Best Driver of 2019 | Full Article _HERE_ | Discussion Thread _HERE_

New TP5 and TP5X

1141517192022
22

Comments

  • Holy MosesHoly Moses  10577Members Posts: 10,577
    Joined:  #482
    Early reports were that this ball was amazing. Actual testing says that there is little to no improvement over past years. What made Rickie switch?
    Posted:
    Ping G30 LS Tec 10* (DI-6X)
    Ping G30 3W 14.5* (DI-7X)
    Ping G400 Crossover 19* (Tensei CK Pro Blue 80 S)
    Ping i20 4-UW (PX 6.0)
    Ping Glide 2.0 56*SS, 60*ES (PX 6.0)
    Ping Vault Arna
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • tommys103tommys103  3Members Posts: 3
    Joined:  #483
    I tinkered with the older TP5 and TP5X and loved the distance but couldn't get past the control around the greens. Was hoping this new version was improved but from the sounds of it, it isn't.
    Posted:
  • CDMCDM  1884Members Posts: 1,884
    Joined:  #484
    Holy Moses wrote:


    Early reports were that this ball was amazing. Actual testing says that there is little to no improvement over past years. What made Rickie switch?




    I switched from the ProV / X to the TP models a few years ago and I did see better results for my game. I think its like clubs, without getting the right fit its not the best for you. I am sure Ricky saw something during the Ryder Cup when he played the ball that he liked better. I moved over becuase I did gain distance off the tee with the TP models over ProV's. Everything else was very similar. ProV does have just a bit better feel. *Honestly I could game either with my limited skills image/tongue.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':tongue:' /> but settle on the TP more....
    Posted:
  • scratchswingerscratchswinger  16312Members Posts: 16,312
    Joined:  #485
    CDM wrote:

    Holy Moses wrote:


    Early reports were that this ball was amazing. Actual testing says that there is little to no improvement over past years. What made Rickie switch?




    I switched from the ProV / X to the TP models a few years ago and I did see better results for my game. I think its like clubs, without getting the right fit its not the best for you. I am sure Ricky saw something during the Ryder Cup when he played the ball that he liked better. I moved over becuase I did gain distance off the tee with the TP models over ProV's. Everything else was very similar. ProV does have just a bit better feel. *Honestly I could game either with my limited skills image/tongue.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':tongue:' /> but settle on the TP more....




    All about money my friend....
    Posted:
  • scratchswingerscratchswinger  16312Members Posts: 16,312
    Joined:  #486
    Stanks wrote:

    Holy Moses wrote:


    Early reports were that this ball was amazing. Actual testing says that there is little to no improvement over past years. What made Rickie switch?




    The ball is amazing in comparison to the PROv1. Anyone that knows me know how outspoken I am against the prov1 line. A 3 piece ball isn't worth the price they're selling at. Same with the V1x. The taylormade ball is cheaper and reacts better.



    It is all about the $€£¥. I think, when the rest of my ball stash is gone (8 dozen RZN platinum, 1 dozen Snell, 3 TP5/x, 2 dozen KSIG on and on) then I'll go MTB X. Cheap and performs. By then, TP5 will be on sale




    No offense but if your handicap is really a 15 I don't think any ball will make much of a difference. You can really only see the difference in these balls when you strike it solid and mainly from 120 and in (especially around the greens). If you gave a 0 handicap 6 balls of each PV1 and TP5X and watched them hit different shots around the green you could easily see and also hear a very big difference between these balls. I have tried for years to beat the V1 and V1X and can't seem to ever do it.
    Posted:
  • UncleJohn’sBandUncleJohn’sBand  1024Members Posts: 1,024
    Joined:  #487

    Stanks wrote:

    Holy Moses wrote:


    Early reports were that this ball was amazing. Actual testing says that there is little to no improvement over past years. What made Rickie switch?




    The ball is amazing in comparison to the PROv1. Anyone that knows me know how outspoken I am against the prov1 line. A 3 piece ball isn't worth the price they're selling at. Same with the V1x. The taylormade ball is cheaper and reacts better.



    It is all about the $¤£¥. I think, when the rest of my ball stash is gone (8 dozen RZN platinum, 1 dozen Snell, 3 TP5/x, 2 dozen KSIG on and on) then I'll go MTB X. Cheap and performs. By then, TP5 will be on sale




    No offense but if your handicap is really a 15 I don't think any ball will make much of a difference. You can really only see the difference in these balls when you strike it solid and mainly from 120 and in (especially around the greens). If you gave a 0 handicap 6 balls of each PV1 and TP5X and watched them hit different shots around the green you could easily see and also hear a very big difference between these balls. I have tried for years to beat the V1 and V1X and can't seem to ever do it.




