Jump to content
2024 Houston Open WITB Photos ×

Putting with flag in (MERGED)


3chavgolf

Recommended Posts

I realize WRX is in general a US website. We certainly have some posts from across the pond but mostly we are from the US. That said-why is it always the USGA's fault? Why is this not considered an R&A clown show?

Titleist TSR4 9° Tensei AV White 65

Titleist TSi3 strong 3w 13.5° Tensei AV White 70

Titleist TS3 19°  hybrid Tensei Blue/Titleist TSR3 24° Diamana Ahina

Titleist T150 5-pw Nippon Pro Modus 125

Vokey SM8 50° F & 56° M SM9 60°M

Cameron Newport w/ flow neck by Lamont/ Cameron Del Mar

 



 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 361
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I realize WRX is in general a US website. We certainly have some posts from across the pond but mostly we are from the US. That said-why is it always the USGA's fault? Why is this not considered an R&A clown show?

 

I truly believe that if the RandA ran it all the game and its players would be better served.

 

We’d get a handicap system based off real comps and no self posting .... and the “ how can we get more drunks away from football and onto a golf course “ tactics would stop. The game should be grown organically from kid level up. It will only get so big without bastardizing it. When you start making it easier to play you’re well on your way.

 

If what we got was a compromise ( as it’s been reported ) between the USga and the r and a , I know who’s thoughts id have voted for.

Callaway epic max LS 9* GD-M9003 7x 

TM Sim2 max tour  16* GD  ADHD 8x 

srixon zx 19* elements 9F5T 

Cobra king SZ 25.5* KBS TD cat 5 70 

TM p7mc 5-pw Mmt125tx 

Mizuno T22 raw 52-56-60 s400

LAB Mezz Max armlock 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realize WRX is in general a US website. We certainly have some posts from across the pond but mostly we are from the US. That said-why is it always the USGA's fault? Why is this not considered an R&A clown show?

 

Unlike the USGA, once per year the R&A manages to successfully stage their biggest event without stepping all over their own d*cjs. Thus they get the benefit of the doubt.

 

Also the USGA has an annual income of ~$200m while the R&A is at about us$75m, so you can guess who’s driving the car there.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realize WRX is in general a US website. We certainly have some posts from across the pond but mostly we are from the US. That said-why is it always the USGA's fault? Why is this not considered an R&A clown show?

 

Unlike the USGA, once per year the R&A manages to successfully stage their biggest event without stepping all over their own d*cjs. Thus they get the benefit of the doubt.

 

Also the USGA has an annual income of ~$200m while the R&A is at about us$75m, so you can guess who’s driving the car there.

I probably phrased my post poorly but I was referring to the rules changes only. A collaboration but all of the blame and vitriol is directed at the USGA.

Titleist TSR4 9° Tensei AV White 65

Titleist TSi3 strong 3w 13.5° Tensei AV White 70

Titleist TS3 19°  hybrid Tensei Blue/Titleist TSR3 24° Diamana Ahina

Titleist T150 5-pw Nippon Pro Modus 125

Vokey SM8 50° F & 56° M SM9 60°M

Cameron Newport w/ flow neck by Lamont/ Cameron Del Mar

 



 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realize WRX is in general a US website. We certainly have some posts from across the pond but mostly we are from the US. That said-why is it always the USGA's fault? Why is this not considered an R&A clown show?

 

Unlike the USGA, once per year the R&A manages to successfully stage their biggest event without stepping all over their own d*cjs. Thus they get the benefit of the doubt.

 

Also the USGA has an annual income of ~$200m while the R&A is at about us$75m, so you can guess who's driving the car there.

I probably phrased my post poorly but I was referring to the rules changes only. A collaboration but all of the blame and vitriol is directed at the USGA.

 

To be honest, about the only time I ever think of the R&A is when the British Open is being played. But I'm an American.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realize WRX is in general a US website. We certainly have some posts from across the pond but mostly we are from the US. That said-why is it always the USGA's fault? Why is this not considered an R&A clown show?

 

Unlike the USGA, once per year the R&A manages to successfully stage their biggest event without stepping all over their own d*cjs. Thus they get the benefit of the doubt.

 

Also the USGA has an annual income of ~$200m while the R&A is at about us$75m, so you can guess who's driving the car there.

