Jump to content
2024 Houston Open WITB Photos ×

Red shirting


TigerMom

Recommended Posts

I heard some parents talk about holding back their kid or starting Kindergarten a year late

 

They called it red shirting

 

They said it would definitely give kids an advantage in sports in high school

 

Kids will be bigger and stronger being up to a year older

 

No real impact on academics

 

Would it make a big difference in golf too?

 

What do you think?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

In my area it’s not so much for an athletic advantage but rather for an academic. The academic expectations going into kindergarten are much higher now than ever. If your kid can’t read (or at least recognize 100 sight words) you are gonna be behind. Have to know shapes, colors.... The majority of kids in my 9yo’s grade are at least a year older than him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See this all the time. For Golf though you go by age so it more about the timing of the tournament around their birthday then school year. It's really only a factor when there younger. For instance if you are competing in US Kids Worlds and your birthday is September or Late August your at a huge advantage over a kid born in June or July. So if your kid is under 10 you need to consider that in your expectations as it will have a huge impact since they could actually be a lot younger then the older competitors.

 

 

I also think for boys this tends to a bigger deal then girls at a later age. At the end of the day all things even out as they get older and the kid who was winning because he simply was older will suddenly have a hard time winning if they never develop the same talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking from a strictly academic standpoint, I'm not sure that advantage plays out by the time they graduate school. As always seems to be the case, some studies show a benefit while others do not.

 

You have to consider confounding factors. Families that redshirt tend to be more affluent. Affluence alone provides other advantages in academic performance. Lower income families, which are already at risk for lower academic performance, tend to send their kids to school as early as possible, since it is expensive to pay for child care for another year. This difference alone could account for the early academic advantages. The fact that a parent is considering holding their child back to increase their academic outcomes shows that the parent is interested in this outcome, thus is more likely to provide other resources to improve their performance.

 

Delaying children's school entry linked to poor academic performance.

 

I think one of the more comprehensive articles on the topic is this one: Redshirting may do more harm than good...

"In his analysis, Gladwell overstates the benefits of redshirting to some degree. In fact, a balanced look at the research suggests that while children derive a short-term gain from being redshirted, that advantage dissipates quickly over time."

 

"Consistent with this evidence, the research on relative age indicates that being among the youngest in the class has benefits, in both the short and long term. Why? Because older classmates tend to be higher achieving and better behaved. They model positive behavior, and the younger students achieve greater academic gains from learning and competing with older ones."

 

I think that's the most interesting part. We can all agree that to become the best we should play against the best competition. Shouldn't it be the same with academic challenges?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My son has a late Birthday and one of the youngest kids in his class. When he played at World's he was one of the youngest kids there. We have had the discussion about holding him back this year as an 8th grader because he is immature, but at the end of the day I know it won't do anything for him. He makes straight A's in Honors classes. Took Algebra in 7th and made an A with the high EOC score in the county. Taking Geometry Honors this year as an 8th grader and makes A's on everything. As a golfer he has always competed against the older kids. When going to World's he was always one of the youngest competing and did just fine. When competing locally I always moved him up to compete against the older kids. It is nothing new to him. If he were on his high school golf team this year, who advanced to play in the state championship, he would have played 3 or 4 despite driving the ball 30-40 yards less than the other kids on the team.

 

If I were to hold him back it would be for me, not him. He will grow up and be just fine in whatever he decides to do in life.

 

Studies have shown that holding kids back for athletic reasons does not work.

I am GenX.  If you really think I care about what you have to say, I don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See this all the time. For Golf though you go by age so it more about the timing of the tournament around their birthday then school year. It's really only a factor when there younger. For instance if you are competing in US Kids Worlds and your birthday is September or Late August your at a huge advantage over a kid born in June or July. So if your kid is under 10 you need to consider that in your expectations as it will have a huge impact since they could actually be a lot younger then the older competitors.

