Jump to content

Effect of bending irons weak (loft) on offset


Reid

Recommended Posts

I've read that bending irons stronger (loft) will create more offset - is it safe to say that the opposite will also be true? I'm thinking of ordering a set of irons 2 degrees weak to match the lofts of my MP29's, and I am curious to see if this will change the way they look at address (with respect to offset). If there will be a difference, will it be that noticeable? Any help/advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any effect on the offset will be very slight. Unless you are ultra sensitive to the appearance of offset I wouldn't worry.

Ping G400 Max driver w/Aldila Rogue 125 Silver
Ping G425 5 wood & hybrid
Ping G30 irons w/Recoil 95

Ping G425 irons w/Accra ICWT 2.0 95
Ping Glide wedges w/Recoil 110
Ping Redwood Anser - the "real deal!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

weakrening the lofts will take some offset out but will also add 2* of bounce ti the clubs too

rymail00 2018 WITB [i][b] [url="http://www.golfwrx.com/forums/topic/1605910-rymail00-2018-witb-pic-heavy/"]http://www.golfwrx.c...witb-pic-heavy/[/url][/b][/i]

[size=3]TM M1 430 8.5* Tour Issue w/ Tensei CK Pro White 70s (with high gloss SLDR finish from Continental Golf)
Titleist 917 F3 15* D+ 80s
Titleist 915H 21* D+ 90s
Titleist 915H 24* D+ 90s
Titleist AP2 718, 5-50* Steelfiber i95s
Scratch TD DW 54* 58* KBS HiRev
Odyssey Metal X Milled 330M (current gamer) [/size]
[size=3]Ping Scottsdale TR B60[/size]
[size=3]TP Mills Heritage 349g [/size]
[size=3]Byron Morgan 006 355g [/size]
[size=3]Byron Morgan Makers Proof #4/5 solid copper [/size]
[size=3]C&L CL1 368g[/size]
Scotty Cameron Newport Studio Style

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Reid' timestamp='1318202040' post='3649431']
I've read that bending irons stronger (loft) will create more offset - is it safe to say that the opposite will also be true? I'm thinking of ordering a set of irons 2 degrees weak to match the lofts of my MP29's, and I am curious to see if this will change the way they look at address (with respect to offset). If there will be a difference, will it be that noticeable? Any help/advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks.
[/quote]

Yes, if you weaken the lofts, the offset will be decreased. This is all because as the face "tilts back more" from increasing the loft, the bottom of the face juts outward a little more in the process, thus reducing the offset. For a 2* increase in loft, you should see the offset reduced by 1.5mm. To a golfer with a LOT of experience looking at irons and with a discerning eye, this is noticeable. Typically though, a reduction in offset doesn't usually look odd unless the leading edge starts to look like it has moved out in front of the forward part of the hosel.

TOM

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

TOM, thanks for the actual impact numbers. I've tried to figure it out mathematically, but just couldn't get there. :beruo: Am I still correct in assuming that weakening a strong iron is 'better' from a design/performance standpoint than strengthening a weak iron (for the better player that is)? I remember something like that from a masterclass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me, the bigger question is the affect of adding 2* more bounce. I have noticed that when adding loft to an iron (and therefore adding bounce as well), sometimes it effects the feel (less solid at on impact). Tom, is there a technical reason for that? Does is effect club performance and turf interaction aside from a player having a more or less steep angle of attack?

TITLEIST TSI3 9* - HZRDUS T1100 HANDMADE 6.0 
PING G410 15* - MITZ TENSEI PRO ORANGE 70X
PING G410 17* & 19* - MITZ TENSEI BLUE X & EF BLACK X
SRIXON ZX7's - 4-PW w/SPECIAL, TOUR ISSUE, BLACK KBS TOUR V 125'S
CALLAWAY PM2 54* X & 58* X - ORIGINAL PX Satin 5.5's (HSx1)
ODYSSEY STROKE LAB EXO 7S - CUSTOM

SCOTTY CAMERON 2001 TOUR ISSUE 3x CHOCOLATE NEWPORT BEACH
2017 BRIDGESTONE B330 Tour #1's & TITLEIST PRO V #1'X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, so I spent my evening in the garage bending and rebending a MacGreggor 1025M 7 iron. Measure, bend, measure, bend...

