(NO BUY/SELL/TRADE POSTS) Air Jordan GOLF footwear - AJ12 Low G Cherry - 12/13/22

[GoGoErky]

> @jay_dwight said:

> > @GoGoErky said:

> > > @Shades234 said:

> > > I copped a pair of the white/gum 11's but I'm not really seeing any actual profit to be made from reselling. If I go on StockX, the lowest bid/ask prices don't leave any actual profit margin after fees. Has Nike been increasing quantity of release to combat resellers? Or does it take a while for the value to rise?

> > >

> > > I have no plans of reselling mine, but I am curious about what there is to actually be gained.

> >

> > It’s not an og colorway. Look at the bred or Concorde on there

> No way they haven’t increased supply- look at 11 Whites and Concords which were super popular selling for $250-$350 compared to 6’s or 1’s which people were divided over selling for $600-$900.

>

> It’s supply and demand.

 

I’m not saying there isn’t a chance that inventory is up but the reality is certain colors get more on the secondary market than others.

[jay_dwight]

> @GoGoErky said:

> > @jay_dwight said:

> > > @GoGoErky said:

> > > > @Shades234 said:

> > > > I copped a pair of the white/gum 11's but I'm not really seeing any actual profit to be made from reselling. If I go on StockX, the lowest bid/ask prices don't leave any actual profit margin after fees. Has Nike been increasing quantity of release to combat resellers? Or does it take a while for the value to rise?

> > > >

> > > > I have no plans of reselling mine, but I am curious about what there is to actually be gained.

> > >

> > > It’s not an og colorway. Look at the bred or Concorde on there

> > No way they haven’t increased supply- look at 11 Whites and Concords which were super popular selling for $250-$350 compared to 6’s or 1’s which people were divided over selling for $600-$900.

> >

> > It’s supply and demand.

>

> I’m not saying there isn’t a chance that inventory is up but the reality is certain colors get more on the secondary market than others.

 

Absolutely that’s true.

 

[Shades234]

> @jay_dwight said:

> > @GoGoErky said:

> > > @Shades234 said:

> > > I copped a pair of the white/gum 11's but I'm not really seeing any actual profit to be made from reselling. If I go on StockX, the lowest bid/ask prices don't leave any actual profit margin after fees. Has Nike been increasing quantity of release to combat resellers? Or does it take a while for the value to rise?

> > >

> > > I have no plans of reselling mine, but I am curious about what there is to actually be gained.

> >

> > It’s not an og colorway. Look at the bred or Concorde on there

> No way they haven’t increased supply- look at 11 Whites and Concords which were super popular selling for $250-$350 compared to 6’s or 1’s which people were divided over selling for $600-$900.

>

> It’s supply and demand.

 

That's what I was thinking. There were Jordans a year or 2 back that were doubling in price instantly on EBay or StockX. Seems like Nike have started making enough shoes where there isn't profit to be made from them after paying fees. So that should be good for the ecosystem right? Resellers can't profit as easily and Nike still gets to sell out of their stock nearly instantly for "scarcity".

[GoGoErky]

> @Shades234 said:

> > @jay_dwight said:

> > > @GoGoErky said:

> > > > @Shades234 said:

> > > > I copped a pair of the white/gum 11's but I'm not really seeing any actual profit to be made from reselling. If I go on StockX, the lowest bid/ask prices don't leave any actual profit margin after fees. Has Nike been increasing quantity of release to combat resellers? Or does it take a while for the value to rise?

> > > >

> > > > I have no plans of reselling mine, but I am curious about what there is to actually be gained.

> > >

> > > It’s not an og colorway. Look at the bred or Concorde on there

> > No way they haven’t increased supply- look at 11 Whites and Concords which were super popular selling for $250-$350 compared to 6’s or 1’s which people were divided over selling for $600-$900.

> >

> > It’s supply and demand.

>

> That's what I was thinking. There were Jordans a year or 2 back that were doubling in price instantly on EBay or StockX. Seems like Nike have started making enough shoes where there isn't profit to be made from them after paying fees. So that should be good for the ecosystem right? Resellers can't profit as easily and Nike still gets to sell out of their stock nearly instantly for "scarcity".

