Jump to content
2024 Houston Open WITB Photos ×

New LR E-12


Recommended Posts

This MUST be a joke...

 

'MLR E-12

“When taking Back-On-the-Line relief, there is no additional penalty if a player plays a ball that

was dropped in the relief area required by the relevant Rule (Rule 16.1c(2), 17.1d(2), 19.2b or

19.3b) but came to rest outside the relief area, so long as the ball, when played, is within one

club-length of where it first touched the ground when dropped.

This exemption from penalty applies even if the ball is played from nearer the hole than the

reference point (but not if played from nearer the hole than the spot of the original ball or the

estimated point where the ball last crossed the edge of the penalty area).

This Local Rule does not change the procedure for taking Back-On-the-Line relief under a

relevant Rule. This means that the reference point and relief area are not changed by this Local

Rule and that Rule 14.3c(2) can be applied by a player who drops a ball in the right way and it

comes to rest outside the relief area, whether this occurs on the first or second drop.” (Added

4/2019)'

 

Honestly! Seven years of pondering and now RBs noticed this... sad sad sad...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can understand the part about not having to redrop if the ball goes forward, or backward, of the drop since you could of dropped the ball at the spot to begin with.It just happened that you chose a point farther BOL to drop. Only odd part is the ball going laterally outside the relief area.

SIM 2 Max 9.0 turned 7.0
TM Sim2 Titaniu, 13.5
TM RBZ 19* hybrid

TM RBZ 22* hybrid
Mizuno JPX 900 HM 5-PW
Vokey SM7 48* F Grind
Vokey SM7 54* F Grind
Vokey SM7 58* M Grind

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Mr. Bean" said:

> This MUST be a joke...

>

> 'MLR E-12

> “When taking Back-On-the-Line relief, there is no additional penalty if a player plays a ball that

> was dropped in the relief area required by the relevant Rule (Rule 16.1c(2), 17.1d(2), 19.2b or

> 19.3b) but came to rest outside the relief area, so long as the ball, when played, is within one

> club-length of where it first touched the ground when dropped.

> This exemption from penalty applies even if the ball is played from nearer the hole than the

> reference point (but not if played from nearer the hole than the spot of the original ball or the

> estimated point where the ball last crossed the edge of the penalty area).

> This Local Rule does not change the procedure for taking Back-On-the-Line relief under a

> relevant Rule. This means that the reference point and relief area are not changed by this Local

> Rule and that Rule 14.3c(2) can be applied by a player who drops a ball in the right way and it

> comes to rest outside the relief area, whether this occurs on the first or second drop.” (Added

> 4/2019)'

>

> Honestly! Seven years of pondering and now RBs noticed this... sad sad sad...

I think it's your continual criticism of the ruling bodies and the 2019 Rules that is sad, sad, sad, and very tiring. As you said to others, give up the game or just make up your own rules.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel certain there will be no pressure from the members of my club for this Local Rule. (I will resist it only because I don't wish to spend my time in the bar explaining it . . . E-5 is tough enough. We've had to make E-5 fit on a bumper sticker already.)

Knowledge of the Rules is part of the applied skill set which a player must use to play competitive golf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @Sawgrass said:

> What do you mean the RBs “noticed this?” It seems to me that they made a curious choice to be more flexible, but did not “notice” a mistake. Agreed?

>

> I have no earthly idea why this LR would be useful. Someone please educate me.

 

It simply eliminates the wrong place 2SP that could arise if someone took BOL relief, failed to identify/choose a reference point and then the ball moved forward an inch after it hit the ground and it was played without being re-dropped. This would seem fully consistent with the 2019 Rules change headlines - eliminate unnecessary penalties. Why penalise a ball moving an inch forward on a BOL drop when the BOL rule permits going back as far as you like? (assuming you are not closer to the hole than the original point).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But why leave it to Committee to decide? What would be their reasoning for this rule on course or in competition? Stupid players?

Ping G15 Titleist 950R Titleist 910D2 Titleist TS2
Titleist 910f 3W
Callaway XHot hybrid
Titleist 735cm Titleist AP2
Vokey wedges
Tri-Ball SRT Odyssey Works Versa #1 Tank Scotty Cameron Futura 5W

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @QEight said:

> But why leave it to Committee to decide? What would be their reasoning for this rule on course or in competition? Stupid players?

