Last year, in an effort to improve the capability of our forums, we switched to new software. We expected tremendous scalability and rapid customization that would significantly improve each Member's experience across multiple devices and integrate flawlessly with social media platforms.

Unfortunately, after a significant capital expense, we have decided that the length of time and the additional cost to reach our goals make this enterprise untenable.

Thus, we have made the difficult decision to transition the forums to our original software platform. We’re excited that, in the nearly two years since we began the process of our most recent switch, our original platform has been upgraded significantly, and we are confident that the reversion will not only provide the stability that we desperately needed prior to our last move but will also return to the Membership the high level of customization that made our online community so great. We have also added technical resources to the GolfWRX staff that will allow us to build custom modules and modifications that we are confident will take the forums to the next level.

We remain the world's largest online golf community, and we still hold true to our core values and mission statement as written in 2005. Bearing both of those elements in mind, being the best and offering our Members a platform that is world-class are both requirements, not options, and it is that spirit that has motivated this decision.

So, please pardon our mess over the next five days or so while we transition the forums.

A few important notes: Current content will be accessible during that time, but the forums will be READ ONLY, and you will not be able to start new threads or reply to posts or PM's. We know this is inconvenient, and we apologize, and we greatly appreciate GolfWRXers bearing with us through the transition.

We are very excited about starting this next chapter for GolfWRX and getting back to the high-quality Member experience we all expect as soon as possible.

Handicap to play blades?

2456711
11

Comments

  • Bad9Bad9 Members  4853WRX Points: 724Handicap: 9.2Posts: 4,853 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #32

    2hc is not near good enough to play blades. Not even close. 🙄

    Posted:
    Ping G410 Plus 10.5°/Alta CB55 r flex
    Ping G400 7w/Alta CB r flex
    Ping G400 4h/Xcaliber r flex
    Ping G400 5h/Xcaliber r flex
    Ping G400 6-U/Xcaliber r flex
    Ping Glide 2.0 ES 58°/Xcaliber r flex
    Mizuno Bettinardi C06
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • Kenny Lee PuckettKenny Lee Puckett Members  3463WRX Points: 53Posts: 3,463 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #33

    On -, @golfinguru11 said:

    I know lots of tour pros don’t play blades but all of them could without losing much ground. But for ams, at what handicap do you start losing strokes gaming blades?

    fyi-2 handicap who grew up on cbs, just now getting into blades

    Well here I think you are referring to an iron's particular benefit. I believe the % of GIR that a player hits is a good indicator of when "losing much ground" starts to occur based off the iron platform the player uses.

    Starting from a perfect 18/18 greens where does the player most consistently fall? If routinely a 6, 7, or 8 amount of GIR, that type player is high likely not to have the ball striking ideal for a blade, and GIRs could go higher with another iron choice. If the player hits an 11, 12, 13+ amount of GIR pretty regulary, than IMO they would be able hit most any iron platform they choose.

    Posted:
    [font=tahoma,geneva,sans-serif]PING G LST: Ping Tour 80
    PING Anser 4wd: Accra S380 RT
    PXG 0317: Fujikura Rombax 8D07HB
    PING i500 4 iron: D.G. 120
    PING S55 5-PW: D.G. Tour Issue
    PING Glide 2.0 50/54/58: D.G. Tour Issue
    PING Darby F Ti Pixel: SS 2.0 Mid
    PING: Sensor Glove, Ping 703 Cord grips
    PING: Hoofer Bag
    TaylorMade: TP5 & TP5x ball

    WITB photos: [/font]http://www.golfwrx.c...uckett-witb-19/
  • Fairway14Fairway14 Members  377WRX Points: 133Posts: 377 Greens
    Joined:  #34

    On -, @Kenny Lee Puckett said:

    Starting from a perfect 18/18 greens where does the player most consistently fall? If routinely a 6, 7, or 8 amount of GIR, that type player is high likely not to have the ball striking ideal for a blade, and GIRs could go higher with another iron choice. If the player hits an 11, 12, 13+ amount of GIR pretty regulary, than IMO they would be able hit most any iron platform they choose.