 

The no denim have plenty of room for profit as do the Breds and concords. It’s the same on the sneaker side. Certain colors in the 1s will command higher prices over others. 11s, 3s usually do as well. It’s hit or miss on the other numbers

 

[Augster]

> @GoGoErky said:

> > @Shades234 said:

> > > @jay_dwight said:

> > > > @GoGoErky said:

> > > > > @Shades234 said:

> > > > > I copped a pair of the white/gum 11's but I'm not really seeing any actual profit to be made from reselling. If I go on StockX, the lowest bid/ask prices don't leave any actual profit margin after fees. Has Nike been increasing quantity of release to combat resellers? Or does it take a while for the value to rise?

> > > > >

> > > > > I have no plans of reselling mine, but I am curious about what there is to actually be gained.

> > > >

> > > > It’s not an og colorway. Look at the bred or Concorde on there

> > > No way they haven’t increased supply- look at 11 Whites and Concords which were super popular selling for $250-$350 compared to 6’s or 1’s which people were divided over selling for $600-$900.

> > >

> > > It’s supply and demand.

> >

> > That's what I was thinking. There were Jordans a year or 2 back that were doubling in price instantly on EBay or StockX. Seems like Nike have started making enough shoes where there isn't profit to be made from them after paying fees. So that should be good for the ecosystem right? Resellers can't profit as easily and Nike still gets to sell out of their stock nearly instantly for "scarcity".

>

> The no denim have plenty of room for profit as do the Breds and concords. It’s the same on the sneaker side. Certain colors in the 1s will command higher prices over others. 11s, 3s usually do as well. It’s hit or miss on the other numbers

>

 

11’s and 3’s will always have a market. The less OG the colorway, the less the shoe will fetch, generally. That said, the 11 denims were a double-up flip. My concords I wore 7 times and sold for $100 profit. Good colorways.

 

Look at the J3 browns. No market for them. Ugly shoes. A year and a half after release and, after fees, you’ll be lucky to get back your sale price.

 

Space Jam 11’s golf shoes will be the next big release.

 

Lastly, not to be a conspiracy theorist or anything, but one of the biggest “resellers” is Nike. They release “X” amount to the public at, say $200, then start putting them up on StockX and eBay etc. for $400+. They won’t “sell out” on NDC if they sell them for $450. But they can sell, say, 10,000 of them in the first minute for $200 then another, say, 1000 pairs on StockX at $400+. When they don’t sell out on StockX and they are ready to move on from that release, they take those “held back” pairs and do a “restock” and sell them out, again, at retail. This is win-win for them. Sell a bunch of pairs at retail to make profit and cover all costs. Then sell fewer pairs at a huge markup to the customers that can afford it, then when that market slows down, release the rest at retail for more profit.

 

Gotta love the shoe game.

 

[Rfern12]

Delete

[tharpst]

This times 1000!!! I’m a big sneaker head, flip shoes a lot to be able to afford the ones I want. I always tell my buddies that Nike has to do this and they don’t believe me. Last Saturday, I ended up with two pairs of satin black toe in size 10.5. Bought them for $160, sold one pair for $1110 and one pair for $1133 on stockx. Nike would be crazy not to

do this... he!!, think of it this way - if they keep 1000 pairs for secondary market resale, that’s $1,100,000 resale instead of of $160,000 retail.

 

> @Augster said:

> > @GoGoErky said:

> > > @Shades234 said:

> > > > @jay_dwight said:

> > > > > @GoGoErky said:

> > > > > > @Shades234 said:

> > > > > > I copped a pair of the white/gum 11's but I'm not really seeing any actual profit to be made from reselling. If I go on StockX, the lowest bid/ask prices don't leave any actual profit margin after fees. Has Nike been increasing quantity of release to combat resellers? Or does it take a while for the value to rise?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I have no plans of reselling mine, but I am curious about what there is to actually be gained.

