Jump to content

Ping irons..... power/std/retro lofts?


buckhorn70

Recommended Posts

Weakening loft adds a small amount of effective bounce and may also very slightly reduce the perception of offset, strengthening decreases bounce and increases the look of offset. It's all very subtle and has little to no effect on playability. If you are worried about bounce you could also order one of Ping's custom grinds.

  • Like 1

USGA Index: ~0

[b]WITB[/b]:
Ping G410 LST 9 degree - Tour AD IZ 6x
Ping G410 LST - Fujikura Pro TourSpec 73 
Kasco K2K 33 - Fujikura Pro TourSpec 73 
Callaway RazrX Tour 4h - Tour 95 shaft
Ping i200 5-UW (2 flat) - Nippon Modus 105X
Taylormade HiToe 54 (bent to 55 & 2 flat)
Taylormade HiToe 64 (Bent to 62 & 2 flat)
Palmer AP30R putter (circa 1960s)
Taylormade TP5X Ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @buckhorn70 said:

> I see Ping has options for 3 choices of lofts..... Power/STD/Retro. If I order a set of Ping 210’s I would want retro lofts to get my PW at 47 degrees to compliment my 52/58 Wedge set up.

>

> Question is By going retro loft....... Does this negatively effect bounce or any attribute/playability of the club?

I wouldn't do this across the set. I would just weaken the PW one degree to 46 and play the rest of the I210s at standard loft. This would give you 41, 46, 52, 58 for 9i through LW. I've played this combo for the last 15 years with zero gapping issues.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"hd.softail" said:

> > @buckhorn70 said:

> > I see Ping has options for 3 choices of lofts..... Power/STD/Retro. If I order a set of Ping 210’s I would want retro lofts to get my PW at 47 degrees to compliment my 52/58 Wedge set up.

> >

> > Question is By going retro loft....... Does this negatively effect bounce or any attribute/playability of the club?

> I wouldn't do this across the set. I would just weaken the PW one degree to 46 and play the rest of the I210s at standard loft. This would give you 41, 46, 52, 58 for 9i through LW. I've played this combo for the last 15 years with zero gapping issues.

>

 

 

Never thought of this idea..... sounds like a good plan though.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @buckhorn70 said:

> > @"hd.softail" said:

> > > @buckhorn70 said:

> > > I see Ping has options for 3 choices of lofts..... Power/STD/Retro. If I order a set of Ping 210’s I would want retro lofts to get my PW at 47 degrees to compliment my 52/58 Wedge set up.

> > >

> > > Question is By going retro loft....... Does this negatively effect bounce or any attribute/playability of the club?

> > I wouldn't do this across the set. I would just weaken the PW one degree to 46 and play the rest of the I210s at standard loft. This would give you 41, 46, 52, 58 for 9i through LW. I've played this combo for the last 15 years with zero gapping issues.

> >

>

>

> Never thought of this idea..... sounds like a good plan though.

>

 

I could go either way on this because that could end up leaving 15ish yards between your P and 9i. Once you get the clubs, you could get on a launch monitor and figure out what exactly you need gapping wise. I think distances are more important than actual lofts, because your i210 PW might go further than your standard 52 wedge, if that makes sense!

Taylormade M2 2017 9.5 Taylormade M4 16.5 Taylormade RBZ 3 iron bent to 17.5 Taylormade Tour Preferred MC 4-PW Vokey SM5 Black 50, 54, 58 Taylormade Spider S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @Davidelliott100 said:

> > @buckhorn70 said:

> > > @"hd.softail" said:

> > > > @buckhorn70 said:

> > > > I see Ping has options for 3 choices of lofts..... Power/STD/Retro. If I order a set of Ping 210’s I would want retro lofts to get my PW at 47 degrees to compliment my 52/58 Wedge set up.

> > > >

> > > > Question is By going retro loft....... Does this negatively effect bounce or any attribute/playability of the club?

> > > I wouldn't do this across the set. I would just weaken the PW one degree to 46 and play the rest of the I210s at standard loft. This would give you 41, 46, 52, 58 for 9i through LW. I've played this combo for the last 15 years with zero gapping issues.

> > >

> >

> >

> > Never thought of this idea..... sounds like a good plan though.

