Titleist T150s are gonna be all-timers

[MtlJeff]

1 hour ago, MelloYello said:

 

It seems that most people pick up 5 yards of carry but give away 500rpms of spin. 

 

To me, it seems like the spin could be more important in an iron when we talk about playing real golf from shots out of the rough to shot-making, etc. 

 

What are you thoughts on the T100 vs T150 from a practical perspective? It seems to me the 150 is sort of a 100 that's been optimized on a launch monitor. 

 

Will the 150 prove a real winner, you think? Everybody that talks it up really just highlights the distance which (as I'm sure you can understand) makes me a bit concerned. 

 

I will need to get on a trackman to speak in detail about the spin, and the one near me closes for the summers unfortunately. 

 

I am definitely getting good spin though. At least when also factoring in launch. I spun back a 9 iron for example from about 148 today which i never do. My ball marks today were also all craters, which is usually not the case for me as my descent angle is less especially with 659s. So i think it's possible my spin is the same or lower, but my descent angle is so much better it doesn't matter

 

I think these are gonna sell incredibly well. 2-3 others at my club have already ordered just upon seeing mine , we haven't even done demo days yet. The combo of clean looks, good feel, great launch and a mid-small size i think will appeal to basically anyone <12 cap basically. 

 

The 100 i think is too intimidating for most guys. The topline is basically a blade

[MtlJeff]

17 hours ago, LowAndLeft32 said:

Nice review. How would you rate the feel?

 

Is there an iron that you think compares the most to the t150? 
 

Thanks. 
 

 

 

Sorry i think i missed this---The feel is good---I wouldn't say it's as "soft" as say my 0317ST , it's a bit clickier....However that is not necessarily a bad thing, as sometimes i found my 0317s were almost so quiet as to be a bit dull

 

The T150s have a clicky thwakiness to them. 

 

It's hard to find a comp---The 2024 Apex Pro seems like it will certainly be one but it's not out yet for me to really see. Also the JPX923 Tour probably is similar but it's not available lefty. 

 

t150 is smaller then ZX7, smaller than I230.....but bigger than clubs like TCB, P7MC etc.

[vreek]

I think I'd love the T150 in terms of shape, profile and forgiveness, but does anyone have concerns about the relatively strong lofts? I'd be looking at a 8* difference between the set 48* gap wedge and my 56*.

[suprfli6]

Did you look into a combo set with either the t100 or t200? I’m planning on hitting them all and really don’t have any idea which I’ll end up with.

[MtlJeff]

1 hour ago, vreek said:

I think I'd love the T150 in terms of shape, profile and forgiveness, but does anyone have concerns about the relatively strong lofts? I'd be looking at a 8* difference between the set 48* gap wedge and my 56*.

 

I use 54-60 wedge combo FWIW

[MtlJeff]

42 minutes ago, suprfli6 said:

Did you look into a combo set with either the t100 or t200? I’m planning on hitting them all and really don’t have any idea which I’ll end up with.

 

I didn't no, i've heard great things about the last gen T200 and i assume this one will be awesome....but it wasn't really for me

[C_rad]

1 minute ago, MtlJeff said:

 

I didn't no, i've heard great things about the last gen T200 and i assume this one will be awesome....but it wasn't really for me

Can you compare them to the pro223?

[MtlJeff]

2 minutes ago, C_rad said:

Can you compare them to the pro223?

 

No I've never hit those sorry, we never have Mizuno demo days anymore. Wish I could be more help

[CasualLie]

So torn between T150 and Apex CB.  Really want to find a way to prefer T150, but I'm suspecting the softer feel of the Apex CB is going to be the tiebreaker.

[cardoustie]

In my fitting I loved the turf interaction with the 150’s … your thoughts ?

[MtlJeff]

23 minutes ago, cardoustie said:

In my fitting I loved the turf interaction with the 150’s … your thoughts ?

