Jump to content
2024 Houston Open WITB Photos ×

Is slope function a gimmick for some rangefinders?


Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

The math they use is actually just basic triangle math. It measures the hypotenuse with the laser, assumes the flag is a 90 degree angle to that and gives you the other long leg of the triangle as the slope measurement to help you understand what it could "play as". Is it perfect? Nope and the challenge the OP stated is not something they cannot compensate for.

 

The laser doesn't know whether you are going to play a high shot or a low shot, it is just giving you a distance estimate. It is up to you to interpret that information and engineer the shot you need to make for your swing and the conditions.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

My most recent range finder has slope and I have come to the conclusion it is of little help ,at least on 99.9% of shots, at least at my local courses. Even with moderate elevation changes, the adjustment is no more than 5-6 yards. IMHO, usually I need to account MORE for wind condition and lie condition. Rough, uphill , downhills, all have greater impact than the 5-6 yard variations.

 

Basically I can account for a few yards just on my naked eye, and anything more than that would require me to be a + handicap which I am not.

Cobra F7+ - Stiff
Callaway V-Series 3 & 5 wood with Aldila Rouge Silver
Srixon 585 5-AW - Modus 105 Stiff
Ping Glide 2.0 Stealth 53 & 58 Degree
EVNROLL ER5
Srixon XV - Yellow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To somebody that has a slope laser I have a request. Next round have the tallest player take an uphill/downhill reading. Then have the shortest player take a reading from the exact same position. Let us know how the readings compare. Thanks.

 

As others stated my guess is the slope feature is of limited use. Over the years of playing I’ve learned to make fairly accurate guesstimates for club selection. My Bushnell V4 (non-slope) gives me enough data. I fine tune it from there. Just this week I started a round and the temp was in the upper 40’s. By the end of the round it was in the 70’s. Flattish course but there was at least a two club difference due just to temps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To somebody that has a slope laser I have a request. Next round have the tallest player take an uphill/downhill reading. Then have the shortest player take a reading from the exact same position. Let us know how the readings compare. Thanks.

 

As others stated my guess is the slope feature is of limited use. Over the years of playing I've learned to make fairly accurate guesstimates for club selection. My Bushnell V4 (non-slope) gives me enough data. I fine tune it from there. Just this week I started a round and the temp was in the upper 40's. By the end of the round it was in the 70's. Flattish course but there was at least a two club difference due just to temps.

What's your point?

 

I shot an object 102y away. From a height of about 4' it was showing 102y with an adjusted distance of 108y. From a height of about 8' (4' above the previous) it still showed 102y with an adjusted yardage of 108y.

 

Did you really expect a difference with such a small change in the length of one of the sides of the triangle?

Ping G400 9º TFC 419 Stiff at 45"

Jazz 3 wd Powercoil Stiff
Rogue 3iron Recoil 660 F3 +1/2"
X2 Hot 4-AW Recoil 660 F3 +1/2"
Vokey SM2 52º cc, SM4 56°, SM4 60°
Ping Sigma2 Valor at 34.75"
MCC Align Midsize

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To somebody that has a slope laser I have a request. Next round have the tallest player take an uphill/downhill reading. Then have the shortest player take a reading from the exact same position. Let us know how the readings compare. Thanks.

 

As others stated my guess is the slope feature is of limited use. Over the years of playing I've learned to make fairly accurate guesstimates for club selection. My Bushnell V4 (non-slope) gives me enough data. I fine tune it from there. Just this week I started a round and the temp was in the upper 40's. By the end of the round it was in the 70's. Flattish course but there was at least a two club difference due just to temps.

What's your point?

 

I shot an object 102y away. From a height of about 4' it was showing 102y with an adjusted distance of 108y. From a height of about 8' (4' above the previous) it still showed 102y with an adjusted yardage of 108y.

 

Did you really expect a difference with such a small change in the length of one of the sides of the triangle?

 

So a four foot distance didn’t affect the reading? You would think it would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the Bushnell and find it pretty useless, in terms of exact yardage. I will let me know if a shot is uphill or downhill by a little bit or a lot, which is helpful. But in for my game it doesnt take in to account hear enough yardage when hitting uphill. Maybe I don't hit it high enough.

