GIVEAWAY: PING Heppler Anser 2 Putter- ENTER HERE, Tour Edge Exotics EXS Pro 3W - ENTER HERE.

2019 TaylorMade P790 irons (4-iron, 7-iron, PW in-hand pics)

 BAlberstadt ·  
BAlberstadtBAlberstadt GolfWRX Staff WriterUnited StatesMarshals, Media Staffer  173WRX Points: 58Posts: 173 Marshals
Joined:  in Tour and Pre-Release Equipment #1















Posted:
«1
2

Comments

  • MCGolfTMMCGolfTM Members  665WRX Points: 62Handicap: 5.8Posts: 665 Golden Tee
    Joined:  #2

    Really liking the subtle look improvements this time around. Looking forward to hitting them and seeing any changes to the 2017 P790 gamers.

    Posted:
    TM M5 460 9* Fujikura Pro73
    TM M6 3W Fujikura Pro 2.0
    TM M6 5W Kuro Kage
    TM P790 UDI 17* PX HZRDUS Black 85
    TM P790 4-8 DG 105
    TM P770 9-PW KBS FLT 120
    TM Milled Grind 50/54 KBS 610
    TM Spider X
    TM TP5x
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • gsrjcgsrjc TOC Members  1899WRX Points: 609Posts: 1,899 Platinum Tees
    Joined:  #3

    The lofts are really strong. I don’t understand what TM means though in their article when they say the lofts have to be this strong to have a good ball flight. Is it because so much weight is needed by the tungsten but isn’t the overall head weight the same as if they used steel.

    Posted:
  • Zach HeusserZach Heusser Marshals  5195WRX Points: 168Handicap: proPosts: 5,195 Marshals
    Joined:  #4

    Man those are strong! Pitching wedge looks like an 8 iron

    Posted:
    Teaching out of Crystal Springs Golf Course<br /><br />Golf Digest Best Teachers In California 2005-2018<br /><br />Golf Digest Best Young Teachers In America 2007-2012<br /><br />Head Men's Golf Coach Notre Dame de Namur University <br /><br />My WITB<br /><br /><br /><br />http://www.golfwrx.c...-man-cave-pics/<br />
    On -, @Zheusser on twitter
  • BrennanfBrennanf Members  89WRX Points: 33Posts: 89 Fairways
    Joined:  #5

    Clean, but not a winner to my eye. Prefer my old rsi tp heads

    Posted:
  • mtex22mtex22 San Diego, CAMembers  2343WRX Points: 233Posts: 2,343 BST Banned
    Joined:  #6

    Is it me or do they have more offset this year. The 7 iron is really noticeable to me

    Posted:
    SRIXON Z785 Tour 9.5 FL (Flat Head) - Diamana BF 60
    HONMA 747 15 - Vizard 70 
    CALLAWAY APEX 20- Matrix Altus Tour H8
    BRIDGESTONE J15CB 4-PW - Modus 105 
    VOKEY SM7 Raw Black 50/54/58 - Hi Rev 2.0
    ODYSSEY Tri-Hot #1
  • golfing_penguingolfing_penguin Members  443WRX Points: 85Posts: 443 Greens
    Joined:  #7

    On -, @gsrjc said:

    The lofts are really strong. I don’t understand what TM means though in their article when they say the lofts have to be this strong to have a good ball flight. Is it because so much weight is needed by the tungsten but isn’t the overall head weight the same as if they used steel.

