USGA and Lucy Li (MERGED)

245

Comments

  • tiger1873tiger1873 Members Posts: 1,041 ✭✭
    edited Jan 7, 2019 7:57am #32
    ctmason_98 wrote:

    cxx wrote:


    Amateur athletics is worth preserving in all sports. If you want to make money at a sport, turn pro. Lots of people do. I for one don't want to relegate college athletics to a farm league.



    There are many sports where the lower levels of play are dominated by professionals, hockey and baseball come to mind. These teams are mostly of local interest to places without big league teams. I'd hate to see college athletics fall into irrelevancy where association with the college is tenuous at best and is more like a brand.




    1) We compensate you for representing this University by paying your significant tuition, food, housing, some clothing, athletic equipment and travel costs for competitions as well as a small stipend.



    2) We compensate you as a top golfer by paying your travel costs to come film a commercial and represent our product.



    Individual number one is an amateur who is preserving the integrity of athletics and ensuring only a true amateur who is not doing this for compensation.



    Individual number two is a professional who has no business being playing agai st other amateurs.



    Does anyone else see the absurdity in this?




    Paying an amateurs college tuition is not the same and completely different form of compensation.



    Colleges have their own tournaments you have to play and you represent them. The average amateur does not play in those events. They pretty much only get the right to attend class and the school pays for cost to compete.



    Any amateur can have a sponsor. Apple could have easily paid for flights, tournaments and even living expenses. They just could not ask for anything in return.



    Having a commercial and featuring her in it is not the same and clearly an issue for amateur status. Almost certain that she got paid somehow for it from the sound of it solely because of her ability in golf.
    Post edited by Unknown User on
  • JDee1935JDee1935 Members Posts: 15 ✭✭
    Holy Moses wrote:


    https://www.golfchan...ags=golf1305000



    "Li, a 16-year-old amateur golfer who is ranked ninth in the world, was one of the subjects for a new Apple Watch ad campaign, which includes a video of Li hitting golf shots in a number of settings wearing the company's watch. Apple released the ad last week, and the USGA is now looking into the matter and gathering more information that could determine if Li violated any terms of her amateur status."



    I detest the USGA.




    Do not blame the USGA here. Blame Li's parents and herself.



    Every elite amateur is aware of the rules. There is no way that Li gets into this commercial without an agent securing it for her, massive contract, and financial stipulations.



    Amateurs know, that any company consentually using their "likeness" for profit, will result in loss of amateur status.



    The dumb thing here, is that Li doesn't have any other fall backs than seeking exemptions, qualifiers, or playing in Asia for a year. Is not easy getting exemptions.



    It's not the USGA's fault that she did this. She wasn't on a commercial selling lemonade. Apple is enormous. She is now a professional..period.
  • BrianMcGBrianMcG Members Posts: 2,268 ✭✭
    GoGoErky wrote:


    Going to be interesting to see if they can prove she profited/benefited from this. When a popular amateur one needs to be aware of the rules when doing things with companies




    It doesn’t matter if she did or not. If Apple did, then she loses her status.



    I remember a mid am winner almost losing his status because his company documented his achievements in a recruiting brochure. He got a letter from the USGA and the company had to change their brochures.
    Walter: Tell me Bobby, why do you play this game?
    Bobby: I play because I love it.
    Walter: Well I play for the money. I have to win. That is why every time we face each other I will always beat you.
  • farmerfarmer Members Posts: 7,850 ✭✭
    It's a rule and she broke the rule. Revoking her amateur status over this commercial would be a huge overreaction by the USGA, but there will be some penalty. As an aside, college sports are a farm system for professional sports. Basketball, football, baseball, all these really good kids have been scouted for years, college provides a venue where they prove their credentials.
  • mocokidmocokid Members Posts: 1,746 ✭✭
    shackelford made some good points, USGA afraid to criticize as it will not grow the game. 2) amateur golf is almost a joke, minor league training for the Tour, nothing else. Here is the article.



    https://www.geoffshackelford.com/homepage/2019/1/6/lucy-li-the-time-has-come-to-end-amateur-status
  • BertGABertGA Members Posts: 277 ✭✭
    So are we arguing to eliminate amateur status altogether?
  • ctmason_98ctmason_98 TOTALLY outta the bag... Members Posts: 1,827 ✭✭
    tiger1873 wrote:


    Paying an amateurs college tuition is not the same and completely different form of compensation.



