Jump to content

Jacobs 3D


Recommended Posts

Has the Jacobs, Manzella and Nesbitt team actually produced anything new yet?

[url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUz5cMht6OE"]I like to tee the ball up.. using man sized clubs.[/url]

[quote name='MonteScheinblum' timestamp='1496985379' post='15667418']
[quote name='mothman65' timestamp='1496984980' post='15667404']
Is Melbourne getting any closer to happening Momte?
[/quote]

Still need some more, but it's pretty likely I'll come. Just don't know when yet.
[/quote]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

iteach, FWP?

[url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUz5cMht6OE"]I like to tee the ball up.. using man sized clubs.[/url]

[quote name='MonteScheinblum' timestamp='1496985379' post='15667418']
[quote name='mothman65' timestamp='1496984980' post='15667404']
Is Melbourne getting any closer to happening Momte?
[/quote]

Still need some more, but it's pretty likely I'll come. Just don't know when yet.
[/quote]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't seen the latest edition of their stuff. I am not a fan of them personally and do not want to give them any money. What I have seen is that there is nothing really new. It's understanding better and being able to explain "why" to much of what we already saw in great swings.

 

 

You have to give them credit for pushing the science to the forefront Sasho and Kwon were among the first scientists who helped them and it was Manzella who started the whole lets see what the science shows of top players swings. I remember on his old forum he started it and all the TGM zealots went bananas, they still do.

 

Then they all went to face book groups and split up and now you have Sasho and Kwon in one corner and Nesbit and Jacobs and Manzella in the other corner.

 

Personally I think competing groups are better to find out more. And Mac O' didn't know what these guys know now contrary to what some may think!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

> @zztop said:

> Fort Worth Pro wrote:

>

>

>

> I haven't seen the latest edition of their stuff. I am not a fan of them personally and do not want to give them any money. What I have seen is that there is nothing really new. It's understanding better and being able to explain "why" to much of what we already saw in great swings.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> You have to give them credit for pushing the science to the forefront Sasho and Kwon were among the first scientists who helped them and it was Manzella who started the whole lets see what the science shows of top players swings. I remember on his old forum he started it and all the TGM zealots went bananas, they still do.

>

>

>

> Then they all went to face book groups and split up and now you have Sasho and Kwon in one corner and Nesbit and Jacobs and Manzella in the other corner.

>

>

>

> Personally I think competing groups are better to find out more. And Mac O' didn't know what these guys know now contrary to what some may think!

 

Mac discovered a lot of things that the researchers are ‘discovering’ today. That’s how the feud between myself and Finney/Manzella started…Mike Jacobs created a video on all of these discoveries they made while researching in the swing and when I mentioned that Mac had researched that years prior (and was backed up by John Dochety and Dana Dahlquist), they were apoplectic about it and started pulling all of these shenanigans.

 

Mac has paid researchers to research the golf swing. I know as I have corresponded with a few of them. His focus is on the neurobiology of the golf swing. Mackenzie, Kwon, Nesbit, etc. are focused on the biomechanics of the swing. Different means to an end and thus, different conclusions about the swing. What the neurobiology people discover and conclude may not jive with what the biomechanics people discover and conclude and vice versa.

 

But, there is plenty of crossover here. What the neurobiological research shows in areas of the swing does jive with the biomechanical approach and vice versa. The same with the anatomical approach that Kelvin Miyahira had.

 

I think what often happens is that the stuff that doesn’t jive with the biomechanics, the biomechanics people discredit Mac for it. And then they think there is no possible way that Mac could have found something years ago that they just recently discovered. But like I said, it’s two different means to an end and there is some crossover and since Mac’s research has been going on since the 80’s, he had a headstart in being able to discover some of those things.

 

As far as Manzella goes, I would give him credit for bringing Trackman to the forefront as far as a teaching tool. I think it’s much more limited in scope as far as a teaching tool than he would claim. And Brian was a proponent of ‘zeroing out’ for a while.

 

For me personally, he was the first teacher that I came across that went into detail how much trouble an open clubface can cause and how it’s so prevalent in higher handicaps. I’m certain other teachers felt the same way, but Brian was the first I came across that went into detail about it. And most teachers were okay with the face being a little open.

 

As far as bringing scientists out to the forefront…the PGA has always tried to get into contact with scientific researchers about the swing. I don’t think they were as eager as Brian was, but they have done so for decades. The big difference is that today there are more researchers available. I’m guessing this has to do with the internet where any researcher that does legitimately good research on the swing can be found. Without the internet, people like Sasho probably wouldn’t even care to get into golf research because it would be too difficult to get the message out there.

