4 Year old driver vs New Driver Test



  • Exactice808Exactice808 Just want to hit ball far and go find it... Members  4841WRX Points: 430Handicap: 7-27Posts: 4,841 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #32

    AHHH You now reach the real conundrum. What is term long..... Problem is people measure their length on their LONGEST drive, or WORSE longest assumed drive....

    Here is my example, I have a 102mph swing speed AVERAGE. The optimal ball speed I can get is 1.5 smash X 102 = 153mph ball speeds... That is MAX.

    Now apply the best launch window I can and that would 267 carry with whatever roll.

    BUT have I hit 300 yard drives absolutely, do I do it with any consistency? HECK no. But You now some people have it in their head...that they can hit 300y. FACT remaining, I Generate at max 153mph ballspeeds.

    Apply reality. I DO NOT hit 1.5 smash with any consistency. I am closer to 1.45 meaning 147.9 mph ball speeds likely average AT BEST. Add in the optimal launch window (IF I get it even optimal ) we are looking at 246 carry. AGAIN if I have a launch angle and spin rate that provides it.

    Now the Painful reality, after 80 rounds of collected data and all my driving stats, I have an ACTUAL driver average of 239y, this takes in ALL my drives 300+ and 200+ averages whatever they actually were..... Yet I have a 102mph driver swing speed, that should be getting 267 carry that is a 28 yard difference of optimal and reality. So what is LONGER to me....... My longest driver or my longer averages.....

    I think MANY people fall in this category.... But also many people would NOT even consider this reality..... they think I hit it 280-290 thats my average.

    Does my swing suck? YES, am I taking advantage of the club or better served to go get my smash factor figured out, how to deliver the head better to the ball.... Yups....The newer heads do have spin benefits, do have better retention of ball speeds... But its artificial to get you closer to your optimal. But That just means you are not hitting out of the center, and likely need work there.

    Titleist 915D3 
    TM M2v1 - 
    TM 18* M2 
    TM TP MC 4 & 5 PX 6.0 Rifles
    Cobra AMP Cell Pro 6-PW PX 6.0 Rifles
    Titleist SM5 Vokey50*/8*, 54*/10* & 58*/8* X100's
    Scotty Newport 2 33"
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

  • forrester_fireforrester_fire Members  210WRX Points: 118Handicap: 11Posts: 210 Fairways
    Joined:  #33
  • mosesgolfmosesgolf Members  7051WRX Points: 323Posts: 7,051 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  edited Feb 11, 2020 9:36pm #34


    But Rick Shiels lanch monitor numbers are averages. They're not all nutted drives. The improvements in forgiveness are marginal at best.

    Ping G410 Plus 9* Tensei Orange 60 X
    Ping G410 16.5 Tensei Orange 70 X
    Ping G410 19 Tensei X
    Ping G410 22 Tour 85 Stiff
    Ping i200 5-AW KBS Tour 120 Stiff
    Ping Glide Forged 56
    Ping Glide Forged 60
    Ping UG-LE Putter
  • dwbostondwboston Lefty Boomers  2509WRX Points: 292Handicap: 6.5Posts: 2,509 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  edited Feb 11, 2020 9:47pm #35

    MrShortGame on YouTube cut open a Titleist TS3 driver with a dremel to expose the "tech" inside (and compare to a fake TS3 that he did the same thing to). Skip to 10:40 of the video to see the inside of the cut open driver head. There's no "tech" in these drivers other than the face thickness, the weight tube, and some sound-deadening material (foam or rat glue glue it looks like) stuck to the inside surface on one side. There's no "tech" in these things at all - just a hollow space.

    Titleist 915 D2 12*, GD AD BB 6S | Titleist 915F 16.5*, GD AD DI 7S | Titleist 915 H 21*, GD AD HY 95S
    Bridgestone J15 CB, 4-PW, Recoil 110 F4 | Miura 52.06 | Miura 56.10 | Miura 60.09
    Bettinardi Inovai 6.0 Crescent Neck LH, 34"
  • 1Mordrid11Mordrid1 Members  1005WRX Points: 394Posts: 1,005 Platinum Tees
    Joined:  #36

    You are basing your judgement off of someone who makes solid contact way more often than not. And when he does miss the center it is not by crazy margins. Other people in this thread are talking about average golfers with average ball striking ability. For those golfers there is a HUGE distance difference in off center strikes compared to drivers of years ago. This is one of the reasons that Callaway's "Flash Face" drivers were the number one recommended driver last year by professional fitters. And a lot of it is because they maintain more ball speed on worse than marginal strikes than any other driver out there. Which for average golfers means more consistent distance. Which for most people = longer averages. Therefore the driver is longer, because they will be further down the hole more often. So some people would say that these drivers are very "forgiving".