    I did that very comparison and found the TP5 to be miles better than the Pro V for me. Just all about preferences in what you want to feel, hear and see.



    The new ball isn't the cure for cancer, btw, it's just a good solid ball.
    Posted:
    Titleist 915 D3 Speeder vc 7.2 tour spec
    Titleist 910 F Rombax W
    Titleist 913hd Matrix Altus
    Titleist 714 CB/MB 4-Pw PjX 6.5
    Tour issue 52, 56 60 Vokey 200 SM4
    Odyssey Versa no. 7
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • chris975dchris975d Georgia 1954ClubWRX Posts: 1,954
    Joined:  #488
    Stanks wrote:

    Holy Moses wrote:


    Early reports were that this ball was amazing. Actual testing says that there is little to no improvement over past years. What made Rickie switch?




    The ball is amazing in comparison to the PROv1. Anyone that knows me know how outspoken I am against the prov1 line. A 3 piece ball isn't worth the price they're selling at. Same with the V1x. The taylormade ball is cheaper and reacts better.



    It is all about the $€£¥. I think, when the rest of my ball stash is gone (8 dozen RZN platinum, 1 dozen Snell, 3 TP5/x, 2 dozen KSIG on and on) then I'll go MTB X. Cheap and performs. By then, TP5 will be on sale




    No offense but if your handicap is really a 15 I don't think any ball will make much of a difference. You can really only see the difference in these balls when you strike it solid and mainly from 120 and in (especially around the greens). If you gave a 0 handicap 6 balls of each PV1 and TP5X and watched them hit different shots around the green you could easily see and also hear a very big difference between these balls. I have tried for years to beat the V1 and V1X and can't seem to ever do it.




    I've seen different from that. As a ball retailer/course operator, almost every single customer that I've watched play/hit golf balls that was playing a ProV1 family ball that I've recommended something else to, typically a TaylorMade, Srixon, or Bridgestone tour level ball, has all switched away from Titleist because they like the new ball more and play better with it. To the point that I don't even stock Titliest anymore (which is almost unimaginable for a proshop), and my premium level ball sales have actually increased. ProV1s definitely aren't the best ball for everyone, not even lower handicap golfers. I've got way too many years of witnessing this with thousands of golfers for that to be true.
    Posted:
    TaylorMade 9* M5 w/GD AD-IZ 6
    TaylorMade M5 3-wood
    TaylorMade M5 5-wood
    Srixon H85 4
    Srixon 5-PW, AW Z585 w/Project X LZ 6.0
    Cleveland RTX4 54*, 58*
    TaylorMade Spider X Copper
  • scratchswingerscratchswinger  16312Members Posts: 16,312
    Joined:  #489
    JackStraw2 wrote:


    Stanks wrote:

    Holy Moses wrote:


    Early reports were that this ball was amazing. Actual testing says that there is little to no improvement over past years. What made Rickie switch?




    The ball is amazing in comparison to the PROv1. Anyone that knows me know how outspoken I am against the prov1 line. A 3 piece ball isn't worth the price they're selling at. Same with the V1x. The taylormade ball is cheaper and reacts better.



    It is all about the $¤£¥. I think, when the rest of my ball stash is gone (8 dozen RZN platinum, 1 dozen Snell, 3 TP5/x, 2 dozen KSIG on and on) then I'll go MTB X. Cheap and performs. By then, TP5 will be on sale




    No offense but if your handicap is really a 15 I don't think any ball will make much of a difference. You can really only see the difference in these balls when you strike it solid and mainly from 120 and in (especially around the greens). If you gave a 0 handicap 6 balls of each PV1 and TP5X and watched them hit different shots around the green you could easily see and also hear a very big difference between these balls. I have tried for years to beat the V1 and V1X and can't seem to ever do it.




    I did that very comparison and found the TP5 to be miles better than the Pro V for me. Just all about preferences in what you want to feel, hear and see.



    The new ball isn't the cure for cancer, btw, it's just a good solid ball.




    Glad to hear you found a ball that fits your game. V1 wont work for everyone and TP5 won’t work for all.
    Posted:
  • Hammer22Hammer22  565Members Posts: 565
    Joined:  #490


    I guess I'm gonna have to keep my hopes up for a yellow version, then. We still haven't seen confirmation either way on that front.




