Jump to content

Ping Glide 3.0 Appreciation Thread


Recommended Posts

Picked up my 3.0 Eye 2’s today. Amazing feel and versatility. Love them. Who else has the new 3.0’s, and how do you like em?5bn3w0td488o.jpeg

 

Cobra BioCell Plus w/ Matrix Red Tie
Cobra BioCell 3W w/ Aldila Tour Green ATX65
PING g20 Hy w/ Nippon Steel
PING BeCu ISI w ZZ65’s...properly patina’d 
Vokey SM’s 54 & 58
OWorks Two-Ball Fang
...all subject to “adjustment” per WRX societal norms...

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 238
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

> @GolfChannel said: > > @nilopol said: > > Does anyone feel these to be too light? Also anyone can comment with a Project x PZ in it? I play PZ6.0 i500. > > I didn't thi

The TXG guy has loved the Ping wedges for a couple years now. Basically always says it's been the best wedge for him with fittings. With the CBX's out and getting a lot of love the Glide's provide

I ordered a custom set of 3.0's on 7/22, and they were delivered on 8/14. 'Not too bad considering the "horror" stories of custom orders taking months. The set includes a 52 SS, 56 Eye2, and a 60 SS,

Posted Images

I am most surprised with how they perform on tight lies. That half groove on the bottom must be working.

Cobra BioCell Plus w/ Matrix Red Tie
Cobra BioCell 3W w/ Aldila Tour Green ATX65
PING g20 Hy w/ Nippon Steel
PING BeCu ISI w ZZ65’s...properly patina’d 
Vokey SM’s 54 & 58
OWorks Two-Ball Fang
...all subject to “adjustment” per WRX societal norms...

Link to post
Share on other sites

> @Jaygolf37 said:

> I am most surprised with how they perform on tight lies. That half groove on the bottom must be working.

 

Yeah I found the Stealths to have exceptional spin lower in the face on tight lies maybe due to that groove. The one thing I don't get about the Eye 2 version is why they didn't do what Cally and TM did with the PM and Hi-Toe and put grooves all over the face out to the toe.

Taylormade Sim 9* Ventus Velo Blue 7x 

Taylormade Sim Max 3W Aldila Rogue 110MSI 70x

Taylormade Sim Max 5W Ventus Velo Blue 7x

Taylormade P7MC 4-PW Dynamic Gold X100

Taylormade MG2 51* SB Dynamic Gold Tour Issue S400

Taylormade MG2 TW 56* + 60* Dynamic Gold Tour Issue S400

Byron Morgan DH89 34.75/70*/2*

Titleist Pro -V1x  or Bridgestone Tour BXS

Ping Hoofer

Link to post
Share on other sites

> @balls_deep said:

> > @Jaygolf37 said:

> > I am most surprised with how they perform on tight lies. That half groove on the bottom must be working.

>

> Yeah I found the Stealths to have exceptional spin lower in the face on tight lies maybe due to that groove. The one thing I don't get about the Eye 2 version is why they didn't do what Cally and TM did with the PM and Hi-Toe and put grooves all over the face out to the toe.

I am glad they didn’t. I hate that look from address and never hit shots like that.

.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

> @balls_deep said:

> > @Jaygolf37 said:

> > I am most surprised with how they perform on tight lies. That half groove on the bottom must be working.

>

> Yeah I found the Stealths to have exceptional spin lower in the face on tight lies maybe due to that groove. The one thing I don't get about the Eye 2 version is why they didn't do what Cally and TM did with the PM and Hi-Toe and put grooves all over the face out to the toe.

 

You may not agree with this, but this reviewer thinks it does accomplish anything because of where the ball impacts the face.

 

[https://youtu.be/EvWsmX9mp1Q](https://youtu.be/EvWsmX9mp1Q "https://youtu.be/EvWsmX9mp1Q")

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

> @jjfcpa said:

> > @balls_deep said:

> > > @Jaygolf37 said:

> > > I am most surprised with how they perform on tight lies. That half groove on the bottom must be working.

> >

> > Yeah I found the Stealths to have exceptional spin lower in the face on tight lies maybe due to that groove. The one thing I don't get about the Eye 2 version is why they didn't do what Cally and TM did with the PM and Hi-Toe and put grooves all over the face out to the toe.

>

> You may not agree with this, but this reviewer thinks it does accomplish anything because of where the ball impacts the face.

>

> [https://youtu.be/EvWsmX9mp1Q](https://youtu.be/EvWsmX9mp1Q "https://youtu.be/EvWsmX9mp1Q")

>

 

You know I kinda wonder if Ping didn't want to chase that design. Ping wedges are rarely found in bags that dont have Ping irons. So, if you like the Ping look, you'll be fine without the extra look....

