2018 Taylormade project (a)

245

Comments

  • jenglundjenglund JENGLU Members Posts: 25
    This is an excellent golf ball! In my opinion the best Taylormade ball since the TP Black. I am 51 years old with a swing speed around 95-97 on a day where my back is feeling good. The Project A just seems to fit my swing better than the TP5 for a few less dollars. As much as I like a few others like the Snell MTB Black and Encore Elixr, this ball just workIs better for me. It flys about 10 yards further off the tee and feels great with my irons and wedges. Putting is right on par with other good tour balls and it has a great feel off my Evenroll putter. My only dissapointment is that I did not try it sooner.



    Highly recommend for those with a swing speed in the 90s.
  • Tanner25Tanner25 Members Posts: 6,237 ✭✭
    jenglund wrote:


    This is an excellent golf ball! In my opinion the best Taylormade ball since the TP Black. I am 51 years old with a swing speed around 95-97 on a day where my back is feeling good. The Project A just seems to fit my swing better than the TP5 for a few less dollars. As much as I like a few others like the Snell MTB Black and Encore Elixr, this ball just workIs better for me. It flys about 10 yards further off the tee and feels great with my irons and wedges. Putting is right on par with other good tour balls and it has a great feel off my Evenroll putter. My only dissapointment is that I did not try it sooner.



    Highly recommend for those with a swing speed in the 90s.




    Have really enjoyed the performance of the prior gen A in yellow. The green side action is great. Is it worth experimenting with other similar balls, like Q Star Tour?
  • larciellarciel I play for eagle Members Posts: 2,282 ✭✭
    Tanner25 wrote:

    jenglund wrote:


    This is an excellent golf ball! In my opinion the best Taylormade ball since the TP Black. I am 51 years old with a swing speed around 95-97 on a day where my back is feeling good. The Project A just seems to fit my swing better than the TP5 for a few less dollars. As much as I like a few others like the Snell MTB Black and Encore Elixr, this ball just workIs better for me. It flys about 10 yards further off the tee and feels great with my irons and wedges. Putting is right on par with other good tour balls and it has a great feel off my Evenroll putter. My only dissapointment is that I did not try it sooner.



    Highly recommend for those with a swing speed in the 90s.




    Have really enjoyed the performance of the prior gen A in yellow. The green side action is great. Is it worth experimenting with other similar balls, like Q Star Tour?




    IMO (a) is much better ball than qst. More spin and softer feeling for me.





    Btw I just noticed that there is scratcher underneath the box of project a for Buy 4 get 1 1dz free promo. This was inside the bonus pack so it's technically buy 4dz get 2dz free!!



    Any there's now dad-ism promo so until fathers day it's buy 4dz get 3dz free!!!



  • Chef23Chef23 Members Posts: 129 ✭✭
    I have played a few rounds with the ball and it is ok but didn't really wow me. I am about 100 mph with the driver. I have generally played the ProV and prefer that ball still. For almost $20 a dozen less it is a very solid ball. I don't lose a lot of golf balls so the extra cost for balls doesn't worry me too much.
  • 1Mordrid11Mordrid1 Members Posts: 583 ✭✭
    Finally played the Project (a) this weekend. Started off with the Project (a), then since the course was wide open, I played it along side the QST. Both balls were great off of the driver. The Project (a) flew a little lower than the QST for me, but total distance they were very close. Feel was similar off of the driver. Ball flight was the only way I would be able to tell the 2 apart in a blind test. Off of the irons the balls felt similar but I was getting about 3-5 yards more carry from the QST. Both balls were stopping quickly on the green with full iron shots. On full wedge shots the QST had a little more spin for me. On 1/2 swing pitches the difference was minimal. Putting, once again they were very similar.



    IMO the Project (a) is a great ball for the price. If the QST was not already in my bag for my lower compression ball, the Project (a) would probably make it in my bag.
    WITB

    Callaway Rogue driver w/ Oban Tour Limited 4 60g
    Callaway Rogue 4 wood w/ Oban Kiyoshi White 4 65g
    Nike Sasquatch Sumo #4 hybrid(cut down 1") w/ H Diamana s
    Srixon U65 20° Miyazaki Kaula 7 s
    Ping G700 5-UW AWT 2.0(1°flat, 2° weak)
    Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind 19 54/ KBS Hi-Rev 2.0 115
    Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind 19 60/KBS Hi-Rev 2.0 115
    Ping Sigma 2 Tyne (adjusted to 32")
    Snell MTB Black
  • deadsolid...shankdeadsolid...shank ClubWRX Posts: 14,683 ClubWRX
    I haven’t played the new version yet, but have played the orders ones quite a bit.