 

So far so good, but only played 27 holes on grass so far! I would say I haven't really noticed it , I'm taking normal divots for me (small) and coming through the ball nicely, definitely no complaints 

[cmatthews77]

I haven’t seen these in person yet and I’m sure they’ll be super solid but I was disappointed to see the loft package. They sort of stated “if you missed the AP2 this is your iron” but then the strong loft package with a 44 deg PW that I’m not a fan of (maybe in 5 more years). If these were 46 or 45 degree Pw down I’d be apt to test because I was always interested in T100. 
 

I guess this is a good thing because I’m happy with my MP223

[Pens #1 fan]

On 8/25/2023 at 9:25 PM, Tommyboi95 said:

Only hit the 4i in the 150, saw some really solid ball speed numbers. For me, really cut through the turf very nicely. (I struggle w/ turf interaction w thicker soles. zx7s t200 etc.) Currently play 0317 STs, but it’ll be a shootout come January Apex CB/MB, 7MC/MB and t150/100. 
 

may the best iron win!

I might start a thread this, not trying to hijack. But when you this shootout, what iron do you test 7i, other, whole sets? Are they all same exact specs. 
 

Went up to DSG to see Titleist sets in person, of course they received 350 . Ended up hitting 7i in T200,150,100s. 150 is barely bigger than 100s, sole is wider for sure, but everything else close. Feel was very similar, numbers close, of course I didn’t hit any really good ones. Maybe ball speed slightly higher on 150. I could easy play a full set. T200 was good, definitely higher ball speeds on mishits. Looks are not bad at all, I could play a full set of those as well. They do not look big at all. The full set of 350 looked like you think. After playing those BB21 though I could play a whole set of those. I’ve read where guys are using the 4i in 350 as driving iron. Not sure what I will do. 

[MelloYello]

I'm not sure the T150 serves as much of a purpose as some claim it does (for low handicappers). Titleist has achieved distance by hitting the intermediate spots WRT ball speed & spin. And they've compensated for what would be a slight loss in launch angle with a slightly lower CG to balance peak height with that of T100. 

 

So, they've successfully turned your 7-8-9 iron into a 6.5-7.5-8.5. However, how much of that is just optimizing for launch monitor sessions (i.e. full swings on fairway lies)? Titleist fitters are pointing hard at the improved distance and saying, 'hey, you're not losing height so this is objectively better.' And there's no doubt the public (at least the people making big swings on launch monitors) are buying into this. 

 

But I think it's a little more complicated. The T150 has the same blade length & offset as the T100 so it's "confidence-inspiring" look comes almost entirely from the (marginally) thicker topline. Okay, but few in the crowd that were opting for T100 over CB/MB were complaining that T100 wasn't big enough. The purpose of T100 was to preserve the tour-preferred CB aesthetic. And if T150 has the same blade length & offset, how much is really being accomplished by that topline, particularly if the lofts are noticeably stronger? 

 

Personally, I would notice the loft as a negative every bit as much as I'd notice the "confidence-inspiring" topline. If the blade length isn't longer on the T150, it'd be a wash to me at which point the only real selling point of the T150 would be the added distance...but who asked for that and what does it really do for the low-index golfer?  

 

This might rattle some cages but I would call the T150 the "player's" alternative to the T200.

 

Likewise, I would relate the T100 to the CB the same way with the CB being a "traditional" version of the T100. As an aside, if the T100 and CB are aimed at the same player, we can notice how much more popular the inclusion of tech is in the T100 with the CB being selected by only a few purists. 

 

*I think* we'll find a lot of these T100 guys who are grabbing the T150 for the "free distance" may come back next year complaining about a lot of practical issues just as if they were to have gamed a T200. I suspect we'll hear about gapping issues, limited ability to manipulate trajectory & spin, loss in (manipulated) distance control, less-than-desirable spin from outside the fairway, etc. 

 

These same issues inevitably arise when you start playing the stronger-lofts-lower-CG game. 

 

In other words, these guys won't be able to go to the world of T150/T200 without paying a price for that distance which Trackman and GC Quad said they were going to get for "free." It's all fine and dandy to make the trade-off in the longer irons, but what low-index golfer is asking for the extra distance of high-launch & low-spin in their short irons? 

