Jump to content

US Kids Priority Status


Recommended Posts

Looks like they completely took winning / placing in events out of the equation for determining priority status at the local tour level. Winning or placing in the top only matters in two or three day events moving forward. To me it seems like they finally realized that the local tour fields are pretty weak and allowing kids to get into larger events by simply placing high in their local tours. The priority status afforded to the multi day events is also geared towards building better fields in larger events. From my untrained eyes it sort of looks like they are trying to make this a more competitive tour that holds more clout.

 

Link here: [uS Kids Priority Status](https://www.uskidsgolf.com/tournaments/player-info/priority-status?utm_source=Master+Database&utm_campaign=dc2f910330-priority-status-update-2019&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_312f527041-dc2f910330-233082901&mc_cid=dc2f910330&mc_eid=8b7d4af94f)

 

edit: I'm wondering what is stopping a local tour director from moving their local tour stops to 'easier' courses so that their kids have the opportunity to score better. Also wondering if there is any rule on whether or not the course has to be a par 72 because playing shorter executive courses with a par 67 would definitely make it easier to score better and get higher status.

There's definitely something more important that I should be doing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leezer I have to agree

From what I can tell the are recognizing that some local events are really weak while others are much stronger. I also think US kids is getting a lot of competition from PGA sectionals for juniors and they know they need to have a more competitive worlds event to attract more players from the stronger areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This makes sense and is more fair to Little Johnny from Florida who finished 4th place in his stacked Florida local tour with an average score of 76. He will now get invite to a Regional & World over Little Billy from North Dakota who finished 1st place in his local tour with an average score of 90.

At least in the younger levels (my experience) demand seems high for regional s & worlds. Maybe that changes with older age groups, I dont know. They still will want to fill those fields so they are still going to go down the Priority Status levels as far as they need to to fill the events.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My daughter is 7 and is showing an interest in golf again. From our experience with USK with my son we were planning on bypassing it all together. But may give it a look this year now that it may shape up to be a little better setup. Time will tell. We do have the luxury of having a really well run tour her locally, even if the USK system in general has been flawed imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @darter79 said:

> basically cut the scores in 1/2 for 9 homers. But the biggest question is what status will now get you into what even. What will their regional invite schedule look like. Either way does look like score counts more now than placement.

 

Score should count more than placement. I have said this for quite some time. Was paired in a practice round with a kid from Mississippi that won his local. Kid couldn't break 100 on a good day. Yet, there were really good players on our local tours in Florida that sat at home because they didn't win.

 

This will stop the Status Chasing. I know kids that would play in US Kids Local Tour Events simultaneously to chase the status for worlds.

 

I think they have requirements for the Directors on the types of courses they play. Seems like every time we played at less than a Par 72 course they would stretch the long par 4's into Par 5's to make it play as a Par 72.

  • Like 1

I am GenX.  If you really think I care about what you have to say, I don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm all for the scores counting for something but are they taking into account the tournament it was done in and the distances it was done from. My daughter played in the Florida State tournament this year and it played around 4000 yds which is really short. One of the days she shot 73 which is a great score. The next week we played RedWhite Blue and she shot a 78 from 4700 yds which was also a good score for her. If there isn't any consideration for distance that the score was shot from, then people will work the system. Go play the local tour which is very short and shoot some low numbers and there you go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @Golfingdawg19 said:

> I'm all for the scores counting for something but are they taking into account the tournament it was done in and the distances it was done from. My daughter played in the Florida State tournament this year and it played around 4000 yds which is really short. One of the days she shot 73 which is a great score. The next week we played RedWhite Blue and she shot a 78 from 4700 yds which was also a good score for her. If there isn't any consideration for distance that the score was shot from, then people will work the system. Go play the local tour which is very short and shoot some low numbers and there you go.

 

There are alway going to be people of game the system. Not much you can do about it. Personally if someone scores that score I have no issue with it.

 

What I think will happen instead is you see more stroke shaving in local tours. So instead of bogeys all around they turn into par.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

> @leezer99 said:

> Just saw that US Kids regional this weekend is playing boys 11 at 5,123. That's ridiculously short IMO. I've played the course they will be at and it's resort golf with no trouble. Expect low scores!

