Bryson dechambeau...anyone changing their setup and swing due to his success?

2

Comments

  • eebombeebomb Members Posts: 545 ✭✭
    pwahmy wrote:

    JD3 wrote:
    Not me. Not now anyway
    the guy is a literal genius no way to copy him (for me at least) without having his intelligence + talent
    He's as much of a genius as he is an NFL linebacker
  • BB28403BB28403 Members Posts: 3,645 ✭✭
    Hellllllllllllllll Noooooo
  • NoTalentLeftyNoTalentLefty Members Posts: 3,456 ✭✭
    No but it’s a sound swing.
    Livin' proof that Lefties are not naturally talented.

    Driver Titleist 913 D3 44 inches also a Cleveland Classic 310 43.5 inches
    3 and 5 Wood Ping G15
    3-5 Hybrids Cobra Baffler XL
    6-GW Titleist AP1s
    53 degree Wedge Titleist AP1
    58 degree SW Vokey SM6
    Putter White Hot V LINE Fang w/round Edel Grip
  • ObeeObee ClubWRX Posts: 3,716 ClubWRX
    pwahmy wrote:

    Obee wrote:
    pwahmy wrote:

    JD3 wrote:
    Not me. Not now anyway
    the guy is a literal genius no way to copy him (for me at least) without having his intelligence + talent




    You're kidding, right?



    His mental prowess as a math/science whiz (which may or may not be genius-level) has nothing to do with his golf swing and the fact that he uses a set of (mostly) same-length clubs.



    Anybody can try to emulate that swing -- and many people would probably have solid results by incorporating some/most/all of what he does. Some would hate it, of course.
    I believe you skipped over the “(for me at least)” it may work for a lot of people but too much thinking and would drive myself crazy. Have a good one




    I still don't get it. What about his swing makes you have to "think" more? Not trying to be a jerk, just totally don't get that.
    PING G400 Max - Tour 65 S
    Callaway Rogue 15* 3W
    Titleist H1 19* Diamana S+ Blue 70hy
    Titleist H1 23* Diamana S+ Blue 70hy
    Adams Idea Tech V4 5H 25* ProLaunch Blue 75 HY
    Adams Idea Tech V4 6H 28* ProLaunch Blue 75 HY
    Adams Idea Tech V4 7H 32* ProLaunch Blue 75 HY
    Titleist AP2 716 8i 37* KBS Tour S
    Titleist AP2 716 9i 42* KBS Tour S
    Don Wood Custom Grind 47* PW
    Don Wood Custom Grind 51* GW
    Titleist "Vokey Design" 56* K Grind
    Mizuno S18 60/7 LW
    Odyssey Works Versa Tank 1W (bent to 78.5*)
  • JasonicJasonic Gamer Banned Posts: 3,571 ✭✭
    edited Sep 4, 2018 #36
    I thought his whole thing was to take variable out so not to think



    And no he’s not on a freaking “genius level” with physics. Just stop. When he annoyingly named back muscles that were tight earlier in the year he actually incorrectly named muscles. It’s a facade.
    2017 M1 440 9.5* - Tensei Pro Orange 70TX
    TM M3 3 wood - 14.25* - Tensei Pro White 80TX
    Srixon u45 DI - 19* - Tensei Pro White Hybrid 100TX
    Mizuno mp18 4-PW - Nippon Modus3 120x
    Hogan TK wedges - 50*, 54*, 58* - Nippon Modus3 120x
    Ping Anser OG
    Snell MTB Black
  • gamesgames Argue for your limitations and they are yours. WisconsinMembers Posts: 1,705 ✭✭
    Jasonic wrote:


    I thought his whole thing was to take variable out so not to think



    And no he's not on a freaking "genius level" with physics. Just stop. When he annoyingly named back muscles that were tight earlier in the year he actually incorrectly named muscles. It's a facade.




    So, he's not a PHYSICS genius because he uses incorrect ANATOMY terminology.



    Thanks for playing...

    image/crazy.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':crazy:' />
  • BB28403BB28403 Members Posts: 3,645 ✭✭
    games wrote:
    Jasonic wrote:


    I thought his whole thing was to take variable out so not to think



    And no he's not on a freaking "genius level" with physics. Just stop. When he annoyingly named back muscles that were tight earlier in the year he actually incorrectly named muscles. It's a facade.




    So, he's not a PHYSICS genius because he uses incorrect ANATOMY terminology.



    Thanks for playing...

    image/crazy.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':crazy:' />




    No, thank you for playing Spot the Snake Oil Salesman!

