Jump to content

4 Year old driver vs New Driver Test


tangojay

Recommended Posts

I bought a XR-16 Driver with Matrix Ozik 6X3 White Tie when it was released in 2016.

Last week I decided it was time for a new driver,,,, so I took my 4 year old driver and tested it against the new Callaway EPIC Flash and EPIC Flash Sub Zero ( I did not try any other driver since I wanted to use same shaft and oversize grip) with a dozen original Kirkland 4 piece balls (which is my current ball).

After warming up , the test started, I did not want to look at monitor until it was over in order to not be influenced. The results? NO noticeable difference !!! The numbers that I remember the most was the fact that all three had very similar numbers in regards to ball speed, club speed, distance and dispersion. If memory serves me right, the EPIC Flash did give me about 1 to 2 yards more distance, but for $529, no, not enough!

That made me think, if ALL drivers have to be .83 COR, then ALL drivers since this standard was implemented should hit the ball the same distance? I realize someone with a 105 MPH club head speed will outdrive me with my 93 MPH average club speed.

So is this "more distance" nothing more than marketing? I would love to see a 5 year old and current driver be robot tested.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recently bought a SLDR driver and I think it's as long as anything I have owned

Titleist TSR3 9.25* Tensei 1K Black 65S 45.75"
Titleist TSR2 16.5 Tensei 1K Black 75S 43.25"
Titleist TSR3 19* Tensei 1K Black 75S 42.75" 
Titleist TSR3 3H 19* Tensei 1kB Black 85s 40.5"
Fourteen TC 920 5-PW Project X LZ 6.0
Fourteen DJ-4 48* Project X IO 6.0
Fourteen DJ-5 54* Project X IO 6.0

Fourteen DJ-4 58* Project X IO 6.0
2023 Odyssey Jailbird MH 39"  
2023 Vice Pro Lime

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgiveness for missing the center, thats what ive seen in new drivers, but added distance, not really... I did however add some stability with the new Mavrik that I like.

But no, you aren’t missing a lot, that is for certain. I mean look at today, im sure Taylormade’s marketing team is very angry that Nick Taylor won today with a 2017 M2.

  • Like 1

Driver - Who knows!?

Ping G430 3W  15@14 Ventus Black 8X

Taylormade TPMC 2011 3-4 X100

Titleist 716MB 5-PW X100

Ping Glide 3.0 50, 55, 60 SS X100 50-55, S400 60

Odyssey White Hot Pro Rossie 36" CB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it ironic that drivers (supposedly "packed" with tech) are of little difference in performance over several years? I believe that 0.83 COR no. was settled from 2006 onwards.

Just like the countless threads of solid 1 pc. mb and cb irons. Those don't really change for the golfer either, other than sole grinds and bounce.

I enjoy rotating in my old Titleist 910 D2 still with several others from 2016-18 and only notice some sound differences on impact.

BAG ONE:                                                                                                   BAG TWO:
D - Callaway Rogue ST Max D                                               - Cobra F9 Tour Length  

5 -  Ping G425 Max 5(16.5)                                                    3 -  TEE C721 Pro 3 HL(16.5)

H - Callaway Mav P (18) Titleist TS2 (21)                              H - TM SF 2.0 (18) & (21)

I -  Titleist T300 4                                                                   I -  Taylormade SIM Max 4      
I -  Titleist T100 5-P/MR KK TiNi 105                                     I -  Taylormade P760 5-P/Recoils 110 F4

W - Vokey SM8 52, Vokey SM6 58                                        W - Vokey SM8 52, Vokey SM6 58 
P - Bellum Winmore Midi  787                                                - Guerin TS Black 370

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an XR16 driver as well. Took it to the range late last year and hit it against the Epic Flash and The Rogue. No difference in distance or forgiveness. I was not fitted for the driver and stuck my old favorite shaft into it.

Still, I am going to do a full driver fitting this spring to really see what's what in the pot.

