Callaway Mavrik, Mavrik Max, Mavrik Pro irons (in-hand photos)

[GolfWRX]

Callaway Mavrik, Mavrik Max, Mavrik Pro irons (in-hand photos).

Callaway Mavrik Pro irons (in-hand photos)

Callaway Mavrik (in-hand photos)

Callaway Mavrik Max Irons (in-hand photos)

 

 

[vman]

Oh no, definitely not their best looking effort.

[Eeecc]

Damn that offset...looks like someone stepped on the iron. That goose neck is suffering some severe bends.

[rgk5]

For their intended market the non-Pro models are fine.

[Warrick]

Never been a callaway iron guy, and holy offset on a those max.

I actually think the Pro model looks decent.

[doublepar93]

Offset for days.

[jwb10]

Clunky

[rukahs]

Goodness me.

 

Callaway. This just isn't it. Nope.

 

[rukahs]

 

[MojoEd]

[CAREFUL what you say guys, you don’t want Cally’s AI supercomputer mad at you! ?]

Yes sir, those are some mighty fine looking irons! Mighty fine!

[shakey]

Pro version looks ok. With my deteriorating game, it’s prob something I should consider. They would have to be way more forgiving than the 919 Tours I played most of last year.

[vinprun71]

Pro looks good actually. The other two are quite chunky. Offset is wild too.

[scooterhd2]

when the offset has offset.

[Break68]

I have played Callaway since 2004. I really don't think I could play an iron that says MAVRIK on them.

[QuigleyDU]

Another hollow iron? Well if you can beat um...

[dhen9]

Almost thirty years ago we heard the same things about "metal woods".

[Carolina Golfer 2]

It really does look like that!

[tbowles411]

We have to remember who these are for. That screams, "THIS IS NOT GOING TO SLICE!"

[radiman]

The iron may look it, but it's actually not hollow. There is a tungsten/microsphere weight behind the face. The badge sits out further, so I can see how it would appear that way. But, it's not hollow in the sense of other irons (PXG, P790, i500, etc).

[HitBombs]

Actually the new blade or a photoshop? Looks like a rebadged apex mb, if it’s the actual new mb that looks pretty nice to me

[bulls9999]

Good golly, that is one of the UGLYIEST OF OFFSET irons that I've seen in a long time (was it run over by a car or visually distorted, or is that really the offset?). No need to try those... except maybe the 'Pro' (takes the 'pro' to get the ugly orange off the badge?).

[third-times-a-charm]

Haha holy offset...wow. Gooseneck!

 

With that said the Pro model doesnt look bad - I just can't get myself to use 'big box set irons' like these that have the same names as drivers/woods.

[Carolina Golfer 2]

Oh yeah, I get that, and never mind a little offset in my life! ButThe Pro looks pretty good. But even the standard version Mavrik seems to have quite a bit more offset than say the T300 or G410.

[ChristopherMcDonald]

Man that's a crazy amount of offset

[mm2983]

I'm confused. How does the Pro fit in with the Apex and Apex Pro?

[dhen9]

Doesn't really fit it per say. Think of it as a similar profile to CF19 and Epic but a budget friendly option.

[GoGoErky]

Well wouldn’t the pxg and p790s not be considered hollow then since they are foam injected

[trouble]

I like the pros. I would game them.

[staysober for golf]

i could game the 4 & 5 Max, all about making it easy on that end. so sure why not :0)

[DMartini]

Pro looks great, X Forged Star looking, would get them bent to trad lofts throw some DG in them and game for sure.

interesting that the std steel shaft is a 105g Elevate, i think from memory the XR Pro (which i have a soft spot for) came with KBS Tour 90 as factory steel option, didnt like the look of Rogue Pro one bit so cant comment on what came in them, Cally keeping factory installed steel shafts around the 90 - 105/110g range for these type/line/style of clubs?

the 3 iron loft in the Mav Pro is 19* same as the new Epic Forged & the Epic Pro before it, is this line with its supercharged lofts aimed at older gents who have payed players cav back or blades in the past but have lost club head speed & strength?