2019 MOST WANTED – THE BEST DRIVERS FOR SLOW SWING SPEEDS

leezer99 · May 14, 2019

Read into the report however you want over at the other golf site but results came back with the Callaway Epic Flash Sub Zero as the best overall for swing speeds in the sub 94 mph category.

TM M6 gives up nearly five yards to the Epic Flash and the M5 even more.

Link here: [MGS 2019 MOST WANTED – THE BEST DRIVERS FOR SLOW SWING SPEEDS](https://Not allowed because of spam.com/2019-most-wanted-the-best-drivers-for-slow-swing-speeds/ "MGS 2019 MOST WANTED – THE BEST DRIVERS FOR SLOW SWING SPEEDS")

SEP1006 · May 14, 2019

Well my swing speed is right at 95 and I did a Club Champion fitting this last Saturday. The M6 with the Ventus 6s came out on top over everything I hit. And I hit the Ventus in both heads mentioned above as well as many others. Actually the Callaway Sub Zero and Titleist TS2 ( I think that's it ) both were the 2 bottom ones for me.

leezer99 · May 14, 2019

> @SEP1006 said:

> Well my swing speed is right at 95 and I did a Club Champion fitting this last Saturday. The M6 with the Ventus 6s came out on top over everything I hit. And I hit the Ventus in both heads mentioned above as well as many others. Actually the Callaway Sub Zero and Titleist TS2 ( I think that's it ) both were the 2 bottom ones for me.

95 falls into the medium swing speed which did have the M6 at the top.

Kcct82 · May 15, 2019

> @leezer99 said:

> Read into the report however you want over at the other golf site but results came back with the Callaway Epic Flash Sub Zero as the best overall for swing speeds in the sub 94 mph category.

>

> TM M6 gives up nearly five yards to the Epic Flash and the M5 even more.

>

> Link here: [**** 2019 MOST WANTED – THE BEST DRIVERS FOR SLOW SWING SPEEDS](https://****.com/2019-most-wanted-the-best-drivers-for-slow-swing-speeds/ "**** 2019 MOST WANTED – THE BEST DRIVERS FOR SLOW SWING SPEEDS")

Hi, link doesn’t work, what’s “the other site”? Thx

leezer99 · May 15, 2019

> @Kcct82 said:

> > @leezer99 said:

> > Read into the report however you want over at the other golf site but results came back with the Callaway Epic Flash Sub Zero as the best overall for swing speeds in the sub 94 mph category.

> >

> > TM M6 gives up nearly five yards to the Epic Flash and the M5 even more.

> >

> > Link here: [**** 2019 MOST WANTED – THE BEST DRIVERS FOR SLOW SWING SPEEDS](https://****.com/2019-most-wanted-the-best-drivers-for-slow-swing-speeds/ "**** 2019 MOST WANTED – THE BEST DRIVERS FOR SLOW SWING SPEEDS")

>

> Hi, link doesn’t work, what’s “the other site”? Thx

Might be blocked by GolfWRX...

Sorry... reverse this text: /sdeeps-gniws-wols-rof-srevird-tseb-eht-detnaw-tsom-9102/moc.ypsflogym//:sptth

You can use this site to do it. [https://textreverse.com/](https://textreverse.com/ "https://textreverse.com/")

wkuo3 · May 15, 2019

I had no idea, the there is such huge difference between a 95 MPH swing speed to a 96 MPH one.

I learn something new everyday...….LOL !

Kcct82 · May 15, 2019

> @leezer99 said:

> > @Kcct82 said:

> > > @leezer99 said:

> > > Read into the report however you want over at the other golf site but results came back with the Callaway Epic Flash Sub Zero as the best overall for swing speeds in the sub 94 mph category.

> > >

> > > TM M6 gives up nearly five yards to the Epic Flash and the M5 even more.

> > >

> > > Link here: [**** 2019 MOST WANTED – THE BEST DRIVERS FOR SLOW SWING SPEEDS](https://****.com/2019-most-wanted-the-best-drivers-for-slow-swing-speeds/ "**** 2019 MOST WANTED – THE BEST DRIVERS FOR SLOW SWING SPEEDS")

> >

> > Hi, link doesn’t work, what’s “the other site”? Thx

>

> Might be blocked by GolfWRX...

>

> Sorry... reverse this text: /sdeeps-gniws-wols-rof-srevird-tseb-eht-detnaw-tsom-9102/moc.ypsflogym//:sptth

>

> You can use this site to do it. [https://textreverse.com/](https://textreverse.com/ "https://textreverse.com/")

Hi, thanks! Got your message :smiley:

yellowlover519 · May 15, 2019

Good data. We’re talking about a few yards, however (in the case of the TM M series). Also noticed that the launch and spins with the TM were low. They should have done it with robot testing to see if it’s truly the club/shaft combo or the player.

heavy_hitter · May 15, 2019

> @yellowlover519 said:

> Good data. We’re talking about a few yards, however (in the case of the TM M series). Also noticed that the launch and spins with the TM were low. They should have done it with robot testing to see if it’s truly the club/shaft combo or the player.

My kids numbers with the Epic were not as good as they were with TM.

I don't like a lot of what Not allowed because of spam does with testing. I just don't think they are accurate. I think it is interesting looking at the data, but don't think the testing is done correctly to get true results. I don't care what a bunch of independent testers tell you. The data is going to be off on how they test. Put everything on an arm and the testing will be more accurate. The dumbest testing they have is on the putters. The best testing is on the balls.

golfer55082 · May 15, 2019

What is the game ball your kid will use this year? We have been using Chrome Soft and that report provides a lot of switching power.....

> @heavy_hitter said:

> > @yellowlover519 said:

> > Good data. We’re talking about a few yards, however (in the case of the TM M series). Also noticed that the launch and spins with the TM were low. They should have done it with robot testing to see if it’s truly the club/shaft combo or the player.

>

> My kids numbers with the Epic were not as good as they were with TM.

>

> I don't like a lot of what **** does with testing. I just don't think they are accurate. I think it is interesting looking at the data, but don't think the testing is done correctly to get true results. I don't care what a bunch of independent testers tell you. The data is going to be off on how they test. Put everything on an arm and the testing will be more accurate. The dumbest testing they have is on the putters. The best testing is on the balls.

heavy_hitter · May 16, 2019

> @golfer55082 said:

> What is the game ball your kid will use this year? We have been using Chrome Soft and that report provides a lot of switching power.....

> > @heavy_hitter said:

> > > @yellowlover519 said:

> > > Good data. We’re talking about a few yards, however (in the case of the TM M series). Also noticed that the launch and spins with the TM were low. They should have done it with robot testing to see if it’s truly the club/shaft combo or the player.

> >

> > My kids numbers with the Epic were not as good as they were with TM.

> >

> > I don't like a lot of what **** does with testing. I just don't think they are accurate. I think it is interesting looking at the data, but don't think the testing is done correctly to get true results. I don't care what a bunch of independent testers tell you. The data is going to be off on how they test. Put everything on an arm and the testing will be more accurate. The dumbest testing they have is on the putters. The best testing is on the balls.

>

TP5.