Cameron Champ lost his mojo

[Santiago Golf]

I dont think people realize how hard it is to put 2 great rounds, 1 good, and one avg round together to win a tournament and then try to do that multiple times a year, as a rookie, while dealing with an injury and everyone staring at you.

 

To put in normal terms, leys say your an 18 handicap, 81 would be a great round. So tell me next time you shoot 81, 90, 83, 85; in a four stretch. Sounds pretty tough right, thats how hard it is to win out there.

[Steele47]

When he wore those different color from one another shoes,, I was all, "uh ooh". It's true. Just ask the gals at my hair salon.

[grm24]

> @Steele47 said:

> When he wore those different color from one another shoes,, I was all, "uh ooh". It's true. Just ask the gals at my hair salon.

You might want to take a moment to brush up on why he did that.

[Steele47]

> @grm24 said:

> > @Steele47 said:

> > When he wore those different color from one another shoes,, I was all, "uh ooh". It's true. Just ask the gals at my hair salon.

> You might want to take a moment to brush up on why he did that.

 

Don't need to. I know why and applaud why he did it. Thanks though!

[PowderedToastMan]

> @Titleist99 said:

> > @bladehunter said:

> > > @ksgolfcoach said:

> > > > @Railroading13 said:

> > > > The game will always be about how often you get the ball up and down from 150 yards and in - everything else - distance... is just hype

> > >

> > > Any stats to back this up?

> > >

> > >

> >

> > Just common sense. You can hit it in the weeds and get up and down and beat anybody. Or you can hit it in the fairway , hit greens and 2-3 putt only and beat nobody.

> Absolutely correct......a scrambling Tiger is fun to watch. Woods never was the best driver of the golf ball. He became a great player when he developed an arm swing with his wedges.....length is great but I would rather have a killer iron game.

>

“Woods never was the best driver of the golf ball”.

 

You clearly didn’t watch golf or view statistics during the turn of the century. He was the best driver on tour and it wasn’t even close.

 

I’m so confused how people make these statements of supposed fact that are in no way based in reality. If you aren’t sure of something, don’t state your opinion as fact.

 

[Titleist99]

> @PowderedToastMan said:

> > @Titleist99 said:

> > > @bladehunter said:

> > > > @ksgolfcoach said:

> > > > > @Railroading13 said:

> > > > > The game will always be about how often you get the ball up and down from 150 yards and in - everything else - distance... is just hype

> > > >

> > > > Any stats to back this up?

> > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > Just common sense. You can hit it in the weeds and get up and down and beat anybody. Or you can hit it in the fairway , hit greens and 2-3 putt only and beat nobody.

> > Absolutely correct......a scrambling Tiger is fun to watch. Woods never was the best driver of the golf ball. He became a great player when he developed an arm swing with his wedges.....length is great but I would rather have a killer iron game.

> >

> “Woods never was the best driver of the golf ball”.

>

> You clearly didn’t watch golf or view statistics during the turn of the century. He was the best driver on tour and it wasn’t even close.

>

> I’m so confused how people make these statements of supposed fact that are in no way based in reality. If you aren’t sure of something, don’t state your opinion as fact.

>

Tiger Woods was one of the longest driver of the golf ball, accuracy was never a strong suit. That fact, not opinion.

When Woods was coached by Butch Harmon, and consistently hitting 65-70% of the fairways, he owned Bay Hill, hoisting the trophy four straight times from 2000 to 2003. But in March of 2004, he began tweaking his swing with his new coach, Hank Haney, who espoused a flatter action that created an unintended byproduct — impaired driving. That year he went under the 60% mark, to 56.1% of fairways hit, 182nd out of 196 players on tour. Not surprisingly, he didn't win Bay Hill in 2004, and he hasn't since. The low point came on Sunday last year, when Woods chipped out of the rough on 18 only to hit his third in the water on the way to a triple-bogey 7. He signed for a 76 (and a tie for 22nd place) and left the course without comment.

I watched Plenty of golf in the 2000's....