 

What gives me pause about the T150 is that it's really designed to win in the arena of launch monitors and so much content today is driven by full-swing-only sessions. I'm not convinced that your average T100/CB player is really dying to give up what they'll have to for another half-club of short-iron distance (on full swings) but hey, I'm ready to admit that Titleist has done as much as they can to challenge that. 

 

All I'm saying is that we've been down this path before and while it's relatively new for Titleist, all they've really done here is to extend the "distance at all costs" mentality into something that's the same general size of the T100.

 

Will that new approach be popular? Well, personally, I think the guys who want the distance are going to prefer the T200 for it's size, sole and launch. I don't think the player who wants distance is really asking Titleist to please shrink the T200 down to match the T100/CB but that's just my opinion on it. 🙂

 

I know guys who play the T200 and they wouldn't want their clubs shrunk down to the size of a T150/T100. And I know the T100/CB guys and they don't want to play the high-launch/low-spin thing in their scoring irons. 

 

So personally, outside of guys staring at full swing data on Trackman, I'm not sure who the T150 really helps. Maybe the guy who doesn't hit his T100 far enough? I guess?

 

If the Vokey design is considered acceptable in the Gw, why are we obsessing about raw power on the 8-9-Pw? Shouldn't the added stability in the T100/CB be sufficient? The T100/CB are certainly much more stable than the Vokey which sits right next to it in the bag!

 

It just doesn't make sense why a player would want a Vokey Gw and then all of a sudden shift to a completely different mindset seeking pure power with the very next club in the bag, especially when it's going to come at a cost. 

 

There's going to be a penalty for all this distance. Shot-making in the short-irons is going to suffer with strong lofts and low-spin heads and to me, that's antithetical to the low-index's objective of scoring.  

 

.

Edited August 27, 2023 by MelloYello

[Pnwpingi210]

7 minutes ago, MelloYello said:

I'm not sure the T150 serves as much of a purpose as some claim it does (for low handicappers). Titleist has achieved distance by hitting the intermediate spots WRT ball speed & spin. And they've compensated for what would be a slight loss in launch angle with a slightly lower CG to balance peak height with that of T100. 

 

So, they've successfully turned your 7-8-9 iron into a 6.5-7.5-8.5. However, how much of that is just optimizing for launch monitor sessions (i.e. full swings on fairway lies)? Titleist fitters are pointing hard at the improved distance and saying, 'hey, you're not losing height so this is objectively better.' And there's no doubt the public (at least the people staring at launch monitor results) are buying this. 

 

But I think it's a little more complicated. The T150 has the same blade length & offset as the T100 so it's "confidence-inspiring" look comes almost entirely from the (marginally) thicker topline. Okay, but few in the crowd that were opting for T100 over CB/MB were complaining that T100 wasn't big enough. The purpose of T100 was to preserve the tour-preferred CB aesthetic. And if T150 has the same blade length & offset, how much is really being accomplished by that topline, particularly if the lofts are noticeably stronger? 

 

Personally, I would notice the loft as a negative every bit as much as I'd notice the "confidence-inspiring" topline. If the blade length isn't longer on the T150, it's a wash to me and the only real selling point of the T150 is the distance...but who asked for that? 

 

This might rattle some cages but I would call the T150 the "player's" alternative to the T200.

 

Likewise, I would relate the T100 to the CB the same way with the CB being a "traditional" version of the T100. As an aside, we can notice how much more popular the inclusive of tech is in the T100 versus the "traditional" CB approach.  

 

*I think* we'll find a lot of these T100 guys who are grabbing the T150 for the "free distance" may come back next year complaining about a lot of practical issues just as if they were to have gamed a T200. I suspect we'll hear about gapping issues, limited ability to manipulate trajectory & spin, loss in (manipulated) distance control, less-than-desirable spin from outside the fairway, etc. 

 

These same issues inevitably arise when you start playing the stronger-lofts-lower-CG game. 

 

In other words, these guys won't be able to go to the world of T150/T200 without paying a price for that distance which Trackman and GC Quad said they were going to get for "free."

 

What gives me pause about the T150 is that it's really designed to win in the arena of launch monitors and so much content today is driven by full-swing-only sessions. I'm not convinced that your average T100/CB player is really dying to give up what they'll have to for another half-club in distance on full swings but hey, I'm ready to admit that Titleist has done as much as they can to challenge that. 

