Jump to content

Wishon Wedges


Ranchobob

Recommended Posts

The pcfs are a touch smaller and more round than the 588, and provide more spin imo.
The hm series are even more rounded on the toe, to my eye more offset than the pcf.
Both play everybit as good as any wedge.

Club Fitter/Builder (Wishon)

719MW  11* Red R Shaft - 919THI 11* Black S 65 shaft 
EQ1-NX 3, 927HS 5, 7 woods Red R-Flex
797HS 4 & 5 Red R Shaft 
585's, EQ1-NX, 550 combo, 575's, 565's various shafts
20+ wedges!

Wishon Cavity Black CB4 putter

Willy, Bridgy, Srixy Balls

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Ranchobob' timestamp='1428250239' post='11288043']
Can someone please explain the difference between Tom Wishon's PCF Micro Tour and Micro Groove HM wedges and weigh them against, say, Cleveland's 588 line of wedges and my current oil can Vokey wedges?

FWIW, my current wedges are (loft/bounce) 52/8, 56/10, 60/4.

Thank you!
[/quote]

No one will answer this as well as I can, so here goes.

PCF is designed with more of a rounder face profile, while the HM is designed with what the industry likes to call more of a "teardrop" profile. What that means is that the height of the heel side of the face is a little taller on the PCF than on the HM, so the shape of the top of the face profile is more rounded on the PCF but then a little less rounded and steeper as it descends to the shorter heel height on the HM. Wedges like the Vokey or Cleveland are considered to be more of a tear drop profile than rounded profile, for a reference point for you.

All my wedges are designed with 2mm offset, which is what the industry considers to be a visual non offset design. To most golfers when you get the offset to be less than 2mm, the leading edge starts to look like it is slightly out in front of the hosel. This just happens because of an optical illusion created by both eyes focused on the head.

The Micro Grooves are a scoreline design I developed some years ago to try to create a line design that could be conforming to the rules but still be able to put more lines in contact with the surface of the ball at impact. Conventional lines as made by the other companies are most typically manufactured to be 0.8mm wide (0.0315") X either 2.6mm ot 2.8mm spacing apart from edge to edge. I quote metric because the head making factories tend to tool in metric than in imperial.

The Micro Grooves are 0.6mm wide X 2.3mm spacing. So that means at impact there are 5 Micro Grooves in contact with the surface of the ball while with the conventional line design, there are 3 lines in contact with the ball. You can test this yourself using impact labels. So if you believe that the top edges of the scorelines bring about some of the backspin in a shot, then you have a tiny chance for a little more spin with 2 more lines in contact with the ball's surface at impact.

However, the vast majority of spin does come from the roughness of the flat areas between the lines. So on the PCF's we do a conventional circular milling pattern. And on the HM's we use a laser etch cut horizontal "milling".

With the new HM's that just came out, the sole design is quite different with a zero bounce heel and increased bounce on the very front center of the leading edge. PCF sole design has a zero bounce heel but the rest of the sole is a conventional single bounce grind design.

And that's about it in a nutshell, so I hope this helps,

TOM

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Ranchobob' timestamp='1428377876' post='11300333']
Tom, thank you for taking the time to explain it.

Can you clarify the bounce on your wedges for me? I noticed you don't have any specs cited.

Thanks again!
[/quote]

The specs for the sole angle of our wedges are on the specs sheet for each wedge model on our website in the green and white charts. Perhaps you were looking for the term BOUNCE and did not realize that SOLE ANGLE is the actual name of the spec for the angle of the sole for which bounce is a condition of the sole angle. Lots of golfers today are not aware of this and think the actual name of the spec is bounce.

At any rate, we now do a zero bounce heel sole angle for both the HM and PCF wedge families to enable the golfer to roll the face open and not have the leading edge rise up off the ground to potentially lead to more chance of bladed shots when you want to hit that open face finesse cut shot off closely mown grass. This zero bounce heel grind extends @ 20-25mm in from the heel after which the primary bounce on the sole angle is there.

