Jump to content

thejazzmarauder

Advanced Members
  • Posts

    157
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by thejazzmarauder

  1. On 9/2/2021 at 6:20 PM, golfortennis said:

     

    I have no idea, but do RBs not matter, or do RBs no longer matter because the rules have changed to favor passing much more than in the past?  

     

    The analytics people may be taking one on the chin in baseball, as they were the ones who pushed for the minor leagues to be shrunk, and it's causing some pretty big player development problems.  I typically support the analytics approach, but there are times it's overdone/done wrong.  (Notwithstanding the fact they seem to have made baseball completely unwatchable).   This may be one of them.

     

    Getting back on topic, it is funny to still hear people talk as though being closer to the hole is not better.  If you are not in real trouble, how does it not improve your chances when that is what happens at the pro level?  

    The nerds didn't make baseball unwatchable, they simply discovered how to maximize run creation. The fact that three-true outcome-guys are more valuable than slap hitters is a reality that every organization has had to adapt to. If you think that has ruined the game (and I certainly think it's less interesting to watch now), blame those who can change the rules but don't. 

     

    As for RBs, they haven't mattered for a long time, if they ever did. In the words of Ben Baldwin's 'nerd-to-human translator', saying that running backs don't matter is really saying that: "the results of run plays are primarily determined by run blocking and defenders in the box, not who is carrying the ball. Running backs are interchangeable, and investing a lot of resources (in the draft or free agency) doesn't make sense."

    • Like 3
  2. I highly recommend checking out Mike Adams / Terry Rowles. Mike is a former PGA Teacher of the Year. They do physical assessments of all of their students to identify each person's optimal swing. One of those tests is checking to see the way that your right arm naturally wants to fold. The results of that tell you how weak/strong your grip should be (and how your right arm should work in backswing). If you have a mismatch, it's very difficult to hit the golf ball solidly and consistently. 

     

    Among the top-100 players in the world, you see guys with weak grips who end up with more of a flying right elbow (with paths that go a bit left as a result) and guys with strong grips, a tucked elbow, and a ton of lag (with paths that go right). Both of these grips/swings, and everything in between, can obviously produce world class golfers. The key is ensuring that your biomechanics match your swing. 

    • Like 1
  3. On 7/21/2021 at 6:37 PM, HIGGINS30 said:

    I looked into Tualatin Country club a year ago prior to joining Riverside. They had a renovation special for $2500 initiation fees. When I went get more info the special was over as the club was almost at capacity. Cost was back up to $9,000 initiation  as of last summer with dues right around $600. 

    Was it $9,000 for under-40? Interested in learning more about Tualatin since I'm buying a house nearby. Any members here? 

  4. IMO, it doesn't get more arbitrary or dumb than the OB rules, even after the updates. All they do is disproportionately punish worse players and slow down the game. A lateral hazard is already a serious penalty for better players, which is why guys on tour are so conservative when their target is near a hazard. When you hit it in a lateral, you're already scrambling for bogey; that's a big deal if you're trying to break par.  

    Many OB lines are already deep in the woods. Treating them as a lateral hazard (allowing a player to drop from within two club lengths of point-of-entry) would often require punching out with your 3rd, making double bogey likely anyway. We should've left white stakes in the 20th century. 

  5. 2 minutes ago, Rosco1216 said:

    Significant muscle mass won’t make a difference because 15+ Lbs of lean muscle mass means nothing if absolute strength and neuromuscular efficiency isn’t trained or optimized.  Training compound and dynamic lifts increase neuromuscular efficiency and posterior chain power output.   You can get significantly stronger in compound and dynamic lifts without putting on significant muscle mass. You get stronger by teaching the body to work together over multiple joints with greater efficiency. 

    Can't imagine adding 20 pounds of muscle without a focus on squats, deadlifts, cleans, and shoulder press. If your argument is that you don't necessarily need to get heavier to get stronger, and that it's the latter that would increase your swing speed, I'd buy that (given that your body fat is going down in the process). 

  6. On 8/13/2021 at 5:14 PM, xmanhockey7 said:

    When NLU says there are spots it better to be 180y in the fairway with a good angle than 100 in the fairway with a bad angle….I mean it’s just absurd. There was a huge debate over that and it shouldn’t have even been a debate. 100y will win every time. 