    Colleges have their own tournaments you have to play and you represent them. The average amateur does not play in those events. They pretty much only get the right to attend class and the school pays for cost to compete.



    Any amateur can have a sponsor. <b>Apple could have easily paid for flights, tournaments and even living expenses. They just could not ask for anything in return.</b>



    Having a commercial and featuring her in it is not the same and clearly an issue for amateur status. Almost certain that she got paid somehow for it from the sound of it solely because of her ability in golf.




    I would love to hear more about your statement there. Is there an example of that?



    For individual events, “An amateur golfer must not receive expenses, directly or indirectly, from a professional gent or any other similar source as may be determined by the Governing Body.”



    When we look to the hole of rule 4-2 it doesn’t seem so clear cut that Apple could do what you’re saying.



    And I understand the distinction you’re making with college golfers and other amateurs. I don’t agree.



    I simply think this imaginary line in the definition of “compensation” is nonsense. If you receive compensation or any financial gain “directly or indirectly” you’re not an amateur.



    Given the realities of college athletics today I think it’s dishonest to say that they’re receiving no compensation.



    And your statement that “they pretty much only get the right to attend class...” is simply incorrect. There are other forms of compensation like I mentioned.
  • ctmason_98ctmason_98 TOTALLY outta the bag... Members Posts: 1,827 ✭✭
    JDee1935 wrote:


    Amateurs know, that any company consentually using their "likeness" for profit, will result in loss of amateur status.




    Unless of course that company is the NCAA.



    Please now lecture me on how the NCAA isn’t a company and a non-profit so is not profiting off anything.
  • Krt22Krt22 Members Posts: 6,467 ✭✭
    BrianMcG wrote:


    Now she is free to make a YouTube channel of her taking a bunch of lessons from different pros.






    10 internet kudos to you, fine sir.
  • yellowlover519yellowlover519 Members Posts: 298 ✭✭
    How is this different than receiving a golf manufacturer sponsorship at a young age? Isn’t playing that particular OEM a form of advertising with all the pictures taken of elite juniors on social media or magazines?
  • geno4952geno4952 Members Posts: 120 ✭✭
    b.helts wrote:


    You're making the NCAA athlete should be paid argument. OK. I see where you're coming from.



    How/when does the USGA profit from Lucy Li?




    I could be wrong but didn't both the USGA and CBS use her likeness to promote the Drive, Pitch and Putt being held at Augusta National?? Profit to be made there as far as I can see... if she can't use her likeness then they shouldn't be able to either. Almost as bad as Tiger having to give Arnold Palmer back $25 for a dinner he bought for him.... ludicrous......
    Now Playing.... backup bag No.2

    TM R7 10.5* driver
    TM 200 series 3 wood
    Callaway Heaven Wood
    1987 Ping Eye 2 Black dot 3-PW
    Ping Eye 2 sw
    Ping Eye 2 lw
    Ping Kushin putter ...(changes often)

    Peace
  • geno4952geno4952 Members Posts: 120 ✭✭
    JDee1935 wrote:

    Holy Moses wrote:


    https://www.golfchan...ags=golf1305000



    "Li, a 16-year-old amateur golfer who is ranked ninth in the world, was one of the subjects for a new Apple Watch ad campaign, which includes a video of Li hitting golf shots in a number of settings wearing the company's watch. Apple released the ad last week, and the USGA is now looking into the matter and gathering more information that could determine if Li violated any terms of her amateur status."



    I detest the USGA.




    Do not blame the USGA here. Blame Li's parents and herself.



    Every elite amateur is aware of the rules. There is no way that Li gets into this commercial without an agent securing it for her, massive contract, and financial stipulations.



    Amateurs know, that any company consentually using their "likeness" for profit, will result in loss of amateur status.