 

In the end, there’s probably a miniscule amount of the golf swing that has not been ‘discovered’ by somebody else. Or at least a teacher that was a proponent of that and just had different verbiage and reasoning in explaining it.

 

 

 

 

RH

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Frozen Divots" said:

> From the Lassiegohome post-

>

> ‘Their values will deviate from actual values, resulting in errors in net joint torques.’

>

> Exactly!!!!

>

 

Everything wants to run parallel in force, but the problem is it kind of looks backwards to the human eye especially if you are only considering the structured look of the swing. It is up to the golfer to align it all in the end.

G425lst Ventus Blk 6x

Sim2 Ti 3w

TM Rescue 16

MP20 HMB 4/3

MP20 MB 5-P Modus 120x

T22 52.09S T22 56.14S T24 59.11V

Oworks 7s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"ALPHA MAN" said:

> Ryke effect has flaws it doesn't account for different grip strengths.

>

> https://forums.golfwrx.com/discussion/1493528/is-golf-science-based-on-fake-dynamics/p3

 

It's main flaw is that is entirely bogus. We've had this discussion years ago. Ryan Kevin has no clue what is happening in a golf swing - he tinkered together a neat little device and claims that the golfer can close the club head without any torque applied via the elbow/wrist etc. Even has stated Stricker has no wrist c0ck so and uses the so called effect. Of course, maybe he's on to something and all the science guys are just full of it, lol. Lassie is that you WILDTHING?

 

Sealed with a curse as sharp as a knife.  Doomed is your soul and damned is your life.
Enjoy every sandwich

The first rule of the Dunning-Kruger club is that you don’t know you are a member.   The second rule is that we’re all members from time to time.

"for I think a law that is not just, is not actually a law" ("nam mihi lex esse non videtur, quae justa non fuerit")  Saint Augustine of Hippo

#Kwonified

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That’s a velocity graph not movement. Get one of cheethams showing movement

https://www.philcheetham.com/media/Phillip-Cheetham-Doctoral-Dissertation-2014.pdf

 

Look at figure 14 on page 31

 

Sealed with a curse as sharp as a knife.  Doomed is your soul and damned is your life.
Enjoy every sandwich

The first rule of the Dunning-Kruger club is that you don’t know you are a member.   The second rule is that we’re all members from time to time.

"for I think a law that is not just, is not actually a law" ("nam mihi lex esse non videtur, quae justa non fuerit")  Saint Augustine of Hippo

#Kwonified

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve said all a long that the ryke effect is ud/ supination. Naming something after yourself that has been know for A decade before he created the so-called ryke effect is s hoot. But Kevin claims otherwise. He is retired guy with time on his hands. Never taught golf. No access to 3D. He looks at YouTube video.

 

Sealed with a curse as sharp as a knife.  Doomed is your soul and damned is your life.
Enjoy every sandwich

The first rule of the Dunning-Kruger club is that you don’t know you are a member.   The second rule is that we’re all members from time to time.

"for I think a law that is not just, is not actually a law" ("nam mihi lex esse non videtur, quae justa non fuerit")  Saint Augustine of Hippo

#Kwonified

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His work is bogus. Believe what you will.

 

Sealed with a curse as sharp as a knife.  Doomed is your soul and damned is your life.
Enjoy every sandwich

The first rule of the Dunning-Kruger club is that you don’t know you are a member.   The second rule is that we’re all members from time to time.

"for I think a law that is not just, is not actually a law" ("nam mihi lex esse non videtur, quae justa non fuerit")  Saint Augustine of Hippo

#Kwonified

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @LASSIEGOHOME said:

> But good enough to be included in the 'World Scientific Congress of Golf VII' (as was Phil Cheethams's research too).

> https://journals.humankinetics.com/doi/pdf/10.1123/ijgs.2015-0007

> See S10 , S14 and Ryke effect on S81 .

> But interestingly enough, you have still not criticised the physics of the Ryke effect, which looks okay to me for the explanation of how the DP motion is negated and transforms to a conical pendulum . Whether or not the ' Ryke angle' is somehow connected to more clubhead speed is still dubious but there is no doubt in my mind that the phenomenon can be made to happen (and help assist squaring of the clubface in the late downswing by a passive pitching of the lead arm).