 

I agree it is better to change the rule rather than adding yet another issue that each Committee must decide. That is two in the April clarification. If this trend continues, life will get more complicated for people that play multiple courses. I think LRs are best focussed on local condition issues rather than a large number of discretionary choices for every Committee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. I suspect many/most clubs will not even think about this LR so will be faced with the prospect of arguments on course between players who understand the Rule, those that don't, those that understand the LR, those that don't and those that don't know if the LR is in effect.

Just put it in the Rule - what reason is there for not using it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @antip said:

> > @Sawgrass said:

> > What do you mean the RBs “noticed this?” It seems to me that they made a curious choice to be more flexible, but did not “notice” a mistake. Agreed?

> >

> > I have no earthly idea why this LR would be useful. Someone please educate me.

>

> It simply eliminates the wrong place 2SP that could arise if someone took BOL relief, failed to identify/choose a reference point and then the ball moved forward an inch after it hit the ground and it was played without being re-dropped. This would seem fully consistent with the 2019 Rules change headlines - eliminate unnecessary penalties. Why penalise a ball moving an inch forward on a BOL drop when the BOL rule permits going back as far as you like? (assuming you are not closer to the hole than the original point).

 

So it works for someone who didn't understand the 2019 Rule (and played according to 2018 Rules), but only if the ball doesn't move more than 1 CL from where it hit -- when in 2018 a 1 and 1/2 CL move would also have been acceptable.

 

Needless complexity, meet unnecessary penalty. (IMO we should just get used to the very reasonable 2019 rule.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @rogolf said:

> > @"Mr. Bean" said:

> > This MUST be a joke...

> >

> > 'MLR E-12

> > “When taking Back-On-the-Line relief, there is no additional penalty if a player plays a ball that

> > was dropped in the relief area required by the relevant Rule (Rule 16.1c(2), 17.1d(2), 19.2b or

> > 19.3b) but came to rest outside the relief area, so long as the ball, when played, is within one

> > club-length of where it first touched the ground when dropped.

> > This exemption from penalty applies even if the ball is played from nearer the hole than the

> > reference point (but not if played from nearer the hole than the spot of the original ball or the

> > estimated point where the ball last crossed the edge of the penalty area).

> > This Local Rule does not change the procedure for taking Back-On-the-Line relief under a

> > relevant Rule. This means that the reference point and relief area are not changed by this Local

> > Rule and that Rule 14.3c(2) can be applied by a player who drops a ball in the right way and it

> > comes to rest outside the relief area, whether this occurs on the first or second drop.” (Added

> > 4/2019)'

> >

> > Honestly! Seven years of pondering and now RBs noticed this... sad sad sad...

> I think it's your continual criticism of the ruling bodies and the 2019 Rules that is sad, sad, sad, and very tiring. As you said to others, give up the game or just make up your own rules.

>

 

Having a bad day, rogolf..?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Mr. Bean" said:

> > @rogolf said:

> > > @"Mr. Bean" said:

> > > This MUST be a joke...

> > >

> > > 'MLR E-12

> > > “When taking Back-On-the-Line relief, there is no additional penalty if a player plays a ball that

> > > was dropped in the relief area required by the relevant Rule (Rule 16.1c(2), 17.1d(2), 19.2b or

> > > 19.3b) but came to rest outside the relief area, so long as the ball, when played, is within one

> > > club-length of where it first touched the ground when dropped.

> > > This exemption from penalty applies even if the ball is played from nearer the hole than the

> > > reference point (but not if played from nearer the hole than the spot of the original ball or the

> > > estimated point where the ball last crossed the edge of the penalty area).

> > > This Local Rule does not change the procedure for taking Back-On-the-Line relief under a

> > > relevant Rule. This means that the reference point and relief area are not changed by this Local

> > > Rule and that Rule 14.3c(2) can be applied by a player who drops a ball in the right way and it

> > > comes to rest outside the relief area, whether this occurs on the first or second drop.” (Added

> > > 4/2019)'

> > >

> > > Honestly! Seven years of pondering and now RBs noticed this... sad sad sad...

> > I think it's your continual criticism of the ruling bodies and the 2019 Rules that is sad, sad, sad, and very tiring. As you said to others, give up the game or just make up your own rules.

> >

>

> Having a bad day, rogolf..?

 

Dear Mr Bean,

You certainly are entitled to your opinion on the 2019 Rules. You've expressed the notion that the new Rules are unsatisfactory many, many times on the forum. Don't be surprised that your friends here have noticed, and don't be surprised that a few are weary of your campaign against the Rules.