 

 

I also think for boys this tends to a bigger deal then girls at a later age. At the end of the day all things even out as they get older and the kid who was winning because he simply was older will suddenly have a hard time winning if they never develop the same talent.

 

But by the time high school they not grouping by ages for golf anymore?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See this all the time. For Golf though you go by age so it more about the timing of the tournament around their birthday then school year. It's really only a factor when there younger. For instance if you are competing in US Kids Worlds and your birthday is September or Late August your at a huge advantage over a kid born in June or July. So if your kid is under 10 you need to consider that in your expectations as it will have a huge impact since they could actually be a lot younger then the older competitors.

 

 

I also think for boys this tends to a bigger deal then girls at a later age. At the end of the day all things even out as they get older and the kid who was winning because he simply was older will suddenly have a hard time winning if they never develop the same talent.

 

But by the time high school they not grouping by ages for golf anymore?

 

No they don't. They compete in age groups. AJGA plays them 12-18. Hurricane is 11-13 then 14-18. SFPGA here is 13-18. FJT is 13-15 and 16-18.

I am GenX.  If you really think I care about what you have to say, I don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See this all the time. For Golf though you go by age so it more about the timing of the tournament around their birthday then school year. It's really only a factor when there younger. For instance if you are competing in US Kids Worlds and your birthday is September or Late August your at a huge advantage over a kid born in June or July. So if your kid is under 10 you need to consider that in your expectations as it will have a huge impact since they could actually be a lot younger then the older competitors.

 

 

I also think for boys this tends to a bigger deal then girls at a later age. At the end of the day all things even out as they get older and the kid who was winning because he simply was older will suddenly have a hard time winning if they never develop the same talent.

 

But by the time high school they not grouping by ages for golf anymore?

 

No they don't. They compete in age groups. AJGA plays them 12-18. Hurricane is 11-13 then 14-18. SFPGA here is 13-18. FJT is 13-15 and 16-18.

 

Do college golf coaches care about age of player?

 

If not, then seems like being older for a graduating class can give an advantage to be recruited for golf?

 

Also if college golf coaches recruiting younger and younger then being a year older could be a big difference?

 

Tennis has 12/14/16/18 and younger age divisions, so there doesn't seem to be as much benefit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See this all the time. For Golf though you go by age so it more about the timing of the tournament around their birthday then school year. It's really only a factor when there younger. For instance if you are competing in US Kids Worlds and your birthday is September or Late August your at a huge advantage over a kid born in June or July. So if your kid is under 10 you need to consider that in your expectations as it will have a huge impact since they could actually be a lot younger then the older competitors.

 

 

I also think for boys this tends to a bigger deal then girls at a later age. At the end of the day all things even out as they get older and the kid who was winning because he simply was older will suddenly have a hard time winning if they never develop the same talent.

 

But by the time high school they not grouping by ages for golf anymore?

 

No they don't. They compete in age groups. AJGA plays them 12-18. Hurricane is 11-13 then 14-18. SFPGA here is 13-18. FJT is 13-15 and 16-18.

 

Do college golf coaches care about age of player?

 

If not, then seems like being older for a graduating class can give an advantage to be recruited for golf?

 

Also if college golf coaches recruiting younger and younger then being a year older could be a big difference?

 

Tennis has 12/14/16/18 and younger age divisions, so there doesn't seem to be as much benefit

 

Age doesn't matter. My daughter didn't start playing golf until she was 12 close to 13. She graduated high school when she was 17. She plays D1 college golf.

I am GenX.  If you really think I care about what you have to say, I don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You also should not look at Golf like Football. There is a big difference there because Football is a school sport and the best players all play in schools that support them. A lot team sports are like that. Golf, Tennis is where the individual is the one who determines what tournaments to play and do not even need to be in school to participate.

 

With golf the best players don't always play on a high school team so holding back a kid is not helping them play golf better. Plus some of the best players in the game didn't pick up a club until there teenagers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

With golf the best players don't always play on a high school team so holding back a kid is not helping them play golf better. Plus some of the best players in the game didn't pick up a club until there teenagers.