    The dumb thing here, is that Li doesn't have any other fall backs than seeking exemptions, qualifiers, or playing in Asia for a year. Is not easy getting exemptions.



    It's not the USGA's fault that she did this. She wasn't on a commercial selling lemonade. Apple is enormous. She is now a professional..period.




    She isn't at fault here... the USGA and CBS both used her likeness to promote DP&P at Augusta National... sounds a bit hypocritical to me.....
    Now Playing.... backup bag No.2

    TM R7 10.5* driver
    TM 200 series 3 wood
    Callaway Heaven Wood
    1987 Ping Eye 2 Black dot 3-PW
    Ping Eye 2 sw
    Ping Eye 2 lw
    Ping Kushin putter ...(changes often)

    Peace
  • geno4952geno4952 Members Posts: 120 ✭✭
    b.helts wrote:


    b.helts wrote:


    You're making the NCAA athlete should be paid argument. OK. I see where you're coming from.



    How/when does the USGA profit from Lucy Li?




    They used her image and story a lot when she qualified for the US Open.



    Leads to more views, which leads to more leverage for the USGA to negotiate their TV deals for example.




    ok but when you sign up for the tournament, you agree to certain media submissions. She, her parents or guardian, more accurately, literally signed up for it. They aren't "using" her, they are making good on the agreement she willing entered.




    so if she "signs up" to play golf it is ok to use her.... and the difference between that and what she did is what??? They still used her for their gain as did Apple..
    Now Playing.... backup bag No.2

    TM R7 10.5* driver
    TM 200 series 3 wood
    Callaway Heaven Wood
    1987 Ping Eye 2 Black dot 3-PW
    Ping Eye 2 sw
    Ping Eye 2 lw
    Ping Kushin putter ...(changes often)

    Peace
  • youraway2youraway2 Just Old Sticks Members Posts: 1,402 ✭✭
    [font=comic sans ms,cursive]Ping G-400 Max, 10.5, Xtorsion[/font]
    PXG, 15-degree, ACCRA
    PXG, 19-degree hybrid, ACCRA
    Cobra DWS Utility 19-degree
    CF-16, 4-PW, UST Recoil
    0311 PXG, 5-AW, i70 Areotech Steel-fiber
    SW, 56 PXG
    Ping Nickel Anser II
  • youraway2youraway2 Just Old Sticks Members Posts: 1,402 ✭✭
    Holy Moses wrote:


    https://www.golfchan...ags=golf1305000



    "Li, a 16-year-old amateur golfer who is ranked ninth in the world, was one of the subjects for a new Apple Watch ad campaign, which includes a video of Li hitting golf shots in a number of settings wearing the company's watch. Apple released the ad last week, and the USGA is now looking into the matter and gathering more information that could determine if Li violated any terms of her amateur status."



    I detest the USGA.
    Why attack the USGA? They weren't in the commercial. Hope for the correct outcome.
    [font=comic sans ms,cursive]Ping G-400 Max, 10.5, Xtorsion[/font]
    PXG, 15-degree, ACCRA
    PXG, 19-degree hybrid, ACCRA
    Cobra DWS Utility 19-degree
    CF-16, 4-PW, UST Recoil
    0311 PXG, 5-AW, i70 Areotech Steel-fiber
    SW, 56 PXG
    Ping Nickel Anser II
  • youraway2youraway2 Just Old Sticks Members Posts: 1,402 ✭✭
    edited Jan 8, 2019 10:12am #47
    JDee1935 wrote:

    Holy Moses wrote:


    https://www.golfchan...ags=golf1305000



    "Li, a 16-year-old amateur golfer who is ranked ninth in the world, was one of the subjects for a new Apple Watch ad campaign, which includes a video of Li hitting golf shots in a number of settings wearing the company's watch. Apple released the ad last week, and the USGA is now looking into the matter and gathering more information that could determine if Li violated any terms of her amateur status."



    I detest the USGA.




    Do not blame the USGA here. Blame Li's parents and herself.



    Every elite amateur is aware of the rules. There is no way that Li gets into this commercial without an agent securing it for her, massive contract, and financial stipulations.



