Jump to content

GSS marketing or legit?


High Draws Low Fades

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, IronWolf said:

Scotty GSS 303 : Analysis document at the end attached:

GSS has more silicon, more copper, more cobalt, more molybdenum, less chromium. Less manganese. It is likely softer. the differences are measurable

@IronWolf: Thanks for sharing. 
For the tabular summary that you shared, i briefly skimmed but didn't see the source/ Link in your message .... sorry if i missed it.  
The source = Link copied below, in case the folks want to seek more info themselves?.

Link: http://forum.tourspecgolf.com/topic/30002-gss-german-303-vs-jis-sus-303/
 

Edited by JungleJimbo
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, JungleJimbo said:

@IronWolf: Thanks for sharing. 
For the tabular summary that you shared, i briefly skimmed but didn't see the source/ Link in your message .... sorry if i missed it.  
The source = Link copied below, in case the folks want to seek more info themselves?.

Link: http://forum.tourspecgolf.com/topic/30002-gss-german-303-vs-jis-sus-303/
 

Indeed correct.  It was my intent to credit the original authors. steel properties.

http://www.astmsteel.com/steel-knowledge/chemical-elements-and-effects-mechanical-properties/

Thx

cheers

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, IronWolf said:

Scotty GSS 303 : Analysis document at the end attached:

GSS has more silicon, more copper, more cobalt, more molybdenum, less chromium. Less manganese. It is likely softer. the differences are measurable, it is funny to listen to people say they know there is no difference. or conspiracy theory that it is some sort of marketing gimmick.  So you are right, you cannot tell the difference.... most likely. But if you listen to any of the interviews of Scotty he has basically made putters out of nearly every single metal alloy on the planet Earth, he would know if a certain recipe from a certain steel mill felt better to some of the professional players, but he does not recommend it if you are not a professional. so most of us should not own a German stainless steel putter.

I have continued to dig & build some webpage links for elucidating some real differences. I agree only 25% of the golfers have the hands and the skill necessary to probably feel the difference. And some golfers may prefer the slightly harder 303 version (non-GSS), But the elemental analysis of high-level laboratories can measure the difference.

 

so I know these forums are not for true learning and that most posts are less than one sentence.  so this is actual learning, a reference document,  if you do want to learn. not for the faint of heart.

Cheers

 

21 Chemical Elements and Effects on Steel Mechanical Properties

Steel in general is an alloy of carbon and iron, it does contain many other elements, some of which are retained from the steel making process, other elements are added to produce specific properties. We can see some most common chemical elements with important effects on steel properties.

 1. Carbon (C)

Carbon is the most important element in steel, it is essential in steels which have to be hardened by quenching and the degree of carbon controls the hardness and strength of the material, as well as response to heat treatment (hardenability).
And ductility, forgeability and machinability will decrease if the amount of carbon increases, as well as weldability properties of the steel.

 2. Manganese (Mn)

Manganese could be the second most important element after Carbon on steel. Mn has effects similar to those of carbon, and the steel producer uses these two elements in combination to obtain a material with the desired properties. Manganese is a necessity for the process of hot rolling of steel by its combination with oxygen and sulfur.    Its presence has below main effects:

  • It is a mild deoxidant acting as a cleanser taking the sulphur and oxygen out of the melt into the slag.
  • It increases the harden ability and tensile strength but decreases ductility.
  • It combines with sulphur to form globular manganese sulphides, essential in free cutting steels for good machinability.

Steels usually contain at least 0.30% manganese, however, amounts of up to 1.5% can be found in some carbon steels.

Manganese also tends to increase the rate of carbon penetration during carburizing and acts as a mild deoxidizing agent. However when too high carbon and too high manganese accompany each other, embrittlement sets in. Manganese is capable to form Manganese Sulphide (MnS) with sulphur, which is beneficial to machining. At the same time, it counters the brittleness from sulphur and is beneficial to the surface finish of carbon steel.

For welding purposes, the ratio of manganese to sulphur should be at least 10 to 1. Manganese content of less than 0.30% may promote internal porosity and cracking in the weld bead, cracking can also result if the content is over 0.80%. Steel with low Manganese Sulphide ratio may contain sulphur in the form of iron Sulphide (FeS), which can cause cracking in the weld.