    If you want yellow and like the TP5, just grab the '18 Project (a) - it's a very similar ball and a total sleeper. I put the (a) up against a handful of other "premium" balls and was very impressed. Was 7-8 yards longer with the irons and got about 1,000RPM more spin. Great feel as well. Even prompted me to move away from the RZN Platinum, which I thought would be impossible.
    Posted:
    nflam-button.png
  • scratchswingerscratchswinger  16312Members Posts: 16,312
    Joined:  #491
    Stanks wrote:


    Stanks wrote:

    Holy Moses wrote:


    Early reports were that this ball was amazing. Actual testing says that there is little to no improvement over past years. What made Rickie switch?




    The ball is amazing in comparison to the PROv1. Anyone that knows me know how outspoken I am against the prov1 line. A 3 piece ball isn't worth the price they're selling at. Same with the V1x. The taylormade ball is cheaper and reacts better.



    It is all about the $¤£¥. I think, when the rest of my ball stash is gone (8 dozen RZN platinum, 1 dozen Snell, 3 TP5/x, 2 dozen KSIG on and on) then I'll go MTB X. Cheap and performs. By then, TP5 will be on sale




    No offense but if your handicap is really a 15 I don't think any ball will make much of a difference. You can really only see the difference in these balls when you strike it solid and mainly from 120 and in (especially around the greens). If you gave a 0 handicap 6 balls of each PV1 and TP5X and watched them hit different shots around the green you could easily see and also hear a very big difference between these balls. I have tried for years to beat the V1 and V1X and can't seem to ever do it.




    I'm more off 18 right now actually. Fortunately for you, I can and do feel a difference. My score doesn't constitute the ability to see how a ball performs for me. I've played every style premium ball in the last 4-5 years. Yeah, I can feel a difference and see a difference.



    I'll go ahead and say that most of the balls used on tour are because of money and continued performance. That's just how it is. Taylormade might be paying rickie more. Bridgestone is paying tiger absurd amounts. Rory said he loved platinum RZN tour or black, which was produced by Bridgestone, but oh wait, he doesn't use that because TM pays him more.



    Long story short, a handicap doesn't mean s*** when judging performance. I'll tell people to buy this ball over titleist prov1 and x all day every day.




    I'm sorry but if you are an 18 handicap you are not making consistent enough solid contact to tell a difference. I would argue that most scratch or better players scores would not change over a 10 round average between the TP5 and ProV1. The differences between all these balls is very minor but at the end of the day can lead to a 3ft par putt versus a 4ft par putt which very well could be a stroke difference in score. Again this one foot difference is assuming you strike it well, if your chip it thin or fat it won't make a difference. I think the sound and feel is what changes the most between the balls and that just comes down to a comfort level.



    Of all the premium balls I tested this year the only very obvious noticeable difference I found (other then feel or sound) was the TP5 excessive spin on full wedges. Basically all the other balls have slight differences that really are not going to make or break you over a 10 round average. The TP5 I found that I have to play a lot of dead hand/ knock down wedge shots or account for the spin.
    Posted:
  • scratchswingerscratchswinger  16312Members Posts: 16,312
    Joined:  #492
    chris975d wrote:

    Stanks wrote:

    Holy Moses wrote:


    Early reports were that this ball was amazing. Actual testing says that there is little to no improvement over past years. What made Rickie switch?




    The ball is amazing in comparison to the PROv1. Anyone that knows me know how outspoken I am against the prov1 line. A 3 piece ball isn't worth the price they're selling at. Same with the V1x. The taylormade ball is cheaper and reacts better.



    It is all about the $€£¥. I think, when the rest of my ball stash is gone (8 dozen RZN platinum, 1 dozen Snell, 3 TP5/x, 2 dozen KSIG on and on) then I'll go MTB X. Cheap and performs. By then, TP5 will be on sale




    No offense but if your handicap is really a 15 I don't think any ball will make much of a difference. You can really only see the difference in these balls when you strike it solid and mainly from 120 and in (especially around the greens). If you gave a 0 handicap 6 balls of each PV1 and TP5X and watched them hit different shots around the green you could easily see and also hear a very big difference between these balls. I have tried for years to beat the V1 and V1X and can't seem to ever do it.