Knowledge of the Rules is part of the applied skill set which a player must use to play competitive golf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off. Will someone give me the cliffs notes for how to find this LR on the USga app ? Searching LR or local rule e-12 nets nothing.

 

I wanted to read it as I wondered if this will allow a scenario where the ball may roll forward onto a green etc from some Instances.

 

Does it include marked drop zones ? Etc. pardon me if those are silly questions. As I said. I can’t find the Wording to read for myself.

Callaway epic max LS 9* GD-M9003 7x 

TM Sim2 max tour  16* GD  ADHD 8x 

srixon zx 19* elements 9F5T 

Cobra king SZ 25.5* KBS TD cat 5 70 

TM p7mc 5-pw Mmt125tx 

Mizuno T22 raw 52-56-60 s400

LAB Mezz Max armlock 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @bladehunter said:

> First off. Will someone give me the cliffs notes for how to find this LR on the USga app ? Searching LR or local rule e-12 nets nothing.

>

> I wanted to read it as I wondered if this will allow a scenario where the ball may roll forward onto a green etc from some Instances.

>

> Does it include marked drop zones ? Etc. pardon me if those are silly questions. As I said. I can’t find the Wording to read for myself.

 

> @bladehunter said:

> First off. Will someone give me the cliffs notes for how to find this LR on the USga app ? Searching LR or local rule e-12 nets nothing.

>

> I wanted to read it as I wondered if this will allow a scenario where the ball may roll forward onto a green etc from some Instances.

>

> Does it include marked drop zones ? Etc. pardon me if those are silly questions. As I said. I can’t find the Wording to read for myself.

 

http://www.usga.org/rules-hub/rulesarticles/clarifications-of-the-2019-rules-of-golf.html

 

I'm not an App person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Mr. Bean" said:

> > @rogolf said:

> > > @"Mr. Bean" said:

> > > This MUST be a joke...

> > >

> > > 'MLR E-12

> > > “When taking Back-On-the-Line relief, there is no additional penalty if a player plays a ball that

> > > was dropped in the relief area required by the relevant Rule (Rule 16.1c(2), 17.1d(2), 19.2b or

> > > 19.3b) but came to rest outside the relief area, so long as the ball, when played, is within one

> > > club-length of where it first touched the ground when dropped.

> > > This exemption from penalty applies even if the ball is played from nearer the hole than the

> > > reference point (but not if played from nearer the hole than the spot of the original ball or the

> > > estimated point where the ball last crossed the edge of the penalty area).

> > > This Local Rule does not change the procedure for taking Back-On-the-Line relief under a

> > > relevant Rule. This means that the reference point and relief area are not changed by this Local

> > > Rule and that Rule 14.3c(2) can be applied by a player who drops a ball in the right way and it

> > > comes to rest outside the relief area, whether this occurs on the first or second drop.” (Added

> > > 4/2019)'

> > >

> > > Honestly! Seven years of pondering and now RBs noticed this... sad sad sad...

> > I think it's your continual criticism of the ruling bodies and the 2019 Rules that is sad, sad, sad, and very tiring. As you said to others, give up the game or just make up your own rules.

> >

>

> Having a bad day, rogolf..?

 

> @"Mr. Bean" said:

> > @rogolf said:

> > > @"Mr. Bean" said:

> > > This MUST be a joke...

> > >

> > > 'MLR E-12

> > > “When taking Back-On-the-Line relief, there is no additional penalty if a player plays a ball that

> > > was dropped in the relief area required by the relevant Rule (Rule 16.1c(2), 17.1d(2), 19.2b or

> > > 19.3b) but came to rest outside the relief area, so long as the ball, when played, is within one

> > > club-length of where it first touched the ground when dropped.

> > > This exemption from penalty applies even if the ball is played from nearer the hole than the

> > > reference point (but not if played from nearer the hole than the spot of the original ball or the

> > > estimated point where the ball last crossed the edge of the penalty area).

> > > This Local Rule does not change the procedure for taking Back-On-the-Line relief under a

> > > relevant Rule. This means that the reference point and relief area are not changed by this Local

> > > Rule and that Rule 14.3c(2) can be applied by a player who drops a ball in the right way and it

> > > comes to rest outside the relief area, whether this occurs on the first or second drop.” (Added

> > > 4/2019)'

> > >

> > > Honestly! Seven years of pondering and now RBs noticed this... sad sad sad...