    It's largely marketing with a dash of truth. Comparing loft for loft on these and a similar club from yester-year (maybe the 7 iron in these and a 5 iron in a similarly-intentioned set from the early 00's) will see these peak higher, but only by a few feet, not 20ft like they'd have you believe

    Posted:
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • grm24grm24 Western PAMembers  4595WRX Points: 1,623Posts: 4,595 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #8

    On -, @Zach Heusser said:

    Man those are strong! Pitching wedge looks like an 8 iron

    Same lofts (3-PW) as the original 2017 P790 irons. Some irons a 1/4 inch longer. Some lies angles slightly different.
    http://www.taylormadegolf.com/on/demandware.static/-/Sites-TMaG-Library/default/docs/productspecs/2017/P790 Irons.pdf

    https://www.taylormadegolf.com/P790-Irons/DW-AL464.html?lang=default

    Posted:
  • SwingBluesSwingBlues We are the Old Dark Navy Blues Members  3513WRX Points: 169Posts: 3,513 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #9

    Cleaner look especially the T logo, really like that. But lower screw & tungsten weight placement so it should be higher launch & probably a tad more forgiveness. I really don’t need more launch as I am already tweaking my Gen 1 P790 to be lower, **** Modus are too high at the moment. I like this Gen 2 though, well done TM

    Posted:
    Callaway Epic Flash SubZero 9*, Fujikura Ventus 6-S finished 44.5"
    Honma 737 13* 3 wood, Vizard A 50S shaft
    Honma 737 18* 5 wood, Vizard A 50S shaft
    Taylormade UDI 2 iron, 18* KBS C-Taper Lite

    Taylormade P790 4-PW, Dynamic Gold 105 S300 with ProSoft inserts, Pure Wrap grips
    Ben Hogan 2018 Equalizer 48* and 52* Forged wedges
    Nike Engage Toe Sweep 56* wedge
    Directed Force Reno "2.05" (Presse IV tweaked) Putter with BGT Stability shaft


    Ball: Srixon XV, 2019 Taylormade TP-5x
    Swing: PPGS, a Surgite !!!
  • EricWGolfEricWGolf Members  766WRX Points: 447Posts: 766 Golden Tee
    Joined:  edited Aug 13, 2019 #10

    On -, @mtex22 said:

    Is it me or do they have more offset this year. The 7 iron is really noticeable to me

    Offset is identical in 7-Gap, with slightly less offset in 3-6.

    Posted:
  • jll62jll62 MinneapolisClubWRX  2391WRX Points: 688Handicap: +2.2Posts: 2,391 ClubWRX
    Joined:  #11

    On -, @gsrjc said:

    The lofts are really strong. I don’t understand what TM means though in their article when they say the lofts have to be this strong to have a good ball flight. Is it because so much weight is needed by the tungsten but isn’t the overall head weight the same as if they used steel.

    These heads naturally have a higher launch angle because of two things: the speed pocket in the sole and the low CG (compared to a traditional irons). The lofts are strengthened to account for those factors so that TM can hit their desired launch window and also ensure an optimal descent angle to offset the reduction in spin.

    It's not just about marketing. If you weaken the lofts to what everyone considers traditional lofts, these will launch very high and not perform as well as they do near their spec'd loft.

    Posted:
    TaylorMade M5 8.0, Diamana Kai'li 60S, 44.75"
    TaylorMade M5 Rocket 3, Tensei Blue X, 42.5"
    TaylorMade SIM Max Rescue 19, Fujikura Atmos Blue Tour Spec 8X Hybrid
    TaylorMade P790 3, Nippon Modus 130 stiff
    TaylorMade P750 4-PW, Nippon Modus 130 stiff
    TaylorMade MG2 52, DG S400 Tour Issue
    TaylorMade Hi-Toe 58, DG S400 Tour Issue
    TaylorMade Itsy Bitsy JDay Proto, 34"
    TaylorMade TP5

    jll62's WITB
  • JoeJoeJoeUrBoatJoeJoeJoeUrBoat Leamington OntarioMembers  885WRX Points: 179Handicap: 4.9Posts: 885 Golden Tee
    Joined:  #12

    On -, @jll62 said:

    On -, @gsrjc said:

    The lofts are really strong. I don’t understand what TM means though in their article when they say the lofts have to be this strong to have a good ball flight. Is it because so much weight is needed by the tungsten but isn’t the overall head weight the same as if they used steel.

