Jump to content

Shafting beads, why do/dont you use it?


EHolm

Recommended Posts

The shaft "straightness" will depending upon the fit of the shaft diameter to the hosel bore. If the shaft has too much play when in the hosel bore, shafting beads can be used to take up the clearance, thereby producing a better alignment of the shaft center line to the hosel center line (aka straightness).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the only con is people using too much as only a pinch is needed for re-shafting a set.

  • Like 1

Titleist 910 D3 7.5* w/ GD AD DI 6 stiff
Titleist 915 FD 15* w/ Fujikura Rombax P95 stiff
Titleist 910 F 19* w/ Fujikura Rombax P95 stiff
Mizuno MP 15 4-PW w/ Modus 3 Tour 125X ssx1
Titleist Vokey SM5 52* F w/ Modus 3 Tour 125X ssx1
Titleist Vokey TVD 56* w/ Modus 3 Tour 125X ssx1
Titleist Vokey SM6 60* S w/ Modus 3 Tour 125X ssx1
Piretti Matera Rev 2.0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, as a matter of fact, I just tried "Quick Center" on a build, as opposed to "Shafting Beads", and was wondering what the pros and cons of each were. We'll wait and listen.

 

Quick Center is larger in size, so that's the right one to use when there's too much space between the hosel and shaft,...but not enough space to use a shim.

 

Shafting beads basically just make the epoxy "thicker"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A bit of a controversial subject. Personally I'd like to see the hard data first then rely these types of statements but in full disclosure, according to Brampton, they can actually increase the structural bond.

 

https://bramptontechnology.com/pro-fix-shafting-beads/

 

Although I must admit, most of the failures I've read about seem to be associated with too high a percentage or ratio used (user error and misuse of the beads).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shafting beads are a filler material that reduces bond strength.

On what do you base the reduced strength on? Just curious :)

 

Ive heard that this is the case if the installer uses the shafting beads too much, but I have never had any personal issues/malfunctions. It is a thickener for a shaft tip and hosel bore that arent matched up well and is too small for shims. They work fine as long as you use a small amount and not try to overpower the epoxy with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shafting beads are microballoons. Hollow glass spheres. By definition it creates porosity in the epoxy and reduces density. What do you guys think that does for the bond material strength? I know it doesn't increase it or 3M and every epoxy maker would sell such a product for industrial use.

 

I first became aware of microballoons back when working with RC modeling. It was standard practice to add the filler into the epoxy (or polyester resin) and then use it to make fillets, which by virtue of the filler was then easy to sand because it creates porosity.

 

That Bramptons 20-20 epoxy is very thin (low viscosity). You gotta be careful to only use it if the shaft to hosel fit is snug with low clearance. If there is a gap adding shafting beads would be the lesser of evils because the thin epoxy will run out of the joint and collect at the bottom of the hosel and go up the shaft tip if you don't thicken it up some.

Ping G400 Max driver w/Aldila Rogue 125 Silver
Ping G425 5 wood & hybrid
Ping G30 irons w/Recoil 95

Ping G425 irons w/Accra ICWT 2.0 95
Ping Glide wedges w/Recoil 110
Ping Redwood Anser - the "real deal!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting - another shared hobby in our past :-)

 

Remember that the mixes used for weight reduction in RC were quite high. Not unusual to use a 1-1 (or 50%) mix of beads to epoxy. At that high a ratio, the strength would be significantly compromised. For golf what is typically used is more in the range of 5% by volume.

 

Now, I haven't found any specific papers studying and reporting the effect on the strength of the epoxy for that small a percentage (which would be nice for confirmation), but it wouldn't really surprise me if the impact was minimal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shafting beads are microballoons. Hollow glass spheres. By definition it creates porosity in the epoxy and reduces density. What do you guys think that does for the bond material strength? I know it doesn't increase it or 3M and every epoxy maker would sell such a product for industrial use.

 

I first became aware of microballoons back when working with RC modeling. It was standard practice to add the filler into the epoxy (or polyester resin) and then use it to make fillets, which by virtue of the filler was then easy to sand because it creates porosity.