 

Still longer than local (4800). My take is until 9 (old yardages) it’s pretty easy to shoot 36 or break par. Not so easy at 11 to shoot par or under, even from 4800. I would be shocked if for boys 11 and 12 if you needed more than a level 9 (2-76s) to get an invite to worlds. Just can’t see 130+ kids doing that to make up a field. For 10u, I expect level 10 to be needed to get in. A couple of 37s or lower is doable in those yardages if you have a decent short game. This is for boys...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @leezer99 said:

> Just saw that US Kids regional this weekend is playing boys 11 at 5,123. That's ridiculously short IMO. I've played the course they will be at and it's resort golf with no trouble. Expect low scores!

 

From what I remember last year, the course plays much longer due to the fact that the ball doesn't roll much on bermuda fairways.

I do expect good amount of red numbers looking at last years score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As you guys have stated, its more about scores now than on placement. I don't have an issue with that. The only thing I see is that they don't differentiate between the distances that the scores are shot from. So a 76 at worlds counts the same as a 76 at a local but yet they are from totally different distances. The further back you go the higher the scores should be. My daughter is 11 and is one of the smaller kids out there. From the short local tour distances she can shoot par but when you move her back to the womens tees then shooting 80 is a good score. There should be some way to weight the scores based on the distance and strength of field. Just my take though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good discussion and I have some strong opinions.

Background (not a passive brag I promise - just to let you know our history/experience):

1) My son is 12. Birthday is on the last day of the summer tour almost always so he has gotten used to playing longer yardages in the summer.

2) Played his 4th Worlds this past August. Finishes between 40-80 with a spike at The Legacy in the 10s. You had to hit the ball 200 to have any chance but those that did lit it up.

3) Just won his local tour against tough competition this past summer shooting low rounds of 74 and 72. (THIS IS KEY TO MY POINT) (also I edited it for a mistake in my original post. Corrected to 74)

4) His good friend played the minimum 4 tournaments and shot 71 twice.

5) My son misses out on full status by a single shot, committed to the tour and played every event and has secondary status compared to his buddy that played 4 tournaments. The scoring criteria US KIDS uses now is that he broke 76 twice and won the tour. This gives him secondary status (Level 10). The fact that he missed the top status by a single shot and they say his scores only matter that he broke 76 is CRAP.

 

I understand the reasoning why US Kids did this, but they HAVE to evaluate how they give status. My son is going to now play the bare minimum and just try to go low. This will hurt local tours as the better players will just stop playing once they get their scores set. My son was -1 through 15 holes and in the middle of the fairway before the pressure of scoring a certain number got to him. He will learn and get better from it but it is still ridiculous to me.

Caddying for my son is the greatest thing in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @tobaccoroad said:

 

> 4) Just won his local tour against tough competition this past summer shooting low rounds of 73 and 72. (THIS IS KEY TO MY POINT)

 

It was 74 and 72.

 

Having played against both your son and his friend many times before, I don't think it's really fair to say that S, who shot 71 twice (last two rounds of the Summer Tour so it wasn't like it he planned it), is less deserving to get status to play at Worlds.

 

Worlds should be a competition among the best players, not who is most committed to the Local Tour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @tobaccoroad said:

> Good discussion and I have some strong opinions.

> Background (not a passive brag I promise - just to let you know our history/experience):

> 1) My son is 12. Turns 12 on the last day of the summer tour almost always. Youngest kid in Worlds.

> 2) Played his 4th Worlds this past August. Finishes between 40-80 with a spike at The Legacy in the 10s. You had to hit the ball 200 to have any chance but those that did lit it up.

> 3) Has won 6 local tours

> 4) Just won his local tour against tough competition this past summer shooting low rounds of 73 and 72. (THIS IS KEY TO MY POINT)

> 5) His good friend played the minimum 4 tournaments and shot 71 twice.

> 6) My son misses out on full status by a single shot, committed to the tour and played every event and has secondary status to his buddy that played 4 tournaments. The scoring criteria US KIDS uses now is that he broke 76 twice and won the tour. This gives him secondary status (Level 10). The fact that he missed the top status by a single shot and they say his scores only matter that he broke 76 is CRAP.

