Tiger Specs Screenshot?

[Yankeesfan27]

[quote name='BigGameDb' timestamp='1369842753' post='7128074']
Does Tiger play the Ion version of the Diamanas?
[/quote]

Not positive but I don't think so. Don't quote me on it though

[ksavy17]

he doesnt use the ion plated versions

[drbonesvt]

[quote name='golfpros1' timestamp='1369107369' post='7073710']
I love how people get so caught up in the custom fit marketing, when a player like woods, who's 6'1", plays basically clubs right off the shelf (other then being about 2 degrees weaker than todays standards in lofts).
[/quote]

Tiger [u]Might be 6'[/u] on a good day, I always thought he was taller also, but got next to him at tourney(07') us open @ oakmont. Big dude though, definitely miles away from his younger (Standford and 97' masters) build.

[prhiam]

[quote name='scottvw13' timestamp='1369840404' post='7127742']
[quote name='BigGameDb' timestamp='1369840023' post='7127680']
Wonder if this "Covert Limited" line doesn't include the Nike swoosh on the club head like Tiger's 3 and 5 woods.
[/quote]

Actually it depends on the size of the clubhead.

According to Nike, their engineers discovered that your eye cannot see anything more than 1.25 inches (I believe that was the number) away from the ball. That is why the Swoosh is where it is on the Coverts. And I have to tell you, not once has it become a distraction for me.

So, if the limited clubhead is significantly smaller than the other lines, there may not be room for the swoosh, because it will be less than 1.25 inches from the ball
[/quote]

I completely agree with this, the swoosh is totally unnoticeable while standing over a ball. I have no clue it's even there, and the red has become very comforting.

[tommytom11]

[quote name='drbonesvt' timestamp='1369843809' post='7128214']
[quote name='golfpros1' timestamp='1369107369' post='7073710']
I love how people get so caught up in the custom fit marketing, when a player like woods, who's 6'1", plays basically clubs right off the shelf (other then being about 2 degrees weaker than todays standards in lofts).
[/quote]

Tiger [u]Might be 6'[/u] on a good day, I always thought he was taller also, but got next to him at tourney(07') us open @ oakmont. Big dude though, definitely miles away from his younger (Standford and 97' masters) build.
[/quote]

i've been right next to him several times and he is definitely 6'1

[szaino]

[quote name='dave willie' timestamp='1329180492' post='4279785']
I think the "+2 3/2" typo on the screenshot actually should read "+2 3/4". 8.5* + 2 3/4* = 11.25* effective loft.
[/quote]

My understanding was:
plus face angle = closed
minus face angle = open.

So then above would make sense. closed adds to effective loft. I find it hard to believe that Tiger plays witha 2 3/4 closed face?

[scottvw13]

[quote name='szaino' timestamp='1369865178' post='7130628']
[quote name='dave willie' timestamp='1329180492' post='4279785']
I think the "+2 3/2" typo on the screenshot actually should read "+2 3/4". 8.5* + 2 3/4* = 11.25* effective loft.
[/quote]

My understanding was:
plus face angle = closed
minus face angle = open.

So then above would make sense. closed adds to effective loft. I find it hard to believe that Tiger plays witha 2 3/4 closed face?
[/quote]

I may be able to get confirmation, but that said, I'd be SHOCKED if tiger was playing a closed face anything.

Especially when you consider how hard he releases and he plays generally a cut...

[tommytom11]

[quote name='scottvw13' timestamp='1369875623' post='7131608']
[quote name='szaino' timestamp='1369865178' post='7130628']
[quote name='dave willie' timestamp='1329180492' post='4279785']
I think the "+2 3/2" typo on the screenshot actually should read "+2 3/4". 8.5* + 2 3/4* = 11.25* effective loft.
[/quote]

My understanding was:
plus face angle = closed
minus face angle = open.

So then above would make sense. closed adds to effective loft. I find it hard to believe that Tiger plays witha 2 3/4 closed face?
[/quote]

I may be able to get confirmation, but that said, I'd be SHOCKED if tiger was playing a closed face anything.

Especially when you consider how hard he releases and he plays generally a cut...
[/quote]

+ is open

[szaino]

[quote name='tommytom11' timestamp='1369876369' post='7131690']
[quote name='scottvw13' timestamp='1369875623' post='7131608']
[quote name='szaino' timestamp='1369865178' post='7130628']
[quote name='dave willie' timestamp='1329180492' post='4279785']
I think the "+2 3/2" typo on the screenshot actually should read "+2 3/4". 8.5* + 2 3/4* = 11.25* effective loft.
[/quote]

My understanding was:
plus face angle = closed
minus face angle = open.

So then above would make sense. closed adds to effective loft. I find it hard to believe that Tiger plays witha 2 3/4 closed face?
[/quote]

I may be able to get confirmation, but that said, I'd be SHOCKED if tiger was playing a closed face anything.

Especially when you consider how hard he releases and he plays generally a cut...
[/quote]

+ is open
[/quote]

Then his club can't be a static 8.5* of loft because he would then be hitting with an effective loft of 5.75* which is kind of off he charts. If it is 2 3/4 open the driver loft must be adjusted to 14* to get to the 11.25* number.