 

Callaway Rogue Max LS Driver, 9 degrees, Tensei Blue shaft

Mizuno ST180 5 wood

Ping G425 Max 7 wood
Srixon ZX4 4 iron
Srixon ZX5 irons 5-PW, Nippon N.S. Pro Modus 3 Tour 120 shafts

Cleveland RTX6 48* wedge

Cleveland Zipcore 54* wedge
Cleveland RTX 58* full face wedge
Nike Method Core Drone 2.0 putter 34"
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are tons of other factors for each golfer besides just COR. Launch, spin, delivery variables, forgiveness, strike point, confidence, face depth, rate of closure due to design or settings, aerodynamics, shafts, grips, ball choice, tee height, I could go on all day.

ONOFF Labospec 358 — Tour AD TP6
Titleist TS2 16.5* — Kuro Kage XM 80
Justick Proceed 21* UT — Nippon GOST 
Mizuno MP-20 HMB/MB— MITSUBISHI MMT 105/125
Mizuno T20 50* and 55* — MITSUBISHI MMT 125
Seven ST 61* Black Boron — MCI Black 125 “mild”
Epon Ltd Edition I-33 — Matrix PZ-125 Shaft 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That’s basically what I’ve seen as well. I’m of the belief that the class of 2016 and 2017 drivers are the best overall collection of drivers. 2016-2017 M2, with the 2016 being a legend. 2017 M1- super beast Cobra LTD/LTD Pro- for my money, the best Cobra driver ever. The OG 2017 Callaway Epic Sub Zero, such a beast, super forgiving with heavy weight in the back and super long- my favorite Cally driver. The g400LST came out in end of summer 2017- beast driver also....

I test everything against my LTD Pro and nothing has beat it yet. For me the combination of low spin and forgiveness is unmatched.

  • Like 1

Callaway Paradym Triple 💎 10.5* Ventus Blue 6X/TR 6S
Titleist TSR2 16.5* (Set to 15.75*) Tour AD DI 7S
Titleist TSR2 18* Hybrid Tour AD IZ 85S
Titleist u505 4i (21*) Tour AD DI 95S

Srixon Zx7 MK II 5-PW, 51* AW - Modus 105S
Callaway Jaws 56*-Jaws Full Toe 60*-  DG 115 TI S200

Toulon Garage Custom Las Vegas H7 35”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you literally never miss the centre then yes, you could play with a mid-2000s 0.83 COR driver and not much would be different.

On average, across the face and factoring in MOI, there have probably been some advancements for most. I.e does your AVERAGE drive go farther?

That being said, I'd be surprised if it is 10 yards total vs a 2010 club (assuming both are well fit to a players swing). And depending on the individual, anything within the last couple to few cycles may actually work thr best.

I do feel like my 915D4 may be trending towards the obsolete category. But it's not like I'd hit it 20 yards farther just by spending $500+ on a new setup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said before, I took the shaft from my 4 year old driver, installed it on a new model plus used the SAME golf ball,,,thus the differences were minimal to none, what your are describing does not apply if all variables have been minimized.

I could not say the same if I tested my gamer against say a PING 410 max with their standard shaft and grip,,, that alone inserts two variables into the test, the shaft and the grip which is standard in all OEM clubs, I have rather large paws ( two wraps under a oversize grip)

I am sorry but what you describe sounds like the marketing we hear from companies, I would LOVE if someone at GolfWRX took up the challenge and tested via robot, a current driver, 5 year and 10 year driver with identical specs, but the chances of that are nil since I pretty sure their results would be close to mine and would place a dent in their marketing strategy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's what your experience tells me:

For better or worse, your current driver and the ones you tested were equally good (or bad?) fits for you. Your swing speed hasn't changed in the last four years.The experiment that you did is in NO way a club fitting, and doesn't speak to whether or not there is a better driver out there FOR YOU.You don't explain how you came about your original combination four years ago, but this reminds me of the Crossfield videos in which he hits pretty much identical setups of Ping drivers all the way back to the G20 and gets similar results; of course, that's not really the issue. The real question in any true club fitting is whether or not there is another combination that will give you better results, by tweaking launch angles or spin rates or whatever. Of course a lot of distance marketing is hype; that's what advertising is. But there is ZERO doubt that all combinations aren't equal.