    These heads naturally have a higher launch angle because of two things: the speed pocket in the sole and the low CG (compared to a traditional irons). The lofts are strengthened to account for those factors so that TM can hit their desired launch window and also ensure an optimal descent angle to offset the reduction in spin.

    It's not just about marketing. If you weaken the lofts to what everyone considers traditional lofts, these will launch very high and not perform as well as they do near their spec'd loft.

    Exactly, the lofts counter the tech to optimize flight.

    Posted:
    TS3 10.5 HZRDUS Smoke 6.0
    TS3 15 HZRDUS Smoke 6.0
    TS3 19 HZRDUS Smoke 6.0
    PXG Gen 3 0311p 3-PW DG120
    0311 Forged 52-56-60 DG120
    Rory McIlroy Scotty Cameron "RORS"
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • EricWGolfEricWGolf Members  766WRX Points: 447Posts: 766 Golden Tee
    Joined:  #13

    On -, @jll62 said:

    The lofts are strengthened to account for those factors so that TM can hit their desired launch window and also ensure an optimal descent angle to offset the reduction in spin.

    That’s what always seems to get lost in these discussions about loft: loft is a means to an end, not the end itself. Launch angle and descent angle are the desired outcomes. Loft (along with CG) is just another variable to be manipulated to achieve proper launch and descent.

    And if TM can manipulate CG and loft so that a 7 iron still launches, peaks, and descends like a 7 iron should, but goes further . . . why wouldn’t they?

    With the advent of Trackman and multi-material head construction, loft numbers are largely irrelevant except when comparing one model to itself (e.g., M5 9* driver to M5 10.5* driver) for fitting purposes.
    There are just too many variables between head models (e.g., blade vs. SGI) and companies (e.g., TM players iron vs Titleist players iron) to view loft as an apples to apples comparison anymore.

    Posted:
  • hankmoodyhankmoody Members  1821WRX Points: 128Posts: 1,821 Platinum Tees
    Joined:  #14

    Yes as to the lofts. I remember a designer saying the goal was a 7i that launched as high as a 7, carried like a 6, and was as easy to hit as an 8.
    The tech balances the lofts to achieve the desired launch, height, spin, and distance. Shaft of course factors in as well.

    Posted:
    M6 10.5
    M4 3W
    Titleist 816h 21
    CF19 5-AW
    SM6 54 & Cally PM 60
    Byron Morgan 612
    V1X/ERC Soft
  • neillmacparguyneillmacparguy Members  76WRX Points: 75Posts: 76 Fairways
    Joined:  #15

    Still one of my favorite irons in recent years. Clean!

    Posted:

    Neill A. MacLeod III
    Greenwood, NS
    Callaway Epic 9 deg
    Callaway Epic Flash 15 deg
    Adams Black Super Hybrid 15deg
    Miura CB-501 irons
    Scotty Cameron Fastback 34”

  • EricWGolfEricWGolf Members  766WRX Points: 447Posts: 766 Golden Tee
    Joined:  #16

    On -, @hankmoody said:

    I remember a designer saying the goal was a 7i that launched as high as a 7, carried like a 6, and was as easy to hit as an 8.

    I would add “has a descent angle like a 7 iron.” Descent angle is arguably the most important factor when getting fit for irons. No point in having a 7 iron that flies high and carries far if you can’t stop it over a hazard onto a green with a front pin placement. If a 7 iron rolls out 30 feet past the pin because the angle of descent is too flat, then it’s not really useful as a 7 iron.

    Posted:
  • jll62jll62 MinneapolisClubWRX  2391WRX Points: 688Handicap: +2.2Posts: 2,391 ClubWRX
    Joined:  #17

    On -, @EricWGolf said:

    On -, @hankmoody said:

    I remember a designer saying the goal was a 7i that launched as high as a 7, carried like a 6, and was as easy to hit as an 8.

    I would add “has a descent angle like a 7 iron.” Descent angle is arguably the most important factor when getting fit for irons. No point in having a 7 iron that flies high and carries far if you can’t stop it over a hazard onto a green with a front pin placement. If a 7 iron rolls out 30 feet past the pin because the angle of descent is too flat, then it’s not really useful as a 7 iron.

