Jump to content

What’s with Crossfield and “strokes gained” subject lately?


BB28403

Recommended Posts

Crossfield is stuck on Mark Brodie’s Strokes gained App at the moment.

It is kind of annoying him just throwing out these stats constantly.

He does not focus on how one could improve or actually fixing a problem. He just throws out stats.

I miss his Journey stuff with the amateurs .

It’s still good entertainment, just c’mon mark, get off the strokes gained stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might be getting paid to honk on the app a little? At least he mixes it up with a few digs at Ray and Coach.

Titleist Tsi3 9/Tensei White 65x

Titleist Tsi2 16.5/Tensei White 75x

Titleist 818 h2 21/Tensei White 95x

Mizuno Mp-20 mb 4-Pw/Dynamic Gold 120x

Mizuno T22 50, 54, 58/Dynamic Gold s400

Bettinardi Studio Stock #8

Titleist ProV1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @MountainGoat said:

> What's he saying?

>

 

If you check out his latest videos on YouTube then you can see he has downloaded the app for mark broadies strokes gained , “Every shot counts “, and he keeps on and on and on about it. He’s been analyzing all his playing partners golf games with it and then telling them to their face that they need to do better. He’s like a dog with a bone. It’s pretty annoying to watch.

Some people do not live and die by Mark Brodie’s stuff, I don’t think analyzing the pros stats tells amateurs much .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Brodie's work doesn't translate to telling the average amateur how to improve. The message I have gotten from the Crossfield videos is that it's better to bomb your driver 300 yards than lay back with a 220-yard shot with your 3 iron. That is, there are more strokes gained with the 300-yard drive as opposed to the 220-yard iron tee shot. HOWEVER, if you're the average amateur and cannot hit a driver 300 yards, then what does Brodie's work tell you. Just hit the ball as far as you can?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @DrDon said:

> I agree that Brodie's work doesn't translate to telling the average amateur how to improve. The message I have gotten from the Crossfield videos is that it's better to bomb your driver 300 yards than lay back with a 220-yard shot with your 3 iron. That is, there are more strokes gained with the 300-yard drive as opposed to the 220-yard iron tee shot. HOWEVER, if you're the average amateur and cannot hit a driver 300 yards, then what does Brodie's work tell you. Just hit the ball as far as you can?

 

Yes more or less. If it is unlikely that hitting the maximum distance you can off the tee will put you in penalty areas or overly penal rough then longer is better. It is easier to hit the ball closer to the hole from light rough than fairway if you are 20 - 30 yards closer.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @ThinkingPlus said:

> > @DrDon said:

> > I agree that Brodie's work doesn't translate to telling the average amateur how to improve. The message I have gotten from the Crossfield videos is that it's better to bomb your driver 300 yards than lay back with a 220-yard shot with your 3 iron. That is, there are more strokes gained with the 300-yard drive as opposed to the 220-yard iron tee shot. HOWEVER, if you're the average amateur and cannot hit a driver 300 yards, then what does Brodie's work tell you. Just hit the ball as far as you can?

>

> Yes more or less. If it is unlikely that hitting the maximum distance you can off the tee will put you in penalty areas or overly penal rough then longer is better. It is easier to hit the ball closer to the hole from light rough than fairway if you are 20 - 30 yards closer.

 

What if you are in another fairway or a bunker or behind a grove of trees or in a lake . I think those are the times not to go gunning for 20 extra yards to hit a 7 iron in versus a hybrid.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @BB28403 said:

> > @ThinkingPlus said:

> > > @DrDon said:

> > > I agree that Brodie's work doesn't translate to telling the average amateur how to improve. The message I have gotten from the Crossfield videos is that it's better to bomb your driver 300 yards than lay back with a 220-yard shot with your 3 iron. That is, there are more strokes gained with the 300-yard drive as opposed to the 220-yard iron tee shot. HOWEVER, if you're the average amateur and cannot hit a driver 300 yards, then what does Brodie's work tell you. Just hit the ball as far as you can?

> >

> > Yes more or less. If it is unlikely that hitting the maximum distance you can off the tee will put you in penalty areas or overly penal rough then longer is better. It is easier to hit the ball closer to the hole from light rough than fairway if you are 20 - 30 yards closer.

>

> What if you are in another fairway or a bunker or behind a grove of trees or in a lake . I think those are the times not to go gunning for 20 extra yards to hit a 7 iron in versus a hybrid.