    Maybe some players will strike more square shots (and hit more greens) with a smaller blade style iron than they would a larger head cavity back iron ? I

    Posted:
  • Colonel_SteelheadColonel_Steelhead OMembers  924WRX Points: 121Handicap: 2HiPosts: 924 Golden Tee
    Joined:  #35

    On -, @balls_deep said:

    On -, @iceman1118 said:

    No handicap is necessary. How often do you strike the ball well? Here is a perfect example of this nonsense; last week I was out with my neighbor, former Euro Tour Pro, who has a set of MP-4 blades with PX 6.0 shafts. I game the 2019 P790s with C Taper 130 X. He is a 0 handicap (he does not play too much anymore, otherwise he would easily be a +3 or +4), I am a 7. We were standing on a par 3, 155 yards. I hit my 9 iron pin high, decent strike. I picked up his 9 iron "for science" and had same strike and divot and landed 2 yards short of my first shot. It's a mental thing in my opinion. Can I play blades regularly, absolutely. Do I have to? No. A super game improvement iron will not make you magically hit the ball straight. A blade will not make you chunk every shot. It's perception, plain and simple. No matter what club you are holding from driver to putter, you need to put a good swing on the ball. My two cents.

    IMO even a 20 could be fine playing a 9 iron blade. Playing a 210 par 3 over water from the tips you'd notice a difference between the MP4 4 iron and your own.

    That said, granted you have the speed to get the launch conditions right for blades the biggest considerations in my testing have been

    1. Sole grind - a sharper grind like Mizuno MP is less forgiving if you come into the ball even the slightest bit early
    2. Shaft - this is a huge consideration with any club but IMO makes a bigger difference with blades
    3. CG - if you find one that suits your contact and delivery it can work as well as a CB

    For me, granted the shaft is right, I have no issue hitting blades but I have the speed and contact to do so. I know golfers who are much better than I am as a whole who do much better with CBs.

    Well I'm pulling 5 wood for the 210 over water because I want it to get there first and foremost, if no wind. Into wind maybe 3 wood, maybe driver, depends on the wind. Left to right wind, well I tend to pull the 5 wood a little left off a tee, but push the 3 wood a little so theres that. If I overspin the 5 wood theres a good chance I'll be short, again, no wind, but if theres wind and I overspin it then Im definitely short. **** theres more to this game than I thought..................... :)

    Posted:
    Ping G400 10.5,3W,5W (Eye 2 1,3,5)
    Ping Eye 2+no+ 3-SW, BeCu+ LW
    Ping 30th Anniversary Anser, Pat Pend. Anser 2
    Titleist Pro V1
  • BunkerSnotBunkerSnot Gonzo Golfer Eugene, ORMembers  108WRX Points: 70Handicap: 20Posts: 108 Fairways
    Joined:  #36

    Club choice shouldn't be based on handicap, it's what provides consistent yardage, direction etc, feels good to you, looks good to you and makes it so you want to get and play.

    Posted:
  • Sean2Sean2 Members  32920WRX Points: 3,500Posts: 32,920 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #37

    I don't think there are any "shoulds" or "supposed to's" in recreational golf. Play what you like, what gives you the most enjoyment.

    Posted:

    Treat yourself as if you were someone you are responsible for helping. Jordan Peterson

    Too much sanity may be madness and the maddest thing of all is to see life as it is, and not as it should be. Cervantes

    In golf, the human mind has much higher capabilities to screw things up than the physics has to make things better. Unknown

     

  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • glmglm Members  256WRX Points: 68Handicap: 5Posts: 256 Greens
    Joined:  #38

    I love reading the blade threads, keep them coming.

    Posted:
  • wely324wely324 Members  352WRX Points: 160Posts: 352 Greens
    Joined:  #39

    Launch a 3 iron blade high enough to drop and stop the ball within 5-10 feet of the ball mark and your good to go.

    Posted:
  • Kenny Lee PuckettKenny Lee Puckett Members  3463WRX Points: 53Posts: 3,463 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #40

    On -, @Fairway14 said:

    On -, @Kenny Lee Puckett said:

    Starting from a perfect 18/18 greens where does the player most consistently fall? If routinely a 6, 7, or 8 amount of GIR, that type player is high likely not to have the ball striking ideal for a blade, and GIRs could go higher with another iron choice. If the player hits an 11, 12, 13+ amount of GIR pretty regulary, than IMO they would be able hit most any iron platform they choose.