I'm getting old, and I'm losing swing speed. I battle that like crazy; lessons for better technique, golf-specific fitness work, etc. But I've done it with drivers, too. I got back 10 yards in 2015 by increasing carry thru lower spin, and I got 10 yards back in 2018 by adding 3 mph of clubhead speed with a 440 cc head instead of a 460. In each case, I was replacing a driver that I had been carefully fitted for, and the interval, coincidentally, was 4 years. In each case, the loft and the shaft that I ended up with were at least slightly different than what I had been fitted for previously, but I don't doubt that if I had hit the same setup in a newer generation that my results wouldn't have been much different.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, then I would be driving 450 yard par 4s, where is the fun in that. It's a Tour issue 460 that I bought of ebay for $89. I love it.

Titleist TSR3 9.25* Tensei 1K Black 65S 45.75"
Titleist TSR2 16.5 Tensei 1K Black 75S 43.25"
Titleist TSR3 19* Tensei 1K Black 75S 42.75" 
Titleist TSR3 3H 19* Tensei 1kB Black 85s 40.5"
Fourteen TC 920 5-PW Project X LZ 6.0
Fourteen DJ-4 48* Project X IO 6.0
Fourteen DJ-5 54* Project X IO 6.0

Fourteen DJ-4 58* Project X IO 6.0
2023 Odyssey Jailbird MH 39"  
2023 Vice Pro Lime

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But you haven't 'minimized the differences' just by playing the same shaft/grip combo in two different heads. You have no idea from a real technical standpoint which of those two drivers launch higher/lower, spin more/less, like to come in open/closed add loft/subtract loft due to CG placement, have a shallower/deeper face, perform better/worse on mis-hits, are more/less aerodynamic, etc. Not to mention the psychological impact of playing a familiar driver vs. a new one and what that means for how a club gets tested.

These variables (plus many more) may or may not add up to increased yardage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Bluedot, all you proved is that your 4 year old shaft is ok for you and Callaway heads haven't changed too much. Which seems reasonable since the Epic Flash isn't even this years model, so the difference between your driver and an epic flash is more like two years. The other problem is the new driver is more than just a clubhead, you didn't try different shafts, or lofts, or lies, or grips. You didn't even look at your shots till the end so it wasn't a fitting.

Any person on this forum knows by now that changing just the driver head alone is not getting someone 10-15 yards. We all know about marketing. But what we all also should know is that a new driver properly fit can help. But you did not properly fit yourself. But hey maybe you haven't changed at all in four years assuming you were fit for the old one then fine save your money. But the next guy with a four year old driver who wasn't fit could probably go out get fit to a new driver and pick up some yards.

  • Like 1

Titleist TSI2 9.0 Tensei 1k White 50 TX
Ping G430 Max 3w Ventus Black 7x
Ping G430 19 Hybrid Ventus Blue 8x
Titleist TSI2 4 Hybrid Tenseit White 90x
Titleist T200 5 Iron PX 6.5

Titleist T100S 6-PW PX 6.5

Vokey SM8 49 PX 6.5 SM8 54 PX 6.5
Taylormade Hi toe 60 KBS tour V 115
Toulon Atlanta 35"
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Probably the most meaningful thing you can take away from your findings is that you have a shaft that fits you pretty well.

  • Like 2
ONOFF Labospec 358 — Tour AD TP6
Titleist TS2 16.5* — Kuro Kage XM 80
Justick Proceed 21* UT — Nippon GOST 
Mizuno MP-20 HMB/MB— MITSUBISHI MMT 105/125
Mizuno T20 50* and 55* — MITSUBISHI MMT 125
Seven ST 61* Black Boron — MCI Black 125 “mild”
Epon Ltd Edition I-33 — Matrix PZ-125 Shaft 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does he though? He didn't post any numbers. He didn't say they were optimal, just similar among heads and likely what he expects out of his club. Doesn't mean he has been fit and optimized.