> > > > >

> > > > > It’s not an og colorway. Look at the bred or Concorde on there

> > > > No way they haven’t increased supply- look at 11 Whites and Concords which were super popular selling for $250-$350 compared to 6’s or 1’s which people were divided over selling for $600-$900.

> > > >

> > > > It’s supply and demand.

> > >

> > > That's what I was thinking. There were Jordans a year or 2 back that were doubling in price instantly on EBay or StockX. Seems like Nike have started making enough shoes where there isn't profit to be made from them after paying fees. So that should be good for the ecosystem right? Resellers can't profit as easily and Nike still gets to sell out of their stock nearly instantly for "scarcity".

> >

> > The no denim have plenty of room for profit as do the Breds and concords. It’s the same on the sneaker side. Certain colors in the 1s will command higher prices over others. 11s, 3s usually do as well. It’s hit or miss on the other numbers

> >

>

> 11’s and 3’s will always have a market. The less OG the colorway, the less the shoe will fetch, generally. That said, the 11 denims were a double-up flip. My concords I wore 7 times and sold for $100 profit. Good colorways.

>

> Look at the J3 browns. No market for them. Ugly shoes. A year and a half after release and, after fees, you’ll be lucky to get back your sale price.

>

> Space Jam 11’s golf shoes will be the next big release.

>

> Lastly, not to be a conspiracy theorist or anything, but one of the biggest “resellers” is Nike. They release “X” amount to the public at, say $200, then start putting them up on StockX and eBay etc. for $400+. They won’t “sell out” on NDC if they sell them for $450. But they can sell, say, 10,000 of them in the first minute for $200 then another, say, 1000 pairs on StockX at $400+. When they don’t sell out on StockX and they are ready to move on from that release, they take those “held back” pairs and do a “restock” and sell them out, again, at retail. This is win-win for them. Sell a bunch of pairs at retail to make profit and cover all costs. Then sell fewer pairs at a huge markup to the customers that can afford it, then when that market slows down, release the rest at retail for more profit.

>

> Gotta love the shoe game.

>

 

 

[FaReal87]

> @Augster said:

> > @GoGoErky said:

> > > @Shades234 said:

> > > > @jay_dwight said:

> > > > > @GoGoErky said:

> > > > > > @Shades234 said:

> > > > > > I copped a pair of the white/gum 11's but I'm not really seeing any actual profit to be made from reselling. If I go on StockX, the lowest bid/ask prices don't leave any actual profit margin after fees. Has Nike been increasing quantity of release to combat resellers? Or does it take a while for the value to rise?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I have no plans of reselling mine, but I am curious about what there is to actually be gained.

> > > > >

> > > > > It’s not an og colorway. Look at the bred or Concorde on there

> > > > No way they haven’t increased supply- look at 11 Whites and Concords which were super popular selling for $250-$350 compared to 6’s or 1’s which people were divided over selling for $600-$900.

> > > >

> > > > It’s supply and demand.

> > >

> > > That's what I was thinking. There were Jordans a year or 2 back that were doubling in price instantly on EBay or StockX. Seems like Nike have started making enough shoes where there isn't profit to be made from them after paying fees. So that should be good for the ecosystem right? Resellers can't profit as easily and Nike still gets to sell out of their stock nearly instantly for "scarcity".

> >

> > The no denim have plenty of room for profit as do the Breds and concords. It’s the same on the sneaker side. Certain colors in the 1s will command higher prices over others. 11s, 3s usually do as well. It’s hit or miss on the other numbers

> >

>

> 11’s and 3’s will always have a market. The less OG the colorway, the less the shoe will fetch, generally. That said, the 11 denims were a double-up flip. My concords I wore 7 times and sold for $100 profit. Good colorways.

>

> Look at the J3 browns. No market for them. Ugly shoes. A year and a half after release and, after fees, you’ll be lucky to get back your sale price.

>

> Space Jam 11’s golf shoes will be the next big release.

