Jump to content

New World Handicap System


Recommended Posts

As the GHIN posting season is about to end for most of us, I'm surprised I haven't heard more about implementation of the new system. The articles are all really old from USGA and don't say anything about how they plan to adjust for course conditions, and the other changes that are supposed to go into effect in less than 3 months. I have a friend/playing partner who had never kept a handicap because he would be maxed out at 36.4, but I suspect under the new system, he'll be about a 48 (based on my applying the existing formula to his scores, per the course rating & slope of the courses we've played together).

If USGA and others aren't going to publish any updated articles, maybe WRX could interview someone from R&A/USGA?

Callaway Epic Max LS 10.5 GD Tour AD Red 55 S
4W: Callaway Mavrik 16.5
Hyb: Wishon 2 & 3 (18*, 21*)
Redbird Avian Forged 5-GW
SW/LW: Miura 56*, 60* K grind

Putter: Miura KM008
Srixon Q Star soon to try Vice Pro Zero
Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @Augster said:

> Everything you need to know at this time is here:

>

> https://www.whs.com/

 

I am not sure exactly what we need to know "at this time", but AFAIK the referenced website hasn't been updated for a half year or more. This is their "timeline"

 

_We are planning to make the WHS available for implementation by National Associations beginning in January 2020, after an extensive schedule of testing, communication, promotion and education. _

 

It just doesn't feel like a whole bunch of stuff is going to be made available to the relevant National Associations in just 2 months. OTOH, I am not in that loop.

 

dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think for the consumer, the WHS has released all it needs to. The adjustment for daily conditions will be made in the background, and I imagine that all of the national associations have that calculation method in hand. We golfers really don't need that. The details we haven't seen are the details that will be supplied by our own national association. Which scores to post, adjustments for holes not played, all of the things that will remain different from one part of the world to another, we haven't seen anything from the USGA yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @DaveLeeNC said:

> > @Augster said:

> > Everything you need to know at this time is here:

> >

> > https://www.whs.com/

>

> I am not sure exactly what we need to know "at this time", but AFAIK the referenced website hasn't been updated for a half year or more. This is their "timeline"

>

> _We are planning to make the WHS available for implementation by National Associations beginning in January 2020, after an extensive schedule of testing, communication, promotion and education. _

>

> It just doesn't feel like a whole bunch of stuff is going to be made available to the relevant National Associations in just 2 months. OTOH, I am not in that loop.

>

> dave

 

The “course and playing handicap” section was updated 7/31/19.

 

The “course rating and slope rating” section was updated 7/30/19.

 

The “acceptable scores for a handicap index” section was updated 6/27/19.

 

Perhaps “a half year or more” is a bit of an exaggeration.

 

They gave us all the info there is. Handicaps will be computed like USGA is now with the differentials based on CR and slope. Instead of 10/20, they’ll use 8/20. The highest hole score one can post is net double bogey. They will not allow solo scores just as it is now. They added they won’t allow score while being coached.

 

Everything else, as DaveP043 says, will be up to local ruling bodies for acceptability of scores based on tradition.

 

The “weather adjustment” will basically be zero. But, in the few cases where everyone that posts that course that day shoots incredibly high, the algorithm will adjust your differential down. I doubt the algorithm will ever adjust differentials higher because it was such a great scoring day. Nobody cares if a guy’s cap is too low. They only care if it’s too high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @Augster said:

 

>

> The “weather adjustment” will basically be zero. But, in the few cases where everyone that posts that course that day shoots incredibly high, the algorithm will adjust your differential down. I doubt the algorithm will ever adjust differentials higher because it was such a great scoring day. Nobody cares if a guy’s cap is too low. They only care if it’s too high.

 

We employ the system already so I can make some observations on these themes based on our outcomes. But note the context here is different to the US, here the competition fields for the men (Wed, Sat, Sun) average around 160 players and everyone plays precisely the same course - and all scores are posted. So we have clear data on how the system algorithms drive the final course scratch rating on the day and how it varies from the (theoretical) course scratch rating. My quick look now over the last year of data tells me about one day out of every 7 it goes up or down by one, one day in 20 it goes up or down by two (from my course's scratch rating of 72) . The variations are more likely to be upward in winter months and downward in summer months but do go in both directions. In my experience, the cause of the variation splits between changed weather conditions (eg big winds one day) and the performance of the players on the day - that is, even when weather conditions are entirely stable on the day, the scratch rating can still move up or down - that is, the entire cohort of players on any given day do not perform consistently with their measured average scores. [Edit, note that the variations in the scratch rating move in opposite direction to the adjustment to the differentials - scratch rating is moved down by the system, your differential goes up for any given score.]