>

> I understand the reasoning why US Kids did this, but they HAVE to evaluate how they give status. My son is going to now play the bare minimum and just try to go low. This will hurt local tours as the better players will just stop playing once they get their scores set. My son was -1 through 15 holes and in the middle of the fairway before the pressure of scoring a certain number got to him. He will learn and get better from it but it is still ridiculous to me.

 

With all due respect, I do not get it. Are you not happy that the cut - off is 76 or that he missed full status to his buddy who shot a lower score.

 

We could debate the cut-off endlessly but they needed to draw the line somewhere and they chose 76. If your son had shot 75 and the cut off was 74..you would have probably not liked that as well.

Anyway, I think the priority status fixed a big flaw with the prior system, kids who shoot low tend to be the best and should make it to the worlds. This will give the stacked local fields from FL/TX/CA a shot to make it for Worlds.

 

That said, no system is perfect and in an ideal world they would adjust the scoring requirement for the course, conditions etc. Wish they had a course rating for each tee box, so a 76 on a 135 rated course counts more then a 76 on a 114 rated course. Also course can play longer and shorter depending on the season/location. I know it is hard to level the playing field but for me personally I have seen a 6-10 stroke differential between my sons score in the spring and fall. It could be that he ages up in spring, or that the ground is not wet in the fall but have noticed the score differential over the last 3 years. I remember starting a thread cause I could not understand what happened to his game during the first spring season...

 

Finally, different perspective to your experience. In an earlier tour, my son did not get full status despite shooting low, winning tournaments but not the full tour. He was the better golfer but he could not compete in each and every tournament for a variety of reason -- that kind of sucks as well.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @CTgolf said:

> > @tobaccoroad said:

>

> > 4) Just won his local tour against tough competition this past summer shooting low rounds of 73 and 72. (THIS IS KEY TO MY POINT)

>

> It was 74 and 72.

>

> Having played against both your son and his friend many times before, I don't think it's really fair to say that S, who shot 71 twice (last two rounds of the Summer Tour so it wasn't like it he planned it), is less deserving to get status to play at Worlds.

>

> Worlds should be a competition among the best players, not who is most committed to the Local Tour.

 

Nice to hear our boys played together. Hopefully they had a good time!

Please do not misunderstand my post. It has nothing to do against the player that plays 4 and breaks par twice. S is absolutely deserving of the highest status and I understand and support that. My point is that US KIDS should have a better recognition of a kid that shoots almost the same AND wins the tour. There should be more weight to it for the kids that do that. Imho to say it should be BETTER then a kid that won the local tour and shot two great scores that were basically right where the level 11 criteria is isn't balanced.

 

My solution would be to give Level 11 status to tour winners that broke 74 twice. When I saw the changes, I immediately thought that the range of 72 twice for level 11, or 76 and winning the tour for level 10 as the next best was too much of a difference. I thought they needed to bridge that gap and 74 twice and winning the tour seems very fair and identifies the best players as well.

Caddying for my son is the greatest thing in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @kcap said:

>

> With all due respect, I do not get it. Are you not happy that the cut - off is 76 or that he missed full status to his buddy who shot a lower score.

>

> We could debate the cut-off endlessly but they needed to draw the line somewhere and they chose 76. If your son had shot 75 and the cut off was 74..you would have probably not liked that as well.

> Anyway, I think the priority status fixed a big flaw with the prior system, kids who shoot low tend to be the best and should make it to the worlds. This will give the stacked local fields from FL/TX/CA a shot to make it for Worlds.

>

> That said, no system is perfect and in an ideal world they would adjust the scoring requirement for the course, conditions etc. Wish they had a course rating for each tee box, so a 76 on a 135 rated course counts more then a 76 on a 114 rated course. Also course can play longer and shorter depending on the season/location. I know it is hard to level the playing field but for me personally I have seen a 6-10 stroke differential between my sons score in the spring and fall. It could be that he ages up in spring, or that the ground is not wet in the fall but have noticed the score differential over the last 3 years. I remember starting a thread cause I could not understand what happened to his game during the first spring season...

>

> Finally, different perspective to your experience. In an earlier tour, my son did not get full status despite shooting low, winning tournaments but not the full tour. He was the better golfer but he could not compete in each and every tournament for a variety of reason -- that kind of sucks as well.

