Jump to content

Ball in a drain: free drop, unplayable, or something else?


Recommended Posts

In a recent round, a playing partner's ball rolled via a concrete drainage ditch into a covered drainage hole. I think I am right in saying that if the ball was lying near the cover so as to affect his stance he would be provided free relief (right?), but what about when the ball is actually in the hole? Incidentally, the ball itself was pretty much irretrievable, though if we had a short net we would have been OK. Unplayable? Declare a lost ball? What would be the correct procedure in this case?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

> @No_Catchy_Nickname said:

> In a recent round, a playing partner's ball rolled via a concrete drainage ditch into a covered drainage hole. I think I am right in saying that if the ball was lying near the cover so as to affect his stance he would be provided free relief (right?), but what about when the ball is actually in the hole? Incidentally, the ball itself was pretty much irretrievable, though if we had a short net we would have been OK. Unplayable? Declare a lost ball? What would be the correct procedure in this case?

 

Yes, free relief is available for interference from an immovable obstruction (covered drainage hole) - assuming it is not inside a Penalty Area. If the ball is found in the drainage hole, and the hole is in the General Area, R16.1b applies, free relief using the Relief Area described in that rule. If the ball is lost in the drainage hole (knowledge or virtual certainty) then free relief is available under R16.1e. The key difference is the relief areas are defined slightly differently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @antip said:

> > @No_Catchy_Nickname said:

> > In a recent round, a playing partner's ball rolled via a concrete drainage ditch into a covered drainage hole. I think I am right in saying that if the ball was lying near the cover so as to affect his stance he would be provided free relief (right?), but what about when the ball is actually in the hole? Incidentally, the ball itself was pretty much irretrievable, though if we had a short net we would have been OK. Unplayable? Declare a lost ball? What would be the correct procedure in this case?

>

> Yes, free relief is available for interference from an immovable obstruction (covered drainage hole) - assuming it is not inside a Penalty Area. If the ball is found in the drainage hole, and the hole is in the General Area, R16.1b applies, free relief using the Relief Area described in that rule. If the ball is lost in the drainage hole (knowledge or virtual certainty) then free relief is available under R16.1e. The key difference is the relief areas are defined slightly differently.

 

Perhaps we don't have a clear picture of the situation. I'll point out that a Penalty Area includes surface drainage ditches even if not containing water. This sounds like one to me, and if it is no free relief from an immovable obstruction is afforded. Is the "covered drainage hole" within the ditch?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It certainly reads like it is a penalty area, formerly a water hazard. It doesn’t have to be marked to be a penalty area. From the definition:

 

“Any body of water on the course (whether or not marked by the Committee), including a sea, lake, pond, river, ditch, surface drainage ditch or other open watercourse (even if not containing water),”

 

The OP uses “drainage ditch” and “drainage hole” in his post. This is very likely a penalty area. No free relief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm. The covered drainage hole was not marked as a penalty area, it was in the General Area. Also, the cover was a lattice grate, so the ball was visible, if that makes a difference. At this course, if the ball goes such a ditch (more like gutters than ditches, if it helps. Made of concrete) free relief is allowed, which is why I thought it would also be allowed from the drainage hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, thank you for the answers. I will check with the course the next time I go. Most of these concrete gutters run along the cart paths, and are treated as part of the cart path. This particular one, however, actually ran away the cart path at 90 degrees, and ended in the drainage hole a few yards away from the cart path.

Playing as a junior in the UK, I remember drainage ditches were usually treated as lateral water hazards, but they were staked red. The drainage hole at this course had no marking, so my guess was free relief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @No_Catchy_Nickname said:

> Playing as a junior in the UK, I remember drainage ditches were usually treated as lateral water hazards, but they were staked red. The drainage hole at this course had no marking, so my guess was free relief.

 

The significant words in the definition in that case are "surface drainage ditch or other **open watercourse** (even if not containing water),...."

Is the 'drainage run' an open concrete channel along the ground, leading to the vertical(?) hole with the lattice cover?

Unless it has been 'tied' to the associated path by a Local Rule (as I guess are the other drains), it should be treated as a Penalty Area and I would suggest so should the drain hole at the end.

But IMO the course should really tie it to the path as one Immovable Obstruction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @Newby said:

> > @No_Catchy_Nickname said:

> > Playing as a junior in the UK, I remember drainage ditches were usually treated as lateral water hazards, but they were staked red. The drainage hole at this course had no marking, so my guess was free relief.