I probably phrased my post poorly but I was referring to the rules changes only. A collaboration but all of the blame and vitriol is directed at the USGA.

Perhaps most of our friends who live in the areas governed by the R&A are more tolerant of differing opinions than we are in the USGA areas. Perhaps the USGA-governed folks are more prone to hyperbole, exaggerating the impact of the rule, or the changes, and condemning the organization rather than recognizing a simple disagreement. To me, their management of a a single highly visible tournament a year is a separate issue from maintaining and revising the rules that govern play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realize WRX is in general a US website. We certainly have some posts from across the pond but mostly we are from the US. That said-why is it always the USGA's fault? Why is this not considered an R&A clown show?

 

Unlike the USGA, once per year the R&A manages to successfully stage their biggest event without stepping all over their own d*cjs. Thus they get the benefit of the doubt.

 

Also the USGA has an annual income of ~$200m while the R&A is at about us$75m, so you can guess who's driving the car there.

I probably phrased my post poorly but I was referring to the rules changes only. A collaboration but all of the blame and vitriol is directed at the USGA.

 

I think they are equally to blame. That being said I agree with an above poster who said they think the game would be better run if the USGA died and the R&A ran everything. There are some exceptions to this, as I don't think the elite running the R&A are as open to diversity as those in the US. But as far as the rules and direction of the game I think the R&A is better than the USGA.

 

But since it was a joint effort I'm ok splitting the blame between the 2 of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I think they are equally to blame. That being said I agree with an above poster who said they think the game would be better run if the USGA died and the R&A ran everything. There are some exceptions to this, as I don't think the elite running the R&A are as open to diversity as those in the US. But as far as the rules and direction of the game I think the R&A is better than the USGA.

 

But since it was a joint effort I'm ok splitting the blame between the 2 of them.

I can't agree or disagree with you, as I simply can't separate the two, so I ask why do make that differentiation? Outside of a couple of three-steps-removed quotes, do you have any press releases or interviews that really show differences between the two?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we see guys hammering 5 footers into the flagstick this year on the PGA Tour, let me know if you're still okay with it.

 

It might not be a bad thing, but it will certainly change the game.

We'll see. The problem with "hammering 5-footers" is that even the best players miss. If you miss a putt you're trying to hammer, you're going to have another 5-footer, and that one is missable too. In my opinion, most players will continue to try to get the speed about right, to minimize those lengthy come-backers.

 

Okay, but I bet we see some guys who aren't very good putters trying this. Probably more so on 3-4 footers.

 

Either way, how (some) pros putt is almost certainly going to be affected.

 

And why? To potentially speed up play a little?

 

Was it worth changing putting!?

 

I don't think it will last. I don't think the USGA understood the potential ramifications when they proposed this change. I think we will eventually see flagsticks that are not receptive or a retraction of the rule change.

 

If someone is a bad putter, they're not going to be able to strike the ball well enough to make a straight putt that will consistently hit the pin. Doesn't matter if it's three feet or thirty-three.

PING G400 Max 10.5° (+)
PING G430 fairway 18° (F-)
PING G430 hybrid 22°, 26° (F-)
Irons tbd
PING s159 53W, 58B
PING Serene B60
Maxfli Tour yellow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we see guys hammering 5 footers into the flagstick this year on the PGA Tour, let me know if you're still okay with it.

 

It might not be a bad thing, but it will certainly change the game.

We'll see. The problem with "hammering 5-footers" is that even the best players miss. If you miss a putt you're trying to hammer, you're going to have another 5-footer, and that one is missable too. In my opinion, most players will continue to try to get the speed about right, to minimize those lengthy come-backers.

 

Okay, but I bet we see some guys who aren't very good putters trying this. Probably more so on 3-4 footers.

 

Either way, how (some) pros putt is almost certainly going to be affected.

 

And why? To potentially speed up play a little?

 

Was it worth changing putting!?

 

I don't think it will last. I don't think the USGA understood the potential ramifications when they proposed this change. I think we will eventually see flagsticks that are not receptive or a retraction of the rule change.

 

If someone is a bad putter, they're not going to be able to strike the ball well enough to make a straight putt that will consistently hit the pin. Doesn't matter if it's three feet or thirty-three.