 

There are a lot of great high school golfers in South Florida playing high school golf. There has been a huge shift over the past several years in that many of the great players are playing.

I am GenX.  If you really think I care about what you have to say, I don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You also should not look at Golf like Football. There is a big difference there because Football is a school sport and the best players all play in schools that support them. A lot team sports are like that. Golf, Tennis is where the individual is the one who determines what tournaments to play and do not even need to be in school to participate.

 

With golf the best players don't always play on a high school team so holding back a kid is not helping them play golf better. Plus some of the best players in the game didn't pick up a club until there teenagers.

 

I agree about team sports played in high school

 

But college golf coach is recruiting based on graduating class?

 

And if there are not tighter age groupings in competitions outside of school then seems like being older is advantage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You also should not look at Golf like Football. There is a big difference there because Football is a school sport and the best players all play in schools that support them. A lot team sports are like that. Golf, Tennis is where the individual is the one who determines what tournaments to play and do not even need to be in school to participate.

 

With golf the best players don't always play on a high school team so holding back a kid is not helping them play golf better. Plus some of the best players in the game didn't pick up a club until there teenagers.

 

I agree about team sports played in high school

 

But college coach is recruiting based on graduating class

 

And if there are not tighter age groupings in competitions outside of school then seems like being older is advantage

 

It isn't an advantage at all. Alexa Pano is winning tournaments all over the country playing UP in older divisions. The Luke Clantons of the world on the boy's side are doing the same thing. You are either good or you are not.

 

School isn't tight age divisions either. 14-18 year olds.

 

College coaches will start making lists of who to look for when kids are in 7th/8th grade. As they progress the list will get shorter. They always will make room for that kid that develops later. Age has nothing to do with recruiting. Kids are recruited that never win. Kids go to great colleges and have never won an event. It is the body of work that the colleges look at. Most kids don't go to college and play their first year to begin with unless they are the best of the best. Even then, great players will ride the pine. Garrett Barber was sought after by everyone last year. He went to LSU and he played in only 2 events this fall.

I am GenX.  If you really think I care about what you have to say, I don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You also should not look at Golf like Football. There is a big difference there because Football is a school sport and the best players all play in schools that support them. A lot team sports are like that. Golf, Tennis is where the individual is the one who determines what tournaments to play and do not even need to be in school to participate.

 

With golf the best players don't always play on a high school team so holding back a kid is not helping them play golf better. Plus some of the best players in the game didn't pick up a club until there teenagers.

 

I agree about team sports played in high school

 

But college coach is recruiting based on graduating class

 

And if there are not tighter age groupings in competitions outside of school then seems like being older is advantage

 

It isn't an advantage at all. Alexa Pano is winning tournaments all over the country playing UP in older divisions. The Luke Clantons of the world on the boy's side are doing the same thing. You are either good or you are not.

 

School isn't tight age divisions either. 14-18 year olds.

 

College coaches will start making lists of who to look for when kids are in 7th/8th grade. As they progress the list will get shorter. They always will make room for that kid that develops later. Age has nothing to do with recruiting. Kids are recruited that never win. Kids go to great colleges and have never won an event. It is the body of work that the colleges look at. Most kids don't go to college and play their first year to begin with unless they are the best of the best. Even then, great players will ride the pine. Garrett Barber was sought after by everyone last year. He went to LSU and he played in only 2 events this fall.

 

Ok I think I understand what you are saying

 

But I have a question about how rankings work

 

If your child moved to the class below her would her ranking improve?

 

Say if you are #200 in class of 2024, if she were to switch to class of 2025 with exact same scores and tournament finishes she wouldn't stay same rank, but probably have better maybe #150?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I teach in an elementary school and it is a huge advantage academically for the kids who are the older ones in each grade. Especially K-2. I can spot right away the ones who barely made the birthday cutoff and they are almost always behind the average students.

