I'm led to believe that I can improve ball contact by having the iron enter the turf uniformly, then I have to wonder if I should address my lie-angles. (If lie angles aren't important, then why are they ever considered?)



    If the answer is that an upright lie will always make the ball go more left, then it sounds like a bad idea. But, if the answer is that by getting the lie correct I could dramatically improve contact such that it might actually correct (or at least override) some of my current left tendencies, then I should probably look into it further.


    Sounds like you are trying to convince yourself to fix something that ain’t broke. Lie angles are important, but the important part is the relationship of the club head at impact and not after. And the divot happens after impact.




    Oh no You didn’t. You brought up the “divot happens after impact” fact. Are we betting on How many posts until someone swears that’s not true?



    “No way man! If your club is too flat that toe digs in before you hit the ball and it opens the face! Everyone knows that!”.... Lol. Every time.
    9.5* Cobra LTD, Old school Grafalloy Blue, 43.5"
    14* Cally 815 alpha fuji 665 X 42"
    16* Cally 815 alpha fuji 665 X, 41.5" (set to 17*)
    19* Titleist 816 H2 fuji 8.8X TS 40.0"
    4-7 2016 Hogan PTx, KBS Tour V, 120X.  
    Ping i210 8 & 9 Proto 125 F5 hardstepped 1x.
    Ping glide 2 46-12, 50-12, 54-14 (at 55) stealth, Vokey SM6 60M (61). Wedges Recoil Proto 125 F5
    33.5" Ghost spider slant neck.
    Srixon Z-star XV
    Jones Trouper Bag
  • rexrohrexroh Members Posts: 438 ✭✭
    Why not get one club adjusted and see what happens. It can always be put back to original lie.
  • A.PrinceyA.Princey Major Hacker Members Posts: 2,162 ✭✭
    edited Jun 14, 2018 #19
    I noticed I needed more upright angles when I found that I couldn't hit off tight range mats very consistently, and the toe was always melting the green fiber. Trust me, I fought a hook and never found that bending my clubs, upright appreciably, ever really exacerbated the problem. Better contact allowed me to fix the issue, something that just wasn't possible before
    Post edited by Unknown User on
    '16 M2 10.5*, Diamana Ltd. 70 S+ 43.5"
    Ping G SFT 16*, DIamana Ltd. 70 S+ 41.5"
    Ping Rapture 3i, AWT-R
    Ping G25 4-G, DG-R400
    Vokey 56(57*), 60(63*) DG-R400
    Byron DH89 Longneck 33" (or any of 10 4 other putters...)
  • LEO MODELEO MODE Members Posts: 146 ✭✭
    I am exactly like OP and i am very close to getting a new iron set possibly with 2degrees upright.



    However I was told by a Titleist fitter : “i think you should go with a standard lie and just fix your swing to a proper position because your club path is open.”



    I now think that perhaps I should fix my swing. I don’t know the handicap of the OP but with my skills having a consistent swing will yield me better swing than bending 2 degrees upright which wouldn’t make that much of a difference to my current consistency.

    http://leomode.home.blog

    Reviewing all golf techs

    TrackMan 4, GC2+HMT, GC Quad
  • Howard JonesHoward Jones Members Posts: 8,564 ✭✭
    Lie boards is useless, take a ballmarker test.



    Lie board marks or deep divot toe side is most likely a face closed to path at impact, and when you close up too much, you got a hook.



    Take a look at your hands at address, i think you might have a grip where tje righr
  • Howard JonesHoward Jones Members Posts: 8,564 ✭✭
    edited Jun 14, 2018 #22
    Lie boards is useless, take a ballmarker test.



    Lie board marks or deep divot toe side is most likely a face closed to path at impact, and when you close up too much, you got a hook.



    Take a look at your hands at address, i think you might have a grip where the right hand is "to strong", causing you to close up to much when your timing gets off.



    We count 1* too much upright to make a tilt on the spin axis of 3*



    We get the same tilt of 3* with a face angle of 1*closed to path, so when our right hand becomes to active, we can by ease close it 3-4 to path, and then we are out to the left with a hook, even with correct lie.



    Get lie angles done, and check your lower hand at adr.
  • KMeloneyKMeloney Members Posts: 4,755 ✭✭
    Socrates wrote:


    Sounds like you are trying to convince yourself to fix something that ain’t broke. Lie angles are important, but the important part is the relationship of the club head at impact and not after. And the divot happens after impact.




    Not at all. I'm hoping to rule it out, actually, since I'd have to pay someone to do it, would potentially be without my clubs for some time, and maybe have it be a disaster that I'd have to undo after. Really just looking for info from those in the know.



    ...And, sadly, my divots aren't always after the ball! Haha (But, yes, we're talking about after-the-ball divots here.)
  • KMeloneyKMeloney Members Posts: 4,755 ✭✭
    Fireballer wrote:


    Are you delivering the club with high hands? That will certainly make the head toe down at impact.




    I think so. I'm working on it, though.

