Replace my Adams CMBs PLEASE!!

[B-wall]

Owned the CMBs for 5 years. They are still one of may all time favorite clubs. The closest that I could find to looks, feel, weight, and flight were the Srixon Z745s.

[2putttom]

> @"P3 Sweden" said:

> Still gaming the CMB:s...

> Tried a Srixon 765/965 combo for a while, but the CMB keeps winning.

> Don't really know what to try next?

 

I still have mine as a back up set.

[Noke]

CMB to TMB? Only one letter different.

 

Seriously, though, why not go with a similarly sized iron as the CMB with tungsten, like the Adams was?

[Terry Gold]

'A hoe gotta hoe' is also well-suited as the introductory lament for a CHUMP.

Pathetic really. Any empathy consistent with the historically 'disenfranchised' plays well with ease and minimal tease.

The bad look is equating conspicuous consumption, celebrating it before/after the point of purchase, as if a bluster boast of 'I can afford this' mini-parades and staged interval mingling make just enough of a point to justify it, which was correct.

[thlongball]

I'm on the same journey but I think I'm close to ready to stop trying, just too good for me.

[dmeeksDC]

> @Lemonde said:

> I just switched this week to the p770's. Way more forgiving and with c taper lites to replace c taper 120s.

This ^. I gamed the CMB’s and it is truly a great iron. It is a compact head, though, and while I would agree the 745 is pretty close, it seems to my eye to be a longer blade. If you are used to the CMB shape, you may be sensitive to a “longer”’ look. Going totally off memory, the clubs that may look the most similar IMO would be the TM 770 and also the 760, which also would most likely be more forgiving. You may very well be best off to get another set of the CMB’s, but those are two heads I would give a test run.