Ping G400 Testing G410.  10.5 set at small -
Ping G410 3, 5 and 7 wood

Ping G410 5 hybrid-not much use.  
Mizuno JPX 921 Hot Metal. 5-G
Vokey 54.10, 2009 58.12 M, Testing TM MG2 60* TW grind and MG3 56* TW grind.  Or Ping Glide Stealth, 54,58 SS.  
Odyssey Pro #1 black
Hoofer, Ecco, Bushnell
ProV1x-mostly
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To somebody that has a slope laser I have a request. Next round have the tallest player take an uphill/downhill reading. Then have the shortest player take a reading from the exact same position. Let us know how the readings compare. Thanks.

 

As others stated my guess is the slope feature is of limited use. Over the years of playing I've learned to make fairly accurate guesstimates for club selection. My Bushnell V4 (non-slope) gives me enough data. I fine tune it from there. Just this week I started a round and the temp was in the upper 40's. By the end of the round it was in the 70's. Flattish course but there was at least a two club difference due just to temps.

What's your point?

 

I shot an object 102y away. From a height of about 4' it was showing 102y with an adjusted distance of 108y. From a height of about 8' (4' above the previous) it still showed 102y with an adjusted yardage of 108y.

 

Did you really expect a difference with such a small change in the length of one of the sides of the triangle?

 

So a four foot distance didn’t affect the reading? You would think it would.

My high school math told me it wouldn’t, but I went through the exercise to get actual numbers.

Ping G400 9º TFC 419 Stiff at 45"

Jazz 3 wd Powercoil Stiff
Rogue 3iron Recoil 660 F3 +1/2"
X2 Hot 4-AW Recoil 660 F3 +1/2"
Vokey SM2 52º cc, SM4 56°, SM4 60°
Ping Sigma2 Valor at 34.75"
MCC Align Midsize

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have one, but one of my playing companions does. On a severe downhill (150+ feet) par 3 shot, generally about 170 yards to the middle. I hit PW 150 (WRX!), can get that club to the front of the green (160). My companion, who's generally about 1 1/2 clubs behind me, is hitting 7 or 8. I hit it high, he's a mid-trajectory player.

 

I just ignore his slope reading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have one, but one of my playing companions does. On a severe downhill (150+ feet) par 3 shot, generally about 170 yards to the middle. I hit PW 150 (WRX!), can get that club to the front of the green (160). My companion, who's generally about 1 1/2 clubs behind me, is hitting 7 or 8. I hit it high, he's a mid-trajectory player.

 

I just ignore his slope reading.

Cool story. But I read your post three times and am wondering why you are ignoring the slope function?

Titleist TSR4 9° Tensei AV White 65

Titleist TSi3 strong 3w 13.5° Tensei AV White 70

Titleist TS3 19°  hybrid Tensei Blue/Titleist TSR3 24° Diamana Ahina

Titleist T150 5-pw Nippon Pro Modus 125

Vokey SM8 50° F & 56° M SM9 60°M

Cameron Newport w/ flow neck by Lamont/ Cameron Del Mar

 



 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pictures at the beginning of this thread tell the story. If you hit it high and have a more vertical drop you are less affected by the slope. If you hit it low then you are more affected (hitting shorter up hill and longer down hill). The numbers shown by the rangefinder are for someone with an "average" trajectory.

 

Most people underestimate the effect of the slope, but learn over time to compensate, which is fine if you play the same courses. If you know how to adjust the numbers provided, you can get a pretty good estimate the first time. Of course you still have to include the effects of the lie and the slope under your feet. If that's not valuable to you in scoring, turn it off, but its no gimmick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have one, but one of my playing companions does. On a severe downhill (150+ feet) par 3 shot, generally about 170 yards to the middle. I hit PW 150 (WRX!), can get that club to the front of the green (160). My companion, who's generally about 1 1/2 clubs behind me, is hitting 7 or 8. I hit it high, he's a mid-trajectory player.

 

I just ignore his slope reading.

Cool story. But I read your post three times and am wondering why you are ignoring the slope function?