>

> Lastly, not to be a conspiracy theorist or anything, but one of the biggest “resellers” is Nike. They release “X” amount to the public at, say $200, then start putting them up on StockX and eBay etc. for $400+. They won’t “sell out” on NDC if they sell them for $450. But they can sell, say, 10,000 of them in the first minute for $200 then another, say, 1000 pairs on StockX at $400+. When they don’t sell out on StockX and they are ready to move on from that release, they take those “held back” pairs and do a “restock” and sell them out, again, at retail. This is win-win for them. Sell a bunch of pairs at retail to make profit and cover all costs. Then sell fewer pairs at a huge markup to the customers that can afford it, then when that market slows down, release the rest at retail for more profit.

>

> Gotta love the shoe game.

>

 

Link to the report on Nike doing this please

[tharpst]

I wish there was definitive evidence but I can’t actually prove it. I just think it’s strange that some of their biggest releases also have really high resale numbers on stockx and eBay. I get it for the profit, but don’t get where the actual inventory comes

From. Lets look at last weeks satin Black toe - Super super limited releases sold out immediately, but there have been over 3000 resold on stockx alone. How do they sell out in 5 seconds but then there are that many pairs flooded onto the secondary market?

[FaReal87]

> @tharpst said:

> I wish there was definitive evidence but I can’t actually prove it. I just think it’s strange that some of their biggest releases also have really high resale numbers on stockx and eBay. I get it for the profit, but don’t get where the actual inventory comes

> From. Lets look at last weeks satin Black toe - Super super limited releases sold out immediately, but there have been over 3000 resold on stockx alone. How do they sell out in 5 seconds but then there are that many pairs flooded onto the secondary market?

 

Because people buy bots to get them.

 

Yes, Nike can release more shoes if they wanted, but people don’t talk as much about GR. Hype drives sales.

[tharpst]

I know all about how it works, even bought cybersole with two buddies. Did ok with it, and still using it, but had some proxy issues limiting huge scores.

 

Just a theory I have regarding Nike, could obviously be completely wrong, but I don’t think we’ll ever know for sure.

 

 

> @FaReal87 said:

> > @tharpst said:

> > I wish there was definitive evidence but I can’t actually prove it. I just think it’s strange that some of their biggest releases also have really high resale numbers on stockx and eBay. I get it for the profit, but don’t get where the actual inventory comes

> > From. Lets look at last weeks satin Black toe - Super super limited releases sold out immediately, but there have been over 3000 resold on stockx alone. How do they sell out in 5 seconds but then there are that many pairs flooded onto the secondary market?

>

> Because people buy bots to get them.

>

> Yes, Nike can release more shoes if they wanted, but people don’t talk as much about GR. Hype drives sales.

 

 

[Lesmond]

> @tharpst said:

> I wish there was definitive evidence but I can’t actually prove it. I just think it’s strange that some of their biggest releases also have really high resale numbers on stockx and eBay. I get it for the profit, but don’t get where the actual inventory comes

> From. Lets look at last weeks satin Black toe - Super super limited releases sold out immediately, but there have been over 3000 resold on stockx alone. How do they sell out in 5 seconds but then there are that many pairs flooded onto the secondary market?

 

Stores are still doing backdoor. Nike isn’t the only place that sells their limited shoes.

 

Other than Nike. Shoe palace got most of the women’s Satin AJ 1 stock.

[tmac7592]

> @Augster said:

> > @GoGoErky said:

> > > @Shades234 said:

> > > > @jay_dwight said:

> > > > > @GoGoErky said:

> > > > > > @Shades234 said:

> > > > > > I copped a pair of the white/gum 11's but I'm not really seeing any actual profit to be made from reselling. If I go on StockX, the lowest bid/ask prices don't leave any actual profit margin after fees. Has Nike been increasing quantity of release to combat resellers? Or does it take a while for the value to rise?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I have no plans of reselling mine, but I am curious about what there is to actually be gained.

> > > > >

> > > > > It’s not an og colorway. Look at the bred or Concorde on there

> > > > No way they haven’t increased supply- look at 11 Whites and Concords which were super popular selling for $250-$350 compared to 6’s or 1’s which people were divided over selling for $600-$900.

> > > >

> > > > It’s supply and demand.