 

.

You articulated my experience with this new t series. 
 

I’ve also found that I don’t mind losing a bit of distance on miss hits.  Miss hits that Pin high but off the green left or right is generally in some gnarly rough or not great sand on the courses I play and are less predictable.  Mishits that are short left or right of the green are generally in the fairway, fringe, or first cut and give me the confidence I can get up and down in two from that position.

 

im curious to see the tour adoptions.  Seems like the mb, cb have had the most success on tour the last 12-24 months, with the t100 being absent in the winners circle with the exception of a few long irons.  Ap2s and 2019 version seem to pop up a bit more often.  Granted this data set is of little comparison to us amateurs.

[MtlJeff]

3 hours ago, MelloYello said:

I'm not sure the T150 serves as much of a purpose as some claim it does (for low handicappers). Titleist has achieved distance by hitting the intermediate spots WRT ball speed & spin. And they've compensated for what would be a slight loss in launch angle with a slightly lower CG to balance peak height with that of T100. 

 

So, they've successfully turned your 7-8-9 iron into a 6.5-7.5-8.5. However, how much of that is just optimizing for launch monitor sessions (i.e. full swings on fairway lies)? Titleist fitters are pointing hard at the improved distance and saying, 'hey, you're not losing height so this is objectively better.' And there's no doubt the public (at least the people making big swings on launch monitors) are buying into this. 

 

But I think it's a little more complicated. The T150 has the same blade length & offset as the T100 so it's "confidence-inspiring" look comes almost entirely from the (marginally) thicker topline. Okay, but few in the crowd that were opting for T100 over CB/MB were complaining that T100 wasn't big enough. The purpose of T100 was to preserve the tour-preferred CB aesthetic. And if T150 has the same blade length & offset, how much is really being accomplished by that topline, particularly if the lofts are noticeably stronger? 

 

Personally, I would notice the loft as a negative every bit as much as I'd notice the "confidence-inspiring" topline. If the blade length isn't longer on the T150, it'd be a wash to me at which point the only real selling point of the T150 would be the added distance...but who asked for that and what does it really do for the low-index golfer?  

 

This might rattle some cages but I would call the T150 the "player's" alternative to the T200.

 

Likewise, I would relate the T100 to the CB the same way with the CB being a "traditional" version of the T100. As an aside, if the T100 and CB are aimed at the same player, we can notice how much more popular the inclusion of tech is in the T100 with the CB being selected by only a few purists. 

 

*I think* we'll find a lot of these T100 guys who are grabbing the T150 for the "free distance" may come back next year complaining about a lot of practical issues just as if they were to have gamed a T200. I suspect we'll hear about gapping issues, limited ability to manipulate trajectory & spin, loss in (manipulated) distance control, less-than-desirable spin from outside the fairway, etc. 

 

These same issues inevitably arise when you start playing the stronger-lofts-lower-CG game. 

 

In other words, these guys won't be able to go to the world of T150/T200 without paying a price for that distance which Trackman and GC Quad said they were going to get for "free." It's all fine and dandy to make the trade-off in the longer irons, but what low-index golfer is asking for the extra distance of high-launch & low-spin in their short irons? 

 

What gives me pause about the T150 is that it's really designed to win in the arena of launch monitors and so much content today is driven by full-swing-only sessions. I'm not convinced that your average T100/CB player is really dying to give up what they'll have to for another half-club of short-iron distance (on full swings) but hey, I'm ready to admit that Titleist has done as much as they can to challenge that. 

 

All I'm saying is that we've been down this path before and while it's relatively new for Titleist, all they've really done here is to extend the "distance at all costs" mentality into something that's the same general size of the T100.

 

Will that new approach be popular? Well, personally, I think the guys who want the distance are going to prefer the T200 for it's size, sole and launch. I don't think the player who wants distance is really asking Titleist to please shrink the T200 down to match the T100/CB but that's just my opinion on it. 🙂

 

I know guys who play the T200 and they wouldn't want their clubs shrunk down to the size of a T150/T100. And I know the T100/CB guys and they don't want to play the high-launch/low-spin thing in their scoring irons. 