    Maybe some players will strike more square shots (and hit more greens) with a smaller blade style iron than they would a larger head cavity back iron ? I

    sure, if they are capable of hitting 11, 12, 13 or more GIR on average. I've never been inspired to give a player who hits 5 greens a round a set of traditional blades. never.

    Posted:
    [font=tahoma,geneva,sans-serif]PING G LST: Ping Tour 80
    PING Anser 4wd: Accra S380 RT
    PXG 0317: Fujikura Rombax 8D07HB
    PING i500 4 iron: D.G. 120
    PING S55 5-PW: D.G. Tour Issue
    PING Glide 2.0 50/54/58: D.G. Tour Issue
    PING Darby F Ti Pixel: SS 2.0 Mid
    PING: Sensor Glove, Ping 703 Cord grips
    PING: Hoofer Bag
    TaylorMade: TP5 & TP5x ball

    WITB photos: [/font]http://www.golfwrx.c...uckett-witb-19/
  • Sweden_WilliamSweden_William Members  30WRX Points: 47Handicap: 2.0Posts: 30 Bunkers
    Joined:  #41

    I think for most decent golfers, they can play blades effectively up through 6 iron.
    The 5 iron spot is where you need to have the swing speed to elevate the shot decently.
    As far as ball striking, I don't think it matters. Most mid to higher cappers that I see playing SGI clubs, can't hit the broad side of a barn anyway. Might as well play blades and sharpen up the game.

    Posted:

    Driver: Ping G25
    4 & 7 wood: Ping G25
    23° hybrid: Ping G25
    5i - pw: Mizuno MP64
    50.12° (bent to 49°) / 54.14° / 58.09° wedges: Vokey SM4
    Putter: Ping Redwood Anser

  • ian-500ian-500 Members  1086WRX Points: 292Handicap: 12Posts: 1,086 Platinum Tees
    Joined:  #42

    Any handicap. Just play them and don't worry about what anyone says to your face or on the tinterweb. Blades are great, superb, wonderful infact. I'm off 12 and play them. I've played them off 20 and 16. The only thing you have to get over will be your ego, when you mate hits his 7i and you have to take your 6i (usual loft differences). Other than that, go for it.

    Posted:
    DR: Callaway Rogue SZ 9° + Diamana W60x.
    FW: in the making.
    HY: Callaway Apex19 4h 23° + Tour AD IZ 95x.
    Irons: Taylormade R9 Forged 5i-PW + Quadra 100i Pro x.
    Wedges: iCleveland RTX3 52/58
    SeeMore SB1, Accra FX300.
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • Fairway14Fairway14 Members  377WRX Points: 133Posts: 377 Greens
    Joined:  #43

    On -, @Kenny Lee Puckett said:

    On -, @Fairway14 said:

    On -, @Kenny Lee Puckett said:

    Starting from a perfect 18/18 greens where does the player most consistently fall? If routinely a 6, 7, or 8 amount of GIR, that type player is high likely not to have the ball striking ideal for a blade, and GIRs could go higher with another iron choice. If the player hits an 11, 12, 13+ amount of GIR pretty regulary, than IMO they would be able hit most any iron platform they choose.

    Maybe some players will strike more square shots (and hit more greens) with a smaller blade style iron than they would a larger head cavity back iron ? I

    sure, if they are capable of hitting 11, 12, 13 or more GIR on average. I've never been inspired to give a player who hits 5 greens a round a set of traditional blades. never.

    If your assumption is that beginners and, or, high handicap players will strike better shots with relatively large cavity back irons than they would traditional size small headed blade style irons, then I disagree.
    Specifically, it would not surprise me if some beginner or high handicap players were able to square a relatively small size iron head more consistently (than a large iron head) and consequently hit more greens.
    My guess is that if you had 20 high handicap players play a dozen rounds with each type/style iron, 50% of the players would hit more greens with blades and 50% would hit more greens with large cavity back irons.

    Posted:
  • OldCussOldCuss South CarolinaMembers  76WRX Points: 110Handicap: Which One?Posts: 76 Fairways
    Joined:  #44

    I like me some Honda. Mostly now the Civics. All of 'em had a clutch; liked them all. If I buy another, Civic or otherwise, it's going to be an automatic. Clutch is OK - has its utility - but too much work for what I want to do now.