 

Bottom line: bending 2 degrees weak changed the offset .029" (.74mm).

 

I respect the heck out of Tom, and play some of his clubs, but my numbers don't match his.

 

36* = .143" offset

38* = .114" offset

 

:blind:

 

 

 

37910544984_919444cfec_b.jpgIMG_2985 by nessism, on Flickr

 

26851946459_79887c4050_b.jpgIMG_2989 by nessism, on Flickr

 

26851946649_8e248ce2b6_b.jpgIMG_3009 by nessism, on Flickr

 

38571869946_6a7e07dde7_b.jpgIMG_3006 by nessism, on Flickr

 

IMG_3005 by nessism, on Flickr

 

26851946779_0808eeb95c_b.jpgIMG_2993 by nessism, on Flickr

  • Like 1

Ping G400 Max driver w/Aldila Rogue 125 Silver
Ping G425 5 wood & hybrid
Ping G30 irons w/Recoil 95

Ping G425 irons w/Accra ICWT 2.0 95
Ping Glide wedges w/Recoil 110
Ping Redwood Anser - the "real deal!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Hifade' timestamp='1318261321' post='3652129']
For me, the bigger question is the affect of adding 2* more bounce. I have noticed that when adding loft to an iron (and therefore adding bounce as well), sometimes it effects the feel (less solid at on impact). Tom, is there a technical reason for that? Does is effect club performance and turf interaction aside from a player having a more or less steep angle of attack?
[/quote]

HIfade

For the vast majority of golfers and turf conditions, a 2* increase in the sole angle is really not going to affect anything because it is very slight. Only if the turf is really firm would this little of a bounce increase cause much of a change in the way the sole feels as it travels through the ground.

TOM

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

[quote name='TomWishon' timestamp='1318344847' post='3656981']
[quote name='Hifade' timestamp='1318261321' post='3652129']
For me, the bigger question is the affect of adding 2* more bounce. I have noticed that when adding loft to an iron (and therefore adding bounce as well), sometimes it effects the feel (less solid at on impact). Tom, is there a technical reason for that? Does is effect club performance and turf interaction aside from a player having a more or less steep angle of attack?
[/quote]

HIfade

For the vast majority of golfers and turf conditions, a 2* increase in the sole angle is really not going to affect anything because it is very slight. Only if the turf is really firm would this little of a bounce increase cause much of a change in the way the sole feels as it travels through the ground.

TOM
[/quote]

Sorry to threadjack but I have a similar question regarding the effects of bending and with your experience, I am pretty sure you can give me a definite answer.

Is there a way to bend a club stronger without adding offset? I play my irons with the following specs:

3: 20 (1* strong)
4: 24 (std)
5: 28 (1* weak)
6: 32 (1* weak)
7: 36 (1* weak)
8: 40 (1* weak)
9: 45 (2* weak)

I've been playing the 710MB for 1 season with these specs and find that this is the ideal setup for my game (look and playability). I will need to replace them for next season because the grooves are worn out and after trying the new 712 line, I really liked the MB but was also really surprised by the forgiveness and feel of the new AP2. The only thing that I don't like is the extra offset on the AP2 especially in the long iron (mostly the 3 iron because I need to bend it stronger). Is there a way to compensate for it? Ideally, I'd love to play the 712 AP2 but with less offset since it would be easier for me to shape shots both ways.

Thanks for your help

Math

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you mention what type of clubs you are planning to order weaker lofts on? I ask because it could also affect ball flight. Some club companies make lofts stronger but lower the COG to obtain higher flight. If you order them weak and they have a lower COG than what you are accustomed to... they may launch much higher. Just food for thought beyond the issues of offset and bounce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='imaplus3wannaplay' timestamp='1323570317' post='3922565']
Did you mention what type of clubs you are planning to order weaker lofts on? I ask because it could also affect ball flight. Some club companies make lofts stronger but lower the COG to obtain higher flight. If you order them weak and they have a lower COG than what you are accustomed to... they may launch much higher. Just food for thought beyond the issues of offset and bounce.
[/quote]

As mentionned, I am currently playing 710MB with the specs I mentionned and plan on keeping the same loft for my next set of irons because of the yardages and flight I get from them.