 

I think a lake qualifies as a penalty area. Fairway bunkers (for most) = penal rough = behind trees. Any situation which would add an effective penalty stroke should be avoided. An adjacent fairway is fine as long as you have a clear shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brodie's work is a direct refutation of the long-held belief promoted by Dave Pelz and others that there are certain magic "full swing" distances from which you should play in order to get the ball closest to the hole. This applies mostly to par-5s but can also be applied to shorter holes, as well. Brodie's calculations indicate that there are no magic distances that promote maximum accuracy. Just get the ball as close as you can with every swing and then get it closer. Brodie also refutes the common belief that, since most of your shots are putts, you ought to spend most of your time working on your putting.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, people think yeah they're not going to hit 3 wood in to the woods instead hit a 7 iron in the fairway. Be honest with yourself, if your 3 wood swing is that inconsistent your 7 iron swing isn't amazing either. What's to stop a player from slicing his 7 iron or duffing it 5 yards? At least a duff with a 3 wood would go further forward. And if you didn't like his delivery in the past, you won't like it any more now. It's just his latest subject he is talking about. Probably struggling a little to find new ingenious topics to talk about so just slowing his roll.

Callaway Paradym TD 10* Ventus Red TR 5S

Titleist TSR3 13.5* 3 Wood Tour AD-IZ 6S

Titleist TSR3 19* hybrid Modus GOST S

Titleist TSR2 24* hybrid Modus GOST S

Callaway Paradym Hybrid 27* Ventus non Velocore S

Titleist T100 2023 6-PW KBS Tour V S

Titleist SM8 50, 56, 60

Scotty Cameron X7.5 CS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @BB28403 said:

> > @ThinkingPlus said:

> > > @DrDon said:

> > > I agree that Brodie's work doesn't translate to telling the average amateur how to improve. The message I have gotten from the Crossfield videos is that it's better to bomb your driver 300 yards than lay back with a 220-yard shot with your 3 iron. That is, there are more strokes gained with the 300-yard drive as opposed to the 220-yard iron tee shot. HOWEVER, if you're the average amateur and cannot hit a driver 300 yards, then what does Brodie's work tell you. Just hit the ball as far as you can?

> >

> > Yes more or less. If it is unlikely that hitting the maximum distance you can off the tee will put you in penalty areas or overly penal rough then longer is better. It is easier to hit the ball closer to the hole from light rough than fairway if you are 20 - 30 yards closer.

>

> What if you are in another fairway or a bunker or behind a grove of trees or in a lake . I think those are the times not to go gunning for 20 extra yards to hit a 7 iron in versus a hybrid.

 

You have to consider the upside too. By hitting a hybrid or 7 iron on a par four you are basically eliminating birdie from your possible set of scores, as well as making par a real challenge unless it is a super short hole. If your goal is to break 80, making a couple birdies and a handful of two putt pars makes your life a whole lot easier than trying to get up and down for par all day.

 

Every situation is different, and there are times where hitting driver doesn't make sense at all, but for the most part the extra 50-60 yards compared to a hybrid or iron off the tee is worth the risk of the occasional blow up.

 

Most doubles + are not caused by errant drives, but overly aggressive recovery shots that go wrong. A long drive into the trees followed by a pitch out won't be too much worse than laying way back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @gentles said:

> > @BB28403 said:

> > > @ThinkingPlus said:

> > > > @DrDon said:

> > > > I agree that Brodie's work doesn't translate to telling the average amateur how to improve. The message I have gotten from the Crossfield videos is that it's better to bomb your driver 300 yards than lay back with a 220-yard shot with your 3 iron. That is, there are more strokes gained with the 300-yard drive as opposed to the 220-yard iron tee shot. HOWEVER, if you're the average amateur and cannot hit a driver 300 yards, then what does Brodie's work tell you. Just hit the ball as far as you can?

> > >

> > > Yes more or less. If it is unlikely that hitting the maximum distance you can off the tee will put you in penalty areas or overly penal rough then longer is better. It is easier to hit the ball closer to the hole from light rough than fairway if you are 20 - 30 yards closer.

> >

> > What if you are in another fairway or a bunker or behind a grove of trees or in a lake . I think those are the times not to go gunning for 20 extra yards to hit a 7 iron in versus a hybrid.

>

> You have to consider the upside too. By hitting a hybrid or 7 iron on a par four you are basically eliminating birdie from your possible set of scores, as well as making par a real challenge unless it is a super short hole. If your goal is to break 80, making a couple birdies and a handful of two putt pars makes your life a whole lot easier than trying to get up and down for par all day.

>

> Every situation is different, and there are times where hitting driver doesn't make sense at all, but for the most part the extra 50-60 yards compared to a hybrid or iron off the tee is worth the risk of the occasional blow up.