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @DaveLeeNC said:

> > @Augster said:

> > Everything you need to know at this time is here:

> >

> > https://www.whs.com/

>

> I am not sure exactly what we need to know "at this time", but AFAIK the referenced website hasn't been updated for a half year or more. This is their "timeline"

>

> _We are planning to make the WHS available for implementation by National Associations beginning in January 2020, after an extensive schedule of testing, communication, promotion and education. _

>

> It just doesn't feel like a whole bunch of stuff is going to be made available to the relevant National Associations in just 2 months. OTOH, I am not in that loop.

>

> Dave

 

 

I suggest you need to look to your own National Association to find out how it is disseminating information on the WHS. The R&A/USGA provided a 2 day training session for representatives of the CONGU countries in April which fully informed us of the WHS system. Scottish Golf mounted a series.of seminars for club officials and members during August and will do so again next spring (we don't implement the WHS till November 2020). A support structure is in place to help Clubs as they inform their memberships. Far from National Associations waiting for a bunch of stuff to be made available to the next two months, a whole bunch of stuff is already out to our clubs. I've no doubt that each of the other CONGU countries - England, Wales and Ireland - will likewise be busy advising the affiliated clubs on the system.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @antip said:

 

> We employ the system already so I can make some observations on these themes based on our outcomes. But note the context here is different to the US, here the competition fields for the men (Wed, Sat, Sun) average around 160 players and everyone plays precisely the same course - and all scores are posted. So we have clear data on how the system algorithms drive the final course scratch rating on the day and how it varies from the (theoretical) course scratch rating. My quick look now over the last year of data tells me about one day out of every 7 it goes up or down by one, one day in 20 it goes up or down by two (from my course's scratch rating of 72) . The variations are more likely to be upward in winter months and downward in summer months but do go in both directions. In my experience, the cause of the variation splits between changed weather conditions (eg big winds one day) and the performance of the players on the day - that is, even when weather conditions are entirely stable on the day, the scratch rating can still move up or down - that is, the entire cohort of players on any given day do not perform consistently with their measured average scores. [Edit, note that the variations in the scratch rating move in opposite direction to the adjustment to the differentials - scratch rating is moved down by the system, your differential goes up for any given score.]

 

The environment in CONGUland is much the same. Mainly large field competitions but the formula is different. My impression is that the effective rating goes up far more often than down. Usually by one stroke, possibly two. It maxes out at 3.

 

Re Colin's comments re national associations. Much the same in England. We will be rolling out our club and member presentations shortly. My county is in the middle of training the presenters and fine tuning the presentations.

 

Incidentally, does anyone know what all these blank advertisements from GolfWRX are all about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Colin L" said:

> > @Newby said:

> > > @antip said:

> >

> > Incidentally, does anyone know what all these blank advertisements from GolfWRX are all about?

>

> I'm not getting blank ones. There's a small ad over to the right of the screen

 

This is what I'm getting

 

https://s3.amazonaws.com/golfwrxforums/uploads/editor/2o/b8en1orpf16s.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @Newby said:

> > @"Colin L" said:

> > > @Newby said:

> > > > @antip said:

> > >

> > > Incidentally, does anyone know what all these blank advertisements from GolfWRX are all about?

> >

> > I'm not getting blank ones. There's a small ad over to the right of the screen

>

> This is what I'm getting

>

> https://s3.amazonaws.com/golfwrxforums/uploads/editor/2o/b8en1orpf16s.png

>

 

Browser with an ad-blocker versus a browser with no ad-blocker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Colin L" said:

> > @DaveLeeNC said:

> > > @Augster said:

> > > Everything you need to know at this time is here:

> > >

> > > https://www.whs.com/

> >

> > I am not sure exactly what we need to know "at this time", but AFAIK the referenced website hasn't been updated for a half year or more. This is their "timeline"

> >

> > _We are planning to make the WHS available for implementation by National Associations beginning in January 2020, after an extensive schedule of testing, communication, promotion and education. _

> >

> > It just doesn't feel like a whole bunch of stuff is going to be made available to the relevant National Associations in just 2 months. OTOH, I am not in that loop.

