Jump to content

Is Increasing Driving Distance Ruining the Pro Tours? (***CONTENTS UNDER MOD REVIEW***)


clublender

Recommended Posts

Recently the USGA and the R&A, who make the rules for golf, released their third annual report on driving distances on the professional tours. While their first two reports found consistent but not significant growth, that all changed with the most recent report, which cited all-time highs in 2017 on all five of the men’s tours (PGA Tour, PGA Tour Champions, Web.com Tour, European Tour and Japan Golf Tour). They also found an increase on the Ladies European Tour, although the LPGA Tour showed a small decline last year. The “unusual and concerning” record-setting distance numbers led the ruling bodies to call for more research on the issue. What do you think? Do you love to see booming drives and players trying to hit par fours in one and par fives with a drive and a wedge? Or has increased driving distance turned the pro tours into drive-and-putt games with none of the challenge of mid and long iron shots, let alone a fairway wood? And have longer drives made it harder to identify with the pros, who appear to be playing an entirely different game than most mere mortals, even while destroying the competitiveness of some of golf's most hallowed courses?

Edited by 1t2golf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is your theory that if everyone on tour hit it 50 yards shorter more people would pay to watch?

 

That seems to contradict both common sense and the historical trend. The tour and its players have never been more wealthy and they have never hit it farther.

 

Correlation may not imply causation but it sure as heck doesn’t imply opposite causation!

 

This whole idiotic media campaign seems to be based on the notion that it is inherently more entertaining to watch someone hit a golf ball 250 yards than 300 yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole idiotic media campaign seems to be based on the notion that it is inherently more entertaining to watch someone hit a

golf ball

250 yards than 300 yards.

 

No; it is just more interesting to watch a golf tournament at The Old Course, or Merion, or Shinnecock Hills, than it is to watch a golf tournament at the TPC of Wherever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best part about this is pros driving par 4's and par5's driver and wedge.....There is maybe one hole on every course that I have played that has something like this, which also follows risk reward all the time. Problem is people get salty that these guys, girls are that good that their miss is better(way better) then everyone on here and the general public. But when they do miss, you don't see them covering John make a bogey on that short easy par 4 because he missed in a bad spot. But you know the people that focus on distance are the people that usually never obtain it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like it when one or two guys stand out as bombers. Today I feel like there are two dozen guys, maybe more, that have that bomber rep. Then there are probably another two dozen that are bombers but we never hear about them because they don’t contend.

 

I wouldn’t say it is ruining golf because I love watching golf. But I think if reaching par 5s in two and driving short par 4s was more of a novelty rather than a routine happening, the game would be even better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But you know the people that focus on distance are the people that usually never obtain it.

That’s interesting. When we have the debate at my club about rolling the equipment back it’s always the longer hitters that are all for it and the shorter hitters that don’t want it changed. The longer hitters want their advantage back and the short knocks enjoy occasionally putting it out there 300 plus when they have a nice breeze at their back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I absolutely hate when people think that they need to roll back the distance for a couple of reasons.

 

1. Do they limit how far you can throw/kick a football, shoot a basketball, how fast a hockey puck goes, etc.? No...so why would they limit how far a ball can go? We already have limits for COR in place for both the ball and clubs. Most of the distance gains in recent years is from people swinging faster because golf is attracting more athletes....are they going to tell people they can only swing at 118mph too?

 

2. Distance isn't everything....if it was, DJ, Rory, Bubba and Gary Woodland would win 90% of the events.

 

3. Distance increases could be easily offset by thicker/longer rough and slightly firmer greens which would place more of a premium on accuracy and hitting the fairway. The faster you swing, the wider your potential misses could be.

Driver: Sim2 with Ventus Blue 6x
FWY: Sim 2 Ti w/ TenseiAV Raw Blue 75x
Hybrid: PXG 0317x 17* with Fuji Pro 2.0 85x
Irons: PXG 0211ST w/KBS Tour X
54*: Titleist SM6 S grind black finish
58*: New Level Golf SPN Forged M Grind
Putter: Toulon San Diego

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But you know the people that focus on distance are the people that usually never obtain it.