    Amateurs know, that any company consentually using their "likeness" for profit, will result in loss of amateur status.



    The dumb thing here, is that Li doesn't have any other fall backs than seeking exemptions, qualifiers, or playing in Asia for a year. Is not easy getting exemptions.



    It's not the USGA's fault that she did this. She wasn't on a commercial selling lemonade. Apple is enormous. She is now a professional..period.
    JDee1935 wrote:

    Holy Moses wrote:


    https://www.golfchan...ags=golf1305000



    "Li, a 16-year-old amateur golfer who is ranked ninth in the world, was one of the subjects for a new Apple Watch ad campaign, which includes a video of Li hitting golf shots in a number of settings wearing the company's watch. Apple released the ad last week, and the USGA is now looking into the matter and gathering more information that could determine if Li violated any terms of her amateur status."



    I detest the USGA.




    Do not blame the USGA here. Blame Li's parents and herself.



    Every elite amateur is aware of the rules. There is no way that Li gets into this commercial without an agent securing it for her, massive contract, and financial stipulations.



    Amateurs know, that any company consentually using their "likeness" for profit, will result in loss of amateur status.



    The dumb thing here, is that Li doesn't have any other fall backs than seeking exemptions, qualifiers, or playing in Asia for a year. Is not easy getting exemptions.



    It's not the USGA's fault that she did this. She wasn't on a commercial selling lemonade. Apple is enormous. She is now a professional..period.
    May not be a professional, but certainly not a amateur for the next two-years. Pass your PAT and take a cart attendant job and see what happens, been there.
    Post edited by Unknown User on
    [font=comic sans ms,cursive]Ping G-400 Max, 10.5, Xtorsion[/font]
    PXG, 15-degree, ACCRA
    PXG, 19-degree hybrid, ACCRA
    Cobra DWS Utility 19-degree
    CF-16, 4-PW, UST Recoil
    0311 PXG, 5-AW, i70 Areotech Steel-fiber
    SW, 56 PXG
    Ping Nickel Anser II
  • youraway2youraway2 Just Old Sticks Members Posts: 1,402 ✭✭
    GoGoErky wrote:


    Going to be interesting to see if they can prove she profited/benefited from this. When a popular amateur one needs to be aware of the rules when doing things with companies
    She doesn't have to benefit, Apple did.
    [font=comic sans ms,cursive]Ping G-400 Max, 10.5, Xtorsion[/font]
    PXG, 15-degree, ACCRA
    PXG, 19-degree hybrid, ACCRA
    Cobra DWS Utility 19-degree
    CF-16, 4-PW, UST Recoil
    0311 PXG, 5-AW, i70 Areotech Steel-fiber
    SW, 56 PXG
    Ping Nickel Anser II
  • SixcatSixcat SWVAMembers Posts: 1,441 ✭✭
    I'm a very "black and white" person and rarely (if ever) see gray area in life. With that said, here's my opinion. Everyone associated with the ad from the Li family to Apple knew it violated USGA rules. It was a calculated risk.



    If Li is punished by the USGA, she can play the "innocent victim" which will likely land her more endorsements as she builds her "brand" and turns professional. Having Apple and other endorsements as a part of her "brand" will also give her some leverage with the LPGA to allow her to seek status on Tour prior to turning 18.



    If she is not punished by the USGA, she gamed the system to begin building a "brand" two years before turning professional. Being the face of an Apple ad campaign will surely lead to dollars in the future whether she got paid by Apple or not. Given she is the face of an ad campaign featuring a product for a multi-billion dollar company, she has set herself up for future endorsements when she does turn professional.



    Either way, the Li family benefits!
  • cxxcxx Members Posts: 3,091 ✭✭
    Sixcat wrote:


    I'm a very "black and white" person and rarely (if ever) see gray area in life. With that said, here's my opinion. Everyone associated with the ad from the Li family to Apple knew it violated USGA rules. It was a calculated risk.