    But some people also tout the Ping G400 max as forgiving because it had the highest MOI of any driver. Well that is great for improving on dispersion but that does not mean that it can match the ball speeds on off-center hits of the "flash face" drivers. So You may find more fairways, but your low or high strikes might be 20 to 30 yards shorter. This is why the term"forgiveness" is so polarizing. Depending on which of these factors is more important to the individual, might define how they perceive "forgiveness"

  • mantanmantan Members  2699WRX Points: 266Handicap: 13.5Posts: 2,699 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #37

    There are so many combinations and for a lot of us our swing evolves over the years, it's about finding that elusive good fit. But when you find it, ride it for as long as you want and know you likely aren't giving up much. I've had 3 drivers that I knew were 'the one, an NVS orange shafted R5, a Ping G15 and the G400 max. the first two were in my bag for 4+ years and I really had no reason to get rid of them.

    I reshafted my G400Max and it was a disaster. Lesson learned. I'm leaving well enough alone and just gonna enjoy the best driver I've owned for another 2-3 years. (famous last WRX words)

    WITB (as of 5/8/20)
    Cobra Speedzone Extreme 10.5 (TL)
    Cobra Speedzone 5W
    PING G25 23* Hybrid
    Srixon Z565 5-PW
    Cleveland CBX 2 50*
    Cleveland CBX 2 54*
    Cleveland CBX Full Face 58*
    Cleveland Frontline Elevado
    Bridgestone Tour B RX/RXS
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

  • ValtielValtiel Konica-Minolta Bizhub Members  3569WRX Points: 1,604Handicap: 1.7Posts: 3,569 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #38

    But they are conducted at completely different times with different shafts. Again, extremely unscientific and I imagine filtered for good shots. Plus he does not account for dispersion, which is majority of "forgiveness"

    Content like this is nice, but to draw any meaningful conclusions from it with regards to "tech" is super dubious. Of course there aren't freakin' flux capacitors and gold plated widgets in there! With the exception of the Speed Injected stuff inside the new TM heads, you likely are NOT going to see much inside, and that is completely missing the point. The Titleist T3 specifically has a WAY lower CG than any previous Titleist driver at its MOI level. That is not something you are ever going to see, but it will more easily create high launch, lower spin launch conditions which will result in longer drives for many.

    Visible tech if for marketing, the meaningful things you will see like minute differences in face thickness and both horizontal and vertical center of gravity locations are invisible and far more consequential when it comes to performance.

    Mizuno ST190 9.5* Diamana X'17 70XX || Taylormade M1 430 8.5* Tensei Pro Orange V2 70TX
    Titleist 915FD 15* Kuro Kage 80XTS || Taylormade RSI UDI 16* Fujikura Motore Speeder HB 9.8 Tour-Spec X
    Titleist 915FD 18* Kuro Kage 90XTS || Titleist 818H1 18.25* Diamana Kai'li s103x Prototype 
    Callaway X-Forged UT 20* Kuro Kage XT 100TX Hybrid
    Callaway X-Forged UT 23* Brunswick Precision Rifle FCM 7.0
    Bridgestone J40 DPC 5i-7i 27*- 35* Brunswick Precision Rifle FCM 7.0
    Bridgestone J40 CB 8i-PW 39*- 48* Brunswick Precision Rifle FCM 7.0
    Vokey Mild Raw 8620 54* Brunswick Precision Rifle FCM 7.0
    Vokey SM6 58* Oil Can Low Bounce K-Grind Brunswick Precision Rifle FCM 7.0
    Vokey Special 61* Black Oxide V-Grind Brunswick Precision Rifle FCM 7.0
    Scotty Cameron Newport Tour Red Dot

    WITB Thread
  • tangojaytangojay Members  1068WRX Points: 190Posts: 1,068 Platinum Tees
    Joined:  #39

    I bought my XR on a whim of all things,,,,, I liked the looks of it, great deal so I bought it,,, my gamer before was a Cleveland 460 Classic, LOVED IT, could not get it up with a fist full of Viagra,,,, My brother-in-law could hit it a ton,,, after one round of horrible driving,,,I tossed it to him and told him it was his,,,,, 2 weeks later,,, you might off guessed it,,, HE could not hit it worth a dang,, so I also agree with a previous poster that sometimes is Psycho !!!


