Jump to content

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, leftycabe said:

 

I'm not an engineer but as I understand it, the deeper face is used for the sole purpose of raising the center of gravity and lowering spin. That's why you see the better player's version of driver is almost always the deeper faced driver. Callaway's sub zero models are always deeper faced. The TSi3 is deeper faced than the TSi2. The same holds true for fairways woods. That's why the more shallow and stretched the wood is, the lower and further back the center of gravity is. Again, I could be completely wrong but that's my understanding. 

 

Sorry for taking away from the thread. Back to the SIM 2.0. Bring me a deep head and keep the same color scheme! Thanks!

Deep face brings cg foward and up. Whether not that means more spin depends on a of things-from what i understand, there will be more real estate on the face above the cg line, so if struck there it will bring spin down. Low in the face the shallow head with lower and back cg will spin much less than the deep face. Shallow head will be more consistent with vertical strike patterns where the deep face may offer more overall less spin but be much more varied in the vertical strike pattern. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 2.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

If you want pics give this post a like.  

It would be awesome if going forwards the original forum on a club release was limited to discussion of testing results and specs of the club ordered by members, and a second forum was created for peo

Given that the average WRXer swings at 135mph with a 1.52 smash factor I would say their swings generate more heat than any carbon jet is capable of making. With that said Taylormade probably had to d

Posted Images

On 10/22/2020 at 6:46 PM, Red4282 said:

I think one area where a few manufacturers have found extra speed is moving the cog as far out in the toe as they can. Ping and TM are two that come to mind. Since the toe is the fastest moving part of the club, sometimes several miles an hour faster, having the cog out there offers more potential. The Downside (or upside-depending on the golfer) is very fade biased driver.

Solid observation. I have always preferred to dial loft down in order to open the face, but that’s not necessary with the sim or g410lst.  

  • Like 1

WITB

 

SIM 9.0 Diamana TB Stiff or PXG Proto X+

XR Pro 18 Speeder stiff

PXG 22 Hybrid Evenflow 80G CB Stiff

Ping I210 or 2020 P770 

Glide 2.0 

Scotty 5.5M with custom welded neck

Pro V1X with Alignment aid

Way too many golf bags, but K1-LO walking and Ping Tour Stand riding

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/23/2020 at 11:37 AM, leftycabe said:

 

I'm not an engineer but as I understand it, the deeper face is used for the sole purpose of raising the center of gravity and lowering spin. That's why you see the better player's version of driver is almost always the deeper faced driver. Callaway's sub zero models are always deeper faced. The TSi3 is deeper faced than the TSi2. The same holds true for fairways woods. That's why the more shallow and stretched the wood is, the lower and further back the center of gravity is. Again, I could be completely wrong but that's my understanding. 

 

Sorry for taking away from the thread. Back to the SIM 2.0. Bring me a deep head and keep the same color scheme! Thanks!

 

On 10/23/2020 at 12:17 PM, Red4282 said:

Deep face brings cg foward and up. Whether not that means more spin depends on a of things-from what i understand, there will be more real estate on the face above the cg line, so if struck there it will bring spin down. Low in the face the shallow head with lower and back cg will spin much less than the deep face. Shallow head will be more consistent with vertical strike patterns where the deep face may offer more overall less spin but be much more varied in the vertical strike pattern. 


Red is correct in that a taller face will almost always bring CG forward and up, which will increase spin on average for most people and is why elements of that type of design are falling out of style a bit (also why virtually no driver that fits that high/forward CG design has ever stuck around long). I would argue that the "better player's version" of a given driver model has become a bit obsolete and has since switched a bit. With the SIM line, the shallowest face (SIM Standard) is considered to be the "better player's model" and the deepest face is the most "weekend golfer" model in the SIM MAX D. Also, previous versions of the "player's" model saw consistently less representation on tour. The M5 Tour, M3 440, M1 440, and M1 430 were all less popular than their 460 counterparts and really started highlighting the shift away from the smaller, deeper faced driver. That is just Taylormade however, and I think PING has been more successful with their LST versions in this regard, but the trend has still been moving towards pushing CG further and further back while often saving the big shift down for a new product line. SLDR -> M-Series and then each subsequent M-series release followed this pattern, as did the M-Series -> SIM transition. Titleist did it big time with the 917 -> TS and PING made a big move from G -> G400, particularly with the 400 MAX. 