[PowderedToastMan]

> @Titleist99 said:

> > @PowderedToastMan said:

> > > @Titleist99 said:

> > > > @bladehunter said:

> > > > > @ksgolfcoach said:

> > > > > > @Railroading13 said:

> > > > > > The game will always be about how often you get the ball up and down from 150 yards and in - everything else - distance... is just hype

> > > > >

> > > > > Any stats to back this up?

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > Just common sense. You can hit it in the weeds and get up and down and beat anybody. Or you can hit it in the fairway , hit greens and 2-3 putt only and beat nobody.

> > > Absolutely correct......a scrambling Tiger is fun to watch. Woods never was the best driver of the golf ball. He became a great player when he developed an arm swing with his wedges.....length is great but I would rather have a killer iron game.

> > >

> > “Woods never was the best driver of the golf ball”.

> >

> > You clearly didn’t watch golf or view statistics during the turn of the century. He was the best driver on tour and it wasn’t even close.

> >

> > I’m so confused how people make these statements of supposed fact that are in no way based in reality. If you aren’t sure of something, don’t state your opinion as fact.

> >

> Tiger Woods was one of the longest driver of the golf ball, accuracy was never a strong suit. That fact, not opinion.

> When Woods was coached by Butch Harmon, and consistently hitting 65-70% of the fairways, he owned Bay Hill, hoisting the trophy four straight times from 2000 to 2003. But in March of 2004, he began tweaking his swing with his new coach, Hank Haney, who espoused a flatter action that created an unintended byproduct — impaired driving. That year he went under the 60% mark, to 56.1% of fairways hit, 182nd out of 196 players on tour. Not surprisingly, he didn't win Bay Hill in 2004, and he hasn't since. The low point came on Sunday last year, when Woods chipped out of the rough on 18 only to hit his third in the water on the way to a triple-bogey 7. He signed for a 76 (and a tie for 22nd place) and left the course without comment.

> I watched Plenty of golf in the 2000's....

 

Tiger has won at Bay Hill 4 times since 2004. You are proving my point that you are making up facts that are completely false.

 

By the way, finishing 2nd in driving distance while hitting about 65% of fairways is EXTREMELY accurate.

[ksgolfcoach]

> @Titleist99 said:

> > @PowderedToastMan said:

> > > @Titleist99 said:

> > > > @bladehunter said:

> > > > > @ksgolfcoach said:

> > > > > > @Railroading13 said:

> > > > > > The game will always be about how often you get the ball up and down from 150 yards and in - everything else - distance... is just hype

> > > > >

> > > > > Any stats to back this up?

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > Just common sense. You can hit it in the weeds and get up and down and beat anybody. Or you can hit it in the fairway , hit greens and 2-3 putt only and beat nobody.

> > > Absolutely correct......a scrambling Tiger is fun to watch. Woods never was the best driver of the golf ball. He became a great player when he developed an arm swing with his wedges.....length is great but I would rather have a killer iron game.

> > >

> > “Woods never was the best driver of the golf ball”.

> >

> > You clearly didn’t watch golf or view statistics during the turn of the century. He was the best driver on tour and it wasn’t even close.

> >

> > I’m so confused how people make these statements of supposed fact that are in no way based in reality. If you aren’t sure of something, don’t state your opinion as fact.

> >

> Tiger Woods was one of the longest driver of the golf ball, accuracy was never a strong suit. That fact, not opinion.

> When Woods was coached by Butch Harmon, and consistently hitting 65-70% of the fairways, he owned Bay Hill, hoisting the trophy four straight times from 2000 to 2003. But in March of 2004, he began tweaking his swing with his new coach, Hank Haney, who espoused a flatter action that created an unintended byproduct — impaired driving. That year he went under the 60% mark, to 56.1% of fairways hit, 182nd out of 196 players on tour. Not surprisingly, he didn't win Bay Hill in 2004, and he hasn't since. The low point came on Sunday last year, when Woods chipped out of the rough on 18 only to hit his third in the water on the way to a triple-bogey 7. He signed for a 76 (and a tie for 22nd place) and left the course without comment.