3. Phosphorus (P)

Although it increases the tensile strength of steel and improves machinability it is generally regarded as an undesirable impurity because of its embrittling effect.

Effect of phosphorus element will have various effects on steel depending on concentration.
The maximum amount of phosphorus in higher grade steel is between 0.03 to 0.05% due to the fact that is detrimental. Up to 0.10% of phosphorus in low-alloy high-strength steels will increase the strength as well as improve the steel's resistance against corrosion. The possibility of brittlement increases when the content in hardened steel is too high. Even though the strength and hardness is improved, the ductility and toughness decreases.

The machinability is improved in free-cutting steel, but weld brittle and/or weld cracks can occur during welding if the phosphorus content is more than 0.04%. Phosphorus also affects the thickness of the zinc layer when galvanising steel.

4. Sulfur (S)

Sulfur is normally regarded as an impurity and has an adverse effect on impact properties when a steel is high in sulphur and low in manganese. Sulphur improves machinability but lowers transverse ductility and notched impact toughness and has little effects on the longitudinal mechanical properties. Its content is limited to 0.05% in steels but is added to free cutting steels in amount up to 0.35% with the manganese content increased to counter any detrimental effects since alloying additions of sulfur in amounts from 0.10% to 0.30% will tend to improve the machinability of a steel. Such types may be referred to as "resulfurized" or "freemachining". Free cutting steels have sulphur added to improve machinability, usually up to a maximum of 0.35%.

Even though the effect of sulphur on steel is negative at certain stages, any sulphur content less than 0.05% has a positive effect on steel grades.

5. Silicon (Si)

Silicon is one of the principal deoxidizers for steel. Silicon helps to remove bubbles of oxygen from the molten steel. It is the element that is most commonly used to produce semi- and fully killed steels, and normally appears in amounts less than 0.40 percent, usually only small amounts (0.20%) are present in rolled steel when it is used as a deoxidizer. However, in steel castings, 0.35 to 1.00% is commonly present.

Silicon dissolves in iron and tends to strengthen it. Some filler metals may contain up to 1% to provide enhanced cleaning and deoxidation for welding on contaminated surfaces. When these filler metals are used for welding on clean surfaces, the resulting weld metal strength will be markedly increased. Silicon increases strength and hardness but to a lesser extent than manganese. The resulting decrease in ductility could resent cracking problems.

For galvanizing purposes, steels containing more than 0.04% silicon can greatly affect the thickness and appearance of the galvanized coating. This will result in thick coatings consisting mainly zinc-iron alloys and the surface has a dark and dull finish. But it provides as much corrosion protection as a shiny galvanized coating where the outer layer is pure zinc.

6. Chromium (Cr)

Chromium is a powerful alloying element in steel. Cr presents in certain structural steels in small amounts. It is primarily used to increase hardenability of steel and increase the corrosion resistance as well as the yield strength of the steel material. For that reason often occurs in combination with nickel and copper. Stainless steels may contain in excess of 12% chromium. The well-known “18-8” stainless steel contains 8 percent of nickel and 18 percent of chromium.

When the percent of chromium in the steel exceeds 1.1% a surface layer is formed that helps protect the steel against oxidation.

7. Vanadium (V)

The effects of Vanadium chemical element are similar to those of Mn, Mo, and Cb. When used with other alloying elements it restricts grain growth, refines grain size, increases hardenability, fracture toughness, and resistance to shock loading. Softening at high temperatures, fatigue stress and wear resistance are improved. At greater than 0.05%, there may be a tendency for the steel to become embrittled during thermal stress relief treatments.

Vanadium is used in nitriding, heat resisting, tool and spring steels together with other alloying elements.

8. Tungsten (W)

It is used with chromium, vanadium, molybdenum, or manganese to produce high speed steel used in cutting tools. Tungsten steel is said to be "red-hard" or hard enough to cut after it becomes red-hot.
After heat treatment the steel maintains its hardness at high temperature making it particularly suitable for cutting tools.