It is all interesting stuff to follow because the shifts in CG both up/down and forward/back are really what mark the noticeable performance changes, while the little interim tech bits (Twist Face, SurefitCG, Flash Face, Geocoustic, Speed Injection, Infinity/Milled Face, Dragonfly Technology, different types of weight adjustment etc...) serve to fill the gaps between these big shifts. Keeping track of this pattern is useful from a consumer standpoint too if you're someone that really only wants to change drivers when those big shifts happen, and not when the small iterations are being tinkered with in between. 

Edited by Valtiel
  • Like 4

Taylormade SIM 10.5* Diamana X'17 70TX 
Taylormade SIM Ti V2 15* Kuro Kage XD 80TX || Taylormade SIM Ti Tour Issue 16* HZRDUS T1100 95g
Taylormade M5 19* Tensei Pro White 90TX || Taylormade GAPR Lo 3 19* Kuro Kage 100XTS Hybrid
Taylormade RSI UDI 20* Project X PXi 7.0
Bridgestone J40 DPC 4i-7i 23*- 35* Brunswick Precision Rifle FCM 7.0
Bridgestone J40 CB 8i-PW 39*- 48* Brunswick Precision Rifle FCM 7.0
Taylormade Milled Grind Raw 54* Brunswick Precision Rifle FCM 7.0
Vokey SM6 58* Oil Can Low Bounce K-Grind Brunswick Precision Rifle FCM 7.0
Scotty Cameron Newport Tour Red Dot || Scotty Cameron Newport 2 Pro Platinum

Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Valtiel said:

 


Red is correct in that a taller face will almost always bring CG forward and up, which will increase spin on average for most people and is why elements of that type of design are falling out of style a bit (also why virtually no driver that fits that high/forward CG design has ever stuck around long). I would argue that the "better player's version" of a given driver model has become a bit obsolete and has since switched a bit. With the SIM line, the shallowest face (SIM Standard) is considered to be the "better player's model" and the deepest face is the most "weekend golfer" model in the SIM MAX D. Also, previous versions of the "player's" model saw consistently less representation on tour. The M5 Tour, M3 440, M1 440, and M1 430 were all less popular than their 460 counterparts and really started highlighting the shift away from the smaller, deeper faced driver. That is just Taylormade however, and I think PING has been more successful with their LST versions in this regard, but the trend has still been moving towards pushing CG further and further back while often saving the big shift down for a new product line. SLDR -> M-Series and then each subsequent M-series release followed this pattern, as did the M-Series -> SIM transition. Titleist did it big time with the 917 -> TS and PING made a big move from G -> G400, particularly with the 400 MAX. 

It is all interesting stuff to follow because the shifts in CG both up/down and forward/back are really what mark the noticeable performance changes, while the little interim tech bits (Twist Face, SurefitCG, Flash Face, Geocoustic, Speed Injection, Infinity/Milled Face, Dragonfly Technology, different types of weight adjustment etc...) serve to fill the gaps between these big shifts. Keeping track of this pattern is useful from a consumer standpoint too if you're someone that really only wants to change drivers when those big shifts happen, and not when the small iterations are being tinkered with in between. 

Great post and content. I do think generally someone with a very positive AOA generally likes the deep face drivers. They want to tee it up and hit up. Neutral or negative angle of attack will probably be better off or gravitate towards a little shallower head and tee it a touch lower. Obviously there are exceptions, as rory is very positive and is playing the SIM. One thing that pleasantly surprised me about the SIM was just how low spin it is low on the face. Typically other drivers tend to balloon for me when struck there, 3500+spin. For SIM, i rarely see anything over 2700. Im very neutral and do prefer teeing it down a notch, just mainly because of all the wind we deal with here. The SIM has been a perfect match for me in all phases.