  • magnus7319magnus7319 A hungry dog hunts best - Lee Trevino Members  2359WRX Points: 243Handicap: +2.2Posts: 2,359 Platinum Tees
    Joined:  #40

    2 things:

    1 - You said new driver. Epic Flash is last year. Or did you mean new to you?

    2 - Bobcat is banned? I almost miss the SLDR-C references in every equipment thread.

    M2 or M3 or M4 or ... M5 or SIM
    Some driving iron for Links courses
    Titleist or Mizzy Blades when I feel lucky otherwise some AP2s or Pings or z745s or Callys 
    A Vokey wedge or 2 or 3
    I love/hate every one of my 17 putters
  • boggymanboggyman Members  2957WRX Points: 356Posts: 2,957 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #41

    Last weeks Tour winner was playing a TM M2. It’s mostly all hype these days. Has been for a few years now I believe, how new is the greatest. Just a bunch of marketing hype. Get fit with the right combination and go play.

  • Red4282Red4282 Members  889WRX Points: 363Posts: 889 Golden Tee
    Joined:  #42

    ill throw my two cents in. Have drivers improved over the last 5-10 years. Yes... but micro improvements. Is 1 yard off a mishit worth 500$? Thats in the eye of the beholder. I think the computer designed face from callaway is soooooo laughable. So we had a computer go through alllllll these different face combinations and thicknesses... and the result is we got maybe a yard on a mishit(if that) guess the human designed clubs are pretty darn good after all. And besides where do they go from there? Dont tell me they get a smarter computer and last years AI wasnt the best... sheesh. Reality says they change the sound and paint scheme and market the **** out of it.

  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

  • groachgroach Members  300WRX Points: 132Handicap: 6.3Posts: 300 Greens
    Joined:  #43

    I think it's presumptuous and even lazy to just assume new drivers are just marketing talk and BS. As a few have pointed out there are so many variations to consider and the reality is most golfers, a good 85%, have never really done a true fitting. They grab the off the rack stuff, take 5 swings, and think they got it figured out. If you're that guy, that's fine, and sure, you probably won't see much difference year over year. But you also don't know what you could be missing with other shaft and head combinations either. And to just toss that aside as marketing material is a mistake and you're completely oversimplifying everything to fit the narrative you want to believe.

    DR: Mavrik SZ - Tour AD XC 7S
    5W: Mavrik SZ - Tour AD XC 8S
    3H: Titleist 816 H2 - Speeder 8.8X
    Irons (4-P): Mizuno MP-20 MMC - KBS $ X
    Wedges (50,54,58): Mizuno T20 Raw - KBS $ X
    Putter: Newport 2.5 Special Select
    Ball: Chrome Soft Truvis
    Glove: Titleist Players
    Shoes: Nike Air Max 1
  • Red4282Red4282 Members  889WRX Points: 363Posts: 889 Golden Tee
    Joined:  #44

    while i agree about the fitting stuff, it has zero to do with the marketing and claims if technological improvements they claim. Two separate issues.

  • sphna12dsphna12d Members  549WRX Points: 136Posts: 549 Golden Tee
    Joined:  #45

    The question wasn’t raised about the tech advances that have been made. The question that was raised was if 3-4 years of advancements could be tangibly seen from hitting a head from last season and a head from 4 seasons ago using the same shaft and if the improvement is tangible enough to be worth spending an extra $500 or so on the newest heads. Now that question can’t be definitely answered for everyone because one person’s results won’t equal anyone else’s. Ultimately, we all get to decide what we want to put in the bag and how much or little we spend to do that. Yes all of us might see some tangible improvement from testing every new head and dozens of different shafts in the attempt to maximize our launch monitor numbers. Maybe that translates to improved distance and control on the course. Just remember not all of us see the benefits of squeezing every last yard from the driver every season if our existing driver is getting representative distance and control and sharpening other parts of our game will likely benefit our scores more than the extra 3 to 5 yards off the tee we might see.