    I've seen different from that. As a ball retailer/course operator, almost every single customer that I've watched play/hit golf balls that was playing a ProV1 family ball that I've recommended something else to, typically a TaylorMade, Srixon, or Bridgestone tour level ball, has all switched away from Titleist because they like the new ball more and play better with it. To the point that I don't even stock Titliest anymore (which is almost unimaginable for a proshop), and my premium level ball sales have actually increased. ProV1s definitely aren't the best ball for everyone, not even lower handicap golfers. I've got way too many years of witnessing this with thousands of golfers for that to be true.




    I really like the Bstone X ball.... I just don't see the performance differences that you speak of, to me the V1 and V1X perform close to the same as all others but feel and sound a little softer around the greens and spin a little more, which I prefer. The Srixon and both TM balls have a noticeable click, the Bstone I would put in lines with the Titleist balls but as strange as it sounds I am not a fan of the Bstone dimple pattern. Again I think over a few round average the only thing that would change my score is how I am playing and the ball would have very little impact.
    Posted:
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • swizbeatzswizbeatz  5683Members Posts: 5,683
    Joined:  #493

    Stanks wrote:


    Stanks wrote:

    Holy Moses wrote:


    Early reports were that this ball was amazing. Actual testing says that there is little to no improvement over past years. What made Rickie switch?




    The ball is amazing in comparison to the PROv1. Anyone that knows me know how outspoken I am against the prov1 line. A 3 piece ball isn't worth the price they're selling at. Same with the V1x. The taylormade ball is cheaper and reacts better.



    It is all about the $¤£¥. I think, when the rest of my ball stash is gone (8 dozen RZN platinum, 1 dozen Snell, 3 TP5/x, 2 dozen KSIG on and on) then I'll go MTB X. Cheap and performs. By then, TP5 will be on sale




    No offense but if your handicap is really a 15 I don't think any ball will make much of a difference. You can really only see the difference in these balls when you strike it solid and mainly from 120 and in (especially around the greens). If you gave a 0 handicap 6 balls of each PV1 and TP5X and watched them hit different shots around the green you could easily see and also hear a very big difference between these balls. I have tried for years to beat the V1 and V1X and can't seem to ever do it.




    I'm more off 18 right now actually. Fortunately for you, I can and do feel a difference. My score doesn't constitute the ability to see how a ball performs for me. I've played every style premium ball in the last 4-5 years. Yeah, I can feel a difference and see a difference.



    I'll go ahead and say that most of the balls used on tour are because of money and continued performance. That's just how it is. Taylormade might be paying rickie more. Bridgestone is paying tiger absurd amounts. Rory said he loved platinum RZN tour or black, which was produced by Bridgestone, but oh wait, he doesn't use that because TM pays him more.



    Long story short, a handicap doesn't mean s*** when judging performance. I'll tell people to buy this ball over titleist prov1 and x all day every day.




    I'm sorry but if you are an 18 handicap you are not making consistent enough solid contact to tell a difference. I would argue that most scratch or better players scores would not change over a 10 round average between the TP5 and ProV1. The differences between all these balls is very minor but at the end of the day can lead to a 3ft par putt versus a 4ft par putt which very well could be a stroke difference in score. Again this one foot difference is assuming you strike it well, if your chip it thin or fat it won't make a difference. I think the sound and feel is what changes the most between the balls and that just comes down to a comfort level.



    Of all the premium balls I tested this year the only very obvious noticeable difference I found (other then feel or sound) was the TP5 excessive spin on full wedges. Basically all the other balls have slight differences that really are not going to make or break you over a 10 round average. The TP5 I found that I have to play a lot of dead hand/ knock down wedge shots or account for the spin.






    I’m the same, the biggest difference I see besides feel is with the highest lofted wedge. Most are similar still on full swings, it’s the 60 to green side yardages where some will noticeably spin less. Depending on your course conditions and the types of shots you prefer around the green you’ll have a different preference.



    Agree about your better player stance, I know some people won’t like to hear their opinion may not be as valuable but oh well, can’t make everyone happy.



    What do you do to test balls? I’ve been trying 5-6 models, I’ll putt, chip, hit 20-40 yard pitches, then take a flightscope out for 75 yard, full lob wedge, 8 iron, driver. Going to be adding long iron this year as lack of spin with 4/5 iron was an issue for me last year.
    Posted:
    Ping/Epon/Scratch/Bettinardi WITB Link
  • Hammer22Hammer22  565Members Posts: 565
    Joined:  #494
    Stanks wrote:


    I'll go ahead and say that most of the balls used on tour are because of money and continued performance. That's just how it is. Taylormade might be paying rickie more. Bridgestone is paying tiger absurd amounts. Rory said he loved platinum RZN tour or black, which was produced by Bridgestone, but oh wait, he doesn't use that because TM pays him more.