> >

> > Dave

>

>

> I suggest you need to look to your own National Association to find out how it is disseminating information on the WHS. The R&A/USGA provided a 2 day training session for representatives of the CONGU countries in April which fully informed us of the WHS system. Scottish Golf mounted a series.of seminars for club officials and members during August and will do so again next spring (we don't implement the WHS till November 2020). A support structure is in place to help Clubs as they inform their memberships. Far from National Associations waiting for a bunch of stuff to be made available to the next two months, a whole bunch of stuff is already out to our clubs. I've no doubt that each of the other CONGU countries - England, Wales and Ireland - will likewise be busy advising the affiliated clubs on the system.

>

 

Here in the US various state organizations are kind of the interface between the golfer and the USGA. Where I live the "Carolina's Golf Association" provides course ratings services, posting services (via Ghin in our case), etc. So I have sent the relevant rep (who I have met although it is unlikely that he remembers that) a short set of questions regarding

 

1) Roll out schedule for the WHS

2) Decision on how course handicap will be calculated

3) Are they going to be offering guidance regarding how hole handicaps are calculated now that NDB will be in place (where the 'Match Play Methodology' seems poorly suited to NDB).

 

We'll see what happens here.

 

dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @HatsForBats said:

> > @Newby said:

> > > @"Colin L" said:

> > > > @Newby said:

> > > > > @antip said:

> > > >

> > > > Incidentally, does anyone know what all these blank advertisements from GolfWRX are all about?

> > >

> > > I'm not getting blank ones. There's a small ad over to the right of the screen

> >

> > This is what I'm getting

> >

> > https://s3.amazonaws.com/golfwrxforums/uploads/editor/2o/b8en1orpf16s.png

> >

>

> Browser with an ad-blocker versus a browser with no ad-blocker.

 

Yes. I had worked that bit out but whichever it is they are a b..... nuisance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, in summary my speculation that there is little going on here is quite wrong.

 

I got a response from the CGA that was extremely helpful and detailed. I do not want to become their spokesman (I don't have the required knowledge). But to summarize.

 

1) This will roll out in the Carolina's starting 1/2020

 

2) Course Handicap will reflect the difference between Course Rating and "Par".

 

3) The definition of par is being tightened by the USGA and it will be common for 'Par' to change when going between tees.

 

4) Hole stroke indexes will be determined by the USGA based on course rating data.

 

So in the context of the WHS, this is how it will play out in the US.

 

dave

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @DaveLeeNC said:

> Well, in summary my speculation that there is little going on here is quite wrong.

>

> I got a response from the CGA that was extremely helpful and detailed. I do not want to become their spokesman (I don't have the required knowledge). But to summarize.

>

> 2) Course Handicap will reflect the difference between Course Rating and "Par".

>

> dave

>

 

So have I got this right? The USGA will use the former.

 

CH = H Index * (Slope/113) + (CR - Par)

rather than

CH = H Index * (Slope/113)

 

I think the former is currently used by the EGA.

 

England will be using the latter I believe.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @DaveLeeNC said:

> Well, in summary my speculation that there is little going on here is quite wrong.

>

> I got a response from the CGA that was extremely helpful and detailed. I do not want to become their spokesman (I don't have the required knowledge). But to summarize.

>

> 1) This will roll out in the Carolina's starting 1/2020

>

> 2) Course Handicap will reflect the difference between Course Rating and "Par".

>

> 3) The definition of par is being tightened by the USGA and it will be common for 'Par' to change when going between tees.

>

> 4) Hole stroke indexes will be determined by the USGA based on course rating data.

>

> So in the context of the WHS, this is how it will play out in the US.

>

> dave

>

>

 

I like the idea of #2 until I get to #3. However, there is so little we know about it so I guess we will have to wait until it rolls out to get a better picture. On the surface I think changing the par between tee's might further discourage players from moving up but we will have to see how it is going to work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that I would add is that the definitions of the 'new par', how that works with what we used to know as par, and how that works with the WHS is not completely clear to me. A handful of posts back the (reasonable) statement that 'all you need to know is on the website' was made. Personally I found that level of info less than satisfying. But at this point I am happy to wait with my remaining questions until the system is actually rolled out.

 

dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't recognise what you are referring to as "new par". Par is defined in the WHS rules as the score that a scratch would generally be expected to achieve on a hole under normal course and weather conditions, allowing for two strokes on the putting green. No change there for us. The recommendations for men are below. The distances vary a little from our current guidelines but not significantly.