> >

>

> I could go either way on this because that could end up leaving 15ish yards between your P and 9i. Once you get the clubs, you could get on a launch monitor and figure out what exactly you need gapping wise. I think distances are more important than actual lofts, because your i210 PW might go further than your standard 52 wedge, if that makes sense.

 

I think I know what you are saying.... I would think the 210 PW would go further than a 52 Wedge.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @dpb5031 said:

> Weakening loft adds a small amount of effective bounce and may also very slightly reduce the perception of offset, strengthening decreases bounce and increases the look of offset. It's all very subtle and has little to no effect on playability. If you are worried about bounce you could also order one of Ping's custom grinds.

 

Does Ping bend heads to get their retro and power lofts, or do they produce different heads? If they produce different heads from different molds, it shouldn't effect bounce or offset.

Driver #1: Callaway Epic Max LS, 9°

Driver #2: Adams Speedline F11, 9.5°

Fairway: Callaway Rogue ST Max LS, 18°

Utility Iron: Titleist 718 AP3, 19°

Irons: Titleist 718 AP1, 5-GW, 24°-48°
UW: Titleist Vokey SM8, 52°F

LW: Titleist Vokey SM8, 60°D
Putter: Cameron Studio Style Newport 2.5, 33"
Ball: Bridgestone Tour B RX
Bag: Sun Mountain Metro Sunday Bag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @tatertot said:

> > @dpb5031 said:

> > Weakening loft adds a small amount of effective bounce and may also very slightly reduce the perception of offset, strengthening decreases bounce and increases the look of offset. It's all very subtle and has little to no effect on playability. If you are worried about bounce you could also order one of Ping's custom grinds.

>

> Does Ping bend heads to get their retro and power lofts, or do they produce different heads? If they produce different heads from different molds, it shouldn't effect bounce or offset.

 

Pretty sure they bend them but someone correct me if I'm wrong. Pings already have higher bounce (which I like) but weakening too much would worry me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @buckhorn70 said:

> > @Davidelliott100 said:

> > > @buckhorn70 said:

> > > > @"hd.softail" said:

> > > > > @buckhorn70 said:

> > > > > I see Ping has options for 3 choices of lofts..... Power/STD/Retro. If I order a set of Ping 210’s I would want retro lofts to get my PW at 47 degrees to compliment my 52/58 Wedge set up.

> > > > >

> > > > > Question is By going retro loft....... Does this negatively effect bounce or any attribute/playability of the club?

> > > > I wouldn't do this across the set. I would just weaken the PW one degree to 46 and play the rest of the I210s at standard loft. This would give you 41, 46, 52, 58 for 9i through LW. I've played this combo for the last 15 years with zero gapping issues.

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Never thought of this idea..... sounds like a good plan though.

> > >

> >

> > I could go either way on this because that could end up leaving 15ish yards between your P and 9i. Once you get the clubs, you could get on a launch monitor and figure out what exactly you need gapping wise. I think distances are more important than actual lofts, because your i210 PW might go further than your standard 52 wedge, if that makes sense.

>

> I think I know what you are saying.... I would think the 210 PW would go further than a 52 Wedge.

>

>

 

A lot of times a set "wedge" will go further than a specialty wedge of the same loft. A 50* gap wedge from a set will often go a little further than a 50* specialty wedge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @RacineBoxer said:

> > @buckhorn70 said:

> > > @Davidelliott100 said:

> > > > @buckhorn70 said:

> > > > > @"hd.softail" said:

> > > > > > @buckhorn70 said:

> > > > > > I see Ping has options for 3 choices of lofts..... Power/STD/Retro. If I order a set of Ping 210’s I would want retro lofts to get my PW at 47 degrees to compliment my 52/58 Wedge set up.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Question is By going retro loft....... Does this negatively effect bounce or any attribute/playability of the club?

> > > > > I wouldn't do this across the set. I would just weaken the PW one degree to 46 and play the rest of the I210s at standard loft. This would give you 41, 46, 52, 58 for 9i through LW. I've played this combo for the last 15 years with zero gapping issues.

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Never thought of this idea..... sounds like a good plan though.

> > > >

> > >

> > > I could go either way on this because that could end up leaving 15ish yards between your P and 9i. Once you get the clubs, you could get on a launch monitor and figure out what exactly you need gapping wise. I think distances are more important than actual lofts, because your i210 PW might go further than your standard 52 wedge, if that makes sense.