    I love the feel of the ball across the board (driver, irons, putter), and think it performs well around the greens.



    But it seems a bit shorter off the tee for me. Enough so to be noticeable.
    Titleist 910 8.5
    Titleist 910 15*
    Titleist 910H 17*
    2-6 Mizuno MP-60, 7-PW MP-67
    SC GoLo
    Vokey SM5 52,58,62
  • third-times-a-charmthird-times-a-charm Members Posts: 1,535 ✭✭


    I haven’t played the new version yet, but have played the orders ones quite a bit.



    I love the feel of the ball across the board (driver, irons, putter), and think it performs well around the greens.



    But it seems a bit shorter off the tee for me. Enough so to be noticeable.




    Hit my longest drive yet with my new swing and a Project A this year, 244yds as per the cart's GPS. I used to be stuck around 220yds.



    Will test the A against more balls as I solidify this new swing, but for now it's a great ball and with the free sleeve promos I can't pass it up.
    Long Live Nike
  • deadsolid...shankdeadsolid...shank ClubWRX Posts: 14,683 ClubWRX



    I haven’t played the new version yet, but have played the orders ones quite a bit.



    I love the feel of the ball across the board (driver, irons, putter), and think it performs well around the greens.



    But it seems a bit shorter off the tee for me. Enough so to be noticeable.




    Hit my longest drive yet with my new swing and a Project A this year, 244yds as per the cart's GPS. I used to be stuck around 220yds.



    Will test the A against more balls as I solidify this new swing, but for now it's a great ball and with the free sleeve promos I can't pass it up.




    Definitely a good deal for a good ball.



    I don’t GPS distances so I never have exact numbers. Just know that one of the guys I play with on a regular basis is about 20 yards shorter on a consistent basis. After three tees shots that ended up closer than normal, he commented, “are you not catching it solid today, we’re closer together than normal”.



    I switched at the turn to a different ball and the normal gaps were back. Very scientific I know. ��



    I think it may spin just a little much for me with the driver, but I’m just guessing at that.
    Titleist 910 8.5
    Titleist 910 15*
    Titleist 910H 17*
    2-6 Mizuno MP-60, 7-PW MP-67
    SC GoLo
    Vokey SM5 52,58,62
  • third-times-a-charmthird-times-a-charm Members Posts: 1,535 ✭✭




    I haven’t played the new version yet, but have played the orders ones quite a bit.



    I love the feel of the ball across the board (driver, irons, putter), and think it performs well around the greens.



    But it seems a bit shorter off the tee for me. Enough so to be noticeable.




    Hit my longest drive yet with my new swing and a Project A this year, 244yds as per the cart's GPS. I used to be stuck around 220yds.



    Will test the A against more balls as I solidify this new swing, but for now it's a great ball and with the free sleeve promos I can't pass it up.




    Definitely a good deal for a good ball.



    I don’t GPS distances so I never have exact numbers. Just know that one of the guys I play with on a regular basis is about 20 yards shorter on a consistent basis. After three tees shots that ended up closer than normal, he commented, “are you not catching it solid today, we’re closer together than normal”.



    I switched at the turn to a different ball and the normal gaps were back. Very scientific I know. ��



    I think it may spin just a little much for me with the driver, but I’m just guessing at that.




    Spin is definitely a factor. This ball likes to spin which is good/bad depending on the golfer and the shot that's needed.



    My new swing is more through the ball, where as before I was hitting my drives on the upswing causing massive backspin. Probably is contributing to this distance.
    Long Live Nike
  • atomheartmotheratomheartmother Members Posts: 123
    From what I understand, there are three versions/generations of this ball: 2014, 2016, and 2018. Are the intervening odd years the same as the previous even year? How do you differentiate the models?