>

 

My point is not to say that the kid that shoots par or better twice shouldn't get status, it is that there is too much of a gap for the kid that basically shoots the same number, wins the tour and does NOT get the high status. His buddy did not "take" the status away - it is completely separate. In theory you could have 10 kids from the same tour earn Level 11. In that case, the new system is 100% fair as those players shouldn't cut each other out. There are strong regions that have players that are some of the best in the world and they would previously (like your son) have been elite players but the old system would have some of them miss out. Again - I am not arguing against the kid that shoots 72 twice. My argument is that the Tour winner that shoots great scores is a completely lower level. Too much differential between the two.

 

If my son had shot 76 twice, I would agree with his status at level 10. Even and then 2 over? No. I do not agree with that at all. But that is obviously just my opinion. US Kids is working it out an I'm sure there will be tweaks until they find their sweet spot.

 

Thanks for your thoughts though. Let's keep talking about it.

Caddying for my son is the greatest thing in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a notch benefit for shooting low and winning the tour. If your son had shot 76 twice and not won the tour his status would have been 9 but now he is 10.

 

I am going to assume that US Kids had bunch of data and where kids score in each age group for locals when deciding the cut-offs - and thus they chose 72 and 76 (win the tour).

 

I do believe they do not give enough credit to winning/placing in the Worlds/Regional. Placing 4th or 5th in the worlds or 2nd in a regional is a 10 which is the same as winning your local tour and shooting 76 and below. That is just wrong. I think we can all agree coming 4-5th at Worlds implies shooting well below par in the shorter local tours.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @kcap said:

> There is a notch benefit for shooting low and winning the tour. If your son had shot 76 twice and not won the tour his status would have been 9 but now he is 10.

>

> I am going to assume that US Kids had bunch of data and where kids score in each age group for locals when deciding the cut-offs - and thus they chose 72 and 76 (win the tour).

>

> I do believe they do not give enough credit to winning/placing in the Worlds/Regional. Placing 4th or 5th in the worlds or 2nd in a regional is a 10 which is the same as winning your local tour and shooting 76 and below. That is just wrong. I think we can all agree coming 4-5th at Worlds implies shooting well below par in the shorter local tours.

>

Agree 100% there is no real reward here for winning and placing well at the bigger events in terms of status. I would like to see a bit more status on winning the local tour as well. But at the end of the day score matters more now. Go shoot lower scores and you can walk away with an good status where before some age groups you could shoot 48 on 9 and have guaranteed status. I do believe this system is better than the old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @tobaccoroad said:

> > @kcap said:

> >

> > With all due respect, I do not get it. Are you not happy that the cut - off is 76 or that he missed full status to his buddy who shot a lower score.

> >

> > We could debate the cut-off endlessly but they needed to draw the line somewhere and they chose 76. If your son had shot 75 and the cut off was 74..you would have probably not liked that as well.

> > Anyway, I think the priority status fixed a big flaw with the prior system, kids who shoot low tend to be the best and should make it to the worlds. This will give the stacked local fields from FL/TX/CA a shot to make it for Worlds.

> >

> > That said, no system is perfect and in an ideal world they would adjust the scoring requirement for the course, conditions etc. Wish they had a course rating for each tee box, so a 76 on a 135 rated course counts more then a 76 on a 114 rated course. Also course can play longer and shorter depending on the season/location. I know it is hard to level the playing field but for me personally I have seen a 6-10 stroke differential between my sons score in the spring and fall. It could be that he ages up in spring, or that the ground is not wet in the fall but have noticed the score differential over the last 3 years. I remember starting a thread cause I could not understand what happened to his game during the first spring season...

> >

> > Finally, different perspective to your experience. In an earlier tour, my son did not get full status despite shooting low, winning tournaments but not the full tour. He was the better golfer but he could not compete in each and every tournament for a variety of reason -- that kind of sucks as well.