 

This is the exact reason my wife and I chose to keep our son back. He has a June 10th birthday with cut off being August 1st, I would rather him be the oldest vs the youngest. We are faced with another year of daycare expenses, but that is irrelevant in comparison to his education and development early on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You also should not look at Golf like Football. There is a big difference there because Football is a school sport and the best players all play in schools that support them. A lot team sports are like that. Golf, Tennis is where the individual is the one who determines what tournaments to play and do not even need to be in school to participate.

 

With golf the best players don't always play on a high school team so holding back a kid is not helping them play golf better. Plus some of the best players in the game didn't pick up a club until there teenagers.

 

I agree about team sports played in high school

 

But college coach is recruiting based on graduating class

 

And if there are not tighter age groupings in competitions outside of school then seems like being older is advantage

 

It isn't an advantage at all. Alexa Pano is winning tournaments all over the country playing UP in older divisions. The Luke Clantons of the world on the boy's side are doing the same thing. You are either good or you are not.

 

School isn't tight age divisions either. 14-18 year olds.

 

College coaches will start making lists of who to look for when kids are in 7th/8th grade. As they progress the list will get shorter. They always will make room for that kid that develops later. Age has nothing to do with recruiting. Kids are recruited that never win. Kids go to great colleges and have never won an event. It is the body of work that the colleges look at. Most kids don't go to college and play their first year to begin with unless they are the best of the best. Even then, great players will ride the pine. Garrett Barber was sought after by everyone last year. He went to LSU and he played in only 2 events this fall.

 

Ok I think I understand what you are saying

 

But I have a question about how rankings work

 

If your child moved to the class below her would her ranking improve?

 

Say if you are #200 in class of 2024, if she were to switch to class of 2025 with exact same scores and tournament finishes she wouldn't stay same rank, but probably have better maybe #150?

 

It is true, but is more relevant when they are younger than when they get older. If I held my kid back he would jump 20 spots in our state. I expect him to make that jump within the year in the class he is in now anyway. Right now he is in a no mans land because of his age being relative to everyone else in his class. When it is relative it won't matter if it is this year or last year.

 

You need to have a good understanding of the ranking system to understand what I am saying.

I am GenX.  If you really think I care about what you have to say, I don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You also should not look at Golf like Football. There is a big difference there because Football is a school sport and the best players all play in schools that support them. A lot team sports are like that. Golf, Tennis is where the individual is the one who determines what tournaments to play and do not even need to be in school to participate.

 

With golf the best players don't always play on a high school team so holding back a kid is not helping them play golf better. Plus some of the best players in the game didn't pick up a club until there teenagers.

 

I agree about team sports played in high school

 

But college coach is recruiting based on graduating class

 

And if there are not tighter age groupings in competitions outside of school then seems like being older is advantage

 

It isn't an advantage at all. Alexa Pano is winning tournaments all over the country playing UP in older divisions. The Luke Clantons of the world on the boy's side are doing the same thing. You are either good or you are not.

 

School isn't tight age divisions either. 14-18 year olds.

 

College coaches will start making lists of who to look for when kids are in 7th/8th grade. As they progress the list will get shorter. They always will make room for that kid that develops later. Age has nothing to do with recruiting. Kids are recruited that never win. Kids go to great colleges and have never won an event. It is the body of work that the colleges look at. Most kids don't go to college and play their first year to begin with unless they are the best of the best. Even then, great players will ride the pine. Garrett Barber was sought after by everyone last year. He went to LSU and he played in only 2 events this fall.

 

Ok I think I understand what you are saying

 

But I have a question about how rankings work

 

If your child moved to the class below her would her ranking improve?

 

Say if you are #200 in class of 2024, if she were to switch to class of 2025 with exact same scores and tournament finishes she wouldn't stay same rank, but probably have better maybe #150?

 

It is true, but is more relevant when they are younger than when they get older. If I held my kid back he would jump 20 spots in our state. I expect him to make that jump within the year in the class he is in now anyway. Right now he is in a no mans land because of his age being relative to everyone else in his class. When it is relative it won't matter if it is this year or last year.