 

That Bramptons 20-20 epoxy is very thin (low viscosity). You gotta be careful to only use it if the shaft to hosel fit is snug with low clearance. If there is a gap adding shafting beads would be the lesser of evils because the thin epoxy will run out of the joint and collect at the bottom of the hosel and go up the shaft tip if you don't thicken it up some.

Bramptons 20/20 is one of the thicker epoxies. Not sure where you get thin from. 20/20 is all i use unless i run out and use gorilla glue epoxy. Compared to tour epoxy from golfworks and one of the 3ms i tried 20/20 when mixed properly is probably the thickest.
  • AI Smoke 🔷🔷🔷10.5* Kaili White 60X
  • TM SIM Ti 18.25* - Tensei AV White 2.0 TX
  • TM Stealth 7w 21* - Fuji Pro 2.0 Tour Spec 8s
  • Srixon ZX Utility 23* MMT 105TX HS
  • Srixon ZX7 5-Aw PX LZ 6.5 SS
  • Mizuno T7 55* - PX LZ 6.5
  • TM MG4 60* SBC - DG TI S400
  • Bettinardi Inovai 6.0 2024
  • Tour B XS

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shafting beads (micro balloons) are far too small to have any real effect on centering the shaft. As a result, people use far too much and get into a problem with reducing the strength of the bond. Fortunately, epoxies these days are so good, people don't notice the reduction in strength and it usually is a non-issue. Beads are just the wrong item to be using.

 

Using a product like Quik Center is more likely to provide the centering of a shaft (due to poor fit) and quite similar to using a thin shim without having to use a shim. I will use Quik Center on occasion where I don't really have a shim option. The reason I prefer using a product like Quik Center is that it is visible and much larger than shafting beads. It really only takes a few grains (a pinch if you will) to do the job and you are far less likely to over use it.

 

A properly prepped shaft and hosel do not require either product.

  • Like 1

Ping G400 9º TFC 419 Stiff at 45"

Jazz 3 wd Powercoil Stiff
Rogue 3iron Recoil 660 F3 +1/2"
X2 Hot 4-AW Recoil 660 F3 +1/2"
Vokey SM2 52º cc, SM4 56°, SM4 60°
Ping Sigma2 Valor at 34.75"
MCC Align Midsize

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting - another shared hobby in our past :-)

 

Remember that the mixes used for weight reduction in RC were quite high. Not unusual to use a 1-1 (or 50%) mix of beads to epoxy. At that high a ratio, the strength would be significantly compromised. For golf what is typically used is more in the range of 5% by volume.

 

Now, I haven't found any specific papers studying and reporting the effect on the strength of the epoxy for that small a percentage (which would be nice for confirmation), but it wouldn't really surprise me if the impact was minimal.

 

 

I just picked up a couple of strips of 1/8" aluminum from our R&D shop. I'll cut them to length and make some test coupons for lap shear tensile testing.

 

I've got some DP420/460/810 and regular Golfworks epoxy. Maybe I should pick up some gorilla epoxy (just kidding). I'll make up a sample with shafting beads added for comparison purposes too. Give me a few days...

Ping G400 Max driver w/Aldila Rogue 125 Silver
Ping G425 5 wood & hybrid
Ping G30 irons w/Recoil 95

Ping G425 irons w/Accra ICWT 2.0 95
Ping Glide wedges w/Recoil 110
Ping Redwood Anser - the "real deal!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting - another shared hobby in our past :-)

 

Remember that the mixes used for weight reduction in RC were quite high. Not unusual to use a 1-1 (or 50%) mix of beads to epoxy. At that high a ratio, the strength would be significantly compromised. For golf what is typically used is more in the range of 5% by volume.

 

Now, I haven't found any specific papers studying and reporting the effect on the strength of the epoxy for that small a percentage (which would be nice for confirmation), but it wouldn't really surprise me if the impact was minimal.

 

 

I just picked up a couple of strips of 1/8" aluminum from our R&D shop. I'll cut them to length and make some test coupons for lap shear tensile testing.

 

I've got some DP420/460/810 and regular Golfworks epoxy. Maybe I should pick up some gorilla epoxy (just kidding). I'll make up a sample with shafting beads added for comparison purposes too. Give me a few days...