Titleist TSI2 9.0 Tensei 1k White 50 TX
Ping G430 Max 3w Ventus Black 7x
Ping G430 19 Hybrid Ventus Blue 8x
Titleist TSI2 4 Hybrid Tenseit White 90x
Titleist T200 5 Iron PX 6.5

Titleist T100S 6-PW PX 6.5

Vokey SM8 49 PX 6.5 SM8 54 PX 6.5
Taylormade Hi toe 60 KBS tour V 115
Toulon Atlanta 35"
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

XR16 is such a great golf driver. It is so easily to hit and equally long in distance when compare to most of the newer Callaway drivers.

(I added some lead tape at the bottom near the club face to reduced spin)

However, the Mavrik is different. I can clearly see an 8-10 yrds gain between the XR16 and the Mavrik SubZero. But I am not sure how consistency of the Mavrik vs the XR16 since I am so confidence with the XR16 already. I will test some more to compare before I make my final decision.

BTW, the Mavrik sound so good.....

  • Callaway Rogue ST Triple Diamond LS 9* Driver - Mitsubishi TENSEI AV White 75 Graphite
  • Callaway Rogue ST Max 3HL Wood - Mitsubishi TENSEI AV White 75 Graphite
  • Callaway Apex Utility Wood 3UW - Project X HZRDUS Smoke RDX 6.0 80
  • Taylormade P.790 4-PW - 
  • Ben Hogan Equalize Wedges 54* & 58* - KBS Tour V  S                            
  • 2020 Toulon Design Chicago Stain Chrome                                                                                                                  
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the "not enough data/this isn't scientific" posts, and i'll tell you why.

Most of the objective "gains" made in the last 5 years have been related to adjustability and forgiveness (both ball speed retention on mishits AND MOI related accuracy gains). The XR16 is a bit of an outlier in the Callaway lineup, even an outlier among the XR16 line (Pro, Subzero). It is sort of like the 2016 M2 in that regard in that its specs give it a longer shelf life than many other drivers. It is high MOI and mid/high CG, virtually in the exact same spot in terms of CG as the Taylormade M5 with the weights back.

This is why you can't just randomly compare clubs without knowing specs (not your fault, virtually no OEMs publish these things) because you run the risk of drawing wonky conclusions. And also, with all due respect, at 93mph you are not likely to be reaping the same benefits as someone with higher speeds. As you get faster, spin control and overall head stability become more and more important with ill-fitting drivers doing a lot more damage at those higher speeds. Whatever your bad "miss" is, it would likely be significantly worse at higher speeds, and that is where some of the advancements in recent years come in to play.

With all that said, we're still talking about incremental gains here, nothing revolutionary. Your XR16 will serve you perfectly fine for many years, and it sounds like you have a solid shaft and grip combo as well. The White Tie has a very simple, smooth bend profile that would likely suit a lot of people. If you ever felt like experimenting, the Aldila Rogue Black and Evenlow Blue/Red are similar shafts.

  • Like 2

Titleist TSi3 9* Tensei AV White 65TX 2.0 // Taylormade SIM 9* Ventus TR Blue 6TX
Taylormade Stealth+ 16.5* Ventus Black 8x // Taylormade SIM Ti V2 16.5* Ventus TR Blue 7X
Callaway Apex UW 19* Ventus Black 8x // Srixon ZX Utility MKII 18* Graphite Design AD-IZ 95X
Callaway X-Forged Single Diamond 22* Nippon GOST Hybrid Tour X 
Bridgestone 
J40 DPC 4i-7i 24*- 35* Brunswick Precision Rifle FCM 7.0
Bridgestone J40 CB 8i-PW 39*- 48* Brunswick Precision Rifle FCM 7.0

