Jump to content

To weaken lofts, or not to weaken lofts, that is the question


LUXOR54
 Share

Recommended Posts

Right now I'm a click away from buying a set of PXG 0211 ST blades 5-PW+G. Only thought is if I should weaken the lofts or not. Every iron set I've played in the last few years has had pretty traditional lofts and even gapping. My current RAZR X musclebacks are a 35° 7 iron that I can hit 170 yards, with even 4° gapping from 5-P. The PXG's are a 32° 7 iron, and have 5° gaps from 8-G, 4° gaps from 6-8, and a 3° gap from 5-6. Very similar to that of T100S. I don't know if I'm overthinking this, but I'd like to get the opinion of you tinkerers out there. Should I weaken the lofts by one or two degrees to make them more traditional, or just keep them stock and blast them out there

Edited by LUXOR54
Grammar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pick a reference club, either your longest or shortest, and adjust the lofts to get the yardage gaps you want.

 

Strictly speaking the actual loft is irrelevant unless you need to change it by a large amount to get the gap you want.

 

Personally I start from my LW and go up from there.

  • Thanks 1

Cobra RAD Speed 9* : KBS TD 70 Cat 3 / Ventus Blue 6-S

Cobra RAD Speed 3W : Graphite Design AD TP8-S

Srixon ZXU #2 : Nippon Modus 3 120-S

Wilson Staff CB 4-PW : Nippon Modus3 120-S

Cleveland Zipcore 50, 54: Nippon Modus2 120/125 S 

Cobra MIM Black 58 : Nippon 125 Wedge

Piretti Potenza 370g : Breakthrough Technology Stability Shaft - 34"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

95% of GolfWRX orders must include strengthened/weakened lofts and hard/soft stepped shafts 🤦‍♂️.  

 

The club is designed to be played at its stock loft.  The CG and static loft work together. 

  • Thanks 1

Ping G425LST 9* / Fujikura Motore Speeder TS 6.3X
Titleist TSi2 16.5* / Graphite Design DI-7X Black

Titleist TSi2 21* / Graphite Design DI-8X Black
Mizuno JPX 900 Tour 4-PW / Nippon Modus 120X
Titleist SM7 52.08F* / Nippon Modus 120X
Titleist SM7 56.08M* / KBS Tour 610 S+
Titleist SM7 60.04L* / KBS Tour 610 S+
Spider X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, tlehmann said:

95% of GolfWRX orders must include strengthened/weakened lofts and hard/soft stepped shafts 🤦‍♂️.  

 

The club is designed to be played at its stock loft.  The CG and static loft work together. 

That's what I figured, the guys that designed it know better than me. Just going to be a departure from what I'm used to, hopefully a successful experiment

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whenever im on the course there is always a calculation for uphill or downhill and wind as well as wind direction, not to mention if its cold in the morning or hot in the afternoon.  All those situations require me to add or subtract yards,  it should be relatively easy to calculate if your 170 club becomes your 175 or 178 club ???

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never owned a set of irons where the gapping was out of whack. With each new set I did have to figure out the distance I got from each club, but that was a fairly easy process. I wouldn't do any loft or lie adjusting before playing the clubs. You've got to be sure if something is broken before you go about fixing it.

  • Like 2

Cleveland Launcher HB Driver 10.5 degree

Cleveland Launcher Halo Hybrids 16, 19, 22 degree

Cleveland Launcher HB Irons 5-SW

Cleveland CBX 2 Wedge 60 degree

All with senior flex graphite shafts

JumboMax Ultra Lite size M on driver, size S on the rest

Taylor Made Daddy Long Legs putter, Winn Dri-Tac Jumbo Lite Pistol Putter Grip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, greenj20 said:

Get a PXG fitting. $50 and the mobile van will come to your local range or you can go to the nearest one they work out of. They will get you on a trackman and you can see the gaps for yourself.