    You lost btw. No Conciliation prizes. Sorry
  • Redjeep83Redjeep83 Members Posts: 5,133 ✭✭
    He takes his swing more across the line at the top these days vs what he use to. It was very much on a single plane years ago and the shaft would kinda topple a bit over the top on the downswing. I think he started taking it more across the line to help his plane on the downswing be more from the inside and it's obviously helped.
  • JagpilotohioJagpilotohio 45+ inch drivers are evil. Columbus, OHMembers Posts: 7,223 ✭✭
    pwahmy wrote:

    JD3 wrote:
    Not me. Not now anyway
    the guy is a literal genius no way to copy him (for me at least) without having his intelligence + talent




    I’d say he leans more toward idiot savant than genius.





    ....but he’s definitely very gifted with golf clubs.
    9.5* Cobra LTD, Old school Grafalloy Blue, 43.5"
    14* Cally 815 alpha fuji 665 X 42"
    16* Cally 815 alpha fuji 665 X, 41.5" (set to 17*)
    19* Titleist 816 H2 fuji 8.8X TS 40.0"
    4-7 2016 Hogan PTx, KBS Tour V, 120X.  
    Ping i210 8 & 9 Proto 125 F5 hardstepped 1x.
    Ping glide 2 46-12, 50-12, 54-14 (at 55) stealth, Vokey SM6 60M (61). Wedges Recoil Proto 125 F5
    33.5" Ghost spider slant neck.
    Srixon Z-star XV
    Jones Trouper Bag
  • LeoLeo99LeoLeo99 Members Posts: 3,990 ✭✭
    Two things I pretty much know to be true.



    1. There are people on this site that are smarter than Bryson.

    2. There is no one on this site that is better at golf than Bryson.



    35 years ago, my cousin and I were discussing Moe Norman and his unique golf swing. My cousin dismissed Moe as a savant. Nothing to do with Moe's personality; just his golf swing.



    Now, 35 years later, we have another savant. Except this one can putt.
  • SullGolfSullGolf Members Posts: 8,767 ✭✭
    In terms of equipment? I'm trying out single-length now. Not directly because of him, but indirectly certainly. There are now manufacturers making single length clubs, and I have friends who've then used them and said good things. That part is no different than how I figure out most of my impulse purchase.



    In terms of my swing? No. The way I look at him is that he took an analytical approach and figured out what works for him. If I did the same, I likely wouldn't end up doing it the same way as he does.
  • When I think 'genius' especially in sports I think extraordinary innate talent. Bryson's main advantage seems to be an obsessive, meticulous and methodical approach to creating a simple, repeatable swing that works for him. Just because he uses numbers and tinkers with new techniques all the time doesn't make him a genius, but it does indicate a systematic drive for efficiency and improvement, and whether you like his swing or not, you can't deny that this approach is admirable. Definitely good for the game and for inspiring youngsters imo.
  • gamesgames Argue for your limitations and they are yours. WisconsinMembers Posts: 1,705 ✭✭


    When I think 'genius' especially in sports I think extraordinary innate talent. Bryson's main advantage seems to be an obsessive, meticulous and methodical approach to creating a simple, repeatable swing that works for him. Just because he uses numbers and tinkers with new techniques all the time doesn't make him a genius, but it does indicate a systematic drive for efficiency and improvement, and whether you like his swing or not, you can't deny that this approach is admirable. Definitely good for the game and for inspiring youngsters imo.




    Well said. This thread should conclude with your post.
  • JasonicJasonic Gamer Banned Posts: 3,571 ✭✭
    games wrote:

    Jasonic wrote:


    I thought his whole thing was to take variable out so not to think



    And no he's not on a freaking "genius level" with physics. Just stop. When he annoyingly named back muscles that were tight earlier in the year he actually incorrectly named muscles. It's a facade.




    So, he's not a PHYSICS genius because he uses incorrect ANATOMY terminology.



    Thanks for playing...

    image/crazy.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':crazy:' />




    The point is if you’re trying to be the smartest guy in the room it helps to actually know what you’re talking about. When you don’t, you’re just an idiot.
    2017 M1 440 9.5* - Tensei Pro Orange 70TX
    TM M3 3 wood - 14.25* - Tensei Pro White 80TX
    Srixon u45 DI - 19* - Tensei Pro White Hybrid 100TX
    Mizuno mp18 4-PW - Nippon Modus3 120x
    Hogan TK wedges - 50*, 54*, 58* - Nippon Modus3 120x
    Ping Anser OG
    Snell MTB Black
  • nyrican52884nyrican52884 Members Posts: 89 ✭✭
    edited Sep 5, 2018 #46
    I'm a huge fan of Bryson. I'm an engineer, so I'm analytical as well. About a year ago, I was messing around with the single plane Moe Norman swing, and I really like the idea of having hands high at setup and the trail arm aligned with club at setup, it has always worked for me from when I first started playing, just could never find someone that did the same and willing to recommend it.