    I just got two dozen of the prior generation balls. They have the black (a) logo. They say 30% softer. But the date on the box says 2015. Are they the older, harder with more driver soon 2014 model or the newer (but not newest 2018) model that is softer with less driver spin? I’d assume the 2016 since it says 30% softer. But the date is 2015.
  • larciellarciel I play for eagle Members Posts: 2,282 ✭✭


    From what I understand, there are three versions/generations of this ball: 2014, 2016, and 2018. Are the intervening odd years the same as the previous even year? How do you differentiate the models?



    I just got two dozen of the prior generation balls. They have the black (a) logo. They say 30% softer. But the date on the box says 2015. Are they the older, harder with more driver soon 2014 model or the newer (but not newest 2018) model that is softer with less driver spin? I'd assume the 2016 since it says 30% softer. But the date is 2015.




    black (a) is 2014

    red (a) is 2016

    just <-(a)-> is current 2018 version.



    2014 is really not a good ball. Very hard feeling. 2016 is much better and 2018 has improved a bit, but not worth paying retail of $35 for. With current deal ($19/dz) though, I would buy 2018 version.



    I don't think Tmag spends much time/marketing on project a's. They release it with heavy promotion, then let it sit for 2 years.
  • atomheartmotheratomheartmother Members Posts: 123
    Are you sure the 2014 has a black (a) and the 2016 has the red? When googling reviews of each, it seems the opposite is true.
  • larciellarciel I play for eagle Members Posts: 2,282 ✭✭
    edited Jun 11, 2018 #44
    yes all my 16 version has (a) in red.. maybe I'm not sure.. played it way too long ago. I'll check once I go home



    this box is 14 version

    http://golfballrevie...spin-gravitron/



    https://www.everythi...KwaAjWXEALw_wcB

    this is 16
  • Tanner25Tanner25 Members Posts: 6,237 ✭✭
    Is cut gray or blue comparable to the Project a?
  • atomheartmotheratomheartmother Members Posts: 123
    Hmmm.



    This is a review of the 2014 version. It shows a red (a).



    http://www.golfalot.com/equipment-news/taylormade-project-a-ball-2719.aspx



    Here’s the 2016 version review. Shows a black (a).



    http://www.golfalot.com/equipment-reviews/taylormade-project-a-2016-golf-ball-review-3586.aspx





    What year was listed on the box of yours? Did the box day New and 30% softer core?
  • Tanner25Tanner25 Members Posts: 6,237 ✭✭
    larciel wrote:


    yes all my 16 version has (a) in red.. maybe I'm not sure.. played it way too long ago. I'll check once I go home



    this box is 14 version

    http://golfballrevie...spin-gravitron/



    https://www.everythi...KwaAjWXEALw_wcB

    this is 16




    Is the yellow A 2016'S?
  • atomheartmotheratomheartmother Members Posts: 123
    Actually, it looks like in the review of the 2016, it shows both...
  • Tanner25Tanner25 Members Posts: 6,237 ✭✭
    edited Jun 11, 2018 #49


    Hmmm.



    This is a review of the 2014 version. It shows a red (a).



    http://www.golfalot....-ball-2719.aspx



    Here's the 2016 version review. Shows a black (a).



    http://www.golfalot....eview-3586.aspx





    What year was listed on the box of yours? Did the box day New and 30% softer core?




    The second photo for the 16's shows a red a
  • larciellarciel I play for eagle Members Posts: 2,282 ✭✭
    Tanner25 wrote:


    Is cut gray or blue comparable to the Project a?




    neither are close to (a).. if anything grey is more comparable... I didn't like blue with shiny cover at all..





    the mystery of red or black (a) will be solved in 2 hours.. give me some time.. lol
  • atomheartmotheratomheartmother Members Posts: 123
    edited Jun 11, 2018 #51
    Tanner25 wrote:



    Hmmm.



    This is a review of the 2014 version. It shows a red (a).



    [url=&quot;http://www.golfalot.com/equipment-news/taylormade-project-a-ball-2719.aspx&quot;]http://www.golfalot....-ball-2719.aspx[/url]



    Here's the 2016 version review. Shows a black (a).