> >

> > I think I know what you are saying.... I would think the 210 PW would go further than a 52 Wedge.

> >

> >

>

> A lot of times a set "wedge" will go further than a specialty wedge of the same loft. A 50* gap wedge from a set will often go a little further than a 50* specialty wedge.

 

I find full shots the same but get jumpers with set gap wedges on partial shots. That said, I know the Glides exist, but I would LOVE an iBlade UW. The PW is just so d**m nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @balls_deep said:

> > @RacineBoxer said:

> > > @buckhorn70 said:

> > > > @Davidelliott100 said:

> > > > > @buckhorn70 said:

> > > > > > @"hd.softail" said:

> > > > > > > @buckhorn70 said:

> > > > > > > I see Ping has options for 3 choices of lofts..... Power/STD/Retro. If I order a set of Ping 210’s I would want retro lofts to get my PW at 47 degrees to compliment my 52/58 Wedge set up.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Question is By going retro loft....... Does this negatively effect bounce or any attribute/playability of the club?

> > > > > > I wouldn't do this across the set. I would just weaken the PW one degree to 46 and play the rest of the I210s at standard loft. This would give you 41, 46, 52, 58 for 9i through LW. I've played this combo for the last 15 years with zero gapping issues.

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Never thought of this idea..... sounds like a good plan though.

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > I could go either way on this because that could end up leaving 15ish yards between your P and 9i. Once you get the clubs, you could get on a launch monitor and figure out what exactly you need gapping wise. I think distances are more important than actual lofts, because your i210 PW might go further than your standard 52 wedge, if that makes sense.

> > >

> > > I think I know what you are saying.... I would think the 210 PW would go further than a 52 Wedge.

> > >

> > >

> >

> > A lot of times a set "wedge" will go further than a specialty wedge of the same loft. A 50* gap wedge from a set will often go a little further than a 50* specialty wedge.

>

> I find full shots the same but get jumpers with set gap wedges on partial shots. That said, I know the Glides exist, but I would LOVE an iBlade UW. The PW is just so d**m nice.

 

Yeah I think this is spot on. It seems like a majority of clubs nowadays are engineered for distance with distance control/accuracy as a close second (the exception maybe being a muscle back or small players cavity). Wedges on the other hand play more dead and are definitely designed to be distance controlled IMO. Neither is bad and some distance irons can be extremely consistent distance wise, but have never been as consistent as a true wedge for me.

Taylormade M2 2017 9.5 Taylormade M4 16.5 Taylormade RBZ 3 iron bent to 17.5 Taylormade Tour Preferred MC 4-PW Vokey SM5 Black 50, 54, 58 Taylormade Spider S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"hd.softail" said:

> > @buckhorn70 said:

> > I see Ping has options for 3 choices of lofts..... Power/STD/Retro. If I order a set of Ping 210’s I would want retro lofts to get my PW at 47 degrees to compliment my 52/58 Wedge set up.

> >

> > Question is By going retro loft....... Does this negatively effect bounce or any attribute/playability of the club?

> I wouldn't do this across the set. I would just weaken the PW one degree to 46 and play the rest of the I210s at standard loft. This would give you 41, 46, 52, 58 for 9i through LW. I've played this combo for the last 15 years with zero gapping issues.

>

 

I like @"hd.softail" 's approach, 41*/46* is the standard gapping for Mizuno 919 Forged and Srixon Z785. I don't want my 5 iron too weak since its my longest iron, and 28* in the retro spec probably creates the need to insert another club at the top end of the bag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @tatertot said:

> > @dpb5031 said:

> > Weakening loft adds a small amount of effective bounce and may also very slightly reduce the perception of offset, strengthening decreases bounce and increases the look of offset. It's all very subtle and has little to no effect on playability. If you are worried about bounce you could also order one of Ping's custom grinds.

>

> Does Ping bend heads to get their retro and power lofts, or do they produce different heads? If they produce different heads from different molds, it shouldn't effect bounce or offset.