    Just as an FYI, Bridgestone stopped making balls for Nike when the RZN line rolled out. Before then yes, but not the final ones, which were made in Taiwan.




    I'm sorry but if you are an 18 handicap you are not making consistent enough solid contact to tell a difference. I would argue that most scratch or better players scores would not change over a 10 round average between the TP5 and ProV1. The differences between all these balls is very minor but at the end of the day can lead to a 3ft par putt versus a 4ft par putt which very well could be a stroke difference in score. Again this one foot difference is assuming you strike it well, if your chip it thin or fat it won't make a difference. I think the sound and feel is what changes the most between the balls and that just comes down to a comfort level.




    It's cool to see high index golfers spending $40-50 per dozen on premium balls - they make great finds on so many courses.
    Posted:
    nflam-button.png
  • chris975dchris975d Georgia 1954ClubWRX Posts: 1,954
    Joined:  edited Feb 27, 2019 12:14pm #495

    chris975d wrote:

    Stanks wrote:

    Holy Moses wrote:


    Early reports were that this ball was amazing. Actual testing says that there is little to no improvement over past years. What made Rickie switch?




    The ball is amazing in comparison to the PROv1. Anyone that knows me know how outspoken I am against the prov1 line. A 3 piece ball isn't worth the price they're selling at. Same with the V1x. The taylormade ball is cheaper and reacts better.



    It is all about the $€£¥. I think, when the rest of my ball stash is gone (8 dozen RZN platinum, 1 dozen Snell, 3 TP5/x, 2 dozen KSIG on and on) then I'll go MTB X. Cheap and performs. By then, TP5 will be on sale




    No offense but if your handicap is really a 15 I don't think any ball will make much of a difference. You can really only see the difference in these balls when you strike it solid and mainly from 120 and in (especially around the greens). If you gave a 0 handicap 6 balls of each PV1 and TP5X and watched them hit different shots around the green you could easily see and also hear a very big difference between these balls. I have tried for years to beat the V1 and V1X and can't seem to ever do it.




    I've seen different from that. As a ball retailer/course operator, almost every single customer that I've watched play/hit golf balls that was playing a ProV1 family ball that I've recommended something else to, typically a TaylorMade, Srixon, or Bridgestone tour level ball, has all switched away from Titleist because they like the new ball more and play better with it. To the point that I don't even stock Titliest anymore (which is almost unimaginable for a proshop), and my premium level ball sales have actually increased. ProV1s definitely aren't the best ball for everyone, not even lower handicap golfers. I've got way too many years of witnessing this with thousands of golfers for that to be true.




    I really like the Bstone X ball.... I just don't see the performance differences that you speak of, to me the V1 and V1X perform close to the same as all others but feel and sound a little softer around the greens and spin a little more, which I prefer. The Srixon and both TM balls have a noticeable click, the Bstone I would put in lines with the Titleist balls but as strange as it sounds I am not a fan of the Bstone dimple pattern. Again I think over a few round average the only thing that would change my score is how I am playing and the ball would have very little impact.




    No biggie, that's why they make different balls..people have different preferences. I just have rarely truly seen anyone enjoy going back to a ProV1 after making an actual true attempt to play literally almost any other tour caliber ball. I think it has a lot to do with people that play ProV1 typically have played it most of it's life (or their life), and are accustomed to its feel, sound, performance, etc. Hey...that's why Titleist does what they do...they've hooked people on it early (through various methods, I've mentioned them in other threads), and most people are creatures of habit. But those players that I've switched to a new ball and have played with it long enough to learn what it does (key point there...not just a round or two) almost always say it was the best thing they've done for their game, and wish they had done it sooner. Similar to when you get (just for kicks and giggles) a player who plays (and has played for a while) another tour caliber, non-ProV1 ball and ask them to play a ProV1...they usually report that they can't stand it/hate it, at least in my experience.