>

> The significant words in the definition in that case are "surface drainage ditch or other **open watercourse** (even if not containing water),...."

> Is the 'drainage run' an open concrete channel along the ground, leading to the vertical(?) hole with the lattice cover?

> Unless it has been 'tied' to the associated path by a Local Rule (as I guess are the other drains), it should be treated as a Penalty Area and I would suggest so should the drain hole at the end.

> But IMO the course should really tie it to the path as one Immovable Obstruction.

 

The drainage run was indeed an open concrete channel along the ground, connecting to the vertical hole with the lattice cover.

So without a local rule, it would be treated as a penalty area?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @No_Catchy_Nickname said:

> > @Newby said:

> > > @No_Catchy_Nickname said:

> > > Playing as a junior in the UK, I remember drainage ditches were usually treated as lateral water hazards, but they were staked red. The drainage hole at this course had no marking, so my guess was free relief.

> >

> > The significant words in the definition in that case are "surface drainage ditch or other **open watercourse** (even if not containing water),...."

> > Is the 'drainage run' an open concrete channel along the ground, leading to the vertical(?) hole with the lattice cover?

> > Unless it has been 'tied' to the associated path by a Local Rule (as I guess are the other drains), it should be treated as a Penalty Area and I would suggest so should the drain hole at the end.

> > But IMO the course should really tie it to the path as one Immovable Obstruction.

>

> The drainage run was indeed an open concrete channel along the ground, connecting to the vertical hole with the lattice cover.

> So without a local rule, it would be treated as a penalty area?

 

IMO it would be treated as a penalty area with our without a local rule. (I doubt that it would be permissible to have a course feature which is a penalty area by definition turned into a segment of general area by local rule -- but these issues are dealt with case by case so, who knows!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @No_Catchy_Nickname said:

> > @Newby said:

> > > @No_Catchy_Nickname said:

> > > Playing as a junior in the UK, I remember drainage ditches were usually treated as lateral water hazards, but they were staked red. The drainage hole at this course had no marking, so my guess was free relief.

> >

> > The significant words in the definition in that case are "surface drainage ditch or other **open watercourse** (even if not containing water),...."

> > Is the 'drainage run' an open concrete channel along the ground, leading to the vertical(?) hole with the lattice cover?

> > Unless it has been 'tied' to the associated path by a Local Rule (as I guess are the other drains), it should be treated as a Penalty Area and I would suggest so should the drain hole at the end.

> > But IMO the course should really tie it to the path as one Immovable Obstruction.

>

> The drainage run was indeed an open concrete channel along the ground, connecting to the vertical hole with the lattice cover.

> So without a local rule, it would be treated as a penalty area?

 

In my part of the world, most concrete drains on the course are Immovable Obstructions, not penalty areas. And even concrete water channels that run directly across fairways can be treated as IOs in situations where they are only there to channel irregular rainfall - that is, they are not 'normally' channeling water - so it is a Committee discretion in such circumstances. This interpretation has previously been tested with the Ruling Bodies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @antip said:

> > @No_Catchy_Nickname said:

> > > @Newby said:

> > > > @No_Catchy_Nickname said:

> > > > Playing as a junior in the UK, I remember drainage ditches were usually treated as lateral water hazards, but they were staked red. The drainage hole at this course had no marking, so my guess was free relief.

> > >

> > > The significant words in the definition in that case are "surface drainage ditch or other **open watercourse** (even if not containing water),...."

> > > Is the 'drainage run' an open concrete channel along the ground, leading to the vertical(?) hole with the lattice cover?

> > > Unless it has been 'tied' to the associated path by a Local Rule (as I guess are the other drains), it should be treated as a Penalty Area and I would suggest so should the drain hole at the end.

> > > But IMO the course should really tie it to the path as one Immovable Obstruction.

> >

> > The drainage run was indeed an open concrete channel along the ground, connecting to the vertical hole with the lattice cover.

> > So without a local rule, it would be treated as a penalty area?

>

> In my part of the world, most concrete drains on the course are Immovable Obstructions, not penalty areas. And even concrete water channels that run directly across fairways can be treated as IOs in situations where they are only there to channel irregular rainfall - that is, they are not 'normally' channeling water - so it is a Committee discretion in such circumstances. This interpretation has previously been tested with the Ruling Bodies.

