New and Improved Shaft Chart

smoky25smoky25 Members Posts: 1,029 ✭✭
from Howard Jones
Howard Jones asked me to help him post his new and improved shaft chart. Enjoy. Click the chart to enlarge.
«13456728

Comments

  • nparknpark You're Welcome Members Posts: 685
    edited Jul 18, 2011 #2
    wow, I feel like I should buy you and Howard a beer for this image/drinks.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':drinks:' />











    Thanks
  • smoky25smoky25 Members Posts: 1,029 ✭✭
    Howard did all the work. I'm just the messenger. But since you're offering, I'll take a Bud Lite.
  • Aces-6Aces-6 Marshals, BST Volunteer Mods Posts: 3,030
    We really need to have this pinned!!
    PXG 0811X 9* Tour AD GP 7s
    PXG 0341 15* Tour AD GT 8s
    PXG 0317 19* Tensei Pro Blue 80s
    PXG 0311XF 4 Steelfiber i110s
    PXG 0311 5-GW Steelfiber i110s
    PXG 0311 54/60 Steelfiber i110s
    PXG Dagger 34"
    TM TP 5x
  • smoky25smoky25 Members Posts: 1,029 ✭✭
    We really need to have this pinned!!




    ++++1
  • minhjnminhjn Members Posts: 3,198
    Howard Jones is a gentleman and a scholar
  • OIBriEnOIBriEn Members Posts: 35
    smoky25 wrote:


    Howard did all the work. I'm just the messenger. But since you're offering, I'll take a Bud Lite.




    +1 on the BL
  • mesegrnmesegrn mesegrn Members Posts: 1,138 ✭✭
    Thanks very much!!!
  • DynoDyno Charter Members Posts: 1,902
    Nice chart...more accurate than most if not all!
  • corkycorky Members Posts: 2,858
    didn't like his last album though...." back in the eighties
  • PKMillerJrPKMillerJr Members Posts: 841
    smoky25 wrote:


    Howard Jones asked me to help him post his new and improved shaft chart. Enjoy. Click the chart to enlarge.




    I do not understand what the difference is in the DGX100's that you have different frequency listings.
  • mbbrewermbbrewer Members Posts: 971 ✭✭
    PKMillerJr wrote:

    smoky25 wrote:


    Howard Jones asked me to help him post his new and improved shaft chart. Enjoy. Click the chart to enlarge.




    I do not understand what the difference is in the DGX100's that you have different frequency listings.


    Shows the difference between soft-stepping and hard-stepping.
  • Howard JonesHoward Jones Members Posts: 8,558 ✭✭
    edited Jul 20, 2011 #13
    mbbrewer is right, it show different options for install, and what FCM values those gives.



    X-100 strait in, will be 6.8, and so is KBS Tour S Hard stepped 1x (hs)

    X-100 soft stepped once (ss) is 6.5, and so is PX 6.0 strait in, and KBS Tour S+ strait in, and C Taper stiff hard stepped once,

    X-100 soft stepped twice (ssx2) is 6.2 , so is PX 6.5 Soft stepped 2x (ssx2), so is KBS C Taper stiff strait in, and so is KBS Tour S+ soft stepped 1x (ss)



    You will also find the weight uncut for the shaft as Taper tip



    If fitting shows that a certain cpm value will fit a specific player, 1 cpm up or down does not matter, so if target cpm is 6.8 like x-100 strait in, you have this options on THIS chart.



    132 Gram - Tour X 7 ssx2 = 6.9 FCM

    130 Gram - PX 7.0 SSx2 = 6.7 FCM

    130 Gram - KBS Tour X = 6.7 FCM

    130 Gram - X-100 = 6.8 FCM

    125 Gram - KBS c-Taper S+ = 6.7 FCM

    125 Gram - KBS Tour HS = 6.8 FCM

    120 Gram - PX 6.0 Hs = 6.9 FCM

    108 Gram - X-100 Super Light = 6.8



    This chart DOES NOT say that this shafts will feel the same, or perform as the same.