    I've been in the business since before the ProV1 came to market, and I just honestly have never seen anything great about that ball. Tried playing it many times, and it's definitely not the cost that's a concern for me...I'm in the golf business, and you can get as many of them as you want for free more or less. I just don't see it being a great ball. I don't consider it in the top 3 tour balls in terms of performance. That's an opinion I've developed during it's entire life, from my personal experiences and from discussions I've had with all the lower handicap, higher handicap, and tournament golfers I've encountered in my career.
    Posted:
    TaylorMade 9* M5 w/GD AD-IZ 6
    TaylorMade M5 3-wood
    TaylorMade M5 5-wood
    Srixon H85 4
    Srixon 5-PW, AW Z585 w/Project X LZ 6.0
    Cleveland RTX4 54*, 58*
    TaylorMade Spider X Copper
  • scratchswingerscratchswinger  16312Members Posts: 16,312
    Joined:  #496
    swizbeatz wrote:




    I'm the same, the biggest difference I see besides feel is with the highest lofted wedge. Most are similar still on full swings, it's the 60 to green side yardages where some will noticeably spin less. Depending on your course conditions and the types of shots you prefer around the green you'll have a different preference.



    Agree about your better player stance, I know some people won't like to hear their opinion may not be as valuable but oh well, can't make everyone happy.



    What do you do to test balls? I've been trying 5-6 models, I'll putt, chip, hit 20-40 yard pitches, then take a flightscope out for 75 yard, full lob wedge, 8 iron, driver. Going to be adding long iron this year as lack of spin with 4/5 iron was an issue for me last year.




    Lots of chipping and pitching on a good green where I can see the differences. Get onto an empty course that I know well, hit alternating shots of tee, fairway, onto greens, etc and see how it performs. If I mishit a shot I really not take that ball into account. If I see anything that needs to be verified I will hit some on a monitor but it's generally not needed.
    Posted:
  • scratchswingerscratchswinger  16312Members Posts: 16,312
    Joined:  #497
    Stanks wrote:


    I do suck but I know good balls. These are good balls.




    That is literally exactly what I was told last night regarding something else.
    Posted:
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • A.G. Pennypacker A.G. Pennypacker  489Members Posts: 489
    Joined:  #498
    \



    I'm sorry but if you are an 18 handicap you are not making consistent enough solid contact to tell a difference. I would argue that most scratch or better players scores would not change over a 10 round average between the TP5 and ProV1. The differences between all these balls is very minor but at the end of the day can lead to a 3ft par putt versus a 4ft par putt which very well could be a stroke difference in score. Again this one foot difference is assuming you strike it well, if your chip it thin or fat it won't make a difference. I think the sound and feel is what changes the most between the balls and that just comes down to a comfort level.



    Of all the premium balls I tested this year the only very obvious noticeable difference I found (other then feel or sound) was the TP5 excessive spin on full wedges. Basically all the other balls have slight differences that really are not going to make or break you over a 10 round average. The TP5 I found that I have to play a lot of dead hand/ knock down wedge shots or account for the spin.




    I'm sorry, but judging someone's ball striking ability, solely based their handicap is a ridiculous proposition. I'm a single digit right now, but it wasn't long ago I was an 18hcp, and I can tell you I was not a poor ball striker. I was not good off the tee, not good at putting, and only ok around the greens... but I was a good ball striker, certainly good enough to notice a difference between the different balls.
    Posted:
  • BigHook25BigHook25  2295Members Posts: 2,295
    Joined:  #499
    Stanks wrote:


    Well telling me I don't know something due to score level doesn't mean much in my eye. I never needed anyone's approval on here. Still don't. Maybe, I am ranked first in driving and scrambling but can't not make a 4 putt to save my life. You don't know, son. You don't.



    I see pitch mark versus where the ball stopped after in spins back. I see a ball releasing. I can feel the ball for compression and note it's respnse off certain clubs. I def don't strike center every shot. I'm sure you don't either.



    I'd still take this over any Prov1 any day.




    Agreed. More relevant would be swing speed and if your a high spin, medium spin, or low spin player.
    Posted:
  • Par5overWaterPar5overWater  110Members Posts: 110
    Joined:  #500
    Chris975d,



    So what are your top 3 tour balls in terms of performance? I am interested in trying out some golf balls this year as I am in the camp that has habitually always played a ProV1. The Bridgestone ball and TP5x are on my short list of contenders to knock out the ProV1.



    (too many quotes I couldn't figure out how to reply directly to you, hope u see this)
    Posted:
    TaylorMade 2017 M2 9.5* (Diamana BF 60TX)
    TaylorMade M515* (Diamana BF 70TX)
    TaylorMade P790 UDI 18* (Accra 100i M5)
    Titleist 712 CB 4-PW (Tour Issue X-100)
    Titleist SM5 Vokey 52*56*,60* (Tour Issue X-100)
    Odyssey Red 7s
  • oregongolforegongolf  8581Lefty Boomers Posts: 8,581
    Joined:  #501
    Stanks wrote:


    Well telling me I don't know something due to score level doesn't mean much in my eye. I never needed anyone's approval on here. Still don't. Maybe, I am ranked first in driving and scrambling but can't not make a 4 putt to save my life. You don't know, son. You don't.