 

I would thought so too. In the old days also French drains gave you free relief. Soon someone will say a grate on top of well is penalty area...

Ping G15 Titleist 950R Titleist 910D2 Titleist TS2
Titleist 910f 3W
Callaway XHot hybrid
Titleist 735cm Titleist AP2
Vokey wedges
Tri-Ball SRT Odyssey Works Versa #1 Tank Scotty Cameron Futura 5W

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @QEight said:

> > @antip said:

> > > @No_Catchy_Nickname said:

> > > > @Newby said:

> > > > > @No_Catchy_Nickname said:

> > > > > Playing as a junior in the UK, I remember drainage ditches were usually treated as lateral water hazards, but they were staked red. The drainage hole at this course had no marking, so my guess was free relief.

> > > >

> > > > The significant words in the definition in that case are "surface drainage ditch or other **open watercourse** (even if not containing water),...."

> > > > Is the 'drainage run' an open concrete channel along the ground, leading to the vertical(?) hole with the lattice cover?

> > > > Unless it has been 'tied' to the associated path by a Local Rule (as I guess are the other drains), it should be treated as a Penalty Area and I would suggest so should the drain hole at the end.

> > > > But IMO the course should really tie it to the path as one Immovable Obstruction.

> > >

> > > The drainage run was indeed an open concrete channel along the ground, connecting to the vertical hole with the lattice cover.

> > > So without a local rule, it would be treated as a penalty area?

> >

> > In my part of the world, most concrete drains on the course are Immovable Obstructions, not penalty areas. And even concrete water channels that run directly across fairways can be treated as IOs in situations where they are only there to channel irregular rainfall - that is, they are not 'normally' channeling water - so it is a Committee discretion in such circumstances. This interpretation has previously been tested with the Ruling Bodies.

>

> I would thought so too. In the old days also French drains gave you free relief. Soon someone will say a grate on top of well is penalty area...

 

French Drains were/are Immovable Obstructions by definition. For some reason the USGA (but not the R&A) recommended that they should be marked and deemed as GUR. The R&A thought it unnecessary. I was involved in the debate at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @Sawgrass said:

> > @No_Catchy_Nickname said:

> > > @Newby said:

> > > > @No_Catchy_Nickname said:

> > > > Playing as a junior in the UK, I remember drainage ditches were usually treated as lateral water hazards, but they were staked red. The drainage hole at this course had no marking, so my guess was free relief.

> > >

> > > The significant words in the definition in that case are "surface drainage ditch or other **open watercourse** (even if not containing water),...."

> > > Is the 'drainage run' an open concrete channel along the ground, leading to the vertical(?) hole with the lattice cover?

> > > Unless it has been 'tied' to the associated path by a Local Rule (as I guess are the other drains), it should be treated as a Penalty Area and I would suggest so should the drain hole at the end.

> > > But IMO the course should really tie it to the path as one Immovable Obstruction.

> >

> > The drainage run was indeed an open concrete channel along the ground, connecting to the vertical hole with the lattice cover.

> > So without a local rule, it would be treated as a penalty area?

>

> IMO it would be treated as a penalty area with our without a local rule. (I doubt that it would be permissible to have a course feature which is a penalty area by definition turned into a segment of general area by local rule -- but these issues are dealt with case by case so, who knows!)

 

Like the [model local rule B-4](https://www.randa.org/en/rog/2019/rules/committee-procedures/8b#b-4 "model local rule B-4")? :)

Swing DNA: 91/4/3/6/6
Woods: ST 180 or MP-650 - Irons: MP-H5 / MP-53 / MP-4, KBS Tour S - 50º: MP-T5 / 55º: FG Tour PMP  / 60º: RTX ZipCore - Mizuno Bettinardi BC-4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @Halebopp said:

> > @Sawgrass said:

> > > @No_Catchy_Nickname said:

> > > > @Newby said:

> > > > > @No_Catchy_Nickname said:

> > > > > Playing as a junior in the UK, I remember drainage ditches were usually treated as lateral water hazards, but they were staked red. The drainage hole at this course had no marking, so my guess was free relief.

> > > >

> > > > The significant words in the definition in that case are "surface drainage ditch or other **open watercourse** (even if not containing water),...."

> > > > Is the 'drainage run' an open concrete channel along the ground, leading to the vertical(?) hole with the lattice cover?