 

So personally, outside of guys staring at full swing data on Trackman, I'm not sure who the T150 really helps. Maybe the guy who doesn't hit his T100 far enough? I guess?

 

If the Vokey design is considered acceptable in the Gw, why are we obsessing about raw power on the 8-9-Pw? Shouldn't the added stability in the T100/CB be sufficient? The T100/CB are certainly much more stable than the Vokey which sits right next to it in the bag!

 

It just doesn't make sense why a player would want a Vokey Gw and then all of a sudden shift to a completely different mindset seeking pure power with the very next club in the bag, especially when it's going to come at a cost. 

 

There's going to be a penalty for all this distance. Shot-making in the short-irons is going to suffer with strong lofts and low-spin heads and to me, that's antithetical to the low-index's objective of scoring.  

 

.

 

I'll need to get on a trackman as i mentioned earlier to comment more on spin but i feel like i'm spinning the ball a decent amount, shaft naturally has a lot to do with that. 

 

These are not much more stronger lofted (usually 1 degree) than my 659CB which have a thinner sole and topline. I could do without strong lofts , it isn't necessary for me....but i don't begrudge it too much either it i have appropriate spacing and generally go from 21-50 degrees in increments of 8 irons. 

 

What i love about the T150 is it's a bit bigger than my 659, launches higher with similar launch and shaft, and goes further. And it feels better....

 

I'm a really good player, but finding good launch in 4,5,6 irons is always a challenge because i don't hit it high, and i don't want to use a soft , high spin shaft. I also have become more of a fan of mid-small heads in recent years. 

 

So something that looks nice and launches high with KBS tour, Modus 120 or PX LZ is very appealing to me. I probably could use the T100 without much issue but the topline to me looked noticeably smaller. Smaller than my 659 or 0317ST which are about the fringe of what i am willing to play

[SwooshLT]

21 minutes ago, MtlJeff said:

 

I'll need to get on a trackman as i mentioned earlier to comment more on spin but i feel like i'm spinning the ball a decent amount, shaft naturally has a lot to do with that. 

 

These are not much more stronger lofted (usually 1 degree) than my 659CB which have a thinner sole and topline. I could do without strong lofts , it isn't necessary for me....but i don't begrudge it too much either it i have appropriate spacing and generally go from 21-50 degrees in increments of 8 irons. 

 

What i love about the T150 is it's a bit bigger than my 659, launches higher with similar launch and shaft, and goes further. And it feels better....

 

I'm a really good player, but finding good launch in 4,5,6 irons is always a challenge because i don't hit it high, and i don't want to use a soft , high spin shaft. I also have become more of a fan of mid-small heads in recent years. 

 

So something that looks nice and launches high with KBS tour, Modus 120 or PX LZ is very appealing to me. I probably could use the T100 without much issue but the topline to me looked noticeably smaller. Smaller than my 659 or 0317ST which are about the fringe of what i am willing to play

 

Saying this lefty, have you tried i230s? I'm slower and lower launch than you yet find the long irons are stupid easy to elevate!!! 

[hammergolf]

1 hour ago, MtlJeff said:

 

I'll need to get on a trackman as i mentioned earlier to comment more on spin but i feel like i'm spinning the ball a decent amount, shaft naturally has a lot to do with that. 

 

These are not much more stronger lofted (usually 1 degree) than my 659CB which have a thinner sole and topline. I could do without strong lofts , it isn't necessary for me....but i don't begrudge it too much either it i have appropriate spacing and generally go from 21-50 degrees in increments of 8 irons. 

 

What i love about the T150 is it's a bit bigger than my 659, launches higher with similar launch and shaft, and goes further. And it feels better....

 

I'm a really good player, but finding good launch in 4,5,6 irons is always a challenge because i don't hit it high, and i don't want to use a soft , high spin shaft. I also have become more of a fan of mid-small heads in recent years. 