> > I think it's your continual criticism of the ruling bodies and the 2019 Rules that is sad, sad, sad, and very tiring. As you said to others, give up the game or just make up your own rules.

> >

>

> Having a bad day, rogolf..?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @bladehunter said:

> First off. Will someone give me the cliffs notes for how to find this LR on the USga app ? Searching LR or local rule e-12 nets nothing.

>

> I wanted to read it as I wondered if this will allow a scenario where the ball may roll forward onto a green etc from some Instances.

>

> Does it include marked drop zones ? Etc. pardon me if those are silly questions. As I said. I can’t find the Wording to read for myself.

 

Official Guide-Committe Procedures-8 Model Local Rules

SIM 2 Max 9.0 turned 7.0
TM Sim2 Titaniu, 13.5
TM RBZ 19* hybrid

TM RBZ 22* hybrid
Mizuno JPX 900 HM 5-PW
Vokey SM7 48* F Grind
Vokey SM7 54* F Grind
Vokey SM7 58* M Grind

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mainly at Mr Bean!

The RBs are faced with the practical impossibility of actually changing a rule when millions of rule books have just been issued around the world. We can, I'd say, expect the various clarifications and additional optional LRs to find their way into the body of the next publication of the Rules. In the meantime, given the inevitability/likelihood of such a massive re-writing job throwing up the need for tweaks, additional explanations and even changes, we are getting "clarifications" and additional LRs. Complicating? Yes. Messy? Yes. Unavoidable? I'd say so.

 

It has its irritating and problematic aspect too. I finally managed to reduce my club's LRs to fit a sheet of A4 and to produce a smaller but still readable font size two-fold version of a size to be inserted into the Player's Edition and felt immodestly pleased with myself. There's no room for additions. >:)

 

I don't find this particular one easy - although it effectively deals with the difficulty Antip reminds us of - and it's easy to be antagonistic. But isn't it rather more helpful to cooperate with making it all work at whatever level we operate at rather than gripe?

 

Now, do I just leave my advisory note to members always to mark the reference point when taking BOL relief in place, or do I adopt this LR? Answers on a plain postcard ..........:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure whether I like the local rule or not. A part of me thinks it should be that way to avoid using the current rule to place the ball. The other side of me is worried introducing this into the rules one day would chip away from the goal of keeping things uniform. I'm convinced our committee would've said no to the rule even if it had been available before the season started (and we finalized the LRs for the year).

 

The biggest concern from our club was about how complicated the LRs would be and how much text there would be. That lead to the committee saying no to my suggestion of introducing the LR for a provisional for a ball possibly lost in a PA. They considered it too complex for the average player and we would've also ran out of room on the LR sheet. All of the rules could've been handled on one page but two necessary rules doubled the word count. One was a red PA, which needed the opposite margin relief option and the other was two NPZs.

 

Interestingly enough, just yesterday I decided to not play by the rules when I wasn't sure whether or not my bladed tee shot cleared a PA and it's nearly a 400-yard walk to go and check. The staff is also getting not-so-friendly feedback of not being allowed to use the opposite margin relief on that hole anymore (it really should be a yellow PA but some years ago, before I got into the rules and the committee, it was changed to a LWH) and now people who struggle to carry a ball 150 yards or so complain when they can't cross the PA from the tips or the second furthest set of tees and can't drop on the other side to get across. :D

 

Edit: I might have veered slightly off topic. Oh well...

Swing DNA: 91/4/3/6/6
Woods: ST 180 or MP-650 - Irons: MP-H5 / MP-53 / MP-4, KBS Tour S - 50º: MP-T5 / 55º: FG Tour PMP  / 60º: RTX ZipCore - Mizuno Bettinardi BC-4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"sui generis" said:

> > @"Mr. Bean" said:

> > > @rogolf said:

> > > > @"Mr. Bean" said:

> > > > This MUST be a joke...

> > > >

> > > > 'MLR E-12

> > > > “When taking Back-On-the-Line relief, there is no additional penalty if a player plays a ball that

> > > > was dropped in the relief area required by the relevant Rule (Rule 16.1c(2), 17.1d(2), 19.2b or

> > > > 19.3b) but came to rest outside the relief area, so long as the ball, when played, is within one

> > > > club-length of where it first touched the ground when dropped.