> > > > Unless it has been 'tied' to the associated path by a Local Rule (as I guess are the other drains), it should be treated as a Penalty Area and I would suggest so should the drain hole at the end.

> > > > But IMO the course should really tie it to the path as one Immovable Obstruction.

> > >

> > > The drainage run was indeed an open concrete channel along the ground, connecting to the vertical hole with the lattice cover.

> > > So without a local rule, it would be treated as a penalty area?

> >

> > IMO it would be treated as a penalty area with our without a local rule. (I doubt that it would be permissible to have a course feature which is a penalty area by definition turned into a segment of general area by local rule -- but these issues are dealt with case by case so, who knows!)

>

> Like the [model local rule B-4](https://www.randa.org/en/rog/2019/rules/committee-procedures/8b#b-4 "model local rule B-4")? :)

 

Thank you! (Apparently, some do know!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the 3 meter long run of 20cm wide U-shaped concrete blocks from the corner of the club house are penalty area and not immovable obstruction, without the LR?

Ping G15 Titleist 950R Titleist 910D2 Titleist TS2
Titleist 910f 3W
Callaway XHot hybrid
Titleist 735cm Titleist AP2
Vokey wedges
Tri-Ball SRT Odyssey Works Versa #1 Tank Scotty Cameron Futura 5W

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My experience in refereeing where these concrete U-channels are present (in Japan) is that those adjoining paved cart paths are deemed to be part of the cart path. Those that are not adjoining a cart path, ie, in the general area, are normally covered with a grill (probably for safety reasons) and were also deemed to be immovable obstructions. The Committee has authority to do both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @rogolf said:

> My experience in refereeing where these concrete U-channels are present (in Japan) is that those adjoining paved cart paths are deemed to be part of the cart path. Those that are not adjoining a cart path, ie, in the general area, are normally covered with a grill (probably for safety reasons) and were also deemed to be immovable obstructions. The Committee has authority to do both.

 

That's the case here, as it happened on a Japanese course. However, not all the drain/gutter is covered by a grill, only the vertical drain the gutter runs into. I think what happened is that the ball went into the gutter/drain (U-shaped concrete blocks), and rolled down into the vertical drain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Mr. Bean" said:

> > @QEight said:

> > So the 3 meter long run of 20cm wide U-shaped concrete blocks from the corner of the club house are penalty area and not immovable obstruction, without the LR?

>

> Welcome to the Rules 2019! :D

 

I don't think the new interpretation actually changed anything in 2019, I think it was bringing a previous ruling into the interpretations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about drainage hole in middle of the rough, covered with a lattice/grill? No ditch or anything, just a low point of terrain? IO or PA?

Ping G15 Titleist 950R Titleist 910D2 Titleist TS2
Titleist 910f 3W
Callaway XHot hybrid
Titleist 735cm Titleist AP2
Vokey wedges
Tri-Ball SRT Odyssey Works Versa #1 Tank Scotty Cameron Futura 5W

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @QEight said:

> What about drainage hole in middle of the rough, covered with a lattice/grill? No ditch or anything, just a low point of terrain? IO or PA?

 

> @QEight said:

> What about drainage hole in middle of the rough, covered with a lattice/grill? No ditch or anything, just a low point of terrain? IO or PA?

 

We have a number of drainage holes and they have nothing to do with water runways/ditches. They include in bunkers and areas that simply hold some surface water (temporary water) when it is wet. No local rule, none required, simply IOs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @No_Catchy_Nickname said:

> > @rogolf said:

> > My experience in refereeing where these concrete U-channels are present (in Japan) is that those adjoining paved cart paths are deemed to be part of the cart path. Those that are not adjoining a cart path, ie, in the general area, are normally covered with a grill (probably for safety reasons) and were also deemed to be immovable obstructions. The Committee has authority to do both.

>

> That's the case here, as it happened on a Japanese course. However, not all the drain/gutter is covered by a grill, only the vertical drain the gutter runs into. I think what happened is that the ball went into the gutter/drain (U-shaped concrete blocks), and rolled down into the vertical drain.

Given what you've posted, I would rule that the ball is in an immovable obstruction and free relief is available. In this instance imo, discussions about a penalty area are off base.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @rogolf said:

> > @No_Catchy_Nickname said:

> > > @rogolf said:

> > > My experience in refereeing where these concrete U-channels are present (in Japan) is that those adjoining paved cart paths are deemed to be part of the cart path. Those that are not adjoining a cart path, ie, in the general area, are normally covered with a grill (probably for safety reasons) and were also deemed to be immovable obstructions. The Committee has authority to do both.