    I got away from the Moe Norman swing, because I could not get my head around some of his mechanics, but I did stay with the hand grip and high hands at address. I started doing more research and found out about BDC and started watching some of Kirk Junge's Setup 4 Impact videos. I'm not a paid subscriber of his and he definitely pushes his website way too much, but for the most part I'm following his swing principles with great success. It just makes sense to me and works for me. I'm not saying it works for everyone.



    I did go to Top Golf a few weeks ago with some people that never hit a club and showed them this method (grip in the hands, trail arm inline with club shaft, turn body back and forth), and was getting some of them (including my wife) to make contact and get the ball to go straight. I think its a simplified swing that makes sense, but so many of us have been playing for so long, it would be difficult to change.



    One thing I have found that works for me is pre-setting my body for the backswing. I get into impact position, and then settle into setup position, and then turn my shoulders and hips a bit as I would in the backswing, but keeping the hands in place (sometimes even adding in some forward shaft lean). I've never taped myself and I'm sure it looks strage, but works for me.



    I believe we'll have a new generation of golfers that will model their swing after him, but we'll need to wait 20 years to see.
  • gators78gators78 ClubWRX Posts: 3,917 ClubWRX
    pwahmy wrote:

    JD3 wrote:
    Not me. Not now anyway
    the guy is a literal genius no way to copy him (for me at least) without having his intelligence + talent




    Never qualified for Academic All American status, which requires you to play at least 50% of matches (check), maintain a stroke average below 76 (check) and a GPA of at least 3.2 (hmmmmmm).
    G400 Max
    M2 3W, Hybrid
    Arias
    SM7s
    Sigma 2, Tyne 4
  • jgonz69jgonz69 Members Posts: 752 ✭✭
    gators78 wrote:

    pwahmy wrote:

    JD3 wrote:
    Not me. Not now anyway
    the guy is a literal genius no way to copy him (for me at least) without having his intelligence + talent




    Never qualified for Academic All American status, which requires you to play at least 50% of matches (check), maintain a stroke average below 76 (check) and a GPA of at least 3.2 (hmmmmmm).
    link?
    PING G400 Max Ping Tour 65
    PING G400 3wd 14.5 Ping Tour 75
    PING G400 Hybrid Ping Tour 85
    PING i500 3, 5-U
    PING Glide 2.0 Stealth 54 58
    Cameron MilSpec 350g
    Srixon Z-Star XV
  • Krt22Krt22 Members Posts: 6,504 ✭✭
    Im going to lift like brooks, set up like BAD, bow my wrist like DJ at the top, pause like Hideki, then fire my hips like Rory. I'll be on tour in no time!
  • tdk8180tdk8180 Members Posts: 2,405 ✭✭
  • LeoLeo99LeoLeo99 Members Posts: 3,990 ✭✭
    Krt22 wrote:


    Im going to lift like brooks, set up like BAD, bow my wrist like DJ at the top, pause like Hideki, then fire my hips like Rory. I'll be on tour in no time!




    No love for Furyk? Mr. 58.
  • NoTalentLeftyNoTalentLefty Members Posts: 3,456 ✭✭
    edited Feb 2, 2019 4:50pm #52
    No but it’s a sound swing.




    I changed my mind. Yes, to a degree that I can.

    When a straight drive is called for, I have already tried raising my hands on the driver for years.
    Post edited by Unknown User on
    Livin' proof that Lefties are not naturally talented.