    100%. Eventually players are going to realize that the way to stop shots on the green is via descent angle, rather than spin. The OEMs already know this.

    Every year I debate switching to what I like to call "point and shoot" irons like the P790. I've yet to pull the trigger, partially because I had a poor experience many years ago with the Callaway X-14 Pro and its hot spots, but mainly because I'm a plus handicap and my stupid ego is getting in the way. I am looking forward to hitting the new P790. I doubt I'd game it, but I want to give them a shot.

    Posted:
    TaylorMade M5 8.0, Diamana Kai'li 60S, 44.75"
    TaylorMade M5 Rocket 3, Tensei Blue X, 42.5"
    TaylorMade SIM Max Rescue 19, Fujikura Atmos Blue Tour Spec 8X Hybrid
    TaylorMade P790 3, Nippon Modus 130 stiff
    TaylorMade P750 4-PW, Nippon Modus 130 stiff
    TaylorMade MG2 52, DG S400 Tour Issue
    TaylorMade Hi-Toe 58, DG S400 Tour Issue
    TaylorMade Itsy Bitsy JDay Proto, 34"
    TaylorMade TP5

    jll62's WITB
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • dpb5031dpb5031 Jupiter, FLMembers  5880WRX Points: 1,449Posts: 5,880 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #18

    Look really good...especially in the address position. My daughter plays a combo set of 770s/790s. I've hit last year's 790 model and was very impressed with flight, and especially feel considering they're a hollow bodied iron.

    Posted:
    USGA Index: ~0

    WITB:
    Ping G410 LST 9 degree - Tour AD IZ 6x
    Ping G410 LST - Fujikura Pro TourSpec 73 
    Kasco K2K 33 - Fujikura Pro TourSpec 73 
    Callaway RazrX Tour 4h - Tour 95 shaft
    Ping i200 5-UW (2 flat) - Nippon Modus 105X
    Taylormade HiToe 54 (bent to 55 & 2 flat)
    Taylormade HiToe 64 (Bent to 62 & 2 flat)
    Palmer AP30R putter (circa 1960s)
    Taylormade TP5X Ball
  • mtiger10mtiger10 Members  347WRX Points: 117Posts: 347 Greens
    Joined:  #19

    Heard so many rave reviews of the original 790 but missed out on demo days. These look so similar but TM R &D continues to improve upon the face and overall construction. The $$$$ may keep me in the standard as opposed to the titanium 790.

    Posted:

    Ben Hogan GS53 9* with UST Helium stiff or Ping G30 9* with regular flex TFC 419D
    Ben Hogan GS53 16* with UST Helium stiff
    Titleist 816 H2 21* with stiff flex Diamana S+ Blue 70
    Taylormade M CGB 4-AW with regular flex Nippon NSPRO840
    Callaway MD3 Milled Black Wide sole wedge 56*
    Odyssey Works #7 Tank Versa with Superstroke

  • Djuga06Djuga06 D.J. Members  521WRX Points: 232Handicap: 6.9Posts: 521 Golden Tee
    Joined:  #20

    On -, @jll62 said:

    On -, @EricWGolf said:

    On -, @hankmoody said:

    I remember a designer saying the goal was a 7i that launched as high as a 7, carried like a 6, and was as easy to hit as an 8.

    I would add “has a descent angle like a 7 iron.” Descent angle is arguably the most important factor when getting fit for irons. No point in having a 7 iron that flies high and carries far if you can’t stop it over a hazard onto a green with a front pin placement. If a 7 iron rolls out 30 feet past the pin because the angle of descent is too flat, then it’s not really useful as a 7 iron.

    100%. Eventually players are going to realize that the way to stop shots on the green is via descent angle, rather than spin. The OEMs already know this.