That's interesting. When we have the debate at my club about rolling the equipment back it's always the longer hitters that are all for it and the shorter hitters that don't want it changed. The longer hitters want their advantage back and the short knocks enjoy occasionally putting it out there 300 plus when they have a nice breeze at their back.

 

Weird viewpoint, I don't feel that my length isn't an advantage still or that I have lost it due to the ball going farther. I think more people just hit the ball long nowadays especially in the competitive ranks. But the ball is only part of the equation. I definitely don't think a shorter ball would make the pro tours more entertaining.

Titleist TSi3 10* TPO 1K 60-TX
Titleist 917F3 15* VA Composite Drago 75-X
Titleist TSr3 19* Ventus Black 10-TX
Mizuno MP-20 4-9 PX 6.5

Mizuno T20 47-07 PX 6.5

Mizuno T22 52-09 56-10 PX 6.5

Vokey SM9 60-04T PX Wedge 6.5
Special Select Squareback 2 w/ SuperStroke Pistol GT 1.0

ProV1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I absolutely hate when people think that they need to roll back the distance for a couple of reasons.

 

1. Do they limit how far you can throw/kick a football, shoot a basketball, how fast a hockey puck goes, etc.? No...so why would they limit how far a ball can go? We already have limits for COR in place for both the ball and clubs. Most of the distance gains in recent years is from people swinging faster because golf is attracting more athletes....are they going to tell people they can only swing at 118mph too?

 

But of course, nobody is spending millions in R&D budgets to sell farther-flying footballs, basketballs or hockey pucks. So that, in a word, is why your analogy fails. There are many more reasons. One good one seemed like enough.

 

2. Distance isn't everything....if it was, DJ, Rory, Bubba and Gary Woodland would win 90% of the events.

 

Aaaaand, as it always needs to be said, the notion of a ball rollback has absolutely nothing to do with any competitive advantage for any player or groups of players. The notion of a golf ball rollback is to protect the competitive and strategic integrity of historic, classic championship golf courses.

 

3. Distance increases could be easily offset by thicker/longer rough and slightly firmer greens which would place more of a premium on accuracy and hitting the fairway. The faster you swing, the wider your potential misses could be.

 

Wait, you said "a couple"! Alright, you can have one more shot at it. But no, distance increases are not "easily offset" by longer rough and firmer greens. They already firm up the greens at every Tour stop. We mortals have no idea, how hard those greens are, without a big rain. (And the possibility of rain is a good reason to keep a course as dry and as firm and as fast as possible.) But beyond that, it is not easy, or inexpensive, or good for the game, to trick up golf courses in order to use those tricks to combat technological distance. The better, easier, cheaper thing BY FAR is to just correct the golf ball distance problem by changing the balls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But I think if reaching par 5s in two and driving short par 4s was more of a novelty rather than a routine happening, the game would be even better.

I disagree...hitting par 4s in 1 and 5s in two rewards long shot accuracy (compared to a par 4 that is drive/wedge for most of the field). Often times there is a risk/reward tradeoff on these holes, so an inaccurate long shot can cost you a lot (which tends to be less the case on may drive/wedge par 4s). In short, if a course is all mid-length par 4s and un-reachable par 5s, short-iron and wedge accuracy is tested repeatedly, but long shot accuracy is only tested to a limited extent (as there is not usually that much reward for middle vs side of fairway, or even rough in some cases compared to a lot of reward for hitting it 2 feet from the pin from a long distance).

 

What makes the Masters so great? 13 & 15 where long shot accuracy is rewarded and bad shots are penalized. Making it a novelty for a pro to go for it on these holes would not be an improvement.

 

Personally, when I am swinging really well, I am good with the longer clubs into greens, but it is hard to get away with bad swings on these clubs into greens when I am not swinging well...much easier to get away with mediocre swings when hitting these clubs to the fairway rather than green.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Wait, you said "a couple"! Alright, you can have one more shot at it. But no, distance increases are not "easily offset" by longer rough and firmer greens. They already firm up the greens at every Tour stop. We mortals have no idea, how hard those greens are, without a big rain. (And the possibility of rain is a good reason to keep a course as dry and as firm and as fast as possible.) But beyond that, it is not easy, or inexpensive, or good for the game, to trick up golf courses in order to use those tricks to combat technological distance. The better, easier, cheaper thing BY FAR is to just correct the golf ball distance problem by changing the balls.