 

Sounds like an interesting and worth while experiment. I thought about it but don't have any shafting beads. Have you thought about how much clamping pressure to use?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is a shear strength test appropriate for clubheads instead of a torsion test or bending test? Seems like the loading (impact) is creates more torque and bending moment than shear load at the hosel interface.

 

Sorry I'm a mechanical engineer and did my Masters thesis on strength of materials.

Epic Speed 9* (VeloCore Blue 6S))

SIM2 Ti 15* (Tour AD BB 6SR)

Apex UW 17* (stock HZRDUS Smoke Black 70 5.5)

0311XP Gen3 4-PW (Accra 90i S)

RTX ZipCore 52* Mid (DG Tour Issue)

SM9 58-10S (DG)

HiToe 64* (HiRev 2.0)
Eleven CS

Any urethane “X” ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is a shear strength test appropriate for clubheads instead of a torsion test or bending test? Seems like the loading (impact) is creates more torque and bending moment than shear load at the hosel interface.

 

Sorry I'm a mechanical engineer and did my Masters thesis on strength of materials.

 

Torque on the head would result in shear stress on the glue joint - specifically in the circumferential direction (not axial).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes right. So the appropriate test is a twist between the 2 substrates/coupons, not a linear shear (unidirectional sliding). A tensile test is a straight pull which isn't representative either.

Epic Speed 9* (VeloCore Blue 6S))

SIM2 Ti 15* (Tour AD BB 6SR)

Apex UW 17* (stock HZRDUS Smoke Black 70 5.5)

0311XP Gen3 4-PW (Accra 90i S)

RTX ZipCore 52* Mid (DG Tour Issue)

SM9 58-10S (DG)

HiToe 64* (HiRev 2.0)
Eleven CS

Any urethane “X” ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shafting beads basically just make the epoxy "thicker"

 

This. If the shafting beads are smaller in diameter than the slack between the hosel and the shaft, than the beads will continually migrate around the shaft because there is nothing to stop them from moving around.

 

\ ooo | | ooo /

 

What is to stop some of the above 'beads' from moving to one side or the other? Nothing.

 

\ oooo | | oo /

 

You'll end up with something like this, above.

 

Now if you have something that has the diameter of three 'beads' in my example, then there is nowhere for the new spacer to go. You won't be able to fit two spacers on one side of the hosel. They are essentially spherical shims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only time I use shafting beads is on Ping irons. Ping intentionally makes a looser hosel so the shaft won't air lock if there is a Ping cushin anti-vibration insert installed.

 

The ferruless Ping hosel design affords a lot of epoxy cushion around the shaft except at the very bottom of the hosel where it necks down. You can actually see a little step at the bottom of the hosel if you look close. To get the shaft to seat all the way to the bottom of the hosel it's necessary to drive the shaft down into the hosel with a hammering motion. Failing to do this will result in a "short shaft" situation where the shaft doesn't go to the bottom of the hosel.

 

Some people think Ping uses super strong epoxy because pulling the heads can be difficult, but the difficulty doesn't come from the epoxy it comes from overcoming the interference fit of the head onto the shaft.

 

When the shaft is driven down firmly into the necked down portion of the hosel at the bottom that works to help center the shaft at the top of the hosel (somewhat). There is a lot of extra clearance around the shaft though. Sometimes the shaft will tilt in this clearance and throw off the loft and lie. Creaking noises from Ping shaft to hosel interface is very common too. Ping uses thick epoxy that doesn't slide down into the hosel. Using some thin epoxy like Bramptons can cause issues.

 

When building ferruless Ping's I like to use a couple of wraps of fiberglass drywall tape around the shaft in order to keep it centered better in the hosel. I also use 3M DP810 acrylic adhesive because it's super strong yet it remains flexible (to reduce risk of creaking noises). DP810 is also pretty thick so it doesn't migrate in the joint after application.

 

Bottom line is reshafting ferruless Ping's is fiddly work. I don't think the design clearance between the shaft and hosel wall has anything to do with Cushin inserts though.