 

I've seen some of the best putters on tour completely miss the hole from under 5 feet, heck, even 2 feet on rare occasions. To think anyone is going to add more pace to a short putt knowing that they'll hit a thin stick is delusional.

Driver: PING G425 LST/Callaway Epic Speed LS
3 wood: Taylormade mini 300
2 Hybrid Callaway Maverick

4 Hybrid Taylormade Superfast

5-UW: Ping i210
Maltby TSW sand wedge

Odyssey OG 2 Ball stroke lab
Titleist ProV1 left dash/Snell MTB-X/Vice Pro Plus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I've seen some of the best putters on tour completely miss the hole from under 5 feet, heck, even 2 feet on rare occasions. To think anyone is going to add more pace to a short putt knowing that they'll hit a thin stick is delusional.

Oh, I'm absolutely certain that some players will try to do that. Its not delusional on my part for thinking they'll do it, its delusional on their part to think that they're good enough to make it pay off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we see guys hammering 5 footers into the flagstick this year on the PGA Tour, let me know if you're still okay with it.

 

It might not be a bad thing, but it will certainly change the game.

We'll see. The problem with "hammering 5-footers" is that even the best players miss. If you miss a putt you're trying to hammer, you're going to have another 5-footer, and that one is missable too. In my opinion, most players will continue to try to get the speed about right, to minimize those lengthy come-backers.

 

Okay, but I bet we see some guys who aren't very good putters trying this. Probably more so on 3-4 footers.

 

Either way, how (some) pros putt is almost certainly going to be affected.

 

And why? To potentially speed up play a little?

 

Was it worth changing putting!?

 

I don't think it will last. I don't think the USGA understood the potential ramifications when they proposed this change. I think we will eventually see flagsticks that are not receptive or a retraction of the rule change.

 

If someone is a bad putter, they're not going to be able to strike the ball well enough to make a straight putt that will consistently hit the pin. Doesn't matter if it's three feet or thirty-three.

 

I've seen some of the best putters on tour completely miss the hole from under 5 feet, heck, even 2 feet on rare occasions. To think anyone is going to add more pace to a short putt knowing that they'll hit a thin stick is delusional.

 

Why is it delusional? You failed to explain that part.

 

It is delusional to think there will not be times when guys are less fearful on downhill 4-5 footers, knowing they have the flagstick there.

 

We may see guys experiment with hitting putts firmer then they normally would, yes. And having the flagstick in will undoubtedly affect the psyche of some/most putters.

 

I don't think that the USGA foresaw those effects.

 

If you don't think the flagstick affects people at all, then okay. But ask anyone from PGA Tour players to recreational golfers and they will almost all tell you that it does (mostly mentally).

 

Maybe my examples weren't the best, but I guarantee we see at least one putt miss this year because of the flagstick. And we will see at least one putt made, only because of the flagstick. So, it will affect scores and potentially the way people putt (as mentioned above). Whereas I think the USGA only intended for it to simplify the rules and speed up play.

 

Dave Pelz already did a pretty scientific look at it and found "You will hole a higher percentage of putts when you leave the flagstick in." https://www.golf.com...ule-change-2018

 

So, as I said before, the rule essentially changes putting and potentially scoring. That's a big deal in the long run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they are equally to blame. That being said I agree with an above poster who said they think the game would be better run if the USGA died and the R&A ran everything. There are some exceptions to this, as I don't think the elite running the R&A are as open to diversity as those in the US. But as far as the rules and direction of the game I think the R&A is better than the USGA.

 

But since it was a joint effort I'm ok splitting the blame between the 2 of them.

I can't agree or disagree with you, as I simply can't separate the two, so I ask why do make that differentiation? Outside of a couple of three-steps-removed quotes, do you have any press releases or interviews that really show differences between the two?

 

Good point. I really can't tell a difference between them. So they both suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had both positive and negative reactions to the flagstick being in over the weekend. I caught myself this weekend hitting a downhill putt much harder than I should have/would have and I realized afterwards that it absolutely had something to do with the stick being in. I subconsciously thought the flag would slow it down if it was too fast....how arrogant to think I was going to hit the stick for sure!

 

Thankfully made the putt coming back though :)

Cobra LTDx LS (10.5°)

Titleist TS2 (15°)

TaylorMade r9 (19°)

Cleveland 588 MB (4-PW)

Titleist Vokey SM8 (52° & 58°)

Odyssey Black #2m CS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've tried it on a few occasions now and my putting has gotten worse. Like way worse.