PCF 52 is 5* bounce for the primary sole angle, the 56 is 12*, the 60* is 8*. HM Series 52 is 6* bounce, the 56 is 12* and the 60 is 10*.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Tom, thank you for taking the time to explain it.

 

Can you clarify the bounce on your wedges for me? I noticed you don't have any specs cited.

 

Thanks again!

 

The specs for the sole angle of our wedges are on the specs sheet for each wedge model on our website in the green and white charts. Perhaps you were looking for the term BOUNCE and did not realize that SOLE ANGLE is the actual name of the spec for the angle of the sole for which bounce is a condition of the sole angle. Lots of golfers today are not aware of this and think the actual name of the spec is bounce.

 

At any rate, we now do a zero bounce heel sole angle for both the HM and PCF wedge families to enable the golfer to roll the face open and not have the leading edge rise up off the ground to potentially lead to more chance of bladed shots when you want to hit that open face finesse cut shot off closely mown grass. This zero bounce heel grind extends @ 20-25mm in from the heel after which the primary bounce on the sole angle is there.

 

PCF 52 is 5* bounce for the primary sole angle, the 56 is 12*, the 60* is 8*. HM Series 52 is 6* bounce, the 56 is 12* and the 60 is 10*.

 

I know this topic has been dead for a while but I am just wondering if anyone has seen any sizeable diminishing of the groves/ score lines on the pcf wedges. I have had a set for three/four seasons and other than a slight discoloration on the sole there are no signs of wear at all. I truly think they spin as well as the day I got them.

 

I just went through a club fitting at CC and they didn't even want to touch my wedges because they were performing great.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice feedback, thanks.

TM SIM 10.5* - Ventus Velocore Blue TR 5S
TEE  XCG7B  3h  19* Ventus Velocore HB Blue 8S  
TEE  XCG7B  4h  22* Ventus Velocore HB Blue 8S
TEE  XCG7B  5h  25* Diamana Thump i465ct 4iron shaft
Wishon 560MC 5-PW (26,30,34,38,42.5,47) Recoil Proto 125 F4
Vokey SM7 50-08F S200 bent to 51*
Wishon HM wedges 56/60 Wishon Smooth steel Stiff
2013-2016 SC Futura X5R 33' flownecked by Bastain-cerakote sniper gray-silver dots-white flange sight line-SS Flatso 2.0

TM TP5x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tom, thank you for taking the time to explain it.

 

Can you clarify the bounce on your wedges for me? I noticed you don't have any specs cited.

 

Thanks again!

 

The specs for the sole angle of our wedges are on the specs sheet for each wedge model on our website in the green and white charts. Perhaps you were looking for the term BOUNCE and did not realize that SOLE ANGLE is the actual name of the spec for the angle of the sole for which bounce is a condition of the sole angle. Lots of golfers today are not aware of this and think the actual name of the spec is bounce.

 

At any rate, we now do a zero bounce heel sole angle for both the HM and PCF wedge families to enable the golfer to roll the face open and not have the leading edge rise up off the ground to potentially lead to more chance of bladed shots when you want to hit that open face finesse cut shot off closely mown grass. This zero bounce heel grind extends @ 20-25mm in from the heel after which the primary bounce on the sole angle is there.

 

PCF 52 is 5* bounce for the primary sole angle, the 56 is 12*, the 60* is 8*. HM Series 52 is 6* bounce, the 56 is 12* and the 60 is 10*.

 

I know this topic has been dead for a while but I am just wondering if anyone has seen any sizeable diminishing of the groves/ score lines on the pcf wedges. I have had a set for three/four seasons and other than a slight discoloration on the sole there are no signs of wear at all. I truly think they spin as well as the day I got them.

 

I just went through a club fitting at CC and they didn't even want to touch my wedges because they were performing great.

 

Its good that CC didnt trash Wishon wedges as 'components" perhaps they knew better

 

I have 2 sets of PCF wedges and they are great.lots of spin

 

I bent my 60 to 58 to make it more versatile (for me)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just looked at my PCF 56 (bent to 58*) and do concur, little to no wear on the face - spinny zippy.