 

So something that looks nice and launches high with KBS tour, Modus 120 or PX LZ is very appealing to me. I probably could use the T100 without much issue but the topline to me looked noticeably smaller. Smaller than my 659 or 0317ST which are about the fringe of what i am willing to play

Here you go…

 

https://www.ebay.com/itm/195935515304?chn=ps&norover=1&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-117182-37290-0&mkcid=2&mkscid=101&itemid=195935515304&targetid=1587268788857&device=c&mktype=pla&googleloc=9013809&poi=&campaignid=19894961968&mkgroupid=148855406073&rlsatarget=pla-1587268788857&abcId=9307911&merchantid=7933894&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIytbbneP9gAMVv4FaBR1g0wsEEAQYAyABEgIlv_D_BwE

[MtlJeff]

10 minutes ago, hammergolf said:

Here you go…

 

https://www.ebay.com/itm/195935515304?chn=ps&norover=1&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-117182-37290-0&mkcid=2&mkscid=101&itemid=195935515304&targetid=1587268788857&device=c&mktype=pla&googleloc=9013809&poi=&campaignid=19894961968&mkgroupid=148855406073&rlsatarget=pla-1587268788857&abcId=9307911&merchantid=7933894&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIytbbneP9gAMVv4FaBR1g0wsEEAQYAyABEgIlv_D_BwE

 

They available lefty? 

[SwooshLT]

31 minutes ago, MtlJeff said:

 

They available lefty? 

 

Yes ....had a set 10-15yrs ago

[bnp144]

I took mine out today after receiving yesterday. I ordered after just looking at a demo club. Shafted with modus 120. I’ve been playing zx7 with the same shaft for 2 years now. 
 

The front 9 I only got to hit them a few times. The PW had me all confused. I was launching lower with a definite penetrating line. I had on a few occasions hit an extra ball to confirm my flight. My distances compared to my zx7 were all over the place. 
 

Back 9, finally figured them out (within reason). Got the flight slightly better but still lower than my zx7. I am guessing that would be the lofts being stronger by a degree or 2. 
 

All in all, they are enjoyable for sure. I need to get a few more rounds on them. Looks are fantastic. My only adjustment may be getting a new PW or bending it a few degrees weak. 

[MtlJeff]

2 hours ago, SwooshLT said:

 

Saying this lefty, have you tried i230s? I'm slower and lower launch than you yet find the long irons are stupid easy to elevate!!! 

 

I strongly considered the I230. I have hit them at a few demo days. There's no real reason why I wouldn't get them other than I preferred the feel of the Titleists just a bit, and they were also a bit smaller which I was OK with. 

 

Honestly the I230 was probably my #2 choice. 

[Sean124]

2 hours ago, bnp144 said:

I took mine out today after receiving yesterday. I ordered after just looking at a demo club. Shafted with modus 120. I’ve been playing zx7 with the same shaft for 2 years now. 
 

The front 9 I only got to hit them a few times. The PW had me all confused. I was launching lower with a definite penetrating line. I had on a few occasions hit an extra ball to confirm my flight. My distances compared to my zx7 were all over the place. 
 

Back 9, finally figured them out (within reason). Got the flight slightly better but still lower than my zx7. I am guessing that would be the lofts being stronger by a degree or 2. 
 

All in all, they are enjoyable for sure. I need to get a few more rounds on them. Looks are fantastic. My only adjustment may be getting a new PW or bending it a few degrees weak. 

T100 PW, T150 4 iron stock at 22* and 5-9 bent 1* weak would be an awesome setup. 
 

Bonus: you can feel superior because your PW doesn’t have 44 stamped on it. 🤣

 

 

Edited August 28, 2023 by Sean124

[bnp144]

57 minutes ago, Sean124 said:

T100 PW, T150 4 iron stock at 22* and 5-9 bent 1* weak would be an awesome setup. 
 

Bonus: you can feel superior because your PW doesn’t have 44 stamped on it. 🤣

 

 

 44 is definitely a bummer for sure.

[MtlJeff]

10 hours ago, bnp144 said:

 44 is definitely a bummer for sure.

 

It's not so much that, it's the 48 degree GW for me. It's the incremental creep---with a 44 PW you can't have a 50 GW

 

With shaft length and club design....i can hit my GW basically 20yds further than my 54 wedge. 