 

Me too man.

 

Again yesterday. Just garbage speed. Next round is pin out. We shall see.

Callaway epic max LS 9* GD-M9003 7x 

TM Sim2 max tour  16* GD  ADHD 8x 

srixon zx 19* elements 9F5T 

Cobra king SZ 25.5* KBS TD cat 5 70 

TM p7mc 5-pw Mmt125tx 

Mizuno T22 raw 52-56-60 s400

LAB Mezz Max armlock 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is it delusional? You failed to explain that part.

 

It is delusional to think there will not be times when guys are less fearful on downhill 4-5 footers, knowing they have the flagstick there.

 

We may see guys experiment with hitting putts firmer then they normally would, yes. And having the flagstick in will undoubtedly affect the psyche of some/most putters.

 

I don't think that the USGA foresaw those effects.

 

If you don't think the flagstick affects people at all, then okay. But ask anyone from PGA Tour players to recreational golfers and they will almost all tell you that it does (mostly mentally).

 

Maybe my examples weren't the best, but I guarantee we see at least one putt miss this year because of the flagstick. And we will see at least one putt made, only because of the flagstick. So, it will affect scores and potentially the way people putt (as mentioned above). Whereas I think the USGA only intended for it to simplify the rules and speed up play.

 

Dave Pelz already did a pretty scientific look at it and found "You will hole a higher percentage of putts when you leave the flagstick in." https://www.golf.com...ule-change-2018

 

So, as I said before, the rule essentially changes putting and potentially scoring. That's a big deal in the long run.

It is interesting that Pelz refers to his original study in this article. Wasn't the original about chipping? And tested rolls that would have gone 3, 6 and 9 feet by the hole? I am not sure that is the best test to cite for coming to a conclusion for putting where folks tend to have a bit better speed control than when chipping..

 

The correct link-the above did not work

https://www.golf.com...ule-change-2018

Titleist TSR4 9° Tensei AV White 65

Titleist TSi3 strong 3w 13.5° Tensei AV White 70

Titleist TS3 19°  hybrid Tensei Blue/Titleist TSR3 24° Diamana Ahina

Titleist T150 5-pw Nippon Pro Modus 125

Vokey SM8 50° F & 56° M SM9 60°M

Cameron Newport w/ flow neck by Lamont/ Cameron Del Mar

 



 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had both positive and negative reactions to the flagstick being in over the weekend. I caught myself this weekend hitting a downhill putt much harder than I should have/would have and I realized afterwards that it absolutely had something to do with the stick being in. I subconsciously thought the flag would slow it down if it was too fast....how arrogant to think I was going to hit the stick for sure!

 

Thankfully made the putt coming back though :)

Did you leave the flagstick in for the second one, the one you made?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had both positive and negative reactions to the flagstick being in over the weekend. I caught myself this weekend hitting a downhill putt much harder than I should have/would have and I realized afterwards that it absolutely had something to do with the stick being in. I subconsciously thought the flag would slow it down if it was too fast....how arrogant to think I was going to hit the stick for sure!

 

Thankfully made the putt coming back though :)

Did you leave the flagstick in for the second one, the one you made?

 

I did lol. I only pulled the flag about 3-4 times all day and it was mostly due to the stick leaning in a certain direction towards where the ball should go in.

Cobra LTDx LS (10.5°)

Titleist TS2 (15°)

TaylorMade r9 (19°)

Cleveland 588 MB (4-PW)

Titleist Vokey SM8 (52° & 58°)

Odyssey Black #2m CS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Curious to see how Tiger approaches this.

 

He's such a traditionalist I doubt he changes anything. Maybe he'll just leave it in rather than have it tended on really long putts, but I can't see him changing the way he approaches mid- to short-range ones like BAD is doing.

 

On a different note, did everyone see this this morning?

 

https://www.golfdigest.com/story/edoardo-molinari-conducts-pretty-scientific-puttingflagstick-experiment-and-the-results-may-surprise-you

 

190110-flagstick-charts.jpg

 

Seems to make a pretty good case that for soft putts it doesn't matter, for medium speed putts there's an advantage to having the stick out, and for harder putts there's an advantage to having it in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ how does a ball hit the back rim when the flag stick is in? I'm not sure I get these matrices. And they have a slot for "grazing the flag stick" when the stick is out? Not sure I'm understanding this test very well.