I could always order the 712MB with the same loft but the added forgiveness of the 712AP2 peeked my interest but the drawback is the added offset hence the reason of my question.

Thanks for your input.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mat905s' timestamp='1323571719' post='3922641']
[quote name='imaplus3wannaplay' timestamp='1323570317' post='3922565']
Did you mention what type of clubs you are planning to order weaker lofts on? I ask because it could also affect ball flight. Some club companies make lofts stronger but lower the COG to obtain higher flight. If you order them weak and they have a lower COG than what you are accustomed to... they may launch much higher. Just food for thought beyond the issues of offset and bounce.
[/quote]

As mentionned, I am currently playing 710MB with the specs I mentionned and plan on keeping the same loft for my next set of irons because of the yardages and flight I get from them.

I could always order the 712MB with the same loft but the added forgiveness of the 712AP2 peeked my interest but the drawback is the added offset hence the reason of my question.

Thanks for your input.
[/quote]



Unless I'm missing something you would only have to bend one club strong, and only one degree at that (like your old set). Seems extremely minor to me.

Ping G400 Max driver w/Aldila Rogue 125 Silver
Ping G425 5 wood & hybrid
Ping G30 irons w/Recoil 95

Ping G425 irons w/Accra ICWT 2.0 95
Ping Glide wedges w/Recoil 110
Ping Redwood Anser - the "real deal!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mat905s' timestamp='1323571719' post='3922641']
[quote name='imaplus3wannaplay' timestamp='1323570317' post='3922565']
Did you mention what type of clubs you are planning to order weaker lofts on? I ask because it could also affect ball flight. Some club companies make lofts stronger but lower the COG to obtain higher flight. If you order them weak and they have a lower COG than what you are accustomed to... they may launch much higher. Just food for thought beyond the issues of offset and bounce.
[/quote]

As mentionned, I am currently playing 710MB with the specs I mentionned and plan on keeping the same loft for my next set of irons because of the yardages and flight I get from them.

I could always order the 712MB with the same loft but the added forgiveness of the 712AP2 peeked my interest but the drawback is the added offset hence the reason of my question.

Thanks for your input.
[/quote]

Ok... I see your point, but going from the MBs to the AP2s is a big move in regards to COG. The COG in the AP2s are definitely lower than in the MB. Weakening the loft will decrease a little bit of the offset but the ball will likely launch higher with more spin than with your MBs. Even thought the loft of the irons would be the same, the trajectory will change due to more mass lower behind the ball. I would suggest trying the AP2s before bending them to get a good comparison in trajectory, spin , and distance before bending them. You can always bend them to your liking after the purchase. A shaft change may correct the trajectory issue as well... if you have a change in trajectory after trying them. For example: You could try a more tip stiff shaft with a higher kick to bring the flight and spin down. I don't know what shaft you're currently using, but the TT DGs are about the lowest launching iron shafts out there. There are a lot of variables to consider, but they may be minor and unnecessary. Good luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Nessism' timestamp='1323573071' post='3922743']
[quote name='Mat905s' timestamp='1323571719' post='3922641']
[quote name='imaplus3wannaplay' timestamp='1323570317' post='3922565']
Did you mention what type of clubs you are planning to order weaker lofts on? I ask because it could also affect ball flight. Some club companies make lofts stronger but lower the COG to obtain higher flight. If you order them weak and they have a lower COG than what you are accustomed to... they may launch much higher. Just food for thought beyond the issues of offset and bounce.
[/quote]

As mentionned, I am currently playing 710MB with the specs I mentionned and plan on keeping the same loft for my next set of irons because of the yardages and flight I get from them.

I could always order the 712MB with the same loft but the added forgiveness of the 712AP2 peeked my interest but the drawback is the added offset hence the reason of my question.

Thanks for your input.
[/quote]



Unless I'm missing something you would only have to bend one club strong, and only one degree at that (like your old set). Seems extremely minor to me.
[/quote]

Bending 1 degre does minimal change but the thing is that the AP2 have quite a bit more offset to start with compare to the MB... which is the only drawback...