Taylormade Milled Grind Raw 54* Brunswick Precision Rifle FCM 7.0
Vokey SM6 58* Oil Can Low Bounce K-Grind Brunswick Precision Rifle FCM 7.0
Scotty Cameron Newport Tour Red Dot || Taylormade Spider X Navy Slant

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WOW! Never thought so many people would feel this way! Many of you are saying the same words I hear in adds. All

What I did in my opinion , was a very simple un-scientific test, same shaft and grip in two drivers, same company. The new driver which the company claims will increase my distance and decrease my dispersion for $529, so I put it up against a 4 year old driver from the same company. The new driver did not deliver.

Many of you keep asking for numbers and numbers,, the numbers that mattered to me were the distance and dispersions, funny thing is that a tracker at the PGA Superstore said I hit my PING G700 7 iron 195 on the fly,,, real life I hit it a constant 163-165, so numbers lie.

finally, wouldn’t you people love to have a robotic golfer hit a 10 , 5 year old and current driver from same company with same specs and see the results ? I would!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think anybody is saying what the ads say, and I don't think anybody would disagree that the monitors in big box stores are not to be trusted. FORGET ADVERTISING; nobody is talking about that, and nobody disagrees with you that distance advertising is largely hype.

What we ARE saying is that testing the same shaft in different heads by the same OEM isn't club fitting AT ALL and in no way speaks to whether or not there is more distance available to you. That's not marketing hype; it's real IF there are combinations of heads and lofts and shafts that would give you better results. There may not be, but the odds are against that, and you'll never know if you don't do some actual testing.

You say that your swing speed is 93 mph, but you don't mention the loft of the head you are using, or the lofts of the heads that you tried, or the flex of that shaft. THAT is why people are wondering what your numbers are; it isn't some weird obsession with random numbers, just data that is used to figure out what's optimal for your particular swing. I don't go to fittings to get numbers; I go to fittings to get results; at a driver fitting, I might hit a half dozen heads and a half dozen shafts; a good driver fitting takes at least an hour, at least in my experience, and a good fitter can fine tune the parameters until you can be pretty sure that you're getting everything that there is to be had.

If you don't want to go thru that process, that's well and good, and if you don't want to spend big bucks for a new driver that's completely understandable. But plugging the shaft that you already use into a couple of heads from the same company, then thinking that the results prove that there isn't more distance available to you lacks any scientific validity.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It's funny the lengths that people will go to justify the kool aid. The simple reality is if the driver you had fit you for launch and spin, then you will see minimal gains with the newer stuff. You will see better off center numbers but on the screws very minimal. The only differences between my G30 and the G410 is the feel and sound.

Maltby KE4 TC Max MPF Pro Stiff
Callaway Rogue 3W Synergy 60

Maltby KE4 Tour TC 19*, 22* Matrix  HX3 White Tie
Taylormade Burner TP Japan Issue 5-PW DG120

Callaway MD4 Raw 52*, 58* DG115
Maltby PTM-5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robot would not answer the question as human is no where near a robot.

 

long post here we go,

 

1) COR is not the sanction measurement to be clear, generically .830 is used, BUT what is actually used is CT (Characteristic of time)

1a) The Current LIMIT is 239units +/- 18 for a total max of 257 units. Manufactures measure THIS, not the COR for conforming numbers.

 

Is there a difference between your XR16 and a current Maverik

Subtle but could be different.

 

1) Basis of SPECS I noticed one thing people forget to check Total length of clubs Most clubs are moving to the 45.5 to 45.75" and even some 46" (Cameron champ and TW playing 44"ish drivers)

2) Spin characteristics. from SLDR large weight forward to reduce spin to ultra forgiving rearward weights.... MOI is affected.

