Evnroll Not the #1 Most Wanted Blade Putter??!??!!

[gunmetal]

> @Z1ggy16 said:

> Uh ok.

>

> I'm curious though, what makes their testing valid then? What does averaging out 20 different golfers data and crowning a club "best" signify for you? Are you running out and buying the #1 putter/driver/X Club every year because they say so?

>

> You saying you just "disagree" is fine , everybody has their own thoughts and rationale, which is cool by me. If they didn't the world would kind of suck and be rather dull. But blanket LMAO'ing me because you don't like what I say doesn't really provide much substance to your stance other than you come off as a typical internet crybaby.

>

> What they do is fun, cool and certainly interesting. But it's a far cry from anything scientific or statistically useful TO ME. You think otherwise, and that's okay.

 

Same. I've went the rounds with them many times, and most recently did so on this "test" and their conclusions. They have a high level of arrogance, not confidence, about what they do so they don't really listen to the seriously potentially fatal flaws in their testing. They don't want to hear it.

My biggest beef is when they put something out (like putters) that is a "Most Accurate..." category or just when they test for accuracy. I fitted clubs for ten years (TT Performance Fitting Center, Fuji Charter dealer, yadi yadi ya) and I was very careful to explain to my customers that it was my job to help them improve center contact messing around with weight, length, lie, etc but it was their job and that of their coach to help them square the face and figure out the path. That's what determines accuracy. _GOLF CLUBS AREN'T INHERENTLY ACCURATE OR INACCURATE_ unless they're milled with 18th century equipment and their faces aren't flat or curved accordingly for bulge and roll.

In the end they told me that most golfers will improve by using the Taylormade Juno blade because of the data they collected. I disagree strongly, despite the fact that I have no doubt that club is a great putter. In the end their tests are fun, but by no means any true indication of the conclusions they draw. **In my opinion of course**.

[gunmetal]

> @willseo said:

> Okay so I checked the last few years of Most Wanted Blade Putter results and it looks like the TM Juno was the #2 performer in 2017 and 2018. So I guess that putter has been somewhat consistent in being highly ranked.

 

Wonder why Rory ditched it. Maybe it's only the most accurate for the pool of players they tested and not PGA world beaters. Or maybe the human element overrides any conclusions they draw from their tests. Maybe.

[RogerinNewZealand]

JJFCPA gave a great answer.We change as time goes on !My B60 5bz was great for years...my Cleveland Classic CS Mallet was sweet..my pro plat mid slant looks like thats the Luckie Find.Still here after a year. Thanks to Richie for your loft/QC info.Aim or Lack of alignment can be hard to spot!

[Dpavs]

Or is it simply that once you narrow it down to the top 10-15 putters in anyone category , it's more about the guys putting and what fits their eye, etc. than the putters themselves?