 

Clear as mud? Just a random non-sequitur? I have no idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I know it has been over a year since the last post, but I found the discussion interesting. Nikon now has the "Coolshot Pro Stabilized" which can be set to provide straight line distance (like all non-slope) and also display the +/- height. (instead of an adjusted distance). Now you get an accurate reading of elevation change and you can make a better decision for club selection. I use that to improve my perception of height change and still keep my skills for making adjustments in my head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

The proprietary algorithm is a^2 + b^2 = c ^2. (Pythagorean Theorem). Assuming: a = actual distance and b=elevation change, you can do the math to figure out c (the playing distance). What the laser rangefinder does is figure out the angle to the target or pin. The proprietary algorithm used the rangefinder's angle of slope readings to figure out the elevation change. Then, the algorithm applies the Pythagorean theorem. That's why the manufacturer says the only variables that are relevant are elevation and true distance. In summary, the rangefinder figures out the variable (b), the elevation change, that a golf would have to guess. Then, applies the Pythagorean theorem to figure out the playing distance. Hope this helps clarify. Will say that I was not paying attention in 8th Grade, so had to go to the books to figure this one out.

Eighth grade is when students learn the Pythagorean theorem in the Common Core State Standards. The Pythagorean theorem is this: In a right triangle, the sum of the squares of the lengths of the two legs is equal to the square of the length of the hypotenuse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

rangefinder-slope-adjustment.jpg

DRIVERS (TBD):  PXG BLACK OPS TOUR 8*,  BLACK OPS TOUR 10.5*,  BLACK OPS STD 8*;  Vanquish 4TX / Diamana WB 53x / GD AD-VF 5s / Ventus TR Black 5x / Kaili White, Blue, Red 60x / Tensei AV White/Blue 65x / Diamana S+ 60x

FAIRWAYS:  TAYLORMADE STEALTH 2+ FAIRWAYS/HYBRIDS:  R13.5( FW Rocket TI), 12.8*, Kaili White/Blue 70X;  #3 FW, 15.0*, Kaili Blue 70X/Red 75X;  #4 FW TI, 16.6*, Kaili White 70TX;  #6 FW TI, 20.3*, Kaili White 80TX;  #3 HY 19.5*, Kaili White 90TX; #4 HY 22*, Kaili White 90X

PXG GEN5 0311X, Black Label Elite, 22*, Accra TZFive, 105DI, M5

PXG 0317T, Xtreme Dark, 5 - GW, LAGP L Series, X

PXG  GEN6 Two Sets 0311XP, Double Black and Xtreme Dark, 4 - LW, LAGP L Series, X

TAYLORMADE P7TW, 5 - GW, LAGP L Series, X

PXG 0311 Sugar Daddy II Milled Wedges, Xtreme Dark, 54*/10, 56*/10, 58*/10, 62*/10; // LAGP L Series, S

SCOTTY CAMERON CONCEPT X 7.2 LTD,  LAGOLF P 135g shaft // LAGOLF BEL-AIR X Forged Carbon Putter // TOULON GARAGE - Austin Custom Rose Gold // STEWART GOLF Q Follow Electric Cart..Carbon // SKYCADDIE SX550 // COBALT Q6 Slope

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
On 8/5/2020 at 10:54 AM, Guest said:

The proprietary algorithm is a^2 + b^2 = c ^2. (Pythagorean Theorem). Assuming: a = actual distance and b=elevation change, you can do the math to figure out c (the playing distance). What the laser rangefinder does is figure out the angle to the target or pin. The proprietary algorithm used the rangefinder's angle of slope readings to figure out the elevation change. Then, the algorithm applies the Pythagorean theorem. That's why the manufacturer says the only variables that are relevant are elevation and true distance. In summary, the rangefinder figures out the variable (b), the elevation change, that a golf would have to guess. Then, applies the Pythagorean theorem to figure out the playing distance. Hope this helps clarify. Will say that I was not paying attention in 8th Grade, so had to go to the books to figure this one out.

Eighth grade is when students learn the Pythagorean theorem in the Common Core State Standards. The Pythagorean theorem is this: In a right triangle, the sum of the squares of the lengths of the two legs is equal to the square of the length of the hypotenuse.

Not even close to what slope algorithms do. Too smart for his own good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Old topic - I know.  I've got a rangefinder for Christmas and it doesn't have slope.  First reaction - I need slope.  Thought about it further - I don't think I need slope.  The OP nails it when it comes to questions about slope.  I'm concluding that my experience is as good as knowing slope.  I also conclude that it only adds value to shots that I've got no history with (courses I don't play).  Once I've played it a half dozen times I know the correction needed way better than any slope algorithm (that wasn't built on my data) could.