> > >

> > > That's what I was thinking. There were Jordans a year or 2 back that were doubling in price instantly on EBay or StockX. Seems like Nike have started making enough shoes where there isn't profit to be made from them after paying fees. So that should be good for the ecosystem right? Resellers can't profit as easily and Nike still gets to sell out of their stock nearly instantly for "scarcity".

> >

> > The no denim have plenty of room for profit as do the Breds and concords. It’s the same on the sneaker side. Certain colors in the 1s will command higher prices over others. 11s, 3s usually do as well. It’s hit or miss on the other numbers

> >

>

> 11’s and 3’s will always have a market. The less OG the colorway, the less the shoe will fetch, generally. That said, the 11 denims were a double-up flip. My concords I wore 7 times and sold for $100 profit. Good colorways.

>

> Look at the J3 browns. No market for them. Ugly shoes. A year and a half after release and, after fees, you’ll be lucky to get back your sale price.

>

> Space Jam 11’s golf shoes will be the next big release.

>

> Lastly, not to be a conspiracy theorist or anything, but one of the biggest “resellers” is Nike. They release “X” amount to the public at, say $200, then start putting them up on StockX and eBay etc. for $400+. They won’t “sell out” on NDC if they sell them for $450. But they can sell, say, 10,000 of them in the first minute for $200 then another, say, 1000 pairs on StockX at $400+. When they don’t sell out on StockX and they are ready to move on from that release, they take those “held back” pairs and do a “restock” and sell them out, again, at retail. This is win-win for them. Sell a bunch of pairs at retail to make profit and cover all costs. Then sell fewer pairs at a huge markup to the customers that can afford it, then when that market slows down, release the rest at retail for more profit.

>

> Gotta love the shoe game.

>

 

I can’t imagine what kind of person genuinely believes this. Nike does not and never will do that lol

[ckay]

> @tmac7592 said:

> > @Augster said:

> > > @GoGoErky said:

> > > > @Shades234 said:

> > > > > @jay_dwight said:

> > > > > > @GoGoErky said:

> > > > > > > @Shades234 said:

> > > > > > > I copped a pair of the white/gum 11's but I'm not really seeing any actual profit to be made from reselling. If I go on StockX, the lowest bid/ask prices don't leave any actual profit margin after fees. Has Nike been increasing quantity of release to combat resellers? Or does it take a while for the value to rise?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I have no plans of reselling mine, but I am curious about what there is to actually be gained.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > It’s not an og colorway. Look at the bred or Concorde on there

> > > > > No way they haven’t increased supply- look at 11 Whites and Concords which were super popular selling for $250-$350 compared to 6’s or 1’s which people were divided over selling for $600-$900.

> > > > >

> > > > > It’s supply and demand.

> > > >

> > > > That's what I was thinking. There were Jordans a year or 2 back that were doubling in price instantly on EBay or StockX. Seems like Nike have started making enough shoes where there isn't profit to be made from them after paying fees. So that should be good for the ecosystem right? Resellers can't profit as easily and Nike still gets to sell out of their stock nearly instantly for "scarcity".

> > >

> > > The no denim have plenty of room for profit as do the Breds and concords. It’s the same on the sneaker side. Certain colors in the 1s will command higher prices over others. 11s, 3s usually do as well. It’s hit or miss on the other numbers

> > >

> >

> > 11’s and 3’s will always have a market. The less OG the colorway, the less the shoe will fetch, generally. That said, the 11 denims were a double-up flip. My concords I wore 7 times and sold for $100 profit. Good colorways.

> >

> > Look at the J3 browns. No market for them. Ugly shoes. A year and a half after release and, after fees, you’ll be lucky to get back your sale price.

> >

> > Space Jam 11’s golf shoes will be the next big release.

> >

> > Lastly, not to be a conspiracy theorist or anything, but one of the biggest “resellers” is Nike. They release “X” amount to the public at, say $200, then start putting them up on StockX and eBay etc. for $400+. They won’t “sell out” on NDC if they sell them for $450. But they can sell, say, 10,000 of them in the first minute for $200 then another, say, 1000 pairs on StockX at $400+. When they don’t sell out on StockX and they are ready to move on from that release, they take those “held back” pairs and do a “restock” and sell them out, again, at retail. This is win-win for them. Sell a bunch of pairs at retail to make profit and cover all costs. Then sell fewer pairs at a huge markup to the customers that can afford it, then when that market slows down, release the rest at retail for more profit.