> I watched Plenty of golf in the 2000's....

 

 

Then you would have seen tiger win bay hill in 2008, 2009, 2012 and 2013

[grm24]

> @Titleist99 said:

> > @PowderedToastMan said:

> > > @Titleist99 said:

> > > > @bladehunter said:

> > > > > @ksgolfcoach said:

> > > > > > @Railroading13 said:

> > > > > > The game will always be about how often you get the ball up and down from 150 yards and in - everything else - distance... is just hype

> > > > >

> > > > > Any stats to back this up?

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > Just common sense. You can hit it in the weeds and get up and down and beat anybody. Or you can hit it in the fairway , hit greens and 2-3 putt only and beat nobody.

> > > Absolutely correct......a scrambling Tiger is fun to watch. Woods never was the best driver of the golf ball. He became a great player when he developed an arm swing with his wedges.....length is great but I would rather have a killer iron game.

> > >

> > “Woods never was the best driver of the golf ball”.

> >

> > You clearly didn’t watch golf or view statistics during the turn of the century. He was the best driver on tour and it wasn’t even close.

> >

> > I’m so confused how people make these statements of supposed fact that are in no way based in reality. If you aren’t sure of something, don’t state your opinion as fact.

> >

> Tiger Woods was one of the longest driver of the golf ball, accuracy was never a strong suit. That fact, not opinion.

> When Woods was coached by Butch Harmon, and consistently hitting 65-70% of the fairways, he owned Bay Hill, hoisting the trophy four straight times from 2000 to 2003. But in March of 2004, he began tweaking his swing with his new coach, Hank Haney, who espoused a flatter action that created an unintended byproduct — impaired driving. That year he went under the 60% mark, to 56.1% of fairways hit, 182nd out of 196 players on tour. Not surprisingly, he didn't win Bay Hill in 2004, and he hasn't since. **The low point came on Sunday last year, when Woods chipped out of the rough on 18 only to hit his third in the water on the way to a triple-bogey 7. He signed for a 76 (and a tie for 22nd place) and left the course without comment.**

> I watched Plenty of golf in the 2000's....

 

LOL! Woods finished 5th @ Bay Bay Hill last year shooting a final round 69. Appears you do not watch much golf at all.

 

BTW your post above is a cut/paste job from and old article (2008).

https://www.golf.com/tour-and-news/tiger-woods-one-wildest-drivers-tour-more-ever-2008-so-how-come-he-cant-stop-winning

[Titleist99]

> @grm24 said:

> > @Titleist99 said:

> > > @PowderedToastMan said:

> > > > @Titleist99 said:

> > > > > @bladehunter said:

> > > > > > @ksgolfcoach said:

> > > > > > > @Railroading13 said:

> > > > > > > The game will always be about how often you get the ball up and down from 150 yards and in - everything else - distance... is just hype

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Any stats to back this up?

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Just common sense. You can hit it in the weeds and get up and down and beat anybody. Or you can hit it in the fairway , hit greens and 2-3 putt only and beat nobody.

> > > > Absolutely correct......a scrambling Tiger is fun to watch. Woods never was the best driver of the golf ball. He became a great player when he developed an arm swing with his wedges.....length is great but I would rather have a killer iron game.

> > > >

> > > “Woods never was the best driver of the golf ball”.

> > >

> > > You clearly didn’t watch golf or view statistics during the turn of the century. He was the best driver on tour and it wasn’t even close.

> > >

> > > I’m so confused how people make these statements of supposed fact that are in no way based in reality. If you aren’t sure of something, don’t state your opinion as fact.

> > >

> > Tiger Woods was one of the longest driver of the golf ball, accuracy was never a strong suit. That fact, not opinion.

