Forgive me if this question has already been asked in addressed in previous forums, but I cant seem to find it.
I recently got fit for the Ping Blueprint at Modern Golf (to my surprise) and WOW the look, feel and performance was unreal. That said, I only hit and compared the 6 iron (with multiple shafts) against most of the current blades (620MB, ApexMB) , cavity backs (620CB, ZX7, ApexCB) and players improvement irons (T100, Apex Pro) on the market but the Ping i59 wasn't in the fitting drawer yet. I have held the i59 7 iron and it looks very similar at address than the Blueprint (minus the added groves) however I haven't seen or read many direct comparisons regarding the performance (launch, spin, feel, turf interaction and forgiveness) between the two.
I have no issue sticking with the Blueprint 6-PW but I have heard and would agree that the 4-5 irons can look a little "knify" which had me wondering if the i59 would / should match the performance profile of the Blueprints in the longer irons. Yes, I know that they would be technically more forgiving and less "knify" looking, I am more interested in the performance aspect in regards to making a combo set.
On another thought, would or could I assume that the i59 could perform very similar than the Blueprint through the bag (4-PW)?
Curious to know your experience between the two...WRX lets hear it!