    Old Cuss

    Posted:

    Norm OldCuss Bryan

  • jimbjimb Members  1836WRX Points: 155Posts: 1,836 Platinum Tees
    Joined:  #45

    Look at your current irons. Start with the short irons and work your way up to the mid irons. Are the ball marks for your strikes in the center? If they are you can probably play them. If you tend to hit the ball toward the toe or thinnish, then don't think about buying a set. I tried the the Apex MB irons after playing the 2013 X-Forged for a long time. I was about a half a club shorter with them. Went to the Apex Pro 19 irons and I am happy.

    Posted:
  • chch3chch3 Members  842WRX Points: 110Posts: 842 Golden Tee
    Joined:  #46

    Your ability to play blades has a direct correlation to your ball striking ability.
    Your handicap does not always have a direct correlation to your ball striking ability.
    Player A who is a 14 HDCP could play blades because he is a consistent ball striker and Player B who is a 14 HDCP shouldn't touch a blade because his iron play is his weakness. It just all depends on your ball striking ability.

    Posted:
    Cobra Bio Cell 9.5// HZRDUS Black
    Cobra F6 Baffler 17.5 // HZRDUS Black
    Cobra F7 Hybrid 20.5// ATMOS Tour Spec Blue
    Mizuno JPX 900 Forged 5-GW // Project X
    Taylormade Mill Grind 52 // Nippon 120
    Taylormade Mill Grind 58 // Nippon 120
    Taylormade Tour Spider Black
  • PepperturboPepperturbo Midwest and SouthwestMembers  16996WRX Points: 1,082Handicap: 4-5Posts: 16,996 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #47

    Nobody that I know that plays blades gives a squat what someone's club dejour is. I repeat, there is NO handicap requirement. Just the right attitude, that is, not give a squat what others think about your choices in life. I am proud to know a 79 year old man that is an 18-20 handicap, and for the last fifty years has played blades and now plays the senior tee's. He's happy, that's all that matters.

    Posted:
    Titleist TS2 9.5, Ventus 5 "S"
    Titleist TS2 16.5*, Ventus 7 "S"
    Titleist 718 T-MB 17* 2i, Steelfiber i95cw "S"
    Titleist 620 3i i95cw "S"
    Titleist 620 4i-PW, Steelfiber i110 "S"
    SM6 F-52/8, Steelfiber i125 "S"
    SM6 M-58/8, DG-S200
    SC California Monterey
    ProV1 & AVX





  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • herbert7890herbert7890 San AntonioMembers  365WRX Points: 239Handicap: 2.4Posts: 365 Greens
    Joined:  #48

    On -, @Pepperturbo said:

    Nobody that I know that plays blades gives a squat what someone's club dejour is. I repeat, there is NO handicap requirement. Just the right attitude, that is, not give a squat what others think about your choices in life. I am proud to know a 79 year old man that is an 18-20 handicap, and for the last fifty years has played blades and now plays the senior tee's. He's happy, that's all that matters.

    This^^^^^^

    Posted:

    TaylorMade SIM Driver (set to 7.5 Degrees)
    Callaway Epic Flash Sub Zero 3-Wood
    Mizuno MP-20 SEL Irons
    Callaway MD5 Jaws 50 Degrees
    Vokey Custom SM8 (56 and 60)
    Scotty Cameron Special Select 2020 Newport 2

  • aquapigaquapig Members  560WRX Points: 239Handicap: 4.9Posts: 560 Golden Tee
    Joined:  #49

    On -, @chippa13 said:

    On -, @aquapig said:

    On -, @tets said:

    ANY handicap... try this, go over your last round. Take your score, subtract all the putts you hit, then subtract any wedges include chip shots, bunker shots etc, next take away 18 tee shots ( if there are 4 par 3’s you can choose not to subtract them if you want) .. your “ other” shots will be somewhere around 10, plus or minus a few. You may also choose to subtract hybrids and fairway woods if you want. My point is play what irons you want, you probably use them less than you think.

    Great post.

    I'm playing to about a 6 right now. The reason I don't shoot par is I'm a terrible chipper and I have a drive a round that leads to a double bogey.

    I've played MP 30s, JPX 900 F and now MP 57s. My scores haven't changed much. I'd say the least "forgiving" were the MP30s and those are the only sticks I've broken par with.

    Funny how people always blame terrible chipping rather than inaccurate irons.