 

And another thing... the smart a**es with geometry finger wags don't have a clue about what slope correction actually is.  It's not at all simply about the Pythagorean theorem.  I'll bet their golf is probably about as bad as their science skills.

 

Edited by sr eaglemaster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, st1800e said:

I find that the trajectory of the shot influences the carry when hitting uphill or down hill. Not sure how the algorithim factors that in, or not. 

 

Well shot trajectory for any given club will always effect carry distance  but...

 

The real issue is that they are basically just guessing at a decent angle.   Maybe constant, maybe it varies with distance depending on the complexity of the algorithm.  But it's still just a guess - it's not anything that can be computed without knowing the specific ball launch conditions.   So it will always be hit or miss as to how good a fit it might be to any individual's swing and ball flight.

 

 

9 hours ago, sr eaglemaster said:

And another thing... the smart a**es with geometry finger wags don't have a clue about what slope correction actually is.  It's not at all simply about the Pythagorean theorem.  I'll bet their golf is probably about as bad as their science skills.

 

 

There are respectful ways to try and correct someone, and there is the opposite - like this.   It's even worse because you're wrong.

 

Once that decent angle guess is made, the actual calculations are extremely simple.  Although much more likely they use simple trigonometry instead of directly using Pythagorean's theorem.  But the results would be the same either way.

 

Edited by Stuart_G
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Discussion and links to Photos
      Please put any questions or Comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Monday #1
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Monday #2
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #1
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #2
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #3
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Thorbjorn Olesen - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Ben Silverman - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jesse Droemer - SoTX PGA Section POY - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      David Lipsky - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Martin Trainer - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Zac Blair - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jacob Bridgeman - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Trace Crowe - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jimmy Walker - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Daniel Berger - WITB(very mini) - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Chesson Hadley - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Callum McNeill - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Rhein Gibson - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Patrick Fishburn - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Peter Malnati - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Raul Pereda - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Gary Woodland WITB (New driver, iron shafts) – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Padraig Harrington WITB – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      Tom Hoge's custom Cameron - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Piretti putters - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Ping putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Kevin Dougherty's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Bettinardi putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Erik Barnes testing an all-black Axis1 putter – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Tony Finau's new driver shaft – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
       
       
       
       
       
      • 9 replies
    • 2024 Valspar Championship WITB Photos (Thanks to bvmagic)- Discussion & Links to Photos
      This weeks WITB Pics are from member bvmagic (Brian). Brian's first event for WRX was in 2008 at Bayhill while in college. Thanks so much bv.
       
      Please put your comments or question on this thread. Links to all the threads are below...
       
       
       
       
      • 31 replies
    • 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #3
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Matt (LFG) Every - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Sahith Theegala - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Cameron putters (and new "LD" grip) - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Bettinardi MB & CB irons - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Bettinardi API putter cover - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Swag API covers - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Golf Pride Reverse Taper grips - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 15 replies
    • 2024 Cognizant Classic - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #1
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #2
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #3
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #4
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Brandt Snedeker - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Max Greyserman - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Eric Cole - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Carl Yuan - WITb - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Russell Henley - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Justin Sun - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alex Noren - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Shane Lowry - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Taylor Montgomery - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jake Knapp (KnappTime_ltd) - WITB - - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Super Stoke Pistol Lock 1.0 & 2.0 grips - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      LA Golf new insert putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Garsen Quad Tour 15 grip - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Swag covers - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jacob Bridgeman's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Bud Cauley's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Ryo Hisatsune's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Chris Kirk - new black Callaway Apex CB irons and a few Odyssey putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alejandro Tosti's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      • 2 replies
    • 2024 Genesis Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #3
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #4
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Rory McIlroy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Sepp Straka - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Patrick Rodgers - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Brendon Todd - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Denny McCarthy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Corey Conners - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Chase Johnson - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tommy Fleetwood - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Matt Fitzpatrick - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Si Woo Kim - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Viktor Hovland - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Wyndham Clark - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Cam Davis - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Nick Taylor - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Ben Baller WITB update (New putter, driver, hybrid and shafts) – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Vortex Golf rangefinder - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Fujikura Ventus shaft - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods & TaylorMade "Sun Day Red" apparel launch event, product photos – 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods Sun Day Red golf shoes - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Aretera shafts - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Toulon putters - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods' new white "Sun Day Red" golf shoe prototypes – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      • 22 replies

×
×
  • Create New...