Not a big presence up north yet unfortunately, closest fitter seems to be about 2 hours away each way, and attached to a private club. Most grass ranges and courses are closing down here this weekend. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LUXOR54 said:

Not a big presence up north yet unfortunately, closest fitter seems to be about 2 hours away each way, and attached to a private club. Most grass ranges and courses are closing down here this weekend. 

Ah too bad. Got a club champion nearby? That is the only other way to demo some PXGs to my knowledge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weakening lofts does effect offset and bounce to some degree (no pun intended). That being said I always match my new set to my old, typically start at PW 48°. For me it helps keep distances consistant, but more importantly allows me to hit the ball high with spin with shorter clubs. All about preference, but I have never had an issue ordering them weak. Currently game ZX7s ordered weak and love them. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ignore the number stamped on the sole and go only by loft. I've played irons with a PW loft of 46 or 47 for the last 20 years. So whatever set I buy I make sure there is something at 46 or 47 degrees that I consider the PW and then work back toward my shortest hybrid (which is 24*).

 

My current set is a blended set of Titleist AP1's (6-8) and AP2's (8-PW). I have two 8 irons but they are 4 degrees apart. I built the AP2's to standard length and the AP1's 1/2 inch over length. Then I took a paint pen and marked each of the AP1's one iron number less (so the 6 iron is marked 5, etc.) That way I don't ever get myself confused and I can keep calling the irons the same number I have called them for the last 20 years despite the fact that Titleist jacked the lofts on the AP1's.

 

IMG_4367.jpg.4aab0f5a6443ecc323ac5d4efc8f872e.jpg

Edited by Mustard_Tiger
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Mustard_Tiger said:

I ignore the number stamped on the sole and go only by loft. I've played irons with a PW loft of 46 or 47 for the last 20 years. So whatever set I buy I make sure there is something at 46 or 47 degrees that I consider the PW and then work back toward my shortest hybrid (which is 24*).

 

My current set is a blended set of Titleist AP1's (6-8) and AP2's (8-PW). I have two 8 irons but they are 4 degrees apart. I built the AP2's to standard length and the AP1's 1/2 inch over length. Then I took a paint pen and marked each of the AP1's one iron number less (so the 6 iron is marked 5, etc.) That way I don't ever get myself confused and I can keep calling the irons the same number I have called them for the last 20 years despite the fact that Titleist jacked the lofts on the AP1's.

 

IMG_4367.jpg.4aab0f5a6443ecc323ac5d4efc8f872e.jpg

Actually this is a really good point and post. A lot of sets are doing attack wedges close to PW traditional lofts. Great point. I know a PGA Professional that just got his T100/T200 combo and carries a 4i in each! All in the gapping. Great post

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, tlehmann said:

The club is designed to be played at its stock loft.  The CG and static loft work together. 

 

No.  The stock specs are designed to first and foremost sell clubs and secondarily work (arbitrarily) well for average customers.   There is nothing magic or special about the specs that are guaranteed to work well for all customers.

 

Distance gaps frequently need to be adjusted.

 

Then there is the question of whether to adjust the wedges to sync (gap well) with the iron set - or adjust the iron set to sync with the wedges.    There is no right or wrong way to do that - it's purely personal preference.

 

Edited by Stuart_G
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dropped a long iron and had to add a 2nd gap wedge when I changed from mp68 to mp18 because everything was a couple of degrees stronger and I couldn't get my gaps to work at the bottom end. Found that a 49 worked well and bridged the gap nicely between the new slightly stronger pw and the 52 gap wedge that I am used to playing. 

 

That way I managed to not affect the bottom end of my bag that was working well whilst maintaining a sensible gapping through the bag. I had to tweak a couple of lofts by a degree here or there for everything to gap nicely but it was purely for yardage gaps and not to make the lofts look good on paper. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Stuart_G said:

 

No.  The stock specs are designed to first and foremost sell clubs and secondarily work (arbitrarily) well for average customers.   There is nothing magic or special about the specs that are guaranteed to work well for all customers.

 

Distance gaps frequently need to be adjusted.