3) If the Optimal max face is capped at .830 or 257 ct units, the bigger better part is outside of the optimal zone. example, 1/8th of an inch from optimal zone (center) the drop off would be .730 COR or 210 ct units. But possible new clubs and NEWER designs are able to somehow retain a greater amount of ball speed from the 1/8th inch. Due to technology (Jail break, CNC face, Twist face etc etc) They CANNOT exceed the current limits, but there is drop offs further away from center so they can surely do things to increase these areas to mitigate substantial drop offs.

3a) Example I can generically assume, take the 07 Burner one of the most forgiving drivers of its generation. say we fit it to a player in addition to a Sim MAX driver, same specs, shafts, weight, Swing weight. if they swing the club and missed in the same spot, I would assume the SIM max by tech would likely retain more ball speed than the 07 burner. The next question would be affects of this miss due to CoG and design. Does the miss add or take off spin, how about launch how about MOI or resistance to twist.

 

Anyways..... If you have a 1.49 smash factor average and NO issues missing the middle of the face of a driver. The only thing you can focus on is optimizing your launch window for the most efficient amount of Launch angle and spin.

 

If you struggle with finding the face, then its game on, trying to find a club that gives you the MOST amount of ball speed on the least optimal strike. The next thing is then matching the head design to your swing profile if you struggle with too much spin, sometimes a lower spin helps. Need more launch than a 10.5 or 11* head over a 9 or 8.5* head. Lastly would just be head design by bias of weight, Draw or fade, not a total believer in this, but hey if it helps a little why not....

 

 

So if you hit 1.5 smash all day.... probably not going to see any gains. But if you vary from 1.40 to 1.48 all over the face, some faces retain better balls speeds than others. Thats the enhancement of tech

Cobra SZ - Rogue 60s
TM 15* M2v1 - RIP Phenom 60S
TM 18* M2v1 - Rogue 60S
Sub70- 649mbs-PW-6 ,639 CBs-5-4   PX 6.0 Rifles
Vokey SM7 - 50*/8*, 56*/10* & 60*/8* S200
Scotty Newport 2 - 33"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is sort of the point that a lot of us are trying to make to the OP. You use the word "if" for whether or not a player was fitted for launch and spin, which the OP has never said was the case with his original driver. So we have NO idea if the driver he was using was an optimal fit for him or not, only that he got more or less the same results with the same setup. Which surprises nobody...

Your experience with the G30 and the G410 aren't surprising either, since you were fitted to the G30, which is still as good as anything on the market. The guy I worked with for years, who is one of Ping's best fitters in the southeast, told me not to bother with a fitting for the G when it came out; my recollection is that he said it was something like 17% more forgiving, but no longer than the G30. BUT when the G400 came out in a smaller head size, and knowing that I'm an old guy trying to stay competitive and fighting for every yard I can get, he said to come in and give it a try. I did, and we got 3 mph of swing speed improvement and 10 yards of carry.

Interestingly, at least to me, when I did my fitting for the G30 back in 2014, we set it on the big +, and I used it that way for four years. But when I did the G400 fitting, it had to be in the neutral position; either of the plus settings just hooked like crazy. In other words, those two heads are VERY different in ways OTHER than distance. I haven't hit the G410, but I'm sort of assuming that the slider also has an impact in terms of being able to tweak ball flight.

Marketing in TV and print ads focuses on distance, no doubt about it, and most of that IS hype, and no doubt about that, either. But any golfer, especially one with a lower swing speed, who ignores the possibility of picking up yardage and/or better dispersion thru the work of a good fitter is missing a bet. And that ain't hype.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m with Tangojay. The new drivers are not any longer. They haven’t been in years. Yards get picked up from a proper fitting by obtaining ideal launch and spin numbers.