 

So let me addresss the items on RYKE and motorcyle, etc.

Here is RK's own definition of the RYKE effect - he has never supplied any information on how he determined this, how he measured this, etc. The physics are unknown since he has never supplied any. Kevin's own defintion of the Ryke effect:

 

---------------

The present inventor has made the surprising discovery that closing of the club head face during the downswing is not caused by a torque generated within the player's elbow joint in their leading arm, or by a torque generated in the player's wrists. Rather, this action is generated by the leading hand moving downwardly during the downswing as the club is rotated from behind the golf ball generally towards the ball. This allows the club head to rotate as a result of relative positions and velocities of the club head and player's hands.

 

Club head rotation that is achieved in this manner—which is absent any torque generated either within the player's elbow or forearm joint in their leading arm, or within the player's wrists—is an action that is defined by the inventor as the “RYKE Effect”.

 

---------------

So he says you can close the face with zero torque supplied by the elbow, forearm, wrist - how do you do that when they

are actively supply torques throughout the swing - and every swing has supination during the release - the wrist are flexing/extending and going along for the supination ride. What are these joints doing and where is his evidence to support this - this is physically impossible to do - do you stop your elbow/forearm/wrist from supinating during the release to perform this so called Ryke effect? Where is his work to show the physics? What were his methods? How did he measure body movements - what 3D system did he use - what level players were involved in his work? - did he model this beyond the modified double pendulum and where is it?

 

Second, the motorcycle is seen in all good swings - I've emailed Tyler Ferrell on this and he has seen 1000s of 3D graphs (he actually was one of the first person's involved in analysis of 3D swing graphs) and he has seen this move in all of these "tour" swings (be they tour or good ams). Cheetham's graphs show the move - the graph you posted has it but since it is a velocity graph as noted in Cheetham's dissertation flex/extend is opposite the movement graph) - so that velocity graph shows the flexion happening (it's negative) and then going to extension (going positive) right before impact.

 

Concerning generating a "passive" torque that aids in club squaring try shallowing the club, ie getting the path of the club's COM below the hand path during the downswing - these two guys (and Sasho modeled this ) discuss this here

 

I also find the lack of interest of the golf science crowd in the Ryle effect pretty telling. If this is some big insight into the swing, why no interest? Why no other research?

 

Sealed with a curse as sharp as a knife.  Doomed is your soul and damned is your life.
Enjoy every sandwich

The first rule of the Dunning-Kruger club is that you don’t know you are a member.   The second rule is that we’re all members from time to time.

"for I think a law that is not just, is not actually a law" ("nam mihi lex esse non videtur, quae justa non fuerit")  Saint Augustine of Hippo

#Kwonified

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alpha

 

I have to admit, you had me fooled over the past week, or so.

 

At first, I thought you were assigned to WRX as part of the Jacobs/Nesbit book promotion tour.

 

I now realize there is no way in h*ll either of them would admit association with you, and that you are simply here to make mockery of them. . . and yourself.

 

Please proceed. . . at our amusement.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @AMGolfPro said:

> Alpha

>

> I have to admit, you had me fooled over the past week, or so.

>

> At first, I thought you were assigned to WRX as part of the Jacobs/Nesbit book promotion tour.

>

> I now realize there is no way in h*ll either of them would admit association with you, and that you are simply here to make mockery of them. . . and yourself.

>

> Please proceed. . . at our amusement.

 

Disagree. This is exactly the tone they have been proceeding with ever since the book came out.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alpha

 

Nothing you have posted makes you or Jacobs or Nesbit ‘right.’ In fact, the model used, measurements collected and conclusions drawn are NOT ‘right.’

 

There is no perfect science or scientific method. Again, all models are wrong, but some can be useful.

 

As example, and as Frozen Divots previously explained, Newton proved his theory with math, but his theory was wrong. . . still, useful toward advancing further understanding.

 

The entire basis of scientific advancement is critical thinking. You, Jacobs and Nesbit are present yourselves as being beyond approach, and are simply critical. The Jacobs 3D model MIGHT prove useful, but you are wrong in your thinking and presentation of thoughts.

 

You reap what you sow Alpha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @AMGolfPro said:

> I do not think you disagree. . . my comments were not intended to be any form of endorsement or praise for anyone in that ‘camp,’ or their book.