Ping G400 Max driver w/Aldila Rogue 125 Silver
Ping G425 5 wood & hybrid
Ping G30 irons w/Recoil 95

Ping G425 irons w/Accra ICWT 2.0 95
Ping Glide wedges w/Recoil 110
Ping Redwood Anser - the "real deal!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pulled apart the sample coupons today. Test samples were made from 1/8" thick aluminum with a 1 sq-in overlap bond area. The samples were prepared by first degreasing with isopropyl alcohol and then abraded with 220 grit sanding roll, two directions, followed by a second IA degreasing. The samples were clamped together with a small spring clamp and allowed to cure at room temperature for 6 hours, then placed in a heated environment at 150F for one hour.

 

Sample #1 - 3M DP420

Sample #2 - Golfworks shafting epoxy

Sample #3 - Golfworks w/shafting beads

 

Tensile strength:

Sample #1 - 2219 lbs (psi)

Sample #2 - 1678

Sample #3 - 1426

 

I'll post photos of the test coupons later but observations are the following.

 

Sample #1 (3M) - adhesive pulled away from the coupon on one side by about 60%. This suggests poor adhesion to the base material. Poor prep on my part?

Sample #2 (Golfworks) - some adhesive pull away on one side but mostly the adhesive sheared.

Sample #3 (Golfworks w/beads) - similar to #2, adhesive seemed to stick pretty well to the coupon, but sheared.

 

I'm a little surprised by the low test numbers. I'm going to make up some more samples and do the test again just for kicks. When assembling the two coupon halfs in contact with each other after slathering them with epoxy they wanted to squirm around as the adhesive squished out. It was a little fiddly keeping the samples aligned while clamping and maybe some slight internal gaping was created. In a golf club environment the adhesive will be trapped in a gapped space, not clamped together, so I'm thinking that some sort of male/female sliding tube coupons would make for a better test. If I get motivated I'll make some better sample coupons...

 

At any rate, bottom line is that shafting beads did decrease bond strength. The strength drop was not drastic though.

 

 

  • Like 1

Ping G400 Max driver w/Aldila Rogue 125 Silver
Ping G425 5 wood & hybrid
Ping G30 irons w/Recoil 95

Ping G425 irons w/Accra ICWT 2.0 95
Ping Glide wedges w/Recoil 110
Ping Redwood Anser - the "real deal!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice.

 

What did you use to apply the force? The numbers could be reduced if the system allowed for a small amount of torque to cause a small peeling component. That also might explain the adhesive pulling away from one side more than the other.

 

A tensile strength tester machine was used.

 

I do believe there was some bending going on with sample #1, the 3M sample, because the coupons are now bent slightly. The clamp head on one side was locked down instead of being allowed to free float. That might be partly responsible for the low test numbers for that sample.

Ping G400 Max driver w/Aldila Rogue 125 Silver
Ping G425 5 wood & hybrid
Ping G30 irons w/Recoil 95

Ping G425 irons w/Accra ICWT 2.0 95
Ping Glide wedges w/Recoil 110
Ping Redwood Anser - the "real deal!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice.

 

What did you use to apply the force? The numbers could be reduced if the system allowed for a small amount of torque to cause a small peeling component. That also might explain the adhesive pulling away from one side more than the other.

 

A tensile strength tester machine was used.

 

I do believe there was some bending going on with sample #1, the 3M sample, because the coupons are now bent slightly. The clamp head on one side was locked down instead of being allowed to free float. That might be partly responsible for the low test numbers for that sample.

Interesting stuff. In your next text, could you do DP460 with and without beads? And also with the "recommended" amount of beads and with too much beads? That might give us more of benchmark without too many epoxy types involved.

 

And thanks for doing this kind of work.

Ping G400 9º TFC 419 Stiff at 45"

Jazz 3 wd Powercoil Stiff
Rogue 3iron Recoil 660 F3 +1/2"
X2 Hot 4-AW Recoil 660 F3 +1/2"
Vokey SM2 52º cc, SM4 56°, SM4 60°
Ping Sigma2 Valor at 34.75"
MCC Align Midsize

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Ness, have you used any of the Brampton epoxies? The seem to be white/clear versus the black colored Golfsmith/Golfworks epoxy I'm using. I haven't had any problems with the black stuff but it doesn't work well with white ferrules. I always seem to get some epoxy between the hosel and the ferrule, which results in an ugly black ring. Their website says to use beads, which is why I'm asking. Thanks!