Club Fitter/Builder (Wishon)

719MW  11* Red R Shaft - 919THI 11* Black S 65 shaft 
EQ1-NX 3, 927HS 5, 7 woods Red R-Flex
797HS 4 & 5 Red R Shaft 
585's, EQ1-NX, 550 combo, 575's, 565's various shafts
20+ wedges!

Wishon Cavity Black CB4 putter

Willy, Bridgy, Srixy Balls

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just looked at my PCF 56 (bent to 58*) and do concur, little to no wear on the face - spinny zippy.

 

How do you like the 56 bent to 58? I can't decide for my next set between using the set AW then 52 bent to 54 and 56 bent to 58 OR using the 52 bent to 50, 56 bent to 54, and 60 bent to 58.

 

Also, does anyone have thoughts on if the HM wedges spin as much as the pcf? The pcf are so spinny it's almost too much for me (not a complaint you hear much on wedges), so I would consider the HM wedges if they knock a touch of spin off.

Driver, 3W, 4W - Macgregor Custom Tourney
2-10 - 1954 Spalding Synchro Dyned
SW - Wilson Staff
Putter - Bullseye
Ball - Pro Plus

YT Channel - [url="https://www.youtube.com/PlayVintageGolf"]https://www.youtube....PlayVintageGolf[/url]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey baloo, hope you sare doing well.

I prefer weakening the lofts on the PCFs, this takes the leading edge just a touch forward and fits my eye better than strengthening the loft. The 56 to 58 bend makes the wedge look absolutley perfect, have the 52 to 54 as well, again perfection of a perfect design. PCF vs HM spin: they are close and I've found the PCF will spin more with the firm urethane balls, but with the mid to softer urethanes, they are equal, keep in mind I'm not an RPM monitor weenie, just my on course testing.

Club Fitter/Builder (Wishon)

719MW  11* Red R Shaft - 919THI 11* Black S 65 shaft 
EQ1-NX 3, 927HS 5, 7 woods Red R-Flex
797HS 4 & 5 Red R Shaft 
585's, EQ1-NX, 550 combo, 575's, 565's various shafts
20+ wedges!

Wishon Cavity Black CB4 putter

Willy, Bridgy, Srixy Balls

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

> @TomWishon said:

> Ranchobob wrote:

>

>

>

> Can someone please explain the difference between Tom Wishon's PCF Micro Tour and Micro Groove HM wedges and weigh them against, say, Cleveland's 588 line of wedges and my current oil can Vokey wedges?

>

>

>

> FWIW, my current wedges are (loft/bounce) 52/8, 56/10, 60/4.

>

>

>

> Thank you!

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> No one will answer this as well as I can, so here goes.

>

>

>

> PCF is designed with more of a rounder face profile, while the HM is designed with what the industry likes to call more of a "teardrop" profile. What that means is that the height of the heel side of the face is a little taller on the PCF than on the HM, so the shape of the top of the face profile is more rounded on the PCF but then a little less rounded and steeper as it descends to the shorter heel height on the HM. Wedges like the Vokey or Cleveland are considered to be more of a tear drop profile than rounded profile, for a reference point for you.

>

>

>

> All my wedges are designed with 2mm offset, which is what the industry considers to be a visual non offset design. To most golfers when you get the offset to be less than 2mm, the leading edge starts to look like it is slightly out in front of the hosel. This just happens because of an optical illusion created by both eyes focused on the head.

>

>

>

> The Micro Grooves are a scoreline design I developed some years ago to try to create a line design that could be conforming to the rules but still be able to put more lines in contact with the surface of the ball at impact. Conventional lines as made by the other companies are most typically manufactured to be 0.8mm wide (0.0315") X either 2.6mm ot 2.8mm spacing apart from edge to edge. I quote metric because the head making factories tend to tool in metric than in imperial.