  • KonstaKonsta Members  17WRX Points: 17Handicap: 8.6Posts: 17 Bunkers
    Joined:  #46

    What measuring device did you use for your swing speed? Many of the swing speed radards tend to overestimate club head speed by 5+ mph. Trackman shows to me consistently over 1.5 smash factor (1.5-1.53) with Pro V1 balls. If I mishit real bad the SF drops to 1.46. I trust the trackman as the industry standard for club head speed. GC4 shows around 4-5 mph more club head speed at my speeds. The SF on GC4 is barely 1.45 on a good strike

    Distance is in meters

  • RamminMoparRamminMopar IllinoisMembers  142WRX Points: 36Handicap: 25Posts: 142 Fairways
    Joined:  #47


  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

  • Sean2Sean2 Members  32713WRX Points: 3,009Posts: 32,713 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #48

    @Exactice808 "Problem is people measure their length on their LONGEST drive, or WORSE longest assumed drive...."

    I see this a lot with irons, which is why many an amateur comes up short. They take their average iron distance based on that one iron shot they hit absolutely flush, and the odds of doing it again are rather slim, so on approaches many tend to take too little club.


    Treat yourself as if you were someone you are responsible for helping. Jordan Peterson

    Too much sanity may be madness and the maddest thing of all is to see life as it is, and not as it should be. Cervantes

    In golf, the human mind has much higher capabilities to screw things up than the physics has to make things better. Unknown


  • j.a.j.a. Members  1750WRX Points: 194Posts: 1,750 Platinum Tees
    Joined:  #49

    The XR16 is a great driver that I tested when it was released but I didn't buy it at that moment, hence I continued until last year with a Cleveland Classic 588 when I tested a Ping G400 SFT and a Rogue Draw. In my case there was a lot of differences. With the new drivers I can hit around 20m more easily and straight finding more fairways and getting much better scores.

  • buckeyeflbuckeyefl Members  6106WRX Points: 1,101Posts: 6,106 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #50

    RS is a better player who hits it pretty close to the same spot every time. One if the major gains in new drivers is the retention of energy across the face.

    If you hit it on the screws every time then you won't notice much difference but proper fitting can make a significant difference which can be seen on any number of YouTube videos. TXG is something that everyone should watch to understand the crazy number if variables. It's not simply the shaft.

  • bluedotbluedot Members  3863WRX Points: 534Handicap: 7.5Posts: 3,863 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #51

    This doesn't speak to the OP's ideas, and probably confirms what a lot of posts have said throughout the thread.

    I'll make three guarantees about this:

    1. He was carefully fitted to the TM M2, and knows to a certainty that he's getting optimal performance.
    2. He's tested other stuff in the meantime to see if he can get better results, and likely at the urging of TM.
    3. When he tests a better combo, he make the switch in a heartbeat.
  • boggymanboggyman Members  2957WRX Points: 356Posts: 2,957 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  edited Feb 18, 2020 2:55am #52

    Why wouldn’t it speak to the OP’s ideas? How do you make these guarantees? I’m sure he was optimal fitted and squeezing all he can get outta the M2. I’m sure TM would love to have him in a SIM as well. Beings he’s not, should say something, even though he’s been optimal fitted. So, if all the claims being made these days by manufacturers, it should be even easier for a tour pro, with all they have at their disposal, to get optimal performance from just about anything.

  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

  • Old Fashioned CowboyOld Fashioned Cowboy You and Me and the Devil Makes Three... Members  75WRX Points: 58Handicap: 9Posts: 75 Fairways
    Joined:  #53

    Normally I agree with this statement. I played the TM Jetspeed (super underrated club), 2016 M1 and 2017 M2. I broke my M1 and Taylormade replaced it with an M3, but man did I hate that driver. So, the Jetspeed through the M2/M3 I saw no real performance boost in all my testing. In fact, I thought I was pretty optimally fit in my M2, but yesterday I got on the simulator and hit the SIM Max next to my M2 and the numbers don't lie. I thought it was a joke. Mis-hits were flying super far and center hits were carrying 15 yards further. I'm not saying this is typical with all new drivers (in fact it hasn't been), but I guess you never know until you go out and try a new combo. I also love trying new clubs on the monitor, but so far in my 20 years of playing golf have never bought a new driver before yesterday. It's just one of the matches that worked and I'll take it.