> > When Woods was coached by Butch Harmon, and consistently hitting 65-70% of the fairways, he owned Bay Hill, hoisting the trophy four straight times from 2000 to 2003. But in March of 2004, he began tweaking his swing with his new coach, Hank Haney, who espoused a flatter action that created an unintended byproduct — impaired driving. That year he went under the 60% mark, to 56.1% of fairways hit, 182nd out of 196 players on tour. Not surprisingly, he didn't win Bay Hill in 2004, and he hasn't since. **The low point came on Sunday last year, when Woods chipped out of the rough on 18 only to hit his third in the water on the way to a triple-bogey 7. He signed for a 76 (and a tie for 22nd place) and left the course without comment.**

> > I watched Plenty of golf in the 2000's....

>

> LOL! Woods finished 5th @ Bay Bay Hill last year shooting a final round 69. Appears you do not watch much golf at all.

>

> BTW your post above is a cut/paste job from and old article (2008).

> https://www.golf.com/tour-and-news/tiger-woods-one-wildest-drivers-tour-more-ever-2008-so-how-come-he-cant-stop-winning

Maybe you'll believe Butch Harmon

[grm24]

> @Titleist99 said:

> > @grm24 said:

> > > @Titleist99 said:

> > > > @PowderedToastMan said:

> > > > > @Titleist99 said:

> > > > > > @bladehunter said:

> > > > > > > @ksgolfcoach said:

> > > > > > > > @Railroading13 said:

> > > > > > > > The game will always be about how often you get the ball up and down from 150 yards and in - everything else - distance... is just hype

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Any stats to back this up?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Just common sense. You can hit it in the weeds and get up and down and beat anybody. Or you can hit it in the fairway , hit greens and 2-3 putt only and beat nobody.

> > > > > Absolutely correct......a scrambling Tiger is fun to watch. Woods never was the best driver of the golf ball. He became a great player when he developed an arm swing with his wedges.....length is great but I would rather have a killer iron game.

> > > > >

> > > > “Woods never was the best driver of the golf ball”.

> > > >

> > > > You clearly didn’t watch golf or view statistics during the turn of the century. He was the best driver on tour and it wasn’t even close.

> > > >

> > > > I’m so confused how people make these statements of supposed fact that are in no way based in reality. If you aren’t sure of something, don’t state your opinion as fact.

> > > >

> > > Tiger Woods was one of the longest driver of the golf ball, accuracy was never a strong suit. That fact, not opinion.

> > > When Woods was coached by Butch Harmon, and consistently hitting 65-70% of the fairways, he owned Bay Hill, hoisting the trophy four straight times from 2000 to 2003. But in March of 2004, he began tweaking his swing with his new coach, Hank Haney, who espoused a flatter action that created an unintended byproduct — impaired driving. That year he went under the 60% mark, to 56.1% of fairways hit, 182nd out of 196 players on tour. Not surprisingly, he didn't win Bay Hill in 2004, and he hasn't since. **The low point came on Sunday last year, when Woods chipped out of the rough on 18 only to hit his third in the water on the way to a triple-bogey 7. He signed for a 76 (and a tie for 22nd place) and left the course without comment.**

> > > I watched Plenty of golf in the 2000's....

> >

> > LOL! Woods finished 5th @ Bay Bay Hill last year shooting a final round 69. Appears you do not watch much golf at all.

> >

> > BTW your post above is a cut/paste job from and old article (2008).

> > https://www.golf.com/tour-and-news/tiger-woods-one-wildest-drivers-tour-more-ever-2008-so-how-come-he-cant-stop-winning

> Maybe you'll believe Butch Harmon

 

I've never said a word about TW driving issues and don't care what Harmon had to say on it. I and others simply pointed out that you posted bad information about Tiger never winning Bay Hill after 2004 and TW shooting 76 at Bay Hill last year in the final round. You copied/pasted an 11 year old article and tried to pass it off as your own words in this thread. That much is factual.

[OldTomMorris]

His iron play stats are noticeably awful.

[gioguy21]

> @OldTomMorris said:

> His iron play stats are noticeably awful.