    [url=&quot;http://www.golfalot.com/equipment-reviews/taylormade-project-a-2016-golf-ball-review-3586.aspx&quot;]http://www.golfalot....eview-3586.aspx[/url]





    What year was listed on the box of yours? Did the box day New and 30% softer core?




    The second photo for the 16's shows a red a




    In two different photos, it showed one black and one red. My guess is that they pulled an older photo. I can only assume this since the 2014 review had balls with the red (a). So, either the photo was old (or of the old ball) or both the 2014 and 2016 versions have the red logo.
  • storm319storm319 Members Posts: 3,792 ✭✭
    edited Jun 11, 2018 #52
    Tanner25 wrote:



    Hmmm.



    This is a review of the 2014 version. It shows a red (a).



    http://www.golfalot....-ball-2719.aspx



    Here's the 2016 version review. Shows a black (a).



    http://www.golfalot....eview-3586.aspx





    What year was listed on the box of yours? Did the box day New and 30% softer core?




    The second photo for the 16's shows a red a




    2014 = red (a)

    2016 = black (a)



    Found a pic from a competing forum from 2014 with a ball cut in half containing the Red (a) stamp and lime green core.



    I still have a sleeve from TaylorMade's Project(a) giveaway in 2016. Black (a) stamp.



    Lastly here is Rick Shiels December 2017 review. Black (a) stamp and darker green core.



    [media]
  • third-times-a-charmthird-times-a-charm Members Posts: 1,535 ✭✭
    edited Jun 11, 2018 #53
    My sleeve I’m looking at right now says 2015 on the back, and it is all black ‘project a’



    My sleeve with 2018 on the back has a red ‘project a’ on the side of th balls



    2015:

    Long Live Nike
  • third-times-a-charmthird-times-a-charm Members Posts: 1,535 ✭✭


    My sleeve I’m looking at right now says 2015 on the back, and it is all black ‘project a’



    My sleeve with 2018 on the back has a red ‘project a’ on the side of th balls



    2015:




    Long Live Nike
  • larciellarciel I play for eagle Members Posts: 2,282 ✭✭
    Ok. 16 has black project a.



    18 should have only red a



    I guess 14 has project (a) with red a.



  • storm319storm319 Members Posts: 3,792 ✭✭



    My sleeve I'm looking at right now says 2015 on the back, and it is all black 'project a'



    My sleeve with 2018 on the back has a red 'project a' on the side of th balls



    2015:








    I have the same sleeve that TaylorMade sent as part of the 2nd gen promo in mid 2016. You will notice that one of the sides of the sleeve mentions a 40 compression number which was not included on the 2014 release packaging. Also the date likely points to the most current copywrite renewal year that TaylorMade had at the time that the packaging was printed.
  • TM Golf Ball ENGRTM Golf Ball ENGR TM Golf Ball ENGR Members Posts: 6
    edited Jun 11, 2018 #57
    storm319 wrote:




    My sleeve I'm looking at right now says 2015 on the back, and it is all black 'project a'



    My sleeve with 2018 on the back has a red 'project a' on the side of th balls



    2015:








    I have the same sleeve that TaylorMade sent as part of the 2nd gen promo in mid 2016. You will notice that one of the sides of the sleeve mentions a 40 compression number which was not included on the 2014 release packaging. Also the date likely points to the most current copywrite renewal year that TaylorMade had at the time that the packaging was printed.




    [background=transparent]Hey guys,[/background]



    [background=transparent]Thanks for giving the Project (a) a try and hopefully this helps:[/background]



    [background=transparent]Project (a) 2014-2015 (white only, sidestamp: Project (a), (a) in red): 85 compression ball (60comp core) designed for high spin for am’s into and around the green, also had higher iron/driver spin.[/background]



    [background=transparent]Project (a) 2016-2017 (white and yellow, sidestamp: Project (a), (a) in black): 70 compression ball (40comp core) designed to maintain greenside spin but with softer feel and slightly less iron/driver spin.[/background]



    [background=transparent]Project (a) 2018-2019 (white and yellow, sidestamp: <(a)> in red): 70 compression ball (35comp core), new material between core/cover, new cover and dimple pattern. Designed to maintain greenside spin and soft feel but significantly reduce driver/iron spin as well as improved aerodynamics for more distance and better performance in windy conditions.[/background]