 

You need to have a good understanding of the ranking system to understand what I am saying.

 

So true Very much relevant when they are younger not so much when they get older. My youngest is 7 so a year can make a huge difference if were talking about winning tournaments. When there younger everyone knows this that is why no one cares about those tournaments when the get older.

 

Age is a lot less of a factor when they get older. My older daughter is 11 and the course she plays are short for her because many times she can't use a driver off the tee. Maturity is a big thing at this age and I believe the biggest thing holder her back . Having said that in a year or two when she is 13 I don't see her having a problem competing with 18 year olds. In a lot case I think it will help since she is so far off the tee driving and may actually do better. In fact I think this is the case for a lot kids who hit long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I don't really understand

 

I thought junior golfers are improving a lot each year, even in high school

 

Even the really good ones

 

If not, then would think college coaches just sign recruits really early, around when the improvement stops or dramatically slows?

 

Doesn't make sense to me that there is no difference between a 18-19 year old vs 17-18 (around age when most commit to college)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I don't really understand

 

I thought junior golfers are improving a lot each year, even in high school

 

Even the really good ones

 

If not, then would think college coaches just sign recruits really early, around when the improvement stops or dramatically slows?

 

Doesn't make sense to me that there is no difference between a 18-19 year old vs 17-18 (around age when most commit to college)

 

There are rules. Here's a good rundown: https://www.ajga.org/parents/collegegolf.asp

 

As far as difference, it depends on the player. For the outliers (think Tiger), they were beating older kids when they were 2,3,4,5 years younger than them.

It's no fun when the rabbit's got the gun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I don't really understand

 

I thought junior golfers are improving a lot each year, even in high school

 

Even the really good ones

 

If not, then would think college coaches just sign recruits really early, around when the improvement stops or dramatically slows?

 

Doesn't make sense to me that there is no difference between a 18-19 year old vs 17-18 (around age when most commit to college)

 

They don't officially commit until junior year so yes lots can happen. The problem is by the time they are Juniors everyone else wants them too. The solution is to get kids to commit early to the program. Verbal Commitments mean nothing but if they want someone bad enough they know they need to reach out sooner then later to get them.

 

I also think programs who want to rise in ranks will be more aggressive then better schools who kids naturally gravitate towards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I don't really understand

 

I thought junior golfers are improving a lot each year, even in high school

 

Even the really good ones

 

If not, then would think college coaches just sign recruits really early, around when the improvement stops or dramatically slows?

 

Doesn't make sense to me that there is no difference between a 18-19 year old vs 17-18 (around age when most commit to college)

 

There are rules. Here's a good rundown: https://www.ajga.org/parents/collegegolf.asp

 

As far as difference, it depends on the player. For the outliers (think Tiger), they were beating older kids when they were 2,3,4,5 years younger than them.

 

Just because a good player can beat someone older doesn't mean they won't be an even better player a year later

 

Even Tiger Woods was a better player at 19 vs 18 and 18 vs 17 and 17 vs 16

 

What do instructors think about this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Just because a good player can beat someone older doesn't mean they won't be an even better player a year later

 

 

 

See inverse: Just because a good player at 17 beat a 15 year old doesn't mean that the 17 year old now turned 18 will beat the now turned 16 year old next year.

It's no fun when the rabbit's got the gun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because a good player can beat someone older doesn't mean they won't be an even better player a year later

 

 

 

See inverse: Just because a good player at 17 beat a 15 year old doesn't mean that the 17 year old now turned 18 will beat the now turned 16 year old next year.

 

I don't understand why that would be relevant

 

you only need to commit to college once (hopefully)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because a good player can beat someone older doesn't mean they won't be an even better player a year later

 

 

 

See inverse: Just because a good player at 17 beat a 15 year old doesn't mean that the 17 year old now turned 18 will beat the now turned 16 year old next year.