 

Or just grow the fairway grass longer, you know, the way fairways were cut when these courses were originally built.

TSR2 10 Ventus Blue velocore  6S
Paradym Ai Smoke 3D  Ventus Red velocore 7S
Apex '21 19 + 21  GD ADDI 85S
MP20 HMB 5-P Steelfiber S 110
SM9 50F, 55M, 60K Steelfiber S 95
Toulon Chicago

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No it is not. Those who think it is are typically has beens, never wass, or have a financial stake in the game. No courses have been “destroyed” either.

 

Also, you are not supposed to relate to the play of tour pros.

 

You put "destroyed" in quotes but I'm not sure who you were quoting. I don't think that is a term that I used.

 

And I want to make it clear again; if anybody thinks that there is a kind of a generational divide in the golf ball-rollback debate, it is only for one reason. Current players all have equipment contracts and most particularly there are a lot of contracts with a certain equipment manufacturer. If we are to play the game of "financial interests over the best interests of golf," look no farther that the Number One Golf Ball company in the world and the aggressive messaging of its former CEO.

 

Jack Nicklaus -- winner of more majors than anyone, designer of more golf courses than any other great player, the Sports Illustrated athlete of the century, the most important figure in golf in our lifetimes -- knows exactly what I am talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait, you said "a couple"! Alright, you can have one more shot at it. But no, distance increases are not "easily offset" by longer rough and firmer greens. They already firm up the greens at every Tour stop. We mortals have no idea, how hard those greens are, without a big rain. (And the possibility of rain is a good reason to keep a course as dry and as firm and as fast as possible.) But beyond that, it is not easy, or inexpensive, or good for the game, to trick up golf courses in order to use those tricks to combat technological distance. The better, easier, cheaper thing BY FAR is to just correct the golf ball distance problem by changing the balls.

 

Or just grow the fairway grass longer, you know, the way fairways were cut when these courses were originally built.

 

"When these courses were originally built," most of them had no underground watering at all for their fairways. Depending on the weather, they might have been even faster on the fairways than what we see today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps if hitting it the rough was actually penal these guys wouldn't just bomb it and gouge it. They would have to actually think their way around the course. That only happens in a few tournaments every year.

 

Penal rough doesn’t create the need to think. If anything it does the exact opposite and encourages players to blast away considering you will always hit balls in the rough, regardless of what club you hit off the tee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait, you said "a couple"! Alright, you can have one more shot at it. But no, distance increases are not "easily offset" by longer rough and firmer greens. They already firm up the greens at every Tour stop. We mortals have no idea, how hard those greens are, without a big rain. (And the possibility of rain is a good reason to keep a course as dry and as firm and as fast as possible.) But beyond that, it is not easy, or inexpensive, or good for the game, to trick up golf courses in order to use those tricks to combat technological distance. The better, easier, cheaper thing BY FAR is to just correct the golf ball distance problem by changing the balls.

 

Or just grow the fairway grass longer, you know, the way fairways were cut when these courses were originally built.

 

"When these courses were originally built," most of them had no underground watering at all for their fairways. Depending on the weather, they might have been even faster on the fairways than what we see today.

 

Depending on the weather? Yeah, depending on the weather many course conditions vary from faster to slower - 100 years ago and today. Overall, modern agronomy allows fairways to be mowed extremely low and kept fast. It's incredible to me how much run out these guys get on their drives.

TSR2 10 Ventus Blue velocore  6S
Paradym Ai Smoke 3D  Ventus Red velocore 7S
Apex '21 19 + 21  GD ADDI 85S
MP20 HMB 5-P Steelfiber S 110
SM9 50F, 55M, 60K Steelfiber S 95
Toulon Chicago

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps if hitting it the rough was actually penal these guys wouldn't just bomb it and gouge it. They would have to actually think their way around the course. That only happens in a few tournaments every year.

 

Penal rough doesn’t create the need to think. If anything it does the exact opposite and encourages players to blast away considering you will always hit balls in the rough, regardless of what club you hit off the tee.

 

So your saying that every drive hit by a professional golfer, regardless of what club he uses, will never find the fairway? You're saying that a player doesn't need to think about what club to hit off the tee?