Edited by Red4282
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Valtiel said:

 


Red is correct in that a taller face will almost always bring CG forward and up, which will increase spin on average for most people and is why elements of that type of design are falling out of style a bit (also why virtually no driver that fits that high/forward CG design has ever stuck around long). I would argue that the "better player's version" of a given driver model has become a bit obsolete and has since switched a bit. With the SIM line, the shallowest face (SIM Standard) is considered to be the "better player's model" and the deepest face is the most "weekend golfer" model in the SIM MAX D. Also, previous versions of the "player's" model saw consistently less representation on tour. The M5 Tour, M3 440, M1 440, and M1 430 were all less popular than their 460 counterparts and really started highlighting the shift away from the smaller, deeper faced driver. That is just Taylormade however, and I think PING has been more successful with their LST versions in this regard, but the trend has still been moving towards pushing CG further and further back while often saving the big shift down for a new product line. SLDR -> M-Series and then each subsequent M-series release followed this pattern, as did the M-Series -> SIM transition. Titleist did it big time with the 917 -> TS and PING made a big move from G -> G400, particularly with the 400 MAX. 

It is all interesting stuff to follow because the shifts in CG both up/down and forward/back are really what mark the noticeable performance changes, while the little interim tech bits (Twist Face, SurefitCG, Flash Face, Geocoustic, Speed Injection, Infinity/Milled Face, Dragonfly Technology, different types of weight adjustment etc...) serve to fill the gaps between these big shifts. Keeping track of this pattern is useful from a consumer standpoint too if you're someone that really only wants to change drivers when those big shifts happen, and not when the small iterations are being tinkered with in between. 

Impressive. Helpful too! Mad props if you wrote that in under 10 minutes. 🙂  Thanks for sharing the knowledge. Good to clarify CG impact and changes.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Red4282 said:

Great post and content. I do think generally someone with a very positive AOA generally likes the deep face drivers. They want to tee it up and hit up. Neutral or negative angle of attack will probably be better off or gravitate towards a little shallower head and tee it a touch lower. Obviously there are exceptions, as rory is very positive and is playing the SIM. One thing that pleasantly surprised me about the SIM was just how low spin it is low on the face. Typically other drivers tend to balloon for me when struck there, 3500+spin. For SIM, i rarely see anything over 2700. Im very neutral and do prefer teeing it down a notch, just mainly because of all the wind we deal with here. The SIM has been a perfect match for me in all phases.


Thanks! And yeah, I think that definitely depends on the player. I am pretty positive in terms of AoA and I actually just received my SIM as I am finding I prefer shallower faces. There is no getting around that a shallower face will be more consistent in terms of numbers, both speed and spin. With the deeper faces generally pulling CG forward and up, all of that extra face will subject to the ill effects of said CG tendencies, a "worst of both worlds" IMO. The deeper the face and the higher the CG, the more physical face there is below that CG which will yield worse and worse results the deeper it gets. It also just creates such a stark visual shift from fairway woods/hybrids, and I have a tendency to catch deeper faced drivers low with trying to hit up more just because I can not bring myself to tee the ball up into the stratosphere (comparatively) like you have to do with those.

I much prefer the shallower face of the SIM, at least so far in terms of the eye test. I found the same benefits with fairway woods too, particularly in the 3-wood which is a club that I primarily turn over, and thus really need that tight spin window that you get from a shallower face. That TXG test they did with fairway face depth really resonated with what I had found in my own testing, and all the same concepts apply to the driver just as much. 

 

10 minutes ago, Nickthurgood said:

Impressive. Helpful too! Mad props if you wrote that in under 10 minutes. 🙂  Thanks for sharing the knowledge. Good to clarify CG impact and changes.  


Hah thanks! Probably around 15 minutes if i'm honest. 😛

I definitely believe that all the CG "magic" going on under the hood is the foundation of modern driver performance, and was treated as such from a marketing standpoint until guys like Golftec and MG$ started publishing them. Even still, understanding gear effects are key to appreciating what those published numbers even mean, but it really does reveal a lot about why certain drivers were more popular than others, and especially interesting when it comes to cult followings and the odd much older model driver still seeing tour use. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2