 

Bend

USGA Index: ~0

[b]WITB[/b]:
Ping G410 LST 9 degree - Tour AD IZ 6x
Ping G410 LST - Fujikura Pro TourSpec 73 
Kasco K2K 33 - Fujikura Pro TourSpec 73 
Callaway RazrX Tour 4h - Tour 95 shaft
Ping i200 5-UW (2 flat) - Nippon Modus 105X
Taylormade HiToe 54 (bent to 55 & 2 flat)
Taylormade HiToe 64 (Bent to 62 & 2 flat)
Palmer AP30R putter (circa 1960s)
Taylormade TP5X Ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @dpb5031 said:

> Weakening loft adds a small amount of effective bounce and may also very slightly reduce the perception of offset, strengthening decreases bounce and increases the look of offset. It's all very subtle and has little to no effect on playability. If you are worried about bounce you could also order one of Ping's custom grinds.

 

Actually, bending weak adds bounce and reduces offset period. No "...effective bounce" or "...the perception of offset." It's more factual than that.

  • Like 2

Ping G400 Max driver w/Aldila Rogue 125 Silver
Ping G425 5 wood & hybrid
Ping G30 irons w/Recoil 95

Ping G425 irons w/Accra ICWT 2.0 95
Ping Glide wedges w/Recoil 110
Ping Redwood Anser - the "real deal!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • 2024 Zurich Classic - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Zurich Classic - Monday #1
      2024 Zurich Classic - Monday #2
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Alex Fitzpatrick - WITB - 2024 Zurich Classic
      Austin Cook - WITB - 2024 Zurich Classic
      Alejandro Tosti - WITB - 2024 Zurich Classic
      Davis Riley - WITB - 2024 Zurich Classic
      MJ Daffue - WITB - 2024 Zurich Classic
      Nate Lashley - WITB - 2024 Zurich Classic
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      MJ Daffue's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Zurich Classic
      Cameron putters - 2024 Zurich Classic
      Swag covers ( a few custom for Nick Hardy) - 2024 Zurich Classic
      Custom Bettinardi covers for Matt and Alex Fitzpatrick - 2024 Zurich Classic
       
       
       
      • 1 reply
    • 2024 RBC Heritage - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 RBC Heritage - Monday #1
      2024 RBC Heritage - Monday #2
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Justin Thomas - WITB - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Justin Rose - WITB - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Chandler Phillips - WITB - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Nick Dunlap - WITB - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Thomas Detry - WITB - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Austin Eckroat - WITB - 2024 RBC Heritage
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      Wyndham Clark's Odyssey putter - 2024 RBC Heritage
      JT's new Cameron putter - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Justin Thomas testing new Titleist 2 wood - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Cameron putters - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Odyssey putter with triple track alignment aid - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Scotty Cameron The Blk Box putting alignment aid/training aid - 2024 RBC Heritage
       
       
       
       
       
       
      • 7 replies
    • 2024 Masters - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Huge shoutout to our member Stinger2irons for taking and posting photos from Augusta
       
       
      Tuesday
       
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 1
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 2
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 3
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 4
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 5
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 6
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 7
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 8
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 9
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 10
       
       
       
      • 14 replies
    • Rory McIlroy testing a new TaylorMade "PROTO" 4-iron – 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Rory McIlroy testing a new TaylorMade "PROTO" 4-iron – 2024 Valero Texas Open
        • Like
      • 93 replies
    • 2024 Valero Texas Open - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or Comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Valero Texas Open - Monday #1
      2024 Valero Texas Open - Tuesday #1
       
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Ben Taylor - WITB - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Paul Barjon - WITB - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Joe Sullivan - WITB - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Wilson Furr - WITB - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Ben Willman - SoTex PGA Section Champ - WITB - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Jimmy Stanger - WITB - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Rickie Fowler - WITB - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Harrison Endycott - WITB - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Vince Whaley - WITB - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Kevin Chappell - WITB - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Christian Bezuidenhout - WITB (mini) - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Scott Gutschewski - WITB - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Michael S. Kim WITB – 2024 Valero Texas Open
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      Cameron putter - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Ben Taylor with new Titleist TRS 2 wood - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Swag cover - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Greyson Sigg's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Davis Riley's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Josh Teater's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Hzrdus T1100 is back - - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Mark Hubbard testing ported Titleist irons – 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Tyson Alexander testing new Titleist TRS 2 wood - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Hideki Matsuyama's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Cobra putters - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Joel Dahmen WITB – 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Axis 1 broomstick putter - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Rory McIlroy testing a new TaylorMade "PROTO" 4-iron – 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Rory McIlroy's Trackman numbers w/ driver on the range – 2024 Valero Texas Open
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 4 replies

×
×
  • Create New...