>

>

>

> The Micro Grooves are 0.6mm wide X 2.3mm spacing. So that means at impact there are 5 Micro Grooves in contact with the surface of the ball while with the conventional line design, there are 3 lines in contact with the ball. You can test this yourself using impact labels. So if you believe that the top edges of the scorelines bring about some of the backspin in a shot, then you have a tiny chance for a little more spin with 2 more lines in contact with the ball's surface at impact.

>

>

>

> However, the vast majority of spin does come from the roughness of the flat areas between the lines. So on the PCF's we do a conventional circular milling pattern. And on the HM's we use a laser etch cut horizontal "milling".

>

>

>

> With the new HM's that just came out, the sole design is quite different with a zero bounce heel and increased bounce on the very front center of the leading edge. PCF sole design has a zero bounce heel but the rest of the sole is a conventional single bounce grind design.

>

>

>

> And that's about it in a nutshell, so I hope this helps,

>

>

>

> TOM

 

Which wedge has more spin? The PCF or the HM? Circular milling or the horizontal milling?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @TomWishon said:

> Ranchobob wrote:

>

>

>

> Can someone please explain the difference between Tom Wishon's PCF Micro Tour and Micro Groove HM wedges and weigh them against, say, Cleveland's 588 line of wedges and my current oil can Vokey wedges?

>

>

>

> FWIW, my current wedges are (loft/bounce) 52/8, 56/10, 60/4.

>

>

>

> Thank you!

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> No one will answer this as well as I can, so here goes.

>

>

>

> PCF is designed with more of a rounder face profile, while the HM is designed with what the industry likes to call more of a "teardrop" profile. What that means is that the height of the heel side of the face is a little taller on the PCF than on the HM, so the shape of the top of the face profile is more rounded on the PCF but then a little less rounded and steeper as it descends to the shorter heel height on the HM. Wedges like the Vokey or Cleveland are considered to be more of a tear drop profile than rounded profile, for a reference point for you.

>

>

>

> All my wedges are designed with 2mm offset, which is what the industry considers to be a visual non offset design. To most golfers when you get the offset to be less than 2mm, the leading edge starts to look like it is slightly out in front of the hosel. This just happens because of an optical illusion created by both eyes focused on the head.

>

>

>

> The Micro Grooves are a scoreline design I developed some years ago to try to create a line design that could be conforming to the rules but still be able to put more lines in contact with the surface of the ball at impact. Conventional lines as made by the other companies are most typically manufactured to be 0.8mm wide (0.0315") X either 2.6mm ot 2.8mm spacing apart from edge to edge. I quote metric because the head making factories tend to tool in metric than in imperial.

>

>

>

> The Micro Grooves are 0.6mm wide X 2.3mm spacing. So that means at impact there are 5 Micro Grooves in contact with the surface of the ball while with the conventional line design, there are 3 lines in contact with the ball. You can test this yourself using impact labels. So if you believe that the top edges of the scorelines bring about some of the backspin in a shot, then you have a tiny chance for a little more spin with 2 more lines in contact with the ball's surface at impact.

>

>

>

> However, the vast majority of spin does come from the roughness of the flat areas between the lines. So on the PCF's we do a conventional circular milling pattern. And on the HM's we use a laser etch cut horizontal "milling".

>

>

>

> With the new HM's that just came out, the sole design is quite different with a zero bounce heel and increased bounce on the very front center of the leading edge. PCF sole design has a zero bounce heel but the rest of the sole is a conventional single bounce grind design.

>

>

>

> And that's about it in a nutshell, so I hope this helps,

>

>

>

> TOM

 

I'm sorry but that just hasn't been my experience :p

 

![](https://media.giphy.com/media/qkXATkoqFd7oI/giphy.gif "")

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
5 hours ago, Barbara Scott said:

Does anyone know the hosel diameter on PCF micro tour wedges? Looking to reshaft and don’t know if I need parallel or taper tip shaft

 

All Wishon irons and wedges are .370 parallel hosels.  If a .355 taper shaft is your fit or preference, then just use a shim.  We do it all the time

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Sit tight,  new Wishon designs around the corner. 