Taylormade SIM 10.5* Diamana X'17 70TX 
Taylormade SIM Ti V2 15* Kuro Kage XD 80TX || Taylormade SIM Ti Tour Issue 16* HZRDUS T1100 95g
Taylormade M5 19* Tensei Pro White 90TX || Taylormade GAPR Lo 3 19* Kuro Kage 100XTS Hybrid
Taylormade RSI UDI 20* Project X PXi 7.0
Bridgestone J40 DPC 4i-7i 23*- 35* Brunswick Precision Rifle FCM 7.0
Bridgestone J40 CB 8i-PW 39*- 48* Brunswick Precision Rifle FCM 7.0
Taylormade Milled Grind Raw 54* Brunswick Precision Rifle FCM 7.0
Vokey SM6 58* Oil Can Low Bounce K-Grind Brunswick Precision Rifle FCM 7.0
Scotty Cameron Newport Tour Red Dot || Scotty Cameron Newport 2 Pro Platinum

Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, ASN21 said:

Big focus will be on more forgiveness

🤐

TM SIM 9.0 with Tensei Pro White 60-S

TM SIM 15 deg 3W with Project X Smoke Green S

TM M3 3H & 4H with Fujikura Atmos Blue HB Tour Spec 8X

TM P790 5i with KBS $-Taper 120

TM P760 6-PW with KBS $-Taper 120

TM Hi Toe 50, 55 & 60 with DG S300

Odyssey 34" Stroke Lab 10 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, ASN21 said:

Big focus will be on more forgiveness

Sounds promising, as long as they don't use the word MAX at all.  

Titleist TSi3 9.25*  HZRDUS Smoke Green 6.5tx 
Titleist TSi3 5W 18* Tensei AV Raw White- x
Srixon Z 745 (4-pw) KBS tour-x
Mizuno T20 51* 54* 60* TT x-100
Callaway PM Grind 64*
SC Studio Design no. 2
Pro V1

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/27/2020 at 11:42 AM, TaylorMade Golf said:

🤣 Pretty close

 

If your coming to the party you need to bring a dish.  So far you've come empty handed, not good manners :WTF:

  • Haha 2

Titleist TSi3 8* / Fuji Ventus Black 6X                  

Taylormade SIM2 Ti 15* / Fuji Ventus Black 7X               

Cally Mav Pro 20*  / Fuji Ventus Black 10TX

Honma 737V / Mitsubishi MMT 125TX

Cally MD5 50*,54*,60* / Mitsu MMT 125TX

Odyssey Versa #6




 

Link to post
Share on other sites

loved my sim max woods - the best I've used.

Don't think they can improve in 2021 unless they give us a sim max fairway with a hosel.  Or Come out with a glued 4 wood. 

 

My 15 Deg 3 wood goes too far.

 

SIM 2 MAX 10.5 TOUR AD DI 6

SIM 2 MAX 3HL TOUR AD DI 7

 

T100S 

VOKEY SM8 52 56 60

 

SCOTTY SQUAREBACK

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, tigerfan23 said:

loved my sim max woods - the best I've used.

Don't think they can improve in 2021 unless they give us a sim max fairway with a hosel.  Or Come out with a glued 4 wood. 

 

My 15 Deg 3 wood goes too far.

 

Would love to see sim max fairways with an adjustable hosel

Edited by enfuego
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Our picks

    • 2021 RBC Heritage - discussions and links
      Please post any questions and comments here.
       
      2021 RBC Heritage - Tuesday #1
      2021 RBC Heritage - Tuesday #2
      2021 RBC Heritage - Tuesday #3
      2021 RBC Heritage - Tuesday #4
      2021 RBC Heritage - Tuesday #5
      2021 RBC Heritage - Tuesday #6
      2021 RBC Heritage - Tuesday #7
      2021 RBC Heritage - Tuesday #8
      2021 RBC Heritage - Tuesday #9
      2021 RBC Heritage - Tuesday #10
       

       
      2021 RBC Heritage - Tuesday #1
      2021 RBC Heritage - Tuesday #2
      2021 RBC Heritage - Tuesday #3
      2021 RBC Heritage - Tuesday #4
      2021 RBC Heritage - Tuesday #5
      2021 RBC Heritage - Tuesday #6
      2021 RBC Heritage - Tuesday #7
      2021 RBC Heritage - Tuesday #8
      2021 RBC Heritage - Tuesday #9
      2021 RBC Heritage - Tuesday #10
       
       

       
      Custom Cameron putters - 2021 RBC Heritage
      Bettinardi putter - 2021 RBC Heritage
      Robert Streb's custom stamped Vokey wedge - 2021 RBC Heritage
      Ben An's custom stamped Vokey - 2021 RBC Heritage
      • 7 replies
    • 2021 Valero Texas Open - discussion & links
      Please put any questions or comments here. 
       