Tungsten in the form of tungsten carbide

  • Gives steel high hardness even at red heats.
  • Promotes fine grains
  • Resists heat
  • Promote strength at elevated temperatures

9. Molybdenum (Mo)

Molybdenum has effects similar to manganese and vanadium, and is often used in combination with one or the other. This element is a strong carbide former and is usually present in alloy steels in amounts less than 1%. It increases hardenability and elevated temperature strength and also improves corrosion resistance as well as increased creep strength. It is added to stainless steels to increase their resistance to corrosion and is also used in high speed tool steels.

10. Cobalt (Co)

Cobalt improves strength at high temperatures and magnetic permeability.

Increases hardness, also allows for higher quenching temperatures (during the heat treatment procedure). Intensifies the individual effects of other elements in more complex steels. Co is not a carbide former, however adding Cobalt to the alloy allows for higher attainable hardness and higher red hot hardness.

11. Nickel (Ni)

In addition to its favorable effect on the corrosion resistance of steel, Ni is added to steels to increase hardenability. Nickel enhances the low-temperature behavior of the material by improving the fracture toughness. The weldability of the steel is not decreased by the presence of this element. The nickel drastically increases the notch toughness of the steel.

Nickel is often used in combination with other alloying elements, especially chromium and molybdenum. It is a key component in stainless steels but at the low concentrations found in carbon steels. Stainless steels contain between 8% and 14% nickel.

One more reason Ni is added to an alloy is that it creates brighter portions in damascus steels.

12. Copper (Cu)

Copper is another primary corrosion resistance elements. It also has a small impact on hardenability. It is typically found in amounts not less than 0.20 percent, and is the primary anti-corrosion component in steel grades like A242 and A441.

Most often found as a residual agent in steels, copper is also added to produce precipitation hardening properties and increase corrosion resistance.

13. Aluminum (Al)

Aluminum is one of the most important deoxidizers in very small amounts in the material, and also
helps form a more fine-grained crystalline microstructure and increase the steel grade’s toughness. It is usually used in combination with silicon to obtain a semi- or fully killed steel.

14. Titanium (Ti)

Ti is used to control grain size growth, which improves toughness. Also transforms sulfide inclusions form elongated to globular, improving strength and corrosion resistance as well as toughness and ductility.

Ti is a very strong, very lightweight metal that can be used alone or alloyed with steels. It is added to steel to give them high strength at high temperatures. Modern jet engines used titanium steels.

  • It prevents localized depletion of chromium in stainless steels during long heating
  • Prevents formation of austenite in high chromium steels
  • Reduces martensitic hardness and hardenability in medium chromium steels.

15. Niobium(Nb, formerly known as Columbium-Columbium, Cb )

Niobium is a key grain refining element, as well a strength-enhancing elements in steel production. Niobium is a strong carbide former and forms very hard, very small, simple carbides. Improves ductility, hardness, wear and corrosion resistance. Also, refines grain structure. Formerly known as Columbium.

16. Boron (B)

The most important effect and the purpose of boron in steel is to drastically improve the hardenability.

The biggest advantage of boron is that a small amount can be added to get the same result as other elements required in large amount in terms of added hardenability. Typical range in steel alloys is 0.0005 to 0.003%.

During the heat treatment process boron, a replacement for other elements, is added to increase the hardenability of medium carbon steel. The cutting performance for high-speed steels is increased but at the expense of the forging quality. It is also possible that the content of boron can be too high which decreases hardenability, toughness as well as cause embrittlement. The percentage carbon present in the steel also plays a role in the hardenability effect of boron. As boron's effect on hardenability increases the amount of carbon should proportionally be decreased.

When boron is added to steel, precaution must be taken to ensure that it does not react with oxygen or nitrogen as the combination of boron with either one of the two will make the boron useless.

17. Lead (Pb)

The addition of lead in levels in very small amounts to improve machinability, up to 0.30%, improves machinability. Providing the distribution is homogenous it has little effect on the physical properties of the steel, and contrary to popular belief, it does not affect weld ability.

18. Zirconium (Zr)

Zirconium is added to steel to modify the shape of inclusions. Typically added to low alloy, low carbon steels. The result is that toughness and ductility are improved when transforms shape from elongated to globular, improving toughness and ductility.

19. Tantalum (Ta)

Chemically very similar to Niobium (Nb), as such, has similar effect on the alloy - forms very hard, very small, simple carbides. Improves ductility, hardness, wear and corrosion resistance. Also, refines grain.