    Every year I debate switching to what I like to call "point and shoot" irons like the P790. I've yet to pull the trigger, partially because I had a poor experience many years ago with the Callaway X-14 Pro and its hot spots, but mainly because I'm a plus handicap and my stupid ego is getting in the way. I am looking forward to hitting the new P790. I doubt I'd game it, but I want to give them a shot.

    I know we’ve chatted before but I do think you get some workability with the P790, just nowhere near the amount you’d get with the 730 or 750, or the ones you’re currently gaming. For me, as my life has changed with a family now, I don’t get nearly the practice I used to, and the “point and shoot” when it needs to be works pretty well. With all the launch angle talk and them lowering the CG, I’m REALLY intrigued to try out the new UDI compared to my original. I currently use it off the tee but also it’s been a go-to second shot club into par 5’s and having a little higher launch might be right in my wheelhouse.

    Posted:
  • HappyGilmore22HappyGilmore22 Members  726WRX Points: 225Handicap: 3Posts: 726 Golden Tee
    Joined:  #21

    These really look great, just not sure they are the best option for me unfortunately. Wish they made forgiving irons like these in a P760/770 profile with more normal lofts and higher cgs. It still cracks me up any time I think of P790s I just remember being at my local gg when these came out 2 years ago and a guy asked them to bend his set 3 degrees strong. Didn't think much of it at the time until I learned about insane lofts. Now I just have to laugh so hard at that any time I see these.

    Posted:
    Titleist TS3 8.5 deg - Mitsubishi Diamana DF 70 TX
    Titleist TS3 15 deg - Project X Even Flow T1100 White 85 6.5
    Titleist 816 H2 19 deg - Mitsubishi Diamana D+ 90 X
    Titleist T200 4-5, T100 6-PW - Project X 6.5
    Titleist Vokey SM8 50.12 F, 54.14F, 58.10 S - PX 6.5
    Scotty Cameron Special Select Newport 2
  • jll62jll62 MinneapolisClubWRX  2391WRX Points: 688Handicap: +2.2Posts: 2,391 ClubWRX
    Joined:  #22

    On -, @Djuga06 said:

    I know we’ve chatted before but I do think you get some workability with the P790, just nowhere near the amount you’d get with the 730 or 750, or the ones you’re currently gaming. For me, as my life has changed with a family now, I don’t get nearly the practice I used to, and the “point and shoot” when it needs to be works pretty well. With all the launch angle talk and them lowering the CG, I’m REALLY intrigued to try out the new UDI compared to my original. I currently use it off the tee but also it’s been a go-to second shot club into par 5’s and having a little higher launch might be right in my wheelhouse.

    The thing is, I'm basically a straight ball hitter. I don't see much curve and try not to work the ball too much, so on paper I should consider something along the lines of a P790. But I have a visual thing that's hard for me to get past. When I see that much club behind the ball, it doesn't end well. Maybe someday.

    I've had the original UDI and this season the P790 UDI, but I'm definitely getting the new one. I also use it occasionally on second shots into par 5s, so I'll take a bit of higher launch if I can get it.

    Posted:
    TaylorMade M5 8.0, Diamana Kai'li 60S, 44.75"
    TaylorMade M5 Rocket 3, Tensei Blue X, 42.5"
    TaylorMade SIM Max Rescue 19, Fujikura Atmos Blue Tour Spec 8X Hybrid
    TaylorMade P790 3, Nippon Modus 130 stiff
    TaylorMade P750 4-PW, Nippon Modus 130 stiff
    TaylorMade MG2 52, DG S400 Tour Issue
    TaylorMade Hi-Toe 58, DG S400 Tour Issue
    TaylorMade Itsy Bitsy JDay Proto, 34"
    TaylorMade TP5

    jll62's WITB
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • BiggErnBiggErn Members  2897WRX Points: 772Posts: 2,897 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #23

    On -, @jll62 said:

    On -, @Djuga06 said:

    I know we’ve chatted before but I do think you get some workability with the P790, just nowhere near the amount you’d get with the 730 or 750, or the ones you’re currently gaming. For me, as my life has changed with a family now, I don’t get nearly the practice I used to, and the “point and shoot” when it needs to be works pretty well. With all the launch angle talk and them lowering the CG, I’m REALLY intrigued to try out the new UDI compared to my original. I currently use it off the tee but also it’s been a go-to second shot club into par 5’s and having a little higher launch might be right in my wheelhouse.