Club Fitter/Builder (Wishon)

719MW  11* Red R Shaft - 919THI 11* Black S 65 shaft 
EQ1-NX 3, 927HS 5, 7 woods Red R-Flex
797HS 4 & 5 Red R Shaft 
585's, EQ1-NX, 550 combo, 575's, 565's various shafts
20+ wedges!

Wishon Cavity Black CB4 putter

Willy, Bridgy, Srixy Balls

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And Spring is right around the corner 😆🤣😂 😭

Club Fitter/Builder (Wishon)

719MW  11* Red R Shaft - 919THI 11* Black S 65 shaft 
EQ1-NX 3, 927HS 5, 7 woods Red R-Flex
797HS 4 & 5 Red R Shaft 
585's, EQ1-NX, 550 combo, 575's, 565's various shafts
20+ wedges!

Wishon Cavity Black CB4 putter

Willy, Bridgy, Srixy Balls

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TKS said:

Sit tight,  new Wishon designs around the corner. 

I know but very hard to get info. Waiting for drivers too. Apparently a new wood line too. Would be great if Wishon could be a bit more vocal on releases. From what I understand they had problems with factory and have been impacted by lockdown. Hopefully they will manage to get through this and have success with new gear. Patience…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • 2024 Valspar Championship WITB Photos (Thanks to bvmagic)- Discussion & Links to Photos
      This weeks WITB Pics are from member bvmagic (Brian). Brian's first event for WRX was in 2008 at Bayhill while in college. Thanks so much bv.
       
      Please put your comments or question on this thread. Links to all the threads are below...
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 31 replies
    • 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #3
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Matt (LFG) Every - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Sahith Theegala - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Cameron putters (and new "LD" grip) - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Bettinardi MB & CB irons - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Bettinardi API putter cover - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Swag API covers - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Golf Pride Reverse Taper grips - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 15 replies
    • 2024 Cognizant Classic - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #1
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #2
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #3
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #4
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Brandt Snedeker - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Max Greyserman - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Eric Cole - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Carl Yuan - WITb - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Russell Henley - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Justin Sun - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alex Noren - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Shane Lowry - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Taylor Montgomery - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jake Knapp (KnappTime_ltd) - WITB - - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Super Stoke Pistol Lock 1.0 & 2.0 grips - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      LA Golf new insert putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Garsen Quad Tour 15 grip - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Swag covers - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jacob Bridgeman's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Bud Cauley's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Ryo Hisatsune's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Chris Kirk - new black Callaway Apex CB irons and a few Odyssey putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alejandro Tosti's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 2 replies
    • 2024 Genesis Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #3
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #4
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Rory McIlroy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Sepp Straka - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Patrick Rodgers - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Brendon Todd - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Denny McCarthy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Corey Conners - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Chase Johnson - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tommy Fleetwood - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Matt Fitzpatrick - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Si Woo Kim - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Viktor Hovland - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Wyndham Clark - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Cam Davis - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Nick Taylor - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Ben Baller WITB update (New putter, driver, hybrid and shafts) – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Vortex Golf rangefinder - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Fujikura Ventus shaft - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods & TaylorMade "Sun Day Red" apparel launch event, product photos – 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods Sun Day Red golf shoes - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Aretera shafts - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Toulon putters - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods' new white "Sun Day Red" golf shoe prototypes – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      • 22 replies
    • 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put and questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open - Monday #1
      2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open - Monday #2
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Ben Taylor - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Garrick Higgo - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Billy Horschel - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Justin Lower - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Lanto Griffin - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Bud Cauley - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Corbin Burnes (2021 NL Cy Young) - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Greyson Sigg - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Charley Hoffman - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Nico Echavarria - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Victor Perez - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Sami Valimaki - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Ryo Hisatsune - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      Jake Knapp's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      New Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Tyler Duncan's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Greyson Sigg's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Sunjae Im's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Ping's Waste Management putter covers - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Vincent Whaley's custom Cameron - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Odyssey Waste Management putter covers - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Super Stroke custom grips - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Zac Blair's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Bettinardi Waste Management putter covers - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
       
       
       
       
       
       

       
      • 12 replies

×
×
  • Create New...