    A.Princey wrote:


    I noticed I needed more upright angles when I found that I couldn't hit off tight range mats very consistently, and the toe was always melting the green fiber. Trust me, I fought a hook and never found that bending my clubs, upright appreciably, ever really exacerbated the problem. Better contact allowed me to fix the issue, something that just wasn't possible before




    This notion is at the heart of my question.
  • KMeloneyKMeloney Members Posts: 4,755 ✭✭


    Lie boards is useless, take a ballmarker test.



    Lie board marks or deep divot toe side is most likely a face closed to path at impact, and when you close up too much, you got a hook.



    Take a look at your hands at address, i think you might have a grip where the right hand is "to strong", causing you to close up to much when your timing gets off.



    We count 1* too much upright to make a tilt on the spin axis of 3*



    We get the same tilt of 3* with a face angle of 1*closed to path, so when our right hand becomes to active, we can by ease close it 3-4 to path, and then we are out to the left with a hook, even with correct lie.



    Get lie angles done, and check your lower hand at adr.




    My grip is definitely strong, and I know that that's the major contributor to the left tendency and miss. No doubt.
  • SocratesSocrates How can it be so *&#% hard to make a shoulder turn? WinnipegClubWRX Posts: 9,236 ClubWRX
    Okay. Now we are getting at the root of the issue. The symptom is toe down and the cause is likely grip and swing orientated. Sounds like you need to fix the grip issue first and then see what changes have occurred. As always, seeking professional help is the best route. They can best guide you in what needs to be done and in what order.
    Ping G400 9º TFC 419 Stiff at 45"
    Cobra F8 5-6 Fwy at 18.5° Stiff
    Ping i20 3 Hyb 707H Stiff
    X2 Hot 4_-PW Recoil 660 F3 +1/2"
    Ping Forged 52°, ES 56º and ES 60º
    Ping Sigma2 Valor at 34.5"
    MCC Align Midsize
    Moving to the bench:
    Jazz Bear Cat 3 wd Aerotech Stiff
    Vokey SM2 52º cc
    Scotty X7M Dual 38"
  • Howard JonesHoward Jones Members Posts: 8,564 ✭✭
    Not toe down, all it takes is a face closed to path.



    Just imagine a closed face entering the ball, what part of the club will be in front and make turf contact first? Toe side is the answer
  • FireballerFireballer Members Posts: 387 ✭✭
    KMeloney wrote:

    Fireballer wrote:


    Are you delivering the club with high hands? That will certainly make the head toe down at impact.




    I think so. I'm working on it, though.


    A.Princey wrote:


    I noticed I needed more upright angles when I found that I couldn't hit off tight range mats very consistently, and the toe was always melting the green fiber. Trust me, I fought a hook and never found that bending my clubs, upright appreciably, ever really exacerbated the problem. Better contact allowed me to fix the issue, something that just wasn't possible before




    This notion is at the heart of my question.




    I tried about 15 years ago to play with lie angles because of heavy green plastic on the toe after range sessions. I tried all the way to +4 degrees, stiffer shafts, and relatively little change except hating the way the toe set way up at address.



    Things finally changed when I learned what early extension was and how it was causing me to deliver with hands high and toe down. Things practically changed overnight.
  • BearinthewoodsBearinthewoods ClubWRX Posts: 182 ClubWRX
    Fireballer wrote:

    KMeloney wrote:

    Fireballer wrote:


    Are you delivering the club with high hands? That will certainly make the head toe down at impact.




    I think so. I'm working on it, though.


    A.Princey wrote:


    I noticed I needed more upright angles when I found that I couldn't hit off tight range mats very consistently, and the toe was always melting the green fiber. Trust me, I fought a hook and never found that bending my clubs, upright appreciably, ever really exacerbated the problem. Better contact allowed me to fix the issue, something that just wasn't possible before




    This notion is at the heart of my question.




    I tried about 15 years ago to play with lie angles because of heavy green plastic on the toe after range sessions. I tried all the way to +4 degrees, stiffer shafts, and relatively little change except hating the way the toe set way up at address.



    Things finally changed when I learned what early extension was and how it was causing me to deliver with hands high and toe down. Things practically changed overnight.




    I like this answer- might not be OP's problem, but it was mine. I would also feel the face want to crank open from hitting the ground with thetoe first.



    Any issue with this OP?
    Driver; Ping G400 8.5* LST, Oban Devotion 65 06
    Fairway: Titleist 910 FD 15* Aldila Rip 80x
    Irons: Miura CB 57 Project X6.5 5-PW, Titleist TMB 4 & 3 w/ UST Recoil 125X Protos
    Wedges: Miura K grind 52*, 56*, 60* & Ping 2.0 Glide stealth wedges
    Putter: Bettinardi Queen Bee 6
  • KMeloneyKMeloney Members Posts: 4,755 ✭✭
    Yeah, I'm sure that's part of it. Working on the swing weekly. Thanks, folks!
  • CwebbCwebb Members Posts: 5,877 ✭✭
    Another option, especially if you do decide to go more upright, is to start with an open face at address. Lots of good players do not set the face "square" to the target line behind the ball, but instead go with an open face that plays more "neutral".



    Jack Nicklaus said that in his experience, most good players use a somewhat open face at address. Here's an article on it....https://www.golfdigest.com/story/jimflick_0707
Sign In or Register to comment.