    The thing is, I'm basically a straight ball hitter. I don't see much curve and try not to work the ball too much, so on paper I should consider something along the lines of a P790. But I have a visual thing that's hard for me to get past. When I see that much club behind the ball, it doesn't end well. Maybe someday.

    I've had the original UDI and this season the P790 UDI, but I'm definitely getting the new one. I also use it occasionally on second shots into par 5s, so I'll take a bit of higher launch if I can get it.

    How do you hit the udi if you can’t hit the other irons?

    Posted:
  • Djuga06Djuga06 D.J. Members  521WRX Points: 232Handicap: 6.9Posts: 521 Golden Tee
    Joined:  #24

    On -, @BiggErn said:

    On -, @jll62 said:

    The thing is, I'm basically a straight ball hitter. I don't see much curve and try not to work the ball too much, so on paper I should consider something along the lines of a P790. But I have a visual thing that's hard for me to get past. When I see that much club behind the ball, it doesn't end well. Maybe someday.

    I've had the original UDI and this season the P790 UDI, but I'm definitely getting the new one. I also use it occasionally on second shots into par 5s, so I'll take a bit of higher launch if I can get it.

    How do you hit the udi if you can’t hit the other irons?

    Just a guess, but the same way that several of the staff guys hit the UDI and any one of several different player offerings for the rest of their irons?

    Posted:
  • nocarts83nocarts83 Member Members  184WRX Points: 44Handicap: 11Posts: 184 Fairways
    Joined:  #25

    On -, @EricWGolf said:

    On -, @hankmoody said:

    I remember a designer saying the goal was a 7i that launched as high as a 7, carried like a 6, and was as easy to hit as an 8.

    I would add “has a descent angle like a 7 iron.” Descent angle is arguably the most important factor when getting fit for irons. No point in having a 7 iron that flies high and carries far if you can’t stop it over a hazard onto a green with a front pin placement. If a 7 iron rolls out 30 feet past the pin because the angle of descent is too flat, then it’s not really useful as a 7 iron.

    100% agree with this, but would like to add another question. If 7 flies like a 6, there are 2 ways to get there...either the PW flies like a 9 or the gaps are slightly larger. But because of the physics reasons stated in this thread, I agree that if you deloft these to match lofts with a combo, they'll just balloon and won't perform as expected.
    I've never hit anything other than the demo 7 iron they have in stores, so I don't know how the 9 and PW perform, feel. I typically like to use my 9 and PW for chips, runners, flighted 3/4's, etc. quite a bit and like combo-ing a different smaller iron. For example, in 2014, I got 4-8 in MP54 and 9-PW in MP64.
    So with the P790's, a 7 iron carries like a 7, flies like a 6 with a loft of 30.5. The P730 6 iron has a loft of....31. Is the answer to play PW, 9, 8, 7, 7, 6, 5?

    Posted:
  • BiggErnBiggErn Members  2897WRX Points: 772Posts: 2,897 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #26

    On -, @Djuga06 said:

    On -, @BiggErn said:

    On -, @jll62 said:

    The thing is, I'm basically a straight ball hitter. I don't see much curve and try not to work the ball too much, so on paper I should consider something along the lines of a P790. But I have a visual thing that's hard for me to get past. When I see that much club behind the ball, it doesn't end well. Maybe someday.

    I've had the original UDI and this season the P790 UDI, but I'm definitely getting the new one. I also use it occasionally on second shots into par 5s, so I'll take a bit of higher launch if I can get it.

    How do you hit the udi if you can’t hit the other irons?

    Just a guess, but the same way that several of the staff guys hit the UDI and any one of several different player offerings for the rest of their irons?