> >

> > Gotta love the shoe game.

> >

>

> I can’t imagine what kind of person genuinely believes this. Nike does not and never will do that lol

 

Nike will not risk their multi-billion dollar brand in favor of flipping some sneakers on StockX on the low. Imagine the blackmailing potential one would have if somebody could prove this.

[Augster]

It’s called “insider trading” and is done all the time on the regular stock markets. Why would a “stock market of things” be any different?

 

I’m sure they are quite insulated. Even if they aren’t, I’m sure they are allowed to sell their product wherever they see fit and for as much as they feel they can get.

 

Believe it or not. It won’t affect anything. But any time there is profit to be made, companies just aren’t going to pass that up. I don’t think there are any laws in place that say a company HAS to sell their entire inventory. It’s their product. I’m sure they can sell them as they see fit. NDC, Foot Locker, Champs, Finish Line, Nike Outlet, Ebay. It’s not a stretch they sell on StockX.

[agood3putt]

Played my first round in my white/gum 11s today and man...most comfortable golf shoes I’ve ever worn

[AUDuffer]

> @tharpst said:

> This times 1000!!! I’m a big sneaker head, flip shoes a lot to be able to afford the ones I want. I always tell my buddies that Nike has to do this and they don’t believe me. Last Saturday, I ended up with two pairs of satin black toe in size 10.5. Bought them for $160, sold one pair for $1110 and one pair for $1133 on stockx. Nike would be crazy not to

> do this... he!!, think of it this way - if they keep 1000 pairs for secondary market resale, that’s $1,100,000 resale instead of of $160,000 retail.

>

 

LOL! If you think Nike is worried about $1.1M in sales you're kidding yourself. Let's say the resale amount is pure profit. That's less than 1% of their net income from last year which is an afterthought. 1% is a rounding error for them. They don't care about StockX.

 

[tmac7592]

> @AUDuffer said:

> > @tharpst said:

> > This times 1000!!! I’m a big sneaker head, flip shoes a lot to be able to afford the ones I want. I always tell my buddies that Nike has to do this and they don’t believe me. Last Saturday, I ended up with two pairs of satin black toe in size 10.5. Bought them for $160, sold one pair for $1110 and one pair for $1133 on stockx. Nike would be crazy not to

> > do this... he!!, think of it this way - if they keep 1000 pairs for secondary market resale, that’s $1,100,000 resale instead of of $160,000 retail.

> >

>

> LOL! If you think Nike is worried about $1.1M in sales you're kidding yourself. Let's say the resale amount is pure profit. That's less than 1% of their net income from last year which is an afterthought. 1% is a rounding error for them. They don't care about StockX.

>

 

He’s a sneaker head and reseller. Trust him. He knows man

[tharpst]

Sorry tmac, wasn’t aware opinions weren’t allowed on a forum. I’ll keep it strictly to these shoes now just for you.

 

Man, these Jordan 11 whites sure are comfortable.

 

> @tmac7592 said:

> > @AUDuffer said:

> > > @tharpst said:

> > > This times 1000!!! I’m a big sneaker head, flip shoes a lot to be able to afford the ones I want. I always tell my buddies that Nike has to do this and they don’t believe me. Last Saturday, I ended up with two pairs of satin black toe in size 10.5. Bought them for $160, sold one pair for $1110 and one pair for $1133 on stockx. Nike would be crazy not to

> > > do this... he!!, think of it this way - if they keep 1000 pairs for secondary market resale, that’s $1,100,000 resale instead of of $160,000 retail.

> > >

> >

> > LOL! If you think Nike is worried about $1.1M in sales you're kidding yourself. Let's say the resale amount is pure profit. That's less than 1% of their net income from last year which is an afterthought. 1% is a rounding error for them. They don't care about StockX.