 

I dunno.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Eye2 wedge is more about the grind and hosel configuration than anything. The high toe aspect was more to make it blend with the original Eye2 iron set, and the attempt at extreme perimeter weighting. Having the grooves put on the toe was just something Phil came up with at Callaway because of the extreme amount he slides the club under the ball especially out of rough. That video review is a joke, that guy is hitting off of artificial turf and has 1/100th the skill Phil does with a wedge.

That being said the modern high toe and Eye 2 use the toe to raise the cog and provide some forgiveness higher on the face if you slide under it a bit too much from deep rough. As the Brits say it is a bit of a Marmite club.

 

The grind is a brilliant design in the hands of the right person using a certain technique, but if your technique isn’t similar to what Phil does I doubt it will do much good. I have an original Eye2 SW I mess around with, but I always end up with a M grind or the Ping SS in the bag. If I wanted a club just for flops though this would be it.

> @jjfcpa said:

> > @balls_deep said:

> > > @Jaygolf37 said:

> > > I am most surprised with how they perform on tight lies. That half groove on the bottom must be working.

> >

> > Yeah I found the Stealths to have exceptional spin lower in the face on tight lies maybe due to that groove. The one thing I don't get about the Eye 2 version is why they didn't do what Cally and TM did with the PM and Hi-Toe and put grooves all over the face out to the toe.

>

> You may not agree with this, but this reviewer thinks it does accomplish anything because of where the ball impacts the face.

>

> [https://youtu.be/EvWsmX9mp1Q](https://youtu.be/EvWsmX9mp1Q "https://youtu.be/EvWsmX9mp1Q")

>

 

 

I pick 14 of the following:
Ping G400
Ping G410 3, 5 and 7 wood
Ping G 400 4 hybrid
Ping G 4-U
Ping Glide 2.0 Stealth 54, 58 SS
Grips NDMC +4
Odyssey Pro #1 black
Hoofer
ProV1x-mostly
ECCO Biom Hybrid 3

Link to post
Share on other sites

I want those eye2 wedges....I really do

 

But 200CAD for that wedge when I have basically a brand new PM grind Callaway which is the same thing is hard.

 

I'll see how long I can hold out

Callaway Mavrik Max 9 w/Hzrdus Smoke Black 80
Ping G410 LST 13 w/Ping Tour 75
Ping G400 Crossover 20 w/KBS Tour Prototype 85
Ping G410 4-SW w/S300
Titleist Vokey SM8 60 M grind

Deschamps Blade 375g

Link to post
Share on other sites

> @Ivyguy said:

> > @jjfcpa said:

> > > @balls_deep said:

> > > > @Jaygolf37 said:

> > > > I am most surprised with how they perform on tight lies. That half groove on the bottom must be working.

> > >

> > > Yeah I found the Stealths to have exceptional spin lower in the face on tight lies maybe due to that groove. The one thing I don't get about the Eye 2 version is why they didn't do what Cally and TM did with the PM and Hi-Toe and put grooves all over the face out to the toe.

> >

> > You may not agree with this, but this reviewer thinks it does accomplish anything because of where the ball impacts the face.

> >

> > [https://youtu.be/EvWsmX9mp1Q](https://youtu.be/EvWsmX9mp1Q "https://youtu.be/EvWsmX9mp1Q")

> >

>

> You know I kinda wonder if Ping didn't want to chase that design. Ping wedges are rarely found in bags that dont have Ping irons. So, if you like the Ping look, you'll be fine without the extra look....

>

> I dunno.

 

I watched that video the other day and didn't agree with it based on what I know about grooves, which could be wrong because I am no expert by any stretch of the imagination.

 

However, I was under the impression that often times when opening the face, you are rarely making a swing that is square to the target but cutting across the ball more. Furthermore, grooves are designed to increase spin because they channel debris away from the face and allow more of the surface area of the wedge to contact the ball. Not because "more grooves = more spin" or anything like that. So with this video, while yes, on a straight shot not in the rough using a square clubface to the target, probably doesn't make a bit of difference. But in a situation where you have rough between the ball and the clubface, and you are making a swing that is more out to in cutting across the ball and creating a great chance to make contact on the toe. I am pretty sure the grooves do make a difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just replaced a 58° Glide ES grind with 58° Glide 3.0 Eye2 grind, and found 2 differences: much more spin with the new wedge out of the sand (I'm sure the new grooves help), and the new wedge is much easier to hit flop shots with -- it lays open better. These are the easiest clubs to hit out of green side bunkers I've ever owned. All in all, the Eye2 grind seems an improvement.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here’s how versatile they are: from my round today, and on consecutive holes, I hit a couple shots to about 3 feet each. First was an airmailed tee shot on a par 3...left it long and on the bank behind with a fluffy downhill lie (Green also slopes back to front). I opened it up and hit a low spinner that check dgreat. Next hole was a “drivable” par 4...so I was 20 yards short and sitting on a very tight lie, just short of a false front (pin on the front). Same club, but not opened up. Hit a low pitch that missed the collar, but checked on the 2nd hop. That is why I love these clubs.