 

I disagree that they would not associate with him. The tone he has set here is right in line with the tone they have set since the release of the book. It is one of 3 people. Feltman, silva, or dandy. Finney's been asked repeatedly by guys in the other camp to tone it down. He and Brian have their own deal and finney is passionate about this stuff.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Fort Worth Pro" said:

> > @AMGolfPro said:

> > I do not think you disagree. . . my comments were not intended to be any form of endorsement or praise for anyone in that ‘camp,’ or their book.

>

> I disagree that they would not associate with him. The tone he has set here is right in line with the tone they have set since the release of the book. It is one of 3 people. Feltman, silva, or dandy. Finney's been asked repeatedly by guys in the other camp to tone it down. He and Brian have their own deal and finney is passionate about this stuff.

>

>

Gotcha, and agree. . . it was ‘tongue in cheek’ statement that did not come across as intended. Of course they associate with him.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"ALPHA MAN" said:

> > @LASSIEGOHOME said:

> > > @"ALPHA MAN" said:

> > > Brian Manzella Howard, it's so correct it's self evident.

> > >

> > > Imagine going back into a time machine.....say 2004....run down Ben Doyle, Gregg Mc Hatton, and Chuck Cook.

> > >

> > > Tell them that clubhead lag pressure will reverse itself in the last .02 of a second before impact, meaning that the golfer will be applying their MAXIMUM FORCE ACROSS THE SHAFT at the point where the hands past the right leg and then the clubhead will start MAGICALLY racing forward—clubhead throwaway style—and you will HAVE TO APPLY REVERSE LAG PRESSURE pre impact. Whether you like it or not.

> > >

> > > Whether you are hitting a driver over a "Hinkle tree"...

> > >

> > > or

> > >

> > > Hitting a knock down wedge out of a divot into a hurricane...

> > >

> > > or

> > >

> > > You have more "accumulator lag" than Art Wall, Ben Hogan, and John "Lag Pressure" Erikson combined....

> > >

> > > or

> > >

> > > You have a sweepy-er release than David Toms, Chris Hamburger and Nakia Davis combined....

> > >

> > > They would laugh you right back into your time machine.

> > >

> > > And be 100% correct.

> >

> > No-one said positive torque doesn't happen for short irons (ie. 7 iron - wedges ).

>

>

>

>

> Happens for all clubs and I never said anything about 7-wedge you did. Plus Sasho and crew said they never seen positive...ever!!

 

Not true. Sasho has said he has never seen a positive FULL SWING but he wouldn't rule it out as possible.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FD

 

The problem for Alpha Man and his masters is that YOU do NOT have anything to gain, or lose. . . that you are golf ‘hobbyest.’

 

They, on the other hand, are making a living - you know, selling books - to the same suckers that think Taylormade’s newest driver released every 6 weeks will add 20 yards to their drives.

 

Alpha Man and his masters will dip and dodge your questions until the checks are all cashed and book is out of print, partly because the answers undermine the validity of their snake venom, but mostly because they do not have a clue regarding the answers to the questions posed - they do not fully understand the physics.

 

The really crazy thing is that they are not measuring anything that means a damn thing, even if their understanding and methods were valid. You do not need ‘measurements’ to understand what’s going on in the golf swing. Physics does not change to accommodate golfers. It’s academic minutia that clutters the shelves and minds of golfers.

 

Again, Alpha Man and his masters underestimated their audience. Caught with their pants down publicly on their book promotion tour, all we are going to continue to get are ‘rinse and repeat’ responses by Alpha Man. Desperate attempts to deflect the shadows of doubt cast upon him and his masters.

 

Alpha Man, it did not have to be this way. Nobody set out to disparage you or your masters. A little critical thinking coupled with humility and amicability would have certainly benefitted your cause. Instead, you came out ‘guns ablaze,’ and have shot your feet right out from underneath you.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"ALPHA MAN" said:

>

> Michael Jacobs

> 19 mins

>

> Club flying out of his hands? Force completely backwards so its snapping the club forward so hard he has to negative couple?

>

> No chance!

>

>

> agxtgcv76jr2.png

>

 

We've gone full stack and tilt using still photos. Additionally they are post impact photos to judge the magnitude and direction of pre impact forces and torques. Wow.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWP wrote:

 

“_We've gone full stack and tilt using still photos. Additionally they are post impact photos to judge the magnitude and direction of pre impact forces and torques. Wow._”

 

Dr Nesbits Magic and proprietary Elixir covers it all. . . but since you raise the point, seems clear their ‘sensors’ have proprietary ability to differentiate force applied by hands from those applied to the hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"ALPHA MAN" said:

> > @"Fort Worth Pro" said:

> > > @"ALPHA MAN" said:

> > >

> > > Michael Jacobs

> > > 19 mins

> > >

> > > Club flying out of his hands? Force completely backwards so its snapping the club forward so hard he has to negative couple?