 

I doubt that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think most of the distance gains have come from the players themselves, NOT the equipment. Pro golfers today are high level athletes that put in a ton of physical training (not with a golf club), not a bunch of sloppy looking guys drinking their butts off in the 19th hole. Players today are bigger, stronger and way more fit than any other generation of golfers. Tiger was an anomaly back when he came on tour.... now, almost everyone is as fit as Tiger.

 

If they want to protect courses, they should just narrow the fairways and get the rough grow a few inches longer. That will do the trick. You'd see alot of bombers being handcuffed off the tee and using 3W or long irons.... bringing more varied player types into contention.

 

No need to mess with the equipment.

 

-ZA

TM SIM 9.0 with Fujikura Ventus Velocore Blue 6X

TM SIM 15 deg 3W with Project X Smoke Green S

TM SIM2 3H with Fujikura Ventus Velocore Blue 9X

TM M3 4H with Fujikura Ventus Velocore Blue 9X

TM P790 5i with KBS $-Taper 120

TM P760 6-PW with KBS $-Taper 120

TM Hi Toe 50, 55 & 60 with DG S300

Scotty Cameron Phantom X 11.5 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps if hitting it the rough was actually penal these guys wouldn't just bomb it and gouge it. They would have to actually think their way around the course. That only happens in a few tournaments every year.

 

Penal rough doesn’t create the need to think. If anything it does the exact opposite and encourages players to blast away considering you will always hit balls in the rough, regardless of what club you hit off the tee.

 

So your saying that every drive hit by a professional golfer, regardless of what club he uses, will never find the fairway? You're saying that a player doesn't need to think about what club to hit off the tee?

 

I doubt that.

 

No. What I am saying is that when you institute penal rough into play, the penalty for missing fairways and being a long distance away from the hole increases exponentially, and given that no golfers are perfect, and even professionals miss fairways with 3 woods and 2 irons a non-insignificant amount, you are encouraging them to just move the ball down the hole as far as possible i.e. removing thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole idiotic media campaign seems to be based on the notion that it is inherently more entertaining to watch someone hit a

golf ball

250 yards than 300 yards.

 

No; it is just more interesting to watch a golf tournament at The Old Course, or Merion, or Shinnecock Hills, than it is to watch a golf tournament at the TPC of Wherever.

 

That is your opinion. Merion is still a great course if set up properly. The problem isn't the course at a lot of the older venues. The problem is logistics of getting people in and out, places to stay, bringing seating in, tents in, etc. because there isn't enough room.

I am GenX.  If you really think I care about what you have to say, I don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait, you said "a couple"! Alright, you can have one more shot at it. But no, distance increases are not "easily offset" by longer rough and firmer greens. They already firm up the greens at every Tour stop. We mortals have no idea, how hard those greens are, without a big rain. (And the possibility of rain is a good reason to keep a course as dry and as firm and as fast as possible.) But beyond that, it is not easy, or inexpensive, or good for the game, to trick up golf courses in order to use those tricks to combat technological distance. The better, easier, cheaper thing BY FAR is to just correct the golf ball distance problem by changing the balls.

 

Or just grow the fairway grass longer, you know, the way fairways were cut when these courses were originally built.

 

"When these courses were originally built," most of them had no underground watering at all for their fairways. Depending on the weather, they might have been even faster on the fairways than what we see today.

 

Depending on the weather? Yeah, depending on the weather many course conditions vary from faster to slower - 100 years ago and today. Overall, modern agronomy allows fairways to be mowed extremely low and kept fast. It's incredible to me how much run out these guys get on their drives.

 

Firm and fast fairways are good! What is not to like about firm and fast fairways? Firm and fast fairways force players to think; think about how a ball will move once it is on the ground. Think about how to play the angles, and set up the next shot. Firm and fast adds to the mental part of the game, it is another dimension of strategy and planning and shot-shaping.

 

We want courses to be as firm and as fast as possible; and we can fix any consequent distance problems by fixing that really inconsequential part of the distance equation, which is the golf ball. Making the courses faster, and the balls slower = big fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a new and interesting topic.

You know if a bunch of threads just like this one were created we could discuss this interesting topic in even greater detail.