>

> Most doubles + are not caused by errant drives, but overly aggressive recovery shots that go wrong. A long drive into the trees followed by a pitch out won't be too much worse than laying way back.

 

Yep. And this goes against all the conventional wisdom most of us have been told since we were kids. You don't always need to grab the driver. Well if you're a handicap player, yes, in most cases, just grab the driver.

 

This sort of reminds me of basketball announcers saying you don't need the three. My rule of thumb is that when they say that, you probably need a three, lol.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watch all of them and it has made me look at my strategies and I am implementing some changes. I used to lay back to hit my yardages but now I am working hard on my shorter "bad yardages" and hitting more club off the tee. Won't know the impacts for a while but I am a pretty vanilla player and I think this will give me more real looks at birdies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only problem I have with it is that people might start realizing strokes gained matters and will take away the slight advantage I have. It's kind of crazy to me that not everyone is a believer in SG. The stats don't lie. Any golfer, on average, is going to hit it closer from the rough at 120 yards than the fairway at 160 yards. You ask non-SG people what the most important part of the game is, and 50% will say putting, 50% will say short game. It's pretty clear and evident this is not the case. If you haven't read Broadie's book, I would highly suggest it. I may be in the minority (and I haven't seen all of Crossfield's videos on SG), but I enjoy hearing as much as possible about it. Maybe it's because I'm just a numbers geek, but I'm a big believer in SGs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James Sieckmann has a great story in his book about Charley Hoffman - CH was a believer in laying up to a comfy yardage, and said that he "sucked" from inside 60 yards. His proximity to the hole from 90-110 was in the top ten on tour at the time, while from 50-60 he was ~100th. The kicker was that being 100th from 50-60 was still closer than being top ten from 90-110. Even if you feel comfortable at a longer yardage, chances are your absolute proximity will be much lower from 40-50. No need to lay back, almost always better off getting as close to the green as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @gentles said:

> James Sieckmann has a great story in his book about Charley Hoffman - CH was a believer in laying up to a comfy yardage, and said that he "sucked" from inside 60 yards. His proximity to the hole from 90-110 was in the top ten on tour at the time, while from 50-60 he was ~100th. The kicker was that being 100th from 50-60 was still closer than being top ten from 90-110. Even if you feel comfortable at a longer yardage, chances are your absolute proximity will be much lower from 40-50. No need to lay back, almost always better off getting as close to the green as possible.

 

Doesnt all of the pga tour statistics typically support this notion as well? The closer they are, the smaller the proximity to the hole?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @Krt22 said:

> > @gentles said:

> > James Sieckmann has a great story in his book about Charley Hoffman - CH was a believer in laying up to a comfy yardage, and said that he "sucked" from inside 60 yards. His proximity to the hole from 90-110 was in the top ten on tour at the time, while from 50-60 he was ~100th. The kicker was that being 100th from 50-60 was still closer than being top ten from 90-110. Even if you feel comfortable at a longer yardage, chances are your absolute proximity will be much lower from 40-50. No need to lay back, almost always better off getting as close to the green as possible.

>

> Doesnt all of the pga tour statistics typically support this notion as well? The closer they are, the smaller the proximity to the hole?

 

I think I read somewhere broadie is the one who came up with the shot link system. So they may be one in the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @iHititStraightSometimes said:

> The only problem I have with it is that people might start realizing strokes gained matters and will take away the slight advantage I have. It's kind of crazy to me that not everyone is a believer in SG. The stats don't lie. Any golfer, on average, is going to hit it closer from the rough at 120 yards than the fairway at 160 yards. You ask non-SG people what the most important part of the game is, and 50% will say putting, 50% will say short game. It's pretty clear and evident this is not the case. If you haven't read Broadie's book, I would highly suggest it. I may be in the minority (and I haven't seen all of Crossfield's videos on SG), but I enjoy hearing as much as possible about it. Maybe it's because I'm just a numbers geek, but I'm a big believer in SGs.

 

 

I think it just applies to pros. It’s like they are using this system to argue over a 1/32nd size slice of cake. When amateurs have a million different ways to improve. While the pros only have that small sliver of cake between their winning and their losing, and Strokes Gained was created based on their (the pros) data.

So I feel it does not apply to amateurs who can shave 10 strokes off their game by improving , instead of chasing the “numbers”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @BB28403 said:

> > @iHititStraightSometimes said:

> > The only problem I have with it is that people might start realizing strokes gained matters and will take away the slight advantage I have. It's kind of crazy to me that not everyone is a believer in SG. The stats don't lie. Any golfer, on average, is going to hit it closer from the rough at 120 yards than the fairway at 160 yards. You ask non-SG people what the most important part of the game is, and 50% will say putting, 50% will say short game. It's pretty clear and evident this is not the case. If you haven't read Broadie's book, I would highly suggest it. I may be in the minority (and I haven't seen all of Crossfield's videos on SG), but I enjoy hearing as much as possible about it. Maybe it's because I'm just a numbers geek, but I'm a big believer in SGs.