 

Then there is the question of whether to adjust the wedges to sync (gap well) with the iron set - or adjust the iron set to sync with the wedges.    There is no right or wrong way to do that - it's purely personal preference.

 

No.  The OP posted about matching lofts to his old set.  Stronger lofted sets like PXG have a low CG, the same way GI irons with mega strong lofts have the lowest CGs, and his MB irons with weak lofts have a high CG.  CG and lofts are designed to work together.  

 

If he delivers the club where he needs more loft and bounce, go ahead and bend them weak.  But for the sake of matching loft specs, the head designs are different.  Matching the lofts between two different head designs will create a different launch window.

  • Like 1

Ping G425LST 9* / Fujikura Motore Speeder TS 6.3X
Titleist TSi2 16.5* / Graphite Design DI-7X Black

Titleist TSi2 21* / Graphite Design DI-8X Black
Mizuno JPX 900 Tour 4-PW / Nippon Modus 120X
Titleist SM7 52.08F* / Nippon Modus 120X
Titleist SM7 56.08M* / KBS Tour 610 S+
Titleist SM7 60.04L* / KBS Tour 610 S+
Spider X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, LUXOR54 said:

That's what I figured, the guys that designed it know better than me. Just going to be a departure from what I'm used to, hopefully a successful experiment


But the designer dont know your club speed or angle of attach, but you should wait with adjustment until you have tried them off, and adjust for actual gaps on carry and the stopping power you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Howard_Jones said:


But the designer dont know your club speed or angle of attach, but you should wait with adjustment until you have tried them off, and adjust for actual gaps on carry and the stopping power you want.

Fair enough, looks like it's going to require some tinkering. I might end up going with the new level PF-1 irons over the PXG, for the same setup the PXG's are nearly twice as expensive. A good chunk of that is $50 CAD upcharge per club for KBS tour, a shaft most other manufacturers charge nothing extra, or a slight increase for, left a bit of a sour taste in my mouth

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, tlehmann said:

No.  The OP posted about matching lofts to his old set.  Stronger lofted sets like PXG have a low CG, the same way GI irons with mega strong lofts have the lowest CGs, and his MB irons with weak lofts have a high CG.  CG and lofts are designed to work together.  

 

If he delivers the club where he needs more loft and bounce, go ahead and bend them weak.  But for the sake of matching loft specs, the head designs are different.  Matching the lofts between two different head designs will create a different launch window.

 

When we look at independently measured COG, like the raw data published by the Golfworks (Maltby), we find that there is no correlation between stronger lofts and lower COG...and vice versa.  In fact many of the stronger lofted designs actually have a higher COG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LUXOR54 said:

Fair enough, looks like it's going to require some tinkering. I might end up going with the new level PF-1 irons over the PXG, for the same setup the PXG's are nearly twice as expensive. A good chunk of that is $50 CAD upcharge per club for KBS tour, a shaft most other manufacturers charge nothing extra, or a slight increase for, left a bit of a sour taste in my mouth

I would look at PXG at some point too but their shaft pricing is absurd. I don’t mind paying premium price for clubheads but paying big up charge for stuff over an elevate shaft is a big turn off for me

COBRA RADSPEED 9.0 HZRDUS RDX BLUE 6.0                                        SRIXON ZX 13.5 MIYAZAKI MIZORE 70X                                               WILSON M5 TOUR 17* ALDILA ROGUE STIFF.                                           TITLEIST U510 3 ALDILA PHENOM 100 stiff.                                       SRIXON Z FORGED 4-PW CATALYST 100 6.5                                         SRIXON ZX7 A WEDGE 50* CATALYST 100 6.0                                        CALLAWAY JAWS FULL 54* MMT 125 Stiff.                                        CALLAWAY JAWS FULL 58* MMT 125 Stiff.                                         NATIONAL CUSTOM NICOLL BLADE SNELL MTB-X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, tlehmann said:

No.  The OP posted about matching lofts to his old set. 

 

No.  He specifically asked the question about going with the stock lofts or going back to more traditional lofts.   He didn't say anything about trying to match anything.