 

I’m not a pro, and I did hit some crappy shots with them today too, but their versatility is why I got them.

Cobra BioCell Plus w/ Matrix Red Tie
Cobra BioCell 3W w/ Aldila Tour Green ATX65
PING g20 Hy w/ Nippon Steel
PING BeCu ISI w ZZ65’s...properly patina’d 
Vokey SM’s 54 & 58
OWorks Two-Ball Fang
...all subject to “adjustment” per WRX societal norms...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I loved the Glide 2.0. I wasn't a big fan of the Eye2 model of the Glide 3. I will say the spin on them was fantastic. I'm leaning toward trading it in for a SS model instead.

WITB (as of 11/14/20)
PING G410 PLUS 9*
PING G400 5-wood
PING G410 22*
Srixon Z565 5-PW
Cleveland CBX 2 50*
Cleveland CBX 2 54*
Cleveland CBX Full Face 58*
Cleveland Frontline Elevado
Titleist ProV1x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a chance to compare my MD4 48* and 54* wedges against the Ping 3.0 46* and 50* wedge.

 

I found the 48* MD4 carried further and had more spin than the Ping 3.0 46*. The MD4 carried maybe 5-10 yards further but I couldn't explain the increased spin that the MD4 delivered. Same relative shaft on both wedges.

 

I then tested the 50* Ping 3.0 wedge against my 54* MD4 and found that the distance was just slightly longer for the Ping and as you'd expect, the MD4 provided more spin.

 

Finally, I wanted to compare the MD4 54* against a MD4 58* because I've had some trouble holding greens with the 54*. I found that the 54 was spinning in the 7000-8000 range and the 58 was in the 9000-10000 range. Surprisingly, I found that I could get the same distance with both wedges. All the MD4 wedges have the same shafts. Graphite wedge flex.

 

I think the MD4's are staying in the bag until I get some more practice time with the Ping's to see if anything changes. At about 2/3's the price of the Ping, the MD4's seem to be a great value too.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still waiting on my 54* Eye 2 grind to arrive, but I've had the 60* Eye 2 for about a week now...............it's very good around the greens. I've played Glide ES models in the past and liked them..........these are better. I recently had been using a TM High Toe, it's a nice wedge but not as versatile from bad lies as the 60* Eye 2..............and it's probably the best bunker club you'll ever hit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking forward to trying these, how are they from 30-100 range? I always loved the Eye2 around the greens, but struggled with pitch to full shots.

My Bag
Ping G410 Plus 10.5 Tensei CK Orange 60S
Callaway Epic Flash SubZero 18*(playing 17*) Hzrdus Smoke 6.0
Srixon U85 3 iron Recoil F4
Srixon Z785 4 - PW LZ 6.0 
Vokey SM6 54S & TVD 58M
Putter: Taylormade Tour Spider
Ball: Taylormade TP5X
All grips GP TV midsize +1

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m not sure why, but I can’t get into the eye 2 shape. It just looks terrible to my eye. The other thing that I’m not crazy about is the lighter weight. Personally, I like my wedges to be heavier. I really like my stealth 2.0’s but it sounds like I’ll need to custom order the 3.0’s if I stick with PING for my next set.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I t> @leftycabe said:

> I’m not sure why, but I can’t get into the eye 2 shape. It just looks terrible to my eye. The other thing that I’m not crazy about is the lighter weight. Personally, I like my wedges to be heavier. I really like my stealth 2.0’s but it sounds like I’ll need to custom order the 3.0’s if I stick with PING for my next set.

 

I always custom order. You get them exactly how you like. Also, if you send your 2.0s in to Ping, they can adjust the weight heavier for you. Otherwise there's always lead tape.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Swapped the Eye2 54 * for SS 54* under the PGA Tour playability guarantee program.

 

I hit full and partial shots with it at the range today. It worked much better than the Eye 2 did for me. Head to head against the Stealth the distances were the same. The trajectory was slightly slower with the Glide 3. The Stealth felt MUCH softer.

 

Tomorrow AM I'll have an extended short game practice session with it. The one thing I liked about the Eye 2 is it would hop and stop. If I can get the consistency I had with the 54* ES with the SS, I will make the switch....

WITB (as of 11/14/20)
PING G410 PLUS 9*
PING G400 5-wood
PING G410 22*
Srixon Z565 5-PW
Cleveland CBX 2 50*
Cleveland CBX 2 54*
Cleveland CBX Full Face 58*
Cleveland Frontline Elevado
Titleist ProV1x

Link to post
Share on other sites

> @Drawman said:

> TXG did a spin comparison of a Vokey wedge and a Glide 3.0 wedge in wet conditions

).

>

> The results are astonishing.

>

> The Hydropearl 2.0 finish, while not as durable as the old PING finishes, does its job.

 

yep, really surprising! Also, these guys do some of the best videos out there, everyweek!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...