    Its only a chart to fit the need for e certain Cpm strength due to club speed and parameters from the players swing who adjust from club speed.
  • kylevankylevan Members Posts: 106 ✭✭
    Very helpful...Should be pinned, can save lots of time/searches...Thanks!
  • AsleepAsleep Marshals Posts: 9,056 mod
    Chart says soft-stepping Project X is the equivalent of one full flex.
    [font=helvetica, arial, sans-serif]Treating others the way you want to be treated is the key component to preservation of our goals.[/font]
  • PKMillerJrPKMillerJr Members Posts: 841
    mbbrewer wrote:

    PKMillerJr wrote:

    smoky25 wrote:


    Howard Jones asked me to help him post his new and improved shaft chart. Enjoy. Click the chart to enlarge.




    I do not understand what the difference is in the DGX100's that you have different frequency listings.


    Shows the difference between soft-stepping and hard-stepping.




    Thanks!
  • TCNorthstarsTCNorthstars Members Posts: 171
    Any idea where black gold regular flex would fit on that chart?
  • tElihutElihu Members Posts: 1,131
    Excellent info!!!



    It does raise the question as to what size of a frequency window most players have (or can tell a difference with). I'm wondering if I'll notice a difference if I change my FCM about, say, .2 FCM. Or do I need to make a more drastic change to see a difference.
  • oldhamer25oldhamer25 Members Posts: 1,380 ✭✭
    Great information and agree with others this should be pinned so it is easier to find.
    917 D3 8.5 Xphlexx Agera Orange RF Proto
    SLDR Mini 12 Evo Speeder TS 757x
    SLDR Mini 15.8 Rogue Black 110 80TX
    716 T-MB 3 PX 6.0
    Srixon 765 4-6 PX LZ 6.0
    Srixon 965 7-PW PX LZ 6.0
    Mizuno T7 50 PX LZ 6.0
    Vokey TVD 54V & 58V
    Bettinardi Studio Stock 14
  • gqjeffgqjeff Members Posts: 1,614 ✭✭
    playing 7.5 FCM on my x7's. Played a buddies a few weeks back and he was HS x7 and they still felt amazing..
  • knickerbockerknickerbocker Pipe Dreamer Members Posts: 3,337 ✭✭
    This is very helpful, but I also think it ignores that some of these shafts are stiffer in different sections of the shaft which makes them play differently. I personally feel DGS300 Taper Tip plays stiffer than PX5.5 - this chart would say the opposite.
    9* G LST w/ Aldila Rogue Silver i/o 60
    14* Callaway XR Pro w/ Aldila Rogue Silver 70
    20* Callaway XR Pro Hybrid
    Taylormade p790 4 - GW with Modus Tour 120
    Taylormade Milled Grind Antique Bronze 54 and 58 with Modus Tour 120
    Putter: Scotty Cameron GOLO3
    WITB Link
  • thedillzthedillz Members Posts: 281
    Great info. Thanks for your work!
  • Howard JonesHoward Jones Members Posts: 8,558 ✭✭
    edited Jul 20, 2011 #23


    This is very helpful, but I also think it ignores that some of these shafts are stiffer in different sections of the shaft which makes them play differently. I personally feel DGS300 Taper Tip plays stiffer than PX5.5 - this chart would say the opposite.




    I'm afraid you misunderstand the purpose of the chart.Its got nothing to do with feel or ball curves, or spin and launch values for that matter.



    A certain club speed makes a need for a specific over all flex, but this value is changes by the amount of cpm's necessary due to the players way to swing his clubs.

    I'm using high speed camera, and playback to see what happens during transition, swing time, downswing, and release of the club. The players weight and strength, and preference for feel (soft or stiff) is also parameters for correction. The sum you end up with is used to identify shaft who meets this needs.



    Then you have to go to real life testing, and try the combo Head/Shaft, and measure with a trackman to see if you got where you wanted to, and also take the players feedback for feel and wish for ball curve into consideration. The chart is just for navigating in flex and shaft weight, but nothing of the other parameters needed to find the right shaft.
  • gqjeffgqjeff Members Posts: 1,614 ✭✭
    lucky guys in Europe getting fit by you Mr Jones..
  • Howard JonesHoward Jones Members Posts: 8,558 ✭✭
    tElihu wrote:


    Excellent info!!!



    It does raise the question as to what size of a frequency window most players have (or can tell a difference with). I'm wondering if I'll notice a difference if I change my FCM about, say, .2 FCM. Or do I need to make a more drastic change to see a difference.