RS has done this with Ping and Titleist drivers too and it’s pretty much what I’ve experienced

 

 

  • Like 1

Ping G430 10k 9 Tour Black 2.0 Stiff

Titleist TSI2 16.5 Tensei White Stiff

Titleist 818 21 KBS PROTO Stiff
Ping G710 4-PW

Ping S159 50 54 58

Ping Senita 38 Putter

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I completely agree. What got added to the mix was all the benefits of a proper fitting when the OP's question was more about actual raw tech in the heads themselves (I assumed possibly incorrectly that his previous driver was fit properly). I don't think anyone is saying that a golfer will not benefit from being fit. But assuming all parameters are correct for the player, raw distance gains from a current head to one from even 10 years ago will be minimal at best when both are hit on the sweet spot. A golfer properly fit for a G30 will hit it farther than an improperly fit G410. I don't think anyone will argue against that.

Maltby KE4 TC Max MPF Pro Stiff
Callaway Rogue 3W Synergy 60

Maltby KE4 Tour TC 19*, 22* Matrix  HX3 White Tie
Taylormade Burner TP Japan Issue 5-PW DG120

Callaway MD4 Raw 52*, 58* DG115
Maltby PTM-5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • 2024 Valspar Championship WITB Photos (Thanks to bvmagic)- Discussion & Links to Photos
      This weeks WITB Pics are from member bvmagic (Brian). Brian's first event for WRX was in 2008 at Bayhill while in college. Thanks so much bv.
       
      Please put your comments or question on this thread. Links to all the threads are below...
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 31 replies
    • 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #3
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Matt (LFG) Every - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Sahith Theegala - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Cameron putters (and new "LD" grip) - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Bettinardi MB & CB irons - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Bettinardi API putter cover - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Swag API covers - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Golf Pride Reverse Taper grips - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 15 replies
    • 2024 Cognizant Classic - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #1
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #2
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #3
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #4
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Brandt Snedeker - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Max Greyserman - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Eric Cole - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Carl Yuan - WITb - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Russell Henley - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Justin Sun - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alex Noren - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Shane Lowry - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Taylor Montgomery - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jake Knapp (KnappTime_ltd) - WITB - - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Super Stoke Pistol Lock 1.0 & 2.0 grips - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      LA Golf new insert putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Garsen Quad Tour 15 grip - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Swag covers - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jacob Bridgeman's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Bud Cauley's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Ryo Hisatsune's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Chris Kirk - new black Callaway Apex CB irons and a few Odyssey putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alejandro Tosti's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 2 replies
    • 2024 Genesis Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #3
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #4
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Rory McIlroy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Sepp Straka - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Patrick Rodgers - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Brendon Todd - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Denny McCarthy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Corey Conners - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Chase Johnson - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tommy Fleetwood - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Matt Fitzpatrick - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Si Woo Kim - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Viktor Hovland - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Wyndham Clark - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Cam Davis - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Nick Taylor - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Ben Baller WITB update (New putter, driver, hybrid and shafts) – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Vortex Golf rangefinder - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Fujikura Ventus shaft - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods & TaylorMade "Sun Day Red" apparel launch event, product photos – 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods Sun Day Red golf shoes - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Aretera shafts - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Toulon putters - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods' new white "Sun Day Red" golf shoe prototypes – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      • 22 replies
    • 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put and questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open - Monday #1
      2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open - Monday #2
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Ben Taylor - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Garrick Higgo - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Billy Horschel - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Justin Lower - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Lanto Griffin - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Bud Cauley - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Corbin Burnes (2021 NL Cy Young) - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Greyson Sigg - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Charley Hoffman - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Nico Echavarria - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Victor Perez - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Sami Valimaki - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Ryo Hisatsune - WITB - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      Jake Knapp's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      New Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Tyler Duncan's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Greyson Sigg's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Sunjae Im's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Ping's Waste Management putter covers - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Vincent Whaley's custom Cameron - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Odyssey Waste Management putter covers - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Super Stroke custom grips - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Cameron putters - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Zac Blair's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
      Bettinardi Waste Management putter covers - 2024 Waste Management Phoenix Open
       
       
       
       
       
       

       
      • 12 replies

×
×
  • Create New...