      This week, the PGA Tour is at TPC San Antonio on the Oaks Course for the Valero Texas Open. GolfWRX was on-site Tuesday to catch a glimpse into the bags of some of the world’s top golfers.
       
      The field of 144 is getting ready to battle starting Thursday for the $7.7 million purse, with $1.386 million going to the winner. The tournament is also the last event where players can qualify for The Masters, just like Canadian Corey Conners did last year.
       
      Check out our "Most interesting photos" Part 1, and Part 2.
       

       
      2021 Valero Texas Open - Tuesday #1 2021 Valero Texas Open - Tuesday #2 2021 Valero Texas Open - Tuesday #3 2021 Valero Texas Open - Tuesday #4 2021 Valero Texas Open - Tuesday #5 2021 Valero Texas Open - Tuesday #6 2021 Valero Texas Open - Tuesday #7 2021 Valero Texas Open - Tuesday #8  


       
      Cameron putters (added Bernd Wiesberger's custom T-11) -2021 Valero Texas Open Piretti putters -2021 Valero Texas Open Branden Grace testing AutoFlex shaft @ 2021 Valero Texas Open  
      Check out our "Most interesting photos" Part 1, and Part 2.
       

       
      • 29 replies
    • **GIVEAWAY** Odyssey Ten Triple Track Putter! ENTER NOW!
      NEW Odyssey Ten Triple Track putter giveaway!!!.To enter reply in this thread that you're IN!
       
      That's it. You'll be entered into the giveaway (one entry per person). Winner chosen at random in two weeks. Be sure to check out the attached pics. Good luck!
       
      If you are not a member her please register here to allow you to reply to this post and enter. Registration is free... https://forums.golfwrx.com/register/
      ======================================================================================================
      We randomize all the number of posts and the #1 number on the top is the winner. Say there is 1,000 replies from members. We will randomize 1 to 1,000 using a website that has a randomizer. It scrambles the numbers and the #1 is the first place and the #2 is the second etc. If the winner has duplicate entries we count the first
       





       
      • 1,599 replies
    • 2021 WGC Dell Technologies Match Play - discussion and links
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       

       
      2021 WGC Dell Technologies Match Play - Monday #1
      2021 WGC Dell Technologies Match Play - Monday #2
      2021 WGC Dell Technologies Match Play - Monday #3
      2021 WGC Dell Technologies Match Play - Monday #4
      2021 WGC Dell Technologies Match Play - Monday #5
      2021 WGC Dell Technologies Match Play - Monday #6
       
       

       
      Hideki testing putters at WGC Dell Technologies Match Play
      Odyssey/Toulon Atlanta putter - 2021 WGC Dell Technologies Match Play
      Cameron putters - 2021 WGC Dell Technologies Match Play
      Patrick Reed testing TPT shafts 2021 WGC Dell Technologies Match Play
       
       
        • Like
      • 54 replies
    • 2021 Players - discussion and links
      Please post any questions or comments here
       
       

       
      2021 Players - Monday #1
      2021 Players - Monday #2
      2021 Players - Monday #3
      2021 Players - Monday #4
      2021 Players - Tuesday #1
      2021 Players - Tuesday #2
      2021 Players - Tuesday #3
      2021 Players - Tuesday #4
      2021 Players - Tuesday #5
      2021 Players - Tuesday #6
       
       

       
      Maverick McNealy's custom 1 of 1 Callaway Apex MB irons - 2021 Players
      Adam Long's Cameron T-5 proto - 2021 Players
      Abraham Ancer's custom Muira irons and custom MMT shafts - 2021 Players
      Bettinardi putters & cover - 2021 Players
      Jon Rahm's bag - 2021 Players
      Xander Schauffele's bag - 2021 Players
      Sergio with a Cameron putter - 2021 Players
      Cameron T11 & 11.5 putters - 2021 Players
      Sergio Garcia's clubs - 2021 Players
      Scott Brown's Odyssey gamer - 2021 Players
       
       
       
      • 52 replies

×
×
  • Create New...