    I see pitch mark versus where the ball stopped after in spins back. I see a ball releasing. I can feel the ball for compression and note it's respnse off certain clubs. I def don't strike center every shot. I'm sure you don't either.



    I'd still take this over any Prov1 any day.


    \



    I'm sorry but if you are an 18 handicap you are not making consistent enough solid contact to tell a difference. I would argue that most scratch or better players scores would not change over a 10 round average between the TP5 and ProV1. The differences between all these balls is very minor but at the end of the day can lead to a 3ft par putt versus a 4ft par putt which very well could be a stroke difference in score. Again this one foot difference is assuming you strike it well, if your chip it thin or fat it won't make a difference. I think the sound and feel is what changes the most between the balls and that just comes down to a comfort level.



    Of all the premium balls I tested this year the only very obvious noticeable difference I found (other then feel or sound) was the TP5 excessive spin on full wedges. Basically all the other balls have slight differences that really are not going to make or break you over a 10 round average. The TP5 I found that I have to play a lot of dead hand/ knock down wedge shots or account for the spin.




    I'm sorry, but judging someone's ball striking ability, solely based their handicap is a ridiculous proposition. I'm a single digit right now, but it wasn't long ago I was an 18hcp, and I can tell you I was not a poor ball striker. I was not good off the tee, not good at putting, and only ok around the greens... but I was a good ball striker, certainly good enough to notice a difference between the different balls.




    I agree to a point, but by and large, he isn't wrong. Would you listen to what a 36 handicap says about a ball? They're lucky to get it off the ground more often than not. Not saying they can't contribute at all, just that their scope might be limited to a very small part of the performance of the ball (likely putting?).



    I know there are anecdotes (like the post below yours) where someone says they drive it like a +4 but 4 putt greens or can't hit a driver, but are excellent ball strikers. Sorry, those people don't exist. 18s are 18s for a reason. They do everything measurably worse than a scratch.



    As a golf pro, I played thousands of rounds of golf, fit and taught innumerable golfers and have never seen an 18 drive it like a <5 handicap. I will say I've seen 12s drive it well, while still being very new to the game and are rapidly improving (hitting lots of balls, very little short game work--they are typically very good athletes before picking up the game too). That's still a ways off from your original point.



    Don't get me wrong, everyone has something to contribute of value. I just wish people would be far more specific in their reviews of a ball. "As an 18 handicap, I'm driving it straighter than ever before due to the less spin off the driver" etc.



    While I don't use the TP5, it's good to know there may be an issue with excessive spin for a higher swing speed/low handicap players.



    Sorry this is sort of off topic, but it is crazy how many perpetuate this myth... sort of like X celebrity/pro athlete could play on tour, etc.
    Posted:
  • mmack067mmack067 Ottawa 727Members Posts: 727
    Joined:  #502
    I'll go one step further and say that without a quality test on a LM with similar strikes then we can't really have an accurate discussion on 1-2 degrees of launch or a couple hundred RPMs. There's just no way to see that on the course with any sort of reliability.



    That said, on course testing does serve a purpose and can be very informative. I did a bunch of ball testing when the first TP5 came out and the numbers were close on the LM, but the aerodynamics of the balls in windy conditions were much different when I got them out on the course. Of course there is also green side performance that is a major consideration when selecting which ball is right for you.
    Posted:
    Ping G400 LST - Copperhead 70TX
    Titleist TS2 15* - Whiteboard 70X
    Titleist 910H 17˚ -  Project X 7.0
    Srixon Z785 4i, Miura MC-501 5-PW - X100
    Vokey SM7 50F, 54S
    TM Milled Grind 58 SB
    Scotty Cameron Studio Stainless NP2

    Twitter-icon.png  lDLcKyO.png?1  


  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • dpb5031dpb5031 Jupiter, FL 5505Members Posts: 5,505
    Joined:  #503
    There may be exceptions but most higher handicap players just aren't consistent enough to tell any significant performance difference between the different Tour-level urethane balls. Feel and durability, ok...maybe.



    My brother claims the Pro VIx is 10 yards longer off the driver for him (he's a 16 hc). I'm like, how the **** can you tell...you never hit two shots that look alike through an entire round. I just shake my head.