 

trolling or serious...hope you're joking lol

 

*edit, my bad, you meant champ, not tiger hahaha

[QuigleyDU]

I hope we see him come around, I would love to see him as a regular contender.

[OldTomMorris]

> @gioguy21 said:

> > @OldTomMorris said:

> > His iron play stats are noticeably awful.

>

> trolling or serious...hope you're joking lol

 

The GIR stat doesn't tell the story.

SG: Approach the Green 153rd.

Proximity to the hole 168th.

 

[gioguy21]

> @OldTomMorris said:

> > @gioguy21 said:

> > > @OldTomMorris said:

> > > His iron play stats are noticeably awful.

> >

> > trolling or serious...hope you're joking lol

>

> The GIR stat doesn't tell the story.

> SG: Approach the Green 153rd.

> Proximity to the hole 168th.

>

 

see my edit - my bad dood. didn't know you meant champ -- b/c previous posts were bout tiger.

[Titleist99]

> @grm24 said:

> > @Titleist99 said:

> > > @grm24 said:

> > > > @Titleist99 said:

> > > > > @PowderedToastMan said:

> > > > > > @Titleist99 said:

> > > > > > > @bladehunter said:

> > > > > > > > @ksgolfcoach said:

> > > > > > > > > @Railroading13 said:

> > > > > > > > > The game will always be about how often you get the ball up and down from 150 yards and in - everything else - distance... is just hype

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Any stats to back this up?

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Just common sense. You can hit it in the weeds and get up and down and beat anybody. Or you can hit it in the fairway , hit greens and 2-3 putt only and beat nobody.

> > > > > > Absolutely correct......a scrambling Tiger is fun to watch. Woods never was the best driver of the golf ball. He became a great player when he developed an arm swing with his wedges.....length is great but I would rather have a killer iron game.

> > > > > >

> > > > > “Woods never was the best driver of the golf ball”.

> > > > >

> > > > > You clearly didn’t watch golf or view statistics during the turn of the century. He was the best driver on tour and it wasn’t even close.

> > > > >

> > > > > I’m so confused how people make these statements of supposed fact that are in no way based in reality. If you aren’t sure of something, don’t state your opinion as fact.

> > > > >

> > > > Tiger Woods was one of the longest driver of the golf ball, accuracy was never a strong suit. That fact, not opinion.

> > > > When Woods was coached by Butch Harmon, and consistently hitting 65-70% of the fairways, he owned Bay Hill, hoisting the trophy four straight times from 2000 to 2003. But in March of 2004, he began tweaking his swing with his new coach, Hank Haney, who espoused a flatter action that created an unintended byproduct — impaired driving. That year he went under the 60% mark, to 56.1% of fairways hit, 182nd out of 196 players on tour. Not surprisingly, he didn't win Bay Hill in 2004, and he hasn't since. **The low point came on Sunday last year, when Woods chipped out of the rough on 18 only to hit his third in the water on the way to a triple-bogey 7. He signed for a 76 (and a tie for 22nd place) and left the course without comment.**

> > > > I watched Plenty of golf in the 2000's....

> > >

> > > LOL! Woods finished 5th @ Bay Bay Hill last year shooting a final round 69. Appears you do not watch much golf at all.

> > >

> > > BTW your post above is a cut/paste job from and old article (2008).

> > > https://www.golf.com/tour-and-news/tiger-woods-one-wildest-drivers-tour-more-ever-2008-so-how-come-he-cant-stop-winning

> > Maybe you'll believe Butch Harmon

>

> I've never said a word about TW driving issues and don't care what Harmon had to say on it. I and others simply pointed out that you posted bad information about Tiger never winning Bay Hill after 2004 and TW shooting 76 at Bay Hill last year in the final round. You copied/pasted an 11 year old article and tried to pass it off as your own words in this thread. That much is factual.