 

120yds is basically no-mans land for me now. 

[Pnwpingi210]

2 hours ago, MtlJeff said:

 

It's not so much that, it's the 48 degree GW for me. It's the incremental creep---with a 44 PW you can't have a 50 GW

 

With shaft length and club design....i can hit my GW basically 20yds further than my 54 wedge. 

 

120yds is basically no-mans land for me now. 

Bend pw to 45 and gw to 49

[JD3]

how does the sole compare to the original T100S or a T200? If it's more like a T200 than Im afraid this wouldnt be a good club for me. The magic of the original T100S was noticeably added forgiveness and about 1/2 club in distance, from the same slim sole as the T100. My issue with the T200 in any case was always the bigger, bouncy sole. Really hoping the new T150 retains the original T100S sole design.

[dmeeksDC]

Checked out the T150 today. Took a few snaps of them next to the Wilson Staff Model CB, two great looking irons if you like the “compact” look from address. They do look very similar in blade length and the width of the grooved portion of the faces is virtually the same. Titleist has the slightly thinner top line, but both are kind of a mid-sized top line, which I like. The Wilson is slightly taller at the heel so that gives it more of a squat look. The Titleist has a flatter, thinner sole while the Wilson has their usual sole, which is more cambered and slightly wider. 
 

Both are compact heads, among the smaller heads in their category. Not tiny, not intimidating, more of a comfortable compact size. When you put them next to comparable clubs like the ZX7 or 923 Tours or MP223 you can really see the smaller profile of the Titleist and Wilson. Sales rep said the T150 is doing well in fittings though he thought the new T200 might be doing as well or better and 150/200 combo sets are frequently what players choose.
 

Pitching wedges below, T150 is on the left, Staff Model CB on right. (Has the old school Wilson crimping on top of the hosel.)

 

8 irons, Wilson Staff CB on left 

[Brooks_Cupcake]

On 8/25/2023 at 5:45 PM, MtlJeff said:

Hello all......

 

With a couple of weeks until my club championship i told my head pro to withhold delivery of my T150s until after labor day.....However like the jerk that he is , he told me of their arrival a couple of days ago, knowing full well i would not be able to resist. 

 

After some course time and multiple range sessions....i am confident saying these are one of the best iron sets that has come out in a long time. They are in that sweet spot that will appeal to a countless amount of golfers.

 

A big issue with the T100 and T100S was the topline didn't change. The gap between T100 families and T200 was too big. The T100 family was a very thin topline, even smaller than my PXG blades to be honest. And then the T200 was kind of a different club alltogether

 

The T150 is kinda like a perfect club

-It's not THAT small.....You can see the trail end even on the 5 and 6 irons. And the topline is very manageable, i would think even 7-12 index types would have no issues with this

-That being said, it's one of the cleanest , most beautiful looking clubheads on the market even despite being a "smaller-midsize" head

-It's strong lofted but the launch is very nice, pretty high. For such a sexy cavity there's some junk down there. This is like a J-Lo club if you know what i mean

-The sole is very midrange....it's probably 1.5x the size of my PXG blades. 

 

At the end of the day---To me it's the perfect club for anyone in the <12 range. It's a relatively generous sole, topline and blade length that is small but not like crazy small (think like smaller than ZX7 but not so much so) and it's beautiful to look at in the bag

 

I think this set is gonna absolutely crush it. I think this is one we'll be talking about in 10 years. 

 

Anyway that's my .02---ask me questions if you want!

compared them pretty extensively vs the T100, and I didn’t find a discernible difference between the two. I saw a bit more ball speed but the peak height was the same but both got there in different ways.

The T150 was a better bit in terms of indoor optimized numbers because of the lower spin profile, but I preferred the feel of the T100 23’s. 
Both are great irons, but I didn’t see anything that knocked out my TCB.

[mixxedbag]

The key for me, after having T100S last series and now a T150/T200 combo set, is that I hit these higher than the same club in the T100.  Being able to hit higher from further is a-ok in my books.  I am stunned at how much I am enjoying these new T200 in the long irons. To me, that is the club that looks more like original AP2's, not the 150's, but I love this set already.