> > > > This exemption from penalty applies even if the ball is played from nearer the hole than the

> > > > reference point (but not if played from nearer the hole than the spot of the original ball or the

> > > > estimated point where the ball last crossed the edge of the penalty area).

> > > > This Local Rule does not change the procedure for taking Back-On-the-Line relief under a

> > > > relevant Rule. This means that the reference point and relief area are not changed by this Local

> > > > Rule and that Rule 14.3c(2) can be applied by a player who drops a ball in the right way and it

> > > > comes to rest outside the relief area, whether this occurs on the first or second drop.” (Added

> > > > 4/2019)'

> > > >

> > > > Honestly! Seven years of pondering and now RBs noticed this... sad sad sad...

> > > I think it's your continual criticism of the ruling bodies and the 2019 Rules that is sad, sad, sad, and very tiring. As you said to others, give up the game or just make up your own rules.

> > >

> >

> > Having a bad day, rogolf..?

>

> Dear Mr Bean,

> You certainly are entitled to your opinion on the 2019 Rules. You've expressed the notion that the new Rules are unsatisfactory many, many times on the forum. Don't be surprised that your friends here have noticed, and don't be surprised that a few are weary of your campaign against the Rules.

 

Maybe I have expressed myself poorly during these past months as I have no campaign against the new Rules, mainly on the contrary (as I stated today to a group of people I gave a 2 hour briefing to on the course). What I have tried to and still am heavily complaining is that during the seven years' process the Ruling Bodies were not able to simulate the proposals and later Rules chosen in order to make them logical, the main examples having been the Reference Point of BOL in the case of yellow Penalty Area and the caddie standing behind the ball, just to mention IMO two most prominent. And now this E-12. It was very clear from the beginning that this particular part of Rules will be a problem. Me and my referee colleagues spotted that from the Day 1, how come the RBs did not??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Colin L" said:

 

> Now, do I just leave my advisory note to members always to mark the reference point when taking BOL relief in place, or do I adopt this LR? Answers on a plain postcard ..........:)

 

The RP does not need to be marked, it just has to be chosen and for that mere pointing with a toe of a club is sufficient. This is what I advised my forum of today to do if they are too busy or lazy to stick a tee on the ground. The real problem is to remember to do one of those.

 

Related to this, did we already handle the situation where a player does not tell other which RP he chose in his mind and just drops a ball and it rolls towards the hole? After he played his ball another player claims a penalty for playing from a Wrong Place but the player says he chose a RP closer to hole. Ruling?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any IT/Systems specialist will tell you that the most under tested and undervalued parts of designing, writing and implementing a new system are

1) Determining all the 'What ifs' that may be expected and more importantly not expected

2) Testing the 'What ifs' with people who were not involved in the writing.

 

Any **potential** 'if' must be followed by a 'then' and an 'else' and golf is almost overwhelmed with them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @Newby said:

> Any IT/Systems specialist will tell you that the most under tested and undervalued parts of designing, writing and implementing a new system are

> 1) Determining all the 'What ifs' that may be expected and more importantly not expected

> 2) Testing the 'What ifs' with people who were not involved in the writing.

>

> Any **potential** 'if' must be followed by a 'then' and an 'else' and golf is almost overwhelmed with them

 

Most of the text you wrote is gibberish to me, but incidentally my wife is an IT-specialist as well as a golfer and a golf referee, and her words regarding E-12 were 'sheer incompetence'...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Mr. Bean" said:

> > @Newby said:

> > Any IT/Systems specialist will tell you that the most under tested and undervalued parts of designing, writing and implementing a new system are

> > 1) Determining all the 'What ifs' that may be expected and more importantly not expected

> > 2) Testing the 'What ifs' with people who were not involved in the writing.

> >

> > Any **potential** 'if' must be followed by a 'then' and an 'else' and golf is almost overwhelmed with them

>

> Most of the text you wrote is gibberish to me, but incidentally my wife is an IT-specialist as well as a golfer and a golf referee, and her words regarding E-12 were 'sheer incompetence'...

 

**If** this situation occurs

**then** take such and such action

**else** take a different action

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Mr. Bean" said:

> > @"Colin L" said:

>

> > Now, do I just leave my advisory note to members always to mark the reference point when taking BOL relief in place, or do I adopt this LR? Answers on a plain postcard ..........:)

>

> The RP does not need to be marked, it just has to be chosen and for that mere pointing with a toe of a club is sufficient. This is what I advised my forum of today to do if they are too busy or lazy to stick a tee on the ground. The real problem is to remember to do one of those.