917 D2 8.50* - Tensei CK Pro White 60
917 F2 13.5* - Rogue Max 70
816 H2 19.0* - D+ Plus 90
716 T-MB (3i, 4i) - Modus 120
716 CB (5-PW) - Modus 120
Hogan TK15 - 49, 55
Edel Deschutes

[url="http://www.golfwrx.com/forums/topic/1457364-pitchinwedges-witb/page__p__15152218#entry15152218"][color=#0000ff][b]Photo WITB[/b][/color][/url]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've used Brampton's 20-20 and it was fine as long as your joint is normal to snug. I found it thin and it might run out of the joint if there is a lot of clearance between the shaft and hosel.

Ping G400 Max driver w/Aldila Rogue 125 Silver
Ping G425 5 wood & hybrid
Ping G30 irons w/Recoil 95

Ping G425 irons w/Accra ICWT 2.0 95
Ping Glide wedges w/Recoil 110
Ping Redwood Anser - the "real deal!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Discussion and links to Photos
      Please put any questions or Comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Monday #1
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Monday #2
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #1
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #2
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #3
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Thorbjorn Olesen - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Ben Silverman - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jesse Droemer - SoTX PGA Section POY - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      David Lipsky - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Martin Trainer - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Zac Blair - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jacob Bridgeman - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Trace Crowe - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jimmy Walker - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Daniel Berger - WITB(very mini) - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Chesson Hadley - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Callum McNeill - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Rhein Gibson - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Patrick Fishburn - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Peter Malnati - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Raul Pereda - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Gary Woodland WITB (New driver, iron shafts) – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Padraig Harrington WITB – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      Tom Hoge's custom Cameron - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Piretti putters - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Ping putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Kevin Dougherty's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Bettinardi putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Erik Barnes testing an all-black Axis1 putter – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Tony Finau's new driver shaft – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
       
       
       
       
       
      • 7 replies
    • 2024 Valspar Championship WITB Photos (Thanks to bvmagic)- Discussion & Links to Photos
      This weeks WITB Pics are from member bvmagic (Brian). Brian's first event for WRX was in 2008 at Bayhill while in college. Thanks so much bv.
       
      Please put your comments or question on this thread. Links to all the threads are below...
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 31 replies
    • 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #3
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Matt (LFG) Every - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Sahith Theegala - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Cameron putters (and new "LD" grip) - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Bettinardi MB & CB irons - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Bettinardi API putter cover - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Swag API covers - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Golf Pride Reverse Taper grips - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 15 replies
    • 2024 Cognizant Classic - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #1
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #2
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #3
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #4
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Brandt Snedeker - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Max Greyserman - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Eric Cole - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Carl Yuan - WITb - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Russell Henley - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Justin Sun - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alex Noren - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Shane Lowry - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Taylor Montgomery - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jake Knapp (KnappTime_ltd) - WITB - - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Super Stoke Pistol Lock 1.0 & 2.0 grips - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      LA Golf new insert putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Garsen Quad Tour 15 grip - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Swag covers - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jacob Bridgeman's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Bud Cauley's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Ryo Hisatsune's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Chris Kirk - new black Callaway Apex CB irons and a few Odyssey putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alejandro Tosti's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      • 2 replies
    • 2024 Genesis Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #3
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #4
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Rory McIlroy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Sepp Straka - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Patrick Rodgers - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Brendon Todd - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Denny McCarthy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Corey Conners - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Chase Johnson - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tommy Fleetwood - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Matt Fitzpatrick - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Si Woo Kim - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Viktor Hovland - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Wyndham Clark - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Cam Davis - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Nick Taylor - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Ben Baller WITB update (New putter, driver, hybrid and shafts) – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Vortex Golf rangefinder - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Fujikura Ventus shaft - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods & TaylorMade "Sun Day Red" apparel launch event, product photos – 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods Sun Day Red golf shoes - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Aretera shafts - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Toulon putters - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods' new white "Sun Day Red" golf shoe prototypes – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      • 22 replies

×
×
  • Create New...