2019 Titleist CB irons

[GolfWRX]

[BearQ]

Love the mid/long irons

[Puppetmaster]

Beautiful shape to these. The short irons look incredibly compact too.

[Davidelliott100]

This is the best iron in the bunch to me. Shapes are awesome.

[jokerusn]

Gorgeous!

[bfizzy]

I wonder if the slight hump in the back of the short irons is Titleist way to distribute weight higher in the club.

[Xdmike20]

Looks like I need to sell a kidney lol

[RH82]

Thumbs down to that epoxied insert in the cavity.

[JonnyKrasnodar]

Stunning looking irons. Towards the end of the year I was expecting to be swapping my JPX900s for the 919s but these have turned my head. I like the 718 CBs but these look better again. Lovely.

[ollyG-MONEY]

I need these <3

[elwhippy]

I shall wait to see these in the metal.

[Konklifer]

They look great. But the 620 name is bad, and Titleist should feel bad.

[LowHeelToeHook]

Love how they softened the lines in the entire profile here. Looks very smooth!

[Pinging77]

Never understood why the CB was still in the lineup as long as they had the AP2. With the introduction of the T100 it is obvious. The CB are good looking and the T100 quite ugly..

[texcrom]

A question for Greg....

Is the gray strip with “CB” on the toe-end an insert? Or are these a solid forging?

Thanks for the great pictures!

[GoIrish17]

These look sharp, but I wish the top line transitioned gradually rather than go from rounded on the 8 iron to flat and square on the 7 iron immediately.

[vrnyn]

Looking good, especially the long irons!

[ani5009]

> @GoIrish17 said:

> These look sharp, but I wish the top line transitioned gradually rather than go from rounded on the 8 iron to flat and square on the 7 iron immediately.

 

I couldn't put my finger on what looked a little off to me but you nailed it. I'm going to be in the market for new irons later this year and thought these were going to be the end of my search when I heard they were coming out. Maybe it won't be so jarring in person

[MattyO1984]

Superb!! My only issue is the loft being stamped on the bottom of the PW. I think that I would want that cranked down to 46 if I was being fit and having it marked as 47 would drive me mad.

[whiteout73]

Solid point ^

That would make me crazy as well

[Nate7357]

New CB's look great with a blend of the T100 top of bag

[agood3putt]

Love the way these look. But unfortunately don't know if I have the skills to game these.

[DatSliceDoe]

Take me down to chunky town!

[The Mad Bomber]

Just can't get behind the look on these. From address, the 3-7 look great, the 9-8-P look weird and bulbous. The back of the iron gives the zero bag appeal in my eyes. I do bet they perform really well, but there's nothing here that's going to move me away from Mizuno's

[HackinNut]

Beautiful irons for sure.

[JonnyKrasnodar]

Love the look of these. I think I'd go specialist wedge for PW and that way my wedges will blend in and the loft stamping will become irrelevant and won't stand out.

These look like winners to me.

 

[OldTomMorris]

Normally I prefer a classic chrome finish and I don't like the way the cavity has evolved, its seems too cluttered just keep it clean and simple. The top line area on the short irons does look a little weird at first. They remind me a little of the JPX919 Tour, I think its the cavity area that does that.

Despite my comments I have to say these are really starting to grow on me, my initial reaction was harsh.

[oz dee cee]

They look good to me. I’d love to see them in the flesh though, to check on the offset. All the shots ‘over the ball’ are cantered to the right. Has me thinking they are trying to hide the fact there is more offset than some of us might like.

[OldTomMorris]

> @"oz dee cee" said:

> They look good to me. I’d love to see them in the flesh though, to check on the offset. All the shots ‘over the ball’ are cantered to the right. Has me thinking they are trying to hide the fact there is more offset than some of us might like.

 

Titleist used to have a matrix of all the specification data for CBs on their site but it appears they stopped putting offset (bounce as well) data on there from 714 onwards. You can still see the data for 712 and 710.

[JGalls]

Love the look! Release date?