    If Li is punished by the USGA, she can play the "innocent victim" which will likely land her more endorsements as she builds her "brand" and turns professional. Having Apple and other endorsements as a part of her "brand" will also give her some leverage with the LPGA to allow her to seek status on Tour prior to turning 18.



    If she is not punished by the USGA, she gamed the system to begin building a "brand" two years before turning professional. Being the face of an Apple ad campaign will surely lead to dollars in the future whether she got paid by Apple or not. Given she is the face of an ad campaign featuring a product for a multi-billion dollar company, she has set herself up for future endorsements when she does turn professional.



    Either way, the Li family benefits!




    This makes the most sense in the "everybody is a brand" world that we live in. Fame and recognition are there own payment and very valuable.
  • ChipNRunChipNRun Members Posts: 1,224 ✭✭
    edited Jan 18, 2019 4:27pm #51
    I see several hot points on how things have tumbled out.



    First, Apple built ad for its Close Your Rings series which allegedly promotes youth fitness. The golf ad shows Lucy with the Apple watch in sports and social settings, but doesn’t explicitly mention the Rings fitness program. I thought including this might have given Lucy a modicum of public-service cover.



    Second, a related ad in the campaign features Olympic swimmer Haley Anderson. What action has the USOC taken, if any, on this matter? (I don’t know. A quick Google came up empty). If none, the USGA risks charges of being out-of-step with the rest of the amateur neighborhood.



    Third, how much incremental personal benefit did Lucy get from the ad? Almost nil. Lucy qualified for the US Women’s Open at age 11, played in several international events in 2018, and at age 16 is ranked in top 10 of women golf amateurs. From a business promotions standpoint, I have to take a “whatever” attitude toward the Apple ad.



    Then, USGA executive Mike Davis proclaims on gone-viral video how much Lucy has helped the game, and recalls how cute she was eating ice cream on TV at Augusta National after winning the 2014 Drive, Chip and Putt competition. So, it’s OK for Lucy to help the USGA grow the game, but it’s not OK for Lucy to promote youth fitness with a major commercial company. USGA will have fun arguing about this.



    Then there’s the fact that the USGA has white males for 14 of 17 executive committee members. Let’s see, white males jumping down hard on a 16-year-old female Chinese American – that’s bad optics for a group trying to be more inclusive and grow the game.



    USGA’s path out of the kill zone vectors on this: The rule states that amateurs receiving personal benefit may be stripped of amateur status. Short of ending Lucy’s amateur status and her childhood, the USGA could issue a warning and clarification, maybe suspend her from a couple of tournaments. Most of all, the USGA needs go into the public square and jump hard on Apple for child endangerment.



    So, maybe we’re asking the wrong question. As ForeGals’ Beth Bethel asks, Is it Lucy vs. USGA, or Apple Inc. vs. amateur golf?

    https://foregals.com...v-amateur-golf/



    (Fix typos)
    Post edited by Unknown User on
    What's In The Bag *...

    Driver: Calla XR16 Pro 10.5° (set open) / Fuji Evolution II TS Speeder 665 R-flex 63 gr.
    FWs: Tour Edge XRail 4W + 7W / GraphiteDesign G60 R-flex 60 gr.
    or Calla Alpha 815, set 16° + 20° / Fuji Motore Speeder 665 R-flex 62 gr.
    Hybrid: Cobra FlyZ 3H 19° + 4H 22° / Matrix VLCT Altus Lite flex 73 gr.
    Irons: Tour Edge CB Pro Tungsten 4i - PW** / KBS Tour 90 R-flex 101 gr. (As of 21 Nov 2018)
    Wedge: Calla MD3 48°/8.SS + 54°/12.WS +
    MD.PM 60°/10  | KBS Tour R-flex 110 gr. |
    Putter: Slotline Inertial SL-583F / 34" w. SuperStroke 2.0 MidSlim grip
    Bag: Sun Mountain Three 5 stand bag
    Ball: Calla SuperSoft
    * Either 7W or 3H left out, depending on course.
    ** Wedges: 46°and 48°are competing for bag space.
  • BrianMcGBrianMcG Members Posts: 2,268 ✭✭
    Pro swimmers can compete in the olympics.
    Walter: Tell me Bobby, why do you play this game?
    Bobby: I play because I love it.
    Walter: Well I play for the money. I have to win. That is why every time we face each other I will always beat you.
  • LeoLeo99LeoLeo99 Members Posts: 3,983 ✭✭
    BrianMcG wrote:


    Pro swimmers can compete in the olympics.