 

15 hours ago, tlehmann said:

Stronger lofted sets like PXG have a low CG, the same way GI irons with mega strong lofts have the lowest CGs, and his MB irons with weak lofts have a high CG.  CG and lofts are designed to work together.  

 

No.  They really are not.  c.g. has some effect but not that much.   It's all about the loft jacking battles between the OEM's. 

 

Note, that's not a judgement, it's just a statement of fact about how and why the lofts are changing as much as they are.   And there are enough threads on the topic that I have no interest in or continuing that one here.  It is what it is.

 

 

15 hours ago, tlehmann said:

If he delivers the club where he needs more loft and bounce, go ahead and bend them weak.  But for the sake of matching loft specs, the head designs are different.  Matching the lofts between two different head designs will create a different launch window.

 

It's true that he should not automatically assume that the old lofts will give the old performance.  But on the other hand there is nothing special or magic about the new lofts either.

 

But the bottom line is yes, bending decisions should be based on actual performance and carry distances he gets with his swing AND how he wants those carry distances to fit and merge with the rest of his clubs (wedges, hybrids, fairways, etc...).   Most will want to put the emphasis on the transition between the wedge distances and the short iron distance.     Rarely will the distances automatically fit well with existing wedges when there are large loft changes in the irons.  So the big question really tends to be - 1) adjust the wedges (or even add a new one) vs 2) adjusting the irons.   There is no real big advantage or disadvantage either way (unless maybe you count the cost of a new wedge a disadvantage).

 

 

Edited by Stuart_G
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Our picks

    • 2021 RSM Classic - Discussion and Links
      2021 RSM Classic - Monday
      2021 RSM Classic - Tuesday #1
      2021 RSM Classic - Tuesday #2
       
       
      Trey Mullinax - WITB - 2021 RSM Classic
      Brett Drewitt - WITB - 2021 RSM Classic
      Matt Wallace - WITB - 2021 RSM Classic
      Josh Creel - WITB - 2021 RSM Classic
      Ben Crane - WITB - 2021 RSM Classic
      Justin Lower - WITB - 2021 RSM Classic
      Adam Svensson - WITB - 2021 RSM Classic
      Brendon Todd - WITB - 2021 RSM Classic
      Webb Simpson - WITB - 2021 RSM Classic
      Chesson Hadley - WITB - 2021 RSM Classic
      Kiradech Aphibarnrat - WITB - 2021 RSM Classic
      Bill Haas - WITB - 2021 RSM Classic
      Max Homa - WITB - 2021 RSM Classic
      Nick Watney - WITB - 2021 RSM Classic
       
       
      New Odyssey Tri Hot putters - 2021 RSM Classic
       
       
       
       
      • 2 replies
    • 2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open - Discussion & Links
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
      Pat Perez - WITB @ 2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open
      Tony Finau - WITB @ 2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open
      Kramer Hickok - WITB @ 2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open
      Paul Barjon - WITB @ 2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open
      Nate Lashley - WITB @ 2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open
      Seamus Powers - WITB @ 2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open
      Dylan Frittelli - WITB @ 2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open
      C.T. Pan - WITB @ 2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open
      Chase Koepka - WITB @ 2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open
      Branden Grace - WITB @ 2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open
      Marc Leishman - WITB @ 2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open
      Martin Laird - WITB @ 2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open
      Shane Lowery - WITB - @ 2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open
       
      Cameron CT T-11 putter - WITB @ 2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open
      New Graphite Design shafts - WITB @ 2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open
      Cameron cover from 2021 ZOZO Championship - @ 2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open
      Bettinardi covers - @ 2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open
      Cameron CT putters - @ 2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open
       
       
      2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open - Tuesday #1
      2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open - Tuesday #2
      2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open - Tuesday #3
      2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open - Tuesday #4
      2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open - Wednesday #1
      2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open - Wednesday #2
      2021 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Houston Open - Wednesday #3
       
       
       
       
      • 1 reply
    • APPLY NOW: L.A.B. Golf MEZZ.1 Putter (Early Access) Member Testing! 10 Testers Needed!
      L.A.B. Golf is choosing ten GolfWRX members to receive their MEZZ.1 putter early and put their brand new product to the test before reporting back to the community about what they see. The selected testers will be one of the first to experience the MEZZ.1 from L.A.B. GOLF, their newest Lie Angle Balanced design, ahead of it's January 2022 launch!
       