> > >

> > > No chance!

> > >

> > >

> > > agxtgcv76jr2.png

> > >

> >

> > We've gone full stack and tilt using still photos. Additionally they are post impact photos to judge the magnitude and direction of pre impact forces and torques. Wow.

> >

> >

>

> He wouldn't get there if he did what Sasho thinks. You have no clue do you, you think Nesbit/Jacobs used still pics to do his study....that's laughable! You never used still pics to prove a point did you, what a joke!

>

>

> The more force you put across the shaft the more you will have to torque it that's the point!!!

 

You have no idea what I know. That picture is a joke. I am fully aware they are using gears for their captures and then have software they run the data through. Just an aside...the changing frame of reference is not enough to explain the difference in the conclusions on the alpha torque numbers.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"ALPHA MAN" said:

> > @"Frozen Divots" said:

> > Negative torque, as you guys define it, doesn’t have to be a pull back check swing.

>

> Negative alpha torque! Yeah it does defined by Sasho, you don't know what has gone on for 5years, again commenting with no knowledge of what's happening

 

Regardless of what brian says...it's not a check swing.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • 2024 Valspar Championship WITB Photos (Thanks to bvmagic)- Discussion & Links to Photos
      This weeks WITB Pics are from member bvmagic (Brian). Brian's first event for WRX was in 2008 at Bayhill while in college. Thanks so much bv.
       
      Please put your comments or question on this thread. Links to all the threads are below...
       
       
       
       
      • 31 replies
    • 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #3
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Matt (LFG) Every - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Sahith Theegala - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Cameron putters (and new "LD" grip) - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Bettinardi MB & CB irons - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Bettinardi API putter cover - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Swag API covers - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Golf Pride Reverse Taper grips - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 15 replies
    • 2024 Cognizant Classic - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #1
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #2
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #3
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #4
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Brandt Snedeker - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Max Greyserman - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Eric Cole - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Carl Yuan - WITb - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Russell Henley - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Justin Sun - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alex Noren - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Shane Lowry - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Taylor Montgomery - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jake Knapp (KnappTime_ltd) - WITB - - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Super Stoke Pistol Lock 1.0 & 2.0 grips - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      LA Golf new insert putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Garsen Quad Tour 15 grip - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Swag covers - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jacob Bridgeman's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Bud Cauley's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Ryo Hisatsune's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Chris Kirk - new black Callaway Apex CB irons and a few Odyssey putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alejandro Tosti's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      • 2 replies
    • 2024 Genesis Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #3
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #4
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Rory McIlroy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Sepp Straka - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Patrick Rodgers - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Brendon Todd - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Denny McCarthy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Corey Conners - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Chase Johnson - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tommy Fleetwood - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Matt Fitzpatrick - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Si Woo Kim - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Viktor Hovland - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Wyndham Clark - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Cam Davis - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Nick Taylor - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Ben Baller WITB update (New putter, driver, hybrid and shafts) – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Vortex Golf rangefinder - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Fujikura Ventus shaft - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods & TaylorMade "Sun Day Red" apparel launch event, product photos – 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods Sun Day Red golf shoes - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Aretera shafts - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Toulon putters - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods' new white "Sun Day Red" golf shoe prototypes – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      • 22 replies
    • 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put and questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open - Monday #1
      2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open - Monday #2
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Ben Taylor - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Garrick Higgo - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Billy Horschel - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Justin Lower - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Lanto Griffin - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Bud Cauley - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Corbin Burnes (2021 NL Cy Young) - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Greyson Sigg - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Charley Hoffman - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Nico Echavarria - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Victor Perez - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Sami Valimaki - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Ryo Hisatsune - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      Jake Knapp's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      New Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Tyler Duncan's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Greyson Sigg's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Sunjae Im's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Ping's Waste Management putter covers - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Vincent Whaley's custom Cameron - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Odyssey Waste Management putter covers - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Super Stroke custom grips - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Zac Blair's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Bettinardi Waste Management putter covers - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
       
       
       
       
       
       

       
      • 12 replies

×
×
  • Create New...