Cleveland RTX6 versus RTX Full Face II?

RobDMB · April 10

Has anyone compared these yet? Specifically for a sand and lob wedge? I had previously played RTX3 in mid-bounce and after trying other wedges looking to come back to Cleveland. I'd probably go mid-bounce again but not sure how the bounce on the Full Face II compares. Any thoughts are appreciated. Thanks!

wam78 · April 10

No comparison between the 2, but I had Zipcore and the full face wedges last year. The full face was outstanding! Loved the sole for both short sided bunker/chips and full shots. Super easy to flight low and drive shots into tucked pins. Can’t imagine the new ones are drastically different.

mjo23 · April 10

They should play quite similar in terms of bounce. If i remember correctly, I believe there was a video put out by Cleveland saying that it plays like it has more bounce than what’s measured (at least for the first full face). And In the ‘tour rack’ version there’s a custom option to have a rounded leading edge, which will reduce digging for those with a steeper AoA or play in softer conditions.

I think it mostly comes down to whether you like the look of the full-face. It provides extra confidence to some people, particularly when opening the face, and might look strange/too-different for others

Edited April 10 by mjo23

Rearviewmirror · April 10

I had this exact question! I got the low-bounce 58 and my course is too wet for it to be effective from anything other than baked hard pan lies, I may investigate the full face 2 or new Ping wedges...