    Even tour pros miss GIR. The difference is when I miss a green, I'm probably going to drop a stroke or two because my chipping is really bad. A tour pro is trying to chip in and usually save par.

    Posted:
  • chippa13chippa13 Members  2697WRX Points: 451Posts: 2,697 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #50

    On -, @Pepperturbo said:

    Nobody that I know that plays blades gives a squat what someone's club dejour is. I repeat, there is NO handicap requirement. Just the right attitude, that is, not give a squat what others think about your choices in life. I am proud to know a 79 year old man that is an 18-20 handicap, and for the last fifty years has played blades and now plays the senior tee's. He's happy, that's all that matters.

    Nobody I know that plays any style of clubs gives a squat what someone's club du jour is. This site is the only place I have ever seen anyone care who plays what.

    Posted:
  • TigerInTheWoodsTigerInTheWoods Members  2718WRX Points: 1,757Handicap: 3Posts: 2,718 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #51

    On -, @Fairway14 said:

    On -, @Kenny Lee Puckett said:

    On -, @Fairway14 said:

    On -, @Kenny Lee Puckett said:

    Starting from a perfect 18/18 greens where does the player most consistently fall? If routinely a 6, 7, or 8 amount of GIR, that type player is high likely not to have the ball striking ideal for a blade, and GIRs could go higher with another iron choice. If the player hits an 11, 12, 13+ amount of GIR pretty regulary, than IMO they would be able hit most any iron platform they choose.

    Maybe some players will strike more square shots (and hit more greens) with a smaller blade style iron than they would a larger head cavity back iron ? I

    sure, if they are capable of hitting 11, 12, 13 or more GIR on average. I've never been inspired to give a player who hits 5 greens a round a set of traditional blades. never.

    If your assumption is that beginners and, or, high handicap players will strike better shots with relatively large cavity back irons than they would traditional size small headed blade style irons, then I disagree.
    Specifically, it would not surprise me if some beginner or high handicap players were able to square a relatively small size iron head more consistently (than a large iron head) and consequently hit more greens.
    My guess is that if you had 20 high handicap players play a dozen rounds with each type/style iron, 50% of the players would hit more greens with blades and 50% would hit more greens with large cavity back irons.

    I very much doubt that 50% of the 20hc would hit more greens with blades. Most guys on here could probably get around the course fine with blades because they spend time on golf forums, buy/sell, think about the game, think about their swing, and try to improve. Most hacks I see on a weekend are abysmal at getting the ball in the air with a low CG shovel and would struggle even worse with blades. If you're not shotmaking there is not point in playing them other than vanity IMO.

    Posted:

    ▪️ Ping G410 LST 9* PX Hzrdus Yellow 63g 6.5X

    ▪️ Taylormade Sim Max 15* Aldila Rogue 70x

    ▪️ Titleist 818 H1 @18* PX Hzrdus HC Black 85g

    ▪️ Miura CB-57 4-7, Miura MB-001 8-PW Dynamic Gold Tour Issue X100

    ▪️ Vokey Forged 52F 56M | Vokey TVD 56M 58K 60K | Taylormade Hi-Toe 60ATV | Dynamic Gold Tour Issue S400 (Change based on bag and course)

    ▪️ Byron Morgan DH89 34.75" Custom

    ▪️ Titleist Pro V1X | Srixon Z-Star XV | Taylormade TP5X

    ▪️ Ping Hoofer

  • driveandputtmachinedriveandputtmachine 4 wedges or 2 iron? That is the question! Members  1569WRX Points: 346Handicap: 0.0Posts: 1,569 Platinum Tees
    Joined:  #52

    Someone who hits the center mostly with iron shots. I am a 2 and won’t touch blades. I have a buddy that is a 7 that will only play blades. He drives it like a 12 handicapper, putts like a 15, but hits irons like he is a scratch golfer or better. Handicap has little to no bearing on who should play blades.