20. Nitrogen (N)

Nitrogen acts very similar to Carbon in the alloy. N substitutes C in small amounts (or even large, with modern technologies) to increase hardness. Obviously, Nitrogen forms Nitrides, not Carbides. INFI has N, and there's few more, with Sandvik being the champion, having 3% N in the alloy, completely substituting C. Sadly, not available for knife makers. Because Nitrogen is less prone to form Chromium nitrides than Carbon is to form Chromium carbides, its presence improves corrosion resistance, leaving more free Chromium in the alloy. Since Nitrogen is less reactive in forming Nitrides, it can be used for added hardness without increasing carbide size and volume, e.g. Sandvik 14C28N steel.

21. Selenium (Se)

Typically not desirable in cutlery steel. Added to improve machinability. Similar with Sulfur, in the same chalcogen group.

 

 

Scotty GSS elemental analysis vs common 303.jpg

 

B.S. masquerading as science. Show me how it matters to a golfer.  Hint: it doesn't.

 

I could prove there is a "measurable difference" between two turds I drop. But at the end of the day they are just turds.

Edited by Mustard_Tiger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Mustard_Tiger said:

 

B.S. masquerading as science. Show me how it matters to a golfer.  Hint: it doesn't.

 

I could prove there is a "measurable difference" between two turds I drop. But at the end of the day they are just turds.

It was stated that there is probably five different types of golfer that is why we have handicaps. 80% the "a golfer" do not really pay attention to the details of putting the same as a professional. As more and more engineers start studying the elements of putting, they are uncovering multiple simultaneous things to consider.  The top three the big three putter manufacturers have all stated that one of the most important things to feel, is the sound the putter makes with contact with the ball. 80% of the golfers I know play a different construction golf ball every week or every round, and half of them hit range balls. It is becoming clear the resonance frequency, the tone of the putter, the tone of the ball, are a major part of the feel, as well as the velocity of the ball off of the face.  Professionals play one type of ball for years that is how they get the sensitivity of what a different putter sounds and feels like when they stroke the ball. It sounds, feels, and has a different velocity off of the face.  So I would say it until you start playing one particular ball most golfers would not have that ability to feel a difference in the putter, it already feels different every time they putt because of the different balls they use. So I agree it does not matter because we play such different types of balls every week. 

I believe there is going to be some more studies coming out on how different ball types skid and spin and vary launch angle off of the various new putter designs, that different ball construction is a strong consideration on what type of putter you should put in play. Similar to the studies with driver spin and launch angle.

Cheers

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Mustard_Tiger said:

 

B.S. masquerading as science. Show me how it matters to a golfer.  Hint: it doesn't.

 

I could prove there is a "measurable difference" between two turds I drop. But at the end of the day they are just turds.

Goal posts moved.  Lol.   Nobody anywhere asked if it helped a golfer.  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Callaway epic max LS 9* GD-M9003 7x 

TM Sim2 max tour  16* GD  ADHD 8x 

srixon zx 19* elements 9F5T 

Cobra king SZ 25.5* KBS TD cat 5 70 

TM p7mc 5-pw Mmt125tx 

Mizuno T22 raw 52-56-60 s400

LAB Mezz Max armlock 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, IronWolf said:

It was stated that there is probably five different types of golfer that is why we have handicaps. 80% the "a golfer" do not really pay attention to the details of putting the same as a professional. As more and more engineers start studying the elements of putting, they are uncovering multiple simultaneous things to consider.  The top three the big three putter manufacturers have all stated that one of the most important things to feel, is the sound the putter makes with contact with the ball. 80% of the golfers I know play a different construction golf ball every week or every round, and half of them hit range balls. It is becoming clear the resonance frequency, the tone of the putter, the tone of the ball, are a major part of the feel, as well as the velocity of the ball off of the face.  Professionals play one type of ball for years that is how they get the sensitivity of what a different putter sounds and feels like when they stroke the ball. It sounds, feels, and has a different velocity off of the face.  So I would say it until you start playing one particular ball most golfers would not have that ability to feel a difference in the putter, it already feels different every time they putt because of the different balls they use. So I agree it does not matter because we play such different types of balls every week. 