I've been playing PX satin 7.0 in my 710MB and was going to put some C-taper X in the new heads (712 AP2 or MB) to make sure that I have similar launch and at worst, a bit less spin.

Math

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

[quote name='TomWishon' timestamp='1318259661' post='3651997']
[quote name='Reid' timestamp='1318202040' post='3649431']
I've read that bending irons stronger (loft) will create more offset - is it safe to say that the opposite will also be true? I'm thinking of ordering a set of irons 2 degrees weak to match the lofts of my MP29's, and I am curious to see if this will change the way they look at address (with respect to offset). If there will be a difference, will it be that noticeable? Any help/advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks.
[/quote]

Yes, if you weaken the lofts, the offset will be decreased. This is all because as the face "tilts back more" from increasing the loft, the bottom of the face juts outward a little more in the process, thus reducing the offset. For a 2* increase in loft, you should see the offset reduced by 1.5mm. To a golfer with a LOT of experience looking at irons and with a discerning eye, this is noticeable. Typically though, a reduction in offset doesn't usually look odd unless the leading edge starts to look like it has moved out in front of the forward part of the hosel.

TOM
[/quote]

Tom,

I would assume that for every * change in loft there would be a corresponding change in the bounce angle but the [i]total bounce change [/i]could be exacerbated by the width and grind on the sole. Is that right?

I would also guess that the change in launch would also vary, depending on the center of gravity. Is that right?

I am not a clubfitter. Is there someway to estimate the effects of changes of loft on the bounce and the launch? These days all clubs tend to have different flange widths, grinds, center of gravity. I am guessing this is trial and error, rather than an arithmetic progression throughout the set.

Any advice?

Glad to see that you and Pete Styles are working together.

Best wishes, Metrybill / New Orleans, LA

Driver Ping G425 MAX
Callaway Rogue 4 wood
Cleveland HALO 3 and 4
Titleist 2019 model T300, 5-P, 48, 53
SW/LW Titleist SM6 58*/8*
Putter  variety

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='metrybill' timestamp='1408818166' post='9993891']

I would assume that for every * change in loft there would be a corresponding change in the bounce angle but the [i]total bounce change [/i]could be exacerbated by the width and grind on the sole. Is that right?

I would also guess that the change in launch would also vary, depending on the center of gravity. Is that right?

I am not a clubfitter. Is there someway to estimate the effects of changes of loft on the bounce and the launch? These days all clubs tend to have different flange widths, grinds, center of gravity. I am guessing this is trial and error, rather than an arithmetic progression throughout the set.

Any advice?

Glad to see that you and Pete Styles are working together.

Best wishes, Metrybill / New Orleans, LA
[/quote]

Yes, for each 1* that you change loft on an iron or wedge, the bounce sole angle is changed 1* in accord - bounce increases by 1* for each 1* that you increase the loft and vice versa when you lower the loft. Effective bounce is how much the leading edge is raised up off the ground when you increase the bounce sole angle or how much it is lowered when you lower the bounce sole angle. it is tied to the sole width, so when you change loft on the same head model, the effective bounce just is factored in with the bounce angle change when you change the loft. So it is in effect a constant in all this for the same head model.

Launch angle changes by different increments per each change in loft for each different iron head. For example, with a 27* #5 iron, when you change loft, for each 1* change in the loft of that 5 iron, the launch angle changes by 0.55*. So if you lower the loft from 27* to 26*, the launch angle lowers by 0.55* and if you increase loft from 27* to 28*, the launchy angle increases by 0.55*.

But then on a 9 iron for example, with a 43" #9 iron, for each 1* change in the loft of that 9 iron, the launch angle changes by 0.35*. So if you lower the loft from 43* to 42*, the launch angle lowers by 0.35* and if you increase loft from 43* to 44*, the launch angle increases by 0.35*.

Of course if you change loft on any iron by way more than 1*, then this launch angle change begins to slide in progression with the amount of loft change.

As to the CG effect, that is going to be really slight because the increment of CG change for each degree of loft change is miniscule. Yes, here again if you change the loft by a whole lot, such as say 4*, then the CG change is going to be greater. But you really would have a hard time separating what change in the launch angle and shot height is coming from the degree change in loft vs what is coming separately from the CG change. That would be a massively complex situation to try to calculate and separate out.