 

I don't understand why that would be relevant

 

you only need to commit to college once (hopefully)

 

Thats why rankings change over time. Recruiting at best is a guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wished I had been red shirted. Not for sports or anything. It’s just all the girls were always taller than me until my senior year in high school. Lol.

Walter: Tell me Bobby, why do you play this game?
Bobby: I play because I love it.
Walter: Well I play for the money. I have to win. That is why every time we face each other I will always beat you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because a good player can beat someone older doesn't mean they won't be an even better player a year later

 

 

 

See inverse: Just because a good player at 17 beat a 15 year old doesn't mean that the 17 year old now turned 18 will beat the now turned 16 year old next year.

 

I don't understand why that would be relevant

 

you only need to commit to college once (hopefully)

 

A verbal commitment to the college isn’t a legal document. That commitment when time comes doesn’t have to be honored by the school. If you don’t perform they will not offer you money.

I am GenX.  If you really think I care about what you have to say, I don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Discussion and links to Photos
      Please put any questions or Comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Monday #1
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Monday #2
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #1
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #2
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #3
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Thorbjorn Olesen - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Ben Silverman - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jesse Droemer - SoTX PGA Section POY - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      David Lipsky - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Martin Trainer - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Zac Blair - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jacob Bridgeman - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Trace Crowe - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jimmy Walker - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Daniel Berger - WITB(very mini) - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Chesson Hadley - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Callum McNeill - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Rhein Gibson - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Patrick Fishburn - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Peter Malnati - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Raul Pereda - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Gary Woodland WITB (New driver, iron shafts) – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Padraig Harrington WITB – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      Tom Hoge's custom Cameron - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Piretti putters - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Ping putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Kevin Dougherty's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Bettinardi putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Erik Barnes testing an all-black Axis1 putter – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Tony Finau's new driver shaft – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
       
       
       
       
       
      • 7 replies
    • 2024 Valspar Championship WITB Photos (Thanks to bvmagic)- Discussion & Links to Photos
      This weeks WITB Pics are from member bvmagic (Brian). Brian's first event for WRX was in 2008 at Bayhill while in college. Thanks so much bv.
       
      Please put your comments or question on this thread. Links to all the threads are below...
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 31 replies
    • 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #3
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Matt (LFG) Every - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Sahith Theegala - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Cameron putters (and new "LD" grip) - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Bettinardi MB & CB irons - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Bettinardi API putter cover - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Swag API covers - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Golf Pride Reverse Taper grips - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 15 replies
    • 2024 Cognizant Classic - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #1
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #2
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #3
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #4
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Brandt Snedeker - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Max Greyserman - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Eric Cole - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Carl Yuan - WITb - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Russell Henley - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Justin Sun - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alex Noren - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Shane Lowry - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Taylor Montgomery - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jake Knapp (KnappTime_ltd) - WITB - - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Super Stoke Pistol Lock 1.0 & 2.0 grips - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      LA Golf new insert putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Garsen Quad Tour 15 grip - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Swag covers - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jacob Bridgeman's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Bud Cauley's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Ryo Hisatsune's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Chris Kirk - new black Callaway Apex CB irons and a few Odyssey putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alejandro Tosti's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 2 replies
    • 2024 Genesis Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #3
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #4
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Rory McIlroy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Sepp Straka - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Patrick Rodgers - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Brendon Todd - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Denny McCarthy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Corey Conners - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Chase Johnson - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tommy Fleetwood - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Matt Fitzpatrick - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Si Woo Kim - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Viktor Hovland - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Wyndham Clark - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Cam Davis - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Nick Taylor - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Ben Baller WITB update (New putter, driver, hybrid and shafts) – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Vortex Golf rangefinder - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Fujikura Ventus shaft - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods & TaylorMade "Sun Day Red" apparel launch event, product photos – 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods Sun Day Red golf shoes - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Aretera shafts - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Toulon putters - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods' new white "Sun Day Red" golf shoe prototypes – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      • 22 replies

×
×
  • Create New...