Par 3: up to 260 yards/240 metres

Par 4: 240 to 490 yards/220 to 450 metres

Par 5: 450 to 710 Yards/410 to 650 metres

Par 6: 670 yards and above /610 metres and above

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Colin L" said:

> I don't recognise what you are referring to as "new par". Par is defined in the WHS rules as the score that a scratch would generally be expected to achieve on a hole under normal course and weather conditions, allowing for two strokes on the putting green. The recommendations for men are below. The distances vary a little from our current guidelines but no more than 10 yards either way.

>

> Par 3: up to 260 yards/240 metres

> Par 4: 240 to 490 yards/220 to 450 metres

> Par 5: 450 to 710 Yards/410 to 650 metres

> Par 6: 670 yards and above /610 metres and above

 

Maybe they'll simply require clubs to change the par depending on the set of tees and gender? For example a hole is 440 yards from the forward tees and 580 from the back. For men it could be a par 4 or a par 5 whereas for women it would be a par 5 or a par 6 depending on the tees.

Swing DNA: 91/4/3/6/6
Woods: ST 180 or MP-650 - Irons: MP-H5 / MP-53 / MP-4, KBS Tour S - 50º: MP-T5 / 55º: FG Tour PMP  / 60º: RTX ZipCore - Mizuno Bettinardi BC-4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Colin L" said:

> I don't recognise what you are referring to as "new par". Par is defined in the WHS rules as the score that a scratch would generally be expected to achieve on a hole under normal course and weather conditions, allowing for two strokes on the putting green. No change there for us. The recommendations for men are below. The distances vary a little from our current guidelines but not significantly.

> Par 3: up to 260 yards/240 metres

> Par 4: 240 to 490 yards/220 to 450 metres

> Par 5: 450 to 710 Yards/410 to 650 metres

> Par 6: 670 yards and above /610 metres and above

 

Like I said - that part was not clear to me. But my contact gave me an example of a course at our club where 'some kind of par' (for the course) would vary from 72 to 62 (in the case of a set of VERY forward tees that this course has).

 

dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @DaveLeeNC said:

> > @"Colin L" said:

> > I don't recognise what you are referring to as "new par". Par is defined in the WHS rules as the score that a scratch would generally be expected to achieve on a hole under normal course and weather conditions, allowing for two strokes on the putting green. No change there for us. The recommendations for men are below. The distances vary a little from our current guidelines but not significantly.

> > Par 3: up to 260 yards/240 metres

> > Par 4: 240 to 490 yards/220 to 450 metres

> > Par 5: 450 to 710 Yards/410 to 650 metres

> > Par 6: 670 yards and above /610 metres and above

>

> Like I said - that part was not clear to me. But my contact gave me an example of a course at our club where 'some kind of par' (for the course) would vary from 72 to 62 (in the case of a set of VERY forward tees that this course has).

>

> dave

 

Sounds a lot like Course Rating rounded to the nearest whole number. If they replaced what is now par with that I think it would be a big mistake but again without any official information it is tough to know how it will actually work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I getting the right impression that at the moment you would have only one par for several different sets of tees no matter the differences in length and the same par for women as for men?

 

I would have expected that each set of tees would be recognised as marking out a discrete _course_ with its own par, course rating and slope rating for men and/or for women.

 

A 10 stroke difference in par between the longest and shortest courses would indicate a significant difference in lengths but not out of the question. A Par 3 course, after all, is rather obviously only Par 54 in total.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Colin L" said:

> Am I getting the right impression that at the moment you would have only one par for several different sets of tees no matter the differences in length and the same par for women as for men?

>

> I would have expected that each set of tees would be recognised as marking out a discrete _course_ with its own par, course rating and slope rating for men and/or for women.

>

>

>

 

In most cases that I have seen in the US, par is unchanged across all the tees (with rare exceptions) for the men. Women get their 'own par' which also does not vary (but may be different from the men's par). This is like a 95+% 'rule'.

 

dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Dave. That just doesn't make sense to me, but I presume each course has, however, its own course and slope rating?

 

There are four sets of tees at my own club, three of them measured and rated for men. Each has a different par: 70, 69 and 66. Each will have its own course and slope rating for the WHS.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Colin L" said:

> I don't recognise what you are referring to as "new par". Par is defined in the WHS rules as the score that a scratch would generally be expected to achieve on a hole under normal course and weather conditions, allowing for two strokes on the putting green. No change there for us. The recommendations for men are below. The distances vary a little from our current guidelines but not significantly.