>

>

> I think it just applies to pros. It’s like they are using this system to argue over a 1/32nd size slice of cake. When amateurs have a million different ways to improve. While the pros only have that small sliver of cake between their winning and their losing, and Strokes Gained was created based on their (the pros) data.

> So I feel it does not apply to amateurs who can shave 10 strokes off their game by improving , instead of chasing the “numbers”

 

Perhaps you should read the actual book? I have it on order, I'm not going to argue against it without reading it first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @Krt22 said:

> > @BB28403 said:

> > > @iHititStraightSometimes said:

> > > The only problem I have with it is that people might start realizing strokes gained matters and will take away the slight advantage I have. It's kind of crazy to me that not everyone is a believer in SG. The stats don't lie. Any golfer, on average, is going to hit it closer from the rough at 120 yards than the fairway at 160 yards. You ask non-SG people what the most important part of the game is, and 50% will say putting, 50% will say short game. It's pretty clear and evident this is not the case. If you haven't read Broadie's book, I would highly suggest it. I may be in the minority (and I haven't seen all of Crossfield's videos on SG), but I enjoy hearing as much as possible about it. Maybe it's because I'm just a numbers geek, but I'm a big believer in SGs.

> >

> >

> > I think it just applies to pros. It’s like they are using this system to argue over a 1/32nd size slice of cake. When amateurs have a million different ways to improve. While the pros only have that small sliver of cake between their winning and their losing, and Strokes Gained was created based on their (the pros) data.

> > So I feel it does not apply to amateurs who can shave 10 strokes off their game by improving , instead of chasing the “numbers”

>

> Perhaps you should read the actual book? I have it on order, I'm not going to argue against it without reading it first.

 

I own it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @BB28403 said:

> > @iHititStraightSometimes said:

> > The only problem I have with it is that people might start realizing strokes gained matters and will take away the slight advantage I have. It's kind of crazy to me that not everyone is a believer in SG. The stats don't lie. Any golfer, on average, is going to hit it closer from the rough at 120 yards than the fairway at 160 yards. You ask non-SG people what the most important part of the game is, and 50% will say putting, 50% will say short game. It's pretty clear and evident this is not the case. If you haven't read Broadie's book, I would highly suggest it. I may be in the minority (and I haven't seen all of Crossfield's videos on SG), but I enjoy hearing as much as possible about it. Maybe it's because I'm just a numbers geek, but I'm a big believer in SGs.

>

>

> I think it just applies to pros. It’s like they are using this system to argue over a 1/32nd size slice of cake. When amateurs have a million different ways to improve. While the pros only have that small sliver of cake between their winning and their losing, and Strokes Gained was created based on their (the pros) data.

> So I feel it does not apply to amateurs who can shave 10 strokes off their game by improving , instead of chasing the “numbers”

 

Understanding strokes gained can help you make better decisions on the golf course, which can improve your score with zero range balls or effort. If anything, average players can benefit the most from this as it doesn't require hours and hours of practice to keep and maintain changes.

 

A few examples:

 

* Knowing how to aim on holes with OB to give yourself as close to 0% chance of going OB, even if it means being in the rough 100% of the time.

* Knowing the "cost" of laying up off the tee, and deciding if giving up 50 yards is worth being in the fairway more often

* knowing where to aim your approach shots to avoid short siding yourself

* managing your expectations about what a good shot from certain distances is (i.e. not firing at every flag because you think you have to)

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Understanding Strokes Gained mostly helps with prioritizing what to work on and understanding how strong or weak you are in certain areas of the game and what to work on from there.

 

I actually counted this...the first 7 Tour players that I worked with all came to me with a similar statement that they wanted to be the best wedge player in the game. My normal response is that there are more strokes to be gained elsewhere. But, I also looked at their wedge game and a few of them were some of the premier wedge players in the game and one of them was a top-3 wedge player over the previous 5 years and didn't know it. He thought he was middle of the pack.

 

As far as making decisions using solely strokes gained...I think it gives you the basic understanding that being closer to the hole is generally better most of the time. The issue for amateurs on say a par-5 is that they may be miserable 3-wood players. But, if they can improve their 3-wood play and start hitting it closer to the hole instead of laying up to a 'money yardage', they'll start playing par-5's better (assuming the rest of their game continues to be at the same rate). I had one Tour player that outside of their putting and short game (he knew he needed to work on it without my consultation), I showed how his laying up on par-5's was killing his par-5 scores. The next season he performed roughly the same with his putting and short game around the green (which wasn't good), was slightly worse with his ballstriking (which was very good) and by simply going for more Par-5's in two or hitting the 3-wood and trying to get it up as close to the green as he could...he had his best year ever on the par-5's, his best year on Tour and got his only Tour victory.

