Titleist PICTURES !! 720 Irons T100 / T200 / T300 Spy Pics from Poults inside

[GoGoErky]

CB and t100 going to start blurring lines and maybe titleist combines them next time around

[BostonWRX]

CB is sharp

[geedub.2008]

A full set of the MBs is extremely tempting

[MisterMittens]

Am I seeing things, or are the MBs and CBs stamped with 820?

 

Seems curious to move away from 720 since the hybrids and woods moved away from 820/919.

[molecularman]

Those mbs look fantastic. So clean.

[MisterMittens]

> @MisterMittens said:

> Am I seeing things, or are the MBs and CBs stamped with 820?

>

> Seems curious to move away from 720 since the hybrids and woods moved away from 820/919.

 

Nevermind. Looks like 620, which would make more sense.

[QuigleyDU]

I am all for a clean looking blade, I am just curious what is different from the previous release. I can’t really tell. Other than no MB stamp on it.

[pr1mo990]

> @MisterMittens said:

> Am I seeing things, or are the MBs and CBs stamped with 820?

>

> Seems curious to move away from 720 since the hybrids and woods moved away from 820/919.

 

They're 620's actually, based on Titleist's email. I'm not following why they went 620 but maybe someone else knows.

 

That bag full of MBs looks sweet!!

[MisterMittens]

> @pr1mo990 said:

> > @MisterMittens said:

> > Am I seeing things, or are the MBs and CBs stamped with 820?

> >

> > Seems curious to move away from 720 since the hybrids and woods moved away from 820/919.

>

> They're 620's actually, based on Titleist's email. I'm not following why they went 620 but maybe someone else knows.

>

> That bag full of MBs looks sweet!!

 

Yeah, I caught it after zooming in again.

 

Seemed odd that they would move irons to 8** since hybrids used to have that designation, so it made me take a second look.

[molecularman]

> @QuigleyDU said:

> I am all for a clean looking blade, I am just curious what is different from the previous release. I can’t really tell. Other than no MB stamp on it.

 

To my eye, the muscle back aspect looks shorter (up and down). It could just be where they placed the Titleist script, but on the 716s, there is more muscle back between the logo. So it looks like they have potentially moved more weight lower on the face?

Either way - it's a forged muscle back, the same as every other forged muscle back. But they do look nice :smiley:

[QuigleyDU]

> @molecularman said:

> > @QuigleyDU said:

> > I am all for a clean looking blade, I am just curious what is different from the previous release. I can’t really tell. Other than no MB stamp on it.

>

> To my eye, the muscle back aspect looks shorter (up and down). It could just be where they placed the Titleist script, but on the 716s, there is more muscle back between the logo. So it looks like they have potentially moved more weight lower on the face?

> Either way - it's a forged muscle back, the same as every other forged muscle back. But they do look nice :smiley:

 

Thats pretty much what I see. It looks good, I am not knocking it. I just want more info.

[Gunslinger.]

Looks like it says "820 FORGED"

Maybe the 820 portion refers to the forging process and not necessarily the model number.

[Golfingfanatic]

MBs are lovely.

[bogeypro]

So they named the new irons after a crappy Toyota t100 truck? Awesome.

 

I’m not understanding what titleist is up to the last year or two. I’m not sure they are either...

[HappyGilmore22]

CBs look really good but I'm a long time AP2 player so would go for the T100's. Don't really like the look as much as the 718 AP2's, mostly since the T100 badge looks tacky the way it is. Will wait for in person pictures and hope they look better then like most irons do.

[Stanks]

> @bogeypro said:

> So they named the new irons after a crappy Toyota t100 truck? Awesome.

>

> I’m not understanding what titleist is up to the last year or two. I’m not sure they are either...

 

You must be the fun guy at parties...

 

Irons look nice

 

[bogeypro]

> @Stanks said:

> > @bogeypro said:

> > So they named the new irons after a crappy Toyota t100 truck? Awesome.

> >

> > I’m not understanding what titleist is up to the last year or two. I’m not sure they are either...

>

> You must be the fun guy at parties...

>

> Irons look nice

>

 

My brutal honesty makes me a hit a parties.

[JoeJoeJoeUrBoat]

Mb/Cb set would look filthy in the bag... Hmmmmm...

[MizunoMac72]

> @"Gunslinger." said:

> Looks like it says "820 FORGED"

> Maybe the 820 portion refers to the forging process and not necessarily the model number.

 

It refers to the new model number 620MB & 620CB

 

 

 

 

 

[Jarlaxle]

By giving the MB and CB their own distinct series (620) I think this could mean things will evolve such that those irons get updated independently from the "T#00" line in the future. Sort of like how Mizuno treats the MP and JPX releases separately now.

 

Having seen a few pics including the ones in the flesh here on GolfWRX, I gotta say I'm most intrigued by the new CB. Looks like a fairly significant update while the T100 seems very close to the current AP2, at least on first blush.

[GoGoErky]

> @Jarlaxle said:

> By giving the MB and CB their own distinct series (620) I think this could mean things will evolve such that those irons get updated independently from the "T#00" line in the future. Sort of like how Mizuno treats the MP and JPX releases separately now.

>

> Having seen a few pics including the ones in the flesh here on GolfWRX, I gotta say I'm most intrigued by the new CB. Looks like a fairly significant update while the T100 seems very close to the current AP2, at least on first blush.

 

Other than using the year in the release they were separate from the ap line already. While titleist is changing a lot of things I can see them completely changing release cycles. Granted they’ve added new drivers in “middle” of a release cycle but I just can’t see them updating cb and mb separate from the rest of the iron lineup

[geesecougar2]

Nice. Now just need to see what Mizuno has up their sleeves!

[HappyGilmore22]

The more I see the CB the more I like them they are so good. The forum home page has great in person pictures of the T100's and they look like a really ugly version of the 718 AP2s. Not too thrilled after seeing those pictures.

[randy4]

The mb look amazing. Cb look really good as well. Might go into a split set of those if I decide to get some new sticks. I do not like the backs of the t100 irons.

[MisterMittens]

> @MizunoMac72 said:

> > @"Gunslinger." said:

> > Looks like it says "820 FORGED"

> > Maybe the 820 portion refers to the forging process and not necessarily the model number.

>

> It refers to the new model number 620MB & 620CB

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

 

Kind of has a little Ping i210 flair to it, which is a good thing IMO.

 

Will certainly put these up against my P760's and see what wins.

[JonnyKrasnodar]

Those CBs are absolutely stunning. Might be tempted to give Titleist a go for the first time. Wow.

[eyeeye]

Are people gonna stamp snowflakes on that MB now? Would be nice if Titleist offered it like they do it with Vokeys

[Stanks]

It might just be glare or something but, is there a discoloration in the toe? Could it be a tungsten insert or weighting? I'd assume a rousing "No" but, wouldn't be shocked.

[Kylekoz17]

Seems general consensus is the back of t100 is a big step back from 718 ap2. Definitely in agreement there. The big gray part in the middle makes it look clunky and off

[jblough99]

Am I the only one that thinks the CB’s look far worse than the 716 and 718 CB’s? They just look cheap to me. Had a set of 718s and these are a big step backwards in the looks dept. Not saying these won’t perform as I’m sure they will, probably will have a bump in MOI vs the older models, just not sure about the looks.