Jump to content
2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson WITB Photos ×

Odd quirk in posting partial scores


Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, nsxguy said:

My first thought would be, the "default" value for each hole would be based on the player's 'cap. 9 would default to PAR, but 10-27 would default to BOGEY. 27 or higher to DOUBLE BOGEY - you know, most likely/common single hole score. <-- now THAT would be good design,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, IMO of course.

I suppose that if the goal was to make it harder to screw up, the default value would be the dash, and any score the player entered would be intentionally entered.  Or simply eliminate the horizontal scroll of possible values, and require that an actual number button be pushed, which would make score entry the same, whether stats were also being entered or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, davep043 said:

I suppose that if the goal was to make it harder to screw up, the default value would be the dash, and any score the player entered would be intentionally entered.  Or simply eliminate the horizontal scroll of possible values, and require that an actual number button be pushed, which would make score entry the same, whether stats were also being entered or not.

 

As best as I can determine, if you enter NOTHING on the web interface (with or without stats) you get a hole not played. If you enter NOTHING on the Android interface without stats you get a hole not played. If you enter NOTHING on the Android interface with stats you get a gross par. Additionally, the indication of a hole not played (when entering scores with stats) is different when entering with stats (vs no stats) on Android (and I assume IOS). The indication of a hole not played on Android with stats is not even a legal (or even possible) entry on the Web interface (with or without stats) or the Android interface without stats. 

 

This is something that should never have passed the design review step (if there was one). 

 

dave

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DaveLeeNC said:

As best as I can determine, if you enter NOTHING on the web interface (with or without stats) you get a hole not played. If you enter NOTHING on the Android interface without stats you get a hole not played. If you enter NOTHING on the Android interface with stats you get a gross par.

I also use Android.  If you enter Post Score after entering 10 to 17 holes (without stats), holes without a score are treated as Not Played, just as you say.  The same happens if you enter Post Score (with stats) after entering only 10 to 17 holes.  The "problem" happens when the Player hits Next Hole (with stats) for holes not played, essentially accepting the default of gross par. Like I suggest, one solution is to make Not Played the default (with stats), or to simply require a numerical score to be entered instead of using the "slider with default".   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, DaveLeeNC said:

 

As best as I can determine, if you enter NOTHING on the web interface (with or without stats) you get a hole not played. If you enter NOTHING on the Android interface without stats you get a hole not played. If you enter NOTHING on the Android interface with stats you get a gross par. Additionally, the indication of a hole not played (when entering scores with stats) is different when entering with stats (vs no stats) on Android (and I assume IOS). The indication of a hole not played on Android with stats is not even a legal (or even possible) entry on the Web interface (with or without stats) or the Android interface without stats. 

 

This is something that should never have passed the design review step (if there was one). 

 

dave

 

Hey dave, as I'm sure you realize, the lack of real estate on the phone app is (mostly) the reason why they work differently.

 

Still doesn't excuse the phone app not having a "help screen" and/or recognizing the player logging onto the app has not ever, or doesn't commonly, post 10-17 score rounds - which is everyone since this is very new. Too easy to make a mistake and not intuitive enough.

 

This is a new system and I daresay most golfers don't skip holes. Upon clicking on the "10-17 hole" button, then "Enter Hole-by-hole Scores", the next page, before entering a single score, should have a brief pop-up message on how to enter the partial round score.

 

For PLAIN HBH, the numeric keypad is likely enough, as I would think most would understand to simply leave the box empty for a skipped hole. But a help pop-up saying something like "Use numeric keypad to enter each hole's score. For skipped holes, just leave the box empty and click into the next hole played.". You could also add a "Do not show again" checkbox for those who might do this fairly often and, after understanding the process, would rather not see the message again.

 

For STATS HBH, a similar pop-up message, something like "If the highlighted score is the score for that hole, simply enter the stats and click "Next hole". Otherwise scroll to the score made, click on it, proceed to the stats, the "Next Hole". If the hole was skipped, click on the long dash (-) to the LEFT end of the scores scroll line, then click "Next hole"". As above you could also have a checkbox "Do not show again".

 

There should also be a help box, similar to the circled "i" to the right of Total Adj Score" (HBH), or Total Score" (HBHWS) so if the user forgets what to do he can pop up the help message again - easy peasy.

 

I didn't go any further because, unlike davep (I believe), I have no easy way of deleting a round I enter in experimenting with this - even though he says there are ways to cancel out before (really) entering the round into GHIN.

 

Anyhow, once the user gets used to it, I suppose it's pretty easy.