> >

>

> He’s a sneaker head and reseller. Trust him. He knows man

 

 

[WHC888]

> @AUDuffer said:

> > @tharpst said:

> > This times 1000!!! I’m a big sneaker head, flip shoes a lot to be able to afford the ones I want. I always tell my buddies that Nike has to do this and they don’t believe me. Last Saturday, I ended up with two pairs of satin black toe in size 10.5. Bought them for $160, sold one pair for $1110 and one pair for $1133 on stockx. Nike would be crazy not to

> > do this... he!!, think of it this way - if they keep 1000 pairs for secondary market resale, that’s $1,100,000 resale instead of of $160,000 retail.

> >

>

> LOL! If you think Nike is worried about $1.1M in sales you're kidding yourself. Let's say the resale amount is pure profit. That's less than 1% of their net income from last year which is an afterthought. 1% is a rounding error for them. They don't care about StockX.

>

exactly, Nike closed down the golf division back in 2016 when they were making $700+ M in sales, $1.1M is about how much they spend on office supplies.

 

[swoosh21]

I can't see Nike selling on StockX or selling on the secondary market. All financials get reported unless it's done by employees of the company. That's a different story. StockX is rumored to manipulate the market or hold pairs to themselves. Buyers buy at a dip or at a low price, seller sends the pair, StockX notifies the buyer that they are fakes and keeps the shoes.

[tmac7592]

> @swoosh21 said:

> I can't see Nike selling on StockX or selling on the secondary market. All financials get reported unless it's done by employees of the company. That's a different story. StockX is rumored to manipulate the market or hold pairs to themselves. Buyers buy at a dip or at a low price, seller sends the pair, StockX notifies the buyer that they are fakes and keeps the shoes.

 

Yea what makes more sense, nike trying to sell on there or stock x trying to manipulate their own market, but hey everyone is entitled to their own opinion, no matter how blatantly incorrect it may be

[swoosh21]

Honestly StockX can inflate the price to make it seem like there's a huge demand in the market. Easy way to manipulate it.

[chazpet]

Side note from the alleged market manipulation, wore the ADGs to walk 9 and I must say they’re quite comfortable and hold well for non-spiked shoes. Definitely need to get ankle socks, as no shows can tend to slip below the top of the heel. Other than that no complaints... I may need to get them in black too!

[TheMarvelousOne]

so we've seen 1's, 3's, 6's, 9's, 11's and 13's.

Which model would you want to see next??

I'd say 4's or 5's but that was the beginning of my Jordan "collection" as a kid, so I'm partial to those.

[agood3putt]

4's in the Carhartt/Eminem collab would be sweet. Or the Bred's

[Lesmond]

> @TheMarvelousOne said:

> so we've seen 1's, 3's, 6's, 9's, 11's and 13's.

> Which model would you want to see next??

> I'd say 4's or 5's but that was the beginning of my Jordan "collection" as a kid, so I'm partial to those.

 

Jordan 5 low is next anyways.

 

There was supposed to be a Jordan 12 golf but I guess it was scrapped.

[jpdx]

Xii ‘s seem like they’d make great golf shoes

[TheMarvelousOne]

> @Lesmond said:

> > @TheMarvelousOne said:

> > so we've seen 1's, 3's, 6's, 9's, 11's and 13's.

> > Which model would you want to see next??

> > I'd say 4's or 5's but that was the beginning of my Jordan "collection" as a kid, so I'm partial to those.

>

> Jordan 5 low is next anyways.

>

> There was supposed to be a Jordan 12 golf but I guess it was scrapped.

 

awesome! thank you

[TheMarvelousOne]

> @Lesmond said:

> > @TheMarvelousOne said:

> > so we've seen 1's, 3's, 6's, 9's, 11's and 13's.

> > Which model would you want to see next??

> > I'd say 4's or 5's but that was the beginning of my Jordan "collection" as a kid, so I'm partial to those.

>

> Jordan 5 low is next anyways.

>

> There was supposed to be a Jordan 12 golf but I guess it was scrapped.

 

just saw the pic of the Grape 5's....not loving them but i never really cared for that colorway despite it being a hit.