    So can pro golfers.
  • J13J13 Dad golf Members Posts: 15,365 ✭✭
    USGA just needs to go away and the R&A needs to be the one true governing body.
    Driver - TBD
    Nike VR Pro LTD 15* / Aldila RIP 80X
    Srixon 745's 4-PW / Modus Tour 120 TX
    Callaway MD3 50, 54, 60 / Modus 125
    Odyssey White Hot Versa #6 Tour issue
    Srixon Zstar XV


    GolfWRX WITB Podcast - Irons reveal 11/14/18 http://www.golfwrx.c...utm_content=sub

    GolfWrx WITB Podcast 2017 : http://www.golfwrx.com/482668/tgtg-golfwrx-forum-member-j13-talks-witb-and-club-testing/

    WITB- http://www.golfwrx.c.../page__st__1590

    INSTAGRAM- @Jminis13
  • ChipNRunChipNRun Members Posts: 1,224 ✭✭
    edited Feb 7, 2019 12:49am #55
    Anything new actions in the LL saga? News stories after than Jan. 10 are mainly rehashes or social commentary on the issue.
    What's In The Bag *...

    Driver: Calla XR16 Pro 10.5° (set open) / Fuji Evolution II TS Speeder 665 R-flex 63 gr.
    FWs: Tour Edge XRail 4W + 7W / GraphiteDesign G60 R-flex 60 gr.
    or Calla Alpha 815, set 16° + 20° / Fuji Motore Speeder 665 R-flex 62 gr.
    Hybrid: Cobra FlyZ 3H 19° + 4H 22° / Matrix VLCT Altus Lite flex 73 gr.
    Irons: Tour Edge CB Pro Tungsten 4i - PW** / KBS Tour 90 R-flex 101 gr. (As of 21 Nov 2018)
    Wedge: Calla MD3 48°/8.SS + 54°/12.WS +
    MD.PM 60°/10  | KBS Tour R-flex 110 gr. |
    Putter: Slotline Inertial SL-583F / 34" w. SuperStroke 2.0 MidSlim grip
    Bag: Sun Mountain Three 5 stand bag
    Ball: Calla SuperSoft
    * Either 7W or 3H left out, depending on course.
    ** Wedges: 46°and 48°are competing for bag space.
  • leezer99leezer99 I swear I am quitting this site every day... Members Posts: 1,031 ✭✭

    There's definitely something more important that I should be doing.

  • wlmwlm Members Posts: 94 ✭✭
    Glad the USGA made the right call here.
  • SixcatSixcat SWVAMembers Posts: 1,441 ✭✭
    Not sure I agree it was the right call but not sure the USGA had any other alternative. Either way, the Li family greatly benefit. They couldn't have bought this kind of publicity on Madison Avenue.
  • buckeyeflbuckeyefl Members Posts: 5,448 ✭✭
    wlm wrote:


    Glad the USGA made the right call here.




    Except it's not the right call. Just more USGA ineptitude.
  • g-offg-off Members Posts: 336 ✭✭
    buckeyefl wrote:

    wlm wrote:


    Glad the USGA made the right call here.




    Except it's not the right call. Just more USGA ineptitude.




    this^^^^^^^
    epic flash driver

    steelhead xr heavenwood

    steelhead xr 9 wood

    edel sls 01 5,7,9,gap

    hogan tk 58

    putter rotates daily

    always hoing the next best thing
  • BrianMcGBrianMcG Members Posts: 2,268 ✭✭
    Sounds more like, "We really don't want to deal with this for the next two years" decision.
    Walter: Tell me Bobby, why do you play this game?
    Bobby: I play because I love it.
    Walter: Well I play for the money. I have to win. That is why every time we face each other I will always beat you.
Sign In or Register to comment.