That's not factual at all.....I never tried to pass it off as my own words, I just did want to do all that typing regarding his driving stats. Now, I would appreciate it if you quit trolling me. keep it moving sir

 

[PowderedToastMan]

> @Titleist99 said:

> > @grm24 said:

> > > @Titleist99 said:

> > > > @grm24 said:

> > > > > @Titleist99 said:

> > > > > > @PowderedToastMan said:

> > > > > > > @Titleist99 said:

> > > > > > > > @bladehunter said:

> > > > > > > > > @ksgolfcoach said:

> > > > > > > > > > @Railroading13 said:

> > > > > > > > > > The game will always be about how often you get the ball up and down from 150 yards and in - everything else - distance... is just hype

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Any stats to back this up?

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Just common sense. You can hit it in the weeds and get up and down and beat anybody. Or you can hit it in the fairway , hit greens and 2-3 putt only and beat nobody.

> > > > > > > Absolutely correct......a scrambling Tiger is fun to watch. Woods never was the best driver of the golf ball. He became a great player when he developed an arm swing with his wedges.....length is great but I would rather have a killer iron game.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > “Woods never was the best driver of the golf ball”.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > You clearly didn’t watch golf or view statistics during the turn of the century. He was the best driver on tour and it wasn’t even close.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I’m so confused how people make these statements of supposed fact that are in no way based in reality. If you aren’t sure of something, don’t state your opinion as fact.

> > > > > >

> > > > > Tiger Woods was one of the longest driver of the golf ball, accuracy was never a strong suit. That fact, not opinion.

> > > > > When Woods was coached by Butch Harmon, and consistently hitting 65-70% of the fairways, he owned Bay Hill, hoisting the trophy four straight times from 2000 to 2003. But in March of 2004, he began tweaking his swing with his new coach, Hank Haney, who espoused a flatter action that created an unintended byproduct — impaired driving. That year he went under the 60% mark, to 56.1% of fairways hit, 182nd out of 196 players on tour. Not surprisingly, he didn't win Bay Hill in 2004, and he hasn't since. **The low point came on Sunday last year, when Woods chipped out of the rough on 18 only to hit his third in the water on the way to a triple-bogey 7. He signed for a 76 (and a tie for 22nd place) and left the course without comment.**

> > > > > I watched Plenty of golf in the 2000's....

> > > >

> > > > LOL! Woods finished 5th @ Bay Bay Hill last year shooting a final round 69. Appears you do not watch much golf at all.

> > > >

> > > > BTW your post above is a cut/paste job from and old article (2008).

> > > > https://www.golf.com/tour-and-news/tiger-woods-one-wildest-drivers-tour-more-ever-2008-so-how-come-he-cant-stop-winning

> > > Maybe you'll believe Butch Harmon

> >

> > I've never said a word about TW driving issues and don't care what Harmon had to say on it. I and others simply pointed out that you posted bad information about Tiger never winning Bay Hill after 2004 and TW shooting 76 at Bay Hill last year in the final round. You copied/pasted an 11 year old article and tried to pass it off as your own words in this thread. That much is factual.

> That's not factual at all.....I never tried to pass it off as my own words, I just did want to do all that typing regarding his driving stats. Now, I would appreciate it if you quit trolling me. keep it moving sir

>

Wait a second... you think he’s trolling you?!

 

[grm24]

> @Titleist99 said:

> > @grm24 said:

> > > @Titleist99 said:

> > > > @grm24 said:

> > > > > @Titleist99 said:

> > > > > > @PowderedToastMan said:

> > > > > > > @Titleist99 said:

> > > > > > > > @bladehunter said:

> > > > > > > > > @ksgolfcoach said:

> > > > > > > > > > @Railroading13 said:

> > > > > > > > > > The game will always be about how often you get the ball up and down from 150 yards and in - everything else - distance... is just hype

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Any stats to back this up?

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Just common sense. You can hit it in the weeds and get up and down and beat anybody. Or you can hit it in the fairway , hit greens and 2-3 putt only and beat nobody.