Bottom line is the loft change is always much greater in its effect on launch angle and shot shape than any CG change that would come along with the loft change. So we forget about the CG change when we change loft and just key into what the loft change does to the launch angle and shot shape and leave it at that.

In short, to think about the effect of a CG change when you change loft is overkill and something to just let go of when you think about shot results.

TOM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mat905s' timestamp='1323612524' post='3923573']


Bending 1 degre does minimal change but the thing is that the AP2 have quite a bit more offset to start with compare to the MB... which is the only drawback...

I've been playing PX satin 7.0 in my 710MB and was going to put some C-taper X in the new heads (712 AP2 or MB) to make sure that I have similar launch and at worst, a bit less spin.

Math
[/quote]

If you're looking for a forged cavity that has very low offset, you should look into the Wishon 575. Sounds like exactly what you're looking for. This set has constant low offset all the way through the 3i. Very unique in this regard, because most sets have progressive offset into the longer irons

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

[quote name='TomWishon' timestamp='1408977473' post='10002633']
[quote name='metrybill' timestamp='1408818166' post='9993891']
I would assume that for every * change in loft there would be a corresponding change in the bounce angle but the [i]total bounce change [/i]could be exacerbated by the width and grind on the sole. Is that right?

I would also guess that the change in launch would also vary, depending on the center of gravity. Is that right?

I am not a clubfitter. Is there someway to estimate the effects of changes of loft on the bounce and the launch? These days all clubs tend to have different flange widths, grinds, center of gravity. I am guessing this is trial and error, rather than an arithmetic progression throughout the set.

Any advice?

Glad to see that you and Pete Styles are working together.

Best wishes, Metrybill / New Orleans, LA
[/quote]

Yes, for each 1* that you change loft on an iron or wedge, the bounce sole angle is changed 1* in accord - bounce increases by 1* for each 1* that you increase the loft and vice versa when you lower the loft. Effective bounce is how much the leading edge is raised up off the ground when you increase the bounce sole angle or how much it is lowered when you lower the bounce sole angle. it is tied to the sole width, so when you change loft on the same head model, the effective bounce just is factored in with the bounce angle change when you change the loft. So it is in effect a constant in all this for the same head model.

Launch angle changes by different increments per each change in loft for each different iron head. For example, with a 27* #5 iron, when you change loft, for each 1* change in the loft of that 5 iron, the launch angle changes by 0.55*. So if you lower the loft from 27* to 26*, the launch angle lowers by 0.55* and if you increase loft from 27* to 28*, the launchy angle increases by 0.55*.

But then on a 9 iron for example, with a 43" #9 iron, for each 1* change in the loft of that 9 iron, the launch angle changes by 0.35*. So if you lower the loft from 43* to 42*, the launch angle lowers by 0.35* and if you increase loft from 43* to 44*, the launch angle increases by 0.35*.

Of course if you change loft on any iron by way more than 1*, then this launch angle change begins to slide in progression with the amount of loft change.

As to the CG effect, that is going to be really slight because the increment of CG change for each degree of loft change is miniscule. Yes, here again if you change the loft by a whole lot, such as say 4*, then the CG change is going to be greater. But you really would have a hard time separating what change in the launch angle and shot height is coming from the degree change in loft vs what is coming separately from the CG change. That would be a massively complex situation to try to calculate and separate out.

Bottom line is the loft change is always much greater in its effect on launch angle and shot shape than any CG change that would come along with the loft change. So we forget about the CG change when we change loft and just key into what the loft change does to the launch angle and shot shape and leave it at that.

In short, to think about the effect of a CG change when you change loft is overkill and something to just let go of when you think about shot results.

TOM
[/quote]
Thanks, Mr. Wishon. Very informative. This and your earlier explanation of the effect of loft change on offset have told me everything I would like to know on the subject.

metrybill

Cwebb, thanks to you, too. I will look at those Wishon 575 irons.

Any thoughts on how much offset improves ball first contact for those who tend to hit the "fats" because of lack of practice?