 

For more of an approach in terms of strategy and targets, I would take a look at Scott Fawcett's work or what I wrote about in _2018 Pro Golf Synopsis_. Scott's work does have some strokes gained principles tethered to it, but it's more about understanding shot patterns and probabilities. For example...why firing at the Sunday Flag on #12 at Augusta is a bad idea. The observations of shot dispersion shows that if that flag is your target...hitting the GIR becomes equal parts luck as it does skill as a Tour player could flush one at the flag and still end up in the water due to the wind or maybe catching a little more spin or lower launch angle, etc. than needed for the shot.

 

 

 

 

RH

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #3
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Matt (LFG) Every - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Sahith Theegala - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Cameron putters (and new "LD" grip) - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Bettinardi MB & CB irons - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Bettinardi API putter cover - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Swag API covers - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Golf Pride Reverse Taper grips - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 15 replies
    • 2024 Cognizant Classic - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #1
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #2
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #3
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #4
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Brandt Snedeker - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Max Greyserman - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Eric Cole - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Carl Yuan - WITb - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Russell Henley - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Justin Sun - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alex Noren - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Shane Lowry - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Taylor Montgomery - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jake Knapp (KnappTime_ltd) - WITB - - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Super Stoke Pistol Lock 1.0 & 2.0 grips - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      LA Golf new insert putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Garsen Quad Tour 15 grip - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Swag covers - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jacob Bridgeman's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Bud Cauley's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Ryo Hisatsune's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Chris Kirk - new black Callaway Apex CB irons and a few Odyssey putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alejandro Tosti's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 2 replies
    • 2024 Genesis Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #3
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #4
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Rory McIlroy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Sepp Straka - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Patrick Rodgers - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Brendon Todd - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Denny McCarthy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Corey Conners - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Chase Johnson - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tommy Fleetwood - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Matt Fitzpatrick - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Si Woo Kim - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Viktor Hovland - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Wyndham Clark - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Cam Davis - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Nick Taylor - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Ben Baller WITB update (New putter, driver, hybrid and shafts) – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Vortex Golf rangefinder - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Fujikura Ventus shaft - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods & TaylorMade "Sun Day Red" apparel launch event, product photos – 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods Sun Day Red golf shoes - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Aretera shafts - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Toulon putters - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods' new white "Sun Day Red" golf shoe prototypes – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      • 22 replies
    • 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put and questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open - Monday #1
      2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open - Monday #2
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Ben Taylor - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Garrick Higgo - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Billy Horschel - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Justin Lower - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Lanto Griffin - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Bud Cauley - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Corbin Burnes (2021 NL Cy Young) - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Greyson Sigg - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Charley Hoffman - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Nico Echavarria - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Victor Perez - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Sami Valimaki - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Ryo Hisatsune - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      Jake Knapp's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      New Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Tyler Duncan's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Greyson Sigg's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Sunjae Im's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Ping's Waste Management putter covers - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Vincent Whaley's custom Cameron - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Odyssey Waste Management putter covers - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Super Stroke custom grips - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Zac Blair's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Bettinardi Waste Management putter covers - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
       
       
       
       
       
       

       
      • 12 replies
    • 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put and questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am - Tuesday #1
       
       
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Justin Thomas - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Nick Hardy - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Seamus Power - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Adam Hadwin - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Kurt Kitayama - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Byeong Hun An - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Nicolai Hojgaard - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Sam Burns - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Brandon Wu - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      JT Poston - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Nick Dunlap - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Alex Smalley - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Pau Gasol WITB (2x NBA Champion, 6x All-Star) – 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Josh Allen WITB (NFL Quarterback, Buffalo Bills) – 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Matt Kuchar - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      JJ Spaun - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Jordan Spieth - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Adam Svensson - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Adam Scott (mini) - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Taylor Moore - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      Ping putters - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      TaylorMade putters - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Pebble Beach Golf Links (holes 7 & 8) – 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Odyssey putters - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Lucas Glover going to test black Srixon ZX5 & ZX7 irons - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Justin Thomas wrist training aid - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Stephen Sweeney's Putting Ballistic putting training aid - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Chris Kirk club changes - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
       
       
       
       
       
      • 2 replies

×
×
  • Create New...