    Posted:
    Driver - Ping G400 Max on Tour 75 shaft
    Fairway - TM M5 on Project X HZRDOUS Yellow
    Hybrid - Ping G400 on Tour shaft
    Irons - (5) Cobra Speed Zone on Project X Catalyst 100
    Irons - (6) Srixon 565 on Recoil 110
    Irons (7-W) Srixon 765 on Recoil 110
    Wedges - Cleveland CB2 50* and 54*, Cleveland RTX 4 58* and 62* all on UST Recoil 110
    Putter - Mannkrafted MA/66 or Taylor Made Spider Tour
    Ball - Srixon Z Star or Z Star XV
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • Muirfield WillieMuirfield Willie Members  453WRX Points: 131Posts: 453 Greens
    Joined:  #53

    Ah yes, the weekly almost daily, blades thread. Well this weeks question is "Handicap to play blades". Well I've never met a handicapped person that played blades. So no, you don't need to be handicapped to play blades.

    Posted:
    Nike VR Pro Limited 9.5* 44 1/2" Kai'li 70X
    Nike VR Pro Limited 15* 42 1/2", 19* 41 3/4" Kai'li 80X
    Nike VR TW 2-PW X100, 56*,60* S400
    Titleist Scotty Cameron Pro Platinum Newport 2 35"
    MacGregor Muirfield 20th 1w,3w,5w X200, 1-SW S500, Muirfield Putter 34"
     


  • GolfjackGolfjack All about the rotation Members  1628WRX Points: 506Posts: 1,628 Platinum Tees
    Joined:  #54

    I still haven't seen any studies on how many strokes you actually lose when you play a blade versus a GI club.

    Posted:
    Callaway Epic SZ Driver 9
    TM Aeroburner TP 3 wood
    3H (19), 4H (22) Aeroburner TP
    Mizuno MP-15 5 iron, Project X LZ 6.5
    Mizuno MP-5 6-PW, Project X LZ 6.5
    Wedges Mizuno T7 50, 56, 60
    Scotty Phantom X6 STR
  • driveandputtmachinedriveandputtmachine 4 wedges or 2 iron? That is the question! Members  1569WRX Points: 346Handicap: 0.0Posts: 1,569 Platinum Tees
    Joined:  edited Oct 31, 2019 #55

    On -, @Golfjack said:

    I still haven't seen any studies on how many strokes you actually lose when you play a blade versus a GI club.

    There really isn't a good reason for a company to do it, because golfers are all so different. Even same handicap golfers are very different. It is gonna be applicable to very few people, unless they have an army of golfers trying it.

    I know a bunch 2 handicappers that I play a bunch with. None of them get to that 2 handicap in the same way, one is a great putter, but relatively short and not a great iron player. He gets up and down from anywhere. Another is one of the best iron players I have ever seen, but he only hits 9 to 10 greens per round, because he can't keep his tee balls out of the trees on the regular. The third drives the ball like he's on tour, putts like he's on tour but is not a good iron player. The last is a great all around ball striker but a horrible putter, but relatively does not put a ton of spin on the ball. Using any of those wouldn't help me determine how many strokes I may lose playing blades. I spin almost every club I hit too much, I drive it ok (relatively long) and I hit my irons ok(above average short iron, below average mid, and slightly above long iron), but I am an above average putter in the 10-30 foot range and probably below average inside of 10 feet and outside of 30 feet.

    Handicap is your ten best scores in relation to course rating from your last 20. The guy that gets up and down from everywhere it wouldn't change his score much, if at all, because one more missed green to him really won't hurt his handicap. The second guy hits his irons great and is almost always pin high (he hits it solid but with open and closed clubface) so it really wouldn't affect him much. The third it would hurt because he is already mishitting a fair amount of iron shots and getting away with it somewhat still being close to the green, he would be further away now and less chance of getting up and down. The fourth would probably be hurt as well, because he may miss an extra green a round and would definitely have some longer putts, which as a bad putter could easily lead to him 3 jacking more often.

    If someone will pay me to do this study and give me the clubs I will do it It might be applicable to maybe 10% of the population with a handicap of 7 or below, but probably even less.

    Posted:
    Driver - Ping G400 Max on Tour 75 shaft
    Fairway - TM M5 on Project X HZRDOUS Yellow
    Hybrid - Ping G400 on Tour shaft
    Irons - (5) Cobra Speed Zone on Project X Catalyst 100
    Irons - (6) Srixon 565 on Recoil 110
    Irons (7-W) Srixon 765 on Recoil 110
    Wedges - Cleveland CB2 50* and 54*, Cleveland RTX 4 58* and 62* all on UST Recoil 110
    Putter - Mannkrafted MA/66 or Taylor Made Spider Tour
    Ball - Srixon Z Star or Z Star XV
  • MtlJeffMtlJeff MontrealMembers  29953WRX Points: 3,000Handicap: 0.0Posts: 29,953 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #56

    On -, @Golfjack said:

    I still haven't seen any studies on how many strokes you actually lose when you play a blade versus a GI club.