> >

>

> My point is not to say that the kid that shoots par or better twice shouldn't get status, it is that there is too much of a gap for the kid that basically shoots the same number, wins the tour and does NOT get the high status. His buddy did not "take" the status away - it is completely separate. In theory you could have 10 kids from the same tour earn Level 11. In that case, the new system is 100% fair as those players shouldn't cut each other out. There are strong regions that have players that are some of the best in the world and they would previously (like your son) have been elite players but the old system would have some of them miss out. Again - I am not arguing against the kid that shoots 72 twice. My argument is that the Tour winner that shoots great scores is a completely lower level. Too much differential between the two.

>

> If my son had shot 76 twice, I would agree with his status at level 10. 1 over? No. I do not agree with that at all. But that is obviously just my opinion. US Kids is working it out an I'm sure there will be tweaks until they find their sweet spot.

>

> Thanks for your thoughts though. Let's keep talking about it.

 

I'm sorry he missed out by few strokes. If he's shooting 74/73, it's only a matter of time before he can shoot low, and he still has at least a couple of seasons to do so. If a kid's best score is a 76 and gets a Level 10, he will be invited to all the regionals and state. However, if he gets invited to the Worlds, he will most likely be shooting in the 80's, due to the longer yardage and tougher course, which is the bottom half of the group.

No-one knows whether the cutoff will be at Level 11, 10 or even 9 yet so all this could be a non-issue.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Discussion and links to Photos
      Please put any questions or Comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Monday #1
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Monday #2
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #1
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #2
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #3
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Thorbjorn Olesen - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Ben Silverman - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jesse Droemer - SoTX PGA Section POY - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      David Lipsky - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Martin Trainer - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Zac Blair - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jacob Bridgeman - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Trace Crowe - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jimmy Walker - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Daniel Berger - WITB(very mini) - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Chesson Hadley - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Callum McNeill - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Rhein Gibson - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Patrick Fishburn - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Peter Malnati - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Raul Pereda - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Gary Woodland WITB (New driver, iron shafts) – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Padraig Harrington WITB – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      Tom Hoge's custom Cameron - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Piretti putters - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Ping putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Kevin Dougherty's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Bettinardi putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Erik Barnes testing an all-black Axis1 putter – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Tony Finau's new driver shaft – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
       
       
       
       
       
      • 7 replies
    • 2024 Valspar Championship WITB Photos (Thanks to bvmagic)- Discussion & Links to Photos
      This weeks WITB Pics are from member bvmagic (Brian). Brian's first event for WRX was in 2008 at Bayhill while in college. Thanks so much bv.
       
      Please put your comments or question on this thread. Links to all the threads are below...
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 31 replies
    • 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #3
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Matt (LFG) Every - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Sahith Theegala - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Cameron putters (and new "LD" grip) - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Bettinardi MB & CB irons - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Bettinardi API putter cover - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Swag API covers - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Golf Pride Reverse Taper grips - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 15 replies
    • 2024 Cognizant Classic - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #1
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #2
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #3
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #4
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Brandt Snedeker - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Max Greyserman - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Eric Cole - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Carl Yuan - WITb - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Russell Henley - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Justin Sun - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alex Noren - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Shane Lowry - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Taylor Montgomery - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jake Knapp (KnappTime_ltd) - WITB - - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Super Stoke Pistol Lock 1.0 & 2.0 grips - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      LA Golf new insert putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Garsen Quad Tour 15 grip - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Swag covers - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jacob Bridgeman's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Bud Cauley's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Ryo Hisatsune's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Chris Kirk - new black Callaway Apex CB irons and a few Odyssey putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alejandro Tosti's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 2 replies
    • 2024 Genesis Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #3
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #4
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Rory McIlroy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Sepp Straka - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Patrick Rodgers - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Brendon Todd - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Denny McCarthy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Corey Conners - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Chase Johnson - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tommy Fleetwood - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Matt Fitzpatrick - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Si Woo Kim - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Viktor Hovland - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Wyndham Clark - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Cam Davis - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Nick Taylor - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Ben Baller WITB update (New putter, driver, hybrid and shafts) – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Vortex Golf rangefinder - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Fujikura Ventus shaft - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods & TaylorMade "Sun Day Red" apparel launch event, product photos – 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods Sun Day Red golf shoes - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Aretera shafts - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Toulon putters - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods' new white "Sun Day Red" golf shoe prototypes – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      • 22 replies

×
×
  • Create New...