Driver Ping G425 MAX
Callaway Rogue 4 wood
Cleveland HALO 3 and 4
Titleist 2019 model T300, 5-P, 48, 53
SW/LW Titleist SM6 58*/8*
Putter  variety

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Reid' timestamp='1318202040' post='3649431']
I've read that bending irons stronger (loft) will create more offset - is it safe to say that the opposite will also be true? I'm thinking of ordering a set of irons 2 degrees weak to match the lofts of my MP29's, and I am curious to see if this will change the way they look at address (with respect to offset). If there will be a difference, will it be that noticeable? Any help/advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks.
[/quote]

adds bounce

M1 460//Kuro Kage Silver TiNi 6x
SLDR 3w//GDDI 7x
M1 3Hybrid//Kuro Kage 8x
Mizuno MP-4(7-PW), MP-15(4-6)//C-TaperX

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Discussion and links to Photos
      Please put any questions or Comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Monday #1
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Monday #2
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #1
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #2
      2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Tuesday #3
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Thorbjorn Olesen - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Ben Silverman - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jesse Droemer - SoTX PGA Section POY - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      David Lipsky - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Martin Trainer - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Zac Blair - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jacob Bridgeman - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Trace Crowe - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Jimmy Walker - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Daniel Berger - WITB(very mini) - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Chesson Hadley - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Callum McNeill - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Rhein Gibson - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Patrick Fishburn - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Peter Malnati - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Raul Pereda - WITB - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Gary Woodland WITB (New driver, iron shafts) – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Padraig Harrington WITB – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      Tom Hoge's custom Cameron - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Piretti putters - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Ping putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Kevin Dougherty's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Bettinardi putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Cameron putter - 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Erik Barnes testing an all-black Axis1 putter – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
      Tony Finau's new driver shaft – 2024 Texas Children's Houston Open
       
       
       
       
       
      • 7 replies
    • 2024 Valspar Championship WITB Photos (Thanks to bvmagic)- Discussion & Links to Photos
      This weeks WITB Pics are from member bvmagic (Brian). Brian's first event for WRX was in 2008 at Bayhill while in college. Thanks so much bv.
       
      Please put your comments or question on this thread. Links to all the threads are below...
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 31 replies
    • 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Monday #3
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Matt (LFG) Every - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Sahith Theegala - WITB - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Cameron putters (and new "LD" grip) - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Bettinardi MB & CB irons - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Bettinardi API putter cover - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      Custom Swag API covers - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
      New Golf Pride Reverse Taper grips - 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 15 replies
    • 2024 Cognizant Classic - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #1
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #2
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #3
      2024 Cognizant Classic - Monday #4
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Brandt Snedeker - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Max Greyserman - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Eric Cole - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Carl Yuan - WITb - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Russell Henley - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Justin Sun - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alex Noren - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Shane Lowry - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Taylor Montgomery - WITB - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jake Knapp (KnappTime_ltd) - WITB - - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Super Stoke Pistol Lock 1.0 & 2.0 grips - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      LA Golf new insert putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Garsen Quad Tour 15 grip - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      New Swag covers - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Jacob Bridgeman's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Bud Cauley's custom Cameron putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Ryo Hisatsune's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Chris Kirk - new black Callaway Apex CB irons and a few Odyssey putters - 2024 Cognizant Classic
      Alejandro Tosti's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Cognizant Classic
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 2 replies
    • 2024 Genesis Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Monday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #1
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #2
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #3
      2024 Genesis Invitational - Tuesday #4
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Rory McIlroy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Sepp Straka - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Patrick Rodgers - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Brendon Todd - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Denny McCarthy - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Corey Conners - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Chase Johnson - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tommy Fleetwood - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Matt Fitzpatrick - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Si Woo Kim - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Viktor Hovland - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Wyndham Clark - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Cam Davis - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Nick Taylor - WITB - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Ben Baller WITB update (New putter, driver, hybrid and shafts) – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      New Vortex Golf rangefinder - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Fujikura Ventus shaft - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods & TaylorMade "Sun Day Red" apparel launch event, product photos – 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods Sun Day Red golf shoes - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Aretera shafts - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      New Toulon putters - 2024 Genesis Invitational
      Tiger Woods' new white "Sun Day Red" golf shoe prototypes – 2024 Genesis Invitational
       
       
       
       
       
      • 22 replies

×
×
  • Create New...