    There's not really any good reason to do one, and studies cost money

    Posted:
    Callaway Mavrik Max 9 w/Hzrdus Smoke Black 80
    Callaway Epic Subzero 14 w/ Matrix Black Tie 80
    Ping G400 Crossover 20 w/ KBS Tour Prototype 85
    Ping G410 4-SW w/S300
    Ping Glide 3.0 Eye2 60 w/S300
    Odyssey Oworks Red Tank #7
  • Fairway14Fairway14 Members  377WRX Points: 133Posts: 377 Greens
    Joined:  #57

    On -, @Golfjack said:

    I still haven't seen any studies on how many strokes you actually lose when you play a blade versus a GI club.

    In recent years I've played rounds of golf with Mizuno MP 4's (blade) and Ping G700 (over size cavity back). Scoring average the same with either set.

    Posted:
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • Fairway14Fairway14 Members  377WRX Points: 133Posts: 377 Greens
    Joined:  #58

    On -, @MtlJeff said:

    On -, @Golfjack said:

    I still haven't seen any studies on how many strokes you actually lose when you play a blade versus a GI club.

    There's not really any good reason to do one, and studies cost money

    I suppose if a company wanted to sell traditional head size irons they could do a study and prove much of the claims about over size irons are false.

    Posted:
  • MtlJeffMtlJeff MontrealMembers  29953WRX Points: 3,000Handicap: 0.0Posts: 29,953 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #59

    On -, @Fairway14 said:

    On -, @MtlJeff said:

    On -, @Golfjack said:

    I still haven't seen any studies on how many strokes you actually lose when you play a blade versus a GI club.

    There's not really any good reason to do one, and studies cost money

    I suppose if a company wanted to sell traditional head size irons they could do a study and prove much of the claims about over size irons are false.

    That company I suppose though would have to only sell traditional style heads, or they would also be cutting the legs off their GI offerings.

    And if they didn't sell GI , I suppose they'd just get accused of manipulating the tests to favor their own offering. Like cigarette companies funding studies that say cigarettes are healthy lol

    Posted:
    Callaway Mavrik Max 9 w/Hzrdus Smoke Black 80
    Callaway Epic Subzero 14 w/ Matrix Black Tie 80
    Ping G400 Crossover 20 w/ KBS Tour Prototype 85
    Ping G410 4-SW w/S300
    Ping Glide 3.0 Eye2 60 w/S300
    Odyssey Oworks Red Tank #7
  • GoGoErkyGoGoErky Members  2874WRX Points: 1,019Posts: 2,874 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #60

    On -, @Fairway14 said:

    On -, @MtlJeff said:

    On -, @Golfjack said:

    I still haven't seen any studies on how many strokes you actually lose when you play a blade versus a GI club.

    There's not really any good reason to do one, and studies cost money

    I suppose if a company wanted to sell traditional head size irons they could do a study and prove much of the claims about over size irons are false.

    Traditional as in post 1997 or any of the sizes pre 1997?

    Posted:
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

    Advertisement
  • Nard_SNard_S Members  3954WRX Points: 907Handicap: 9Posts: 3,954 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #61

    On -, @Fairway14 said:

    On -, @MtlJeff said:

    On -, @Golfjack said:

    I still haven't seen any studies on how many strokes you actually lose when you play a blade versus a GI club.

    There's not really any good reason to do one, and studies cost money

    I suppose if a company wanted to sell traditional head size irons they could do a study and prove much of the claims about over size irons are false.

    Well, Ping went small on the Blue Print because they found in their testing, smaller worked better. Quite astonishing since they are the paternal father of almost all GI in iron design.

    Posted:
11

Leave a Comment

Rich Text Editor. To edit a paragraph's style, hit tab to get to the paragraph menu. From there you will be able to pick one style. Nothing defaults to paragraph. An inline formatting menu will show up when you select text. Hit tab to get into that menu. Some elements, such as rich link embeds, images, loading indicators, and error messages may get inserted into the editor. You may navigate to these using the arrow keys inside of the editor and delete them with the delete or backspace key.