 

 

 

 

 

Callaway Epic Flash SZ 9.0 Ventus Blue 6S

Ping G425 14.5 Fairway Tour AD TP 6X

Ping G425 MAX 20.5 7 wood Diamana Blue 70 S

Titleist 716 AP-1  5-PW, DGS300

Ping Glide Forged, 48, DGS300

Taylormade MG3 52*, 56*, TW 60* DGS200

LAB Mezz Max 34*, RED, BGT Stability

Titleist Pro V1X

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@nsxguy If I were the King of Golf, I would (for the cases of with and without stats across all the platforms)

 

  • Make the indication of an unplayed hole consistent (a dash seems good enough to me)
  • Require a positive entry (requiring that the user input something into the score field) in all cases (no entry would not be acceptable) 
  • If the users feel that a default is important for efficiency, then net par would seem to be the best answer here. Or better still default to requiring an entry in all cases but have a user defined setting that allows the user to define his/her default entry. 

 

But I suspect that my reign as King of Golf would be short 😁

 

dave 

Edited by DaveLeeNC
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, DaveLeeNC said:

@nsxguy If I were the King of Golf, I would (for the cases of with and without stats across all the platforms)

 

  • Make the indication of an unplayed hole consistent (a dash seems good enough to me)
  • Require a positive entry (requiring that the user input something into the score field) in all cases (no entry would not be acceptable) 
  • If the users feel that a default is important for efficiency, then net par would seem to be the best answer here. Or better still default to requiring an entry in all cases but have a user defined setting that allows the user to define his/her default entry. 

 

But I suspect that my reign as King of Golf would be short 😁

 

dave 

 

The/A problem is, in these times, where "time is money" and nobody has enough time to get things done, most people want convenience; i.e. "Get it done and move on".

 

"More clicks ? I have to press more buttons ?" :classic_laugh:

 

I haven't done a deep dive into the phone app simply because a) it's not my job, and b) I don't use it.

 

But curiosity, and discussion, sometimes gets the better of me. So, after fiddling around with it a little, I guess my main objections are, a) I don't see it as all that intuitive and b) I don't see any small "help" button - it wouldn't take much.

 

My guess would be that most players using GHIN enter their rounds the same way round after round.

 

So, with a relatively short learning curve, it becomes routine and little thought required. Easy peasy. The 10-17 scenario is a little different & the hole skip feature is a bit confusing, but again, with a little familiarity, no biggie.

 

And, if I'm reading davep's posts correctly, if a  player stopped after 10, and before 18's completed, one doesn't even need the "skip" feature. Just hit "Post Score" after entering the last hole played.

 

I mean how often does someone play 10-17 and skip say, hole 12 ? :classic_blink:

 

And a golfer can keep scoring/stats "real-time". Personally, *I* don't have my phone out during the round - but a lot of players do. :classic_wink:

  • Like 2

Callaway Epic Flash SZ 9.0 Ventus Blue 6S

Ping G425 14.5 Fairway Tour AD TP 6X

Ping G425 MAX 20.5 7 wood Diamana Blue 70 S

Titleist 716 AP-1  5-PW, DGS300

Ping Glide Forged, 48, DGS300

Taylormade MG3 52*, 56*, TW 60* DGS200

LAB Mezz Max 34*, RED, BGT Stability

Titleist Pro V1X

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 2/23/2024 at 8:14 AM, bluedot said:

This gets a bit into the weeds, but here goes.  We've been playing less than 18 holes most days at my club since early November because of a bunker renovation project, and since mid-January when the old "net par" method for holes not played went away, we've been posting hole-by-hole scores.

 

When you post a partial round of more than 9 holes, you are now supposed to select "10-17" for the number of holes played, then enter the hole-by-hole scores, skipping the holes not played.  At the end of that when you select post, the GHIN app will "remind" you that you have not entered scores for all holes and ask if you want to post anyway.  When you post, you then see that total of strokes taken on the holes that you DID play, with the number of holes in parentheses, but also an 18 hole differential.

 

All well and good, EXCEPT that one of my regular partners told me that he also posts stats, and when he does, the GHIN app not only gives him a score as if he had played all 18 holes, plus a differential but he can see that "scores" for the holes he did NOT play, and that they are NOT net par.  He also said that there seems to be no connection to how well or how poorly he was playing that day.

 

So yesterday, with the approval of my head pro, I double entered my score.  I posted both rounds hole-by-hole, but one with and one without stats.  We played 16 holes, with the 2nd and 3rd holes closed; 3 is a par 5 and the #1 handicap hole, so a stroke hole for me.  Here's what happened:

 

Without stats:  GHIN posted "69 (16) 6.8", denoting the actual strokes taken on 16 hole, and a projected 18 hole differential

 

With stats:  GHIN posted "77"  with a differential of 6.2.  When I selected "View Scorecard", GHIN had given me par on both #2 and #3, despite #3 being the #1 handicap hole on the golf course. 

 

FWIW, we deleted the higher of the two, so only the 6.2 goes into calculating my index.