> > > > > > > Absolutely correct......a scrambling Tiger is fun to watch. Woods never was the best driver of the golf ball. He became a great player when he developed an arm swing with his wedges.....length is great but I would rather have a killer iron game.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > “Woods never was the best driver of the golf ball”.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > You clearly didn’t watch golf or view statistics during the turn of the century. He was the best driver on tour and it wasn’t even close.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I’m so confused how people make these statements of supposed fact that are in no way based in reality. If you aren’t sure of something, don’t state your opinion as fact.

> > > > > >

> > > > > Tiger Woods was one of the longest driver of the golf ball, accuracy was never a strong suit. That fact, not opinion.

> > > > > When Woods was coached by Butch Harmon, and consistently hitting 65-70% of the fairways, he owned Bay Hill, hoisting the trophy four straight times from 2000 to 2003. But in March of 2004, he began tweaking his swing with his new coach, Hank Haney, who espoused a flatter action that created an unintended byproduct — impaired driving. That year he went under the 60% mark, to 56.1% of fairways hit, 182nd out of 196 players on tour. Not surprisingly, he didn't win Bay Hill in 2004, and he hasn't since. **The low point came on Sunday last year, when Woods chipped out of the rough on 18 only to hit his third in the water on the way to a triple-bogey 7. He signed for a 76 (and a tie for 22nd place) and left the course without comment.**

> > > > > I watched Plenty of golf in the 2000's....

> > > >

> > > > LOL! Woods finished 5th @ Bay Bay Hill last year shooting a final round 69. Appears you do not watch much golf at all.

> > > >

> > > > BTW your post above is a cut/paste job from and old article (2008).

> > > > https://www.golf.com/tour-and-news/tiger-woods-one-wildest-drivers-tour-more-ever-2008-so-how-come-he-cant-stop-winning

> > > Maybe you'll believe Butch Harmon

> >

> > I've never said a word about TW driving issues and don't care what Harmon had to say on it. I and others simply pointed out that you posted bad information about Tiger never winning Bay Hill after 2004 and TW shooting 76 at Bay Hill last year in the final round. You copied/pasted an 11 year old article and tried to pass it off as your own words in this thread. That much is factual.

> That's not factual at all.....I never tried to pass it off as my own words, I just did want to do all that typing regarding his driving stats. Now, I would appreciate it if you quit trolling me. keep it moving sir

>

No trolling. It appears you do not understand the definition of trolling. Everything I have posted directly to you in this thread is fact. Unlike your original "posts" to others. SOP is if you quote others work you provide a link back to those comments. You posted them as yours. Therefore people replied correctly to you and you have been owned.

[BeerPerHole]

Go Champ!

[Kevinnz]

Get rid of sean folley

[HackerD]

Among young players who are long off the tee and have a one-syllable last name I prefer Luke List.

[grm24]

> @"HackerD " said:

> Among young players who are long off the tee and have a one-syllable last name I prefer Luke List.

 

Is List at age 34 considered a young player?

[rukahs]

What's going on with this guy?? those are some poor numbers.

 

 

[Ferguson]

57 minutes ago, rukahs said:

What's going on with this guy?? those are some poor numbers.

 

 

 

 

 

He sucks. 

 

 

[MattyO1984]

Seems like a feast or famine guy! Either going great or going terrible and the terrible is much more common.

[RainShadow]

1 hour ago, Ferguson said:

 

 

 

He sucks. 

 

 

Correct. 

Seems like a nice kid.

Maybe he should go to the long drive tour.

[m d g]

I read his clubhead speed has dropped all the way to 138mph.

 

He's now hitting pitching wedges into par 5s instead of lob wedges.

 

That's a big adjustment...

[TiScape]

On 5/5/2019 at 7:02 PM, Steele47 said:

When he wore those different color from one another shoes,, I was all, "uh ooh". It's true. Just ask the gals at my hair salon.

I’m 99% sure he did that as an ode to racial equality. Not any kind of fashion statement. And don’t shoot the messenger 😊

[Steele47]

2 hours ago, TiScape said:

I’m 99% sure he did that as an ode to racial equality. Not any kind of fashion statement. And don’t shoot the messenger 😊

 

Gee.. ya think?