    [background=transparent]Project (a) 2020? would love to hear your feedback on the 2018 version so we can incorporate into our development cycles.[/background]



    [background=transparent]Thanks[/background]
  • BiggErnBiggErn Members Posts: 2,339 ✭✭
    The seam on this ball is pretty discernible compared to other urethane balls.
  • Tanner25Tanner25 Members Posts: 6,237 ✭✭

    storm319 wrote:




    My sleeve I'm looking at right now says 2015 on the back, and it is all black 'project a'



    My sleeve with 2018 on the back has a red 'project a' on the side of th balls



    2015:








    I have the same sleeve that TaylorMade sent as part of the 2nd gen promo in mid 2016. You will notice that one of the sides of the sleeve mentions a 40 compression number which was not included on the 2014 release packaging. Also the date likely points to the most current copywrite renewal year that TaylorMade had at the time that the packaging was printed.




    [background=transparent]Hey guys,[/background]



    [background=transparent]Thanks for giving the Project (a) a try and hopefully this helps:[/background]



    [background=transparent]Project (a) 2014-2015 (white only, sidestamp: Project (a), (a) in red): 85 compression ball (60comp core) designed for high spin for am’s into and around the green, also had higher iron/driver spin.[/background]



    [background=transparent]Project (a) 2016-2017 (white and yellow, sidestamp: Project (a), (a) in black): 70 compression ball (40comp core) designed to maintain greenside spin but with softer feel and slightly less iron/driver spin.[/background]



    [background=transparent]Project (a) 2018-2019 (white and yellow, sidestamp: <(a)> in red): 70 compression ball (35comp core), new material between core/cover, new cover and dimple pattern. Designed to maintain greenside spin and soft feel but significantly reduce driver/iron spin as well as improved aerodynamics for more distance and better performance in windy conditions.[/background]



    [background=transparent]Project (a) 2020? would love to hear your feedback on the 2018 version so we can incorporate into our development cycles.[/background]



    [background=transparent]Thanks[/background]




    Welcome, TM Golf Ball ENGR. It's nice to have an expert on the site. Would you agree the 16 A in yellow has a greenish tint to it? How does the 18 A in yellow differ? Tanner
  • third-times-a-charmthird-times-a-charm Members Posts: 1,535 ✭✭




    [background=transparent]Project (a) 2020? would love to hear your feedback on the 2018 version so we can incorporate into our development cycles.[/background]



    [background=transparent]Thanks[/background]




    Incorporate some low-flight characteristics into this ball like Titleist did with the AVX. If the Project A was the same price in 2020 with all the same characteristics of the current ball - PLUS low-flight trajectory it would literally be the best ball ever made.
    Long Live Nike
  • larciellarciel I play for eagle Members Posts: 2,282 ✭✭




    [background=transparent]Hey guys,[/background]



    [background=transparent]Thanks for giving the Project (a) a try and hopefully this helps:[/background]



    [background=transparent]Project (a) 2014-2015 (white only, sidestamp: Project (a), (a) in red): 85 compression ball (60comp core) designed for high spin for am’s into and around the green, also had higher iron/driver spin.[/background]



    [background=transparent]Project (a) 2016-2017 (white and yellow, sidestamp: Project (a), (a) in black): 70 compression ball (40comp core) designed to maintain greenside spin but with softer feel and slightly less iron/driver spin.[/background]



    [background=transparent]Project (a) 2018-2019 (white and yellow, sidestamp: <(a)> in red): 70 compression ball (35comp core), new material between core/cover, new cover and dimple pattern. Designed to maintain greenside spin and soft feel but significantly reduce driver/iron spin as well as improved aerodynamics for more distance and better performance in windy conditions.[/background]



    [background=transparent]Project (a) 2020? would love to hear your feedback on the 2018 version so we can incorporate into our development cycles.[/background]



    [background=transparent]Thanks[/background]




    As a project (a) fan who used every version, this is very welcome to see Tmag listening to users directly.



    To me, 2016 version is very good but feels bit EMPTY when hit. 2018ver, so far has been better in terms of that. but I only played 2 rounds with it. Will report back.



    For 2020 version, I don't agree that you need to keep the launch lower. This is geared for amateurs and they need the launch.
Sign In or Register to comment.