 

Obviously, the difference in the differentials is the puzzling part.  While it is unlikely that 0.6 on one score will matter, and in a couple of weeks the bunker project will be complete and we'll go back to playing 18 holes.  But it's odd, to say the least, and when my head pro called the state association, they couldn't explain it either.  So perhaps just a glitch?

 


Having played a 16 hole round today, it now occurs to me, what good are the stats that your friend was posting?  The number of putts, GIR, etc are all meaningless because of the irregular number of holes.  At least the way I see it.

 

Just wondering.  

M4 Driver
4, 7, 9 woods

5, 6 Adams hybrids
7-GW Maltby irons
54 & 58º Wedges
LAB Mezz.1 box stock
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ChaosTheory said:

We have 2 holes closed today.  We use Golf Genius for score posting.  I’m going to be interested to see how it handles this.

1. If you post without stats, simply select hole-by-hole, then 10-17, then enter the hole by hole scores, skipping the holes that were closed.  You’ll be asked if you want to post anyway, which you do, and you’ll then see your actual strokes taken for the 16 holes you played, but with an 18 hole differential.

 

2. The process is slightly different for hole-by-hole with stats; GHIN defaults to par for each hole, and you change it accordingly.  But for the holes skipped, you have to slide the score line to the right until you see a dash instead of a number, and select the dash.  
 

5 minutes ago, ChaosTheory said:


Having played a 16 hole round today, it now occurs to me, what good are the stats that your friend was posting?  The number of putts, GIR, etc are all meaningless because of the irregular number of holes.  At least the way I see it.

 

Just wondering.  

I don’t know how he uses the stats from partial rounds; I don’t post that way, but he’s a smart guy and I assume he has a method. 
 

And knowing that you hit 12 of 16 greens still gives you a percentage, as does fairways, as well putts per GIR.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • 2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson - Monday #1
      2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson - Monday #2
      2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson - Tuesday #1
      2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson - Tuesday #2
      2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson - Tuesday #3
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Pierceson Coody - WITB - 2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson
      Kris Kim - WITB - 2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson
      David Nyfjall - WITB - 2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson
      Adrien Dumont de Chassart - WITB - 2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson
      Jarred Jetter - North Texas PGA Section Champ - WITB - 2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson
      Richy Werenski - WITB - 2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson
      Wesley Bryan - WITB - 2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson
      Parker Coody - WITB - 2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson
      Peter Kuest - WITB - 2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson
      Blaine Hale, Jr. - WITB - 2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson
      Kelly Kraft - WITB - 2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson
      Rico Hoey - WITB - 2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      Adam Scott's 2 new custom L.A.B. Golf putters - 2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson
      Scotty Cameron putters - 2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Haha
        • Like
      • 10 replies
    • 2024 Zurich Classic - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Zurich Classic - Monday #1
      2024 Zurich Classic - Monday #2
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Alex Fitzpatrick - WITB - 2024 Zurich Classic
      Austin Cook - WITB - 2024 Zurich Classic
      Alejandro Tosti - WITB - 2024 Zurich Classic
      Davis Riley - WITB - 2024 Zurich Classic
      MJ Daffue - WITB - 2024 Zurich Classic
      Nate Lashley - WITB - 2024 Zurich Classic
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      MJ Daffue's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Zurich Classic
      Cameron putters - 2024 Zurich Classic
      Swag covers ( a few custom for Nick Hardy) - 2024 Zurich Classic
      Custom Bettinardi covers for Matt and Alex Fitzpatrick - 2024 Zurich Classic
       
       
       
      • 1 reply
    • 2024 RBC Heritage - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 RBC Heritage - Monday #1
      2024 RBC Heritage - Monday #2
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Justin Thomas - WITB - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Justin Rose - WITB - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Chandler Phillips - WITB - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Nick Dunlap - WITB - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Thomas Detry - WITB - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Austin Eckroat - WITB - 2024 RBC Heritage
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      Wyndham Clark's Odyssey putter - 2024 RBC Heritage
      JT's new Cameron putter - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Justin Thomas testing new Titleist 2 wood - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Cameron putters - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Odyssey putter with triple track alignment aid - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Scotty Cameron The Blk Box putting alignment aid/training aid - 2024 RBC Heritage
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 7 replies
    • 2024 Masters - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Huge shoutout to our member Stinger2irons for taking and posting photos from Augusta
       
       
      Tuesday
       
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 1
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 2
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 3
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 4
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 5
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 6
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 7
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 8
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 9
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 10
       
       
       
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 14 replies
    • Rory McIlroy testing a new TaylorMade "PROTO" 4-iron – 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Rory McIlroy testing a new TaylorMade "PROTO" 4-iron – 2024 Valero Texas Open
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 93 replies

×
×
  • Create New...