      About The L.A.B. Golf Mezz.1 Putter
      MEZZ.1 is our new mid-mallet putter that’s fully CNC machined from a billet of 6061 aircraft aluminum (body) and 303 stainless steel (midsection) to create our best-feeling — and we think best looking — putter to date. It includes 10 weights (eight on the bottom, two on the sides) that allow us to individually build each putter to a golfer’s exact specifications.
       
      How To Apply
      In a post below, answer the following questions.
       
      1. City, State?
      2. Handicap?
      3. What is your current putter?
      4. Have you ever used a L.A.B. Golf putter?
      5. Why do you want to review the MEAZZ.1 putter?
      6. Do you agree to participate in an ongoing testing thread, posting reviews and photos?
       
      That's it! @labgolf and GolfWRX will choose the testers in about 2 weeks! This testing event is for good-standing members in the USA only!
       
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 435 replies
    • 2021 CJ Cup at The Summit Club - Discussion and Links
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
      2021 CJ Cup at The Summit Club - Tuesday #1
      2021 CJ Cup at The Summit Club - Tuesday #2
       
       
      Adam Scott - WITB - 2021 CJ Cup at The Summit Club
      Justin Rose - WITB - 2021 CJ Cup at The Summit Club
      Collin Morikawa - WITB - 2021 CJ Cup at The Summit Club
      Jason Day - WITB - 2021 CJ Cup at The Summit Club
      Justin Thomas - WITB - 2021 CJ Cup @ The Summit Club
      Erik Van Rooyen - WITB - 2021 CJ Cup @ The Summit Club
      Matt Jones - WITB - 2021 CJ Cup at The Summit Club
      Cam Davis - WITB - 2021 CJ Cup at The Summit Club
      Cam Smith - WITB - 2021 CJ Cup at The Summit Club
      Byeong Hun An - WITB - 2021 CJ Cup at The Summit Club
      Min Kyu - WITB - 2021 CJ Cup at The Summit Club
      Joohyung Kim - WITB - 2021 CJ Cup @ The Summit Club
      Tommy Fleetwood - WITB - 2021 CJ Cup @ The Summit Club
      Jordan Spieth - WITB - 2021 CJ Cup @ The Summit Club
      Lucas Glover - WITB - 2021 CJ Cup @ The Summit Club
      Keegan Bradley - WITB - 2021 CJ Cup @ The Summit Club
       
       
       
      Gary Woodland's new Cameron putter - 2021 CJ Cup @ The Summit Club
      Kevin Na's new Odyssey/Toulon putter - 2021 CJ Cup @ The Summit Club
      Jucie wedges & Proto irons - 2021 CJ Cup at The Summit Club
       
       
       
       
      • 6 replies
    • 2021 Shriners Hospitals for Children Open WITB Photos- Discussion & Links
      Please put any questions or comments here...
       
      Links:
       
      Harry Higgs - WITB - 2021 Shriners Hospitals for Children Open
      Ian Poulter - WITB - 2021 Shriners Hospitals for Children Open
      Corey Conners - WITB - 2021 Shriners Hospitals for Children Open
      Harry Higgs - WITB - 2021 Shriners Hospitals for Children Open
      Matt NeSmith - WITB - 2021 Shriners Hospitals for Children Open
      Doug Ghim - WITB - 2021 Shriners Hospitals for Children Open
      New Cameron Las Vegas covers - 2021 Shriners Hospitals for Children Open
      New Project X HZRDUS Smoke RDX shafts - 2021 Shriners Hospitals doe Children Open
       
       

       
        • Like
      • 15 replies

×
×
  • Create New...