> >

> > That's the case here, as it happened on a Japanese course. However, not all the drain/gutter is covered by a grill, only the vertical drain the gutter runs into. I think what happened is that the ball went into the gutter/drain (U-shaped concrete blocks), and rolled down into the vertical drain.

> Given what you've posted, I would rule that the ball is in an immovable obstruction and free relief is available. In this instance imo, discussions about a penalty area are off base.

>

 

That's how we played it, which is a relief, if you'll pardon the pun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #3
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Matt (LFG) Every - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Sahith Theegala - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Cameron putters (and new "LD" grip) - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Bettinardi MB & CB irons - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Bettinardi API putter cover - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Swag API covers - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Golf Pride Reverse Taper grips - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 15 replies
    • 2024 Cognizant Classic - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #1
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #2
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #3
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #4
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Brandt Snedeker - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Max Greyserman - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Eric Cole - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Carl Yuan - WITb - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Russell Henley - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Justin Sun - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alex Noren - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Shane Lowry - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Taylor Montgomery - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jake Knapp (KnappTime_ltd) - WITB - - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Super Stoke Pistol Lock 1.0 & 2.0 grips - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      LA Golf new insert putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Garsen Quad Tour 15 grip - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Swag covers - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jacob Bridgeman's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Bud Cauley's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Ryo Hisatsune's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Chris Kirk - new black Callaway Apex CB irons and a few Odyssey putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alejandro Tosti's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 2 replies
    • 2024 Genesis Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #3
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #4
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Rory McIlroy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Sepp Straka - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Patrick Rodgers - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Brendon Todd - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Denny McCarthy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Corey Conners - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Chase Johnson - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tommy Fleetwood - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Matt Fitzpatrick - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Si Woo Kim - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Viktor Hovland - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Wyndham Clark - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Cam Davis - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Nick Taylor - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Ben Baller WITB update (New putter, driver, hybrid and shafts) – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Vortex Golf rangefinder - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Fujikura Ventus shaft - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods & TaylorMade "Sun Day Red" apparel launch event, product photos – 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods Sun Day Red golf shoes - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Aretera shafts - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Toulon putters - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods' new white "Sun Day Red" golf shoe prototypes – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      • 22 replies
    • 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put and questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open - Monday #1
      2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open - Monday #2
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Ben Taylor - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Garrick Higgo - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Billy Horschel - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Justin Lower - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Lanto Griffin - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Bud Cauley - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Corbin Burnes (2021 NL Cy Young) - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Greyson Sigg - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Charley Hoffman - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Nico Echavarria - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Victor Perez - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Sami Valimaki - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Ryo Hisatsune - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      Jake Knapp's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      New Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Tyler Duncan's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Greyson Sigg's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Sunjae Im's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Ping's Waste Management putter covers - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Vincent Whaley's custom Cameron - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Odyssey Waste Management putter covers - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Super Stroke custom grips - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Zac Blair's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Bettinardi Waste Management putter covers - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
       
       
       
       
       
       

       
      • 12 replies
    • 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put and questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am - Tuesday #1
       
       
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Justin Thomas - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Nick Hardy - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Seamus Power - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Adam Hadwin - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Kurt Kitayama - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Byeong Hun An - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Nicolai Hojgaard - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Sam Burns - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Brandon Wu - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      JT Poston - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Nick Dunlap - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Alex Smalley - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Pau Gasol WITB (2x NBA Champion, 6x All-Star) – 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Josh Allen WITB (NFL Quarterback, Buffalo Bills) – 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Matt Kuchar - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      JJ Spaun - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Jordan Spieth - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Adam Svensson - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Adam Scott (mini) - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Taylor Moore - WITB - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      Ping putters - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      TaylorMade putters - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Pebble Beach Golf Links (holes 7 & 8) – 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Odyssey putters - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Lucas Glover going to test black Srixon ZX5 & ZX7 irons - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Justin Thomas wrist training aid - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Stephen Sweeney's Putting Ballistic putting training aid - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
      Chris Kirk club changes - 2024 AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am
       
       
       
       
       
      • 2 replies

×
×
  • Create New...