> Par 3: up to 260 yards/240 metres

> Par 4: 240 to 490 yards/220 to 450 metres

> Par 5: 450 to 710 Yards/410 to 650 metres

> Par 6: 670 yards and above /610 metres and above

 

I may be worth mentioning that currently, the distances vary from handicapping authority to handicapping authority. In addition, some are recommendations and some are mandatory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Colin L" said:

> Thanks Dave. That just doesn't make sense to me, but I presume each course has, however, its own course and slope rating?

>

> There are four sets of tees at my own club, three of them measured and rated for men. Each has a different par: 70, 69 and 66. Each will have its own course and slope rating for the WHS.

>

>

>

 

Naturally all different sets of tees have and will have their own CR and Slope for men and women but I can't recall a single course in Finland with different par numbers for different genders or tees.

Swing DNA: 91/4/3/6/6
Woods: ST 180 or MP-650 - Irons: MP-H5 / MP-53 / MP-4, KBS Tour S - 50º: MP-T5 / 55º: FG Tour PMP  / 60º: RTX ZipCore - Mizuno Bettinardi BC-4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> @"Colin L" said:

> Thanks Dave. That just doesn't make sense to me, but I presume each course has, however, its own course and slope rating?

>

> There are four sets of tees at my own club, three of them measured and rated for men. Each has a different par: 70, 69 and 66. Each will have its own course and slope rating for the WHS.

>

>

>

 

Each set of tees has its own CR and Slope. But different pars is unusual. dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • 2024 Valspar Championship WITB Photos (Thanks to bvmagic)- Discussion & Links to Photos
      This weeks WITB Pics are from member bvmagic (Brian). Brian's first event for WRX was in 2008 at Bayhill while in college. Thanks so much bv.
       
      Please put your comments or question on this thread. Links to all the threads are below...
       
       
       
       
      • 31 replies
    • 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #3
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Matt (LFG) Every - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Sahith Theegala - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Cameron putters (and new "LD" grip) - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Bettinardi MB & CB irons - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Bettinardi API putter cover - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Swag API covers - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Golf Pride Reverse Taper grips - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 15 replies
    • 2024 Cognizant Classic - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #1
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #2
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #3
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #4
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Brandt Snedeker - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Max Greyserman - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Eric Cole - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Carl Yuan - WITb - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Russell Henley - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Justin Sun - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alex Noren - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Shane Lowry - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Taylor Montgomery - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jake Knapp (KnappTime_ltd) - WITB - - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Super Stoke Pistol Lock 1.0 & 2.0 grips - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      LA Golf new insert putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Garsen Quad Tour 15 grip - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Swag covers - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jacob Bridgeman's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Bud Cauley's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Ryo Hisatsune's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Chris Kirk - new black Callaway Apex CB irons and a few Odyssey putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alejandro Tosti's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      • 2 replies
    • 2024 Genesis Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #3
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #4
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Rory McIlroy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Sepp Straka - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Patrick Rodgers - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Brendon Todd - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Denny McCarthy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Corey Conners - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Chase Johnson - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tommy Fleetwood - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Matt Fitzpatrick - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Si Woo Kim - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Viktor Hovland - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Wyndham Clark - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Cam Davis - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Nick Taylor - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Ben Baller WITB update (New putter, driver, hybrid and shafts) – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Vortex Golf rangefinder - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Fujikura Ventus shaft - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods & TaylorMade "Sun Day Red" apparel launch event, product photos – 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods Sun Day Red golf shoes - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Aretera shafts - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Toulon putters - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods' new white "Sun Day Red" golf shoe prototypes – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      • 22 replies
    • 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put and questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open - Monday #1
      2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open - Monday #2
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Ben Taylor - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Garrick Higgo - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Billy Horschel - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Justin Lower - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Lanto Griffin - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Bud Cauley - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Corbin Burnes (2021 NL Cy Young) - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Greyson Sigg - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Charley Hoffman - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Nico Echavarria - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Victor Perez - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Sami Valimaki - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Ryo Hisatsune - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      Jake Knapp's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      New Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Tyler Duncan's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Greyson Sigg's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Sunjae Im's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Ping's Waste Management putter covers - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Vincent Whaley's custom Cameron - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Odyssey Waste Management putter covers - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Super Stroke custom grips - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Zac Blair's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Bettinardi Waste Management putter covers - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
       
       
       
       
       
       

       
      • 12 replies

×
×
  • Create New...