I believe there is going to be some more studies coming out on how different ball types skid and spin and vary launch angle off of the various new putter designs, that different ball construction is a strong consideration on what type of putter you should put in play. Similar to the studies with driver spin and launch angle.

Cheers

Thanks for posting that.  Makes perfect sense from a welders point of view.  Explains why I saw how much cleaner GSS would burn than plain 303.  

  • Like 2

Callaway epic max LS 9* GD-M9003 7x 

TM Sim2 max tour  16* GD  ADHD 8x 

srixon zx 19* elements 9F5T 

Cobra king SZ 25.5* KBS TD cat 5 70 

TM p7mc 5-pw Mmt125tx 

Mizuno T22 raw 52-56-60 s400

LAB Mezz Max armlock 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

As Cameron offers putters in both GSS and SSS, can anyone tell me the difference between the two (besides the price)?

What does Scotty say, and what do those who have tried both say about the relative differences?

The marketing is overwhelming. I just bought a Gamer (by theputtingengineer) and it is competitive with any Scotty.

Driver: Ping G425 Max 12 deg w/MR Tensei Orange R
Woods: Ping G425 5w & 7w w/MR Tensei Orange R
Hybrid: Ping G410 26 deg w/MR Diamana Blueboard R
Irons: Ping i230 5-U w/Nippon Modulus3 105S
Wedges: Ping Eye 2 Gorge SW w/DG Spinner/Cleveland 588 Tour Issue 64 deg w/DG S400
Putter: Bettinardi Queen B #10
Ball: Titleist ProV1x (2021) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/14/2021 at 5:53 PM, bladehunter said:

Thanks for posting that.  Makes perfect sense from a welders point of view.  Explains why I saw how much cleaner GSS would burn than plain 303.  

303 is a pretty crappy material when it comes to industrial uses. 304 is a far superior alloy. 
 

-pretty sure I typed this response in 2005 also-

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/24/2021 at 7:48 PM, Double Rods said:

303 is a pretty crappy material when it comes to industrial uses. 304 is a far superior alloy. 
 

-pretty sure I typed this response in 2005 also-

 

Good thing putters are not intended for industrial uses.

  • Thanks 1

Driver:  TaylorMade 300 Mini 11.5° (10.2°), Fujikura Ventus Blue 5S Velocore

3W:  TaylorMade M4 15°, Graphite Design Tour AD DI 7S

Hybrid:  TaylorMade Sim2 2 Iron Hybrid 17°, Mitsubishi Tensai AV Raw Blue 80 stiff

Irons:  Mizuno Pro 223 4-PW, Nippon Modus3 Tour 120 stiff

GW / SW: Mizuno T-22, 52° (bent to 50°)/ 56° (bent to 54°), True Temper S400

LW:  Scratch Golf 1018 forged 58° DS, Nippon Modus3 Tour 120 stiff

Putter:  Byron Morgan Epic Day custom, Salty MidPlus cork grip

Grips:  BestGrips Augusta Microperf leather slip on

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

303 is the "360 brass" of St St's. In harsh environments and where issues of wear & tear are critical it is not the choice. For forming not the choice. For a complex, critically dimensioned machined products that are durable in a medium duty sense, ideal.

 

I make stuff that requires multi axis CNC's to one off.  303 is so much more desirable to work with especially at volume.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/22/2020 at 5:58 PM, Phabs said:

100% marketing and flash terming. I own two gss putters and they feel no different from others I have.  Anyone that says there’s a feel difference is nuts, the only feel difference is in their wallet not their hands. 
 

My GSS DH89 doesn’t feel near as nice as my SS DH89.   The stainless Byron is the most solid feeling putter I’ve ever struck in my life and has been permanently in the bag for a year and a half now.  

I have a putter made out of Vibranium....got it in Wakanda a few years ago.....thing is solid as it gets but yea.....GSS is just a marketing term.....

 

Here are the top exporters of stainless steel (2019 #'s)...if another putter company was smart, they would make putters from Sweden and call it SSS or use the US steel and call is USSS with red white and blue paint fill....