    TM SIM Max 9* Speeder Pro 74 TS
    TM M3 3HL set to 19* Speeder Pro 84 TS
    TM GAPR Mid 21* Fujikura Fuel 85HY
     Mizuno MP-32 4-PW DG S300
    Cleveland RTX-3 Tour Raw Mid-Bounce 52, 56, 60
    EVNROLL ER2 34" - Lie: 4* Flat - Loft: 3*

    Bruises will heal, stink is good and apathy is death.
  • mukstermukster A lot can happen in a year. North of the 49thMembers  3727WRX Points: 484Posts: 3,727 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #54

    My driver. I removed one of the weights today to make the swingweight a bit lighter. :) It’s ugly, but it’s mine!

    I added the weights after I shortened the shaft. Sorry for the flipped image, it’s thanks to our wonderful new editor.

    I will be taking my behemoth along for a proper driver fitting and I am excited to see what comparisons I will see. I will post those results once done.

    For CAD $600 or thereabouts, a new one had better be significantly better in every way.

    Callaway XR16 driver, 9 degrees, Diamana S+ shaft
    Callaway Epic 3 Wood , Fubuki Z65 shaft
    Mizuno ST180 5 wood,  Tensei CK Blue shaft
    Cobra F8 22* hybrid
    Srixon Z765 5-PW irons
    , KBS Tour V shafts
    Srixon A wedge 51° bent to 50°
    Hogan Equalizer 54* wedge
    Mizuno S18 58* wedge
    Nike Method Core Drone 2.0 putter
  • orangeologyorangeology Category II Hoarder NY NJMembers  764WRX Points: 161Handicap: 14Posts: 764 Golden Tee
    Joined:  edited Feb 18, 2020 6:58am #55

    (as in my signature) i have an XR16 Pro & a Rogue, both in TC heads + same shaft Fujikura SIX. think they are about 4± yrs apart co-incidentally.

    XR16 is superior in terms of accuracy + workability. i can hit like a 3W (comparing to a driver in general).

    Rogue is superior in the distance dept. same swing, same condition, it'd go at least 10 yd further. when i have a 'good' hit w XR16 it's about 240. i'm 5'08", 130lbs. a good hit with Rogue, it's at least 255 - 260.

    biggest difference is feel/sound from that one is metal while the other is composite head. an obvious one.

    hard to find what not to like on XR16.

    biggest not-in-favor for Rogue is 1. chunkier/ballony head being 460cc (XR16's 440c, noticeably smaller with pear shape). 2. it's delicate aka not much forgiving. 250 yd to the next fairway right or left often...

    if i had a competition or beer game tomorrow, i'd bag XR16. for a long drive comp, definitely Rogue.

    my point being is:

    1. '4 yrs apart' seems non-relevant to "what's better". too much variables, eveyone would have different results
    2. no matter what XR16 is one of the best drivers. i've experimented about 10 different heads to settle down on it.

    Callaway XR16 Pro TC 9º + Fujikura Six Tour Spec X

    Callaway Rogue TC 14.7º + Fujikura Pro Tour Spec TI 6X
    Adams Super LS Speedline TI 14º + Aldila RIP'd NV 7 TX
    Royal Collection 505V BBD Hybrid #2 18º + NS PRO 950W X

    TM TP UDI #2 18º + DG TI X100
    set1: Nike VFP 4i + HZRDUS HC Black 95 6.5, 5i + DG TI X100, VP Forged Blades 6–P + DG TI X100
    set2: Nike VR Pro II Blades + DG TI X100 3-P

    Scratch 8620 47º 50º 56º DG S300 / Scratch STI 60º + DG TI S400

    Scotty CLN, Edel The Brick

  • Singapore JoeSingapore Joe Major? Winner? Members  1781WRX Points: 194Posts: 1,781 Platinum Tees
    Joined:  #56

    With the release cycles of major equipment manufacturers it's pretty obvious there can't be major differences between models. The changes are mostly cosmetic and very marginal performance improvements. Over a time these marginal improvements accumulate into major improvements. I just replaced a TM R11S with Cobra Speedzone. We are talking of twenty meter distance gain on launch monitor, more on course, with very tight dispersion.

    Likely a non-negligible portion of that improvement comes from the shaft being a better fit for me, but on both of my typical misses the performance difference to a good shot was very small. I doubt there would be a noticable difference to a year or two year old model that can't be attributed to the fit of the club but most people in the real world don't get new clubs every year. If you get a new driver every ten years and don't always hit the sweet spot you will see substantial improvement.

    I also prefer the feel but that's too vague and not easily quantifiable so it's not really an argument.