    Exactly. I really like the analogy to how analytics have informed us of controversial realities in other sports. For example, there are still a TON of people (including NFL GMs) who will argue that running backs matter. But we know for sure that they don't. And yet RBs are still being drafted in the first round and getting fat contracts; these things are dying, but it's a slower death than it should be given the quantity and certainty of the data. 

  7. Do yourself a huge favor and look into what Mike Adams (former PGA Teacher of the Year) and Terry Rowles teach. Your body wants to swing the club in a particular way based on your biomechanics, and if you try to swing differently than that, you'll struggle.

     

    20 years from now, most golf instructors will be doing a physical assessment at the beginning of their first lesson with a new student. These guys are ahead of their time. 

  8. If you add significant muscle mass it might make a difference, but it's very difficult to add 15+ pounds of good weight in your late 30s without help. As you said, you can't just magically "add more lag" without ruining your ball striking. Sorry.

     

    Anecdotally, over the past decade I've been between a skinny 195 and a strong 220, and am currently a skinny fat 210, and my carry distances never changed. 

    • Like 1
  9. 19 minutes ago, GolfTurkey said:

    Buy a Trackman and tell everyone to swing 5 up with driver and zero out face and path, nobody will know you're new.

    Also make sure you have them try to get their hips way open at impact. Shame them for early extending as often as possible. 

    • Haha 1
  10. It helps a ton to have a stroke that can repeatably start the ball on the intended line. At that point you can just make a decision and live with it. Without that you're just guessing and hoping to get lucky. For a long time, I couldn't start the ball on my intended line consistently and, as a result, absolutely hated putting. Now that I can, it's stress free and fun. 

    • Like 1
  11. I've been stuck in the upper 70s for a decade (b/w 76 and 80 almost without exception). I recently made two changes (flatter backswing + claw grip putting) and saw immediate improvement, which translated to the course. I've had a chance to break par in four straight rounds (it still feels surreal). 

     

    I imagine there are others out there with similar stories; what'd you change?

    • Like 1
  12. 2 hours ago, golfarb1 said:

    1.Be obsessive with your grip. Your grip is your only contact with the club, so any mistakes with the grip will cause compensations later in the swing.One important factor which is rarely discussed is the necessity to grip the club so that your two hands work together. 

     

    I agree that grip is super important but run away from anyone who says there's one perfect grip. Your grip needs to fit your swing, which should fit your body. And as far as your two hands working together, this doesn't necessarily mean comfort. Some all-time greats (Tiger, Rory, Stenson, Spieth) have mismatched grips (i.e. one strong hand and one weak hand). 

  13. I'm at a point where I don't trust any instructor who doesn't perform some kind of physical assessment as part of the first lesson. There are a bunch of different swings on the tour because there are a bunch of different body types. Rory Mcilroy's right hip moves forward in the downswing (*GASP*); should he try to eliminate that? C'mon. 

     

    Even if two people have identical proportions, one may naturally move differently than the other (e.g. how does your right elbow want to fold?). I think a lot of smart, well-meaning instructors teach relative to optimal swings/positions, but there are a bunch of people who can't/shouldn't try to replicate that if their goal is optimizing their own personal swing. Some people get lucky and match with an instructor who teaches a method that fits their biomechanics; stack-and-tilt legitimately worked for some people, while for others, it was a disaster. 

     

    Golf is hard, and if you aren't moving in a way that your body wants to move, good luck. 

  14. 1 minute ago, aenemated said:

     

    There're freakin' huge signs at every grocery store with a pharmacy near me all VACCINES HERE! JUST COME ON OVER! 

     

    I've looked past most of BD's silliness but this ... I mean, come on dude, WTactualF? 

     

    For a guy who claims to make decisions based on science, this isn't a good look and could actually hurt his brand, imo. 

    • Like 2
  15. Where'd you play? I've played all the Portland metro courses multiple times, and for me:

     

    1a) Langdon Farms: just a gorgeous course and layout that's always in great shape. A lot of the holes are framed by hills/mounds full of golden fescue on one or both sides.

     

    1b) The Reserve (South Course): classic American golf course that was even better before they took out dozens of bunkers due to member complaints (it's semi-private, alternating north/south bi-weekly). Has hosted senior PGA majors for a reason. IMO, it plays easier than its rating (74.6 from the tips) if you're long off the tee, so it's a good way to bring handicap down. 