 

 

I don't think that I have started a single one of these threads. They get started, repeatedly, because there is a regular drumbeat of commentary on the subject. And it is not going away. Not if you belive Mike Davis, and I think that when it comes to the Rules of Golf, and the rules concerning equipment, and the setup of championship golf courses, Mike Davis is a pretty good guy to pay attention to.

 

It is the single most pressing issue, and probably the most globally-important issue, in golf today. (Pace of play and cost of play being constants.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a new and interesting topic.

You know if a bunch of threads just like this one were created we could discuss this interesting topic in even greater detail.

 

 

I don't think that I have started a single one of these threads. They get started, repeatedly, because there is a regular drumbeat of commentary on the subject. And it is not going away. Not if you belive Mike Davis, and I think that when it comes to the Rules of Golf, and the rules concerning equipment, and the setup of championship golf courses, Mike Davis is a pretty good guy to pay attention to.

 

It is the single most pressing issue, and probably the most globally-important issue, in golf today. (Pace of play and cost of play being constants.)

Agreed. You have not been the one starting fires. You do, however, spend an awful lot of time pouring gas on the ones already burning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1t2golf changed the title to Is Increasing Driving Distance Ruining the Pro Tours? (***CONTENTS UNDER MOD REVIEW***)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Discussion and links to Photos
      Please put any questions or Comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Monday #1
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Monday #2
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #1
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #2
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #3
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Thorbjorn Olesen - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Ben Silverman - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jesse Droemer - SoTX PGA Section POY - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      David Lipsky - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Martin Trainer - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Zac Blair - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jacob Bridgeman - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Trace Crowe - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jimmy Walker - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Daniel Berger - WITB(very mini) - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Chesson Hadley - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Callum McNeill - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Rhein Gibson - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Patrick Fishburn - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Peter Malnati - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Raul Pereda - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Gary Woodland WITB (New driver, iron shafts) – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Padraig Harrington WITB – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      Tom Hoge's custom Cameron - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Piretti putters - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Ping putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Kevin Dougherty's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Bettinardi putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Erik Barnes testing an all-black Axis1 putter – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Tony Finau's new driver shaft – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
       
       
       
       
       
      • 7 replies
    • 2024 Valspar Championship WITB Photos (Thanks to bvmagic)- Discussion & Links to Photos
      This weeks WITB Pics are from member bvmagic (Brian). Brian's first event for WRX was in 2008 at Bayhill while in college. Thanks so much bv.
       
      Please put your comments or question on this thread. Links to all the threads are below...
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 31 replies
    • 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #3
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Matt (LFG) Every - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Sahith Theegala - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Cameron putters (and new "LD" grip) - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Bettinardi MB & CB irons - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Bettinardi API putter cover - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Swag API covers - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Golf Pride Reverse Taper grips - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 15 replies
    • 2024 Cognizant Classic - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #1
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #2
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #3
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #4
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Brandt Snedeker - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Max Greyserman - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Eric Cole - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Carl Yuan - WITb - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Russell Henley - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Justin Sun - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alex Noren - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Shane Lowry - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Taylor Montgomery - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jake Knapp (KnappTime_ltd) - WITB - - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Super Stoke Pistol Lock 1.0 & 2.0 grips - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      LA Golf new insert putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Garsen Quad Tour 15 grip - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Swag covers - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jacob Bridgeman's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Bud Cauley's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Ryo Hisatsune's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Chris Kirk - new black Callaway Apex CB irons and a few Odyssey putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alejandro Tosti's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 2 replies
    • 2024 Genesis Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #3
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #4
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Rory McIlroy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Sepp Straka - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Patrick Rodgers - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Brendon Todd - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Denny McCarthy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Corey Conners - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Chase Johnson - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tommy Fleetwood - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Matt Fitzpatrick - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Si Woo Kim - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Viktor Hovland - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Wyndham Clark - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Cam Davis - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Nick Taylor - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Ben Baller WITB update (New putter, driver, hybrid and shafts) – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Vortex Golf rangefinder - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Fujikura Ventus shaft - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods & TaylorMade "Sun Day Red" apparel launch event, product photos – 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods Sun Day Red golf shoes - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Aretera shafts - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Toulon putters - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods' new white "Sun Day Red" golf shoe prototypes – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      • 22 replies

×
×
  • Create New...