    I’m sure the staff guys don’t have supposed mental issues when it comes to hitting any club especially when it’s the same size as others that are supposedly “too big”.

    Posted:
  • Djuga06Djuga06 D.J. Members  521WRX Points: 232Handicap: 6.9Posts: 521 Golden Tee
    Joined:  #27

    On -, @BiggErn said:

    On -, @Djuga06 said:

    On -, @BiggErn said:

    On -, @jll62

    I've had the original UDI and this season the P790 UDI, but I'm definitely getting the new one. I also use it occasionally on second shots into par 5s, so I'll take a bit of higher launch if I can get it.

    How do you hit the udi if you can’t hit the other irons?

    Just a guess, but the same way that several of the staff guys hit the UDI and any one of several different player offerings for the rest of their irons?

    I’m sure the staff guys don’t have supposed mental issues when it comes to hitting any club especially when it’s the same size as others that are supposedly “too big”.

    I dunno the staff guys all have mental coaches and I once watched Hidecki's rep take a black marker to his driver head bc there was too much silver at the edge of the top line to his eye. Plus it's all personal preference and

    On -, @jll62 is sub scratch.
    Posted:
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • EricWGolfEricWGolf Members  766WRX Points: 447Posts: 766 Golden Tee
    Joined:  #28

    On -, @BiggErn said:

    I’m sure the staff guys don’t have supposed mental issues when it comes to hitting any club especially when it’s the same size as others that are supposedly “too big”.

    So, you would feel comfortable hitting this iron set?:

    Because I wouldn’t, even though I carry a hybrid in my bag. Different players like seeing different profiles for clubs that serve different purposes. The UDI serves an different purpose than the P790 iron set.

    Posted:
  • jll62jll62 MinneapolisClubWRX  2391WRX Points: 688Handicap: +2.2Posts: 2,391 ClubWRX
    Joined:  #29

    On -, @BiggErn said:

    On -, @jll62 said:

    On -, @Djuga06 said:

    I know we’ve chatted before but I do think you get some workability with the P790, just nowhere near the amount you’d get with the 730 or 750, or the ones you’re currently gaming. For me, as my life has changed with a family now, I don’t get nearly the practice I used to, and the “point and shoot” when it needs to be works pretty well. With all the launch angle talk and them lowering the CG, I’m REALLY intrigued to try out the new UDI compared to my original. I currently use it off the tee but also it’s been a go-to second shot club into par 5’s and having a little higher launch might be right in my wheelhouse.

    The thing is, I'm basically a straight ball hitter. I don't see much curve and try not to work the ball too much, so on paper I should consider something along the lines of a P790. But I have a visual thing that's hard for me to get past. When I see that much club behind the ball, it doesn't end well. Maybe someday.

    I've had the original UDI and this season the P790 UDI, but I'm definitely getting the new one. I also use it occasionally on second shots into par 5s, so I'll take a bit of higher launch if I can get it.

    How do you hit the udi if you can’t hit the other irons?

    Quite honestly, not as well off the turf as I'd like. >

    On -, @BiggErn said:

    On -, @jll62 said:

    On -, @Djuga06 said:

    I know we’ve chatted before but I do think you get some workability with the P790, just nowhere near the amount you’d get with the 730 or 750, or the ones you’re currently gaming. For me, as my life has changed with a family now, I don’t get nearly the practice I used to, and the “point and shoot” when it needs to be works pretty well. With all the launch angle talk and them lowering the CG, I’m REALLY intrigued to try out the new UDI compared to my original. I currently use it off the tee but also it’s been a go-to second shot club into par 5’s and having a little higher launch might be right in my wheelhouse.

    The thing is, I'm basically a straight ball hitter. I don't see much curve and try not to work the ball too much, so on paper I should consider something along the lines of a P790. But I have a visual thing that's hard for me to get past. When I see that much club behind the ball, it doesn't end well. Maybe someday.