     

    3) Pumpkin Ridge (Ghost Creek): this is a really nice, classic course that benefits from its association with the more famous private side (Witch Hollow, where Tiger won a US Am). Lots of old growth that makes the course feel like it belongs there and has always existed. 

     

    As others mentioned, there are lots of other fun courses in the area, too:

     

    RedTail: I'm biased because I grew up on this course, but I love it, even back when the greens were awful (they're much better now). Great layout; would be on all of the top-10 lists if it were private. Given its location, it gets a ton of play and rounds are slow as a result. This is a challenging course, very demanding off the tee. #7 might be the most difficult par-5 in the NW. 

     

    Chehalem Glenn: Lovely and unique monster. Not a good course for beginners; I've seen someone lose > a dozen balls. I recommend a cart, especially if it's hot out, as it's a long and hilly. Fun course that'll test your game in all areas. 

     

    Stone Creek: the front and back sides feel like two different courses. Plenty of variety. Nice golden fescue depending on the time of year. I have friends who'd put this in their top-3, it just never quite did it for me and I'm not sure why. Tournament-quality course, for sure. 

     

    The Reserve (North Course): more of a links-style course that never seems to be in as pristine condition as the south side. High quality, nonetheless. 

     

    Meriwether National: not as nice as it sounds, but really fun to play nonetheless. Again, the front/back are disjointed and feel like two separate courses. Great place to have too many beers and hit some bombs. Nice open feel without being a pasture. Greens are pure so you can go low if you get the putter going. 

     

    Heron Lakes (Great Blue Course): best public course in north Portland. Feels big and open, but there's plenty of trouble if you're loose off the tee. Usually packed. 

     

    Quail Valley: haven't played this in a long time but remember it being a nice, tournament-quality track. Holed out from 195 on 18 the last time I played it. 

     

     

    • Like 1
  16. On 8/2/2021 at 12:34 PM, getitdaily said:

    Biggest key...find the fall line of the break of the green or section of green. From there it gets more simple using a + method. 

     

    Starting upper left on the +, upper left is 1, upper right is 2, lower left is 3, lower right is 4. The hole is the center of the +.

     

    Top of the + is top of the slope (high side), bottom of the + is the low side.

     

    A putt from quad 1 to the hole will always break right. The closer you get to quad 3, the more break. The closer you get to quad 2, the less break. A putt from quad 3 will always break right. The closer to quad 1, the more the break. 

     

    All you have to do is find the fall line (the line where the putt is dead straight) and your ball's position in the + related to that line. 

     

    It's how I do it....

     

    This is similar to the method that Geoff Mangum teaches. I've found it really helps to orient yourself that way and section off the green. 

  17. 50 minutes ago, sadclevelandsports said:

     

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzBpGbzvxac

     

    If it helps, this was the oldest video of my swing that I could find from around 1 year ago, and if I could find any older, it would look much worse than that. I've put a lot of work into it since then. My dad is not a golfer, he golfs very occasionally with his friends, enough to own his own set of clubs. He is not a ceo nor is my mother a dietician. If we are splitting hairs, I had been to Top Golf and the nearby range prior to starting, but never true golf. I will admit that I belonged to the cohort of people who looked down on golf prior to getting into it, even arguing that it wasn't a real sport, just a hobby for older folk. 

     

    Welp..definitely thinking posting was a mistake. Was honestly chuffed that I finally broke 90 after months of painstaking effort, was excited enough to post. Also wanted to see if I could add some value to the people who are early on in the sport like myself. No other sport has grabbed my neurosis quite like golf, and having more fun than anything that I've ever had. If the math on the 3 putts seems suspect, can't do much about that. I don't think my math was that off, but it wouldn't be the first time I've made a math mistake. However, I wasn't the one who tallied the raw score, so I can sleep easy knowing it's a real score and my first time breaking 90.

     

    This will likely be my last time posting in this thread. Again, it would have been preferable if this could have been a place for newer golfers to trade ideas; I guess it's become more of a joke, and probably my own doing. Obviously, if anyone has any advice for how to not slip back to the 90's or to even progress, I always appreciate advice.

    All good man, don’t take it personally. There have been some crazy posts over the years so the crowd is fairly skeptical of exceptional claims. If that swing you just posted was @ the beginning, then you’re clearly ahead of 99% of people who take up the game; you had a lot of good things to work with on day one.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...