    If you can feel the difference between a set strait in, VS soft stepped once or hard stepped once, you can feel the difference made from 3 or 4 cpm's

    But like i posted in another answer, this chart is NOT for comparing feel of flex.

    - Its for comparing actual over all flex, but feel both might be and will be different because this shafts is made with different bend points , there are stepped and non stepped shafts, and so on.

    Ball curves and spin values will also be different, so its only to meet the need for a certain over all flex and weight it can be used.
  • tElihutElihu Members Posts: 1,131
    Thanks for the reply and the data.



    My question was a selfish one in that I"m currently using X100s and am considering soft-stepping them.
  • Howard JonesHoward Jones Members Posts: 8,558 ✭✭
    edited Jul 21, 2011 #27
    tElihu wrote:


    Thanks for the reply and the data.



    My question was a selfish one in that I"m currently using X100s and am considering soft-stepping them.




    If you change frequency on the same shaft by tip trim, softstepping, hardstepping or swingweight change,(not the grip trick as swingweight change)

    a change of 1 cpm gives a change of 1 us feet on apex

    Sofstepping once (Dynamic Gold), reduces cpm by 3, so you should get 1 yard higher apex.
  • Tbone1976Tbone1976 Members Posts: 144
    edited Jul 21, 2011 #28
    Howard,



    I currently play the PX 5.5 straight in. Although I enjoy them, I am wondering if my ball flight is creeping up on the "high" side. Having said that, your chart shows the C-Taper R+ straight in at a FCM of 5.7. Could this .2 difference with equal shaft weight and a little different shaft design characteristics give me just that little bit of lower flight?



    Thanks
  • nparknpark You're Welcome Members Posts: 685
    Wow, I have never heard it broken down that much; 1 foot higher/lower per CPM change given the same shaft. Simply amazing info, wish I had the $$$ to go to Europe to get properly fit...oh yeah and play some of those wonderful courses. :-)
  • ucdan5ucdan5 Members Posts: 718 ✭✭
    As someone else mentioned, where would TT Black Golds fall on this chart? I have a set of Regular Flex since I hear they play 1/2 flex stiffer and considering Hard Stepping them to play closer to Stiff but a little below. Thanks in advance and great job on the chart! I see 972 posts a day asking about it, and I was one of them.
    Nike Str8t Fit w/ Accra Dymatch 2.0 MT60
    TEE CB4 15* Fujikura Rombax 7V05
    TEE CB4 19* Matrix Studio 94
    Adams CMB w/ Recoil Prototypes 110 F4 4-GW
    Miura 1957 55C Modus3 Tour 120
    Fourteen MT28V5 60* Modus3 Tour 120
    <a href="Machine M2A Converter" title="WITB Link" target="_blank">WITB Link</a>
  • 3step3step Members Posts: 693



    This is very helpful, but I also think it ignores that some of these shafts are stiffer in different sections of the shaft which makes them play differently. I personally feel DGS300 Taper Tip plays stiffer than PX5.5 - this chart would say the opposite.




    I'm afraid you misunderstand the purpose of the chart.Its got nothing to do with feel or ball curves, or spin and launch values for that matter.



    A certain club speed makes a need for a specific over all flex, but this value is changes by the amount of cpm's necessary due to the players way to swing his clubs.

    I'm using high speed camera, and playback to see what happens during transition, swing time, downswing, and release of the club. The players weight and strength, and preference for feel (soft or stiff) is also parameters for correction. The sum you end up with is used to identify shaft who meets this needs.



    Then you have to go to real life testing, and try the combo Head/Shaft, and measure with a trackman to see if you got where you wanted to, and also take the players feedback for feel and wish for ball curve into consideration. The chart is just for navigating in flex and shaft weight, but nothing of the other parameters needed to find the right shaft.




    This kind of chart doesn't make sense to me either.



    You can absolutely have two shafts with the SAME CPM butt frequency reading, that are widely DIFFERENT flexes, and most every golfer, upon hitting the two shaft varieties will be able to feel the DIFFERENT flex.



    It doesn't make sense that so many clubmakers cling to this single criteria of quantifying a shaft, when butt frequency is just that- only one part of the overall shaft flex.



    I know that EI charts are difficult to understand and relate to, but this analysis tells the whole movie, instead of a single snapshot of a butt frequency reading.



    3 step
Sign In or Register to comment.