    Anyway, I tested the new TP5x v. last year's model on a week long/10 round trip to the DR and to me they feel and perform almost identical to one another. I do think the new one is slightly more durable and resistant to scuffing, but the dimple edges started to smooth out over 18 holes.
    Posted:
    USGA Index: ~1

    WITB:
    Ping G410 LST 9 degree - Tour AD IZ 6x
    Taylormade M2 Tour 15 Fujikura Pro TourSpec 73 
    Kasco K2K 33 - UST Axivcore 65 Tour Green 
    Callaway RazrX Tour 4h - Tour 95 shaft
    Ping i200 5-UW (2 flat) - Nippon Modus 105X
    Taylormade HiToe 54 (bent to 55 & 2 flat)
    Taylormade HiToe 64 (Bent to 62 & 2 flat)
    Palmer AP30R putter (circa 1960s)
    Taylormade TP5X Ball
  • scratchswingerscratchswinger  16312Members Posts: 16,312
    Joined:  #504
    mmack067 wrote:


    I'll go one step further and say that without a quality test on a LM with similar strikes then we can't really have an accurate discussion on 1-2 degrees of launch or a couple hundred RPMs. There's just no way to see that on the course with any sort of reliability.



    That said, on course testing does serve a purpose and can be very informative. I did a bunch of ball testing when the first TP5 came out and the numbers were close on the LM, but the aerodynamics of the balls in windy conditions were much different when I got them out on the course. Of course there is also green side performance that is a major consideration when selecting which ball is right for you.




    I agree you cannot see 1-2° launch and a few hundred RPM spin with a naked eye. The reason I don't think a LM is needed is because 1/2 launch a few hundred spin is really a non factor compared to what you actually see and feel. Don't get me a wrong if I had a Trackman I would use it but at the end of the day it's not going to tell me anything that is going to sway my decision.
    Posted:
  • scratchswingerscratchswinger  16312Members Posts: 16,312
    Joined:  #505
    oregongolf wrote:


    I agree to a point, but by and large, he isn't wrong. Would you listen to what a 36 handicap says about a ball? They're lucky to get it off the ground more often than not. Not saying they can't contribute at all, just that their scope might be limited to a very small part of the performance of the ball (likely putting?).



    I know there are anecdotes (like the post below yours) where someone says they drive it like a +4 but 4 putt greens or can't hit a driver, but are excellent ball strikers. Sorry, those people don't exist. 18s are 18s for a reason. They do everything measurably worse than a scratch.



    As a golf pro, I played thousands of rounds of golf, fit and taught innumerable golfers and have never seen an 18 drive it like a <5 handicap. I will say I've seen 12s drive it well, while still being very new to the game and are rapidly improving (hitting lots of balls, very little short game work--they are typically very good athletes before picking up the game too). That's still a ways off from your original point.



    Don't get me wrong, everyone has something to contribute of value. I just wish people would be far more specific in their reviews of a ball. "As an 18 handicap, I'm driving it straighter than ever before due to the less spin off the driver" etc.



    While I don't use the TP5, it's good to know there may be an issue with excessive spin for a higher swing speed/low handicap players.



    Sorry this is sort of off topic, but it is crazy how many perpetuate this myth... sort of like X celebrity/pro athlete could play on tour, etc.



    dpb5031 wrote:


    There may be exceptions but most higher handicap players just aren't consistent enough to tell any significant performance difference between the different Tour-level urethane balls. Feel and durability, ok...maybe.



    My brother claims the Pro VIx is 10 yards longer off the driver for him (he's a 16 hc). I'm like, how the **** can you tell...you never hit two shots that look alike through an entire round. I just shake my head.



    Anyway, I tested the new TP5x v. last year's model on a week long/10 round trip to the DR and to me they feel and perform almost identical to one another. I do think the new one is slightly more durable and resistant to scuffing, but the dimple edges started to smooth out over 18 holes.




    image/fan_1.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':fan_1:' /> image/victory.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':victory:' />
    Posted:
  • jorgegm022jorgegm022  82ClubWRX Posts: 82
    Joined:  #506
    Try the Bridgestone Tour BX
    Posted:
    Tour Edge EXS Driver 10.5* Tensei Blue 60
    Callaway XR16 3W Speeder 565
    Tour Edge CBX Iron Wood 19* KBS 90 Stiff
    Taylormade P770 4-9 KBS Tour FLT 120
    Edel Wedges 46*, 51* & 56* KBS HiRev 2.0
    Ping Anser 2 34"
    Bridgestone Tour B X
22

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file