 

I saw one on recently where they used a stimpmeter ramp at say... 4 feet away. They got the ball moving fast enough so with the stick out, all the balls would ram into the rear of the cup, then bounce up and out. They did 5 or so in a row, all 5 did not hole out. Stuck the stick in... left everything the same, all 5 go in.

 

Obviosly won't matter if the ball just dives in slowly but I've seen a few different tests now showing that very firm putts that would risk hitting the back edge and bouncing out are saved by the stick being in some of the time.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Curious to see how Tiger approaches this.

 

He's such a traditionalist I doubt he changes anything. Maybe he'll just leave it in rather than have it tended on really long putts, but I can't see him changing the way he approaches mid- to short-range ones like BAD is doing.

 

On a different note, did everyone see this this morning?

 

https://www.golfdige...ay-surprise-you

 

190110-flagstick-charts.jpg

 

Seems to make a pretty good case that for soft putts it doesn't matter, for medium speed putts there's an advantage to having the stick out, and for harder putts there's an advantage to having it in.

The problem with a matrix like this is that most of us can't control the speed exactly enough to ensure one of these specific speeds. If we could, we'd always creep the ball over the front edge, that makes the effective width of the hole the greatest. And if we can consistently do that, the flagstick will make no difference. But we're not that good. Similarly, we can't control the line/read precisely enough to know whether we'll hit the center, craze the flag, or miss completely. Another thing not mentioned in that study is the distance remaining for putts that didn't go in. That's a part of the consideration, at least for me.But still, its good that people are looking at this in more detail. Data is good, interpretation of data is always a separate issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ how does a ball hit the back rim when the flag stick is in? I'm not sure I get these matrices. And they have a slot for "grazing the flag stick" when the stick is out? Not sure I'm understanding this test very well.

 

I saw one on recently where they used a stimpmeter ramp at say... 4 feet away. They got the ball moving fast enough so with the stick out, all the balls would ram into the rear of the cup, then bounce up and out. They did 5 or so in a row, all 5 did not hole out. Stuck the stick in... left everything the same, all 5 go in.

 

Obviosly won't matter if the ball just dives in slowly but I've seen a few different tests now showing that very firm putts that would risk hitting the back edge and bouncing out are saved by the stick being in some of the time.

 

It's just a way for describing the speed at which the ball is hit, with the variables being where it's aimed at whether the flag is in the hole or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Curious to see how Tiger approaches this.

 

He's such a traditionalist I doubt he changes anything. Maybe he'll just leave it in rather than have it tended on really long putts, but I can't see him changing the way he approaches mid- to short-range ones like BAD is doing.

 

On a different note, did everyone see this this morning?

 

https://www.golfdige...ay-surprise-you

 

190110-flagstick-charts.jpg

 

Seems to make a pretty good case that for soft putts it doesn't matter, for medium speed putts there's an advantage to having the stick out, and for harder putts there's an advantage to having it in.

The problem with a matrix like this is that most of us can't control the speed exactly enough to ensure one of these specific speeds. If we could, we'd always creep the ball over the front edge, that makes the effective width of the hole the greatest. And if we can consistently do that, the flagstick will make no difference. But we're not that good. Similarly, we can't control the line/read precisely enough to know whether we'll hit the center, craze the flag, or miss completely. Another thing not mentioned in that study is the distance remaining for putts that didn't go in. That's a part of the consideration, at least for me.But still, its good that people are looking at this in more detail. Data is good, interpretation of data is always a separate issue.

 

Fair points for sure. For example if putt A is a 6 footer that's slippery down a hill we're all trying to trickle it in the front, whereas if it's a 6 footer that's straight up a hill we're all trying to hit it harder than putt A. And that's in a world where we have better speed control than most of us do.

 

I think the chart above is trying to put the speed/flagstick data into more of a vacuum than we generally find in the real world, though I found it interesting nonetheless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dave Pelz also said that he’s heard that USGA insiders did not think that Tour players would be using the pin rule to their advantage. He also said that they did not take into consideration his 1990 test.