    I've had the original UDI and this season the P790 UDI, but I'm definitely getting the new one. I also use it occasionally on second shots into par 5s, so I'll take a bit of higher launch if I can get it.

    How do you hit the udi if you can’t hit the other irons?

    Mostly off the tee. I do play the UDI on 2nd shots into par 5s occasionally, but it primarily goes in the bag on courses where I have to hit a tee shot or two into a 235-250 area (tends to be 90% of the courses I play). I've just always had issues with long irons when they're a bit chunky with wide soles and I can see the back of the club sticking out from behind the top line at address.

    Going back to my original point, I often think the game would be easier for me if I just got rid of players irons entirely and went to something like the P790, but it hasn't been a fit. I do pretty well with what I have, so there hasn't been a large need to change.

    Posted:
    TaylorMade M5 8.0, Diamana Kai'li 60S, 44.75"
    TaylorMade M5 Rocket 3, Tensei Blue X, 42.5"
    TaylorMade SIM Max Rescue 19, Fujikura Atmos Blue Tour Spec 8X Hybrid
    TaylorMade P790 3, Nippon Modus 130 stiff
    TaylorMade P750 4-PW, Nippon Modus 130 stiff
    TaylorMade MG2 52, DG S400 Tour Issue
    TaylorMade Hi-Toe 58, DG S400 Tour Issue
    TaylorMade Itsy Bitsy JDay Proto, 34"
    TaylorMade TP5

    jll62's WITB
  • soap1984soap1984 Members  769WRX Points: 110Posts: 769 Golden Tee
    Joined:  #30

    So if they strengthen the lofts to create launch like a normally numbered club, then what exactly is the point of this club again other than to make one feel like they are hitting a 7 iron further than an old seven iron, and most likely, with far less spin?

    A guy I play with who is a good player uses these and I must say, his ball light is so much worse now it is ridiculous. Maybe he doesn't swing hard enough but he just hits low balls with no spin

    Posted:
    Ping G410- Diamana BF 
    Ping G 410 - 17 and 19 Hyrbid
    Mizuno MP20 SEL - 4-PW
    Vokey SM7 50, 54, 60
    Newport 2
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • HappyGilmore22HappyGilmore22 Members  726WRX Points: 225Handicap: 3Posts: 726 Golden Tee
    Joined:  #31

    On -, @soap1984 said:

    So if they strengthen the lofts to create launch like a normally numbered club, then what exactly is the point of this club again other than to make one feel like they are hitting a 7 iron further than an old seven iron, and most likely, with far less spin?

    A guy I play with who is a good player uses these and I must say, his ball light is so much worse now it is ridiculous. Maybe he doesn't swing hard enough but he just hits low balls with no spin

    The point is that it gives a shorter hitter a more player type profile club with more forgiveness and higher launch so that they can hit the same number club on the bottom that their playing partner or person they are watching on tv is hitting their P730/750/760. I'm a high launch high spin player so this brings it down for me to more optimal numbers but they are just too long and give crazy gaps in the short irons with the 7 iron carrying 195-200 yards, otherwise I'd like playing something this easy to hit and forgiving.

    Posted:
    Titleist TS3 8.5 deg - Mitsubishi Diamana DF 70 TX
    Titleist TS3 15 deg - Project X Even Flow T1100 White 85 6.5
    Titleist 816 H2 19 deg - Mitsubishi Diamana D+ 90 X
    Titleist T200 4-5, T100 6-PW - Project X 6.5
    Titleist Vokey SM8 50.12 F, 54.14F, 58.10 S - PX 6.5
    Scotty Cameron Special Select Newport 2
2

Leave a Comment

Rich Text Editor. To edit a paragraph's style, hit tab to get to the paragraph menu. From there you will be able to pick one style. Nothing defaults to paragraph. An inline formatting menu will show up when you select text. Hit tab to get into that menu. Some elements, such as rich link embeds, images, loading indicators, and error messages may get inserted into the editor. You may navigate to these using the arrow keys inside of the editor and delete them with the delete or backspace key.