    Driver Titleist 913 D3 44 inches also a Cleveland Classic 310 43.5 inches
    3 and 5 Wood Ping G15
    3-5 Hybrids Cobra Baffler XL
    6-GW Titleist AP1s
    53 degree Wedge Titleist AP1
    58 degree SW Vokey SM6
    Putter White Hot V LINE Fang w/round Edel Grip
  • NPVWhizNPVWhiz Members Posts: 1,976 ✭✭
    Honestly, no amount of success from an unorthodox player would send me along that path. Furyk, Wolff, BAD all have some way of converting their intentions with the swing into solid centered ball impact. That is the only thing that seems to matter in the long run.
    Taylormade r11s 9 Penley Stealth 70x 44.5" D-3
    > Taylormade 16 M1 8.5 GD AD TP6x 44.0" D3 PX Hzrdus Black 75 6.0 44.5" D-3
    Nickent 3DX Pro 14 MRC Diamana WB 83s
    Hybrid: Adams Idea Pro 18 Grafalloy CNote ProtoX
    Mizuno MP62 DG x-100 Sensicore D-4 3-pw
    > Ping i200 DG120 S3 D-3 +1/4" Red 4-U.
    Vokey SM6 56-14/60-04M DG x-100 Sensicore 1xss D-5
    > Vokey SM6 56/10 60/4M DG 120 S300 35" D-5
    Scotty Golo
  • MychMych Members Posts: 1,816 ✭✭
    Not necessarily changing to copy him, but his theories and application of physics validate a lot of things that I have observed (and usually ignored) over the years. Being an engineer, I think in a very process and mechanically-oriented manner, so I have been much more open to thinking through the physics and trying things that make sense without always deferring to the conventional wisdom. I have moved to single-length irons with great results, but I think of Bryson as a great source of data which I can use to better understand the things I observe.
    "Of all the hazards, fear is the worst" - Sam Snead
    Main bag: Cobra Fly-Z 10.5*~ F6 Baffler 4-5w ~ Mizuno JPX Fli-Hi 3H ~ King Utility ~ King Forged One 4-P ~ King 50-V, 56-V wedges ~ Nike MC-02W
    6 club minimalist: Cobra King Utility ~ Forged One 5/7/9 ~ Cleveland 588 Diadic 53* wedge ~ Nike MC-02W ~ Silo Club Carrier
  • jasonfish11jasonfish11 Members Posts: 429 ✭✭
    I'm trying to emulate his impact position and club head speed at impact.



    I don't care how I get there, but if I can copy those 2 things I'd be very happy.
  • Man_O_WarMan_O_War Members Posts: 2,752 ✭✭
    a lot of amateurs actually set up like Bryson. no angle between the wrist and arms..and no wrist hinge...so his swing and power makes no sense to me. oh and he has dwarf shafted irons, same length...his driver and woods are long though.
    Cobra LTD PRO/LTD BLACK  Matrix F6M2/F7M3/Project X LZ 6.0 71g HC/ Fuji 661 III
    Cobra LTD 3/4 Kai'li 80
    Cobra LTD 4/5 Kai'li 80
    TM Mid_Rescue TP 22*
    Cobra Fly Z  Pro Irons Modus 120x SSx2 4-pw
    RTX 3.0 50, 54, 60 Modus 125
    Machine LN M6
  • BrandonDunesBrandonDunes Members Posts: 334 ✭✭
    Yeah he's got me talking more about the coefficient of restitution to my golf buddies in regards to leaving the flag in, so now I sound very smart.
    Driver - Callaway Epic SZ 10.5º
    3W - Taylor Made Jetspeed HL º17
    H - Callaway Xhot Pro 23º
    Irons - Mizuno JPX919 Hotmetal 5-PW
    GW - Callaway MD3 (S-48º)
    SW - Callaway MD3 (S-52º)
    LW - Callaway MD3 (W-58º)
    Putter - Odyssey O-Works 2-Ball
  • SparklehorseSparklehorse Members Posts: 34 ✭✭
    If he wanted to , couldn't one suspect he'd be just as successful using other swing styles with different length clubs (he looks quite an athlete)?
  • MonteScheinblumMonteScheinblum Rebellion Golf Sponsors Posts: 18,233 ✭✭


    If he wanted to , couldn't one suspect he'd be just as successful using other swing styles with different length clubs (he looks quite an athlete)?




    Bingo
  • bluedotbluedot Members Posts: 3,386 ✭✭


    Golf instruction needs to STOP making great players about their anomalies.




    Amen! I think this is the correct takeaway, at least at this point. And that in NO way should be taken as diminishing what Dechambeau has done.



    I spent 39 years as a high school coach in multiple sports. I think there are three critical things to keep in mind for Everyman as you watch a pro in any sport who is doing something unusual.



    1. We only know what that pro is accomplishing the way they are doing things; we do NOT know what they would be doing were they playing in a more "conventional" manner. There is a large gray area in between "because of" and "in spite of", and it is really hard to know where the lines are.



    2. And, in any case, Everyman's ability to replicate what a professional athlete is doing is limited.



    3. The more unconventional what a professional athlete is doing is, relative to other professionals in that sport, the LESS likely that is to be helpful to Everyman. Azinger and Duval played a fade from very strong grips; doesn't mean I can or should.
  • gamesgames Argue for your limitations and they are yours. WisconsinMembers Posts: 1,705 ✭✭


    If he wanted to , couldn't one suspect he'd be just as successful using other swing styles with different length clubs (he looks quite an athlete)?




    Nope. He doesn't want to golf any other way. His mind wouldn't let him.



    He is the original DBOM golfer. (Design, build, operate, maintain.)

    He has confidence in operating the system he built and designed.

    He knows how to maintain it, and when it breaks (which it has) he has shown he can fix it.



    I think it's similar to a sharpshooter's "aim small, miss small" mentality.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file