>

> Related to this, did we already handle the situation where a player does not tell other which RP he chose in his mind and just drops a ball and it rolls towards the hole? After he played his ball another player claims a penalty for playing from a Wrong Place but the player says he chose a RP closer to hole. Ruling?

No penalty. This player clearly is alert to the detail of the rule. And integrity is assumed in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Mr. Bean" said:

> > @"Colin L" said:

>

> > Now, do I just leave my advisory note to members always to mark the reference point when taking BOL relief in place, or do I adopt this LR? Answers on a plain postcard ..........:)

>

> The RP does not need to be marked, it just has to be chosen and for that mere pointing with a toe of a club is sufficient. This is what I advised my forum of today to do if they are too busy or lazy to stick a tee on the ground. The real problem is to remember to do one of those.

>

> Related to this, did we already handle the situation where a player does not tell other which RP he chose in his mind and just drops a ball and it rolls towards the hole? After he played his ball another player claims a penalty for playing from a Wrong Place but the player says he chose a RP closer to hole. Ruling?

>

I'm well aware the reference doesn't have to be marked. My advisory note is just that - advice to members. In this type of relief, they _should_ mark the reference point. It makes for an easier life as you yourself have illustrated!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Discussion and links to Photos
      Please put any questions or Comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Monday #1
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Monday #2
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #1
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #2
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #3
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Thorbjorn Olesen - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Ben Silverman - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jesse Droemer - SoTX PGA Section POY - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      David Lipsky - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Martin Trainer - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Zac Blair - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jacob Bridgeman - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Trace Crowe - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jimmy Walker - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Daniel Berger - WITB(very mini) - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Chesson Hadley - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Callum McNeill - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Rhein Gibson - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Patrick Fishburn - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Peter Malnati - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Raul Pereda - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Gary Woodland WITB (New driver, iron shafts) – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Padraig Harrington WITB – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      Tom Hoge's custom Cameron - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Piretti putters - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Ping putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Kevin Dougherty's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Bettinardi putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Erik Barnes testing an all-black Axis1 putter – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Tony Finau's new driver shaft – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
       
       
       
       
       
      • 7 replies
    • 2024 Valspar Championship WITB Photos (Thanks to bvmagic)- Discussion & Links to Photos
      This weeks WITB Pics are from member bvmagic (Brian). Brian's first event for WRX was in 2008 at Bayhill while in college. Thanks so much bv.
       
      Please put your comments or question on this thread. Links to all the threads are below...
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 31 replies
    • 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #3
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Matt (LFG) Every - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Sahith Theegala - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Cameron putters (and new "LD" grip) - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Bettinardi MB & CB irons - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Bettinardi API putter cover - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Swag API covers - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Golf Pride Reverse Taper grips - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 15 replies
    • 2024 Cognizant Classic - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #1
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #2
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #3
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #4
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Brandt Snedeker - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Max Greyserman - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Eric Cole - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Carl Yuan - WITb - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Russell Henley - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Justin Sun - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alex Noren - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Shane Lowry - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Taylor Montgomery - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jake Knapp (KnappTime_ltd) - WITB - - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Super Stoke Pistol Lock 1.0 & 2.0 grips - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      LA Golf new insert putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Garsen Quad Tour 15 grip - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Swag covers - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jacob Bridgeman's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Bud Cauley's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Ryo Hisatsune's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Chris Kirk - new black Callaway Apex CB irons and a few Odyssey putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alejandro Tosti's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 2 replies
    • 2024 Genesis Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #3
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #4
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Rory McIlroy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Sepp Straka - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Patrick Rodgers - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Brendon Todd - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Denny McCarthy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Corey Conners - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Chase Johnson - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tommy Fleetwood - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Matt Fitzpatrick - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Si Woo Kim - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Viktor Hovland - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Wyndham Clark - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Cam Davis - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Nick Taylor - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Ben Baller WITB update (New putter, driver, hybrid and shafts) – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Vortex Golf rangefinder - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Fujikura Ventus shaft - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods & TaylorMade "Sun Day Red" apparel launch event, product photos – 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods Sun Day Red golf shoes - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Aretera shafts - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Toulon putters - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods' new white "Sun Day Red" golf shoe prototypes – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      • 22 replies

×
×
  • Create New...