    Cobra Speedzone 10.5 Aldila Rogue Silver
    Cobra Speedzone 18.5 Aldila Rogue Silver
    Callaway Apex UT 18, Recoil 95
    Callaway Apex Pro 3i, Recoil 95
    Callaway Apex Pro 4-9,P Recoil 110
    Callaway MD4 54, 58
    Ping Sigma G Kinloch C
  • boggymanboggyman Members  2957WRX Points: 356Posts: 2,957 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #57

    Did you see the same distance gain on the course as you say in the simulator??

  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

  • Hershey27Hershey27 Members  83WRX Points: 39Posts: 83 Fairways
    Joined:  #58

    I have made upgrades to other clubs in my bag, but I still game my trusty old 910D3. Could I gain a few more yards, maybe but nothing replaces the confidence I have on the tee box.

  • Singapore JoeSingapore Joe Major? Winner? Members  1781WRX Points: 194Posts: 1,781 Platinum Tees
    Joined:  #59

    In fact, I saw bigger gain on course. Hard to be precise but clearly more than twenty meters.

    Cobra Speedzone 10.5 Aldila Rogue Silver
    Cobra Speedzone 18.5 Aldila Rogue Silver
    Callaway Apex UT 18, Recoil 95
    Callaway Apex Pro 3i, Recoil 95
    Callaway Apex Pro 4-9,P Recoil 110
    Callaway MD4 54, 58
    Ping Sigma G Kinloch C
  • 95124hacker95124hacker Members  1378WRX Points: 195Posts: 1,378 Platinum Tees
    Joined:  #60

    The right shaft & hosel/weight settings are key for any head. Took out my M2 & played around with 2 drivers yesterday for a casual round (XR16 SZ & 915D2) & both produced better flight & distance. Older tech can still work.

    TS3 9.5*, Tensei AV Blue SFW 55R, Draw setting
    TS2 15*, Tensei AV Blue 65R, Draw setting
    PXG 0317 17*, MMT 80S, Draw setting
    PXG 0317X Gen2 19*, MMT 80S, Draw setting
    PXG 0311 Gen1 4-iron, Steelfiber 95S
    Fourteen TC770 Forged, 5-PW, Roddio Pentacross I-8, SR
    RTX4 Tour Raw 52/10 Mid Grind, DG Tour S400
    RTX3 Tour Raw 58/9 Mid Grind, DG Wedge
    Odyssey WHP CSM 400g
    Bridgestone Tour B RX / XS
  • GolfWRXGolfWRX Warning Points: 0  11 Members Posts: 11 #ad
    Joined:  ...

  • Exactice808Exactice808 Just want to hit ball far and go find it... Members  4841WRX Points: 430Handicap: 7-27Posts: 4,841 Titanium Tees
    Joined:  #61

    Yes the over estimation is what is potentially giving the odd smash factors. Yes TM does and can give over the 1.5 smash, but generically speaking 1.5 is the basis of measurement. Going back to my original point, CT units are truly the ONLY actual true measurement but not many people have a CT machine.

    Anyways smash is a calculation of ball speed and club speed so if a measurement is off it can read skewed numbers but the point is you can get a base number of potential through estimation. If you have a swing speed of 100 the potential ball speed is 150mph. if you have a swing speed of 110 you have a potential of 165mph. we are likely not exceeding this. In other words I dont know of any human able to have a swing speed of 100mph yet produce a ball speed of 160 (1.6smash) with a confirming club 239ct units +/- 18ct units, and a calibrated launch monitor.

    The conforming club cannot exceed a maximum of 257 ct units period if it exceeds this then its non confirming and your round is not a stipulated round.

    Titleist 915D3 
    TM M2v1 - 
    TM 18* M2 
    TM TP MC 4 & 5 PX 6.0 Rifles
    Cobra AMP Cell Pro 6-PW PX 6.0 Rifles
    Titleist SM5 Vokey50*/8*, 54*/10* & 58*/8* X100's
    Scotty Newport 2 33"

Leave a Comment

Rich Text Editor. To edit a paragraph's style, hit tab to get to the paragraph menu. From there you will be able to pick one style. Nothing defaults to paragraph. An inline formatting menu will show up when you select text. Hit tab to get into that menu. Some elements, such as rich link embeds, images, loading indicators, and error messages may get inserted into the editor. You may navigate to these using the arrow keys inside of the editor and delete them with the delete or backspace key.