 

  1. United Kingdom: US$445.5 million (23.4% of stainless steel exports)
  2. Indonesia: $430.9 million (22.6%)
  3. Sweden: $210.8 million (11.1%)
  4. Italy: $100.9 million (5.3%)
  5. United States: $98.7 million (5.2%)
  6. Austria: $93 million (4.9%)
  7. Spain: $89.6 million (4.7%)
  8. Germany: $70 million (3.7%)
  9. France: $65.2 million (3.4%)
  10. Taiwan: $44.3 million (2.3%)
  11. Malaysia: $35.9 million (1.9%)
  12. Belgium: $29.7 million (1.6%)
  13. Netherlands: $21 million (1.1%)
  14. Finland: $19.1 million (1%)
  15. India: $17.4 million (0.9%

 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • 2024 Zurich Classic - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Zurich Classic - Monday #1
      2024 Zurich Classic - Monday #2
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Alex Fitzpatrick - WITB - 2024 Zurich Classic
      Austin Cook - WITB - 2024 Zurich Classic
      Alejandro Tosti - WITB - 2024 Zurich Classic
      Davis Riley - WITB - 2024 Zurich Classic
      MJ Daffue - WITB - 2024 Zurich Classic
      Nate Lashley - WITB - 2024 Zurich Classic
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      MJ Daffue's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Zurich Classic
      Cameron putters - 2024 Zurich Classic
      Swag covers ( a few custom for Nick Hardy) - 2024 Zurich Classic
      Custom Bettinardi covers for Matt and Alex Fitzpatrick - 2024 Zurich Classic
       
       
       
      • 1 reply
    • 2024 RBC Heritage - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or comments here
       
       
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 RBC Heritage - Monday #1
      2024 RBC Heritage - Monday #2
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Justin Thomas - WITB - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Justin Rose - WITB - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Chandler Phillips - WITB - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Nick Dunlap - WITB - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Thomas Detry - WITB - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Austin Eckroat - WITB - 2024 RBC Heritage
       
       
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      Wyndham Clark's Odyssey putter - 2024 RBC Heritage
      JT's new Cameron putter - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Justin Thomas testing new Titleist 2 wood - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Cameron putters - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Odyssey putter with triple track alignment aid - 2024 RBC Heritage
      Scotty Cameron The Blk Box putting alignment aid/training aid - 2024 RBC Heritage
       
       
       
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 7 replies
    • 2024 Masters - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Huge shoutout to our member Stinger2irons for taking and posting photos from Augusta
       
       
      Tuesday
       
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 1
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 2
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 3
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 4
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 5
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 6
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 7
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 8
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 9
      The Masters 2024 – Pt. 10
       
       
       
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 14 replies
    • Rory McIlroy testing a new TaylorMade "PROTO" 4-iron – 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Rory McIlroy testing a new TaylorMade "PROTO" 4-iron – 2024 Valero Texas Open
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 93 replies
    • 2024 Valero Texas Open - Discussion and Links to Photos
      Please put any questions or Comments here
       
       
       
      General Albums
       
      2024 Valero Texas Open - Monday #1
      2024 Valero Texas Open - Tuesday #1
       
       
       
       
       
      WITB Albums
       
      Ben Taylor - WITB - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Paul Barjon - WITB - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Joe Sullivan - WITB - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Wilson Furr - WITB - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Ben Willman - SoTex PGA Section Champ - WITB - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Jimmy Stanger - WITB - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Rickie Fowler - WITB - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Harrison Endycott - WITB - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Vince Whaley - WITB - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Kevin Chappell - WITB - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Christian Bezuidenhout - WITB (mini) - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Scott Gutschewski - WITB - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Michael S. Kim WITB – 2024 Valero Texas Open
       
       
       
      Pullout Albums
       
      Cameron putter - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Ben Taylor with new Titleist TRS 2 wood - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Swag cover - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Greyson Sigg's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Davis Riley's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Josh Teater's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Hzrdus T1100 is back - - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Mark Hubbard testing ported Titleist irons – 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Tyson Alexander testing new Titleist TRS 2 wood - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Hideki Matsuyama's custom Cameron putter - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Cobra putters - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Joel Dahmen WITB – 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Axis 1 broomstick putter - 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Rory McIlroy testing a new TaylorMade "PROTO" 4-iron – 2024 Valero Texas Open
      Rory McIlroy's Trackman numbers w/ driver on the range – 2024 Valero Texas Open
       
       
       
        • Like
      • 4 replies

×
×
  • Create New...