 

What an inept organization.

Ping G410 LST 10* (DI-6X)
Ping G410 3W 15.5* (DI-7X)
Ping i20 3-PW (DI-95X, PX 6.0)
Ping Glide 2.0 50*SS, 56*SS, 60*ES (PX 6.0)
Ping Vault Arna

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ how does a ball hit the back rim when the flag stick is in? I'm not sure I get these matrices. And they have a slot for "grazing the flag stick" when the stick is out? Not sure I'm understanding this test very well.

 

I saw one on recently where they used a stimpmeter ramp at say... 4 feet away. They got the ball moving fast enough so with the stick out, all the balls would ram into the rear of the cup, then bounce up and out. They did 5 or so in a row, all 5 did not hole out. Stuck the stick in... left everything the same, all 5 go in.

 

Obviosly won't matter if the ball just dives in slowly but I've seen a few different tests now showing that very firm putts that would risk hitting the back edge and bouncing out are saved by the stick being in some of the time.

 

It's just a way for describing the speed at which the ball is hit, with the variables being where it's aimed at whether the flag is in the hole or not.

okay I get that. I do find it odd that if it seems to be going a touch slower... the stick hurts, but faster and it helps? And it's quite a large difference, too.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Discussion and links to Photos
      Please put any questions or Comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Monday #1
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Monday #2
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #1
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #2
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #3
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Thorbjorn Olesen - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Ben Silverman - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jesse Droemer - SoTX PGA Section POY - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      David Lipsky - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Martin Trainer - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Zac Blair - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jacob Bridgeman - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Trace Crowe - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jimmy Walker - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Daniel Berger - WITB(very mini) - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Chesson Hadley - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Callum McNeill - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Rhein Gibson - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Patrick Fishburn - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Peter Malnati - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Raul Pereda - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Gary Woodland WITB (New driver, iron shafts) – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Padraig Harrington WITB – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      Tom Hoge's custom Cameron - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Piretti putters - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Ping putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Kevin Dougherty's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Bettinardi putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Erik Barnes testing an all-black Axis1 putter – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Tony Finau's new driver shaft – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
       
       
       
       
       
      • 7 replies
    • 2024 Valspar Championship WITB Photos (Thanks to bvmagic)- Discussion & Links to Photos
      This weeks WITB Pics are from member bvmagic (Brian). Brian's first event for WRX was in 2008 at Bayhill while in college. Thanks so much bv.
       
      Please put your comments or question on this thread. Links to all the threads are below...
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 31 replies
    • 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #3
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Matt (LFG) Every - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Sahith Theegala - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Cameron putters (and new "LD" grip) - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Bettinardi MB & CB irons - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Bettinardi API putter cover - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Swag API covers - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Golf Pride Reverse Taper grips - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 15 replies
    • 2024 Cognizant Classic - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #1
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #2
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #3
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #4
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Brandt Snedeker - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Max Greyserman - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Eric Cole - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Carl Yuan - WITb - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Russell Henley - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Justin Sun - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alex Noren - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Shane Lowry - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Taylor Montgomery - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jake Knapp (KnappTime_ltd) - WITB - - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Super Stoke Pistol Lock 1.0 & 2.0 grips - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      LA Golf new insert putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Garsen Quad Tour 15 grip - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Swag covers - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jacob Bridgeman's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Bud Cauley's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Ryo Hisatsune's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Chris Kirk - new black Callaway Apex CB irons and a few Odyssey putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alejandro Tosti's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 2 replies
    • 2024 Genesis Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #3
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #4
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Rory McIlroy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Sepp Straka - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Patrick Rodgers - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Brendon Todd - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Denny McCarthy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Corey Conners - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Chase Johnson - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tommy Fleetwood - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Matt Fitzpatrick - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Si Woo Kim - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Viktor Hovland - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Wyndham Clark - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Cam Davis - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Nick Taylor - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Ben Baller WITB update (New putter, driver, hybrid and shafts) – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Vortex Golf rangefinder - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Fujikura Ventus shaft - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods & TaylorMade "Sun Day Red" apparel launch event, product photos – 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods Sun Day Red golf shoes - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Aretera shafts - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Toulon putters - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods' new white "Sun Day Red" golf shoe prototypes – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      • 22 replies

×
×
  • Create New...