[scottvw13]

[quote name='szaino' timestamp='1369877236' post='7131810']

Then his club can't be a static 8.5* of loft because he would then be hitting with an effective loft of 5.75* which is kind of off he charts. If it is 2 3/4 open the driver loft must be adjusted to 14* to get to the 11.25* number.
[/quote]

Work the other way.

His ACTUAL loft is 11.25 to get to 8.5 actual loft.

I have an OVEN ISSUED VRS Hybrid with 16.25 loft that is 2.5 open and plays 14 actual.

[szaino]

[quote name='scottvw13' timestamp='1369877746' post='7131886']
[quote name='szaino' timestamp='1369877236' post='7131810']
Then his club can't be a static 8.5* of loft because he would then be hitting with an effective loft of 5.75* which is kind of off he charts. If it is 2 3/4 open the driver loft must be adjusted to 14* to get to the 11.25* number.
[/quote]

Work the other way.

His ACTUAL loft is 11.25 to get to 8.5 actual loft.

I have an OVEN ISSUED VRS Hybrid with 16.25 loft that is 2.5 open and plays 14 actual.
[/quote]

Your math makes sense and I agree.

But, why does it say theat he has a VR tour driver 8.5*. I don't think these have the adjustable hosel (not sure actually), so you mean to say he has a driver marked as 8.5* but it has been bent to the 11.25* and 2 3/4 open? Now that doesn't make sense.

[szaino]

Actually, maybe the VR tour driver does have an adjustable hosel. Can't seem to find much on the Nike website, but I did find a picture elsewhere.

[youngun87]

[quote name='szaino' timestamp='1369918256' post='7134090']
Actually, maybe the VR tour driver does have an adjustable hosel. Can't seem to find much on the Nike website, but I did find a picture elsewhere.
[/quote]

No it does not. He has a driver marked 8.5* but the actual loft is 11.25*. The manufacturing tolerances can allow for this type of discrepancy.

[Darth_Fader]

Does anyone know the full specs of his wedges? Lofts, bounches, grinds, swing weights, etc.?

 

The image on the screen was cut off :(

 

Thanks in advance!

 

Cheers

[Lenny2]

If anyone screenshot it just post it again, keep posting it regardless of if a moderator or the poster took it down. Are we sure it was not this one .

 

[golfinguru11]

Never knew he played soft stepped x100s.

[CallawayLefty]

> @golfinguru11 said:

> Never knew he played soft stepped x100s.

 

Where are you seeing soft stepped? I’m not seeing it.

[Steele47]

What sticks out to me is his PW and 9 iron are at 63 deg lie angle, 8 iron 62 deg.. The man is 6 foot 1 or so? Standard lie angle off the rack for most OEM's PW is 64 deg. And yes I understand difference between between static and dynamic but have always been surprised by uprightish standard lie angles from manufacturers.

[golfinguru11]

> @CallawayLefty said:

> > @golfinguru11 said:

> > Never knew he played soft stepped x100s.

>

> Where are you seeing soft stepped? I’m not seeing it.

 

The raw lengths of the shafts.

[golfinguru11]

> @Steele47 said:

> What sticks out to me is his PW and 9 iron are at 63 deg lie angle, 8 iron 62 deg.. The man is 6 foot 1 or so? Standard lie angle off the rack for most OEM's PW is 64 deg. And yes I understand difference between between static and dynamic but have always been surprised by uprightish standard lie angles from manufacturers.

 

he grew up playing mizunos @ 63 pw lie.

[er1cchandler]

From Peter Finch’s latest video on the P7-TW irons

 

 

[CallawayLefty]

> @golfinguru11 said:

> > @CallawayLefty said:

> > > @golfinguru11 said:

> > > Never knew he played soft stepped x100s.

> >

> > Where are you seeing soft stepped? I’m not seeing it.

>

> The raw lengths of the shafts.

 

Those are not soft stepped raw lengths. 37 is the length for both the wedge and 9 iron and they go up in half inch increments from there.

[Darth_Fader]

Does anyone know his wedge specs? They were cut off from the photo. Thanks in advance!

[Golfnutgalen]

> @mintonma said:

> 49/53/58 wedge set up seems pretty unique to me.

 

Is this correct? Like the others I never saw the full spreadsheet, but the rest of the iron lofts exactly match so I'm guessing yes? I always thought for sure Tiger had a big gap between his sand and pitching wedge.

[b2bbirdies]

> @Golfnutgalen said:

> > @mintonma said:

> > 49/53/58 wedge set up seems pretty unique to me.

>

> Is this correct? Like the others I never saw the full spreadsheet, but the rest of the iron lofts exactly match so I'm guessing yes? I always thought for sure Tiger had a big gap between his sand and pitching wedge.

 

Pretty sure it's the same as when he had the Mp-14s in the bag. 50, 56, 60

[mesegrn]

Do you think the lengths on the spreadsheet are cut or gripped? If its cut length, can I assume an additional 1/4 inch for the butt of the grip?